From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/15 Wed AM 03:39:28 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: More Kennyboy quotes
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: More Kennyboy quotes
As a matter of fact, Mitsubishi is squandering their
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A 31mm Ltd fell into my lap for a few weeks, and the lens hood is a POS.
We agree on that!
I wish it could be removed. It makes the cap wonky to take on and off
and really makes the camera huge. I'd rather have no hood at all- any
way to lose it all together?
I
Quoting Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I often thought, that copy machines may very well be the reason Canan got
the resources to delvelop great cameras.
The same didn't help Minolta much, though.
Pentax perhaps does the same by making endocopes and industrial lenses...
I believe the
I was about to suggest that. However, those hoods have become hard to find
- at least for me - can't find 'em here in the US and the connection I had
in the UK no longer lists them. Do you have a source?
BTW, until I found a better hood than the stock one for my 50/summicron, I
did just what
Filter Test
Shel
I must be one of the few who don't have a problem with it.
Dave
On 3/15/06, Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A 31mm Ltd fell into my lap for a few weeks, and the lens hood is a POS.
We agree on that!
I wish it could be removed. It makes the cap wonky to take
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/15 Wed AM 09:10:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: More Kennyboy quotes
Filter Test
Shel
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Why is it worse on digital than on film?
The flare is in the central part of the frame when using it on a film
camera, as apposed to the edges on digital?
If that is the case it must be total crap when used on a film camera.
Dave
On 3/15/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's
Never mind. I think I must have fallen asleep while typing that.
Dave
On 3/15/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it worse on digital than on film?
The flare is in the central part of the frame when using it on a film
camera, as apposed to the edges on digital?
If that is the
I was able to find a US supplier of similar hoods on ebay. Try
searching for metal lens hood.
On Mar 15, 2006, at 4:02 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was about to suggest that. However, those hoods have become hard to
find
- at least for me - can't find 'em here in the US and the connection I
On 15 Mar 2006 at 17:22, David Savage wrote:
Why is it worse on digital than on film?
The flare is in the central part of the frame when using it on a film
camera, as apposed to the edges on digital?
If that is the case it must be total crap when used on a film camera.
It's a case of
On 3/15/06, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a case of being aware of what's in the frame causing flare. I don't have
to much difficulty with the 31LTD but I have some real problems in this regard
when using my A15/3.5 on the *ist D. On the film cameras it was much easy to
keep
David Savage wrote:
On 3/15/06, Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A 31mm Ltd fell into my lap for a few weeks, and the lens hood is a POS.
We agree on that!
I wish it could be removed. It makes the cap wonky to take on and off
and really makes the camera
Let's say that any graphic card (except niche markets) you can buy at
this time will contain GPU. Any Geforce/Radeon has a programmable GPU.
On 3/14/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The key is that video cards can contain GPUs, but not all video cards
do.
Godfrey
On Mar 14,
Jack Davis wrote:
You must have missed my original post wherein I related having taken a
few shots with a borrowed DL. I posed a question about jpg file size
which led to A respondent suggesting I check out some RAW. Planning to
do so this weekend using some of my own glass.
Yes,
Build yourself the biggest plane in the world in seven minutes.
You'll probably need a fast connection for this.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3046542226114078023
That's a huge torque wrench they are using
-
Email sent from
Thanks! The link is now archived.
Jack
--- E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
You must have missed my original post wherein I related having taken
a
few shots with a borrowed DL. I posed a question about jpg file size
which led to A respondent suggesting I check out
I get a black rectangle over a Google screen.(?)
Have broadband cable connection. Did I not wait long enough?
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build yourself the biggest plane in the world in seven minutes.
You'll probably need a fast connection for this.
On 3/14/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect they are squandering resources trying to market them in NA. The
seem well recieved elsewhere.
I once owned a Dodge Colt.
Need I say more?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
The fixed hood is not efficiently sized for the 16x24mm format,
that's why. A 31mm lens should have a hood about 1-1.25 inches in
depth at this diameter.
Godfrey
On Mar 15, 2006, at 1:22 AM, David Savage wrote:
Why is it worse on digital than on film?
The flare is in the central part of
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/15 Wed PM 02:30:46 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT A380 in seven minutes
I get a black rectangle over a Google screen.(?)
Have broadband cable connection. Did I not wait long enough?
Jack
Probably. Sometimes thay can
mike wilson wrote:
Build yourself the biggest plane in the world in seven minutes.
You'll probably need a fast connection for this.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3046542226114078023
That's a huge torque wrench they are using
Pretty neat stuff. Still, I dread going through
I suppose it's a bit unseemly for me to make comment (or am I making
excuses) about a photo that I'm posting, but I'll do it anyway.
I know this isn't terribly sharp, as it was handheld about about
1/15th or 1/30th, aperture wide-open, and I think I missed the focus a
bit. The lighting with the
I like the composition, and in a web size the shot appears to be relatively
sharp. My biggest nit is the burned out highlight on his hand and jacket. A
stop less exposure overall would solve this and make the shot more dramatic
IMO. You might try scanning the negative and see if there's enough
frank theriault wrote:
I suppose it's a bit unseemly for me to make comment (or am I making
excuses) about a photo that I'm posting, but I'll do it anyway.
I know this isn't terribly sharp, as it was handheld about about
1/15th or 1/30th, aperture wide-open, and I think I missed the focus a
On 3/14/06, Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the PDMLer's attending GFM this June.
Logo is just about set up. One last tweak and inspection by one of our
Sr Units.g
Do you prefer a hat that has a sloped or contoured front like the link
below, or
It's a good shot.
My only comment is the scan probably isn't doing the print justice.
Dave
On 3/15/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose it's a bit unseemly for me to make comment (or am I making
excuses) about a photo that I'm posting, but I'll do it anyway.
I know this
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Christian wrote:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200/d200-vs-4x5.htm
Needless to add...this is highly :)
At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there...
I agree with you.
Wonder whose they are?
HAR!
--
Christian
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/15 Wed PM 03:08:01 GMT
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Cool Jazz
I suppose it's a bit unseemly for me to make comment (or am I making
excuses) about a photo that I'm posting, but I'll do it anyway.
I know this
I don't think I'd have noticed the softness in this image. I feel it
may add to the mood. I like it, for whatever reason.
An LX shutter would have probably interrupted the music. ;-)
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose it's a bit unseemly for me to make comment (or am I
I have one for in/ft and lb/ft...that one must be for Ton/ft
CW
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
That's a huge torque wrench they are using
clip-on ears eh?
Style #1 fo' shizzle.
CW
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: OT Need to determine hat type for the GFMers
On 3/14/06, Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To
On 3/15/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I'd have noticed the softness in this image. I feel it
may add to the mood. I like it, for whatever reason.
An LX shutter would have probably interrupted the music. ;-)
Ker-Chunk!!
LOL
Thanks, Jack, and everyone else who's
On 3/15/06, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clip-on ears eh?
That rocks...
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of technical issues, but a moody and interesting photography
nonetheless.
There is some data in the blown out hand, so a *little* bit of
recovery is possible there. The blacks are a little soft, they should
be deeper. Not a lot to work with but some gentle shaping with dodge
and
There's much to like here. Composition, the pose of my name brother, he is
supaah cool. I kind of like the burned out hand. It directs my eye to the
most important part of frame. There is no way to miss the trumpet. All this
makes the technical difficulties a non issue.
There is one thing do I
I asked a few questions about FA* 200/4 macro which was in stock in Poland a
few days ago. I went there today unfortunately in store it turned out to be
only A* 200/4 macro. As I wanted good performance at longer distances in
such a lens and A* users told me that it is not as good as FA* version
that's a big 'un. both the plane and the torque wrench.
I can only imagine the scene at heathrow immigration having two of
those land at the same time.
G
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:12 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Build yourself the biggest plane in the world in seven minutes.
You'll probably need a
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Lots of technical issues, but a moody and interesting photography
nonetheless.
There is some data in the blown out hand, so a *little* bit of
recovery is possible there. The blacks are a little soft, they should
be deeper. Not a lot to work with but some gentle
On Mar 15, 2006, at 4:25 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've never had a problem (other than wishing it could be removed so I
could use a Cokin holder and split ND filter). Never had flare issues
with this lens.
Here's the flare problem I found:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FA31-flare-0759.jpg
I have no personal experience with the A* 200 macro, only the A* 100.
I've, however, read some good reviews.
Personally, I prefer to manually focus when doing macro work. It
tolerates my hyper-selective penchant to fuss with the scene without
fighting me.
Jack
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL
It's not really a flare issue with the lens though... the flare is a factor
of the way it was used, right? IOW, any lens will exhibit a degree of flare
under the right circumstances.
In this case I would guess holding a hand up on the sunward side of the lens
might have eliminated the flare,
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and appreciated.
Boris
Don't seem to be getting emails on my ISP email program, but i see them in the
archives.
Dave
What street is that. I want to look it up on my map of TA.
I like the shot, BTW. It works nicely.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
I already have a photoshop CS license.
I just think it's too much trouble. And iWatermarks can include logo's etc.
very easily.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. marts 2006 21:49
Til:
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Love it. I can imagine this on my wall.
Malcolm
Dynamic ;-)
Seriously. You have turned a static scene into something dynamic. At first
glance I saw that as a contradiction. After a moment of reflection I
realised it opens for a lot of interpretations. May I suggest a new title,
City life? Kind of cliché, but thats what I see underneath the
Get yourself a good tripod. LOL
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as
On Mar 15, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Tom C wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FA31-flare-0759.jpg
It's not really a flare issue with the lens though... the flare is
a factor of the way it was used, right? IOW, any lens will exhibit
a degree of flare under the right circumstances.
Of
On Mar 15, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and
appreciated.
No need to be brutal. It works as an interesting graphic image, but
I'm not sure if it solves the issue you had in
On 3/15/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mucked it up good :)
That worked well, Godfrey
Frank - i like this one a lot, the trumpet player very
strong and the pattern
of all the hands. What were they playing? just curious.
I like Godfrey's mucking too, Ann. Thanks,
Does the Kalt flare at all? What the 31mm needs is a hood like the
Heliopan that doesn't flare.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The Kalt 1 deep metal lens hoods that I use on other lenses in this
focal length range won't fit the FA31 due to the fixed hood being in
the
A charming little street in Liège with just a hint of a gradient and a
wonderful view on the scenic valley of the river Meuse, basked in the
beautyful light of the sunset on a cold winter day.
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1323943
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG -
I like the image. It's pretty and well balanced. However, this technique has
been used a lot, and, in my opinion, the results don't vary enough to warrant
more and more executions of this type.
-- Original message --
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
sigh What I meant is does the shape of the Kalt flare, or is it
straight, like the Heliopan?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff
Does the Kalt flare at all? What the 31mm needs is a hood like the
Heliopan that doesn't flare.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 15, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Tom C wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FA31-flare-0759.jpg
It's not really a flare issue with the lens though... the flare is a factor
of the way it was used, right? IOW, any lens will exhibit a degree of
Yep, the technique is trite, but it certainly warrants experimentation,
especially by someone who hasn't done it before.
I also agree with Godders about this not being the best way to instill some
dynamics into a photo. I don't think dynamic necessarily means movement.
It can be emotional, or
On 3/15/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and appreciated.
On Mar 15, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Ah, the joys of Canonware :-P
What does Canon have to do with the design of the FA31? I have
several Canon lenses and have not found any flare problems with the
correct Canon hoods fitted, using them on the 10D.
although it
The hood is a straight barrel but is stepped outwards from the filter
attachment threads by about 4-5mm. The FA31 doesn't have the
clearance for that.
Godfrey
On Mar 15, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Does the Kalt flare at all? What the 31mm needs is a hood like the
Heliopan
Nice! The harsh lighting works, and the guitar leads
the eye to the trumpeter. His ear is in focus, it
appears; the softness of the nose-trumpet plane is too
subtle to matter, as long as you don't make this an
8x10!
Rick
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose it's a bit
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:52:15 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, how about Eric?
Are you refering, perchance, to Eric the Half a Bee?
Who must, ipso eo facto, half not be :o)
Who do you think you are, anyway, the
That's what I figgered ... tks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The hood is a straight barrel but is stepped outwards from the filter
attachment threads by about 4-5mm. The FA31 doesn't have the
clearance for that.
Godfrey
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Does the Kalt
Ralf,
Love the street, but the array of modern technology bearing down from
the background is a disturbing. At least that's the message I receive.
Well made point, if with tongue-in-cheek.
Jack
--- Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A charming little street in Liège with just a hint
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Love the street, but the array of modern technology bearing down from
the background is a disturbing.
This modern technology is Belgium's ailing steel industry. Most of what
you see there has been closed down, years ago.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher -
Ralf,
Loving your post-industrial work. Could be any number of cities in the
Mid-western US...
CW
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Mailingliste pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:31 PM
Subject: PESO: Rue Bordelais
On 3/14/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to lay off the pesos for a while. I've posted quite a few
in the last couple of weeks. But, darn, the list is slow. So here's an
ode to slowness:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4218507size=lg
I like the reflection -
Woohoo! Beautiful. Lots of mood here, Frank. As far as the
technical stuff goes, technical schmechnical.
On 3/15/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose it's a bit unseemly for me to make comment (or am I making
excuses) about a photo that I'm posting, but I'll do it anyway.
On 3/14/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to know I would :)
Great grab, Frank..
Xo,
ann
Thought of you when I saw it! LOL
Thanks, Ann.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I find the fascinating. The background ugliness is in a mist and the attractive
foreground structures are crisp and clear. A very complex, yet compelling
image. Good work.
Paul
--- Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A charming little street in Liège with just a hint of a
On 3/15/06, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A charming little street in Liège with just a hint of a gradient and a
wonderful view on the scenic valley of the river Meuse, basked in the
beautyful light of the sunset on a cold winter day.
Nice capture, Paul.
If it were mine I'd clone out the stuff in the LLH LRH corners.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Slow
I was going to lay off the pesos for a while. I've posted quite a few
in the last couple of weeks.
Thanks Ken. I took a look at the lower left and right corners, and I'm divided.
I think the elements as they are tend to frame the image. But it might be
better without them. Perhaps I'll try it and compare.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL
Knarf, I like the image the title.
The image just exudes Cool Jazz
Well captured.
I might crop out the stuff on the wall in back of the guy on the left.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Cool Jazz
I suppose it's a bit
Hi,
Anyone have an 18-55mm zoom (the kind that comes with many an *ist DS)
for sale?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I have one for in/ft
That's a really interesting torque wrench!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT A380 in seven minutes
I have one for in/ft and lb/ft...that one must be for Ton/ft
CW
- Original Message -
Sylwek
Do you recall what they were asking for the A* 200 macro?
Was it also new?
Kenneth Waller
(who has an A* 200 Macro, but might know someone who wants one)
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Boris, I like it. Has a certain sophistication about it.
Nice to see you trying something different, we all should.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tel Aviv
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Ralf, I really like what you've captured. I don't feel the top part adds to
the image. If it were mine I'd crop out from the roof line on the right to
the top.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Rue Bordelais
A charming
On Mar 15, 2006, at 8:12, mike wilson wrote:
Build yourself the biggest plane in the world in seven minutes.
You'll probably need a fast connection for this.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3046542226114078023
That was fun.
I missed the torque wrench, though!
-Charles
--
Tokina SD 400/5.6, VGC condition. A class. Both caps. Just one
issue -- it's missing the focus grip.
Get one from Tokina or find a bad one to cannibalize.
$125 shipped (US).
MX with Winder. Works great. Winder has wire connected which could
be attached to a switch for electronic firing.
I've not been able to participate on the list as much as I'd like to,
of late. Work's been just too busy.
This week is March break here in Ontario, so my ex asked if I could
take the kids for 1/2 the week. They're arriving tonight, and I've
booked off the next two days at work.
It's very
On 3/12/06, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
The stills camera isn't getting used alot at the moment, as I seem to be
travelling from one BMX event to the next. And when I'm there, I'm
usually videoing her races and watching others in between.
I did manage to get the
On second though. I know what you're going to do with it :-(
Just joking.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Cotty
It's written in German
http://www.pentax.de/_de/photo/news/index.php?photonewsgruppe=news_id=151
http://babel.altavista.com/translate.dyn
PS I haven't received any email from the list server for about 12 hours, my
Gmail account still seems to be getting main though and all my other mail
From one dad to another, have a great time. And we'll be expecting a lot of
great shots.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've not been able to participate on the list as much as I'd like to,
of late. Work's been just too
Been no problem with list traffic here.
G
On Mar 15, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
..PS I haven't received any email from the list server for about 12
hours, my
Gmail account still seems to be getting main though and all my
other mail
accounts are OK again, list burp I guess?
Going to Canonize it?
j
On 3/15/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone have an 18-55mm zoom (the kind that comes with many an *ist DS)
for sale?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf, I really like what you've captured. I don't feel the top part adds to
the image. If it were mine I'd crop out from the roof line on the right to
the top.
Beg to differ. The steel mill in the background is at least as typical
for the place as the
I expected it at the end of the month and was pleasantly surprised
when it appeared yesterday.
Here's a photo to compare it to the original Optio S. This still
looks and feels great but the image quality is inferior, of course.
But it does have a real view finder!
Fernando Terrazzino schrieb:
Very nice Jens, it's that kind of photo that shares a moment/story
with the viewer. I also liked this one
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/112596108/in/set-72057594082259138/
;-)
Fernando
I like this one very much, too. She's really pretty!
And a grand daughter
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/15 Wed PM 04:14:39 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT A380 in seven minutes
I have one for in/ft and lb/ft...that one must be for Ton/ft
CW
Or Newton/Kilometres 8-)))
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Here's a list of Pentax products which will disappear from the catalogue
this summer:
http://www.pentax.de/_de/photo/news/index.php?photonewsgruppe=news_id
=151
Most notably the 645 and the 67.
Sic transit... :-(
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private
On 15/3/06, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Going to Canonize it?
Of course not. Canon make an 18-55 but I wouldn't personally consider
any such lens. It's for my wife to use on her *ist DS that we purchased
used from a listmember body-only. At the moment it has a 35-70 macro on
it
Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most notably the 645 and the 67.
I've just re-read the announcement and, as I understand it, production
of the articles on the list has already ceased.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage:
I'm considering an EF 16-35 2.8L but can't afford it unless I sell some
other gear, or maybe some pics...more on that soon!
Good news on Alamy?
It was coming... I bet sales were absolutely abysmal the last two years.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralf R. Radermacher)
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net (Pentax Mailingliste)
Subject: Re: Pentax kills analog medium format
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:38:14
Nicely done abstract. Looks like living room art from the 60's.
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Tel Aviv
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:51:38 +0200
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography
Huh? I have the F35-70/3.5-4.5 macro and find it to be a pretty good
lens overall...
Godfrey
On Mar 15, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Cotty wrote:
At the moment it has a 35-70 macro on
it that's little better than a Coke bottle.
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
