- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: Dan says SS = SSA
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:06:35AM -0700, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> > Different types of risk, sorry. I'm sl
> Let's further suppose that the immortality breakthrough happens in 2100.
> Then everyone who dies between now and then is dying solely because of
> the past attitude of the Christian authorities: Christianity is
> responsible for *billions* of deaths in the near future. (And you can
> make a si
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: America the Theocracy
> Dan said:
>
> > So, I guess the fact that officially atheistic countries, such as the
> > USSR have ha
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: Winning the War on Terror
> From: Gautam Mukunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> snip
>
> >> democracy one day in the future. Ho
- Original Message -
From: "Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
>
> Sonja
> GCU: Top AND bottom posting is eviler still
A sm
- Original Message -
From: "Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
> Dan Minette
- Original Message -
From: "Damon Agretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: America the Theocracy
> > Of course not: it just means that such countries
> > will also be partly
> > responsible for some o
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: Winning the War on Terror
> Out of curiosity, you mentioned one year ago that if the number of dead
crosses the 10,000 mark, you would consider
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: Winning the War on Terror
> From: Dan Minette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> snip
&g
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
> And I'm just LOL over the quantity of response I was able to generate
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Winning the War on Terror
I missed writing a line. To clarify,
My suggestion was/is:
- Original Message -
From: "Damon Agretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: America the Theocracy
> > Your point is mostly valid, but I think even you
> > give the Greeks a bit too
> > much credit. Ph
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Winning the War on Terror
> --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: Winning the War on Terror
> Dan Minette wrote:
> >
> > - Origina
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Higgs Boson might be found
> In a message dated 4/11/2004 4:06:14 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > -- Ronn! :)
> >
> > Professional
- Original Message -
From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:42 AM
Subject: Alternate History
>Announcing his candidacy for the 2004 Republican presidential nomination,
>Senator John McCain said today that "George W. Bush was very foolis
- Original Message -
From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: High-Level Meetings Re: Bush wanted more specifics
> So Clarke couldn't call a meeting of the principals to consider his
>ideas, as he desp
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Beck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Alternate History
> > Which is fine, since we didn't _get_ a high number of
> > American casualties. Any death is a tragedy,
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Alternate History
> --- Thomas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then I guess Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Bush,
> > etc.
- Original Message -
From: "iaamoac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Alternate History
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Pregnancy update
> I had my first (but not my last) ultrasound exam with this pregnancy.
>
> Both twin girls are fine so far.
>
> Their parents, on the ot
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Sharkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:45 PM
Subject: RE: The Geek Test
>
> Jon Gabriel wrote:
> >The Geek Test: http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html
> >I ranked: 44.3787% - Major Geek
>
> 38.65878% - Major Geek
- Original Message -
From: "Han Tacoma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Nukes found with reactor vessel woes-NRC
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Mi
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Dan Minette
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:40 AM
> > > To: Killer Bs Discussion
> > > Subject: Re: Nukes found with reactor vessel woes-NRC
> > >
> > > One qui
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: beware the BIOS
> On 28 May 2003 at 3:07, The Fool wrote:
>
> > Phoenix wants to be able to track, disable, wipe hard drives,
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: uranium
I wanted to ask you a question before Teri and I leave for a cruise to
celebrate our 25th anniversary. (in other words
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: Political Compass
> In a message dated 5/25/2003 7:30:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I don't think so. I've watc
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Spam van Baardwijk
>> But the way I am, I'd get into an argument with myself.
>What would be really embarrassing would be to
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Se
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
> Yea, but that's just becasue the force of g
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
> Dan said:
>
> >> Yea, but that's just becasue the force of gravity at the sun is
> >> great
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
> >Chad,
> >
> >Are you speaking hypothetica-probably or did you do some calculating?
> >
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Mon
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:31:49PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
>
> > Not all religions. And please don't think th
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:48:31PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> &g
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:11:55PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
>
> > They are simply being completely closed-minde
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:45:21PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
>
> > And you ignored my core argument, which is t
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: Twenty (or so) Questions, was Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:32:06AM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> > I think, al
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: Where are the European hypocrites?
> If it's not necessarily anti-Semitism to criticize Israeli actions (and I
> certainly don't think it necessarily is), then what is k
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Twenty (or so) Questions, was Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:08:04PM -050
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: Where are the European hypocrites?
> Dan Minette wrote:
> >
> > - Ori
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: Twenty (or so) Questions, was Re: Plonkworthy?
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jan Coffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: "Reggie Bautista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Twenty (or so) Questions, was Re: Plonkworthy?
> Erik wrote:
> >the·o·ry( P ) Pronunciation Key (th-r, thîr)
> >n. pl. the·o·ries
> [snip]
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Where are the European hypocrites?
> Julia said:
>
> > The thing is, Texas has more to lose by leaving the US than it has to
>
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Where are the European hypocrites?
> Dan said:
>
> > But, that's not quite fair, because that's not exactly what happened.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Where are the European hypocrites?
> Dan said:
>
> > How about, over a period of years, the US is inundated by foreigners
> > w
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Where are the European hypocrites?
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:06:24AM -0500, Steve Sloan II wrote:
>
> > Instead, Europe decided
Gautam, do you know Steven Miller at the Harvard School of Government well
enough to have an opinion of him?
Dan M.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Question for Gautam, with possible thread following
> Dan,
> Yes - I know him quite well, as amatter of fact. He's
> a good
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: WMD
> Deborah Harrell wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm vocally left in certain areas, but I don't think
> > too many liberals own guns or
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Interpreting language (was RE: A friendly request JVB)
> While every person must be responsible for their own actions, and while
it
Catching up.
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
>Nice to have you back.
Thank you
>How was the cruise?
It was good. The service on the cruise
An unfinished response to a fairly old post.
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: Steven Miller Re: Question for Gautam, with possible thread
following
> Isn't there s
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject: RE: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
>Is there a belief, either official or unofficial, that they cannot get
in
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
>
> Given, however, that the Catholic Church predates the Bible by severa
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Twenty (or so) Questions, was Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:27:14AM -0500, Da
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
> >
>
> Not being argumentative, but making assumptions based on what I remem
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
>
> One very interesting interpritation I have come across ( and give a lot
of
>
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
>
> OK... So they have these lists of Popes that span 2000 years, with
da
- Original Message -
From: "Damon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Constantine's "cross" may have been mushroom cloud frommeteor
impact
>
> >The rise of the dark ages along with the rise the popes and 'u
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
>
> --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTE
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: Question Regarding Religion and Atheism
> As you can see, Christian values place God above all, then fellow man.
The
> individ
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:30 PM
Subject: Why the 80's Were Better for the Poor than the 90's
> The comparative benefits of the economies of the 80's and 90's has been
> widely discussed on this
I'll respond to Jan's message in pieces:
> Here eat this bread which has a high probablility of having an
halusinogen in
> it and drink these firmented grapes which have alchohaul in it.
No, but lets look at your evidence. I looked up ergot and found:
http://www.killerplants.com/herbal-folklor
One of the truisms that has been accepted by me, and others, is that the US
ecconomy has been growing faster than Europe's, and that this reflects the
advantages of less governmental control of the ecconomy. I decided to try
to find the numbers on this.
I took longer term growth: '73-'00. I thin
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
> Dan said:
>
> > One of the truisms that has been accepted by me, and others, is that
> > the
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: Comparision of ecconomic growth
>
> >
> >Now, this is not a certainty; all curves are not regular and
> >extremely well
> >beha
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
> On 26 Jun 2003 at 13:07, Dan Minette wrote:
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
> --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
>
> Having just spent the last week or so furiously
> studying worldwide demographics, the sit
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
>
> On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 11:57 pm, Dan M
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Humor] RE: Question Regarding Religion and Atheism
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:25:06PM -0500, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> > But
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
At 06:16 PM 6/26/03 -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>>R
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
> On 26 Jun 2003 at 17:57, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> &
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > Another example is
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
At 09:11 PM 6/26/03 -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>-
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:30:33PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote
I've been quite, because I'm still overwhelm
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of ecconomic growth
O
Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Twenty (or so) Questions, was Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:46:46PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> At some level, yes.
> We've had this discussion before -- the concept of free-will as you >use
it is just as useless a concept as god. But morality, as I've >argued
above, is quite useful in progressing towards goals.
As a useful fiction to persuade people, certainly (actually persuade
assumes free will, the uttering
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: No conflicts between selfishness and morality?
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > Let me g
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: No conflicts between selfishness and morality?
> Jan Coffey wrote:
> > --- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>Isn't
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: Sandy Kofax
> --- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What about Bob Gibson?
> >
> > Doug
>
> A good addition to t
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: No conflicts between selfishness and morality?
humans
> (most?) fall back upon these instincts when their life is threatened.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: No conflicts between selfishness and morality?
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > The poi
I decided to finish my reply on religion based ethics, since there've been
comments on me ducking the issue. I am more than happy to discuss it; its
just that it takes a bit of time to clearly express my thoughts on it.
>Even if man is 'created in the image and likeness of God' that says
>nothing
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Same-sex marriage
> William T Goodall wrote:
>
> > So why are US Conservatives against same-sex marriage? Do they want to
> > f
Well, I've not been posting for a while because I've been overwhelmed with
1) Planning my parents' funerals
2) A heavy work load
3) Preparing for my wife's operation.
But, I've got a bit of time now, so I'll try to catch up on posts I owe an
answer to.
Dan M.
__
I think that enough has been bandied about the relationship between
science and knowledge that it would be worthwhile to discuss this topic
directly. I'll put forth, once again, viewpoints that I hold.
The purpose of science is to model and predict phenomenon. It also allows
us to manipulate phen
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:19:43PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > As a useful fiction to persuade people, certainly (actually persuade
> > assumes free will,
>
> If you say so. Of course, that is a meaningless statement.
>
> > But, "ought" is rathe
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: Free will and physics
> I did not label goals rational and irrational -- in fact, in this thread
> I specifically stated that my s
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Irregulars query: air pressure in spinning habitats
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:31:54AM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
>
> > Ac
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: I'm back
> Well, I've not been posting for a while because I've been overwhelme
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: Religion based ethics
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> >
> > One of the conclusi
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Science and knowledge
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:01:20PM -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
>
> > Hey! What about the astronomy examp
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Science and knowledge
> >> The purpose of science is not to help us understand reality; it is not
> > about the truth. Indeed, one of my favori
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: Science and knowledge
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:08:43AM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>
>
> I wouldn't say it's a post you owe me an answer to, but in the middle of
> another thread I mentioned an alternate interpretation of quantum
mechanics
> along with a link to the original paper. I'd love to see your opinion of
it
> when you get a chance. It's called the transactional interpret
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Science and knowledge
>
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 06:08 am, Dan Minette w
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: Science and knowledge
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > I think the key to reco
201 - 300 of 2739 matches
Mail list logo
