inexpensive I believe.
George
Paul Hendry wrote:
Ola,
I’m looking at deploying a small WDS mesh using only
Mikrotik in the mini-box enclosures. I want it to be 5.8GHz only to
avoid future interference but I can only find cheap outdoor omni’s with
N-Type at 2.4GHz. I have run
Ola,
I currently have a scenario
where a dozen clients are connected to a 5.8GHz AP where one is a NLOS link.
The link quality is fine for this client during normal conditions but when it
rains it becomes a little unstable which the customer is fine with as they have
no alternative.
looking at the same TX statistics. Not all equipment
provides this information.
Dave
989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net
129 Ashman St, Midland, MI 48640
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless
Ola,
Im
looking at deploying a small WDS mesh using only Mikrotik in the mini-box
enclosures. I want it to be 5.8GHz only to avoid future interference but I can
only find cheap outdoor omnis with N-Type at 2.4GHz. I have run a couple
of 5.8GHz antennae temporarily at 2.4GHz before
but going ahead and driving
anyway because the car still goes. In short, you are going to be
penalizing yourself significantly. Why not be good to yourself and get
some 5.8 GHz antennas?
jack
Paul Hendry wrote:
Ola,
I’m looking at deploying a small WDS mesh
Ola,
We are
looking for VoIP providers who offer PSTN termination in various countries so
we can make the best use of LCR. The only problem I have come across so far is
that not all providers will pass the CLI that we generate. Does anyone have a
list of VoIP providers who do PSTN
Ola,
Just received a RIC/522 from Mikrotik for testing. Is a bit on the
large size but seems pretty well built/designed. Ideally I would like a
lower powered CPE so that the physical size is much smaller but for business
installs I think these should be fine.
The Rootenna's are
? Is it the norm to get
some form of converter?
Paul Hendry
Skyline Networks
http://www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: 10 May 2006 00:32
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Spectrum Analyzer
I have a HP 8569A
Have you considered the EMP-8602 instead? Cheaper, newer chipset and
supports a, b and g (100mW, 400mW and 400mW). Not used them myself but have
heard good things from people who have.
Paul Hendry
Skyline Networks
http://www.skyline-networks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
You could always go for one of the newer
Nokia cell phones that apart from being a normal cell phone, also support
802.11b/g and VoIP. They also run symbian so you could stick putty on it and remotely
support your network.
Cheers,
P.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Supports EGSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900, WCDMA
(3GPP Rel4), EGPRS, GPRS and 802.11g/e/i. What option do you have in SW
Wisconsin?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Sent: 01 May 2006 12:10
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: 19 April 2006 05:18
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] The Mikrotik Advertisement Feature
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Paul Hendry wrote:
I'll see what I can do but it's only in the lab at present. I'm not
sure a public address would be any help as it relies on all
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Mikrotik Advertisement Feature
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject: [WISPA] The Mikrotik Advertisement Feature
I have recently been playing
this feature looks like in action? I
would really like to see the ad feature running and I am having trouble
visualizing exactly what it is doing.
Many thanks,
Scriv
Paul Hendry wrote:
Aha, now I see it. Never use Winbox so missed the option but now see it on
the CLI too. Are there issues
Advertisement Feature
If the ad is blocked by a pop-up blocker the user sees an empty page with a
link to the ad and has to click on the link before he can continue on to the
the requested page.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless
I have recently been playing with the Hotspot side of Mikrotik which seems
to work well. I had a look through the manual which suggests you should be
able to re-direct people every now and again to advertisements but it
doesn't actually explain how this is done. It looks to be done through the
All the details are on the Valemount web site
http://www.staros.com/starvx/
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Goodin
Sent: 11 April 2006 09:15
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
: Rick Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 04:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation
I can't see how having a QOS switch could hurt...with VOIP, QOS in as
many places
as possible can only help...
Paul Hendry wrote:
Is the switch likely
Ola,
Has anyone tried running Mikrotik on a Via CoreFussion based SBC
yet? I know people have had issues with Via boards in the past but I was
hoping all the bugs are ironed out now. There is one board that I'm thinking
of trying which has the Luke 533MHz, 256M onboard memory, CF slot,
VoIP is an essential part of your offerings. We target business customers
and try to sell SDSL style services instead of ADSL style as it's just as
easy for us to deliver a symmetrical service then it is to deliver an
asymmetric service. The key to selling the symmetric service is by showing
the
Has anyone used radio to radio with
attenuators to check pigtails?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenco Wireless
Sent: 03 March 2006 06:01
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pigtails.
and 5.8GHz low power
It's called the
Is this all just omni's (i.e signal is bouncing of the structure straight
back at the omni causing noise) and what's the preferred for 5.8GHz? Don't
use omni's myself but it always handy to know just in case ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
I notice this kit is 11b only. Is there a specific reason for using 11b for
hotspots instead of 11g? I'm guessing it's because of the greater output
power and receive sensitivity of 11b but isn't OFDM better for bouncing
around the walls of a Hotel?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
You could also try just pinging the broadcast address for the network. Most
network device will respond and show there IP address. Failing that Super
Scan is a great tool and is handy to see what ports you have open and
therefore help asses any security risks.
Cheers,
P.
-Original
Has anyone found another solution like a pc104+ board? There are a few
newer/faster AMD CPU's than the 266MHz Geode in the WRAP board so I'd be
surprised if there isn't a faster/stable generic x86 solution out there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
If it help, we got SR5s as soon as they
where available. When I put them in a real world environment on a StarOS/WRAP
set-up I saw no increase in signal quality on either end. Put the CM9s back in
and still no change.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
What sort of solar panels are needed to run
that little lot?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: 03 February 2006 20:14
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] non-grid
power
We use Wind and Solar power to provide juice for 2
I haven't used Mikrotik on anything other than a WRAP. Has anyone had great
success with Mikrotik in a high speed x86 platform mounted outside at all?
Just been testing 2.9.11 running on P4's with dual-polarized antennas and
was able to get 150mbps half-duplex and 78mbps full-duplex. Obviously
Anyone used the 5GHz RF-Linx amps?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: 30 January 2006 22:36
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF Linx amps vs. YDI amps
I think this is one of those weird things
I have a stack
Reseller
MikroTik RouterOS Certified
www.inetsouth.com
www.mac-tel.us
www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief)
Rayville, La.
318.728.8600
318.303.4227
318.303.4229
Paul Hendry wrote:
I haven't used Mikrotik on anything other than a WRAP. Has anyone had great
success with Mikrotik in a high
'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] RF Linx amps vs. YDI amps
If your using a tranzeo radio you already are
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
114 S. Walnut St.
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Tuesday
: [WISPA] My Towers Need More CPU - suggestions?
Paul Hendry wrote:
What software are you running on them? There are a couple of options out
there including the WAR boards (once StarOS V3 is released) or I have
heard
of several people having great success with the VIA mini-itx fanless
boards.
Both
Hi all,
As standard 802.11 is a half-duplex technology, does anyone know
exactly where collisions occur? I.e. is it in the air between antennas, on
the feeder inside the antenna, on the jumper/pigtail between the antenna and
the radio, on the radio card itself, or all of the above?
Bob, I hear what you're saying and have been through the figures a few times
and even tried turning the power of the radio cards down to 1dB output
(still unable to run both links simultaneously) but this doesn't explain why
others are able to use the same radio cards with similar antennas with
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:43 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Multiple Radios on Single antenna
Bob, I hear what
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:43 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Multiple Radios on Single antenna
Bob, I hear what you're saying and have been through the figures a few times
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Multiple Radios on Single antenna
Really?? What models? We only use 5.8GHz and when we looked at Canopy in the
past they where expensive and had limited
jumping off a bridge here..
Tell Radiowaves about your issue and see if you can send the feedhorns
back for testing. They come right out and may be a quick test to see
whats up.
-B-
Paul Hendry wrote:
Bob, I hear what you're saying and have been through the figures a few
times
and even
Have they produced a product that can pass 1Gbps full-duplex with a -92
signal in a NLOS environment?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 19:01
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] TRANGO!!
Never used Trango before but is that 10mbps full-duplex using both
polarizations of the antennas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: 18 January 2006 19:33
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] TRANGO!!
I did with
what you are doing wrong. It should work without issue.
You are using 2 seperate WRAP boards...corrrect??
-B-
Paul Hendry wrote:
Bob, are you saying that you are running 2 simultaneous links through 2
separate StarOS powered WRAP/CM9 on a single dual-polarized antenna with no
other hardware
DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Multiple Radios on Single antenna
Bob, are you saying
Hi Tom,
Our tower rentals are all based on wind-loading so a dual-pol
antenna costs the same as a single pol. What are the advantages of using
both polarities for the same signal in a good LOS environment?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Just checked the specs for the RadioWaves antennas that I'm having the
problems with and see that they have 28dB X-Pol. Rejection would this
suggest that the circuitry controlling the 2 feeds are separate? If so, is
there anything else that could be preventing us having 2 separate
simultaneous
is being
caused by one radio card receiving the signal directly from the dish as the
radios are mounted so close to the dish? Any other ideas? I'm really stuck
with this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 17 January 2006 20:09
are
doing this?? I'll try to help.
-B-
Paul Hendry wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed more than 1 radio on a single
antenna with virtually no interference between links? We had
originally planned to run 2 simultaneous links on dual polarized 5GHz
RadioWaves parabolics however
Has anyone successfully installed more
than 1 radio on a single antenna with virtually no interference between links?
We had originally planned to run 2 simultaneous links on dual polarized 5GHz RadioWaves
parabolics however once installed we found that only 1 link could be used at
any one
Running a EoIP tunnel across both the T1 and your link you should be able to
load-balance across both links for incoming and outgoing traffic by bonding
both EoIP interfaces at the customer site and your Mikrotik box. I have done
this in the past but it has been across a couple of wireless links
Just out of interest, has anyone set-up VoIP peering with others in
different countries for cheaper international call termination?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 05 January 2006 21:55
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Ola everybody,
I hope everyone had a great Christmas and New Year and are all ready
for 2006, the year of the WISP :)
When I have setup wireless in an area it has always depended on the
Geographic's of the area as to if we deploy 2.4GHz or 5GHz and I have always
decided that 2.4
What other things can be assigned per virtual SSID? It would be nice if you
could set separate frequencies (or channel bandwidths) but I doubt this is
technically possible.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: 27
Anybody know what the Ofcom rules are in the UK for similar?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Stroh
Sent: 28 December 2005 14:30
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Re: 70/80/90 GHz licensed, 60 GHz license-exempt
In the US, 70,
Anyone have a good rule of thumb for physical separation of dishes? Looking
at installing 3 short masts on a water tower with 2 dishes on each mast. 1
will be horizontal and 1 vertical and both will be 5GHz. Is there a
recommendation on how far the 2 antennas should physically be apart to
minimize
Anyone got a way to offer triple play via wireless yet? I heard of someone
working on a product but no idea if anything has been released yet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: 28 December 2005 14:38
To: WISPA General List
The WAR board is to Valemount what RB511 is to Mikrotik in that you can only
run proprietary software on the hardware but the pro's of this are that the
software can get better performance than if using generic x86 platform. Ony
thing is that the performance increase with the RB511 over a WRAP
I get about 25 meg aggregate through StarOS on WRAP boards and have seen at
least double this on a 2 port WAR board running StarVX. Testing was done
using 2 Mikrotik routers at each end with random UDP traffic.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hey Dustin, could you elaborate on the navini sucks statement? We where
looking at deploying them so would be good to know why they are not good.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of dustin jurman
Sent: 15 December 2005 18:48
To: [EMAIL
Hi guys,
Looking
at getting a couple of Spectras but was wondering if someone could
enlighten me a little. The Spectra can supposedly achieve 300mb aggregate
throughput. Do Orthogon achieve this by using compression? If so, what sort of
rate are you likely to get in ideal conditions
So thats 297.63Mbps regardless of
the type of traffic? The thing I wasnt sure about was exactly what the
difference between Spectra and Lite where. Is it purely that the lite can only
achieve 150Mbps? If for example you can only achieve 100Mbps with the Spectra
would you also get 100Mbps
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Orthogon
Spectra
No the Lite will always be half of the full
version.If the Spectra will do 132M then the lite will only do 66M.
Same with the Gemini and the Gemini Lite
Jory Privett
WCCS
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hendry
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Orthogon Spectra
There is no compression used. I can't imagine they half the throughput
for the lite version, but I don't know. I would expect the unit is
simply capped.
-Matt
Paul Hendry wrote:
So is it that the lite won’t do 256QAM or just the software says
Just been doing a bit of work on the Atheros based Netgear WPN824. It's
implementation of MIMO seems to work very well and I was wondering if anyone
has started production on a NLOS outdoor AP based on MIMO yet. I wouldn't
have thought it would be too difficult to attach some pigtails to the
900MHz, 2.4GHz or 5GHz?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Wallace
Sent: 04 December 2005 22:55
To: WISP; Wispa; WISPA; Wispers
Subject: [WISPA] the best 120* Sector
To All,
What is the best 120* sector antenna, F-B ratio -25-30dB, I
So does anyone use any packet aggregation software to help keep a good
throughput across there wireless network?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 14 November 2005 23:06
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Packet
What's wrong with his foot wear? I have a pair my self ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: 26 November 2005 18:08
To: WISPA General List; Jim Patient; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Jim Patient - hehehe
I just ran
Hi Dan,
Was the outlook plugin the only reason you went for Tiger over
Sugar? When we set ours up I compared the 2 and Suger looked more
customizable and also looked like it might integrate with Asterisk sooner
than Tiger.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow, you all replace a lot of kit. What are the main reasons for the CPE's
dying? Isn't there something you can do to improve the install of the units
to help prevent these failures?
We have only been offering services for a year but so far haven't had to
replace a single CPE. We build the CPE's
I use to do this but kept falling of the ladder as the same string was
attached to both my finger and toe ;)
Grab a spare PC and build a standard FreeBSD box then stick SugarCRM on it
(it's not that hard to do as I've managed it ;). Once it's set-up you can
admin it from Windows via the HTML
Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than
1500 bytes I have been playing with Mikrotik's M3P to aggregate the smaller
packets together. Throughput wise this seems to work very well and we see a
big improvement on the amount of data we can pass over our wireless
experience, the guys at MikroTik are quite responsive to user
requests.
Have you asked them about this?
--
Blair Davis
West Michigan Wireless, ISP
269-686-8648
Paul Hendry wrote:
Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than
1500 bytes I have been playing
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:08 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated
throughput on the Orthogon units
Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List'
Subject
Hey Gino,
Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort
of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking
to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km
with a max EIRP of 33db (as thats what we are stuck with in the UK L) or 28km with good
LOS/Fresnel clearance with max EIRP of 33db?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Sent: 13 November 2005
Hmm, interesting. Is it only for the WRAP
platform? L7 will kill that throughput on a WRAP. I guess all it needs is a
modified version of Madwifi and we have another StarOS/Mikrotik/IkarusOS
platform ;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
For StarOS we use MRTG and Starutil. You should be able to graph anything
that Starutil can provide.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: 03 November 2005 17:33
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise
StarOS isn't great for SNMP but Starutil works really well for various
stuff. We have been using it to graph with MRTG the signal levels for
individual clients and backhaul links as well as throughput.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower
@ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz.
?
Lonnie
On 10/28/05, Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120 vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the
tower
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5GHz interference
Paul Hendry wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m
?? I knew Atheros had a 1900MHz chipset but didn't think they had a 900MHz
product. Do you know where the details are for this chipset?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 22 October 2005 22:25
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
Also just noticed that the TCP test results as well as not taking into
account the TCP acknowledgements it also doesn't include the TCP header and
IP header.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 20 October 2005 13:11
:29
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul,
Was this turbo mode or standard?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM
To: 'WISPA General
Ola,
Does anyone have a recommendation on a good
microwave solution to provide about 100mbps full-duplex over 30km? If so, does
anyone have some 2nd hand kit for sale ;)
Cheers,
P.
This email and any files
transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of
this compares with any testing others have done on other
systems but thought I should post the results.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 11 October 2005 16:09
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP
Tom,
You say that connection tracking is on. I advised you to turn this
of (i.e untick all the boxes in the connection tracking sub menu). To give
an example, we have a 28km link with WRAP's/CM9's/5.8GHz at each end. Signal
sits at around -71 (qual 24) and we hard set the rate on both end
Ola,
In the process of re-designing
the corporate website and was wondering if anyone had any wifi related photos
(towers, building with kit on, people using laptops in the middle of a field,
engineer on a tower, etc.) they had taken that they would mind us using.
Many thanks,
P.
Or with StarOS you need to run a VDS tunnel over your wireless link then
bridge the Ethernet to the VDS interface.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 29 September 2005 03:31
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA]
We have a few 2 Radiowaves dishes.
They work great but are a little expensive. Tessco.com have them ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Reed
Sent: 14 September 2005 19:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3' and larger
5.8Ghz dishes
If you get a dry pair from your office to a customer site via the local
exchange is there any reason you couldn't use ADSL2+ or VDSL equipment on a
dry pair?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: 17 August
101 - 190 of 190 matches
Mail list logo