On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:23:36 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>
> Your friend Zen saw "artistic beauty" when a nuclear bomb killed
> great part of Tanaka family, who still lived in Hiroshima.
So I did your homework and here's the message :
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cyphe
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:10:35 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2016 2:51 PM, "juan" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:23:36 -0200
> > Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Your friend Zen saw "artistic beauty" when a nuclear bomb killed
> > > great part of Tanaka family, who still live
On Oct 19, 2016 2:51 PM, "juan" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:23:36 -0200
> Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>
>
> > Your friend Zen saw "artistic beauty" when a nuclear bomb killed
> > great part of Tanaka family, who still lived in Hiroshima. ]
>
>
> Do you mind providing the source for that c
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:23:36 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> Your friend Zen saw "artistic beauty" when a nuclear bomb killed
> great part of Tanaka family, who still lived in Hiroshima. ]
Do you mind providing the source for that claim?
On Oct 19, 2016 2:18 AM, "Александр" wrote:
>
>johny new-man (dick-man) took it as the ONLY and the MAJOR hook
he's got on Zen and now he bites him with it every Monday and Saturday.
John, do you "bite" Zenaan only at Mondays and Saturdays? Do you want to
take turns? So you can rest and cho
Alex - stick to the smaller "+100" style posts for your comrades. You aren't
doing them any favors with these longer tirades.
You really come off as a disgusting sort of sycophant...or should I say,
zenophant :). Just making fun of your moronic word play, though I understand
English isn't your
Aff.
Original Message
On Oct 18, 2016, 10:17 PM, Александр wrote:
2016-10-19 2:41 GMT+03:00 John Newman :
Are you also a holocaust denier like your friend Zen?
Oh, johny, johny... poor johny... you fought Juan and you totally lost, so now
you came back to bite Z
2016-10-19 2:41 GMT+03:00 John Newman :
> Are you also a holocaust denier like your friend Zen?
Oh, johny, johny... poor johny... you fought Juan and you totally lost, so
now you came back to bite Zen you hate Zenaan and the Truth he spreads
so much that you must bite him again and again and
On Oct 18, 2016 10:30 PM, "juan" wrote:
>
> For completeness' sake. You are even more 'hard headed' than I
am, and your positions are standard establishment positions that you can't
even start to defend.
Yes, I am mch more hard headed than you. I never said I was not,
hihi... ;)
>
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:28:06 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2016 3:57 PM, "juan" wrote:
> >
> > So, having 'faith' in technology doesn't make sense.
>
> Faith in people, faith in science, faith in technology, my dear Juan.
> Always hoping the people can create better technolog
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:40:40 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> I will tell you a secret: - when Juan is not being annoying and
> aggressive, he is a very dear person, but extremely hard headed.
For completeness' sake. You are even more 'hard headed' than I
am, and your positions ar
On Oct 18, 2016 3:57 PM, "juan" wrote:
>
> So, having 'faith' in technology doesn't make sense.
Faith in people, faith in science, faith in technology, my dear Juan.
Always hoping the people can create better technologies, more precise
methods and systems and use them for saving lives, fo
On Oct 18, 2016 8:41 PM, "John Newman" wrote:
>
>
> Do you actually know anything about the autistic spectrum? I ask because
my former girlfriends job was working with disabled children. She regularly
worked with girls in their teens who couldn't even speak, not a single
word. They were SEVERELY
hi hi me me think you real
Original Message
On Oct 18, 2016, 5:35 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 10/18/2016 06:22 PM, John Newman wrote:
>
>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 8:18 PM, juan wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:01:22 -0400
>> John Newman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Christ,
>>
>> lol...
>>
>>>
On 10/18/2016 06:22 PM, John Newman wrote:
>
>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 8:18 PM, juan wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:01:22 -0400
>> John Newman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Christ,
>>
>>lol...
>>
>>> you're a childish moron. Or, in your parlance, a retard. You
>>> literally do not know what the fuc
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:22:26 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 18, 2016, at 8:18 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:01:22 -0400
> > John Newman wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Christ,
> >
> >lol...
> >
> >> you're a childish moron. Or, in your parlance, a retard. You
> >> liter
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 8:18 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:01:22 -0400
> John Newman wrote:
>
>
>> Christ,
>
>lol...
>
>> you're a childish moron. Or, in your parlance, a retard. You
>> literally do not know what the fuck you're talking about.
>
>
>How does it feel t
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:01:22 -0400
John Newman wrote:
> Christ,
lol...
> you're a childish moron. Or, in your parlance, a retard. You
> literally do not know what the fuck you're talking about.
How does it feel to be a pro censorship piece of shit and now
ps
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:41:31PM -0400, John Newman wrote:
> Are you also a holocaust denier like your friend Zen?
John, so factual today - what's got into you?
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 7:55 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:41:31 -0400
> John Newman wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:48 PM, juan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:29:46 -0200
>>> Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>>>
> On Oct 18, 2016 6:16 PM, "juan" wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:41:31 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:48 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:29:46 -0200
> > Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> >
> >>> On Oct 18, 2016 6:16 PM, "juan" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>And if you are challenged, then it's all 'subjective
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:48 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:29:46 -0200
> Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>
>>> On Oct 18, 2016 6:16 PM, "juan" wrote:
>>>
>>>And if you are challenged, then it's all 'subjective'?
>>> Please.
>>
>> "Challenged"? "Me"? For "you"? Hahahaha!!! ;D
>
On Oct 18, 2016 7:15 PM, "Cecilia Tanaka" wrote:
>
> It isn't cowardy, my love, it's pneumonia. What will save my lungs, my
life, is the Science, the Medicine, not political discussions. :)
It wasn't a polite excuse, Juan. My pneumonia is worst now, after spending
a raining night out, listenin
On Oct 18, 2016 6:40 PM, "juan" wrote:
> >
> > "Challenged"? "Me"? For "you"? Hahahaha!!! ;D
>
> What do you mean "for you"? Perhaps you meant "by you"?
Oh, sorry! Wrong preposition! "By you". Thanks, Juan! :)
> > Really was needing to laugh today, hahaha!!! Wow, my mood is much
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:29:46 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2016 6:16 PM, "juan" wrote:
> >
> > And if you are challenged, then it's all 'subjective'?
> > Please.
>
> "Challenged"? "Me"? For "you"? Hahahaha!!! ;D
What do you mean "for you"? Perhaps you meant "by
On Oct 18, 2016 6:16 PM, "juan" wrote:
>
> And if you are challenged, then it's all 'subjective'? Please.
"Challenged"? "Me"? For "you"? Hahahaha!!! ;D
Really was needing to laugh today, hahaha!!! Wow, my mood is much better
now! Thanks, Juan!!! :D :D :D
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:48:10 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> Well, my dear Juan, one man's constant is another man's variable...
> No offenses, it's purely subjective.
So why do you bother addressing your criminal propaganda
to me? You believe in the 'science' that the psychiatric
Well, my dear Juan, one man's constant is another man's variable... No
offenses, it's purely subjective.
As I said before, in this exact moment, I have no time, no patience and no
health to discuss anything with you.
Take care, kisses! :*
- c.
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 05:57:43 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2016 4:05 PM, "juan" wrote:
> >
> > I say you are an ignorant nerd who thinks that any sort of
> > pseudo
> technical bullshit is Holy Science. You are just a recycled christian.
>
> People > Technology, always. But
On Oct 16, 2016 4:05 PM, "juan" wrote:
>
> I say you are an ignorant nerd who thinks that any sort of pseudo
technical bullshit is Holy Science. You are just a recycled christian.
People > Technology, always. But Science always was my real religion, my
dear Juan. I have real faith that
It's mildly tempting to make a substantive reply to your continued nonsense.
But I said I was bowing out, and so I am ;). None of your rebuttals are worth
the continued effort anyway, Juan. My time is better spent doing ANYTHING else.
I do appreciate the props on my old comments on propaganda
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:18:26 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:13 PM, juan wrote:
> >>
> >> I've never seen you make any interesting technical points,
> >
> > So now you changed from "technical points" to "interesting
> > technical points"
> >
> > You don't ne
> On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:13 PM, juan wrote:
>>
>> I've never seen you make any interesting technical points,
>
> So now you changed from "technical points" to "interesting
> technical points"
>
> You don't need to further embarras yourself, but you are likely
> to….
Pl
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 06:29:42 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 15, 2016, at 3:52 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 23:13:50 -0400
> > John Newman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Its technical discussion that doesn’t interest you, so you call it
> >> "useless talk".
> >
> >It is
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 3:52 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 23:13:50 -0400
> John Newman wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Its technical discussion that doesn’t interest you, so you call it
>> "useless talk".
>
>It is useless talk because it doesn't lead to any improvement,
>security-wise, le
> I don't think I ever said that or agreed to it. I'm not
> interested in *irrelevant* technical discussions. But,
> for instance, I've discussed a few times why a cyberweaponlike
> tor (widely supported in fake, american, privacy circles ) is
> TECHNICALLY flawed - at
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 23:13:50 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> Its technical discussion that doesn’t interest you, so you call it
> "useless talk".
It is useless talk because it doesn't lead to any improvement,
security-wise, let alone increased freedom.
> I think we are agreed on
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:57 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:31:04 -0400
> John Newman wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:13 PM, juan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> global warming is a hoax. Then again, try telling a
>>> jew-kristian that kristianity is a hoax…
>>>
>>
>> Man,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:31:04 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:13 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> >
> > global warming is a hoax. Then again, try telling a
> > jew-kristian that kristianity is a hoax…
> >
>
> Man, I’m not going to debate climate change with you, its a f
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:13 PM, juan wrote:
>
>
> global warming is a hoax. Then again, try telling a
> jew-kristian that kristianity is a hoax…
>
Man, I’m not going to debate climate change with you, its a fucking
stupid waste of time. If you honestly don’t believe in scien
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:46:51 -0400
John Newman wrote:
> What’s your problem with the crypto list?
> Too much technical talk?
> Not enough Russian propaganda?
To be more precise. Expect to find absolutely no russian
propaganda, because that list is fully 'moderated'. That is,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:46:51 -0400
John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:23 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > global warming is a hoax - and as I mentioned before you
> > are not even using the correct scam terminology : global warming
> >
>
>
> Global warming is not a hoax.
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:23 PM, juan wrote:
>
> global warming is a hoax - and as I mentioned before you are not
> even using the correct scam terminology : global warming
>
Global warming is not a hoax.
>> This list is less than useless.
>
> translation : useless for es
On 10/14/2016 06:39 PM, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:50 -0600
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2016 06:10 PM, juan wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600
>>> Mirimir wrote:
>>>
On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
> Mirimir wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:50 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 06:10 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600
> > Mirimir wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
> >>> Mirimir wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
>
> As I said, you'
On 10/14/2016 06:10 PM, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
>>> Mirimir wrote:
>>>
>>>
As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> go kill some of your 'customers' with
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
> > Mirimir wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;)
> >
> >
> > go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin,
> > asshole.
>
> Ye
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
> > Mirimir wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;)
> >
> >
> > go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin,
> > asshole.
>
> Ye
On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>
>>
>> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;)
>
>
> go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin, asshole.
Yes, a fucking hoax who twists shit to support his fraudulent claims.
Taking yo
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:18:16 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 05:02 PM, John Newman wrote:
> > Global warming is not a hoax.
> >
> > This list is less than useless.
>
> Yeah, it died, and then got reanimated by jerks. It's been a classic
> Usenet-style troll takeover. Sad :(
Why
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
>
> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;)
go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin, asshole.
>
> >>
> >
> >
On 10/14/2016 05:02 PM, John Newman wrote:
> Global warming is not a hoax.
>
> This list is less than useless.
Yeah, it died, and then got reanimated by jerks. It's been a classic
Usenet-style troll takeover. Sad :(
> John
>
>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 6:47 PM, juan wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:02:01 -0400
John Newman wrote:
> Global warming is not a hoax.
global warming is a hoax - and as I mentioned before you are not
even using the correct scam terminology : global warming
> This list is less than useless.
translation : useless for
On 10/14/2016 05:05 PM, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:51:33 -0600
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2016 04:47 PM, juan wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400
>>> Steve Kinney wrote:
>>>
Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a
hoax,
>>>
>>> glo
Global warming is not a hoax.
This list is less than useless.
John
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 6:47 PM, juan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400
> Steve Kinney wrote:
>
>> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a
>> hoax,
>
> global warming IS a hoax.
>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:51:33 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 04:47 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400
> > Steve Kinney wrote:
> >
> >> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a
> >> hoax,
> >
> > global warming IS a hoax.
>
> Dude, you're
On 10/14/2016 04:47 PM, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400
> Steve Kinney wrote:
>
>> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a
>> hoax,
>
> global warming IS a hoax.
Dude, you're a hoax!
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400
Steve Kinney wrote:
> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a
> hoax,
global warming IS a hoax.
> also uniformly represent Agenda 21 as a conspiracy to establish
> a One World Government.
I don't know what
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:50:48 +0200
Tom wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:04:34PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > How about reforming the "modern" "democratic" state with direct
> > democracy - Swiss style ?
>
> Doesn't work:
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Schweizer-erlauben-Geheimd
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:04:34PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> How about reforming the "modern" "democratic" state with direct
> democracy - Swiss style ?
Doesn't work:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Schweizer-erlauben-Geheimdienst-umfangreiches-Ueberwachungsarsenal-3331327.html
(germ
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:19:20AM +0300, Александр wrote:
> Thank you very much, Zen!
> This is very inspiring to see politicians like this one. Of course, he is
> still a politician... he is still part of this fucked up system, BUT ...
> there is BUT. And he is this "BUT".
>
> With politicians l
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:06:07PM -0300, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:25:14 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>
> > If you read
> > his speech, you will see that, at least at this early hour (his maiden
> > speech), he is not "a politician"
>
>
> I read enough to find out what h
.
but hope.
2016-10-14 2:50 GMT+03:00 Zenaan Harkness :
> It is rare that any politician gets a standing ovation.
>
> Here is one:
>
>
>Subject: Fwd: RE: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden
> Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube
>
> *WHAT A
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:25:14 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If you read
> his speech, you will see that, at least at this early hour (his maiden
> speech), he is not "a politician"
I read enough to find out what he claims to believe about the
state and economic activities. He'
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 09:25:52PM -0300, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:50:58 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> > It is rare that any politician gets a standing ovation.
>
> He's a politician. A murderous thief at best,
This is the first time this man has ever been in parliament.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:50:58 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> It is rare that any politician gets a standing ovation.
He's a politician. A murderous thief at best, and should be
dealt with accordingly. And a quick look at that rant shows
that he wants the agricultural mafi
66 matches
Mail list logo
