On Wednesday, 13 December 2023 14:30:37 IST Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > In the view of Lifnei iver,
> >
> > Recently RMS had shared an alleged PFLP affiliated organization calls to
> > prevent arms deals to Israel, PFLP participated in the Simhat torah
> > massacre.
> >
RMS (besides being a rather egregious person in general) is, in this case,
neither supporting nor not supporting anyone's enemies.
He's calling to reduce arms sales to a state that engages in wholesale
slaughter of civillians, just like its enemies.
> From: borissh1...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:48:13 +0200
> Message-ID-Hash: W5NHGXQZJVMKFFHYYY5PG4X74ONPMXEH
>
> In the view of Lifnei iver,
>
> Recently RMS had shared an alleged PFLP affiliated organization calls to
> prevent arms deals to Israel, PFLP participated in the
In the view of Lifnei iver,
Recently RMS had shared an alleged PFLP affiliated organization calls to
prevent arms deals to Israel, PFLP participated in the Simhat torah massacre.
https://www.stallman.org/archives/2023-sep-dec.html#9_December_2023_(Legal_challenges_over_arms_exports)
The
2011/6/13 Tom Balazs tom123onl...@gmail.com
It seems that Mr. Snitz is a mathematician, anarchist,...
Let me guess - he's a Chaos theorist? :)
--Amos
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
private person does not mean the FSF in involved. As a private
person Richard Stallman has the right to boycott
2011/6/15 Ira Abramov lists-linux...@ira.abramov.org
Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
private person does not mean the FSF in involved. As a
Are you going to start that discussion again?
Everyone said their opinion and nothing new was added for quite a few emails
now.
Maybe we should just let it die out?
Ely
2011/6/15 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com
2011/6/15 Ira Abramov lists-linux...@ira.abramov.org
Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from
On Jun 15, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Ira Abramov wrote:
you know, there IS a logical falacy of guilt by association.
There may be, but there is a clear case here, RMS as president of the
FSF has, ex officio (from his office, meaning as the president, not
his desk) said that he was boycotting.
I may act differently if the FSF boycotts israel.
Is the FSF not boycotting Israel? I guess it depends on how you see things,
but when Stallman signs on a letter as President of the FSF that he will
not come to Israel unless it is at a venue that sponsors an anti-Israel
boycott, I don't know
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 at 15:56:03 (GMT+2) Ira Abramov Lists-Linux-
i...@ira.abramov.org wrote:
Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
private person does
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 at 16:18:42 (GMT+2) Erez D
erez0...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/15 Ira Abramov lists-linux...@ira.abramov.org
Quoting geoffrey mendelson, from the post of Sun, 12 Jun:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard
I have been reading quite a lot of messages about this topic. I feel (and
this is my feeling only) that it has been talked enough. Mr. Stallman
doesn't want to be here. He doesn't care about the other side of the story,
and he is so much about his own religion, that he forgets that each coin has
Enough already.
The RMS thread-craze is *clearly* against the rules and guide-lines of
Linux-IL mailing list, as it has little to do (if any) with, and I quote
Linux related *questions* and *discussions* (emphasis mine).
ML owner: Time to intervene?
- Gilboa
On Monday 13 June 2011 at 15:53:39 (GMT+2) Gilboa Davara
gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Enough already.
The RMS thread-craze is *clearly* against the rules and guide-lines
of Linux-IL mailing list, as it has little to do (if any) with, and
I quote Linux related *questions* and *discussions*
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Marc Volovic wrote:
People, RMS (as well as any other person) is entitled to support,
adhere, acquiesce or abhor, deny, etc any and all BDS activities.
The man is entitled to his opinion and choice. It is his right as a
man and as a public figure.
Marc, it
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 09:45:33AM +0300, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Marc Volovic wrote:
People, RMS (as well as any other person) is entitled to support,
adhere, acquiesce or abhor, deny, etc any and all BDS activities.
The man is entitled to his opinion and
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 09:45, geoffrey mendelson
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Marc Volovic wrote:
People, RMS (as well as any other person) is entitled to support, adhere,
acquiesce or abhor, deny, etc any and all BDS activities.
The man is entitled to
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I don't agree with you, Geoff. What Richard Stallman does as a
private person does not mean the FSF in involved. As a private
person Richard Stallman has the right to boycott Israeli
institutions and universities. It does not mean that
Being significantly less conversant with US corporate law than e.g. Israeli
corporate law, I'll take your comments at face value.
Is RMS, by agreeing to the conditions set by the financial contributors to his
visit, in violation of US law? Mind - to the best of my understanding - he has
not
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Marc Volovic marcvolo...@me.com wrote:
Being significantly less conversant with US corporate law than e.g. Israeli
corporate law, I'll take your comments at face value.
Is RMS, by agreeing to the conditions set by the financial contributors to
his visit, in
On Sunday 12 June 2011 at 22:24:54 (GMT+2) Oleg Goldshmidt
p...@goldshmidt.org wrote:
f FSF falls under the anti-boycott law (and I don't know that) then
not only must RMS refuse to visit the PA, he (i.e., FSF) must report
the request (this is the legal term in the context) to the US
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
My guess is that the anti-boycott law has nothing to do with FSF or
any
other voluntary organization (like what is called amutah in Hebrew),
which is what I understand FSF to be.
They are a 501 c 3 corporation, which limits prevents them
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 22:35, Stan Goodman stan.good...@hashkedim.comwrote:
My guess is that the anti-boycott law has nothing to do with FSF or any
other voluntary organization (like what is called amutah in Hebrew),
which is what I understand FSF to be.
As far as I know, there is a law in
I do not think what he is doing is necessary illegal, especially since he
leaves open the option of a 'bidding war', where someone else pays his
expenses, but the way he handled this issue is very clumsy and unfortunate.
As I had said before, he should have checked with his sponsor before
offering
I think RMS does not have any intention of speaking, and is the OSS/FSF?GNU
version of what is known as a cock-tease, though he seems more like a plain
schmuck from a distance.
He should not speak, nor even visit Israel. He should support freedom of
expression in the west bank and Gaza by staying
One can think of a few action plans:
1. Who cares? RMS is known to be somewhat awkward, and his behavior of
hey I'm coming, oh, I'm coming only if it is not a univ., oh, wait a
second, I cannot come unless this is the boycott offices in Israel,
does not add to him much.
The advantage of this
On Friday 10 June 2011 at 16:35:43 (GMT+2) Tom Balazs
tom123onl...@gmail.com wrote:
After Dr. Richard M. Stallman (RMS) cancelled his lecture at the
University of Haifa I tried to arrange an alternative meeting hall
for him. Like some other people I thought that all that was required
was not
[a whole pile of claptrap, including previously written and quoted claptrap,
snipped]
People, RMS (as well as any other person) is entitled to support, adhere,
acquiesce or abhor, deny, etc any and all BDS activities.
(Some of) Your moral outrage is not a whit less ridiculous that agreement.
I am not worried about his opinion, but his support of a boycott of Israel,
and the fact that I have to rely on him for support of products I use.
As far as I am concerned, my present view (after RMS and Mint) is that OSS
is something to support as long as there is a commercial alternative. If in
Dear Stan,
You are, indeed, entitled to as much freedom and opportunity to BDS Israel for
its criminal policies and proclivities.
You are, indeed, entitled to as much freedom and opportunity to BDS RMS and
others for their BDS'ing Israel.
Just, please, try to do so without speechifying with a
Ah, Dear Stan, how appropriate and typical to your line of argumentation.
Hail! You are a true representative of your cause.
M
On Jun 11, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Stan Goodman wrote:
On Saturday 11 June 2011 at 06:30:36 (GMT+2) Marc Volovic
marcvolo...@me.com wrote:
Dear Stan,
You are,
Moreover, he says the ban imposed on him is NOT Israel in its entirety, but
only the Universities (the private Shenkar College seems kosher according to
him). The weird but sensible thing to do is find lecture halls outside the
universities and there would be no conflict.
So Ariel College
On 05/30/2011 10:24 AM, linux.il wrote:
Moreover, he says the ban imposed on him is NOT Israel in its entirety, but
only the Universities (the private Shenkar College seems kosher according to
him). The weird but sensible thing to do is find lecture halls outside the
universities and there would
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Ehud Karni wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FSF needs volunteers for translation Hebrew to English.
Is it translating from Hebrew to English or from English to Hebrew? In
both cases, what has to be translated?
In any case, I may be able to help here.
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FSF needs volunteers for translation Hebrew to English.
Is it translating from Hebrew to English or from English to Hebrew? In
both cases, what has to be translated?
I already translated the main page into hebrew but they always tell me
to go to this Dov dude
Quoting Oleg Goldshmidt, from the post of Sun, 12 Jan:
I am glad if it is. It is not so clear to me though, because, if you
re-read the thread, there are voices that suggest a Stallmanist line
as an official policy of Hamakor. All I did was saying that in my
opinion it is narrow, divisive,
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:33, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
The more I think about it, the more problem I have with it. I distrust
ideology (managing to respect the notion in the process), and I have
resolved many years ago that I would not be a member of any
organization whose purposes and charter
I have semi official information that reveals that bus number 49 from
Ramata Aviv to Petach Tikva should cost about 8 NIS.
Shachar.
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi!
Since Petakh-Tikva is a bit out of the way for a Ramat-Aviv-Gimel person
like me, I am planning to take a taxi there. If anyone
On 2003-01-12 Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I have semi official information that reveals that bus number 49 from
Ramata Aviv to Petach Tikva should cost about 8 NIS.
The IBM building is also some 10 or 15 minutes walk from the
Jabotinski / Geha junction. And getting there is quite easy with
public
On 2003-01-12 I wrote:
The IBM building is also some 10 or 15 minutes walk from the
On second thought, make that 20 minutes. Your mileage may vary :)
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are just drawing the line somewhere else.
I wholeheartedly agree with that - it's a line-drawing game
..
I choose to draw the line beyond fair use because fair use is an
established legal principle that would be a
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does that mean that you draw the line wherever the law goes?
That's part of it, but it also seems a reasonable place to draw a
line, which I hope is why the law is what it is. After all, I have
bought the CD legally, and I only want to listen to parts
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a side note, stressing only the technical issues means that
issues such as DRM, Trusted Computing and the DMCA are left out
altogether.
These are technical issues. One should not restrict generic
technologies because
Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Sat, 11 Jan:
I don't know what your basic disagreements are (I guess I'll have to buy
you a beer to find out :))
I think Oleg has put it very clearly in a post here, he's against the
basic ideals of freedom, and
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All of the above technologies and laws are bad on technical
reasons. That much is true. However, if your view of them is purely
technical, you will notice that they are only bad for you IF YOU ARE
USING OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE. If you are not (such as
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All of the above technologies and laws are bad on technical
reasons. That much is true. However, if your view of them is purely
technical, you will notice that they are only bad for you IF YOU ARE
USING OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE. If
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
And excuse me for being pessimistic, but I have a hunch that if the current
trends continues, book libraries will also be a thing of the past in 20 years.
How long do you think the book publishers will agree to stay out of the pay-
per-use or
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that you are bringing ideoligy into the discussion,
even as you are claiming to reject the notion.
I don't see how.
Why is it bad that you cannot rip your bought CD and pick and choose
tracks for your car? You are not, as you claim,
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
In another example, I think DMCA and DRM and treacherous computing are
evil. Why? For instance, I happen to own the latest Diana Krall CD. If
you ask me to burn a copy for you, I will refuse, and I hope we can
remain friends after that. I will,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: RMS over Humous - meeting
summery:
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Book libraries existed and nobody thought that paying $10 a year for a
library subscription (when one book costs more than that) was cheating
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: RMS over Humous - meeting
summery:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good idea. Nadav, with your permission I would like to put that up
on Hamakor.
Under Nadav's name, I hope, not as a part of Hamakor's position.
Right. I
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: RMS over Humous - meeting
summery:
I also agree with some things that RMS says. I do disagree with his
ideas about freedom though on a vary basic level, but I will only
discuss that over some free beer. ;-) On this list it would be
off
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
preaching for freedom as he does. I hope the new amuta will stress
technical issues rather than ideological ones.
I hope the amuta will replace your rather than with an as well as.
The Amuta's name has free software and open source, right? Let's
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Sat, 11 Jan:
I don't know what your basic disagreements are (I guess I'll have to buy
you a beer to find out :))
I think Oleg has put it very clearly in a post here, he's against the
basic ideals of freedom, and therefore the fact that they are
objectively
http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArtPE.jhtml?itemNo=247510contrassID=2subContrassID=13sbSubContrassID=0
I couldn't find it in the English version of haaretz
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shaul Karl wrote:
1. http://www.haaretz.co.il.
2. Click near the upper left most corner for the English
Hello Mr. Stallman, IGLU people,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:48:54PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Well, thanks to everybody who came. I did not count, but someone did,
and there were more than 30 people (34?). It was a little bit too many
for an orderly discussion, but I think some
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:48:54PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Special thanks to Muli for sharing the organizational effort, and to
Shachar who agreed to take RMS to Haifa tomorrow.
No sir, I didn't do much except give my opinion once in a while. I do
that quite easily, I have many of them.
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Special thanks to Muli for sharing the organizational effort, and to
Shachar who agreed to take RMS to Haifa tomorrow.
Hmm, let's see. Miss ~two hours of lectures and gain 1 hour private time
with RMS.
Besides, I've said before I'm looking to share the long drive
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about RMS Dinner:
...
He told me that he always plans his trips to have 24 hours spare
before his scheduled appearance. This was the first time he had about
20 hours or so, and just about everything that could go wrong did. He
came to the dinner
Nadav Har'El wrote: Re: RMS Dinner
[snip]
Oleg (and Muli, and whoever was in charge of organizing this dinner) -
thanks!
Hear hear.
[snip]
With all due respect, Stallman is not our equal, he's our
mentor/idol/hero.
We all knew him but he knew (almost) none of us. A little more
humility
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:48:54PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
One amusing question RMS asked me - and asked me to ask the gang - is
as follows. Before the trip he was contacted by two women who asked
him out, and he is going to go out with both (separately) during his
stay here. At least
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No sir, I didn't do much except give my opinion once in a while. I do
I think you are being overly modest, my friend. And that's not
counting holding the defensive position against over 30 enraged free
software enthusiasts waiting for RMS to appear. For
I ment on walla not ynet ofcourse:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
http://news.walla.co.il/ts.cgi?tsscript=itempath=4id=331040
I think it's nothing original but qoutes from old places
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
On Friday 03 January 2003 15:36, Ely Levy wrote:
RMS story in walla, maybe ;)
http://news.walla.co.il/ts.cgi?tsscript=itempath=4id=331040
I think it's nothing original but qoutes from old places
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
the RMS visit is getting closer and closer.
As well, it appears, as the war in Iraq. I just hope the whole event
won't be canceled.
To unsubscribe, send
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body,
On Monday 23 December 2002 10:49, Dvir Volk wrote:
the RMS visit is getting closer and closer.
RMS does not strike me as the kind of guy that will postpone a visit over
something silly like a little war... did you read this guy's political
doc's??
:)
tal.
As well, it appears, as the war
Unless he's willing to swim here, if you believe the newspapers and
remember the previous war, commercial flights will cease in case some
objects start flying in unauthorized vertical paths.
:-)
Practical suggestion - let's just plan as if everything is going to be
ok and at worst the plans will
On Monday 23 December 2002 14:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are fully intended to do just that ;)
tal.
Unless he's willing to swim here, if you believe the newspapers and
remember the previous war, commercial flights will cease in case some
objects start flying in unauthorized vertical
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 21:06, Omer Zak wrote:
the RMS visit is getting closer and closer. if you people are serious about
creating a list of questions for a translated interview, please send them to
me, and I'll add them to omer's and eli's.
tal.
Meanwhile I thought about questions
sure lets act like spinless people in order to please the great RMS,
how about changing it to RFC (RMS fun club?)
if it's for his honor great, if it's to please him so he would agree to
see us
btw oleg the part about we going to contact RMS so don't overflow him
and then saying that if only
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Ely Levy wrote:
oh and one last idea,
How about asking him for an interview for whatsup?
something in slashdot style where people send questions and he get
to answer the few more asked ones. I think that would make a lot of
people happy.
Beside the political questions,
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 19:43, Omer Zak wrote:
if there will be enough people who want to participate in such an interview
(send questions that they want to ask, that is) I'll be more then happy to do
the job, translate everything and post the answers to the site for everyone's
use.
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 20:40, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
btw oleg the part about we going to contact RMS so don't overflow him
and then saying that if only 10 people can you meet him then all the rest
should wait for whatever, it sounds kind of bad.
ok I have 2 to offer,
1) about whats her name law offer to prevent goverment from buying non
opensource things
2) About what he think should be done to push linux in israel and solve
the hebrew problem which stop so many people from using it.
3) What people can do to push linux into the
Meanwhile I thought about questions to RMS.
1. What is RMS' exact position about software which is burned into ROM and
put into an instrument/device/appliance? Should the customer have
access to the source code and to a means for replacing the software?
2. What if the ROM mentioned in (1)
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 21:06, Omer Zak wrote:
OK, so far i have questions from omer and eli.
keep sending them in, and I'll create a final list of questions, and post it
here for your approval.
tal.
Meanwhile I thought about questions to RMS.
1. What is RMS' exact position about
Amir Tal wrote:
for those who are (still) not updated :
http://net.nana.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=49331
I'm still not, how about a synopsis in English?
TIA,
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
MobilEye Vision Technologies Ltd, R.M.P.E House, 10 Hartom St. Har Hotzvim
Jerusalem, 91450 Israel
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:19:41PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Amir Tal wrote:
for those who are (still) not updated :
http://net.nana.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=49331
I'm still not, how about a synopsis in English?
TIA,
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
MobilEye Vision
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Actually, come to think about it, contrary to what I wrote in the
posting that puzzled you, one can argue that a device driver is a
piece of software that makes a particular piece of software work,
using knowledge of its specific characteristics that are outside of
Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The linux kernel is licensed under a license that is not exactly the GPL.
It is the GPL with an extra clause that allows binary modules (to allow
support of certain kinds of hardware, and with certain limitations, but
this is really *not* the
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you mean by `make sure that whatever your module does makes
sense out of the context of the Linux kernel'?
I guess that once I will get that sentence I will be able to understand
why it is difficult to satisfy in the case of hardware drivers.
Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The linux kernel is licensed under a license that is not exactly the GPL.
It is the GPL with an extra clause that allows binary modules (to allow
support of certain kinds of hardware, and with certain limitations, but
this is really *not* the place to
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:41, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding
too much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 01:26:03AM +0300, Christoph Bugel wrote:
On 2002-05-31, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the FSF founder.
Now he condemns the UnitedLinux (Suse, Turbo Linux, Mandrake and others joined
forces).
What next ?
Maybe you
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Bugel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eliran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: RMS is back again
On 2002-05-31, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the FSF founder
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:41, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding
too much) He _is_ right. The
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't like this? choose a different distro. Mandrake, Redhat and Debian,
..
Some of the software contained in those distributions is not free (e.g:
Netscape 4.72). But the distribution as a whole is.
I don't know about Mandrake/Red
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding too
much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom will be
ported to win32 platform.
- diego
On Friday 31 May 2002 22:29, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the
On 2002-05-31, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the FSF founder.
Now he condemns the UnitedLinux (Suse, Turbo Linux, Mandrake and others joined
forces).
What next ?
Maybe you should explain *why* you disagree with RMS.
I think RMS is right.
BTW,
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding too
much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom will be
ported to win32 platform.
It is legally possible to port GPLed software to Win32. In fact,
On Saturday 01 June 2002 02:41, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
job job, someone has to speak for those who cannt ('cause they are coding
too much) He _is_ right. The day this will happen a big part of freedom
will be ported to win32 platform.
It is legally
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Eliran wrote:
Well, here is another response of Richard M. Stallman the FSF founder.
Now he condemns the UnitedLinux (Suse, Turbo Linux, Mandrake and others
joined forces).
Let's get some facts straight first:
SuSE, TurboLinux, Caldera and Conectiva (not Mandrake)
93 matches
Mail list logo
