Am Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2003 23:53 schrieb Thierry Vignaud:
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
Cool. Something to play with in future :) . As said before, I
can't really afford to work on/with cooker, this way might be a
lot better solution
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
Cool. Something to play with in future :) . As said before, I
can't really afford to work on/with cooker, this way might be a
lot better solution for me to contribute to Mandrake
Good conception. It looks
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
- What should we do to improve the Wiki.
Create test plans or just simple requests for outside testers when a major
feature is added or package updated...
Test Plans,
Brilliant!!! Put 'em on the third CD of the download set and then
everyone who is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Felmey wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:46, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 05:38, Brad Felmey wrote:
Also, a place where folks can go get urpmi lines. Not just for stuff
like MdkClub and mirrors, but kind of like Debian
Ainsi parlait Vincent Danen :
really nasty bugs for fixing... not little things like fonts in gkrellm).
Vincent, yet another provocation, and i'll give you gkrellm package back :-)
--
The legibility of the signature is inversely proportional to the importance of
the artist.
--
Ainsi parlait Buchan Milne :
Vincent Danen wrote:
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 11:37:22PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
This is what @linux-mandrake.com addresses are for.
But again, there is no documented policy (and maybe even the
resitrictions
on what you should use it for) anywhere, so
Ainsi parlait Buchan Milne :
Brad Felmey wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:46, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 05:38, Brad Felmey wrote:
Also, a place where folks can go get urpmi lines. Not just for stuff
like MdkClub and mirrors, but kind of like Debian has a list of
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
really nasty bugs for fixing... not little things like fonts in gkrellm).
Vincent, yet another provocation, and i'll give you gkrellm package back :-)
hehehe... oops.
/me runs and hides
=)
--
MandrakeSoft Security;
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
And contributers not being subscribed to maintainers mailing-list, whereas
half of traffic on this list is pure spam...
and ppl actually discovering there is a maintainers mailing-list because
they stumble upon a msg like this in
On Wed Oct 01 23:17 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
And contributers not being subscribed to maintainers mailing-list, whereas
half of traffic on this list is pure spam...
and ppl actually discovering there is a maintainers
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Wed Oct 01 23:17 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
And contributers not being subscribed to maintainers mailing-list, whereas
half of traffic on this list is pure spam...
and ppl
Buchan Milne wrote:
But, before doing that, ensure you have working spam filters :-/
It became subscribers only recently. I got rejected few days ago because
I don't post with the right address.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:27:15PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
and ppl actually discovering there is a maintainers mailing-list because
they stumble upon a msg like this in cooker?
Send an email with subscribe maintainers to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IIRC.
(does this work? If so, should it be added to
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Luca Berra wrote:
But, before doing that, ensure you have working spam filters :-/
there is a wonderful package in contribs called amavisd-new
it is still a bit difficult to set it up with postfix, but i hope that
when cooker reopens it will be possible to have some
Ainsi parlait Buchan Milne :
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Wed Oct 01 23:17 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
And contributers not being subscribed to maintainers mailing-list,
whereas half of traffic on this list is
Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and it
is ridiculous and too confusing. Some one will say that you can install
what you want and leave out other stuff, but if you use urpmi and/or
gurpmi it still installs all the packages as before because of
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scherer wrote:
On Monday 29 September 2003 13:38, Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and
it is ridiculous and too confusing.
debian does it, suse too.
Some
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Felix Miata wrote:
5-A usable normal boot and/or rescue floppy should be at least offered
for creation during install. After install, creating a boot and/or
rescue floppy should actually be possible on any system. Barring that,
the creation process
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:09 am, Randy Welch wrote:
Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and it
is ridiculous and too confusing. Some one will say that you can install
what you want and leave out other stuff, but if you use urpmi and/or
gurpmi
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:11, Randy Welch wrote:
(why do I need cups when installing samba...)
Because if SaMBa is ever to use some of the special features of CUPS
(e.g. print to PDF), it needs to access CUPS through the library. You
shouldn't need all of CUPS, just the library.
Cheers; Leon
On Monday 29 September 2003 18:56, Nora Etukudo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote:
Not all of us have high bandwith connection. I test cooker at home, but
i can download easily at work : i can download an iso with only rpms
modified at work, and use
Le Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:27, Texstar a écrit :
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:09 am, Randy Welch wrote:
Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this
Do you know Debian ?
and it
is ridiculous and too confusing. Some one will say that you can
Am Montag, 29. September 2003 18:40 schrieb Vincent Danen:
On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 02:36:41PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
[...]
- How to have more contributors?
A bugzilla (or similar product) for the release version? Seems
strange I know but if you hook people on the concept as
Am Montag, 29. September 2003 01:34 schrieb James Sparenberg:
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 01:19, Warly wrote:
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these
days to have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- We
On Sun 28 Sep 2003 at 08:19, Warly wrote:
| It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these
| days to have some brainstorm.
|
| May you give your opinion on :
|
| - What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
1. N America mirrors... out-of-date, inaccessible with too many
already
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:00, Doc Tree wrote:
| - What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development.
1. START EARLIER.
Huh? Earlier than what? Do you want us to go back in time to June and
start there? :)
other available serial HDs. C. Include the latest stable version
of {list including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Danen wrote:
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 11:37:22PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
This is what @linux-mandrake.com addresses are for.
But again, there is no documented policy (and maybe even the
resitrictions
on what you should use it for)
Le Mardi 30 Septembre 2003 10:41, Steffen Barszus a écrit :
http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
Cool. Something to play with in future :) . As said before, I can't
really afford to work on/with cooker, this way might be a lot better
solution for me to contribute to Mandrake
Good conception. It
Le Mardi 30 Septembre 2003 11:03, Steffen Barszus a écrit :
The next step would be to make the development of tools a continues
project rather than a point/major release function. Create a fourth
area called testing on the mirrors. This area differs from updates
in that it isn't a bug
Laurent Montel wrote:
Le Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:27, Texstar a écrit :
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:09 am, Randy Welch wrote:
Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this
Do you know Debian ?
and it
is ridiculous and too confusing. Some one will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eddie wrote:
Laurent Montel wrote:
Why ?
Do you know libification ?
Yes, I think Texstar has a handle on KDE!
I guess Texstar also adds features and does bug fixes in KDE CVS?
Anyway, just run rpmlint on Tex's packages, and then on the ones in
Oh I agree on this one.
I don't think splitting KDE was such a good idea and I suspect it will
com back to bite mandrake.
Keep It simple!
-randy
And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
rpms just doesnt make sense.
Why ?
Why split it
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:11 am, eddie wrote:
And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
rpms just doesnt make sense.
Why ?
Do you know libification ?
Regards.
Yes, I think Texstar has a handle on KDE!
Sometimes things make sense and sometimes
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 05:38, Brad Felmey wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 03:19, Warly wrote:
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
The same thing wrong with them all - too little QA/freeze, although
this is somewhat better now.
Also ludicrous changelogs like fixed something or
On Monday 29 September 2003 23:14, Vincent Danen wrote:
c On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 10:50:48PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
while browsing the web, i have seen that gentoo and netbsd announce
their new developpers. this may be a good idea,in order to show
Le Mardi 30 Septembre 2003 17:31, Texstar a écrit :
Oh I agree on this one.
I don't think splitting KDE was such a good idea and I suspect it
will com back to bite mandrake.
Keep It simple!
-randy
And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4
On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 01:48:44PM +0200, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
Cool. Something to play with in future :) . As said before, I can't
really afford to work on/with cooker, this way might be a lot better
solution for me to contribute to Mandrake
Good
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:22 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eddie wrote:
Laurent Montel wrote:
Why ?
Do you know libification ?
Yes, I think Texstar has a handle on KDE!
I guess Texstar also adds features and does bug fixes in KDE CVS?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Texstar wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:22 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
eddie wrote:
Laurent Montel wrote:
Why ?
Do you know libification ?
Yes, I think Texstar has a handle on KDE!
I guess Texstar also adds features and does bug fixes in KDE
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 11:01 am, you wrote:
Le Mardi 30 Septembre 2003 17:31, Texstar a écrit :
Oh I agree on this one.
I don't think splitting KDE was such a good idea and I suspect it
will com back to bite mandrake.
Keep It simple!
-randy
Yes, I think Texstar has a handle on KDE!
I guess Texstar also adds features and does bug fixes in KDE CVS?
What does this have to do with the way code is packaged?
Nothing, but neither does the previous statement (which is what I was
actually hinting at ...).
Regards,
Buchan
Good
On Sunday 28 September 2003 04:19 am, Warly wrote:
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
[worksforme]
I hate it when people close bugs w/ works for me instead
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 19:08, jokerman64 wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2003 04:19 am, Warly wrote:
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these
days to have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 02:09 pm, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 19:08, jokerman64 wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2003 04:19 am, Warly wrote:
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these
days to have some brainstorm.
May you give your
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:38:15PM -0500, Brad Felmey wrote:
For God's sake, a urpmi proxy, like apt-proxy. Corporations are not
going to want each box pulling packages separately, and they don't want
to mirror, either. They just want to pull the stuff they need - once.
I don't know if God
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:46, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 05:38, Brad Felmey wrote:
Also, a place where folks can go get urpmi lines. Not just for stuff
like MdkClub and mirrors, but kind of like Debian has a list of misc.
repositories available that make it easy to
On Sun Sep 28 2003 at 18:30, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
| On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Warly wrote:
| - What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
|
| I think the targets for a release should be set much earlier in the
| process. Especially targets for nr of major bugs in the software to
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:44, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2003 04:19, Warly wrote:
- What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development.
Use the commonly held definitions of beta and rc for labeling
releases. Too often, rc's are still full of major bugs, including
with the
Le dim 28/09/2003 à 13:48, Nora Etukudo a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Warly wrote:
- Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs?
No. I don't need ISO's at all during development. 'rsync'ing to a local
server and installing via net from there is cheap, fast and reliable.
, 28 2003, 21:49,Austin:
On 09/28/2003 06:26:43 PM, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
, 28 2003, 21:44,Michael
Scherer:
* use also apt-get (with the same repositories, IMHO this can be
done no?), let the user which app use to install rpms.
IMHO it just wastes mirror space
Le dim 28/09/2003 à 19:44, Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
One thing I saw which could enhance the availablilty of Mandrake was to
make an alliance with a major disk vendor, eg. Maxtor, to preinstalle
mandrake on a number of disks - free of charge. I think this is what
Lindows have done with
Le dim 28/09/2003 à 17:47, lamikr_mdk a écrit :
Warly wrote:
CD Burner
- Why everybody owning CD burner must go manually to edit kernel booting
parameters to add lines like hdc=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi. Either add
this as a default for every cd device or help to make cd burning
softwares to
Warly wrote:
- We though a bit late in the 9.2 developement process to split cooker
ml, we
should do it now.
- What could we do, as a community, to increase the acceptance of
mandrakelinux?
Boxes on the store shelves, and included at least as an option with far
more new PC's.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:35, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
You don't know where the disk will be installed, and so if you don't
support well the hardware you will just panic ... Bad reputation for
linux.
This kind of alliance should be made with computers suppliers ( HP,
Dell, IBM, Acer, Shuttle ) or
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:42:05 +0300
Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* patch wine to be able to use mono's winforms
Suply the patch and I am sure someone can take a look.
the patch is found here:
http://openlinksw.com/mono/index.html
read also:
http://go-mono.com/winforms.html
Le dim 28/09/2003 à 19:44, Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
One thing I saw which could enhance the availablilty of Mandrake was to
make an alliance with a major disk vendor, eg. Maxtor, to preinstalle
mandrake on a number of disks - free of charge. I think this is what
Lindows have done with
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and it
is ridiculous and too confusing. Some one will say that you can install
what you want and leave out other stuff, but if you use urpmi and/or
gurpmi it still installs all the packages as before because of
dependencies. Please
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 23:46, Robert L martin wrote:
2 not if you have sub megabit access ON THE MACHINE YOU ARE UPGRADING
A network install of a typical setup actually involves less downloading
than getting three ISOs. My typical installation size is around 1GB, so
running an installation over
On Monday 29 September 2003 00:26, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
, 28 2003, 21:44,Michael
Scherer:
* use also apt-get (with the same repositories, IMHO this can
be done no?), let the user which app use to install rpms.
IMHO it just wastes mirror space ... how many use apt?
it
On Monday 29 September 2003 13:38, Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and
it is ridiculous and too confusing.
debian does it, suse too.
Some one will say that you can
install what you want and leave out other stuff, but if you use urpmi
and/or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Le dim 28/09/2003 à 19:44, Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
One thing I saw which could enhance the availablilty of Mandrake was to
make an alliance with a major disk vendor, eg. Maxtor, to preinstalle
mandrake on a number of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scherer wrote:
On Monday 29 September 2003 13:38, Eddie wrote:
Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and
it is ridiculous and too confusing.
debian does it, suse too.
Some one will say that you can
install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne a écrit :
| And why do I in a corporate network, with no modem attached, need to
| install a setuid binary (pppd) just to install kmail (which used to
| install kppp also, which requires ppp).
|
| Sorry, but this is a good move that has
Le Lundi 29 Septembre 2003 14:20, Lea Gris a écrit :
Buchan Milne a écrit :
| And why do I in a corporate network, with no modem attached, need to
| install a setuid binary (pppd) just to install kmail (which used to
| install kppp also, which requires ppp).
|
| Sorry, but this is a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lea Gris wrote:
Buchan Milne a écrit :
| And why do I in a corporate network, with no modem attached, need to
| install a setuid binary (pppd) just to install kmail (which used to
| install kppp also, which requires ppp).
|
| Sorry, but this is
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
One good way would be to provides printserver on all printing apps (cups, lpr,
lprng...) and samba requires it.
They already provide lpddaemon.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stew]$ urpmf --provides lpddaemon
cups:lpddaemon
LPRng:lpddaemon
lpr has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Lundi 29 Septembre 2003 14:20, Lea Gris a écrit :
Buchan Milne a écrit :
| And why do I in a corporate network, with no modem attached, need to
| install a setuid binary (pppd) just to install kmail (which used to
| install
Le Dimanche 28 Septembre 2003 10:19, Warly a écrit :
- What could we do, as a community, to increase the acceptance of
mandrakelinux?
Download is very well for people having a fast link.
But people having a slow 56k link have few reasons to subscribe to the club.
My proposition is to ask
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:55, Buchan Milne wrote:
This has no bearing on the matter, since we build against libcups. If
we didn't, you wouldn't require any printing-related software
installed.
If libcups2 isn't exclusive of any of the other printing systems, is it
such a big problem to install
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 12:07:47AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
A bugzilla (or similar product) for the release version? Seems strange
I know but if you hook people on the concept as users with a smaller bug
number (hopefully) in a release version you
On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 04:41:35PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
# drakbug
(I don't know how much this will be advertised and if it is all working
and tested ... but note that bugs will probably treated more harshly than
in bugzilla - where reporters
On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 02:36:41PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
[...]
- How to have more contributors?
A bugzilla (or similar product) for the release version? Seems strange
I know but if you hook people on the concept as users with a smaller bug
number (hopefully) in a release version
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:21:01PM -0400, jokerman64 wrote:
but if updates worked better you'd probably do them wouldn't you?
No, never. ;-)
I hate operating system updates since the early eighties from the last
millenium (ALTOS XENIX 2.5, 1982).
Liebe Grüße, Nora.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote:
Not all of us have high bandwith connection. I test cooker at home, but
i can download easily at work : i can download an iso with only rpms
modified at work, and use them as 'update' home to test the improvements
Oh no, you
On Monday 29 September 2003 11:40 am, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 02:36:41PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
[...]
- How to have more contributors?
A bugzilla (or similar product) for the release version? Seems strange
I know but if you hook people on the concept as
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
Enhancement requests should be handled first and all defects from previous
releases fixed or closed.
- We though a bit late in the 9.2 development process to split cooker ml,
we should do it now.
I agree. I am interested in printing and laptop
- What should we do to improve the Wiki.
Create test plans or just simple requests for outside testers when a major
feature is added or package updated...
On Sunday 28 September 2003 10:19, Warly wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
while browsing the web, i have seen that gentoo and netbsd announce
their new developpers. this may be a good idea,in order to show that
new contributers comes.
And, even if this sound a little childish, having
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 10:50:48PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
while browsing the web, i have seen that gentoo and netbsd announce
their new developpers. this may be a good idea,in order to show that
new contributers comes.
And, even if this sound a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
- What could we do, as a community, to increase the acceptance of
mandrakelinux?
Target the corporate desktop/client market.
- And anything related to the mandrakelinux distro.
Include no brainer tools/wizards for creating
On Monday 29 September 2003 01:50 pm, Nora Etukudo wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:21:01PM -0400, jokerman64 wrote:
but if updates worked better you'd probably do them wouldn't you?
No, never. ;-)
I hate operating system updates since the early eighties from the last
millenium (ALTOS
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 10:50:48PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
while browsing the web, i have seen that gentoo and netbsd announce
their new developpers. this may be a good idea,in order to show that
new
Le Dimanche 28 Septembre 2003 10:19, Warly a écrit :
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
in my opinion:
---
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- We though a bit late in the 9.2
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 11:37:22PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
This is what @linux-mandrake.com addresses are for.
But again, there is no documented policy (and maybe even the resitrictions
on what you should use it for) anywhere, so people don't know how to get
one.
Hasn't it always been
Le Lundi 29 Septembre 2003 15:11, Pierre Jarillon a écrit :
My proposition is to ask people if they want to help or some help or
nothing. - allow to query the database to find people living in the same
area. - create a mailing list for each area. Only club members of the same
area can access
On Sunday 28 September 2003 9:05 am, Pierre Jarillon honored me with this
communique:
Le Dimanche 28 Septembre 2003 13:48, Nora Etukudo a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Warly wrote:
- Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs?
No. I don't need ISO's at all during
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 03:19, Warly wrote:
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
The same thing wrong with them all - too little QA/freeze, although this
is somewhat better now.
Also ludicrous changelogs like fixed something or rebuild. Laurent
is the worst about this. Fixed *WHAT*?
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:50, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2003 10:19, Warly wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
And, even if this sound a little childish, having a
@contributer.mandrake.org mail address for contributer could do some
subliminal advertisement, showing that
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- We though a bit late in the 9.2 developement process to split cooker ml, we
should do it now.
- What could we do to
Warly wrote:
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
Well maybe a bit too many problems with mirrors. And the mirror list
could be improved a bit (new looks, new mirrors added, old ones removed)
And it would be nice to get beta testers start testing earlier and not
too late when the
This is my first day and the first post in this list :)
- What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development.
I believe that in this actual GNU/Linux distros market, like any other market,
only those with exclusive or catching features may get popular and eventually
successful. MandrakeClub is
Hi!
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:19:44 +0200
Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May you give your opinion on :
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development.
- mdk seems to develop/change their own tools (Drak* - with the
exception of urpmi and
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Warly wrote:
- Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs?
No. I don't need ISO's at all during development. 'rsync'ing to a local
server and installing via net from there is cheap, fast and reliable.
I would like to see more focus on Mandrake AutoInstall.
What about a metadistro with a cdrom (in the future a dvdrom) runing
Mandrake from the cd-driver? similar to Knoppix but with all the Mandrake
goodies.
Lot of people has started to use linux after a successfull Knoppix/Gnome-live
cd experience.
Regards
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
Am Sonntag, 28. September 2003 10:19 schrieb Warly:
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days
to have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- the mirror situation
- the mailinglists were eating mails (on all
On Sunday 28 September 2003 13:17, Michael Reinsch wrote:
Hi!
- some packages have a maintainer who is not really the maintainer of
this package (i.e. most changes are done by someone else), so a bug
report isn't assigned to the correct person.
we all receive bugreport for all packages, but,
Hi!
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:22:14 +0200
Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- How to have more contributors?
Decreasing time consumption and power needed to participate. It was
sometimes like fighting against windmills to get heared on the cooker
list. Splitting up the lists could
Le Dimanche 28 Septembre 2003 13:48, Nora Etukudo a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Warly wrote:
- Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs?
No. I don't need ISO's at all during development. 'rsync'ing to a local
server and installing via net from there is cheap, fast and
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- We though a bit late in the 9.2 developement process to split cooker ml, we
should do it now.
- What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development.
- What should we do to improve the Wiki.
- Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs?
- What could we do,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Warly wrote:
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
I think the targets for a release should be set much earlier in the process.
Especially targets for nr of major bugs in the software to be released.
Focus more on a small set of features that
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
