owireless.net>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 10:23:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers
Torrent traffic is less than 1% of our network traffic. It's never been a big
deal for us like it probably once was.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:1
ubject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
I would agree with Adair, Torrent is a non-issue for us. We have seen more
complaints from Windows Update and Xbox Live Updates impacting customers
connections, meaning they call in and say “I am paying for 20 Meg service and
when I r
Darin Steffl" <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers
Dan,
You have to understand if you're selling a residential internet package, it is NOT dedicated. There has to be some over
ur marketing and service plans.
As as they say, live by the sword, die by the sword.
Jared
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 8:07 PM
From: "Vance Shipley" <van...@sigscale.com>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality
Dan,
You have to understand if you're selling a residential internet package, it
is NOT dedicated. There has to be some oversubscription allowed for the ISP
to make a profit. If every sub we had used their plan 24/7 and expected the
speed to always be there and not dip down, we wouldn't make
Lucky you!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 12/15/17 09:40, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > Do you not have a DMCA contact? I get these things daily and I
On 12/15/17 09:40, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Do you not have a DMCA contact? I get these things daily and I have a
> pretty small customer count with a geographic that I would suspect is
> minimally using Bittorrent.
>
Not daily, no. Maybe once or twice a month for me.
~Seth
On Dec 15, 2017 23:29, "Dan Thompson" wrote:
How is using what you pay for abuse? In both instances described, the
customer is using a large chunk of their bandwidth, but not using more than
the plan alots.
Fallacy. Imagine your local "all you can eat" buffet
game.
>> Luckily, we can manage this with our Procera now so we don’t hear
>> from customers as much.>> __ __
>> Kris McElroy
>> __ __
>> __ __
>> __ __
>> *From: *<wireless-boun...@wispa.org> on behalf of Mike Hammett
>> <wispawireless@ics
customers as much.
Kris McElroy
From: <wireless-boun...@wispa.org> on behalf of Mike Hammett
<wispawirel...@ics-il.net>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org&g
t;
> *Reply-To: *WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> *Date: *Friday, December 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM
> *To: *WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
>
>
> Fair how?
>
>
>
> -
>
Do you not have a DMCA contact? I get these things daily and I have a
pretty small customer count with a geographic that I would suspect is
minimally using Bittorrent.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:38
On 12/13/17 9:04 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
> I want to be able to throttle torrent users. Beyond that, I don't think it
> will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
I don't really see torrents as a major thing anymore, not like what it
used to be anyway.
5, 2017 at 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
Fair how?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[mage removed by sender.]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[mage remo
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net >
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org >
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality &
-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>
ube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net>
> *To: *"WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
> *Subject: *
erswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net>
> *To: *"WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 201
oun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> DSL compan
On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
> will have little impact on us and
That was part of my "assumption" but every time I make an assumption
I'm hoping to see a resurgence in smaller ISPs as a result of repealing net
neutrality.
On Dec 10, 2017 3:50 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> Net Neutrality never applied to anything other than
Net Neutrality never applied to anything other than mass-market consumer-facing
services.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Chadwick Wachs"
To: wireless@wispa.org
etc. etc. etc. Pay for what
you use, not what your neighbor uses.
marlon
From: Joe Fiero
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 10:15 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
I don’t comment all that often here, but very much pay attention to the voices
Or the beginning of new law suits
On Jul 31, 2014 10:38 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Or the beginning of new business opportunities for smaller companies.
On 7/31/14, 11:07 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
Or the beginning of new law suits
On Jul 31, 2014 10:38 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Oh it's great for business. Terrible for free speech.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
wrote:
Or the beginning of new business opportunities for smaller
I don’t comment all that often here, but very much pay attention to the voices
of experience. On Net Neutrality, I have plenty to say. As with most of my
FCC comments, what I filed 2 weeks ago with them went against the grain. I am
a purist who has been in telecom since I repaired my first
I don’t see it as a beginning to an end, it’s an enhanced option for a low cost
data plan. Ala Carte if you will, the consumer may just do a bulk of their data
use on something like Facebook and minimally for other uses. Why pay for a
whopping big data plan when you may not need it. Get a
That's a great marketing idea, but I bet some douche is going to ruin it...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday,
: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
Oh it's great for business. Terrible for free speech.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
wrote
-
From: Joe Fiero joe1...@optonline.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:15:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
I don’t comment all that often here, but very much pay attention to the voices
of experience. On Net
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 1:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
You don't need NetFlix to pay you for a fast lane... just meet them in their
dozen or so
fees.
Just saying……
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
You don't need NetFlix to pay you for a fast lane
: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:40:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
I don’t believe that to be most everyone’s gripe. Internet and transport are
cheap in comparison to backhaul and the labor required to implement. We have
around 250 links, if you take Netflix out
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:45:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning of the end
Do you get the connection to that facility for free? This is just like every
time the bandwidth cost discussion comes up. The prices that people post that
they’re paying
Joe, I may or may not totally agree with you... but damn I hope you post a
little more often. Thanks for the insight from your experience.
I agree the market place is where this issue will be resolved, not us, not
the government. If the top 2 streaming companies end up with 90% of the
business in
On 07/31/2014 11:15 AM, Joe Fiero wrote:
Netflix,
Hulu, and the like have created a business model where they have
no cost to deliver a product to their users. They are using the
infrastructure built and paid for by others, then stirring up
the
I don't, no.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Tim Densmore tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 9:31:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality, The beginning
Not this WISP...
-Mike
On Thursday, July 31, 2014, Tim Densmore tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com
wrote:
On 07/31/2014 11:15 AM, Joe Fiero wrote:
Netflix, Hulu, and the like have created a business model where they have
no cost to deliver a product to their users. They are using the
And that was an extremely painful thread on NANOG, BTW
On Thursday, July 31, 2014, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Not this WISP...
-Mike
On Thursday, July 31, 2014, Tim Densmore tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com'); wrote:
Absolutely - I didn't mean to rekindle it here. I'm just surprised
when I see that kind of viewpoint, and I'm I'm trying to understand
it a little better, hopefully with a lot less saber rattling than in
that thread. I currently agree with most of the posters in the
useful (mountains,
forest).
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: John Scrivner
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 7:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Glad to hear
++
--
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 2:54 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
At the end of the day it boils down to whether its justified for a WISP to
risk going to court.
Admittedly, any government industry
Nice job! You said most of our talking points on this, I only wish all
Congress would remember where they come from and give their WISP a call,
maybe more members could do what you did and initiate the call to get
the dialogue started. While USF is outside of Congress the FCC sure
listens to
Glad to hear someone up there in DC is listening. Did you happen to mention
anything about our need of access to TVWS?
Scriv
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:56 PM, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
Monday morning I got a phone call from a 202 number and answered it. The
name sounded vaguely
:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Hi there,
Unfortunately I would love to agree with Matt and the fact that I paid for
the network so I should be able to do what I want with it, however, the way
it is currently written, if you provide internet service (which I believe we
all do) you
internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:19 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:55 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
The fact that the DC Circuit (their motto: We hate the FCC) got the case
raises the odds even more.
LOL...have I mentioned how much I enjoy having you back on lists Fred?
Regards,
Jeff
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:19, Tony Iacopi t...@razzolink.com wrote:
Unfortunately I would love to agree with Matt and the fact that I paid for
the network so I should be able to do what I want with it, however, the way
it is currently written, if you provide internet service (which I believe
, 2011 10:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:19, Tony Iacopi t...@razzolink.com wrote:
Unfortunately I would love to agree with Matt and the fact that I paid for
the network so I should be able to do what I want with it, however, the way
, October 28, 2011 10:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:19, Tony Iacopi t...@razzolink.com wrote:
Unfortunately I would love to agree with Matt and the fact that I paid for
the network so I should be able to do what I want with it, however
I am working with two law firms which I hope to announce today, that will be
marketing Open Internet (Net Neutrality) Disclosure Compliance Statements
templates or assistance at a relatively low cost. They are doing this for
WISPA members. All ISP’s must be in compliance and have statements
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I am working with two law firms which I hope to announce today, that will
be
marketing Open Internet (Net Neutrality
-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I am working with two law firms which I hope to announce today, that will
be
marketing Open Internet (Net Neutrality) Disclosure Compliance
Statements
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
At 10/25/2011 07:43 PM, Matt Larsen wrote:
If you are a Title II regulated telco, they might apply to you.
As an operator
If you are a Title II regulated telco, they might apply to you.
As an operator of a privately funded broadband network, Net Neutrality
does not apply to you. You paid for it, you can do what you want with it.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 10/25/2011 4:46 PM, Tony Iacopi wrote:
Hi there,
At 10/25/2011 07:43 PM, Matt Larsen wrote:
If you are a Title II regulated telco, they might apply to you.
As an operator of a privately funded broadband network, Net
Neutrality does not apply to you. You paid for it, you can do what
you want with it.
Legally, per the letter of the
? Is there one?
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
*From:* Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org
*Sent:* Saturday, March 05, 2011 7:49 AM
*To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] net
I cant speak for WISPA's official opinon but
I am still very much against NetNeutrality, as all it really is is an excuse
for more regulation and less competion, and protection for content providers,
and more liablilty for Access providers. And quite honestly, I am still
appauled that the
And now is the time to jump back in on the fight because the republicans have
gained a lot of headway towards reversing the FCC's actions.
And they are likely going to win, with the support of the industry behind them.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
Mark,
Why don't you join WISPA and be part of the process instead of taking pot
shots from the hinterlands. It is time you stepped up to be counted.
For the record, I am personally totally against Network Neutrality; at
least the versions that have been presented thus far. Forcing
++
From: Rick Harnish
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 7:49 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net neutrality... Two articles...
Mark,
Why don't you join WISPA and be part of the process instead of taking pot shots
from the hinterlands. It is time you stepped up to be counted
: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from Genakowski
At 9/2/2010 05:59 PM, you wrote:
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
By permitting specialized services (anything other than a bog-neutral wide
open Internet service) only under limited conditions. Among them
.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.comFred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7:43 PM
To: mailto:wireless@wispa.orgWISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from
At 9/2/2010 03:20 PM, MDK wrote:
Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
basically said We need more public comment.
Yes, we'll need to send in more posts to keep them from producing
rules that put WISPs and other competitive ISPs out of business. It
looks as if
02, 2010 1:21 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from Genakowski
At 9/2/2010 03:20 PM, MDK wrote:
Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
basically said We need more public comment.
Yes, we'll need to send
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
Note how the proposed rules essentially outlaw the competitive
provision of non-POTS telecommunications service (anything but plain
Internet access). They suggest that a large ISP is allowed to offer
some small percentage of their network
At 9/2/2010 05:59 PM, you wrote:
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
By permitting specialized services (anything other than a
bog-neutral wide open Internet service) only under limited
conditions. Among them are these proposals, from the new Further Inquiry:
(E) Limit
.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net neutrality, there may be hope yet...
Why would customers installing file servers cause you a problem if you
limited their throughput
, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net neutrality, there may be hope yet...
Fred,
Many WISPs throttle throughput according to the terms of the contracted
service that each customer purchases. For example, if a WISP sells 1 Mb down
and 512k up then they limit throughput to somewhere near
Our TOS states if they want to run servers then they need a dedicated line.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net neutrality, there may
Competition is what keeps your upstream from doing that. Even if you
have T-1 service in BFE, you can get a T-1 from any major IXC anywhere
T-1s are available.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/3/2010 11:09 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Comments
thinking they are going to be everyone's savior.
Brian
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net neutrality, there may be hope yet...
Comments inline
that at some point the government needs to stop
thinking they are going to be everyone's savior.
Brian
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net
That's what I don't understand... some people are so for Net
Neutrality, but every unhappy incumbent customer is a potential sale.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/3/2010 12:34 PM, MDK wrote:
On the political side of the issue, the
That whole slippery slope thing. Its easy to forget that once they
(They are them. They are they. That are the Men in Black) it will
not be simple or easy. Once telcos really start losing to WISPs you
will see them fight all the harder. There are some good telcos out
there (IIRC some one on the
At 8/3/2010 04:58 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
That's what I don't understand... some people are so for Net
Neutrality, but every unhappy incumbent customer is a potential sale.
I've long opposed network neutrality rules on grounds that it could
put most WISPs out of business. You'd be forced to
Why would customers installing file servers cause you a problem if you
limited their throughput to the Terms and Conditions of their contract
where you would specify the amount of bandwidth that you were supplying
them and limiting them to?
Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 8/3/2010 04:58 PM, Mike
: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] net neutrality, there may be hope yet...
Why would customers installing file servers cause you a problem if you limited
their throughput to the Terms and Conditions of their contract where you would
specify the amount
At 8/3/2010 06:24 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Why would customers installing file servers cause you a problem if
you limited their throughput to the Terms and Conditions of their
contract where you would specify the amount of bandwidth that you
were supplying them and limiting them to?
You could
Fred,
Many WISPs throttle throughput according to the terms of the contracted
service that each customer purchases. For example, if a WISP sells 1 Mb
down and 512k up then they limit throughput to somewhere near those
levels. Under those conditions, a customer can have a file or web
server
At 8/3/2010 09:03 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Fred,
Many WISPs throttle throughput according to the terms of the
contracted service that each customer purchases. For example, if a
WISP sells 1 Mb down and 512k up then they limit throughput to
somewhere near those levels. Under those conditions, a
Comments inline.
Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 8/3/2010 09:03 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Fred,
Many WISPs throttle throughput according to the terms of the
contracted service that each customer purchases. For example, if a
WISP sells 1 Mb down and 512k up then they limit throughput to
Do not feed the troll (repeat)
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/net-neutrality-plan-would-permit-blocking-bittorrent
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/01/28/1431214/FCCs-Net-Neutrality-Plan-Blocks-BitTorrent
--
, September 25, 2009 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.comwrote:
Tell that to espn.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Clint Ricker cric...@kentnis.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Hammett
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I've looked into doing traditional TV over IP and wireless networks... You
can't obtain a license for traditional TV over wireless networks.
I wouldn't mind coming up with a half assed list
-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I've looked into doing traditional TV over IP and wireless networks
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Try talking to DirectTV or Dish Networks. They'll deal with you to resell.
--C
Robert West wrote:
Would the Free To Air stuff work at all? I have some customers who do
Free
To Air but I have yet to even look at one of their setups
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Curtis Maurand
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Try talking to DirectTV or Dish Networks. They'll deal with you to resell.
--C
Robert West wrote:
Would the Free To Air stuff work at all? I
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I know they have business partners that handle the MDU / planned
community sort of things, and they definitely have the equipment to make
it work.
However, if you want to transmit television over
: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:02 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Would the Free To Air stuff work at all? I have some customers who do
Free
To Air but I have yet to even look at one of their setups
: Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:44 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Try talking to DirectTV or Dish Networks. They'll deal with you to
resell.
--C
Robert West wrote:
Would the Free To Air stuff work at all
in the eyes of
the FCC?
Just wondering.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jp
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I know they have business partners
Tell that to espn.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Clint Ricker cric...@kentnis.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Tom,
Your hypothetical about Comcast, etc... creating private networks
--
From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:42 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
I know they have business partners that handle the MDU / planned
community sort of things, and they definitely have
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:49 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
How does DirectTV and the like get out of that red tape mess then? Do
they
pay franchise fees? Or is beaming from space a bit different in the eyes
of
the FCC?
Just
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith d...@mvn.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
Curtis Maurand wrote:
I think they're saying things like Time-Warner can't
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo