Le 7 déc. 08 à 18:47, Nicolas Dorfsman a écrit :
>
> Le 7 déc. 08 à 18:26, Ian Matchett a écrit :
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> However will prstat -Z tell me much in the zone?
>
> Good question.
> I need to check.
Well. A sort of...
prstat will give you SWAP and RSS used by YOUR zone.
prtconf would give
ramanujan oops wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> What's the output of "pkg version" ?
>
>
>
>> Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_86 January 2008
>> # bash
>> bash-3.2# pkg version
>> d974bb176266
>> bash-3.2#
>
>
> I understand tha
Attached is a proposal for native-brand zone p2v that
I am planning to submit for ARC review soon. I'd like
to hear any comments about this.
Thanks,
Jerry
---
SUMMARY:
This fast-track enhances the Solaris Zones [1] subsystem to address an
existing RFE [2] requesting a "physical to vi
Jerry Jelinek writes:
> 1) SMF services that are not usable within a zone should be deleted or
> disabled as necessary (for S8 and S9 we dealt with rc scripts
> instead).
> 2) Network configuration must be adjusted depending on if the zone is
> shared-stack or exclusive.
Le 6 nov. 08 à 20:30, Steve Lawrence a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:20:43AM -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao
(LaoTsao) wrote:
anyone know when the brandz for s10 will be out?
e.g. running s10 with opensolaris zone?
No target has been set for this. We cannot reasonably manage such a
projec
* Nicolas Dorfsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-08 16:46]:
>
> Le 6 nov. 08 à 20:30, Steve Lawrence a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:20:43AM -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> anyone know when the brandz for s10 will be out?
>>> e.g. running s10 with opensolaris zone?
James,
James Carlson wrote:
> Jerry Jelinek writes:
>> 1) SMF services that are not usable within a zone should be deleted or
>> disabled as necessary (for S8 and S9 we dealt with rc scripts
>> instead).
>> 2) Network configuration must be adjusted depending on if the zone is
>>
Tjere are some SMF services known to break when moving into a zone from
a physical server. Things like sysevent, FMA-ish stuff, ldom manager,
etc. (I don't have my notes in front of me, but I seem to remember
around 4-5 from a SUNWall vanilla installation). Mostly stuff tied to
the hardware
Nicolas Dorfsman writes:
> Enterprise version of OpenSolaris ?
>
> Could anybody explain what does it mean ?
It doesn't exist yet, so it's unlikely that a complete answer is
available ... at least until something's announced by Sun.
My guess would be at least an OpenSolaris distribution includin
Bill Walker wrote:
>
> Tjere are some SMF services known to break when moving into a zone from
> a physical server. Things like sysevent, FMA-ish stuff, ldom manager,
> etc. (I don't have my notes in front of me, but I seem to remember
> around 4-5 from a SUNWall vanilla installation). Mostly
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Jerry Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SUMMARY:
>
> This fast-track enhances the Solaris Zones [1] subsystem to address an
> existing RFE [2] requesting a "physical to virtual" (or p2v) capability
> for installing native-branded zones based on an exis
Jerry Jelinek writes:
> > Can a user predict what these automatic changes will be? After
> > import, is there a log of the changes or "adjustments" made?
>
> I assume you really mean which SMF services will be off, since
> the other changes are listed here in the case?
Exactly.
> We can descri
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
>> The image modifications fall into the following areas:
>> 1) SMF services that are not usable within a zone should be deleted or
>>disabled as necessary (for S8 and S9 we dealt with rc scripts
>> instead).
>
> This implies that the source system can be
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:14:26AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
> Yes, not everything that runs in the global zone works in a
> non-global zone. NFS serving or non-global zones are the most obvious
> examples.
>
> For SMF services, the services to be deleted are the the ones
> delivered in SVr4 pk
Nico,
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:14:26AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
>> Yes, not everything that runs in the global zone works in a
>> non-global zone. NFS serving or non-global zones are the most obvious
>> examples.
>>
>> For SMF services, the services to be deleted ar
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:37:48PM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> > I am not planning on making any automated changes to the privileges
> > available
> > to the zone. If this turns out to be an important issue, then we could
> > look at that as a possible future enhancement. The problem I see is
Jerry Jelinek writes:
> Mike Gerdts wrote:
> > This implies that the source system can be S8, S9, or S10. I don't
> > see anywhere else in the proposal that explicitly states that S8 and
> > S9 can be attached and upgraded, so I suspect I am reading my wishes
> > into your words.
>
> That was not
James,
James Carlson wrote:
> Jerry Jelinek writes:
>> Mike Gerdts wrote:
>>> This implies that the source system can be S8, S9, or S10. I don't
>>> see anywhere else in the proposal that explicitly states that S8 and
>>> S9 can be attached and upgraded, so I suspect I am reading my wishes
>>> in
Nicolas Williams writes:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:37:48PM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> > I suppose it'd be possible to look through the SMF 'privileges' for
> > the services that are still enabled, and then attempt to union those
> > into the zone privileges ... but it's unclear if that's real
Jerry Jelinek writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > "Update on attach" just means "apply saved patches, if any are
> > needed," right?
>
> Not really. We see what pkgs are out of sync, either because of the
> pkg version of because of patches applied to those pkgs, then we do
> something similar to
James,
James Carlson wrote:
> Jerry Jelinek writes:
>> James Carlson wrote:
>>> "Update on attach" just means "apply saved patches, if any are
>>> needed," right?
>> Not really. We see what pkgs are out of sync, either because of the
>> pkg version of because of patches applied to those pkgs, the
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think answering that would answer the previous poster's question
> about the difference between doing an upgrade before flar creation and
> just importing a flar from S9: the former results in a native zone
> using this
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think answering that would answer the previous poster's question
>> about the difference between doing an upgrade before flar creation and
>> just importing a flar from S9: the former resul
Jerry Jelinek writes:
> We can handle 'update on attach' from s10 to nv, although nv isn't an
> official release yet and something might happen which breaks this (maybe
> IPS?). We don't support 'update on attach' of s8 or s9, although I have
> played
> around with that and it kind of works. The
James,
James Carlson wrote:
> Jerry Jelinek writes:
>> We can handle 'update on attach' from s10 to nv, although nv isn't an
>> official release yet and something might happen which breaks this (maybe
>> IPS?). We don't support 'update on attach' of s8 or s9, although I have
>> played
>> around
Jerry Jelinek writes:
> > Since we (intentionally?) make branded zones available only for minor
> > releases -- and not for individual KUs -- this means that the user
> > should expect that he's forced into an upgrade of some sort that
> > emulates patching when importing an S10 zone onto an S10 sy
James,
James Carlson wrote:
> Presumably, as a non-native zone, if such a thing existed, it would be
> expected to result in no upgrade-on-attach behavior. Right?
Right, although the behavior is really dictated by the brand
definition, so some sort of behavior could be defined for
zone attachmen
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:30:18PM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> Nicolas Williams writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:37:48PM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> > > I suppose it'd be possible to look through the SMF 'privileges' for
> > > the services that are still enabled, and then attempt to union
James,
Thanks for your answer.
Le 8 déc. 08 à 18:07, James Carlson a écrit :
> (If what you might be expecting here is someone to take the code
> "private" somehow, then I very much doubt that.)
I'm just really surprised to see "OpenSolaris" and "Enterprise" in
the sa
Nicolas Dorfsman writes:
> I'm just really surprised to see "OpenSolaris" and "Enterprise" in
> the same idea.
> I thought...no, I'm sure "Enterprise OpenSolaris" is just called
> "Solaris".
I agree that what you're suggesting would seem simpler and more
obvious (it does to me), bu
Hello,
Sorry if I am missing something obvious but is there a good way either
via the Zone or Global Zone's SNMP to get the current bandwidth usage
for a specific Zone or a command someone can think of that would give
me this information? Currently it appears as though netstat -i in a
31 matches
Mail list logo
