Hello Julien,
Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 09:42:38, Julien Escario wrote:
JE> Hello,
JE> I also have an issue with a base64_decode() function which seems
incompatible
JE> with amd64 arch.
JE> I'm using the patch from milkys (http://www.mcmilk.de/qmail/)
JE> Try to print the return string after ba
Hello,
I also have an issue with a base64_decode() function which seems incompatible
with amd64 arch.
I'm using the patch from milkys (http://www.mcmilk.de/qmail/)
Try to print the return string after base64 decoding has been done to check if
your auth string is correct. If it's not, that's q
Hi,
On 27.07.2011 at 00:56 a...@ltmd.org wrote:
>
> Just want to add that I tested right now and found that the same fresh
> programs configurations and settings on the clean 32-bit system
> working pretty good. Should I try once again to use recordio program
> on a 64-bit system?
'recordio' onl
Hello,
Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 00:05:10, anf wrote:
alo> Hello Rick,
alo> Sunday, July 3, 2011, 17:15:29, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM>> On 03/07/2011 5:11 AM, anf wrote:
>>> Hello Rick,
>>>
>>> Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also canno
Hello Rick,
Sunday, July 3, 2011, 17:15:29, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM> On 03/07/2011 5:11 AM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
>> Hello Rick,
>>
>> Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>> User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configu
On 03/07/2011 5:11 AM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
Hello Rick,
Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
mu
Hello Rick,
Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
>> difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
>> amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
>> multilib and to reemerge netqmail and v
On 01/07/2011 12:54 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no
suc
Hello Rick,
Friday, July 1, 2011, 16:13:45, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM> On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
>> I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
>> 64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
>> blocked me.
>>
>> Right now I have no mult
On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
blocked me.
Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with
netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2, dovecot-2
mail's license.
But if these have already been suggested and are not viable to
you for some reason then please disregardmy 2 cents here is
in Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11
on
>>>> BSD? There's others, but I've used both over the years with no problems. I
>>>> haven't switched to netqmail 1.06 but I thought it was primarily just a
>>>> version increment to reflect the change in qmail's license.
>>>>
>
Brian Lanier ha scritto:
- Original Message -
*From:* James Cox <mailto:ja...@imaj.es>
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com <mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fres
for some reason then please disregardmy 2 cents here is in
Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:4
- Original Message -
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conf
viable to you for some
>> reason then please disregardmy 2 cents here is in Canadian... ;)
>>
>> Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tren
>>
>>
>> From: James Cox
>> To: vchkpw@inter7.co
your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/
track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Pa
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if
it is worth using 1.0.6.
Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's smtp
Thank you James, grazie Tonino.
!DSPAM:4a30ba6832669637967409!
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth pa
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with othe
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with other auth patches com
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER r
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362
Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHK
Here is mine you can try to use my settings..
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31
I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a
solution
to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were s
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp
auth.
Remo
On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, "Rick Macdougall" wrote:
> James Cox wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>
>>> James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
175
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of t
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are enabl
Hi James,
What version of chkuser are you using?
When I look at the 2.0.9 source, I see the following lines inside
chkuser_settings.h:
/*
* the following line enables debugging of chkuser
*/
/* #define CHKUSER_DEBUG */
/*
* The following line moves DEBUG output from STDOUT (default) to ST
hey Harm,
Here's the run file for the log -
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
s250 n 10 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
and yeah- i figured that i'm pushing to stdout... which i expect the
log/run should catch via the multilog. therefore i'm a bit confused as
to how
Hi James,
You are copying stderr (file descriptor 2) to your stdout (that's what
the terminating 2>&1 is for). However, this log is only saved if
multilog is indeed catching it.
Find in the directory where this `run' file was located the directory
`log', and publish the content of the `run'
On 9 Jun 2009, at 18:16, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been
looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking
> at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
> immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced that these lines should ever
> exist in the smtp
Thanks for the info.
Trey Nolen
- Original Message -
From: "John Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd
On 2007-08-17, at 2113, Trey Nolen wrote:
I would suggest starting another instance of qmail-smtpd on port
587 that does not use the rbls, and has its own tcp.submpt.cdb
that allows anyone to connect, but does not ever set RELAYCLIENT.
This allows all addresses, but will only allow relay fo
On 8/17/2007 9:13 PM, Trey Nolen wrote:
being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance, is there a way to pass a
variable to tcpserver if the connection is authenticated via smtp-auth?
Not without patching. the process goes like this:
user -> tcpserver -> rblsmtpd -> qmail-smtpd (with smtp-auth)
I would suggest starting another instance of qmail-smtpd on port 587 that
does not use the rbls, and has its own tcp.submpt.cdb that allows anyone
to connect, but does not ever set RELAYCLIENT. This allows all addresses,
but will only allow relay for authenticated users.
Port 587, is the defa
Trey Nolen wrote:
We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using
smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line
like the following gets added to open-smtp:
ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",WHITELIST="" 1187395788
This keeps the us
: "Shane Chrisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth failed when no email to be retrieved
> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:59 +0700, Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
>
> Has the user checked the option "my outgoing server require
so you meant this is outlook express problem?
regards
Winanjaya
New Page 1
- Original Message -
From: "shadowplay.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] smtp auth failed when no email to be retrieved
>
>
&
vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] smtp auth failed when no email to be retrieved
>
>
>
>
> well um
> doesn't look like neone actually
> hit any thing that would give them a
> connection because your clients ip never appeared
> in a pop b4 smtp con
Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
> I am runnning qmail+vpopmail 5.4.17 with smtp auth for roaming users,
> my users use Outlook Express as email client to send/receive email.
>
> My problem is:
> It seems like smtp auth failed (see below message) when he/she does
> not have email to be retrieve.
>
> The me
well um
doesn't look like neone actually
hit any thing that would give them a
connection because your clients ip never appeared
in a pop b4 smtp connection.
your error message, and log extract as listed
does not show a pop connection cleanring the tcpserver
to clear the ip as an allowed re
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:59 +0700, Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
Has the user checked the option "my outgoing server requires
authentication"?
Shane
> Dear All,
>
> I am runnning qmail+vpopmail 5.4.17 with smtp auth for roaming users, my
> users use Outlook Express as email client to send/receive emai
Rick Macdougall escribió:
Mario Beltran wrote:
Hi
I have installed a new box on linux with qmail (i follow life with
qmail) + vpopmail + autorespond +ezmlm +qmailadmin + courier-imap
All works fine.
Now i need use smtp authentication.
I found a qmail-smtpd-auth-057 patch by Dr. Erwin Hof
Mario Beltran wrote:
Hi
I have installed a new box on linux with qmail (i follow life with
qmail) + vpopmail + autorespond +ezmlm +qmailadmin + courier-imap
All works fine.
Now i need use smtp authentication.
I found a qmail-smtpd-auth-057 patch by Dr. Erwin Hoffmann. But I cant
aplied yet
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:00:26 +0200
Henti Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:22 - (GMT)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If you are using an ebuild for qmail, can you send the output of the
> > following command to the list:
> >
> > # emerge -vp qmail
>
> [ebuild R
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:22 - (GMT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you are using an ebuild for qmail, can you send the output of the
> following command to the list:
>
> # emerge -vp qmail
[ebuild R ] mail-mta/qmail-1.03-r15 -noauthcram -notlsbeforeauth
(-selinux) +ssl 0 kB
--
Henti
If you are using an ebuild for qmail, can you send the output of the
following command to the list:
# emerge -vp qmail
> I've upgraded to vpopmail (5.4.6) and decided to switch to smtp auth ..
> since I couldn't get roaming working anyway.
>
> I'm still getting rcpthosts errors,
>
> where do I
On Jun 19, 2005, at 9:09 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
I don't know what dovecot does. I recompiled it and restarted it,
no difference. Here's what shows up in the mail facility for
syslog:
# tail -f /var/log/mail/current
Jun 20 04:08:51 [imap-login] Login: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [71.113.2.184]
Jun
On Monday 20 June 2005 00:49, Tom Collins wrote:
> Does dovecot link directly to libvpopmail? If so, did you
> recompile dovecot after enabling learn passwords and cleartext
> passwords in vpopmail? If not, it's still linked to the old
> vpopmail code.
I don't know what dovecot does. I recompil
On Friday 17 June 2005 20:20, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
> AFAIR it does exactly what you said.
Nope, doesn't seem to. I rebuilt vpopmail with it enabled, edited
out the cleartext portions of a vpasswd file, and logged in a bunch
of times as that user. No updates to vpasswd. :(
Cheers,
--
On Friday 17 June 2005 17:42, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
> 1. I've reconfigured vpopmail and added
> --enable-learn-passwords=y and --enable-clear-passwd=y
What is --enable-learn-passwords? If it does what I'm guessing it
does by name and starts recording missing cleartext entries in
vpass
> On Jun 17, 2005, at 11:21 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
>> Built as netqmail-1.05, patched SMTP-AUTH from vpopmail contrib, then
>> manually added Tonix' chkuser 2.0
>>
>> Everything is VERY happy now.
>
> Did you remember to remove $LOCAL from your qmail-smtpd/run file? If
> not, you can now auth with a
On Jun 17, 2005, at 11:21 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
Built as netqmail-1.05, patched SMTP-AUTH from vpopmail contrib, then
manually added Tonix' chkuser 2.0
Everything is VERY happy now.
Did you remember to remove $LOCAL from your qmail-smtpd/run file? If
not, you can now auth with any username/pa
>>
>> You've got an old SMTP AUTH patch that sends the MD5 challenge and
>> response in the wrong order.
>>
>> Use the patch from the contrib directory of vpopmail, and then remove
>> the $LOCAL from your run file, as the newer SMTP AUTH patch does not
>> use it.
>>
>> --
>> Tom Collins - [EMAIL
>
> You've got an old SMTP AUTH patch that sends the MD5 challenge and
> response in the wrong order.
>
> Use the patch from the contrib directory of vpopmail, and then remove
> the $LOCAL from your run file, as the newer SMTP AUTH patch does not
> use it.
>
> --
> Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 17, 2005, at 9:43 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
-H -l [[[my.host.name]]] \
-v -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-c 30 -R -u "$VPOPMAILUID" -g "$VPOPMAILGID" 0 smtp \
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -C \
-r 'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:Your message was rejected ' \
/
ISP Lists wrote:
sys: Fedora core3, manually compiled vpopmail 3.4.10, RPM Mysql 3.23.59?,
compiled courier imap 4.0.2, compiled qmail-1.03, patched
qmail-ej-cocktail-14.tar.gz, manually patched Tonix' chkuser 2.0.
I have installed vpopmail with roaming/SMTP-AUTH before, again using
Michael Bow
On Monday 16 May 2005 4:10 pm, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 16 May 2005 3:52 pm, Nick Gilbert wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I have IMAP authentication working for vpopmail and standard linux
> >>users, but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
> >>
> >>I need SMTP authentic
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 3:52 pm, Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I have IMAP authentication working for vpopmail and standard linux
users, but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
I need SMTP authentication to work for standard linux users (I'm not
worried about vpop users at all for S
On Monday 16 May 2005 3:52 pm, Nick Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have IMAP authentication working for vpopmail and standard linux
> users, but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
>
> I need SMTP authentication to work for standard linux users (I'm not
> worried about vpop users at all for SMTP
Dave Goodrich wrote:
> I believe I will move our smtp-auth users to another port and just fire
up another instance of qmail-smtpd, leaving the normal qmail-smtpd
running on port 25.
I don't see a standard port for smtp-auth, any thoughts? I've looked
through FreeBSD /etc/services file which is
On Feb 4, 2005, at 3:17 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
I don't see a standard port for smtp-auth, any thoughts? I've looked
through FreeBSD /etc/services file which is pretty complete, and found
no entry for smtp-auth. I'm leaning towards using port 9025.
Use port 587, 'submission'. It's just like SMT
Dave Goodrich wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Excellent, thank you. If I understand correctly I will also need to do
nothing to my current tcp.smtp file?
3) How does this effect users who do not supply auth info? Does
qmail-smtpd fall back to using t
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
1) What is everyone else using?
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
DENYMAIL="DNSCHECK"
export DENYMAIL
LOCAL=`/usr/bin/head -1 /var/qmail/control/
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
1) What is everyone else using?
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
DENYMAIL="DNSCHECK"
export DENYMAIL
LOCAL=`/usr/bin/head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
/usr/bin/spamd
Ispas Paul wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 13:56, Alastair Battrick wrote:
I'm having problems with SMTP Auth.
I am starting SMTP with
--
#!/bin/sh
QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
export QMAILQUEUE
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MA
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 13:56, Alastair Battrick wrote:
> I'm having problems with SMTP Auth.
>
> I have installed:
> Netqmail 1.0.5
> Vpopmail 5.4.8
> Simscan 1.0.8 & Spamassassin & Clamav
> Chkuser 2.0.7
> Bill Shupp's composite TLS & SMTP Auth patch, from
> http://shupp.org/smtp-auth-tls/
>
On Aug 7, 2004, at 5:39 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
OK, I've found that it was a client software error where CRAM-MD5
login is
advertised first. Pegasus mail wouldn't keep trying to get to plain
LOGIN, but The BAT! would "fail back" from CRAM-MD5 to plain LOGIN and
roaming SMTP relay works fine.
If you'
> I've built vpopmail 5.4.5 with mysql 3.23.57-ish on Debian potato. I've
> enabled roaming users and have included the SMTP-AUTH patch. Courier,
> vpopmail, qmail, and everything else compiled fine (I did not use Debian
> packages).
>
> POP3 works fine. Spam filtering works fine. Squirrelmail f
Ron Culler wrote:
I'm and having difficulty setting up a separate qmail server as a
smtp-auth server.
(* Its being done to provide inbound virus scanning prior to the message
being delivered to the local mailbox)
I have successfully setup Qmail and can get smtp-auth to work with
checkpassword an
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 21:28 schrieb blist:
First of all: I have the same problem - also on Dual-Opteron machines.
I also have been in contact with blist and X-ISTENCE...
> Ok, after the huge number of irrevlent replies to my last thread I am
> attempting to post an update on my SMTP Auth prob
Hi,
I've installed SPAMCONTROL and i've modified the tcp.smtp file like you
say (:allow,REQUIREAUTH="")
but now nobody can send me e-mail
the sender receive the message:
Your message has encountered delivery problems
to the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery failed
535 aut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
>
>
> First, I suggest You verify Your authentication. Start-tls is initiated,
> in that case the pasword has to be plain-text, not cram.
>
First off, starttls is not initiated, as then he would have had to enter
starttls t
please trim your posts. trimming your signature would be courteous too. you
don't need to quote 63k of original message to append two sentences.
At 02:23 PM 5/23/2004, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
Hello blist,
Sunday, May 23, 2004, 9:28:35 PM, you wrote:
b> If you've read this far, thanks!. Drop me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not
> working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username
> password over and over. Never sends.
How are they authentication? with [EMAIL PROTECT
PD> Ahhh...yes! A flame war...always nice :)
I quote from the one who has bringing 'the gas': EH> You are joking, troll
Well, I did't start. This list is to help people. It's not about to be picky
or to be arrogant, if someone share another view, he has the right to put his vision
forward and to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote:
EH> Hi,
EH> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote:
EH> Hi,
EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Title: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello Jeremy,
>
>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote:
>
>JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>>EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type &
On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and "login".
> EH> With CRAM-MD5 its quite save.
> Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailadress.
> If there are many hops between Your workstation and the smtp
On Friday 21 May 2004 09:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
> >> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
> >> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
> JKister> Are you insin
On Thursday 20 May 2004 09:24 pm, Brooks Roy wrote:
> I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
> it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same
> senario.
/bin/checkpassword generally needs to be run as root to authenticate users.
More than
Hi,
At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello blist,
>
>In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
>security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
>e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
>When a man-in-the-middle catch thi
On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
Are you insinuating that this is
Hello blist,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 2:00:08 AM, you wrote:
b> I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with
b> this patch:
b>qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
b> http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
b> Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
b>
I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not
working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username
password over and over. Never sends.
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
I have put in the patch as descri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
> it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the
> same senario.
What does your data.cdb or smtp.cdb look like that gets created from a file
I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same
senario.
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT the
> hostname in the run script for tcpserver?
>
> Wont this make the server an open relay?
No, cause that patch doesnt require a hostname on purpose, as to many
poeple
So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT the
hostname in the run script for tcpserver?
Wont this make the server an open relay?
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies, the solution i provided *WILL* not work. Considering the
code still cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies, the solution i provided *WILL* not work. Considering the
code still contains the hostname stuff.
What i suggest is you grab the patch from the vpopmail contrib
directory, it contains a copy that *will* work.
X-Istence
-BEGIN PGP SI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
>>Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
>>
>>exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 \
>>/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l "$LOCAL" -x \
>>/usr/local/vpopmail/etc/tc
The patch you are using is incredibly old.
You should consider auth-jms1.4a.patch from
http://www.jms1.net/qmail/auth-jms1.4a.patch
If that link is broken, google on "auth-jms1.4a.patch" and look at the
cached version.
You might also consider the qmail-requireauth.patch that allows you to
set
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo