Hi All,
Yes, I'm Aware of that Apache RSL's are not signed. But, one of our product
have 1 main application, 8 sub modules, 9 * 1 style module and 9 * 5
resource modules. user may visit any module at any time in any locale. and
our client want to support more locale and wanted to have more
Hi,
When I tried downloading the SDK by [RC] Installer 3 ((have configured the
download cache option)), due to MD5 mismatch installation was aborted. The
problem/feedback's I noticed here are,
- there is no option to retry, I have to close the app. and restart it.
- even after I restart
On 21/03/14 19:19, Alex Harui wrote:
folks to try. Yes, the changes above might have backward compatibility
impact on folks using these first releases, but IMO, if we set expectation
correctly, folks will be flexible.
Release early, release often would be my suggestion.
Package or XMLNS
I could look into it, but it wouldn't be my highest priority.
Thanks Alex,
I have raised a JIRA ticket, for future reference:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34183
Do you think I can start working on it when I have time, maybe on a simpler
implementation, of better to wait for
Hi,
if there are plans to introduce TLF on mobile TextInput this will change my
priorities about change the internals of MaskedTextInput component and will
only make it to preserve slot positions.
IMO, if now TLF give us a good performance in mobile this days it will be
very useful to make it
Hi guys (Back from my skiing Holiday ;-))
Thanks for the kind words :-)
Really looking forward to reanimating some parts called dead (BlazeDS) and
helping giving birth to some new parts (FlexJS).
Think we'll really be doing some kick-ass stuff in the near future ;-)
Chris
Congrats from me too :-)
Von: Kessler CTR Mark J mark.kessler@usmc.mil
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2014 11:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Carlos as the newest PMC member
Congratulations!
-Mark
-Original Message-
When migrating the Flexmojos Issues from Sonatype to the new Atlassian Jira, I
wrote a Manual Migration tool that also transfered attachments using the REST
api
If there is some stuff missing, we could code a similar tool to Transfer
missing attachments.
Chris
Hi Carlos,
1) It's not proven yet that TLF is fast enough on mobile, especially when
there are lots of text to display, such as in lists of datagrid.
Plus I have discovered that the old TextField is actually capable to display
RTL , but the Flex positioning is broken, so the text does not
Oh, I missed your answer. (I don't know why, but many of your e-mails were
automatically marked as junk in my mail program. Maybe, you are sending too
much e-mails. ;-) )
Ok, it would be nice to have the attachments for the bugs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-22758
Essentially, every attachment is missing. When Infra did the import of
the Flex issues, they had the attachments, but assumed that they could add
the attachments after import (which worked in prior versions of JIRA) and
then found out that wasn't true in the current version.
There is about 7GB
BTW, was one of the enhancements automated test generation? Maybe from
metadata on the class?
There was a bigger project on that, yes, although we didn't get particularly
far before the Apache switch so most of it was put on hold. Also, Flash Builder
would create stubs for you based on the
I'd like Labriola to verify that DP should be in the NOTICE and whether anyone
else like Adobe should also be in there.
I will make time to review but may have some questions as I feel a bit
mal-informed on procedure on these fronts.
Members of Adobe Consulting did write and donate the
OK, added attachments. There doesn't seem to be source for FLEX-20272
From: Marcus Fritze
marcus.fri...@googlemail.commailto:marcus.fri...@googlemail.com
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.orgmailto:dev@flex.apache.org
dev@flex.apache.orgmailto:dev@flex.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 24, 2014 4:56 AM
Thanks for the explanation.
Is it possible to download the 7GB and the XML to search manually?
And maybe - if it's not to complicated - to write that utility.
Thanks
Marcus
Am 24.03.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com:
Essentially, every attachment is missing. When Infra did
It would save me much time if you find a different solution. Looks like
some folks have suggested that we simply have the files indexed by a web
search engine.
-Alex
On 3/24/14 2:38 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
I could look into it, but it wouldn't be my highest
Please file a bug.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/24/14 1:40 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai jaga...@sybrant.com wrote:
Hi,
When I tried downloading the SDK by [RC] Installer 3 ((have configured
the
download cache option)), due to MD5 mismatch installation was aborted. The
problem/feedback's I noticed here
On 3/23/14 11:27 PM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai jaga...@sybrant.com wrote:
Hi All,
Yes, I'm Aware of that Apache RSL's are not signed. But, one of our
product
have 1 main application, 8 sub modules, 9 * 1 style module and 9 * 5
resource modules. user may visit any module at any time in any locale.
Am 24.03.2014 um 17:43 schrieb Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com:
OK, added attachments. There doesn't seem to be source for FLEX-20272
Thank you very much.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Well how about creating a too that uses the REST api to fetch the attachments
from the Adobe JIRA and to save them using their real names in directories
matching the issue ID?
Something like this:
target-dir/
target-dir/FLEX-123
target-dir/FLEX-123/sample.mxml
target-dir/FLEX-123/as-sample.as
On 3/24/14 9:28 AM, Michael A. Labriola labri...@digitalprimates.net
wrote:
I'd like Labriola to verify that DP should be in the NOTICE and whether
anyone else like Adobe should also be in there.
I will make time to review but may have some questions as I feel a bit
mal-informed on procedure
It would save me much time if you find a different solution. Looks like some
folks have suggested that we simply have the files indexed by a web search
engine.
I understand, but that's a different usage.
Adobe ASDOC has both: quick search field on top of the class list, and global
search
On 3/24/14 9:22 AM, Michael A. Labriola labri...@digitalprimates.net
wrote:
BTW, was one of the enhancements automated test generation? Maybe from
metadata on the class?
There was a bigger project on that, yes, although we didn't get
particularly far before the Apache switch so most of it was
On 3/24/14 9:26 AM, Michael A. Labriola labri...@digitalprimates.net
wrote:
OK, I didn't see any non-Flex apps around the runners. The deal is the
mx and Spark apps can't wrap the runners and load in FlexJS classes at
the same time. I think I'll just have to replace the Spark app with a
Alex,
I'm trying to keep up with developments, and I'll jump in when I have a few
cycles, hopefully in the next few days.
EdB
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I just checked in changes to flex-falcon and flex-asjs so that the
checkintests
1) Do some package reorganization: Currently most components are in
org.apache.flex.html.staticControls. However these controls aren't quite
so static, so I'm thinking of removing the staticControls folder and
flattening the hierarchy by one level.
All for it. Be sure to freeze the tree
XML file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rhnonjo9p09krws/FlexSDKENTDMV.zip
Attachments: https://www.dropbox.com/s/c0b2h93rbjqwcdz/FlexAttachments.zip
The XML file format is not well documented, but I eventually figured it
out. Tags reference other tags and eventually map the file name to the
FlexJS will keep metadata on the JS side, probably as simple properties on the
classes and/or functions. I imagine we'll write a library that abstracts the
fetching of metadata and returns it as an array of strings or maybe as JSON.
If we could easily retrofit the metadata fetching in
BTW, a key motivating factor in creating a set of FlexUnit tests is to try to
conform to that government standard you told me about. Do you have a 5
sentence summary of what a test suite needs to cover? Is it measured purely
by code coverage or do you have to have boundary tests, negative
ApacheCon required that we upload our slide decks by today. I just posted
my slides. If you have time, please take a look and let me know if you
think I should make changes. The FlexJS session is essentially the same
as the 360|Stack presentation from last year.
What's Happening in the Apache
I would like to see mention of all the activities around Flex Mobile:
- New components/features (Mobile Grid, Scrollable text)
- iOS7 status bar support
- Support for low res (120DPI) and hi-res (480, 640 DPI) devices
- CSS-Media queries for OS version
- CSS-Media queries for device dimensions
-
Looks good @Alex.
I just hope that the full session, including the apps on your demo for
both sessions would be available to everyone after the event.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
bigosma...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see mention of all the activities around Flex
For FlexJS, it would be nice if you can use the beads/strands diagrams from
here [1]
They do a good job of explaining the concepts visually.
Thanks,
Om
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Creating+Components
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
Flex.pdf
Page 6: Eclipse-based IDE = not only (IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc..)
Overall, the impression it gave me is that it's not describing what's
happening in Apache Flex Project, but rather an advertisement to attract new
developers by telling them
Hey, there is not only AS in Flex, there are
On 3/24/14 1:30 PM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
Flex.pdf
Page 6: Eclipse-based IDE = not only (IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc..)
Overall, the impression it gave me is that it's not describing what's
happening in Apache Flex Project, but rather an advertisement to attract
new
+1 for the mobile improvements
-Message d'origine-
De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
Muppirala
Envoyé : lundi 24 mars 2014 21:13
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ApacheCon Slides
I would like to see mention of all the activities around Flex
I just did a quick test to compare TLF and TextField on mobile.
Basically, replaced StyleableTextField cell renderer on MobileGrid by spark
Label-based renderer.
Test results:
- iPad 3 (retina)
- slow iOS packaging , GPU rendering
- Mobile grid with 4 columns of text, and 200 rows
Thanks for the feedback. That diagram is a bit lower-level than I was
going to go, but I'm interested to hear why that's an important piece for
folks attending a 45 minute session. I do have another diagram from my
360|Stack slides that tries to show the class substitution done by the
compiler
I assume this was a release version and not a debug version?
Either way, I don't think TLF will get out to 25fps. I'd suggest doing a
simple test to see if TextField really can do RTL (text starting from the
right edge) or just knows how to place characters in a string based on
some positioning
Hi,
In a work-for-hire model, it isn't really a donation, and the hiring party
generally owns the code unless there is an agreement that says otherwise.
Assuming this is the case Alex can you get Adobe to officially donate it?
However this may not be an issue as FlexUnit (and I assume this
Hi Guys,
I just uploaded my stuf a few minutes ago:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Building%20Enterprise%20Level%20Applications%20with%20Apache%20Flex%20and%20Java-v9-20140313_1547.pdf
(Noticed too late that I should have shortended the file name ;-))
I thought I'd
No, it isn't about being ashamed. Given the kinds of people I met at the one
ApacheCon I went to, I biased this presentation towards folks who don't know
Flex, AS, MXML, and Flash.
Ok, so it's on purpose.
Hmm. I think the whole point of FlexJS is to create a framework that runs
without
Hi,
Hmm. I think the whole point of FlexJS is to create a framework that runs
without Flash and a key factor is the impact from decisions and statements
made by Jobs and Adobe. Are you saying that enough time has passed that
these decisions and statements are no longer a factor?
IMO
On 3/24/14 2:02 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
In a work-for-hire model, it isn't really a donation, and the hiring
party
generally owns the code unless there is an agreement that says
otherwise.
Assuming this is the case Alex can you get Adobe to officially donate
Interesting. Two replies with different view points. I have another
factor that occurred to me. I think we should try to get a release out
ASAP so that folks can have a chance to look at it and get interested and
consider a last minute signup for 360|Flex (assuming there are still
spots).
That
I assume this was a release version and not a debug version?
Damn, I fell in the trap again. Thanks for reminding me.
I have re-done the tests with release packaging, almost same results:
21- 25 FPS for TextField
1 ~ 4 for spark Label.
Either way, I don't think TLF will get out to 25fps.
Yes,
Hi,
I will probably have to find time for that (and the FlexUnit1 code as
well).
While having FlexUnit1 would removed a dependancy it's not a potential blocker
to releasing FlexUnit as this may be.
Do we know who even worked on this at Adobe?
The issue is that there code is in our repo
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. That diagram is a bit lower-level than I was
going to go, but I'm interested to hear why that's an important piece for
folks attending a 45 minute session. I do have another diagram from my
Hi,
Are we talking about a single file here?
https://github.com/apache/flex-flexunit/blob/master/FlexUnit4Test/src/UIRunner.mxml
If so I think that can be rewritten easily enough.
Justin
On 3/24/14 3:21 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. That diagram is a bit lower-level than I was
going to go, but I'm interested to hear why that's an important piece
for
folks
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Maurice Amsellem
maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
No, it isn't about being ashamed. Given the kinds of people I met at the
one ApacheCon I went to, I biased this presentation towards folks who don't
know Flex, AS, MXML, and Flash.
Ok, so it's on purpose.
Are we talking about a single file here?
https://github.com/apache/flex-flexunit/blob/master/FlexUnit4Test/src/UIRunner.mxml
No, we are talking about the code in the tag below:
Adobe:TestRunnerBase /
Which resides here:
https://github.com/apache/flex-flexunit/tree/master/FlexUnit4UIListener
The only negative it has is that it does not run on iOS and Android browsers.
That's true, but subtle.
And once again, we need to be careful about the possible confusion.
When you say Flash/AIR does not run on iOS and Android browsers, some (many?)
people understand Flex does not run on iOS
Hi,
It was originally written (at least primarily) by Alex Uhlmann for FlexUnit
.9. Here is a reference to one of the classes in the original form in github:
https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit/blob/master/FlexUnit4UIListener/src/org/flexunit/flexui/data/AbstractRowData.as
Which IMO mean
Hi,
I just uploaded my stuf a few minutes ago:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Building%20Enterprise%20Level%20Applications%20with%20Apache%20Flex%20and%20Java-v9-20140313_1547.pdf
Lots of info + liking the positive tone you have going there :-)
You may want to
I am, of course, not a lawyer, nor an expert on these matter.
IMO, the key question is whether any Adobe employee wrote any code that
got donated to Apache that is not available on Open@Adobe. A secondary
question is whether any code that is on Open@Adobe that has an Adobe
copyright can be in
Chris, a couple of points:
1. You seem to switch between the terms 'Flex SDK' and 'FDK' midpoint in
the presentation. I think we should all be consistently using the term
'Flex SDK'.
2. The numbers on slide 32 is a outdated. We have more than 40,000
installs of the Flex SDK since we started
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Maurice Amsellem
maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
The only negative it has is that it does not run on iOS and Android
browsers.
That's true, but subtle.
And once again, we need to be careful about the possible confusion.
When you say Flash/AIR does not
Hi,
All of the FlexUnit code on Open@Adobe appears to be under BSD.
Therefore, two scenarios are ok
1) The code on Open@Adobe is being used without modification
2) The code was modified by DP folks.
As Mike stated the code was modified from FU 0.9 by Digital Primates. Mike can
you reconfirm
2) The code was modified by DP folks.
It was modified significantly as the original code was intended to work with
FlexUnit .9 alone and we modified it to work with both projects.
It is important to verify that the copyright license text is not MPL.
It's a BSD-2 header.
Mike
Hi,
Also I think both slide decks need a little more branding (Apache Flex and ASF
logos) and of course the trademark statement and a link to flex.a.o wouldn't go
astray.
Remember more than just attendees of ApacheCon will see these.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
2. The numbers on slide 32 is a outdated. We have more than 40,000
installs of the Flex SDK since we started keeping track.
BTW where do you get the 40,000 number from. I can only see 30,000 in the
google stats. That only include 4.9 and up are you including 4.8 in that and if
so how
Here is the breakdown till date:
/track-installer.html
11,033
/track-installer.html?version=4.11.0os=windows
10,736
/track-installer.html?version=4.10.0os=windows
8,270
/track-installer.html?version=4.11.0os=mac
3,777
/track-installer.html?version=4.10.0os=mac
2,755
Of course, if we add the pre 4.9 numbers, it will be closer to 50,000.
Nick had posted some numbers a while ago. I will see if I can dig that up.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:33 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
bigosma...@gmail.comwrote:
Here is the breakdown till date:
IMO, the Adobe code is a third-party work as defined here:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
The Adobe code would not be a third-party work if there was an agreement
with DP giving DP rights.
But once there are significant modifications, it appears we may need to
consult
Hi,
IMO, the Adobe code is a third-party work as defined here:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
Note that in this case I believe it would fall under:
5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with on a
case-by-case basis by the PMC.
Not this:
4. Minor
On 3/24/14 5:07 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
IMO, the Adobe code is a third-party work as defined here:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
Note that in this case I believe it would fall under:
5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should
67 matches
Mail list logo
