Hi Zack,
I filled out a survey request for "The Wiki Foundation".
Some of the text of the survey indicated that the legal department thought
that there could be a problem with that possibility, but didn't say why, so
I asked for the source for the claim I quoted in the survey.
How many questions
Anyone object to using loglan as an interlingua?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loglan
On Saturday, July 4, 2020, phoebe ayers wrote:
> Thanks Denny! I appreciate this, and your thoughtfulness as always.
>
> Thanks for starting an explicit discussion. I think our field (meaning,
> computer sci
Speaking of privacy policies, there are still way more than a hundred
accounts which have access to readers' IP addresses:
https://github.com/wikimedia/puppet/blob/be74f7d1e9fd5ad234c1049a66ddb8c36b3a8d48/modules/admin/data/data.yaml#L254
Given that the European Court of Justice found that the EU
Scott,
It is perfectly legitimate to be "anti-racist," but races are completely
artificial constructs. Racial conflict was interposed during the "tea
party" astroturfing in response to the Occupy movements:
https://www.reddit.com/r/occupywallstreet/comments/hyoogt/is_this_accurate/fze7t5c/
Do yo
Is the Foundation willing to fund pronunciation remediation this winter?
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020, Srishti Sethi wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Yes, mentoring organizations provide funding for the Outreachy internships.
> For the upcoming winter round, WMF will be funding up to 6 projects.
>
>
Wikimedia Australia has recorded their Board meetings, e.g. at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYnlRWxFpX0
If accurate minutes are too hard, this solution seems a lot easier.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/
>... board meetings are confidential so board members under duress can
> always claim they tried to do whatever they were told to but got voted
down?
Board votes are published.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki
> we could start with a smaller step: get the agenda
> published within 5 days after any meeting
"I would support as best practice the public posting of agendas for
routine board meetings. I would support that minutes be posted
promptly - but before the next meetings agenda is finalized is
Marc *Pelletier / Coren* wrote:
> I don't think it's reasonable to expect that every external supplier
> is all-FLOSS. For one, the movement would be pretty much stuck
> without hardware, networking gear, and power at the very least.
Is there a list of equipment that WMF uses without viable FLOSS
Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
>... as far as I know, high-end networking hardware is not
> available with Libre OSes
Are the FreeBSD-based pfSense C2758 series in the Foundation's throughput tier?
https://www.pfsense.org/products/product-family.html#c2758
https://portal.pfsense.org/docs/manuals/c275
Hi Olatunde,
All the WikiProjects are individually responsible for accuracy, because of
Good Article criteria 2 and 3 taken together. However, I agree with your
sentiments.
Please see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Update_Watch (inactive)
https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Accurac
Re https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/publicpolicy/2016-April/001335.html
Should the Foundation mount a campaign to rescue BOLT from whomever
took it down from the DARPA site?
"The Broad Operational Language Translation (BOLT) program is aimed at
enabling communication with non-English-speakin
> we have absolutely no idea ... about the technological
> stack [or] how much progress was made
Can anyone think of another way to find out?
> covert HUMINT or surveillance technology
If we publish the code, it's not covert anymore. We all deserve to see the
mentions of Wikipedia which occu
/corres/pdf/523030m.pdf
If I am mistaken or if anyone thinks it is not a good idea to ask for
this, please let me know.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:53 AM, James Salsman wrote:
>
>> we have absolutely no idea ... about the technological
>> stack [or] how much progress was made
> You're suggesting that counsel spend their time writing to
> agencies ... when we know almost nothing about them.
Again, if there is another way to find out, I'd like to learn it.
>> Therefore I think it would be worth writing a letter asking that the
>> BOLT, SMISC, and CSFV be returned to ope
How do people feel about a few of the larger the Chapters funding pilots to
have professional researchers do https://tools.wmflabs.org/citationhunt/en
and a few other main languages?
It would be great to measure the quality of results of different payment
incentive models and rates, but this is no
>
> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
...
> I categorically oppose paying people for content. Enabling them to create
> content is different. Citations is content and its quality is relevant but
> only that.
Why categorically? We already pay hundreds of people for work in support of
the projects, includ
bvious benefit, it would destroy what we are and
> how we do things for no obvious benefit.
As long as we don't measure the benefit, we have no way to know whether
it's positive and will forever remain non-obvious.
> On 23 April 2016 at 16:02, James Salsman wrote:
>
> >
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> The one reason why we would pay it is because the industry that prevents
> people from finding citations is morally corrupt
We need randomized anonymous double blind review for anything like this to
be suitable for paid proofreaders.
Frankly, the category selecto
Dr. Heilman wrote:
>... we need someone who has excellent communication and people skills.
> Technical skills can be hired for at other levels of the organization while
> people skill cannot typically be taught.
>
> Katherine, our current interim ED, appears to have these qualities. If
> she is [i
t;is not likely to hire someone involved in
anticompetitive labor market abuse crimes."
Best regards.
Jim
-- Forwarded message ------
From: *James Salsman*
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Subject: Sue too! (was Re: please keep Katherine)
To: "edsea...@wikimedia.org"
Ca
Both of the two messages below got encouraging responses off-list, but I
doubt they will get Foundation support without wider discussion, and they
certainly both transcend mere Foundation public policy advocacy concerns.
Please share your thoughts!
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed
Dan Garry wrote:
> Reaching out to [Google] is the easiest and quickest way to get
> these kinds of issues fixed
Google is a whole lot better than Altavista was back when their
snippets were taken from title and meta tags or the first words
on the page, but there have been some issues that th
ld be informed, respectively.
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Salsman
Date: Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Publicpolicy] WMF Transparency Report
To: Publicpolicy Group for Wikimedia
Very impressive, Jan!
Were the five requests for content removal based on the
Jan,
Regarding my questions on https://transparency.wikimedia.org/
below, it has been three weeks since I forwarded them to you.
Would you please answer them?
Were the five requests for content removal based on the right to be
forgotten included in the 243 requests to alter or take down content?
I propose that the Foundation hold a symposium inviting the authors of
the following four papers to give a joint talk on formal scholarly
reputation in tenure decision:
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.pdf
http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to-normalize-cita
It's great that the CTO position was filled.
The blog announcement's biography omitted these details:
"As Director for Security Initiatives for Intel’s Digital Enterprise
Group [Victoria Coleman] was responsible for defining the company’s
security technology roadmap and translating it to product
Are there any disadvantages to a warrant canary which would outweigh the
corresponding expected increase in improvements from anonymous editors?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/canary-watch-one-year-later
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary
_
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> There are two conflicting approaches to vulnerabilities known
> to"government"; vulnerabilities make government vulnerable
> and therefore they need to be handled properly in code. The
> other approach is that a vulnerability is a vector to attack
Well, the general
Katherine Maher wrote:
>
>... If you have further questions about Victoria’s work with the U.S.
> Department of Defense, it is/should soon be a matter of U.S.
> Congressional record. Her findings and recommendations will also
> be a matter of public record, as all government work should be.
> Howev
Does Guideline 3 of https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:
Guidelines_on_potential_conflicts_of_interest
include questions from the community?
Is it ever appropriate to try to negotiate limits to answers to such
questions in private communications?
"Best solutions to avoid conflict of i
Leila Zia wrote:
>... we are not aware of any reader logs being shipped out of the
> WMF servers.
Page 20 of http://infolab.stanford.edu/~west1/pubs/West_Dissertation-2016.pdf
says, "We have access to Wikimedia’s full server logs, containing all
HTTP requests to Wikimedia projects." Page 19 indica
Dario,
I assumed that when an affiliated researcher apart from Foundation
staff says, "we have the complete server logs for Wikipedia,"
amounting to 17 terabytes per month, that means they possess the
information. I am glad to be wrong about that, but I object to the
implication that such an assum
Dario Taraborelli wrote, in reply to my question:
>>...
>> Is there any legitimate research or any other need to save IP
>> addresses associated with HTTP GET web logs to disk prior to
>> creating a secure hash of them?
>
> these are considerations that the analytics / ops team are best suited to
>
>> storing the geolocation of every reader request is not within
>> the letter or the spirit of the Foundation's privacy policy,
>> which explicitly requires consent for the use of geolocation
>
> No, this is not correct. The reasons why this statement is
> incorrect have already been discussed in
Here are questions pertaining to policies. I am glad to have the
opportunity to step back and consider these over the long term:
1. When interpreting the neutrality mandate with regards to candidates, but
policy implies support of specific candidates or candidate-associated
action, how are we supp
Christophe,
Are there any plans and is there any budget and headcount to
measure the effectiveness of the recommendations in Figure 51
on page 46 of
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Harassment_survey_2015 ?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guideli
Over the past decade, the Foundation's low rate of return on
investments has been dismal and embarassing, in part because it
reflects poor choices in the use of donors' money and sets a terrible
example. The ease with which the Foundation can raise funds is simply
not compatible with purchasing 1.5
James Heilman wrote:
>
> I personally invest in stuff that gives 1.5% to 1.7% returns
Whether you call it fake news, disinformation, public relations,
manufactured consent, astroturfing, propaganda, or simply clever
advertising campaigning, bankers are thrilled when people think such
returns a
> Regarding the external expert for inclusive process you are looking for,
> maybe this article is of help:
>
> https://hbr.org/2016/12/how-employees-shaped-strategy-at-the-new-york-public-library
What did the New York Public Library do that the Foundation doesn't
already do in their ordinary cour
I am forwarding my reply to Luis on the Public Policy list here
because the request is for both individual and corporate responses.
-Jim
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Salsman
Date: Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Publicpolicy] U.S. Copyright Office seeks
I was very glad that the Foundation decided to extend the fundraiser.
I think adding projects outside of the lengthy, formulaic,
overly-committee laden, but necessary in part FDC funding process and
getting a head start on the endowment is essential for retaining the
soul of the Foundation's tradit
Christophe, I agree with your statements:
> That resolution provides staff the liberty to do their work more
> efficiently. It doesn't remove our duty of oversight.
Would a requirement to publish policy changes at least, say, a month
before they go into effect along with a complete rationale allo
Although it is probably something innocuous such as a recent need to
moderate all comments by default, I am disappointed that my comment on
the recent Wikimedia blog post which I belive should be at
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/01/06/rethinking-digital-property-yale-isp/#comment-124999
has sti
Does anyone doubt that the English Wikipedia's longstanding,
pervasive, counter-factual, systemic bias towards supply side
trickle-down austerity libertarian objectivist economics due at least
in part to early influence of editors attracted to Jimmy Wales' former
public positions isn't at least par
he controversy is still ongoing but slowly turning in favor
of the MEDRS literature's position:
http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/latest-news
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:39 AM, James Salsman wrote:
> Does anyone doubt that the English Wikipedia's longstanding,
> pervasiv
>... there is zero chance that the president will be able to censor
> the private sector.
If you mean the U.S. private sector, you're right. But otherwise, the
U.S. President is allowed to take a whole lot of actions which can
effectively censor non-citizens, and I've got some bad news pertaining
> there are a lot of resources based in the US that may
> need to be distributed on a wider base including
> personal/private data already collected by the WMF
For editors, but not readers. On November 8 a top
foundation official tweeted that the Foundation would
not store personally identifying i
Should the Foundation take a position on a general strike?
https://twitter.com/trevortimm/status/825395993789157376
https://twitter.com/ericgarland/status/825403294667436033
I know this is an unusual question, but when is the last time that the U.S.
judiciary has deployed Federal Marshals agains
> No. This is very much a case where the foundation sits and waits.
Please take this survey: https://plus.google.com/+jsalsman/posts/HPav2YWUag3
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, James Salsman wrote:
> Should the Foundation take a position on a general strike?
>
> https://twitter.co
> I'm alright with the WMF taking a position on issues when they're likely to
> have a serious impact on the core mission of Wikimedia.
> I fail to see how this is one of those things
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Director of National
Intelligence have just been replaced on
I just spoke with Gerard Meijssen, who gave me permission to quote him
saying that both censorship of the internet and travel of Foundation
employees are within the scope of the issues impacting the Mission,
and that he has posted here with more information:
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017
https://www.yahoo.com/news/canada-offers-temporary-home-those-stranded-trump-order-221401138.html
I strongly disagree that Bannon is not a if not the primarily
responsible party for both the SSL certificate revocation threats and
the travel ban:
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/steve-bannon-person
> I hope the above is quite off-topic for this list.
I was told that several Wikimedia Foundation employees have been asked
to refrain from travel, including at least one who is away from their
family. If I am mistaken, I apologize.
___
Wikimedia-l mail
/forget_protest_trumps_actions_warrant_a_general/
(Except for the Lyft part, because one of its founders is on the
adminstration's transition team.)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:38 PM James Salsman wrote:
Is this more appropriate for the Public Policy or Wikimedia-l list?
http://www.slat
Why are proposals to abandon the US being given more consideration than
those to address the underlying issues?
And from those who have been so concerned about the frequency of discussion
on this topic (amongst dozens of redundant crongradulatory messages which
have never in a dozen years resulted
I can not in good conscience refrain from asking the Foundation management
and Board to please take an exceptional, public, very visible stand in
response to these extraordinarily exceptional circumstances.
Top officials from the US and China say war between the nations is "no
doubt" a "reality."
Thyge, Craig, Dan, Rogol, Max, Neil, Mike, Ryan, Pete, Yair, and
Leigh, here are some questions I'd like you to answer, neither of
which are rhetorical:
First, what attracts you to the free culture movement?
What freedoms do you personally hold as ideal?
Finally, what does the Foundation's Missi
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:15 AM Yair Rand wrote:
> The Guidelines on Foundation Policy and Political Association
> established by WMF Legal for internal use, specifically bring up the
> issue of "public endorsement or critique" of political policies, listing
> several requirements for doing so, an
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Bill Takatoshi wrote:
>
>... I am sending these links without James's commentary
The part that was deleted from what I had asked to be forwarded
basically said this:
Some of the most senior and respected Foundation leaders have pointed
out that fascist regimes
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Bill Takatoshi wrote:
>
> I have no suggestion for what a banner might say, but I would like to
> see such proposals from others.
I propose: http://i.imgur.com/3Fb8Zrr.png
Sincerely,
Jim Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing
>> The people who are loudest in their demands for consensus
>> do not represent the Wikimedia movement.
>
> The voices loudest for the WMF doing something against the
> Trump administration are not representative of the Wikimedia
> movement either
Is the Community Process Steering Committee c
The Foundation doesn't have a product roadmap because new product goals are
updated at least once a year; more often internally. A roadmap as described
in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_roadmap is appropriate when long
term plans are under centralized control and not subject to change. The
Regarding
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/02/13/niels-christian-nielsen-endowment-board/
What have the funds of the organizations Nielsen manages returned? Have
they matched the returns of commercial endowment-grade mutual funds? I
refer to my comments here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/
If Harald Bischoff has defrauded Commons reusers by requiring stricter
attribution than the community requires, does the Foundation have standing
in Germany to require him to return the money to his victims in proportion
to the extent that their attribution was improper?
___
>... The license requires only that the credit "be implemented in
> any reasonable manner". [Also note that the _text_ of our projects,
> while also licensed under CC-BY-SA, is licensed in way that
> explicitly states that a sufficient attribution is "[t]hrough hyperlink
> (where possible) or URL t
One thing the Foundation could do to help with climate change and
water issues other than move office locations, and which is on topic
because the Foundation has chosen to purchase renewable energy through
contracting with suppliers in the past, is if the Foundation attempted
to secure desalinated
Hi Giles,
I regret I will probably not be available for the IRC office hours as scheduled.
In the discussion of shared hosting, I worry that en:User:Dispenser's
reflinks project, which requires a 20 TB cache, is being forgotten
again. He tried to host it himself, but it's offline again. This data
Were there any objections to my request below?
Can we also please hire additional database, system, and if necessary
network administration support to make sure that the third party spam
prevention bot infrastructure is supported more robustly in the future?
On Monday, December 14, 2015, James
On Sunday, December 20, 2015, Brian Wolff wrote:
> If you want to get Dispenser his hard disk space, you should take it
> up with the labs people, or at the very least some thread where it
> would be on-topic.
>
The labs people are so understaffed that two extremely important anti-spam
bots rece
orded. The Foundation does that for monthly meetings, why not the Board
too?
Regards,
Jim
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, James Salsman wrote:
> On Sunday, December 20, 2015, Brian Wolff > wrote:
>
>> If you want to get Dispenser his hard disk space, you should take it
>> up with
or this appointment should also resign immediately. There
is absolutely no reason that the Foundation should even present the
appearance of endorsing such attacks on technology workers.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, gu
Re
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Strategy/Community_consultation#The_questions
and given
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Strategy_consultation_qualitative_comment_categories.png
was already published from previous answers, I prefer to answer here:
> What major trends would you ide
> How are we going to address this in the future? We will basically start
> asking that.
If the Board of Trustees was entirely elected by the community would
solve the background check problem, even if those elections remain
technically just nominations which the sitting board can approve or
rejec
Given the initial attribution of the Foundation Board of Trustees
indicating that they considered the appointment of an anti-competitive
hiring blacklist enforcement manager as a "public relations check"
problem, I recommend that Foundation employees immediately join the
Union for Non-Profit Worker
SarahSV wrote:
>
>... how does a tech organization nurture and support its unpaid
> workforce of mostly writers and researchers?
I remain convinced that http://wikimedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_review can
solve this problem through a new spinoff such as WikiEd Foundation,
but that's still probably at le
Sorry, http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Accuracy_review
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:59 PM, James Salsman wrote:
> SarahSV wrote:
>>
>>... how does a tech organization nurture and support its unpaid
>> workforce of mostly writers and researchers?
>
> I remain convinced tha
At this juncture, I would like to repeat my recommendation that
Foundation employees to immediately join the Union for Non-Profit
Workers, IFPTE Local 70:
http://ifptelocal70.org/home/
Furthermore, the discussion concerning innovative ways to fund the
best long term editors through, for example,
Where does the idea that user interface changes to the system which
has already produced the most monumental reference work in the history
of humanity are going to help with its only actual problem, that
people aren't sufficiently inclined to stick around and maintain it?
If there was any evidence
Today the Society of Professional Journalists updated its Code of
Ethics in two ways pertinent to wikimedians and Wikimedia projects:
1. The term "journalist" has been replaced with references to
"journalism" in areas that were seen to perpetuate the idea that the
practice of journalism requires o
Wil Sinclair wrote:
>
> Flow needs a deep and broad community consensus
> to what would probably amount to the biggest single
> change in the history of the project for the day-to-day
> collaboration amongst editors that is so vital to our success.
Wouldn't it be easier to achieve such consensus i
In the recent discussion of editor engagement effectiveness on
wiki-research-l, the question of Flow's affect on talk page wikitext
practice arose. I would like to know whether anyone shares my concern that
eliminating wikitext talk pages will remove what has, for the past few
terabytes of edits, s
Wil Sinclair wrote:
>...
> I'm wondering if there is a place where the lighter side of
> individual Wikimedians ... stuff like funny stats about our
> wikiprojects surfaced through clever metrics, the weirdest
> of the weird factoids that we uncover in the process of
> documenting our universe, int
ta showing that creating new articles is more fun
than maintaining old ones, so we might want to figure out how to pay
people to maintain them.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_
Re the request for discussion about the product roadmap during the
metrics meeting at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJGC9zpbJpU&t=1h06m30s
Do Foundation officials intend to address supporting article accuracy review?
I have asked several specific questions about
https://strategy.wikimedia.org/w
--
From: "James Salsman"
Date: Sep 12, 2014 10:03 AM
Subject: will the WMF review advocacy strategy?
To: "Advocacy Advisory Group for Wikimedia" <
advocacy_advis...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Stephen,
>
> Does the Foundation intend to review the extent to which its advo
ender-inclusive cryonics
solutions. I understand that supercooling vitrification freezers such as
those manufactured by ABI, Ltd. of Chiba, Japan called CASfresh or Cells
Alive System may be of some interest.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l ma
with fuschia text on a epileptic
seizure-inducing background and auto-play audio than have the
fundraising director claim that donations are decreasing to help
justify "narrowing scope."
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing l
Are there any surveys of active female editors which have asked how
they started editing?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wi
Please get Python and/or PocketSphinx help for Wikiversity to absorb
http://www.wiki.xprize.org/Meta-team#Goals
systems in a manner similar to how Wikiversity incorporated Moodle. Form an
Xprize team before the March deadline just in case.
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Develop_syste
ned. Please consider giving back by co-mentoring the accuracy
review GSoC proposal. It shouldn't take more than a few hours per
week over the summer.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.o
I stick my neck out to
fight for people who are getting the short end of the stick, and
causing their own organizations, whether they be foundations or
nations, to be less effective because of it, and I'm proud I am one of
the very few who do.
On Saturday, 14 February 2015, James Salsman wrot
> when "ticketed", this is usually to control numbers when
> space is limited. This model works pretty well and makes them
> popular events; indeed, they're one of our most visible public activities.
> I don't see where the benefit would come from selling - or raffling,
> auctioning, etc- tickets.
WMF from legal liability due to
inaccuracies. I am sad when dictatorships use Wikipedia Zero for propaganda
purposes, but I am not sure how much of a problem that is relative to the
advantages.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidel
://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2015-May/031684.html
I have a new contract through the end of the year and will be unable to
devote the time I had planned. Thank you.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at
http://www.euractiv.com/sections/health-consumers/new-law-muzzle-whistleblowers-315357
Wasn't there some time a few years back when the PCI consortium and some
~40 digit hexadecimal number were making Philippe have to do around doing
revels or such? Can we vote against that please?
___
GerardM,
Which do you think would end more language discrimination: a WMF
co-headquarters in Belgium, moving the WEF to Germany, or a Simple language
Wikipedia for the top-25 languages?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia
James Heilman wrote:
> We need to make our current Wikipedias simpler. Yes I know it is
> an uphill battle but we just need more people working on it.
That is why, as I have announced previously, I will soon begin raising
money for the human fact-checkers and proofreaders necessary for the
http:/
curacy contrary to the peer reviewed secondary
literature, many examples of which still exist in the English
Wikipedia.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/m
ich is a surprisingly common view among Stanford's
Hoover Institution-sponsored staff, their relatives, and alumni. See also
the proportion of Americans who disbelieve evolution, vaccines, and
radioisotope dating.
Best regards,
James Salsman
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, James Salsman wrote:
201 - 300 of 483 matches
Mail list logo
