Re: [videoblogging] Vlogonomics, Part I

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:34:11 +0100, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Eric Rice's Epsilon construct.. is that the same as the 4x4 grid he was talking about? Eric, did you ever post that matrix? I saw a whiteboard glimpse of it in the video chat... Eric Rice's matrix is at URL:

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
Generally speaking I'm the same as Josh Kinberg: 3 mins/ 25 MB. But it depends on a lot of factors. If there is a good text description of the video I'm more likely to watch, if I don't know what I'll be watching my patience with the piece is very low. Often I don't click through at all

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
Our team of trained professionals works around the cock developing original content What if I want my cock included? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
Note to you FireANT users, if you want to subscribe just use the PSP feed.It has the same QT videos as the iTunes feed.I'd also like to say...woo...and whew.-AQ Thank you, Mica, Adam, and the PAN team Meet our contributors – http://thepan.org/contributors/ Visit The PAN –

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:55:57 +0100, MICA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * * http://thepan.org/home.html Since the site is void of any explanatory details and the daily video download is 77MB (thus requiring a 12 minute wait for yours truly) I must ask: What *is* the pan? A videoblog with Really

Re: [videoblogging] Re: ipod conversion now built into iTunes

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:55:09 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: right... you had to drag the stuff in and it automatically converts. But it still had to convert. Its just that the interface was simple and

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Markus Sandy
i regularly download files in the 80-100Mb via fireant, although most are smaller. i tend to be less patient in the browser. if there is a feed, i'll use that instead if it makes sense. if not, i'll download it in the background. i generally multi-task and so rarely care how long the

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Why pack them all together into a 15 min. video?Why not let them each exist as separate videos that can be downloaded quicker and easier? You may as well simply link to the originals too in order to credit the creators. -joshOn 1/16/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's a 15 minute

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread duncan
i'd agree with josh/andreas that over 3 mins is often too much, i don't think this is directly related to my attention span (e.g. i'm a big tarkovsky fan), but purely due to the fact that i'm usually at my computer and multitasking when i watch them, and often have lots of them to watch!! in

[videoblogging] MSM on mobile phone advertising

2006-01-16 Thread Jan
URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/16/technology/16mobile.html?ex=1295067600en=4ca77eacb70dbebeei=5090partner=rssuserlandemc=rss NY Times on advertising trend: "Forget the 30-second spot on a 50-inch high-definition TV. How about a three-second message on the tiniest of screens?

Re: [videoblogging] MSM on mobile phone advertising

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:04:18 +0100, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The piece speaks of :03 ads delivered based on GPS technology and a potential $1.25 billion in ad revenues via cell phone by 2009. And they don't answer the obvious question: Why in the world would consumers tell advertisers

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:06:56 +0100, duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in terms of file size i guess i'm still pretty old school, i feel bad if i post a video over 5mb! You're my hero. 4MB/min is too much for most stuff. - Andreas -- URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media,

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Christian Wach
On 16 Jan 2006, at 12:06, duncan wrote: although now the mac version has browsing things could be getting better for me It does?? Not here - 1.0 b3 - and the FireANT website isn't offering a newer version as far as I can tell... do tell! Christian Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your

Re: [videoblogging] kids make vlogging dangerous

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
On Jan 15, 2006, at 9:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: over the weekend my friend's 7 year old brother, justin, grabbed the mini dv and began walking around the house; instead of dismissing him like we usually do, we viewed the videos he had saved on the camera and we got this:  

Re: [videoblogging] Come be a WATM Reporter!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Howdy Josh,I'd like to contribute and participate... I'm thinking one in every 10 or 20 essays I write might be good for we are the media... If it's cool with you I'll just write for myself and every once in a while I'll ease something over your way that I think is really on topic and you can

Re: [videoblogging] Come be a WATM Reporter!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Oh and I tried the form on the registration pageOUCH!Warning: strpos(): Empty delimiter. in /home/.neema/watm/wearethemedia.com/wp-includes/comment-functions.php on line 867Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at

Re: [videoblogging] Come be a WATM Reporter!

2006-01-16 Thread Josh Leo
darn it...i guess i have to talk to bre...some things never got fixed when he switched serversOn 1/16/06, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh and I tried the form on the registration pageOUCH!Warning: strpos(): Empty delimiter. in

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Stephanie Bryant
Christian, it's in the non-public beta, which rumors say will be released soon. Email Jay Dedman if you can beta-test for them. On 1/16/06, Christian Wach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 16 Jan 2006, at 12:06, duncan wrote: although now the mac version has browsing things could be getting

[videoblogging] re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Nerissa \(TheVideoQueen\)
I find myself revisiting this question every time I post a large file to my vlog. How much is too much? At what point will you (personally, yourself, as a vlog watcher): 1) Stop downloading the file. 2) Stop watching the movie (how many minutes, assuming it's not too boring). Just curious

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Christian, it's in the non-public beta, which rumors say will be released soon. Will be released publicly very soon. New Windows version and Website too! Its a big update. We've been working hard but have been a little quiet about it here in this group. -Josh On 1/16/06, Stephanie Bryant

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
Sorry, I crashed after replying to the last one.Awake again...On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why pack them all together into a 15 min. video?For context, and ease of use for the viewer. The stuff we include all looks really good together, one right after the other. And

[videoblogging] What to buy and use; Editing software / tools / tapes / magazines /

2006-01-16 Thread usadutch2001
I think you are all eager to answer some newbie questions? Yes I know they (newbies) keep coming over and over again and ask the same old stupid questions. But hey if you do not ask you never know what others think about it. Well here it goes; The ingredients so far -Bought a digital

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Ps. Josh, or any other FireANTers reading this, is there a one-click FireANT subscription mechanism? Or will there be? There is, and there will be an easy code-generator to copy-paste and embed a 1-click button into your site. We're gearing up for a new launch this week that will include new

Re: [videoblogging] re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Stephanie Bryant
Nerissa, can you explain what you mean by progressive buffering? On 1/16/06, Nerissa (TheVideoQueen) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) I also don't even start to watch videos if it takes more than a minute to download/buffer UNLESS I know I want to see this video for some reason I read in the

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
The idea here is that people who subscribe to The PAN are trusting us to provide 15 minutes of *Really Good* stuff, so they won't need them as separate chunks. You should at least provide better text descriptions on the site and in the feed. This will make it easier to trust that you are

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Philip Clark
3 minutes doesn't seem like a long time for a video. until you've got 20 of them to watch.i'll take a 30-second video that's so rockin' i have to watch it three times in a row, over a three-minute one where i'm fast-forwarding going "ok ok... i get it."disclaimer-- i am far from your typical

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
I agree with most of this. If it proves to be true that viewers won't watch a video until they've read something about it, we'll probably have to rethink our presentation. Although Rocketboom, Bottomunion, Human-Dog, etc. Not true. Rocketboom makes great use of text. There are always story

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
OK, so now i'm wondering if those of us, like me, who prefer shorter videos are simply more vocal than others. Come on, there's got to be some people out there who love the longer videos and just can't get enough of the large files. -Josh On 1/16/06, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
I mean, in theory, if we're talking faster and fatter pipes, won't file size limitations be a thing of the past? -josh On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so now i'm wondering if those of us, like me, who prefer shorter videos are simply more vocal than others. Come on,

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Sullivan
I guess that's a matter of opinion. I can't watch 15 min. of hardlyanything. I always prefer shorter bits to longer ones. interesting, since apps like fireANT's main benefit is downloading management which is most valuable if the video is larger (download overnight or while doing other

[videoblogging] Re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread johngaltsjournal
Well, I wouldn't say I just can't get enough of large files, I just don't really mind longer videos. Some people just make long videos, and if I enjoy them, I watch em! (yes, I'm looking at you, Mr. Richard Show.) After watching the Pan, I can see being on the train and enjoying the

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
interesting, since apps like fireANT's main benefit is downloading management which is most valuable if the video is larger (download overnight or while doing other things). if you are a fan of smaller chunks, then you could prob be happy watching videos on the web, no? No. I am a fan

Re: [videoblogging] Re: ipod conversion now built into iTunes

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
BTW, I've had the opportunity to try out the Apple iTunes convert to ipod feature for video. As a test I converted one feature length movie that had already been ripped from DVD as an mp4 yet was too high res for the ipod. iTunes converted it to a m4v in about 12 hours and it was about 700

[videoblogging] Re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread usadutch2001
For me size does not matter (in videos) However you got me mad if i have to download a 10 minute 50MB file showing some dork answering his email thru a vlog using the word whatever and like every 10 seconds. It is not the question do you like long or short video's for me it's more if the

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Markus Sandy
richard (madge) mentioned his desire for longer videoblogs during one of the video conferences a few weeks back Joshua Kinberg wrote: OK, so now i'm wondering if those of us, like me, who prefer shorter videos are simply more vocal than others. Come on, there's got to be some people out

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread BevSykes
short, long... whatever. its not even worth debating since the wide audience consists of many different preferences. why ask why and all that. Glad to hear you say that. My own feeling is that if it's done well, it will hold my attention no matter how long. Deirdre Straughan had one the

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is, and there will be an easy code-generator to copy-paste and embed a 1-click button into your site. We're gearing up for a new launch this week that will include new versions for Mac and Windows plus a new Website.Can you put The

[videoblogging] Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Share
Saw this today on CraigslistBlip wants short films The future is right now!Cheers Blip.Share RossRock n Roll TV SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:39:41 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, in theory, if we're talking faster and fatter pipes, won't file size limitations be a thing of the past? I thought you didn't spoke theory. ;o) Anyway, for the forseeable future demands will probably just

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:10:50 +0100, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: richard (madge) mentioned his desire for longer videoblogs during one of the video conferences a few weeks back And Markus posted the quote right after: URL:

Re: [videoblogging] Re: ipod conversion now built into iTunes

2006-01-16 Thread Arnþór Snær
iTunes won't even allow them into the library. I don't know if this will change after I install the DIVX QT component ... My experience is that qt codecs do not influence supported video types in itunes. -a Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to:

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Vincent Njoroge Ndonye
I prefer the shorter ones because of where I watch...at work or on my video ipod. When I can have it all connected to my living room tv...then I may want to watch longer pieces. And yeah, it'd better be a progressive download. On 1/16/06, usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For me size does

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread andrew michael baron
Also, with Rocketboom videos, you can click on the actual QT video frame to launch the story links in a browser window, when played in a browser. Most people don't know this detail because it's not mentioned anywhere and I haven't been able to come up with a comfortable graphic to add on

[videoblogging] Re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Bill Streeter
I tend to like shorter too. But then again if something is really good I often wish it was longer. I've been showing Nathan Millers Bicycle Sidewalk to my wife via my ipod plugged into the TV and she loves it. Her complaint is that it's too short! But then again that's the difference between

[videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread grasshopperatyourfeet
Anyone using Godaddy currently and if yeah feedback on how well you like it and what package you got? I'm thinking of doing the domain name yadda yadda stuff and could use some input. If I go with this thing I'll be changing my vlog name and all that good glop too so it all syncs up nicely.

Re: [videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
I use both Godaddy and Dreamhost, and I'll always recommend Dreamhost over Godaddy. I've had a terrible amount of downtime with Godaddy since I began using them for a video site last year. It seems that when a certain amount of people try to download the same video on a Godaddy server, it just

[videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Susan
They don't want films made to entertain children... I guess that leaves me out... heh Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Saw this today on Craigslist Blip wants short films The future is right now! Cheers Blip.

[videoblogging] Re: What to buy and use; Editing software / tools / tapes / magazines /

2006-01-16 Thread Susan
I'm one of the few PC users out here, and I use Roxio. If you can still find Roxio 7, it supports 3ivx, which allows you to make mp4's in one fell swoop. (Currently Roxio 8 does not support mp4 output). Personally, I can't stand Pinnacle. I don't have the latest version, but the older version I

[videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Susan
What if I don't have a cock at all? Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our team of trained professionals works around the cock developing original content What if I want my cock included? Yahoo!

Re: [videoblogging] Come be a WATM Reporter!

2006-01-16 Thread Ted Tagami
ooof! I was able to register and log in. Now I just have to come up with something newsworthy. I wont be prolific, but I do hope that I can add a different voice to the mix. This is very cool.On 1/16/06, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh and I tried the form on the registration

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread David Meade
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we all know and love for hosting. Are they related? On 1/16/06, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They don't want films made to entertain children... I guess that leaves me out... heh Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com --- In

Re: [videoblogging] What to buy and use; Editing software / tools / tapes / magazines /

2006-01-16 Thread David Meade
I use the same camera. I hate Sony Vegas. I use Premier Elements 2.0, and I like it ALOT :-) - Dave http://www.davidmeade.com On 1/16/06, usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you are all eager to answer some newbie questions? Yes I know they (newbies) keep coming over and over

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we all know and love for hosting. They're not. There's the Blip we love and then there's the blip whore who has a pact with sprint. - Andreas -- URL:

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Devlon
If it is something interesting, I don't mind the longer clips at all. I usually load 'em up in a new tab (firefox) and carry on with whatever I was doing until they are done. On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so now i'm wondering if those of us, like me, who prefer

[videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Nick
I think I am more of a fan of picking out my own content. That is the beauty of video on the web...the options. If I wanted someone else picking out what was cool for me to watch I could just turn on TV? No? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Devlon
I have found a ton of sites and video from other's that I may not have found myself. That is what I love about Steve Garfield's Vlog Soup, etc.On 1/16/06, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I am more of a fan of picking out my own content. That is the beauty of video on the web...the

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Verdi
On Jan 16, 2006, at 12:22 AM, Stephanie Bryant wrote:How much is too much? At what point will you (personally, yourself, asa vlog watcher):1) Stop downloading the file.For the most part, I download videos with FireAnt so this doesn't apply. It does it in the background or when I'm asleep so as

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Sullivan
http://bliptv.com/On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we all know and love for hosting.They're not. There's the Blip we love and then

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread David Meade
lol ... something tells me you're not a fan of sprint? :-P On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we all know and love for hosting.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
On 1/16/06, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I am more of a fan of picking out my own content. That is the beauty of video on the web...the options. If I wanted someone else picking out what was cool for me to watch I could just turn on TV? No?This is very true. If what you wanted

[videoblogging] Re: re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Nerissa \(TheVideoQueen\)
Nerissa, can you explain what you mean by "progressive buffering"?On 1/16/06, Nerissa (TheVideoQueen) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) I also don't even start to watch videos if it takes more than a minute to download/buffer UNLESS I know I want to see this video for some reason I read in the

[videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Share
OMG! thanks for the clarification on that Andreas. Had no idea there was an evil blip. cheers. s. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I heard that this

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
I've never had to endure Sprint, but I'm not a fan of companies stealing the name of other companies. It creates confusion and the blip.tv guys don't need that. - Andreas On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:53:07 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lol ... something tells me you're not a fan

Re: [videoblogging] Where are the emails?

2006-01-16 Thread Joan Khoo
Sydney Australia. Just as well, the Tuesday flash meeting is on Wednesday afternoons here. :) On 1/17/06, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THank god!We were taking a respite... in the U.S. we call it sleeping, verynecessary even if some don't actually do it so much.Monday afternoon?

[videoblogging] Screencasting in Windows Media File (long)

2006-01-16 Thread Stephanie Bryant
This is not specifically vlog-related, but I need some help and you are all very knowledgeable. I am normally a Mac/iMovie user, so this is all a steep learning curve. Unfortunately, my deadline is tomorrow for a finished product, so I have to leap the curve ASAP. OK, here are the specs of my

[videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, with Rocketboom videos, you can click on the actual QT video frame to launch the story links in a browser window, when played in a browser. Most people don't know this detail because it's not

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Just an FYI... that PSP feed I think needs a little work.http://thepan.org/psp.xmlI plugged it into mefeedia and got no videos. Looked at the feed and it only has one video in it.http://mefeedia.com/feeds/4217/Is this the exact same feed used in itunes?I'm not quite ready to click on that link

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Stephanie Bryant
I seriously hope blip.tv has a trademark registration-- the name similarity IS causing customer confusion, which is exactly what trademark exists to prevent. This Blip whore needs to go! --Stephanie On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100,

Re: [videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Richard Show
I use GoDaddy, but my buddies like Adam and Bill Streeter keep telling me how good Dream Host is and they are, of course, smarter, but I'm lazier and I'm also afraid of the hassle of changing - especially since I'd have to change the ftp stuff in blogger to point to dream host and then the

Re: [videoblogging] Screencasting in Windows Media File (long)

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
On 1/16/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Image quality: 0That's a problem, I bet. I use 70 at least, and that's when I don't care about sharpness too much.I'd think for a screencast you'll want to make it 95 or so. You set it in the Video Smoothness box under the Compression

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Where's your mefeedia one click button!? I want mefeedia! http://mefeedia.com/feed_promote.php?id=4217 Of course please make sure you get your feed 100% first I want to be able to watch it too. :) BTW, I personally LOVE the format... sure it has some kinks.. but it's experimental... I

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Quirk
Hmm, well it's only supposed to have one video in it, since today's the 1st day. But I wonder why it's not showing up in Mefeedia?The gaddammed Effing movable type plugin is making an enclosure out of our poster frame, which has been baffling me for several weeks now. But I don't think Mefeedia

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Richard Show
On 1/16/06, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I wouldn't say I just can't get enough of large files, I just don't really mind longervideos.Some people just make long videos, and if I enjoy them, I watch em! (yes, I'm looking atyou, Mr. Richard Show.) ... hey, my recent ones are

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Devlon
I tried adding it earlier and noticed the two enclosure tags. I wouldn't think the system would exclude it for that, but I'll look at the code tonight.On 1/16/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, well it's only supposed to have one video in it, since today's the 1st day. But I wonder

Re: [videoblogging] Screencasting in Windows Media File (long)

2006-01-16 Thread Stephanie Bryant
That didn't seem to help in previewing in the Storyboard. The files play just fine in Windows Media Player when I view them separately from the Windows Movie Maker. --Stephanie On 1/16/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/16/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Image

Re: [videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Lucas Gonze
I use Godaddy for domains but not for hosting. I use them for domains because they're not jerks and the prices and features are fine. I've had them for a couple years now, and my long term experience has been good. For hosting something about them doesn't turn me on, though that's just a vibe

Re: [videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Halcyon Lujah
I have about 75 domains registered at GoDaddy. i like the interface and management tools. But I host with Dreamhost and oc3Networks. -halcyon spreadingthepink.com On 1/16/06, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use Godaddy for domains but not for hosting. I use them for domains because

[videoblogging] help with audio into computer

2006-01-16 Thread Richard Show
I have a digital mixer (BOSS BR-864), and it has a usb port and it's done a really good job with music or voice I have recorded, transferred to my computer and used in vlogs.I have also tried to do voice over recording with Final Cut Pro by just sticking a cheap microphone in the mic input and

[videoblogging] New Blog. Underwater, film sets, theme, and deeper meaning.

2006-01-16 Thread kylefasanella
hey guys I just finished my newest blog http://vilekylefasanella.blogspot.com/ The Line Blurs. I am trying something new and want to know what you guys think. kyle fasanella Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

Re: [videoblogging] Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Arnþór Snær
I don't care that much about the filesize, since my aggregator fetches the media in the background. Here is my take on the length issue. I am a fast forwarder. I fast forward through stuff im not sure on. I may fast forward through some vlogs, while others will play uninterrupted. Here's an

Re: [videoblogging] Screencasting in Windows Media File (long)

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Sullivan
maybe try camstudio.orgOn 1/16/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:This is not specifically vlog-related, but I need some help and youare all very knowledgeable. I am normally a Mac/iMovie user, so this is all a steep learning curve. Unfortunately, my deadline is tomorrowfor a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Long and File Size: Revisiting the question

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:45:58 +0100, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suspect that as more devices come along to allow aggregated internet video content to be displayed on a television then there will be a greater demand for longer videos. No doubt. I have the feeling that public

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:58:16 +0100, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, with Rocketboom videos, you can click on the actual QT video frame to launch the story links in a browser window, when played in a browser. Most people don't know this detail because it's not mentioned

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip and Sprint

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:26:23 +0100, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seriously hope blip.tv has a trademark registration-- the name similarity IS causing customer confusion, which is exactly what trademark exists to prevent. I'm certain the blip.tv guys are all over it. However

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:37:11 +0100, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note to anybody using MTEnclosures, know how to exclude an enclosure by length? I can't use mime_exclude because they're both technically qt vids. Josh Kinberg hacked MTEnclosures a long time ago into a MTRelEnclosure

[videoblogging] Re: Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread grasshopperatyourfeet
Thank you for all the input folks! Yes I see the consensus is leaning toward don't "Host" at Godaddy but it's okay for domain. That works for me as I am but a humble cog in a larger wheel and have no desire at this time for hosting services.Thank you to everyone and especially to CyberDad. I

[videoblogging] http://mostextraordinary.blogspot.com

2006-01-16 Thread DrLinton Hutchinson
Feedback on my latest MostExtraordinary! Appreciated http://mostextraordinary.blogspot.com With friendly greetings, Linton Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
On Jan 16, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: interesting, since apps like fireANT's main benefit is downloading management which is most valuable if the video is larger (download overnight or while doing other things). if you are a fan of smaller chunks, then you could prob be

[videoblogging] Re: What to buy and use; Editing software / tools / tapes / magazines /

2006-01-16 Thread David Howell
I use both a PC and a Mac to do my editing. It all depends on what system I sit down to at any given time. On my PC, for editing, I use Adobe Premiere Pro. After I have done all my editing, I save the movie as an uncompressed AVI then encode it to an 320x240 H.264 MOV file using Quicktime Pro.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Devlon
On 1/16/06, grasshopperatyourfeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you to everyone and especially to CyberDad. I suppose I could have just hollered up the stairs at you and asked this question in person but that would indeed have required some form of human interraction but even more

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Well said Bev.I'd also like to add that Raymond makes these tiny little video clips that last between 2 and 30 second.  It is what it is... and I think everything has a validity. Though we should feel free to explore use case scenarios for these different lenght media let's try to set our

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Nick wrote: I think I am more of a fan of picking out my own content. That is the beauty of video on the web...the options. If I wanted someone else picking out what was cool for me to watch I could just turn on TV? No? as is your right Nick... but in a world

Re: [videoblogging] Screencasting in Windows Media File (long)

2006-01-16 Thread Stephanie Bryant
The non-pay version has a watermark, and I can't wait for IT to jump through the paperwork hoops to buy a license. Besides which, I'm not sure that would solve the problem with Windows Movie Maker, which is what's showing the preview at such a bitmappy display. --Stephanie On 1/16/06, Michael

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Richard Show
On 1/16/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You two sound like my son and I, we use IM clients to talk to eachother from either side of a wall...nice parenting eh?... I find that if you use the proper emoticons, :) {:/ ... it's a perfect substitute for actual human interaction ... -- Richard

Re: [videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread johnie tidwell
Have you heard anything about midphase with regard to their hosting package? They said they have unmetered bandwidth...what exactly does that mean?Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use GoDaddy, but my buddies like Adam and Bill Streeter keep telling me how good Dream Host is and they

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Joan Khoo
Sad isn't it? I IM my fiance who is sitting 10 feet away in the same room. Nevermind talking, its too hard. On 1/17/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/16/06, grasshopperatyourfeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you to everyone and especially to CyberDad. I suppose I could have just

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
The pan is the next version of the original MTV... :)Only instead of stringing together music videos they got for free the pan is sringing together viral and independant media.Just like mtv this works because The Pan is giving these artist promotion it's the same model... just a different

Re: [videoblogging] The PAN!

2006-01-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Well here's the two feeds.iPod: http://mefeedia.com/feeds/4233/PSP: http://mefeedia.com/feeds/4217/There's most definitely things to be fixed on both sides... mefeedia is probably hanging on the double enclosure and The Pan needs to remove the image enclosure can't waut to be watching yumme

Re: [videoblogging] Screencasting in Windows Media File (long)

2006-01-16 Thread Martina Schubert
Stephanie Bryant schrieb: The non-pay version has a watermark, and I can't wait for IT to jump through the paperwork hoops to buy a license. Hello Stephanie, Try this great freeware WINK: http://www.debugmode.com/wink/ I suggest you read also the tutorial on that site. You can achieve good

Re: [videoblogging] Godaddy question

2006-01-16 Thread Dawn Endico
I'm glad you asked this question. I'm shopping around for a domain registrar too. Does anyone have any experience with Yahoo? I see they're advertizing $2.99/year for domain registrations. That's such a good price there must be a catch. Do any of you bother with Private Domain Registration?

  1   2   >