Re: [zones-discuss] Java out of memory error in a zone

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Dorfsman
Le 7 déc. 08 à 18:47, Nicolas Dorfsman a écrit : Le 7 déc. 08 à 18:26, Ian Matchett a écrit : Thanks However will prstat -Z tell me much in the zone? Good question. I need to check. Well. A sort of... prstat will give you SWAP and RSS used by YOUR zone. prtconf would give you memory

Re: [zones-discuss] [pkg-discuss] problem creating zones in opensolaris - IPS brand

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
ramanujan oops wrote: On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: What's the output of pkg version ? Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_86 January 2008 # bash bash-3.2# pkg version d974bb176266 bash-3.2# I understand that this is a pretty old

[zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Attached is a proposal for native-brand zone p2v that I am planning to submit for ARC review soon. I'd like to hear any comments about this. Thanks, Jerry --- SUMMARY: This fast-track enhances the Solaris Zones [1] subsystem to address an existing RFE [2] requesting a physical to

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Jerry Jelinek writes: 1) SMF services that are not usable within a zone should be deleted or disabled as necessary (for S8 and S9 we dealt with rc scripts instead). 2) Network configuration must be adjusted depending on if the zone is shared-stack or exclusive.

Re: [zones-discuss] Update on attach and upgrades

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Dorfsman
Le 6 nov. 08 à 20:30, Steve Lawrence a écrit : On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:20:43AM -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) wrote: anyone know when the brandz for s10 will be out? e.g. running s10 with opensolaris zone? No target has been set for this. We cannot reasonably manage such a

Re: [zones-discuss] Update on attach and upgrades

2008-12-08 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Nicolas Dorfsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-12-08 16:46]: Le 6 nov. 08 à 20:30, Steve Lawrence a écrit : On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:20:43AM -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) wrote: anyone know when the brandz for s10 will be out? e.g. running s10 with opensolaris zone? No target has

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Bill Walker
Tjere are some SMF services known to break when moving into a zone from a physical server. Things like sysevent, FMA-ish stuff, ldom manager, etc. (I don't have my notes in front of me, but I seem to remember around 4-5 from a SUNWall vanilla installation). Mostly stuff tied to the hardware

Re: [zones-discuss] Update on attach and upgrades

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Nicolas Dorfsman writes: Enterprise version of OpenSolaris ? Could anybody explain what does it mean ? It doesn't exist yet, so it's unlikely that a complete answer is available ... at least until something's announced by Sun. My guess would be at least an OpenSolaris distribution including

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Bill Walker wrote: Tjere are some SMF services known to break when moving into a zone from a physical server. Things like sysevent, FMA-ish stuff, ldom manager, etc. (I don't have my notes in front of me, but I seem to remember around 4-5 from a SUNWall vanilla installation). Mostly

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Jerry Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SUMMARY: This fast-track enhances the Solaris Zones [1] subsystem to address an existing RFE [2] requesting a physical to virtual (or p2v) capability for installing native-branded zones based on an existing

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Jerry Jelinek writes: Can a user predict what these automatic changes will be? After import, is there a log of the changes or adjustments made? I assume you really mean which SMF services will be off, since the other changes are listed here in the case? Exactly. We can describe which

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Mike, Mike Gerdts wrote: The image modifications fall into the following areas: 1) SMF services that are not usable within a zone should be deleted or disabled as necessary (for S8 and S9 we dealt with rc scripts instead). This implies that the source system can be S8, S9,

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:14:26AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Yes, not everything that runs in the global zone works in a non-global zone. NFS serving or non-global zones are the most obvious examples. For SMF services, the services to be deleted are the the ones delivered in SVr4 pkgs

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Nico, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:14:26AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Yes, not everything that runs in the global zone works in a non-global zone. NFS serving or non-global zones are the most obvious examples. For SMF services, the services to be deleted are the the

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:37:48PM -0500, James Carlson wrote: I am not planning on making any automated changes to the privileges available to the zone. If this turns out to be an important issue, then we could look at that as a possible future enhancement. The problem I see is that

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Jerry Jelinek writes: Mike Gerdts wrote: This implies that the source system can be S8, S9, or S10. I don't see anywhere else in the proposal that explicitly states that S8 and S9 can be attached and upgraded, so I suspect I am reading my wishes into your words. That was not my

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
James, James Carlson wrote: Jerry Jelinek writes: Mike Gerdts wrote: This implies that the source system can be S8, S9, or S10. I don't see anywhere else in the proposal that explicitly states that S8 and S9 can be attached and upgraded, so I suspect I am reading my wishes into your words.

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Nicolas Williams writes: On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:37:48PM -0500, James Carlson wrote: I suppose it'd be possible to look through the SMF 'privileges' for the services that are still enabled, and then attempt to union those into the zone privileges ... but it's unclear if that's really the

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Jerry Jelinek writes: James Carlson wrote: Update on attach just means apply saved patches, if any are needed, right? Not really. We see what pkgs are out of sync, either because of the pkg version of because of patches applied to those pkgs, then we do something similar to uninstalling

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
James, James Carlson wrote: Jerry Jelinek writes: James Carlson wrote: Update on attach just means apply saved patches, if any are needed, right? Not really. We see what pkgs are out of sync, either because of the pkg version of because of patches applied to those pkgs, then we do

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think answering that would answer the previous poster's question about the difference between doing an upgrade before flar creation and just importing a flar from S9: the former results in a native zone using this new

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Mike, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think answering that would answer the previous poster's question about the difference between doing an upgrade before flar creation and just importing a flar from S9: the former results in a

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Jerry Jelinek writes: We can handle 'update on attach' from s10 to nv, although nv isn't an official release yet and something might happen which breaks this (maybe IPS?). We don't support 'update on attach' of s8 or s9, although I have played around with that and it kind of works. There

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
James, James Carlson wrote: Jerry Jelinek writes: We can handle 'update on attach' from s10 to nv, although nv isn't an official release yet and something might happen which breaks this (maybe IPS?). We don't support 'update on attach' of s8 or s9, although I have played around with that

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Jerry Jelinek writes: Since we (intentionally?) make branded zones available only for minor releases -- and not for individual KUs -- this means that the user should expect that he's forced into an upgrade of some sort that emulates patching when importing an S10 zone onto an S10 system.

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
James, James Carlson wrote: Presumably, as a non-native zone, if such a thing existed, it would be expected to result in no upgrade-on-attach behavior. Right? Right, although the behavior is really dictated by the brand definition, so some sort of behavior could be defined for zone

Re: [zones-discuss] zone p2v proposal

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:30:18PM -0500, James Carlson wrote: Nicolas Williams writes: On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:37:48PM -0500, James Carlson wrote: I suppose it'd be possible to look through the SMF 'privileges' for the services that are still enabled, and then attempt to union those

Re: [zones-discuss] Update on attach and upgrades

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Dorfsman
James, Thanks for your answer. Le 8 déc. 08 à 18:07, James Carlson a écrit : (If what you might be expecting here is someone to take the code private somehow, then I very much doubt that.) I'm just really surprised to see OpenSolaris and Enterprise in the same

Re: [zones-discuss] Update on attach and upgrades

2008-12-08 Thread James Carlson
Nicolas Dorfsman writes: I'm just really surprised to see OpenSolaris and Enterprise in the same idea. I thought...no, I'm sure Enterprise OpenSolaris is just called Solaris. I agree that what you're suggesting would seem simpler and more obvious (it does to me), but it's up

[zones-discuss] Zone Bandwidth

2008-12-08 Thread Jon Ringuette
Hello, Sorry if I am missing something obvious but is there a good way either via the Zone or Global Zone's SNMP to get the current bandwidth usage for a specific Zone or a command someone can think of that would give me this information? Currently it appears as though netstat -i in a