dmarc-discuss

Messages by Date

2016/11/14 Re: [dmarc-discuss] FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/14 Re: [dmarc-discuss] FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/14 Re: [dmarc-discuss] FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/14 Re: [dmarc-discuss] FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/14 [dmarc-discuss] FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Tracking down issues Jonathan Knopp via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Tracking down issues Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/05 [dmarc-discuss] Tracking down issues Jonathan Knopp via dmarc-discuss
2016/11/01 [dmarc-discuss] AUTO: Oliver Endrikat is out of the office (returning 02.11.2016) Oliver Endrikat via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] mkdb.mysql or schema.mysql? Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/26 [dmarc-discuss] mkdb.mysql or schema.mysql? Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/25 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/25 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/14 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 [dmarc-discuss] Report sizes and transports, was Re: Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Matt Simerson via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Dave Crocker via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 [dmarc-discuss] dmarc.org breaks dkim & dmarc Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 56, Issue 5 Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 56, Issue 5 Lynne Mack via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/04 [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent Povl Hessellund Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/10/02 [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/30 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent Mitchell Kuch via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/22 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/21 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Povl Hessellund Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/21 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/20 [dmarc-discuss] ARC Interoperability testing this Friday, 9/23 Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/19 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Povl Hessellund Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/19 Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deliverability of DMARC reports Internet Security via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deliverability of DMARC reports Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/10 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deliverability of DMARC reports John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deliverability of DMARC reports Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deliverability of DMARC reports A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/09/09 [dmarc-discuss] Deliverability of DMARC reports Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/11 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/10 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/05 [dmarc-discuss] exegesis: pass and fail together Thomas Krichel via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] SendOnBehalfOf in O365 John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/07/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] SendOnBehalfOf in O365 Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] SendOnBehalfOf in O365 Povl Hessellund Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] SendOnBehalfOf in O365 Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/30 [dmarc-discuss] SendOnBehalfOf in O365 Povl Hessellund Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] [dmarc-ietf] ARC adoption Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] ARC adoption A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] ARC adoption Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] ARC adoption Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] ARC adoption Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] ARC adoption Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/28 [dmarc-discuss] ARC adoption A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/14 Re: [dmarc-discuss] hello all Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/06/14 [dmarc-discuss] hello all Abhishek Tiwari via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/26 [dmarc-discuss] Overview Slides on ARC Available Online Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/24 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Troubleshooting MS ruf Carlos P via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/24 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Troubleshooting MS ruf Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/24 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Troubleshooting MS ruf Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/24 [dmarc-discuss] Troubleshooting MS ruf Carlos P via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] submission via google / dmarc fail Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 51, Issue 11 Christopher Sweeney via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 51, Issue 11 Lynne Mack via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/09 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path Sistemisti Posta via dmarc-discuss
2016/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] submission via google / dmarc fail A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] submission via google / dmarc fail A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/22 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ru Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/19 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Failure reports from Microsoft servers due to SPF and DKIM both failing for forwarded/resent messages Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/19 [dmarc-discuss] Failure reports from Microsoft servers due to SPF and DKIM both failing for forwarded/resent messages Geir Waade via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Strong hint Microsoft is heading to p=reject ? Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 [dmarc-discuss] Strong hint Microsoft is heading to p=reject ? J. Gomez via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 [dmarc-discuss] New <reason> <type> From Google? John Corey Miller via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 John Mears via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/06 [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] please clarify A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] please clarify Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] please clarify Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] please clarify A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] please clarify Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/05 [dmarc-discuss] please clarify A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Michiel van de Vis via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Lugo, Dave via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Lugo, Dave via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 Duggan, Anita via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/04 [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report Nick via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 Jacob Evans via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 Duggan, Anita via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 John Corey Miller via dmarc-discuss
2016/04/01 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365 Duggan, Anita via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/29 [dmarc-discuss] Deferring virtual ARC interop by a week: now April 8th Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Larry Finch via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Ben Greenfield via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Udeme Ukutt via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/25 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Udeme Ukutt via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/25 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/22 [dmarc-discuss] Semi-OT: Next ARC Interop Testing: April 1st Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/22 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Reminder: Yahoo DMARC policy change on March 28th Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/22 [dmarc-discuss] Reminder: Yahoo DMARC policy change on March 28th Sumeet Solanki via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/10 [dmarc-discuss] Two ARC implementations tested at interoperability event Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/03/08 [dmarc-discuss] Update: Yahoo DMARC policy Sumeet Solanki via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/29 [dmarc-discuss] Yahoo DMARC policy update Sumeet Solanki via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/17 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Ben Greenfield via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/17 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Ben Greenfield via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Ben Greenfield via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Email storage Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Email storage Chris Meidinger via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Email storage John Wilson via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/16 [dmarc-discuss] Email storage jim c via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions John Levine via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
2016/02/15 Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss