From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are
crazy
Straw Man argument.
First, the Hawaii authorities are the ones which automatically post all
births
in 1961, but as we
know wikipedia is far from complete.
mic
2012/8/8 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com:
Michele, two things:
First, the Immigration laws were a bit different in 1963. Stanley Ann
Dunham was too young to have conferred to Bambi U.S. Citizenship at that
time.
Second, Mere U.S
.
If that was you bringing in your newborn, would you not want your child
to be a US citizen?
I must confess, I have only looked at a limited amount of the arguments
and evidence about the whole issue, so am on the fence so far… perhaps
after the next election we'll find out? Or not…
-Mark
From: Jojo
Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one
are very interested in looking at this new theory.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Chemical Engineer
To: c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM
Jouni, I will have to take issue with your naive, simpleton, and bigoted
comment. You just insulted a whole range of people and I expect an apology.
Do you feel you are smarter than Isaac Newton - The father of Modern Physics
or Michael Faraday - The father of electromagnetism
or Louis Pastuer
Axil and others, What would it take to commercialize the Papp engine. In other
words, what else is needed in terms of development that still needs to be done
for the first commercial engine that I can buy from Lowe's. How much money
would it take for it to become a real engine that can drive
://www.rohnerengineering.com/pix/OurMBs.jpg
Cheers:Axil
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Axil and others, What would it take to commercialize the Papp engine. In
other words, what else is needed in terms of development that still needs to be
done for the first
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Abd, I appreciate your comments.
After reading your post below and rereading it and rereading it several
times, I am still at a lost on what you are contending. Please restate your
contentions in simpler prose
on
it. That's a lot of why we looking for life on other planets, other solar
systems and in extreme environments on earth. Amino acids have been found in
comet tails, they're really not that complicated.
Colin
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
You don't
ChemE, this is the first time I have read your Quantum Singularity theory. Do
you have a more comprehensive writeup of your theory?
How is the Quantum Singularity created in a lattice, when it is even difficult
to do so in the LHC with all its energies? Do you have a hypothesis on how
this
Ah, playing the race card again. I despise Donkeykong not because he's black
but because he is a liberal communist who wants to destroy America. For your
information, my favorite candidate was Alan Keyes not because he is black, but
because of his strong conservative Christian Values. Only
and
certainly we're not the best possible outcome for evolution. I think a planet
that failed to evolve an intelligent species may last longer than one that did.
Colin
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am familiar with genetic programming. Richard Dawkins
voicing your opinions about evolution etc., the
vortex is for an exchange of ideas, but could we get back on track. This week
and next are important weeks for LENR and these other discussions can wait.
Ransom
- Original Message -
From: Jojo Jaro
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
position is unwarranted and I hope will not be brought up
again.
I think that both of you are breaking at least one of the rules with this
unfortunate behavior.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 7, 2012 9
makes scientists think we are
crazy
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
PS. I do hope you get what you deserve up there in Wisconsin with the
new
Republican governor. I hope he gets you off your lazy, liberal, labor
union, welfare mentality. I just might
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fallacies of Darwinian Evolution - Genetic
Improbability
On 08/07/2012 10:11 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
We are so arrogant to think that humans are at the peak of development
today that we fail to see the declining status of our physical and
mental capacities.
Doesn't Darwinian
: [Vo]:The Fallacies of Darwinian Evolution - Genetic Improbability
Hi Jojo,
For sake of forum, and also to avoid frustration that comes from debating
with irrational people I am applying a filter to discard all messages from you.
Colin
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jojo Jaro jth
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fallacies of Darwinian Evolution - Genetic
Improbability
On 08/07/2012 11:59 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I believe the scores are increasing because of two things:
1. People are studying for the test; not because
-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 7, 2012 9:56 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are
crazy
Ah, playing the race card again. I despise Donkeykong not because he's black
but because he
:12 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alain, I hope you read my thread on Microevolution vs Macroevolution. The
resistance of bacteria to certain antibiotics and the bugs surviving
pesticides are the result of microevolution. In both instances, the
changes
appear to fast, to quickly
or
not. The bet was just an excuse.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are
crazy
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Jojo Jaro
or ridicule.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Alan J Fletcher
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are
crazy
At 07:39 PM 8/6/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Jed,
Obama was indeed
7, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Doesn't Darwinian Evolution say we should be improving?
Jojo
Nope. Where did you get that idea?
Harry
Improvement happens within a micro-evolutionary setting. Within a
macro-evolutionary setting there is just a history of changes
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are
crazy
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Baloney, I
Bruno, you need to be specific in your use of the word evolution. Yes, I
know that evolution occurs, I am not disputing that. But the evolution I
believe is happening is Mircoevolution, not Macroevolution or Darwinian
Evolution.
Please read my thread on Microevolutio vs. Macroevolution.
LOL, if these were the only faults of Donkeykong, it wouldn't be such a big
deal.
Fact is, Donkeykong is a usurper-in-chief. He violated and trampled on the
most basic law of our country. Donkeykong is a criminal and should be
removed, by force if necessary.
Jojo
- Original
You acknowledge that you called Birthers bigots and racists; and I am a proud
birther, so you just called me a racist and a bigot. No way to squirm out of
this.
A Birther is simply a person who believes in the rule of law. A president
should comply with the requirements of our Constitution.
: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are
crazy
Don't you think hat Donkey Kong, which is the name of a videogame ape, is a
bit racist?
2012/8/7 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
LOL, if these were the only faults of Donkeykong, it wouldn't be such a
big deal
makes scientists think we are
crazy
So, his name is no Barak Obama or similar? And you know the real name?
2012/8/8 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
I can't very well use his real name cause the secret service will be all
over me and do their intimidation routine.
- Original
In my continuing seris of Posts, I will touch on the issue of Genetic
Improbablity. The article below probably best describes this problem of
genetic improbability. The Paper is a well-cited paper and should be worthy of
sciencific acceptance from open minded folks here:
From The
or 100,000,000
1017 should be 10 raised to the 17 or 100,000,000,000,000,000
1031 should be 10 raised to the 31 or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
etc.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jojo Jaro
To: Vortex-l
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 4:18 PM
Subject: [Vo
design advocates. At least so you see both sides
and can make an intelligent choice.
Colin
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
This retrograde mailing system is screwing with my posts. The numbers are
not appearing correctly in the Web Interface and would
of Darwinian Evolution - Genetic
Improbability
At 03:18 AM 8/6/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
From The Myth of Natural Origins; How Science Points to Divine Creation
Ashby Camp, Ktisis Publishing, Tempe, Arizona, 1994, pp. 53-57, used by
permission.
Summarizing his and Hoyle's analysis of the mechanism
Jed,
Obama was indeed NOT born in Hawaii. If he was, why the fake Birth
Certificate? Why hide his Birth Certificate for so long?
Once again, I find myself having to correct your misinformation. You like
taking pot shots and insult those you disagree with, using these one liners.
Jojo
right. You seem to play with the stereotyped red-neck, those we
see in films and cartoons.
2012/8/6 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
Jed,
Obama was indeed NOT born in Hawaii. If he was, why the fake Birth
Certificate? Why hide his Birth Certificate for so long?
--
Daniel
: Saturday, August 04, 2012 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fallacies of Darwinian Evolution - Microevolution vs.
Macroevolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_creation_myths
2012/8/4 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
You can refer to all of these.
2012/8/4 Jojo Jaro jth
, we just don't really know enough about that right
now.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
You are not far off in your assessment of my position. I believe the field
of evolutionary biology and probably biology itself and all its subfields
don't really know enough about that right
now.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
You are not far off in your assessment of my position. I believe the field
of evolutionary biology and probably biology itself and all its subfields is
rife
with his need for the new version to conform to the ecclesiology and
reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an
ordained clergy.
You know about this things...true?
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes, I am
Steven, I am relunctantly engaging in these off-topic posts to make a point.
Since, you and Jed refuse to moderate your off-topic posts despite my numerous
pleas, I am now doing this to make a point and settle a bet with Terry. That
there is a double standard that exists in Vortex-L. If
Well, this is just one case wherein science has verified the accounts of the
Bible. There are many many many instances of this. The Bible is not a
book of Science but when it does make a statement about science, it has been
found to be true.
Did you know that the Bible says the Earth is
In remembrance and honor of Martin Fleischmann, I will suspend my posting
activity on other topics for a day.
I suggest everyone do the same to allow people to remember the great
contributions of Fleischmann.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To:
Hello gang,
In honor of my bet with Terry, this is my first post on the Fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution. Before I continue, I would like to lay the ground work
and define a few basic terms that we will be using in my series of posts.
Hopefully, people read this post so that I do not have
Yes, That is why I say Darwinian Evolution is dead, a totally discredited
and fallacious idea.Darwin did not know about DNA, genes, cell
structures, RNA and others.
Had he known the structure of DNA for instance, he would have concluded that
slow random mutation can not explain the
Soo,
No need to tell me how a fool I am and How smart you are. You think ID is a
religion, well I think Darwinian Evolution is a religion. If you think
otherwise, debate it. Stop wasting my time with these personal emails.
Jojo
PS. why should I read your link from an uninformed atheist.
of heat of fusion, but the local region becomes less random.
With this type of process in mind, I think that the choice of system
boundaries become critical.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 3, 2012 8:55 am
of
intelligent design:
Since God’s plan made infinite time and random fluctuations possible, so God
rightly gets credit for all the possibilities that these concepts engender; if
it has happened, then God must have done it.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
is virtually nonexistent in
the fossil record, and that stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello gang,
In honor of my bet with Terry, this is my first post on the Fallacies of
Darwinian
] as well as their
own empirical research. Eldredge and Gould proposed that the degree of
gradualism commonly attributed to Charles Darwin is virtually nonexistent in
the fossil record, and that stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jojo Jaro jth
Rex - Chicken Dinosaur
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j9O82J2Zow
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello gang,
In honor of my bet with Terry, this is my first post on the Fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution. Before I continue, I would like
as the genus Canis is.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello gang,
In honor of my bet with Terry, this is my first post on the Fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution. Before I continue, I would like to lay the ground work
and define a few basic terms
.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes, our genone (DNA) is complex, such that it is impossible to explain its
existence as a series of random accumulations of minute changes.
If anything, the presence of Information within our DNA should
how rapidly that life can evolve. For example,
bacterial pathogens evolve so nimbly that the drug industry cannot find a way
to kill them given their most earnest efforts to do so.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes given enough time Darwinian
Terry, once again this ambiguity is caused by our flawed definition of what
a species is.
Yes, there are changes within a species, it's called Microevolution or
Adaptation. But Macroevolution or Darwinian Evolution (changing from
species to another) is a discredited idea.
I contend that
Hello gang,
In this post I will define the difference between Microevolution vs.
Macroevolution. Yes, I believe evolution happens, I believe Microevolution
happens, not Macroevolution.
First, micro vs macro has nothing to do with the amount or number of changes.
That is, numerous micro
College in Portland, Oregon, told Science.
If someone creates a man from scratch, does that created man have a soul?
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Cool!!! Won't be long now until we get a complete catalog of each and
every DNA sequence of each
think this is totally off topic for Vortex
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello gang,
In this post I will define the difference between Microevolution vs.
Macroevolution. Yes, I believe evolution happens, I believe Microevolution
happens
larger units
until the entire genome is built.
How can simple chemistry procedure be a sin?
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Axil, since you are asking an ethical question that delves into religion
and the Bible, I will answer an answer from
that it claims to be.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fallacies of Darwinian Evolution - Basic Definitions
Le Aug 3, 2012 à 3:35 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com a écrit
Evolution - Microevolution vs.
Macroevolution
Jojo, haven't you said that you'd post an off topic thread for every thread
Jed posted? I think you are going beyond your promise. You cannot win the bet
without following the rules you established yourself.
2012/8/3 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
, August 04, 2012 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fallacies of Darwinian Evolution - Microevolution vs.
Macroevolution
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
PS. Absolutely, this is off-topic, but this is part of a bet. I am
betting
that a person who expresses
better than an intelligent design.
I think before you take this subject very far you really should do a bit of
study into genetics. Oh and take the blinkers off first.
Colin
PS I think this is totally off topic for Vortex
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
all other creation myths except for the
biblical one?
2012/8/4 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
I noticed that you have not actually said anything to counter what I
posted. No fact to rebut my post or the facts in my posts. Instead, your
strategy is one of obfuscation. That is, supply
Excellent Post from Mark and Bruno that highlights this Global Warming debate.
But you are spitting against the wind with Jed. There is no reasoning with him
as he has already made up his mind.
In Jed's mind, AGW definitely occurs and it is going to result in a Huge
Environmental
Jed, I have. The more I do, the more I realize Darwinian Evolution is a lie
and a fraud.
You see, over the years many neo Darwinists have been coming up with
explanations to plug the leaky holes of Darwin's original theory. Neo
Darwininism is now a hodgepodge conglomeration of increasingly
climate skeptic changes sides)
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Another $100 bucks says I will now be banned from this forum.
I'll take that bet. You have done nothing that I haven't done
regarding Darwinian Evolution, at least as far as Homo Sapiens
of Darwinian Evolution (Was::Koch founded
climate skeptic changes sides)
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
You're on my friend. Let's have lunch and discuss LENR when I get back
there.
Okay, but we have to set a deadline for your excommunication and payoff
Evolution (Was::Koch founded
climate skeptic changes sides)
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
OK, here's the deal. I will continue posting about the Fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution at the same rate that Jed posts his irrelevant
Off-topic
post. I estimate about
-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 29, 2012 8:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides
They can relocate to highlands. Bangladesh has some high lands you know.
Oh!, my heart bleeds for Florida
founded climate skeptic changes sides
Le Jul 30, 2012 à 12:36 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com a écrit :
Reality check people. Environmentalism and Global Warming hoopla is not
about catastrophe or overpopulation or unsustainability. It's about a growing
pantheistic religion movement
NO, I am not forcing down my beliefs, I am correcting a grave misinformation.
If I was mentioning Intelligent Design and implying that those who do not
believe in Intelligent Design were all somehow biased and stupid, everybody in
this forum would be all over my case. But that my friend is
, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Indeed it is getting silly Silly how people jam their beliefs of AGW
down your throat. There is NO AGW. But even if there was, as many people said
here, I'd rather have it warmer than colder. Colder weather is more
I believe you are the one being myopic. None of these effects you mentioned
below have been tied to any thing remotely associated with Warming.
Like you said, You got it from the Web. And we all know that the Web
contains all sort of correct information. There is absolutely nothing false
, at least my dog does not lie.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
None of these effects you mentioned
Look in the mirror Jed, YOU ARE the person you claimed to be disgusted of.
Tell me the truth. Have you even read Stephen Meyer paper on Specified
Complexity, or Frank J. Tipler's The Physics of Immortality. Both documents
contain hard hard science and hard hard hard math that would make
That's pure Balonium Jed, and you know it. Straw man argument. Utterly
useless and pointless.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides
Bruno
Jed, there is so much scattered baloney in your post that needs to be
corrected; but I refuse to drag Vortex-l down the pithole of irrelevant
off-topic posts.
Please post your comment in a different forum so that I can answer it.
Jojo
PS. I can't resist; so let me ask you this. What
You illustrate the kind of extremism and hyperbole that characterize the debate
over Global Warming?
Submerge Bangladesh? Get REAL
Even if Global Warming raises Ocean Level a few feet (Which is the worst case
scenario.) it won't submerge Bangladesh. But even if it does, it's about
Sometimes, you have a penchant for eliciting a chuckle or two from me.
Yes, Global Warming has been a recurrent theme of discussion in Vortex-l; yet
that does not mean it is a valid on topic post. Clearly, it is off-topic based
on Rule 2 of this forum. Just because you and Jed like to discuss
, July 30, 2012 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Even if Global Warming raises Ocean Level a few feet (Which is the worst
case scenario.) it won't submerge Bangladesh. But even if it does, it's about
time
LOL... I have always been very vocal with my Christian-Centric world view.
You think I was hiding in a closet?
Yes, absolutely, I believe that man should dominate all other creations of God.
It says so in the Bible, and I make no apologies about it.
What I would like to make apologies for
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 8:02 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Jojo Jaro does not make the rules here
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Just because you and Jed like to discuss a myriad of these off-topics does
not make it right.
On the contrary, whatever the members here decide
Baloney. While I am a patriotic American and I love all things American, I do
not for one second believe this utter nonsense.
The World is NOT heavily dependent on U.S. agriculture. The time where the
world depended on U.S. Agricultural output has long come and gone.
And has it actually
: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jojo Jaro does not make the rules here
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
If I do not make the rules, neither do you. In fact, we have the rules in
place. It's Rule 2, which you have
the law here
is Bill.
Whatever he decides, I will abide.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jojo Jaro does not make the rules here
Le Jul 29, 2012 à 6:11 PM, Jojo Jaro jth
Excellent Post Fran.
Does you theory provide guidance as to the shape, size, location and creation
mechanism of these Dynamic Casimir Cavities that support these mechanism?
Don't know if you have posted this before, if you have, it would still help
those of us who are
Rossi's new ecat core has got to be a Carbon Nanostructure-based NAE. No other
NAE structure can survive this temp.
1000C is the temperature where most metals start to sinter. When that happens,
kiss your lattice-based NAE goodbye. Your cracks will start deforming and
closing as atoms
Yes, but nickel starts to diffuse and sinter at temperatures not much higher
than 1000C. In sintering, you are not trying to melt the metal, but raise
the temps to a level that atoms start to migrate.
Whatever Nickel Lattice NAE you have would have been destroyed at these
temps as Nickel
Axil's post has prompted me to search for CNT rug methods and has led me to
this paper. Does anyone have access to this paper, and can you help. Direct
Growth of Aligned Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes on Treated Stainless Steel
Substrates
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/la7012232
I
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Axil's post has prompted me to search for CNT rug methods and has led me to
this paper. Does anyone have access to this paper, and can you help. Direct
Growth of Aligned Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes on Treated
Excellent post Axil. This was how I understood what you were saying from
earliere posts, that is why I was harping on the significance of why Rossi
changed to a Fat Cat design. To distribute sparking evenly.
Another thing that I am speculating is that Rossi is using a CVD process first
along to share details?
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jojo Jaro wrote:
Excellent post Axil. This was how I understood what you were saying from
earliere posts, that is why I was harping on the significance of why
Rossi
changed to a Fat Cat design. To distribute sparking evenly.
Another thing that I am
plugs but I've never seen one like those pictured.
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Harping on the Right Things!
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
Sorry. Double Post. I did not mean to repost this since I've already said it.
This is the BS of this retrograde Mailing System. If this were a forum, I
could have simply edited the post or deleted it. This email explaining that I
double posted should have been unneccesary.
Jojo
If DGT really had a reactor that is close to commercialization; that produce
commercial level power and temps, don't you think people will rush to
license their technology.
What happened to those groups that tested the reactor. Why aren't they
rushing to invest? Xanthoulis' statement seems
Peter, when someone has a technology that is as revolutionary as
Commercial-level LENR as DGT has, they cease to have this implied protection
anymore.
LENR is a symbol and icon of hope for many many people. DGT has a social and
ethical responsibility to address people's concern about it. If
The worst thing Rossi can do right now is to team up with these crooks
again. They'll just steal his IP and turn around and stab him in the back
again.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday,
of respect. Later, we might agree to hold them in contempt, but for now
lets cheer them on.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2012 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:principles of DGTG 's technology
Peter
Thanks for sharing your process. Interesting.
What is your proposed mechanism for the actual fusion? Do you have a
hypothesis?
I have done a similar process, but different, with no positive news to report.
The process I have tried involved the Mircrowave Sintering of Nickel and Copper
!
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
I believe you are mistaken. The round white end is the insulating ceramic.
If you look closely, you can barely see the protruding electrode. The ground
electrode can not be clearly seen. Either it can
301 - 400 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
