Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

skimmer. 73, Reino OH3mA > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brown via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: tiistai 5. syyskuuta 2023 3.57 > To: WSJT software development > Cc: Jim Brown > Subject: [wsjt-devel] Split > > Team,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

transmission frequency (red mark) is selected outside (not only upper side) the reception frequency (green mark). The waterfall is a bandscope and decoder is a build-in FT8 skimmer. 73, Reino OH3mA > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brown via wsjt-dev

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

n FT8 skimmer. 73, Reino OH3mA > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brown via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: tiistai 5. syyskuuta 2023 3.57 > To: WSJT software development > Cc: Jim Brown > Subject: [wsjt-devel] Split > > Team, > &

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

reception > frequency (green mark). The waterfall is a bandscope and decoder is a > build-in FT8 skimmer. > > 73, Reino OH3mA > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Jim Brown via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > > Sent: tiistai 5. syysk

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

mark). The waterfall is a bandscope and decoder is a build-in FT8 skimmer. 73, Reino OH3mA > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brown via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: tiistai 5. syyskuuta 2023 3.57 > To: WSJT software development > Cc: Jim Brown >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

I disagree with the progam/documentation change request. Split is the radio function invoked for 'rig split', and it is documented well online, how the system uses rig split to control the audio frequency best use window. I feel; 'TX Shift' would cause more confusion, as it still does not

[wsjt-devel] Split

Team, I've several times observed in the more public forum that "split" was a VERY bad word choice to describe the TX shift devised to prevent transmission of audio harmonic distortion. The practice is great, the word choice is terrible, because it is in conflict with what has been standard

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split code into two projects?

Greetings; if you've compiled the current software, you'll probably note that doing so generates quite a few separate applications. Two of these applications are wsjtx and jt9 -- wsjtx *is* the UI on top of the jt9 application. -Brian N9ADG On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:56 AM Daniel Uppström via

[wsjt-devel] Split code into two projects?

Ok, I try to ask this again due to absence of answers. Would be interesting to hear a comment from the actual developers! Wouldn't it be wise to split the code into two projects? A library for underlying DSP and then a GUI application as a separate project? That would benefit experiments

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

Will this version 4.4 be easily distinguishable from the version 4.4 of hamlib that is included in the latest release of wsjt-x? Or is that a problem that the wsjt-x folks have created? #WeDemandRigidlyDefinedAreasOfDoubtAndUncertainty  73, Willie N1JBJ > > On Dec 2, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Black

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

Dave, Please contact me off-listmdblac...@yahoo.com Mike W9DMB On Wednesday, December 1, 2021, 11:25:58 PM CST, Dave J Barnes via wsjt-devel wrote: So a new version of wsjtx is coming in a few days?  On 12/1/21 10:49 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: You

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

No. There is no scheduled date for the next release. Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, December 1, 2021, 11:25:58 PM CST, Dave J Barnes via wsjt-devel wrote: So a new version of wsjtx is coming in a few days?  On 12/1/21 10:49 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: You

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

So a new version of wsjtx is coming in a few days? On 12/1/21 10:49 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: You should be able to build it yourself from the tar.gz file. Just be sure to remove the hamlib package you already have installed as it installs in /usr/local Or you can configure

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

You should be able to build it yourself from the tar.gz file. Just be sure to remove the hamlib package you already have installed as it installs in /usr/local Or you can configure it this way ./configure --prefix=/usr Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, December 1, 2021, 10:24:03 PM CST, Dave J

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

Any help for Linux users? On 12/1/21 10:16 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Please try the latest dll. This version is due to be 4.4 to be released in the next few days. New hamlib for Windows installation directions #1 Shut down WSJTX #2 Download either the 32-bit or 64-bit DLL --

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

Please try the latest dll.This version is due to be 4.4 to be released in the next few days. New hamlib for Windows installation directions#1 Shut down WSJTX#2 Download either the 32-bit or 64-bit DLL -- hopefully your browser doesn't block it but may warn you multiple times.If you can do a

[wsjt-devel] Split, K3 and TS-450 Rig Control

I looked through the archives but I don't see any resolution to the rig control issues with using split on the TS-450.  Split is broken on the K3 too.  The only setting that works is "fake it". Using "rig" for split on the K3 will try to adjust the tx frequency to keep the tones in the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 18/10/2021 18:39, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: /OT All is working fine now with wsjtx and klog, however I am puzzled as to why automatic logging is "(contest only)"? It would be excellent (with klog) if that worked without the reminder dialogue, as klog can be used to tweak qso

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 18/10/2021 14:42, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Bill, It seems we are all as confused as each other although your suggestion would work. Mike just suggested: [baz@localhost ~]# rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -t 4532 --set-conf=serial_handshake=None

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

I updated the man page. This was changed to maintain combability with older versions. So the new way is the correct way. Mike W9MDB On Monday, October 18, 2021, 11:30:45 AM CDT, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote: There is something to do with man pages. For example: [saku@hamtpad ~]$

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

There is something to do with man pages. For example: [saku@hamtpad ~]$ rigctld --version rigctl Hamlib 4.4~git ke loka 13 21:02:40 2021 + SHA=16a879 -    chk_vfo   Returns “CHKVFO 1\n” (single line only) if  rigctld was  invoked

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 18/10/2021 14:29, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 18/10/2021 14:21, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Try this rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -t 4532 --serial_handshake=None --write_delay=5 Hi Mike, Going back to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 18/10/2021 14:21, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Try this rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -t 4532 --serial_handshake=None --write_delay=5 Hi Mike, Going back to this command of yours with syntax that does not work, is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Try this rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -t 4532 --serial_handshake=None --write_delay=5 Hi Mike, Going back to this command of yours with syntax that does not work, is there a current up-to-date ridctld documentation somewhere.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

Got it...thanks Bill. Mike W9MDB On Friday, October 15, 2021, 01:13:21 PM CDT, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 19:05, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 18:37, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: What's the title of that manual?  I'd hope it

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 19:09, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Barry, I have already sent Mike a copy of that document. Great - thanks for letting me know :) Have a good evening! Cheers, Barry G4MKT ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 19:05, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 18:37, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: What's the title of that manual?  I'd hope it would be available on-line. Do you have a scanner on your printer? Also...are you able to checkout the master repo and test the fix

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 18:37, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: What's the title of that manual?  I'd hope it would be available on-line. Do you have a scanner on your printer? Also...are you able to checkout the master repo and test the fix I just posted? Mike W9MDB It's called: "TS-450S

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

What's the title of that manual?  I'd hope it would be available on-line. Do you have a scanner on your printer? Also...are you able to checkout the master repo and test the fix I just posted? Mike W9MDB On Friday, October 15, 2021, 12:29:17 PM CDT, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 18:25, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: I do have the paper one. Maybe the bits you need are not too big? TS-450S that is. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 18:25, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 17:46, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: I'll have a fix for this shortlyI put in a split check for Elecraft rigs and that is doing the "FT" query which isn't supported as Bill notes. Bill...do you know of a CAT

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 17:46, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: I'll have a fix for this shortlyI put in a split check for Elecraft rigs and that is doing the "FT" query which isn't supported as Bill notes. Bill...do you know of a CAT manual for the TS590/690?  I can't seem to find one. Mike

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 17:46, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: I'll have a fix for this shortlyI put in a split check for Elecraft rigs and that is doing the "FT" query which isn't supported as Bill notes. Bill...do you know of a CAT manual for the TS590/690?  I can't seem to find one. Mike

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

I turned it into a generic "don't set unless necessary".  Was causing power problems on the K4 too.Hopefully it's fixed now and applies to all rigs that can get split status and trying to set split on again.  Split off will always run a command. Mike W9MDB On Friday, October 15, 2021,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: 15. lokakuutata 2021 19:47 To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Black Michael Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)   I'll have a fix for this shortlyI put in a split check

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine) I'll have a fix for this shortlyI put in a split check for Elecraft rigs and that is doing the "FT" query which isn't supported as Bill notes. Bill...do you know of a CAT manual for the TS5

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

I'll have a fix for this shortlyI put in a split check for Elecraft rigs and that is doing the "FT" query which isn't supported as Bill notes. Bill...do you know of a CAT manual for the TS590/690?  I can't seem to find one. Mike W9MDB  On Friday, October 15, 2021, 11:30:50 AM CDT,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 17:21, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 15:57, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: the TS-450S and TS-690S use RTS/CTS hardware handshake flow control. I have never see a rig with a serial CAT interface that uses XON/XOFF flow control, RTS/CTS is ubiquitous

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 17:19, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:57, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Since you're not getting any answer with hardware flow it sounds like you have a 3-wire RS232 cable.  So how are your cable pinouts

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 15:57, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: the TS-450S and TS-690S use RTS/CTS hardware handshake flow control. I have never see a rig with a serial CAT interface that uses XON/XOFF flow control, RTS/CTS is ubiquitous on Kenwood rigs with the exception of some handhelds that

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 16:57, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Since you're not getting any answer with hardware flow it sounds like you have a 3-wire RS232 cable.  So how are your cable pinouts connected? Try this rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

Actually a few rigs with xon/xoff including the old Kenwood THD74 according to our defaults.     .serial_handshake =  RIG_HANDSHAKE_XONXOFF,./kenwood/thd74.c     .serial_handshake =  RIG_HANDSHAKE_XONXOFF,./aor/ar8200.c     .serial_handshake =  RIG_HANDSHAKE_XONXOFF,./aor/sr2200.c    

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

Since you're not getting any answer with hardware flow it sounds like you have a 3-wire RS232 cable.  So how are your cable pinouts connected? Try this rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -t 4532 --serial_handshake=None --write_delay=5 See if that write_delay helps in your

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 15:43, Black Michael wrote: Now please test 4.4 without the stopbits and serial_handshake options (let rigctld use the defaults). The difference is the commands are now being stacked and it's possible the lack of hardware flow control is causing this problem.Just let those two

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 15:49, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 15:02, Black Michael wrote: I noticed you have serial_handshake=XONXOFF and stopbits=1 Just let those two items default to stopbits=2 and serial_handshake=Hardware which what I show is the setup for the TS-450. And you

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 15/10/2021 15:02, Black Michael wrote: I noticed you have serial_handshake=XONXOFF and stopbits=1 Just let those two items default to stopbits=2 and serial_handshake=Hardware which what I show is the setup for the TS-450. And you should be able to just check all the Default labels in

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

I noticed you have serial_handshake=XONXOFF and stopbits=1 Just let those two items default to stopbits=2 and serial_handshake=Hardware which what I show is the setup for the TS-450. And you should be able to just check all the Default labels in WJST-X's rig control tab too (which, by the way,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

On 14/10/2021 20:50, Black Michael wrote: That should be fixed in the master branch now. Can you please try that? Hi Mike, Thanks for your quick reply. I rebuilt hamlib package from git master (da34930) and rebuilt a new wsjtx-2.5 package against it. (Not sure if that was strictly

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

That should be fixed in the master branch now.Can you please try that? Mike W9MDB On Thursday, October 14, 2021, 02:36:33 PM CDT, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: There seems to be a regression in hamlib-4.3.x which I have been testing for our dev branch. I maintain the wsjtx

[wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

There seems to be a regression in hamlib-4.3.x which I have been testing for our dev branch. I maintain the wsjtx package for Mageia (Linux) and do all my testing with my Kenwood TS-450S. We use the system hamlib. Fake-it works, but any attempt to use RIG for split now fails with the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation in VHF and submode features enabled

Hi Bill, Thank you for prompt reply. I understand your explanation. I am using Q65A mode with 6mb usually, but I want the split operation to be normal. Is there any inconvenience with disabled "VHF and submode features", though Q65 quick start quide recommends it should be active? Current RC

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation in VHF and submode features enabled

On 22/08/2021 15:35, Yukio JG1APX via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi development teams I apologize my report if it is already known issue and discussed before. OS : Windows 10 pro 21H1 Wsjtx : 2.5.0rc5 Rig : IC-9700, FT-991A, FTDX-3000, FTDX-101 Split operations (Rig and Fake It) are not working

[wsjt-devel] Split weirdness with 2.3.0 Oc42df

Hello, To operate 630m on IC-7300 I use an 80m-630m transmit converter, this has worked flawlessly until recently. I'm not sure how to describe this but Ham Lib appears to be recalling from memory a "past split frequency setting" of the radio and now I can't clear it. How do I clear this

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode settings

Hi Om's This is the way I'm doing split operation on 160m for JA. Now doing FT8 with an IC-7300 and it's a bit different from the IC-775 I was using B4. First off all go into wsjt-x settings/radio and mark None in the Split Operation section. Then go to the Frequencies Tab and insert 1,908

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode settings

> On Dec 23, 2019, at 04:43, Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > I have used this way of doing it with FT1000MP, FT1000MP MarkV and FTdx3000 > operating as JW6VDA, and a similar setup also works with my IC7300 from my > home station, OH6VDA. Originally I was put on the right track by

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode settings

Hi Claude! I have used this way of doing it with FT1000MP, FT1000MP MarkV and FTdx3000 operating as JW6VDA, and a similar setup also works with my IC7300 from my home station, OH6VDA. Originally I was put on the right track by Michael 5P1KZS. To operate SPLIT (to work JA) on 160 meters: In

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode settings

On 23/12/2019 10:37, Claude Frantz wrote: Hi all, Please allow me to ask about the split mode in the sense of a necessity resulting from different frequency assignments in different countries, i.e. a sort of special form of multi-band operation. The typical situation is the QSO between a

[wsjt-devel] Split mode settings

Hi all, Please allow me to ask about the split mode in the sense of a necessity resulting from different frequency assignments in different countries, i.e. a sort of special form of multi-band operation. The typical situation is the QSO between a Japanese station and a station in Region 1.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

On 13/12/2018 08:17, Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel wrote: NB! Don't mark the "Split setting" in WSJT-X as RIG or FAKE. Mark as "None" in settings. Hi Tom, I am surprised that works and it is certainly not a good suggestion for all users. I would expect WSJT-X to disable SPLIT on your rig if

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

Bill, I’ve discussed this with Keijo, and this method of working split also worked fine, at least with the FT-1000Mp and FTdx3000. I see no reason why it shouldn’t work on any radio with dual vfos: To operate SPLIT (to work JA) on 160 meters: In WSJT-X set freq. to 1,908 Mhz - will set ur VFO A

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

Greer > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:52 PM > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation > > Just check the keep TX frequency that way when you transmit you will be > transmitting where you set yourself, and the rx will go

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

FB! Thanks Bill! I am not the only one on TOP band, so the info was very welcome! Keijo -Alkuperäinen viesti- From: Bill Somerville Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 8:10 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation On 12/12/2018 17:45, OG55W

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

On 12/12/2018 17:45, OG55W wrote: I have tried to find how to operate with split.. JA-stations are calling me in 1908 as I am transmitting in 1840, and I do not hear them as my RX or TX change the frequency. I am not allowed to transmit in 1908. Hi Keijo, WSJT-X does not support this using

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

Steven! The waterfall is only 3500 Hz wide and it should be more than 68000 Hz wide to hear 1908 kHz. Keijo From: Steven Greer Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:52 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation Just check the keep TX frequency that way

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split operation

Just check the keep TX frequency that way when you transmit you will be transmitting where you set yourself, and the rx will goto the calling station.  Thats how I do it.  Not sure if I'm allowed to comment to the mailing to help others if not just let me know and I won't help out anymore on

[wsjt-devel] Split operation

I have tried to find how to operate with split.. JA-stations are calling me in 1908 as I am transmitting in 1840, and I do not hear them as my RX or TX change the frequency. I am not allowed to transmit in 1908. Somebody said that use the RIT, but with FT-2000 1908 is too far away… 73 Keijo

[wsjt-devel] Split answer to CQ & TX off

Hi! During last week I made one more extension to cqrlog's wsjt-x connection. Friday's ES opening was perfect place to test it with 92 qsos that about 90% of them were made by answering to CQ. As we know wsjt-x stops TX if answer to CQ is done at same frequency as CQ calling and answer does

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split Mode/Fake It

I do the same transmit filter on my ANAN 100 at 1450-2050.Don't see any reason we couldn't do a split adjustment at offset-25 for FT8 and run a 100Hz filter.  That's the minimum filter size PowerSDR will take.So for a 1900 offset you would get split at 1875m, your signal at 1900-1950, and the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split Mode/Fake It

This was not obvious to me from reading the manual or noting that the dial frequency was moved up or down. It is key that the audio frequency is also moved opposite the dial frequency an equal amount and both should be mentioned in the manual - for slow heads like me at least. Anyway, I get it

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split occurring - Non DX Exp Mode

Doh! Understood what it purpose is for  and will leave it enabled. Thanks Bill Mark ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On 8 Apr 2018, 20:01, at 20:01, Bill Somerville wrote: >On 07/04/2018 23:31, Mark Rutherford wrote: >> Morning Guys, >> >> Regarding testing Apr7th 1400-1600 from

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split occurring - Non DX Exp Mode

On 07/04/2018 23:31, Mark Rutherford wrote: Morning Guys, Regarding testing Apr7th 1400-1600 from OZ I was able to some hound activity in the first 30min or so last night but not neither "KH7Z" stations. That said, this morning I've noticed that once I deactivated "hound" mode, so its now

[wsjt-devel] Split occurring - Non DX Exp Mode

Morning Guys, Regarding testing Apr7th 1400-1600 from OZ I was able to some hound activity in the first 30min or so last night but not neither "KH7Z" stations. That said, this morning I've noticed that once I deactivated "hound" mode, so its now in normal FT8 mode and the setting for split was

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8

Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:00:38 -0400 "James Shaver" kirjoitti: > And the “normal” 17 meter frequency as well with the same results… I was on 17m calling too... Twice got report, but never rr73. Saw that happened some others too. Think we all need much more practice, so fox as

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8

And the “normal” 17 meter frequency as well with the same results… From: James Shaver [mailto:n2...@windstream.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 5:59 PM To: 'WSJT software development' Subject: RE: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8 Unfortunately, they’re using the DXPedition mode

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8

: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 4:11 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8 Just worked PJ-5/SP9FIH in the hound mode! Tuned up past 1000 he was on 274 . Now I put my rig on fake it. The program says it advised me it should be in dx exbition mode! So it worked

[wsjt-devel] Split mode ft 8

Just worked PJ-5/SP9FIH in the hound mode! Tuned up past 1000 he was on 274 . Now I put my rig on fake it. The program says it advised me it should be in dx exbition mode! So it worked for me and others no problem. Sent from AOL Mobile

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

Rich -- On 3/15/2018 11:39 AM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: If at all possible, I'd recommend that a 4-digit (160 thru 40M) or 5-digit (30M thru 6M) number in a CQ text message be interpreted as the frequency to set VFO-B. It is harder to misinterpret an exact frequency, especially once the DXpedition

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

If at all possible, I'd recommend that a 4-digit (160 thru 40M) or 5-digit (30M thru 6M) number in a CQ text message be interpreted as the frequency to set VFO-B. It is harder to misinterpret an exact frequency, especially once the DXpedition mode starts being used and DX stations use Rx

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

't yet tried to replicate the problem with another local FT8 user. 73, Rich - K1HTV = = = [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug? Black MichaelTo  WSJT  - Delete - Actions That's almost a QSY request but that format is expecting a 3-digit frequency so would've thought you'd see a 190kHz movement

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

Hi Rich, Apparently H40YM transmitted "CQ 1908 H40YM", indicating that he was hoping to raise JAs in a higher part of the band. That's a free text message, so double-clicking on it will *not* put H40YM into your DX Call box. Of course, you can do this manually, however. Double-clicking on

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

local FT8 user. 73, Rich - K1HTV = = = [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug? Black Michael https://connect.xfinity.com/appsuite/# To WSJT https://connect.xfinity.com/appsuite/# * Delete * Actions https://connect.xfinity.com/appsuite/# That's almost a QSY request but that format is expecting a 3

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

That's almost a QSY request but that format is expecting a 3-digit frequency so would've thought you'd see a 190kHz movement Did you see a QSY message in your Rx window? de Mike W9MDB On Thursday, March 15, 2018, 6:49:15 AM CDT, Rich - K1HTV wrote: This

[wsjt-devel] Split FT8 QSY bug?

This morning, a few minutes before local sunrise, H40YM showed up on 160 Meter FT8 on 1840 KHz calling "CQ 1908 H40YM". He was listening up the band in the 160M Japan operating area frequency window. Wanting to to work the H40 split, I temporarily set the WSJT-X File/Settings/Radio/ "Split

[wsjt-devel] split frequency logging

I am running WSJT-X v1.8.0 with “Hold Tx Freq” checked, and allow Rx frequency to float. So most of my QSO’s have Rx frequencies different from my Tx frequencies. During normal logging operations, the differences are captured, as they should be. Every once in a while I will need to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

Wednesday, November 22, 2017 9:43 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging On 11/22/2017 02:25 PM, Dan Malcolm wrote: Hi Dan & all, > WSJT-X is pretty good at running QSO’s with ‘split’ f

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

d I'll continue manual corrections.  Not a big deal, but was curious. __ Dan – K4SHQ -Original Message- From: Claude Frantz [mailto:claude.fra...@bayern-mail.de] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 9:43 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split fre

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

, November 22, 2017 9:43 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging On 11/22/2017 02:25 PM, Dan Malcolm wrote: Hi Dan & all, > WSJT-X is pretty good at running QSO’s with ‘split’ frequency > operation.  JTAlert is essential for smooth QS

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

On 11/22/2017 02:41 PM, Karl Barth wrote: Hi Charly & all, >  I got a radio licence, not my PC - But my PC has really better ears than myself. Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

On 11/22/2017 02:25 PM, Dan Malcolm wrote: Hi Dan & all, > WSJT-X is pretty good at running QSO’s with ‘split’ frequency > operation.  JTAlert is essential for smooth QSO tracking and logging.  > What I am missing is logging the separate frequencies for a split QSO.  > I suspect that most ops

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

mailto:df5...@darc.de] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:42 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging Dear all, it is not too long ago and we commonly used to run our qso's in person (cw/ssb) and log on paper. Do we realy need to get all radio cont

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

Dear all, it is not too long ago and we commonly used to run our qso's in person (cw/ssb) and log on paper. Do we realy need to get all radio contacts fully automated? Just  go to the shack in the morning and activate the PC with all add-on automated software?  I got a radio licence, not my PC

[wsjt-devel] Split frequency logging

WSJT-X is pretty good at running QSO’s with ‘split’ frequency operation. JTAlert is essential for smooth QSO tracking and logging. What I am missing is logging the separate frequencies for a split QSO. I suspect that most ops don’t track the different Tx and Rx frequencies, but I do.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split Operation

Thanks for the good wishes, Morris! I am gradually feeling better...this was my first "high-dose" flu shot and probably my last! The amount of antigen is four times a standard flu shot. Ed, K0KC k0kc@arrl.nethttp://k0kc.us/ On Friday, September 29, 2017, 2:22:29 PM EDT, Morris Wideman

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split Operation

Gary, I agree that people should notice the red line, but I think they tend to get tuned-in to the right-hand window when looking for a response. I know that I have missed a couple myself. Ed, K0KC k0kc@arrl.nethttp://k0kc.us/ On Friday, September 29, 2017, 2:37:26 PM EDT, Gary McDuffie

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split Operation

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Morris Wideman via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > This is where more and better filters would also be useful when the left > screen is full of calls that have nothing to do with your call or QSO. Hope > you get to feeling better Ed.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split Operation

This is where more and better filters would also be useful when the left screen is full of calls that have nothing to do with your call or QSO. Hope you get to feeling better Ed.73 Morris wa4mit On Friday, September 29, 2017, 11:03:39 AM CDT, Ed Wilson via wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Split Operation

I have been using WSJT-X since its inception and JT65-HF before that. I was always one of those "bad guys" who checked the Tx=Rx box unless I was trying to contact a DX station where dozens of others were probably calling him or her and it made sense to call off-frequency. Over the past couple

[wsjt-devel] Split

If I call CQ OH1MRR UP, double click does not work. Tested this with my friend... But CQ UP OH1MRR works... The other day saw one station callin that way and tried to get him, no lucky with double clicg from BandActivity window. Regards Jarmo, OH1MRR

[wsjt-devel] split mode VFOB update broken on 7187?

When setting up to use split mode, VFOB is no longer updated to VFOA +1KHz. Rather, it is set to VFOA frequency. This is without Monitor returns to last Frequency checked. Is this a design change? With Monitor returns checked, the last frequency used on *any* band is used for transmit out of

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-Mode and Elecraft K3

Not sure if it helps but I use "fake it" with my K3 and it works quite well. Jim S. N2ADV > On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: > >> On 11/07/2016 12:38, Bob KD7YZ wrote: >> If I select Split-Rig in WSJTx; setup K3 to Split; Set DxCommander to >> Split

  1   2   >