20, 2012 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
Without addressing anything else in this s message, I'll merely stay that
all reference to Islam and Muhammad is no sensual and reflects a degree of
ignorance that exceeds expectations.
OL
>
> So, Go ahead, continue the insults. I will give as much and much more than
> I can get. Christmas period is a slow time for me so I'll play along with
> your games. But come January, you can play with yourself.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Origi
along with
your games. But come January, you can play with yourself.
- Original Message -
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax"
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
Hah! I see that when I added the tag
At 06:23 AM 12/8/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
The pattern is obvious with this spinmiester. It's always elevating
some irrelevant aspect of the debate as if it were that important to
the discussion. A classic debate strategy I am aware of and quite
franky, being employed by lomax with great skill.
Hah! I see that when I added the tag to the subject, I mispelled Jojo Jaro
At 04:14 AM 12/8/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:

So, this libtard from Wisconsin claims that I do
not have emotional maturity and that I am 10 or
that I did not get feedback and all that
crap. O well, if I am a turd, w
And, anybody can confirm everything I've said here, if you don't consider
Wikipedia as your final authoritative source. LOL ...
----- Original Message -
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax"
To: ;
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this
pic posting.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
From Dave,
...
> J
>From Dave,
...
> Jojo has strong Christian beliefs that we all should respect. I am
> sure there are other religions represented here that should be
> equally treated.
Just to be clear, it is not Jojo's religious beliefs that I am challenging. It
is Jojo's inappropriate posting beh
At 02:37 PM 12/7/2012, you wrote:

As I've always said. Insults from me stop the
moment insults do not come my way.
He's said that, it's part of his "don't you dare mess with me" approach.
Below, I examine the history here to see if Jojo
actually does stop as he claims. He doesn't.
Inst
At 03:49 PM 12/7/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
10 for effort there spinmiester, self-appointed physics expert who
do not have a physics degree or any degree for that matter; and now
self-appointed arabic etymology expert.
Well, in physics I state the obvious, and I do as well so with
respect to Arab
t up yourself and have fun finding out the truth.
Jojo
- Original Message -----
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax"
To: ;
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
At 04:00 PM 12/5/2012, Jojo
since it certainly does not reflect well upon the members of vortex. Try
hard folks.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rob Dingemans
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Dec 7, 2012 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
Hi,
2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro trolling
>From Nature:
"On 1 January 2013, the world can go back to emitting greenhouse gases
with abandon. The pollution-reduction commitments that nations made as
part of the Kyoto Protocol will exp
>From Nature:
"On 1 January 2013, the world can go back to emitting greenhouse gases
with abandon. The pollution-reduction commitments that nations made as
part of the Kyoto Protocol will expire, leaving the planet without any
international climate regulation and uncertain prospects for a future
t
ecember 08, 2012 2:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
Hi,
On 7-12-2012 0:43, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
http://nameberry.com/babyname/Jojo
".full name for pet."
Sounds logical for someone who thi
: Rob Dingemans
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Dec 7, 2012 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jaro Jaro
trolling
Hi,
On 7-12-2012 0:43, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
h
Hi,
On 7-12-2012 0:43, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
http://nameberry.com/babyname/Jojo
"...full name for pet."
Sounds logical for someone who thinks he is "god" or it's delegate, as
it is also of course an anagram for "dog" ;-) .
Kind regards,
Rob
7;t know what to
feel. Angry and sorry.
Jojo
BTW, are you that white dog looking up at me (black dog)?
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -> about Jar
Abd,
Regarding the sacred meaning behind certain names I recently performed
scholarly work on the origins of the name "Jojo". My source was the Internet
where I get all of my facts. I want you to know that I employed a
considerable amount of personal discrimination in the pursuit of my
scholarl
At 04:00 PM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
A simple study that anyone can undertake will clearly reveal that
Al-Ilyah is the name of the moon god of muhammed's bediun tribe.
Well, I'd only seen this idea coming from wing nuts, but I took a
look. First of all, the idea is that the "Al-Ilyah" was e
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turning_the_other_cheek
Scriptural reference
The phrase originates from the Sermon on the Mount in the New
Testament. In the Gospel of Matthew, an alternative for "an eye for an
eye" is given by Jesus:
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, an
der you feel it justified to
issue fatwahs to kill those who "insult" muhammed-by telling the truth.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax"
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -&g
From: "Rob Dingemans"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
Hi,
On 5-12-2012 15:27, Vorl Bek wrote:
I seem to recall that Jojo has been called a 'bible fanatic' and
worse. Do you expect him to quietly put up with
: Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -- Jaro Jaro announces
intention to violate list rules
It is easy to see how wars are waged over religious beliefs...
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 06:43 AM 12/5
dense to get it.
- Original Message -
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax"
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -- Jaro Jaro announces
intention to violate list rules
At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I always s
every stupid word.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: "Vorl Bek"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
I seem to recall that Jojo has been called a 'bible fanatic' and
worse. Do you expect him to
Hi,
On 5-12-2012 17:04, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
The suppression problem arises easily ...
On cold fusion ...
That took more evidence.
Well said, and therefore free speech and support for it is so important.
If you see this (independent of your own political views) also as being
importan
It is easy to see how wars are waged over religious beliefs...
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
>
>>
>> I always say, I never start it, but I will finish it. An insult will be
>> responded with an insult. A ridicule with a ridi
It is up to the list owner whether or not to tolerate the continued
intense trolling for outraged response. Jaro Jaro has acknowledged,
in other posts, that he's going to give back what he gets, and he
readily exaggerates what he gets, and dredges up whatever he thinks
might offend everyone who
At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I always say, I never start it, but I will finish it. An insult
will be responded with an insult. A ridicule with a ridicule. This
bias will be responded with bias from me.
From his other posts, "finish it" includes continuing the "response"
long a
At 06:46 AM 12/5/2012, Rob Dingemans wrote:
There is no need for them to be threatened at all.
It is just a matter of what they are being told, taught and are
"believing" into something like the way a religious person does and
the workings of the human mind and clever use of psychology and med
I recently sed:
> ... Someone’s got to have the balls to simply say, this is enuf of
> this childish behavior.
This could be misconstrued as an indirect demand on my part directed
at Mr. Beaty to ban Jojo. My apologies to Mr. Beaty. That's not what I
meant when I uttered the above statement. I me
Hi,
On 5-12-2012 15:27, Vorl Bek wrote:
I seem to recall that Jojo has been called a 'bible fanatic' and
worse. Do you expect him to quietly put up with that kind of
insult?
What's wrong with calling somebody a "bible fanatic"?
It's just an opinion like any other and should not be treated as a
>From Vorl:
> I seem to recall that Jojo has been called a 'bible fanatic' and
> worse. Do you expect him to quietly put up with that kind of
> insult?
>
> If you don't like what he says, killfile him, but don't call for
> his banning because of his less than gentlemanly language;
> it makes thos
I seem to recall that Jojo has been called a 'bible fanatic' and
worse. Do you expect him to quietly put up with that kind of
insult?
If you don't like what he says, killfile him, but don't call for
his banning because of his less than gentlemanly language; it makes
those who do sound like hypocri
Hi,
On 5-12-2012 14:49, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Like others on this list, I filtered JoJo out of my Vortex-l account
long ago. I have my limitations.
Am not filtering anyone at all and sometimes see and read the postings
of such a "lost soul ;-) " as Jojo with lots of a
Like others on this list, I filtered JoJo out of my Vortex-l account long
ago. I have my limitations.
However if Jojo was recorded to have recently posted phrases like:
"What a piece of work you are. Your mother must have really screwed up
raising you."
For whatever reason JoJo may have
Hi,
On 4-12-2012 23:51, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It is not enough. You would have to show that hundreds of professional
climatologists are being threatened or harassed by these vested
interests the way McGuire was. Is that happening?
There is no need for them to be threatened at all.
It is just a
5, 2012 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
Jojo,
please moderate your wording and do not insult
any member of this rather old community. Wording has to be raised above the
kindergarten level, please try!
Please understand this is a New Energies forum, any other ad
*From:* Daniel Rocha
> *To:* John Milstone
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:02 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
>
> I think it is more practical to just ban Jojo.
>
>
> 2012/12/5 Daniel Rocha
>
>> I'm sorry. This is rath
t each of them.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
I think it is more practical to just ban Jojo.
2012/12/5 Daniel Rocha
I'm sorry. Thi
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20543483
Ice melt has finally been properly measured.
The results show that the largest ice sheet - that of East Antarctica - has
gained mass over the study period of 1992-2011 as increased snowfall added
to its volume.
However, Greenland, West Ant
How did this thread get so long so quickly? I'm impressed. :)
After all of that, did anyone's views on the topic change? :)
Eric
At 02:36 PM 12/4/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Of course, what is required to be an expert is often a matter of
great debate. . . ."
That last point is true, but not so much for hard science. There is
a world of difference between someone who has done the work it takes
to get a PhD versus an ama
I think it is more practical to just ban Jojo.
2012/12/5 Daniel Rocha
> I'm sorry. This is rather annoying anyway since I'd have to keep a list of
> the enmities.
>
>
> 2012/12/4 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
>
>> At 11:48 AM 12/4/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, damn! I talk about a possible correl
I'm sorry. This is rather annoying anyway since I'd have to keep a list of
the enmities.
2012/12/4 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
> At 11:48 AM 12/4/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> Oh, damn! I talk about a possible correlation between bible fanatics and
>> AGW denial and guess who appears 1 minute later! H
At 11:48 AM 12/4/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Oh, damn! I talk about a possible correlation between bible fanatics
and AGW denial and guess who appears 1 minute later! HA!
Daniel, did you really need to quote him? I've got the fellow in a
kill file (i.e, filter) so I don't read his mail normally.
, 2012 6:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
It should be obvious that there is politics involved in climate science. There
is just too much money and urgency involved. This means also corruption,
because science is not clear and it is very
Jed
I think it is safe to assume in most cases that the climatologists are
intelligent, hard working individuals. They are dedicated to doing the best
job they can with the tools and knowledge at their disposal and it would be
difficult to find a better group. I personally do not want anyone
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
It should be obvious that there is politics involved in climate science.
> There is just too much money and urgency involved. This means also
> corruption, because science is not clear and it is very difficult and
> everyone wants to see what the wish most.
>
Absolutely tru
ing
this logic?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
Zell, Chris wrote:
In regard to the power of the international banks and their scoff
Zell, Chris wrote:
**
> In regard to the power of the international banks and their scofflaw
> privileges, the extreme nature of the situation is kept out of the
> mainstream press. . . .
>
> Take the case of Andrew McGuire - who made the mistake of trying to expose
> silver trading manipulatio
ca as he destroys every American institution until we are all
slaves to commies and godless moon god worshippers.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Zell, Chris
To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com'
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 5:53 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:How bad is this new
David Roberson wrote:
> You seem to be a guy that likes to think through issues that are of
> importance as well. Perhaps you might want to consider the complexity of
> the global warming models for a moment. Do you honestly believe that the
> software guys have included all of the variables th
In regard to the power of the international banks and their scofflaw
privileges, the extreme nature of the situation is kept out of the mainstream
press. It would be too frightening for most people to know just how sociopathic
and immune to the law they are.
Take the case of Andrew McGuire - wh
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> I'm fully aware that "majority scientific opinion" can be defective --
> cold fusion demonstrates that, as did the fat/cholesterol hypothesis. If,
> however, one looks closely at these issues, one can find what Jed proposed.
> Those who actually were doing the resear
At 09:36 AM 12/4/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
People in a given field are sometimes biased against new ideas
proposed by outsiders. That is not because they are mistaken about
their own ideas. Their own ideas are valid, but the outsider's ideas
are an improvement. They oppose the ideas because --
4, 2012 2:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
David Roberson wrote:
It does not take a bible fanatic to question the global warming train wreck.
Some of us have worked with complex systems before and realize just how
difficult it is to separate out the various
sday, December 05, 2012 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
The primary reasons why the climate is not heating up faster than it has been
include oceanic thermal inertia and industrial negative aerosol forcing.
There is a lot of water in the ocean and there still
It is sad indeed to realize that politics and entrenched financial interests
dominate science - or what passes for it- but the notion that global warming
denial is just triggered by oil companies and the like is naïve. There are
powerful interests on the other side - and, in addition, because o
At 07:25 AM 12/4/2012, Robert McKay wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:02:33 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I will grant that in some cases, experts are blinded by their own
professional knowledge and by the bias of the field as a whole. That
is why many physicists do not believe in cold fusion. But the k
At 10:02 PM 12/3/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not know enough about climatology to place any bets, but based
on what I know about cold fusion and many other difficult areas of
science and technology, if I have to bet, I'll stick with the people
who do this for a living and who have been looki
arming caused by man.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Zell, Chris
To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com'
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 3:53 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
I sincerely hope that our civilization is prepared for a possible Carrington
The experts say that a temp rise of more than two degrees will be really bad.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Dec 4, 2012 2:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
David Roberson wrote:
It does not take a bible fanatic to question
David Roberson wrote:
It does not take a bible fanatic to question the global warming train
> wreck. Some of us have worked with complex systems before and realize just
> how difficult it is to separate out the various important parameters.
Unless you have worked with this particular complex s
I sincerely hope that our civilization is prepared for a possible Carrington
event - that could dwarf any global warming effects. Another point, not often
admitted is the possible influence of the TBTJ banks - which largely control
governments. They want to profit from running carbon tax/permit
Robert Lynn wrote:
Jed, the argument from authority approach with regard to climate change
> doesn't work because there are so many highly educated dissenting voices .
> . .
No, there are not many. Sorry, but that is not the case. I have read enough
about the controversy to ascertain this. Ther
xing powers over all of us as this will be the foot in the door that they
> always seek. We are an intelligent species and will eventually make the
> correct choices.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Rocha
> To: John Milstone
> Sent: Tue, Dec
the foot in the door that they always seek. We are an
intelligent species and will eventually make the correct choices.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Tue, Dec 4, 2012 11:48 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
Oh, damn! I talk
The primary reasons why the climate is not heating up faster than it has
been include oceanic thermal inertia and industrial negative aerosol
forcing.
There is a lot of water in the ocean and there still is loads of ice spread
around the world that can cool that water.
In the case of oceanic ther
ment though.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Daniel Rocha
> *To:* John Milstone
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2012 12:48 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
>
> Oh, damn! I talk about a possible correlation between bible fanatics a
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:43:59 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robert McKay wrote:
I dont doubt that.. the climatologists themselves arent going to
benefit
anacial reasons (ie. Research grants), but Jed is
> simply deluded, blind and biased for no reason at all. No amount of facts,
> statistics and/or sound experiments will convince a person like Jed, It a
> religion to these people.
>
> Jojo
>
>
> ----- Original Message --
It should be obvious that there is politics involved in climate science.
There is just too much money and urgency involved. This means also
corruption, because science is not clear and it is very difficult and
everyone wants to see what the wish most.
However, Jed is very right that overall ideas
n to these people.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: "Robert McKay"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:43:59 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robert McKay wrote:
I dont doubt that.. the clim
It's interesting that AGW denial and Christian creationism are cultural
phenomena which is more intensely seen among USA citizens than elsewhere in
the world, with a reasonably educated population. I wonder if there is
correlation between those.
Jed, the argument from authority approach with regard to climate change
doesn't work because there are so many highly educated dissenting voices,
so many examples of deficient analysis work in Climatology (check out
Climate Audit), and yet seemingly so little interest in improving woefully
bad scie
Weak anthropic principal at work. Nobody complained during last major ice
age because we were not around. We live at a privileged time.
Luckily, black holes suffer from indigestion which is why we are alive
today.
Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012, Robert McKay wrote:
> O
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:43:59 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robert McKay wrote:
I dont doubt that.. the climatologists themselves arent going to
benefit much either way (although Im sure many of them make a modest
livings out of it - and thats not nothing these days). Theyre merely
needed to produc
Robert McKay wrote:
I don't doubt that.. the climatologists themselves aren't going to benefit
> much either way (although I'm sure many of them make a modest livings out
> of it - and that's not nothing these days). They're merely needed to
> produce those tedious reports.. they just need to kee
Jed, I don't have a PhD in LENR either, but I believe it exists even
though the mainstream doesn't. Possibly my opinion is worth little.
The IPCC forecast has been falsified. It doesn't take a genius to
understand that. The link I gave to Lucia's site "The Blackboard" has
covered that in excru
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:36:50 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
IMO you dont need to know anything about climate science to
understand global warming - its all about politics and banking
(imagine a global economy underpinned by financial products where
the only underlaying deliverable . . .
Frankly, th
Robert McKay wrote:
>
> I will grant that in some cases, experts are blinded by their own
>> professional knowledge and by the bias of the field as a whole. That
>> is why many physicists do not believe in cold fusion. But the key
>>
>
> That's pretty much exactly the problem with climatologists
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:02:33 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I will grant that in some cases, experts are blinded by their own
professional knowledge and by the bias of the field as a whole. That
is why many physicists do not believe in cold fusion. But the key
That's pretty much exactly the problem
a.ashfield wrote:
>
> I have been following the subject fairly closely. I'm not about to start
> yet another discussion on AGW. I've written hundreds of posts on that
> already. That the IPCC forecast has been falsified for the average of the
> models and most of the individual models you can
Jed,
I have been following the subject fairly closely. I'm not about to
start yet another discussion on AGW. I've written hundreds of posts on
that already. That the IPCC forecast has been falsified for the average
of the models and most of the individual models you can read about on
Lucia'
a.ashfield wrote:
>
> Perhaps more to the point, global temperature has not risen for 16 years
> falsifying the IPCC forecast.
>
You may be referring to the UK Met data that supposedly showed no rise in
surface temperature. That is a mistake. The person who made that claim
chose the wrong starti
Unless you are a tree...
Trees will rule in the next Century...
I could not afford a beach house anyway...:)
On Monday, December 3, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> a.ashfield 'a.ashfi...@verizon.net');>> wrote:
>
> More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there would be no life on this planet.
>>
>
> W
even more interesting is with the microelements
as Cobalt, this was the subject of my wife's diploma work in Chemistry. but
many other elements are necessary for life.
Peter
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> a.ashfield wrote:
>
> More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there wo
a.ashfield wrote:
More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there would be no life on this planet.
>
Without salt in your body you would die. However, if you sat down and ate a
kilogram of salt, that would kill you. In biology, a substance that is
essential in one amount may be poisonous in a much lar
pm
Subject: [Vo]:How bad is this news?
More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there would be no life on this planet.
Perhaps more to the point, global temperature has not risen for 16 years
falsifying the IPCC forecast.
Six years ago, the story was there has been no temperature rise for 1
More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there would be no life on this planet.
Perhaps more to the point, global temperature has not risen for 16 years
falsifying the IPCC forecast.
Six years ago, the story was there has been no temperature rise for 10
years but that is not enough for a trend. You
Subject: more bad news
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/02/climate-change-study-emissions_n_2228646.html
93 matches
Mail list logo
