Dear Marc, this is exactly the problem: focusing only on toddlers and on
on-site solutions. when what parent need is focusing on the general problem of
childcare wether on the site of wikimania or not.
-Natacha
> Le 11 nov. 2016 à 15:56, Marc-Andre a écrit :
>
> FWIW,
Hoi,
Right. I agree. It is vital for us to have a safe space where we have our
conference. When we assess a place we should indeed do a risk assessment.
This risk assessment is for all of us. It means that we have to be safe to
do our thing at the conference, we have to be safe at our digs, we
Greetings,
I wanted to take off my Wikimedia Foundation hat for a moment and offer
some thoughts as a fellow volunteer.
Without feeling physically/emotionally/mentally safe and free from
prosecutorial persecution, it is nearly impossible to actively engage.
Therefore, no goals can be achieved if
"Foreigners" are at an increased risk regardless of where they travel thats
the reality of international travel, additionally each persons individual
circumstances will affect those risks. What we shouldnt be doing is
engaging in a contest as to whos circumstances gives them the greater risk
and
It is correct I have yet to attend a Wikimania conference, but was
planning to after my positive experience presenting at WikiConference
North America.
Please note the "Muslim" and "LGBT" are not mutually exclusive. Same
with any other marginalized groups you might name.
FYI my preferred
om: Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
Sender: "Wikimedia-l" <wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org>Date: Thu, 10
Nov 2016 09:00:13
To: Wikimedia Mailing List<wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hoi,
Exactly. It is the whole community that meets and it is regularly in a
different country because in this way we have been in all continents but
Australia and it has been wonderful to see the different outlook from the
local Wikipedians. When Wikimania is not about outreach we could have it
I see the primary point of Wikimania as an opportunity for the community to
meet in person once a year. Many important initiatives for our movement
have grown out of Wikimania including but not limited to: Wikivoyage, the
copyright detection bot, our collaboration with the World Health
Hoi,
In that case what is the point of Wikimania.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 10 November 2016 at 14:25, Andrew Lih wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Gerard Meijssen <
> gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hoi,
> > You do not get it. Wikimania is first and
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> You do not get it. Wikimania is first and foremost about spreading the word
> about what we do and who we are.
>
{{citationneeded}}
The reality is Wikimania is largely a community event first, with the
+1
On 10 November 2016 at 09:00, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> You do not get it. Wikimania is first and foremost about spreading the word
> about what we do and who we are.
>
> I have read Pax's original post. He did not go to Wikimania. He asks for
> consideration
Hoi,
You do not get it. Wikimania is first and foremost about spreading the word
about what we do and who we are.
I have read Pax's original post. He did not go to Wikimania. He asks for
consideration that any Wikimania will be in a place where he feels safe. It
is OK for him to ask this but it
Gerard,
Yes you are being offensive. You are deliberately painting a picture
that somehow Pax, myself and others are attempting to make out that
safety of LGBT+ Wikimedians is more important than safety of Women
Wikimedians or the safety of Muslim Wikimedians. The only person doing
that is you.
Hoi,
The notion of offence is one where you take it where there is none
certainly no offence is intended.
When you consider Wikimanias past, we have been to places where there is a
"risk". Arguably there has been a risk in going to other countries in the
past. When you consider the events
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> Not going to North Corolina is absolutely fine with me. We do not gain
> anything by going there arguably not to any state in the United States.
> What Wikimania is, is a platform for propaganda for what
Gerard,
You have posted several emails on the subject which read as
disrespectful, can cause offence and discourage LGBT+ contributors to
this list who may have otherwise openly expressed views. The line of
argument that LGBT+ Wikimedians must expect to be at personal risk
just to attend a
Hoi,
What is the point. When not even the USA is "safe", we have to be
realistic. Wikimania is about propaganda for what we do. We have to travel
and selecting a place is not about you, it is about them. It is about the
people we aim to serve.
I made my point before, it did not get any attention
Gerard, as a queer black trans person who feels unsafe even in San
Francisco (and has felt that way for years), I would really appreciate
you not pushing last night's election results in my face to make a point.
- Pax
On 11/9/16 8:24 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Do you blame me for not
Hoi,
Do you blame me for not feeling safe going to the USA?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 8 November 2016 at 11:08, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> Not going to North Corolina is absolutely fine with me. We do not gain
> anything by going there arguably not to any state in
Hoi,
Not going to North Corolina is absolutely fine with me. We do not gain
anything by going there arguably not to any state in the United States.
What Wikimania is, is a platform for propaganda for what we have, what we
do, who we are and how we do what we do. In many countries Wikipedia is not
With all due respect Pax... whilst I am fully in agreement with the
concept of selecting a country with the safety of ALL participants in
mind, I totally disagree with the concept of selecting a country based
on "high human records" generally.
We are not serving the part of humanity that has
We can share knowledge without meetings, we cannot share knowledge without
our community. If some of our community cannot be safe well...who cares of
meetings then?
Vito
2016-10-18 15:26 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen :
> Hoi,
> For me safety is to a large extend secondary
Gerard, this isn't about "holiday destinations", it's about human rights
and dignity. That's why I emphasized in my original post that I'm
concerned not only about the safety of conference attendees, but also
about those living in the host country. The choice of a venue in a
location with a
Hoi,
For me safety is to a large extend secondary to what we aim to achieve. Our
primary goal is to improve on our primary goal and it is "sharing in the
sum of all knowledge". It is not for going to the perfect holiday
destination.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 October 2016 at 13:56, Fæ
Gerard, could you provide some tangible examples of how other safety
aspects of Wikimania would be compromised if there is any specific
attention paid to the safety of LGBT+ Wikimedians? I cannot imagine
how such a thing could be true.
Based on my reading, nobody in this thread has asked for the
IMHO we should divide criteria into two categories, reflecting two
different kind of issue:
*someone *cannot* partecipate because of a certain issue -> the proposal is
rejected
*someone may not feel comfortable in partecipating -> the proposal is
somehow penalized
In other words, if LGBT people
Hoi,
I do care that everybody can come to places where they are safe. All the
specific LGBT attention to safety is however on many levels problematic
when we prioritise this over other safety aspects. The big picture for me
is that we need to go to places where bringing Wikipedia and what it
Ellie, thanks for the response. Could the criteria you mention be
published on-wiki? Holding an open and transparent process for
selecting host locations for Wikimania should be a requirement on the
selection committee, so there ought to be nothing stopping this from
happening. If the applied
Thanks Ellie.
On the topic of event safety, I am wondering if there is a standard
checklist that WMF uses when narrowing potential sites for Wikimanias and
if you could make that checklist public. Perhaps it is public already but I
don't know where to find it.
Regarding Wikimania goals and
Yes we are doing a review and I can vouch that issues like this will always
be a part of the criteria when selecting a venue. In most of the recent
Wikimanias the selection committee and WMF have included the security of
our LGBT community as one of the criteria when considering bids.
Another
There are two aspects in this situation. We have the law and we have the
enforcement. We know that most of ME countries have laws against LGBT
people and actively enforce it but for example in India even though there
is a law but it's not being enforced. On the other hand in North Carolina
(and
Agreed, that link is just a broad overview. There are many other pages
that drill down to specific laws and policies of regions and cities that
affect the safety of LGBT+ people. From Amir Ladsgroup's reply it does
sound like the Wikimania committee is aware of these issues and taking
them
Hi,
I suppose that it should be a group of people to give relevant reasons
and to be more proactive when selecting a bid mainly if connected with a
poor respect of rights or with the safety of some specific diversities.
The link you give is more related to the rights than to the safety of
Hi Pax,
My understanding is that WMF is doing a strategic review of Wikimania. If
that is correct, considerations like the ones you raise about location
could be included in the scope of that review. I'm pinging Ellie with the
hope that she can provide information about the status of WMF's
Thanks Anna. I forgot to include this relevant link (which I also posted
in the Facebook discussion):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_by_country_or_territory
- Pax
On 10/16/16 10:14 AM, Anna Stillwell wrote:
These are lovely suggestions / requests. Thank you for raising them. I'm
These are lovely suggestions / requests. Thank you for raising them. I'm
happy to hear of your positive experience at WikiConference.
+1
/a
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Pax Ahimsa Gethen <
list-wikime...@funcrunch.org> wrote:
> Hello all. I had a positive experience at WikiConference North
Hello all. I had a positive experience at WikiConference North America
last weekend, where I gave a talk on transgender issues and
Wikipedia.[1] I'm posting because there's an active discussion in
Wikipedia Weekly on Facebook about choosing a host country for Wikimania
2018.[2] I am concerned
37 matches
Mail list logo