I see they don't mention using deuterium, (heavy hydrogen,) and micro-cluster
palladium as a source, which is the easiest and most cost effective.
On Monday, September 20, 2021, 08:29:46 AM PDT, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
government and big tech working together is
unsubscribe
It is referred to as 5th density; not 5th dimension. Torsion, (or toroidal,)
fields were actually expounded upon by Russian scientist, (Shipov, Heim,
Kozarev, etc.) who did EXTENSIVE research and experimentation on torsion
fields. This throws string theory out the window and explains the
They are more like geometric vibrations from the quantum vacuum fluctuations
with miniature black holes at the vortices.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:20 PM, Robin
wrote: In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:49:49
+0100:
Hi,
[snip]
I am not on these threads very often so I am not up to date; does anyone know
where science and the development of cold fusion is at currently?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:30 PM, Robin
wrote: In reply to Michael Foster's message of Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:02:10
I must've missed a few classes; are you talking about creating or removing heat
in a general sense, starting an atomic nuclear reaction, or simply producing
energy? I joined the group last night and, obviously, missed a few emails, too.
Just curious.Bob Lee
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
You have no idea what a pain in the butt it was troubleshooting this.
The issue turned out to be that Centos6 and Ubuntu hard coded where the lists
had to be but they hard coded them in DIFFERENT locations and didn't bother
to document this anywhere.
On 2019-07-02 02:28, Jed Rothwell wrote:
So, how do you make this money? Not by trying to sell energy! That is
a highly regulated industry. It is a difficult and complex business.
Mine cryptocurrency.. if someone can figure out how to generate
electricity, mining machines can consume as much
s are often designated by mass - so you can see the
problem with proper labeling.
From: Jones Beene
Thanks Robert. I should have spent more time on the explanation of
that table, but the post was already getting too long.
The "JM Pd" is type A which is 23% Ag. This was apparently
successful
e
problem with proper labeling.
From: Jones Beene
Thanks Robert. I should have spent more time on the explanation of
that table, but the post was already getting too long.
The "JM Pd" is type A which is 23% Ag. This was apparently
successful 17 times out of 28 including the hero effor
Looking at Table 10 in the document cited, it
would appear that Boron is the smoking gun, not
silver. In fact Pd-Ag never worked but Pd-B worked 7 out of 8 times.
Robert Dorr
At 07:31 AM 10/29/2016, you wrote:
Fire up a rousing version of "The William Tell
Overture"
extropy...@gmail.com
Jed,
Rossi has said that he spent most of the time in
the "Computer Container", which was a 9m X 2.5m X
2.5m container separate from the "Reactor Container".
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:50 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Axil Axil <<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>janap...
Jed,
They had two fans over the production area and two fans over the reactor area.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:19 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
I have seen pictures of the roof and there were two industrial type
fans
if they were actually prevented from
entering the premises, but maybe they were. They
approved the manufacturer according to the
contract so they knew what was being produced.
I'm sure we will find out when it gets to court.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:06 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr
Axil,
I have seen pictures of the roof and there were
two industrial type fans on the roof where the production was taking place.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:10 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Can you get a photo of the top of the factory
building that shows no fan driven ventilation on
the rood
Jed,
Get real, the proof is in the flow rates and the temperature delta.
That is all that is required.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 12:51 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
Jed,
Heat is heat. It makes no difference if the
.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 12:17 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
Â
Why would it matter what the person using the
heat does with it. All you should be concerned
with is the temperature of the out flowing
fluid/steam and it's
pipes in it, one out going hole /pipe and one incoming hole/pipe
and not give a damn what is happening on the other side of the wall.
The results will be the same.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
main units is offline for maintenance, without having to resort
to using the backup power. This provides, in effect, a double back-up
for the production of power."
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:17 PM 5/15/2016, you wrote:
Okay, here are the specs for these boilers:
file://
Jed,
Didn't Rossi switch from the small square 10kw boxes you refer to, to
4 250kw units.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:17 PM 5/15/2016, you wrote:
Okay, here are the specs for these boilers:
file:///home/chronos/u-1160197d37ec1500e70f021620dd3bae3f09f41c/Downloads/DR_Electric%20Steam
is the COP. I am not
taking into account any losses, but with
a system this large and a COP of 50 who gives a damn.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 06:00 AM 5/15/2016, you wrote:
Stephen Cooke
<<mailto:stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
This is probably a na
een is accurate. If they are someone
that you don't know very well, can you be certain
that the information being given you is indeed accurate?
Thanks,
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 08:35 PM 5/14/2016, you wrote:
Axil Axil <<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
Â
Jed o
A good paper, especially for those interested in the PdD aspect of
LENR. I like Ed Stroms approach of the PdD reaction.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 09:56 AM 4/24/2016, you wrote:
<http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/04/apr-24-2016-lenr-great-paper-by-ed.html>http://egooutpeters.blogspot.r
Does taking measurements constitute "running" a boiler? As far as I know
no one has ever said that they ran the boiler. (Penon, etc)
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
On 4/11/2016 8:14 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
In answer to those who claim that Rossi's friends and countrymen -
Penon a
I stand corrected. Rossi said, just today, that I.H built the E-Cat for
the Lugano test and that they even signed it.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
On 4/7/2016 7:11 PM, Robert Dorr wrote:
You will notice it says that Rossi and I.H. provided an E-Cat for "a"
test measurement (I read as
*De-lurks*
Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo
worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track
to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they
would be doing so with a big smile on their face. The very
You will notice it says that Rossi and I.H.
provided an E-Cat for "a" test measurement (I
read as a singular measurment) not necessarily
for the Lugano Test. Possibly to verify any
ionizing radiation. So many possible ways to read
all of this rapidly developing information.
R
It wasn't a month long test, it was a 24 hour
test performed in Ferrara Italy. I keep seeing
that supposedly I.H. was the one that built the
e-cat used in the Lugano test. As far as I can see that is completely untrue.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 03:55 PM 4/7/2016, you wrote:
They also paid
Good old "Tit for Tat". I.H. is obviously disputing the results of the
year long test based on lack of scientific rigor. One of these years
maybe we will find out who has the better lawyer.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
On 4/7/2016 12:29 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://www.prnewswir
They do have an office at 7900 Glades Rd., Boca
Raton, FL. The building is definitely large enough to use a 1MW plant.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 07:48 PM 4/6/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
Â
It could be their business office a
It could be their business office and they have another
building/warehouse at a different location.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 07:32 PM 4/6/2016, you wrote:
One of the legal documents lists Rossi's customer:
<http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016
feels he is due. He just wasn't going to be taken
again. Obviously, just my own take on what's going on.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 06:27 PM 4/6/2016, you wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
<<mailto:blazespinna...@gmail.com>blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
I
In the court filing it says that the average COP was in excess of 50
and sometimes in excess of 60. All I can say is WOW! I hope it holds
true. A lot of grist for the mill.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 04:55 PM 4/6/2016, you wrote:
I have a feeling that Mr. Fulvio Fabiani has contributed
Nicely done presentation. Well worth giving a look.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
On 4/4/2016 12:30 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t=j==s=web=1=rja=8=0ahUKEwiapIem2vXLAhVD5xoKHQXPBH8QFggeMAA=http%3A%2F%2Ftempid.altervista.org%2FSRI.pdf=AFQjCNHGSrVCJe9dIt-onShZbvLMIpg6cA
c reaction to a less than favorable report and possibly even a
"failure" finding by the ERV. It came out positive instead of
negative, wonderful! I think people are reading a lot into the IH
statement that is unfounded.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
It will be an absurd charade unless Indus
A very well done program, regarding the search for anti-gravity, as are
most if not all of the BBC's Horizon series.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
On 3/24/2016 6:10 AM, Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L,
Nick Cook of Janes Defence Weekly covered Project GreenGlow for years.
Here is an update
the road with the interpretation of the
Rossi results. Simple fiduciary resposibility.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 09:11 AM 3/11/2016, you wrote:
One possibility is that Rossi is doing something that rankles IH, and
IH does not like it one bit. It goes like this: IH was all set to sell
the 1 MW plant
If the burst was from Rn-222 then I would expect various Radon daughters
to show up on the gamma spectrum. Rn-222 is an alpha emitter.
Bob
WA7ZQR
On 2/24/2016 9:03 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:* Daniel Rocha
In figure 7 (compare with figure 6), it seems that the signal is
above the
I may be wrong, but I'm under the impression that they have repeated
this several times and there is more information to be released today.
Bob
WA7ZQR
On 2/24/2016 6:43 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Where is the big surprise?
I woke this morning with anticipation - expecting to see proof from
Watch the MFMP site (Quantumheat.org). It looks like a major
announcement shortly.
Bob
WA7ZQR
%3D%3D=1_x_2
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Robert Ellefson <vortex-h...@e2ke.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Dear Vorticians,
>
>
>
> I just came across this reference to some new research showing
> previously-undescribed electron spin-coupling modes that I thought folks
>
Dear Vorticians,
I just came across this reference to some new research showing
previously-undescribed electron spin-coupling modes that I thought folks
here might find interesting. I don't have access to the full article yet,
but I did find some related work by the first author.
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015
9:20 AM
FORTH is an interesting RPN (Reverse Polish Notation) programming language.
Quite primitive, but deceptively powerful once you get a handle of it.
I already liked RPN from using and programming my
I thought the spinsters in this crowd would find the following article
rather interesting:
http://phys.org/news/2015-08-magnon-phonon-magnetoelastic-magnetic-photoexci
tation.html
They describe anomalies involving interactions of spin-domain boundaries and
photonic energy.
Here is a relevant
I skimmed through it, one thing that struck me was that they hit 1372°C for
10 minutes. I have serious doubts that their stainless steel vessel could
have survived such a temperature (barely bellow melting) - which makes me
suspicious of an error somewhere, this is above where k-type
*delurks*
Frustrating that with COP's 2 and output powers of 100's to 1000's of
watts that simple calorimetry cannot be used to remove doubt, instead we
have 5-10 equivocal demonstrations from Rossi over last 4 years,
(supposedly a genius, yet not competent or willing to do this relatively
minor
Jack,
Fantastic! I’m really stoked to hear of your progress. I think your powder
recipe sounds very interesting, and I would love to know more about the details
of the reactants. It sounds like you’ve come up with a mixture which may
contain one or more key ingredients not yet identified
2014-11-02-vortexspace-package.ziphttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102617070/2014-11-02-vortexspace-package.zip
Please review the attached package on schematics for the solution to the
curvature of space-time and the solution of a tested and working overunity
Tokamak Reactor without the need
(Cross-posted from e-catworld )
Axil,
Although some aspects of this reaction may be occurring, I suspect that the
large crystal sizes for both the iron and lithium aluminum hydrate suggest that
this fuel does not have sufficiently dispersed nano-scale reactants, which this
article
Since the publication of the Rossi independent third party report on
the ecat, I have noticed a distinct change in the attacks on Rossi
and in more to the point, LENR in general. There has been a continual
flood of ideas and papers regarding various aspects of LENR (and its
various
against it and the soil looks to be of a sandy
nature, perfect for the making of an impression. I agree that it
looks like the head of a Phillips screw.
Robert Dorr
At 08:36 AM 11/2/2014, you wrote:
That looks a lot like the impression left from a Philips screw head
that has been pressed
At 07:34 PM 10/31/2014, you wrote:
Another YouTube link to the same
video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZTXHw1mZD4.
If that's missing just to a search on YouTube for Boyd Bushman
Deathbed Confession.
Kind of interesting.
The You Tube link doesn't work for me. Looks like there
There was some discussion last week about these reactions, based on
newly-released papers, on this thread:
“[Vo]:Is the E-Cat reaction a plasmon-driven instance of a
metastable innershell molecular state (MIMS) mediated neutron exchange?”
:02 PM
In reply to Robert Ellefson's message of Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:53:02 -0700:
...these are three particle reactions, which are very rare. Furthermore
these reactions require that two neutrons transfer simultaneously,
which is also highly unlikely. In the reactions I provided only
produced from fusion reactions and others injected by megawatt beams used to
heat the plasma to fusion temperatures. New experiments are shedding light
on one of the major mechanisms by which fast ions can be ejected from
plasma.
-Bob
From: Robert Ellefson Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:25 PM
a question with in regards to the IR
cameras and Rossi's ecat is, Were the cameras calibrated properly?,
and they say on page 4 of the report that the cameras were calibrated
by the respective manufacturers laboratories.
Robert Dorr
At 10:16 PM 10/25/2014, you wrote:
Hank Mills transcript :
https
think that there is no problem using the IR cameras
for accurate measurement of the temperature of the Rossi ecat as long
as the cameras were calibrated properly.
Robert Dorr
At 10:16 PM 10/25/2014, you wrote:
Hank Mills transcript :
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WNDVQVEhmUjJ4ek0
sample was salted - which
is
to say that it was compromised by the addition of a pure isotope. Show me
one US nuclear physicist who would believe otherwise - and fully back Rossi
on the issue of in situ manufacture of pure (99.3%) Ni62.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sent
From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 6:18 AM
are you implying this reaction can occur without gas loading? If your
theory
does require gas atoms what function do you assign them?
Dear Fran, Bob Cook, and vortex-l,
My interpretation of the evidence is that the
Oops, I see at least one significant typo in the reaction table.
The first line should read:
Li-7 + Ni-58 + Li-7 + stimulus - 2Li-6 + Ni-60 + sr-gammas
This is the first step of the enrichment cycle.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 5:29 PM
of aluminas's opaqueness at wavelengths above
approximately 3.5u. Almost everyone gets hung up on the visible
wavelength pictures that were published in the report. They bear
almost no relation to what the IR cameras were observing.
Robert Dorr
At 04:51 PM 10/24/2014, you wrote:
Worth listening
Dear Vortex-L,
Stimulated by Jones Beene's thoughts on a coherent lasing system based on a
Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) from his postings earlier today, I hope to
encourage further discussion along these lines of thought.
In reference to the characteristic morphology of the nickel ash grain
There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
available with 30-40% efficiency using 7-800°C input temperatures. They
range from 100W-30kW in capacity. So no problem doing a self-driven system
with LENR COP of 3.2
Qenergy probably easiest to get a hold of (around 33%,
, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
available with 30-40% efficiency using 7-800°C input temperatures. They
range from 100W-30kW in capacity. So no problem doing a self-driven system
with LENR COP of 3.2
Dear Vortex-l,
I found these papers from Young K. Bae, published recently in Physics
Letters A and Results in Physics, to be of tremendous interest and potential
relevance to the phenomena we are witnessing in the E-Cat and possibly other
LENR reactions.
(I note that these whole papers can be
(Dave, my granddad is Bob, I'm Robert :) ), I would be over the moon if we
had incontrovertible evidence of COP, but with a strong grounding in and
respect for the scientific method you cannot and should not ever give bold
assertions a free ride without vigorous critical review the skeptics
heat.
Harry
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Not if it is touching the walls of inner or outer alumina tube in places,
intermittent contact due to vagaries of original wire winding around inner
tube and subsequent large differential
If the LENR reaction suffers from thermal runaway then the best means for
cooling is a coolant fluid slightly below the target temperature. Eg
1180°C coolant and 1200°C running temp so raising temp to 1240°C would then
triple cooling rate, so 'clamping' the temperature. A lithium heat pipe
would
Robert, I will make every attempt to use your correct name in the
future. Thanks for clarifying your reasons for exhibiting the strong
critical position against the report.
I admit that I harbor questions about the accuracy of the temperature
measurements for many of the reasons that you point
how do you know this? How do you know the the wire is not the brightest
area?
On 15 October 2014 15:06, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people suspect that the resistor wire can't be Inconel because they
are predicted to melt at the reactor's operating temperature. However,
since
Highly doubtful. Above curie temperture of Nickel so no ferromagnetism,
and powder too microscopic hot resistivity too high, and AC frequency,
current and number of windings too low for strong magnetic fields or
significant eddy currents to form and give push via lenzs law.
On 15 October 2014
can see the the
dark lines are of uniform width, continuity and shade. I am 95% confident
that is the shadow of the coil. The light areas change in brightness,
width, etc.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
how do you know this? How do you
to. I think that is pretty strong indication that it is the wires
that are the bright areas.
On 15 October 2014 20:14, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am looking at high zoom at the same photos and finding it easy to draw
the opposite conclusion. Confirmation bias on both our
Not lying, but perhaps again confirmation bias, based on wrong assumptions.
How can the inconel wire in Fig 12b be hotter/brighter in the cooler
external environment outside the end of the reactor than it is in the
hotter internal environment inside the reactor?
On 15 October 2014 21:12, Blaze
transfer physics
at play make it a strong possibility that there was no gain.
On 15 October 2014 21:40, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Robert Lynn
How can the Inconel wire in Fig 12b be hotter/brighter in the cooler
external environment outside the end of the reactor than
but it is indeed a novel reaction and it
needs to be studied and not scoffed at.
Robert Dorr
On 10/15/2014 6:40 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:* Robert Lynn
How can the Inconel wire in Fig 12b be hotter/brighter in the cooler
external environment outside the end of the reactor than
Makes you wonder if this is LENR related. 100 megawatts from a reactor
that fits on a truck, and no radioactive waste!!! Hmmm
Robert Dorr
On 10/15/2014 8:19 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Lockheed says makes breakthrough on fusion energy project - Yahoo News
WHOA !
http://news.yahoo.com
Watching the video makes me a bit suspicious of the no radiation claim.
High temperature fusion, magnetically bottled in a small container.
Seems to me the container will eventually become radioactive.
Robert Dorr
On 10/15/2014 9:17 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
The video is pretty
http
then, I'll just presume this to be
artifact.
-Bob
From: Robert Ellefson
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 5:29 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor
Given the results of the SIMS analysis from the Lugano report,
particularly
as detailed in this posting:
http://www.mail-archive.com
the resistor wire expands with respect to the alumina as it heats up,
breaking any bonding contact, or lifting the wire of the inner alumina tube
in more and more places and leading to less and less conductive contact -
prompting the wire to heat up as more as more of the energy it transmits to
suggest you think a bit longer about it.
On 16 October 2014 08:33, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Since they are measuring the input energy to the wire that makes no sense
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
the resistor wire expands
such units are not made as 3 phase helically wound assemblies, MoSi2 is
non-ductile/brittle and very difficult to make and even worse to bond to,
and there is still the unanswered problem of how do you bond inconel wire
that can survive only to 1350°C to an insulated heating element that is
to confirm or disprove your theory, and numbers
would at least give foundation to your hope.
On 16 October 2014 09:25, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this not indicate that the wire must be producing inductive heating
in the powder?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Robert Lynn
...@gmail.com wrote:
If the wire inside the reactor was hot enough to glow it should produce a
more uniform spiral glow along the entire length of the tube.
Harry
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Additionally, look at the darkened photo
Nullis in verba. :) I believe my eyes more than others words. In finding
so many potential faults with so little published information (they had a
month to investigate!!) I can only say that I am unimpressed by the
critical observational skills of the testers. If they had approached this
demo
Nullis in verba. :) I believe my eyes more than others words. In finding
so many potential faults with so little published information (they had a
month to investigate!!) I can only say that I am unimpressed by the
critical observational skills or reporting of the testers. If they had
McKubre’s point about the value of the implications of the input power step
response is very important, and I entirely agree. In terms of systems
analysis, when you have an input step function, the derivative of that input
then becomes an approximation of the Dirac delta function, otherwise
Given the results of the SIMS analysis from the Lugano report, particularly
as detailed in this posting:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg98596.html
I believe that it is possible to evaluate the nuclear activity of candidate
fuel samples simply by sputter-cleaning them as
of the
Lugano test makes it look like it was another bust with at best very low
COP :(
A curse upon perpetrators of poor calorimetry!
On 13 October 2014 18:46, Marcus Haber tr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Robert!
Why dont u go over to
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/722-Ask
I've just realised that if my no-LENR output power conclusion is sound,
then Rossi is in serious trouble trying to explain the Ni62 ash. Could be
the end of him.
On 13 October 2014 20:11, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
done, not much point in doing more exhaustive
The system is way too complex for thermography to be able to deal with. I
note that most black-body radiation for 1400°C:
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131016/ncomms3630/images_article/ncomms3630-f4.jpg
has majority of emission at 4um where the alumina transmittance appears
relatively high in
, a further check was made to ensure that the PCEs and the
IR cameras were not yielding anomalous readings. So I see no reason to
recalibrate over and over. They checked for anomalous readings and none
were found.
Robert Dorr
On 10/13/2014 8:19 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:* Jed Rothwell
2
Looking closely at figures 5-8 of appendix 3 of the Lugano report, I believe
we can see evidence for the evolution of a mass 69 species during
sputter-cleaning of the samples while undergoing ToF-SIMS analysis in a
scanning electron microscope.
Figure 5 provides what amounts to a control run
peak.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 11:37 AM
Looking closely at figures 5-8 of appendix 3 of the Lugano report, I
believe
we can see evidence for the evolution of a mass 69 species during
sputter-cleaning of the samples while undergoing
It seems clear that the thermography is way off - because the built in
inconel heater wires would fail at 1350°C. (The peak temp from
thermography is 1412°C). And the wires would necessarily be much hotter
than the external surface of the reactor - if they are wound tightly around
an inner core
-Max average Ecat temp recorded in test 1412°C, 2.8kW heat output.
- 20mm diameter, 200mm long, thermal conductivity of alumina 6W/m/K at
1400°C means for 1mm wall thickness would have 40°C through-wall temp
differential, for 2mm would be 80°C.
-So assuming 1mm wall thickness (probably
and temperature differences created by
natural convection could be modelled with CFD and would be a way to
validate the power output via radiation.
Still wishing they had done some simple air-flow calorimetry with a hood
and chimney instead.
On 12 October 2014 17:39, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l
He was the one that designed and built the
reactor, so he is/was the best choice to be the
one to cut it open and remove the charge. Seems
pretty logical to me. I guess maybe they ( the
scientist in third party test) just don't have
the same feeling that a lot of the pathoskeptics
have, and
1 - 100 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
