Hi Doug,
Been retired for a while now, but FCC Part 18 applies to ISM products (the I
being Industrial). And being Industrial, Class A emissions would likely apply.
Enjoying the AZ sun. Hope this helps.
Ron Pickard
Sent from my smartphone
On Mar 7, 2022, 10:09 AM, at 10:09 AM, Doug Nix
.
I still kind of miss it as it kept me very busy with long nights, but my head
was truly full of mush at the end & I'm glad I'm out now.
Great friday question (made me reminisce).
Ron Pickard
Sent from my smartphone
On Jun 25, 2021, 10:05 PM, at 10:05 PM, Douglas E Powell
wrote:
ance was with product variations found during factory
inspections due to part availability issues and manufacturer ingenuity (loved
working those variation notices).
Enjoying retirement & best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my smartphone
On Jun 25, 2021, 10:59 AM, at 10:59 AM, Douglas E Powell
wro
contact Ulrich Schmidt directly if interested.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
My name is Ulrich and I’m a Staffing Consultant for Intel. I am sourcing for
the position JR0030496 Internet of Things Product Regulatory Engineer. Please
check the following link for further details: http
A German acquaintance of mine calls them EMC vitamins.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: Bob LaFrance [mailto:b...@creare.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:09 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Ferrite Cores on cables and possible reduction
I
.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Brian Oconnell
oconne...@tamuracorp.com /divdivDate:09/11/2014 1:48 PM (GMT-07:00)
/divdivTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG /divdivSubject: Re: [PSES] weird
stuff in agency agreement form
regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Gary McInturff
gary.mcintu...@esterline.com /divdivDate:08/13/2014 2:25 PM (GMT-07:00)
/divdivTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG /divdivSubject: [PSES] Changes to
verified equipment /divdiv
/divI
Yeah, that's pretty funny. I thought everyone was hibernating.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Scott Douglas
sdoug...@radiusnorth.net /divdivDate:07/10/2014 12:04 AM (GMT-07:00)
/divdivTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Thank you to all that responded. I should've known that that photo was web
linkable.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 10:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Old photo?
If you do
to those interested.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc
is not at all clear on that point). That doesn't seem
practical as most of these eval boards will likely be operated in an
engineering lab type of environment being used by engineers.
Well, that's my 2 cents (2 pence in EU). Comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
, does anyone have an official reference for that ruling? Also, how
widespread is this sort of thing in other countries?
I would like to know of any experiences or knowledge anyone has on this.
Please let me know.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
it.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc
anything like that out there,
commercially available or not.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion
,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Bill Owsley
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:02 PM
To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; 'EMC-PSTC'
Subject: Re: a CAB person and my Python
And some of them are voters too!!!
Tonight at the grocery store, $50 back from
I've followed this thread and am concerned that such an action would constitute
and introduce a significant barrier to trade, which is contrary to the intent
of the scheme of the new approach directives, is it not?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
Original
Edition 2, which
is supposed to be published early next year?
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Richard Nute
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:45 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
Cc: Thomas M Burke
Hi Rich,
Adding one more question to Brian's list.
I know this may be a bit rhetorical, but do you have an idea when the IECEE
will align the CB Scheme to IEC62368 Ed 2, including the TRFs?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
Original message
From: Brian
anyway).
IHTH.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Derby
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:43 AM
To: 'itl-emc user group'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC IC
Hi Sudhakar,
Yes, but how would you plan to keep that impact hammer in calibration. Note
that the 50mm steel ball essentially maintains its calibration unless it is
damaged.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org
that your iPhone 5 will likely use any of the above frequency bands
depending on your wireless connection quality at any given time. IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Derek Walton
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 5:16 PM
To: Larry
test report.
Regarding Korea, I will have to bow to others more experienced with the new
KCC requirements.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of McInturff,
Gary
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 6:26 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
of an experienced
independent regulatory consultant, please let me know that, too. It will be
much appreciated as well.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
mailto:rpick...@rpqconsulting.com rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
http://www.rpqconsulting.com/ www.rpqconsulting.com
Hi Ilan,
Please check again as it is showing now. They may have updated it just after
your email was sent.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 1:42 AM
To: oconne
Well, it had to happen I suppose. FYI.
On 23-Nov, the EU OJ published the first harmonized standards list for the new
RoHS Directive, 2011/65/EU. It can be found at
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:363:0006:0007:EN:PDF.
There is only the following standard in
Hi Joe,
I agree that an Ethernet circuit would be considered to be an SELV circuit and
that would be true if the POE circuit were completely on premise generally,
which would categorize this as a Class III product according to IEC/UL 60950-1
2nd Ed. given that the external power supply is a
|
Regulatory Compliance Engineering
From:
Ron Pickard rpick...@equinoxpayments.commailto:rpick...@equinoxpayments.com
To:
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG,
Date:
11/26/2012 12:38 PM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] POE creepage clearances
Hi
Hi Tom,
That symbol is a China RoHS marking found in document SJ/T11364-2006 issued by
the MII where the specifications for that symbol are given. This symbol's
intent is to indicate a product to be environmentally friendly.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Tom Smith
Actually, I think exercition may be a French word as I seem to recall seeing it
used in French text a few years ago, but I may be mistaken and probably am. Not
sure about exercision, but it may have a similar meaning as exercition, but yet
in another language. Or, is Gert actually testing us?
To all,
FYI. Revised harmonized standards lists for the EMC and RTTE directives were
just published today in the OJ. Here's the link:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:321:SOM:EN:HTML
Best regards,
Ron
-
This
Brian,
Further to Mark's reply, please note that compliance to the recast RoHS
Directive is to be indicated in a product's DofC (Article 13) and CE marking
(Article 16).
IMHO, a CE marked product itself must adhere to the requirements of any EU
directives that are applicable to it including
in the
USA or in the UK. Please advise.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: Ron Pickard RPQ [mailto:rpick...@rpqconsulting.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 5:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: EN 1300 accredited test labs?
Hello,
This may
,
Ron Pickard
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable
FYI, in today's OJ, a new LVD harmonized standards
listhttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:245:SOM:EN:HTML was
posted.
Best regards,
Ron
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
To all,
FYI. The EU's recast WEEE Directive (2012/19/EU) was published in the OJ on
24-Jul. The link to it is
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:197:0038:0071:EN:PDF.
Best regards,
Ron
-
This
Hi Scott,
As for this and the RoHS directives being a matching pair and from a cursory
review, it appears that these two directives are now autonomous.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:29 AM
To: Ron Pickard; EMC-PSTC (EMC-PSTC
Hi Scott,
That's not always the case. I've had experience with auto-ranging 120/240V
products where no voltage selector switch was needed.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Aldous, Scott [mailto:scott.ald...@aei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:59 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re:
I believe you are reading that correctly as EU directive 2006/66/EC pertains to
batteries and accumulators, which is a RoHS-like directive that has its own
marking requirement.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, June
Hi Mark,
I believe you understand the crux of it and I don't believe you are missing
anything according to your questions. When the RTTE directive was published,
it made very little sense to me as to why there were no harmonized TTE
standards associated with the RTTE directive, which was a
Hi Gary,
Ted brought up a good point that for me has proven in a past life for a fairly
benign EMC-passing product to produce a surprising comb generator effect that
created a few headaches to deal with. Also, the EU's harmonized standards lists
are regularly updated to indicate new/revised
Hi Lauren,
I have no experience with that site.
Exceptionally good buys there to be sure, but I would also the legality of it.
Also intriguing at the bottom of the webpage is the claim that it is Powered
by American National Standards Institute with a hyperlink to http://ansi.org.
Still,
Hi Richard,
Due to bandwidth issues, I can only point you to the GCC Standardization
Organizationhttp://www.gso.org.sa/ (GSO), which is a Middle Eastern product
safety approval scheme with technical regulations and product marking
requirements. You'll have to investigate if these requirements
Hi Moshe,
That would likely be IEEE 1725, which is a CTIA/PTCRB requirement for mobile
cellular type phones.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Blackberry
From: Moshe Henig [mailto:moshe.he...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:59 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC
Hi Brian,
I find the claim of those senior design engineers suspect, which in my opinion
appears to be self-serving. And, referring to compliance people in that way
reminds me that the rift between design and compliance still exists, even over
many years. But if, in fact, those compliance
Hi Brian,
I have to repeat Rich's sentiment below, Good luck. Hopefully, he/she will
have had some positive compliance exposure before the breaking in.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Oconnell
Sent: Thursday,
To all,
The key rests with the requirements of the EMC Directive and in its guidance
document in that if this device could be considered as a finished assembly
(apparatus) or not and if it is intended to be put on the market or placed into
service (made available to the end user) or not.
As
Christopher,
As Brian O'Connell said, SAA Certification is not a regulatory requirement.
The external power supply, as Ron Pickard said, would need:
*An electrical safety Certificate of Approval;
*To comply with EMC regulations; and
*To comply Australian MEPS requirements
Hi Christopher,
On the surface of your request, I would have to say no. However, the ACMA's
C-Tick requirements would certainly apply. Also, the external power supply you
mentioned must be compliant with C-Tick and the SAA's RCM requirements along
with being MEPS compliant for energy
German is still at Austest, tell him I said hi.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Martin
Garwood
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:14 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] ACMA labelling
, but there will probably never
be full harmonization as Australia and New Zealand are independent sovereign
states.
I hope this brief reply answered your question.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick
Williams
Sent: Thursday
it?
What will the new label markings look like if C-tick and A-tick are going away?
Is the Supplier Number still applied?
Bob Heller
3M Company
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651-778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
=
From:Ron Pickard RPQ
rpick
Fri, 9
Mar 2012, Ron Pickard RPQ rpick...@rpqconsulting.com writes:
As you can see, there is some harmonization, but there will probably
never be full harmonization as Australia and New Zealand are
independent sovereign states.
Bring back the Empire, I say! Stamp out all this unnecessary
mandatory in 2008, thus superseding the
voluntary Energy Star requirements for EPS. Refer to Section 301 for EPS.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Mcburney,
Ian
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:17 AM
To: emc-p
, March 08, 2012 3:11 PM
To: Ron Pickard; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] ACMA labelling arrangement change announcement
Hi Ron,
Just to clarify, as the announcement says, this is related to labelling and
does not mean any changes to technical requirements.
All importers of overseas
To: 'Kevin Richardson'; Ron Pickard; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] ACMA labelling arrangement change announcement
Many thanks to Ron and Kevin.
Have interpreted the announcement that current products that have a
representative and bear the 'c-tick' mark will not have to be registered
Hi Steve,
The answer to your question resides in ISO 7637-2's title and scope as you've
indicated, which specifically intend to have the tests described therein
applied to road vehicles.
However, I believe the standard you're probably looking for to apply in an
aircraft environment is RTCA
To all,
In addition and especially to those that are not yet aware, please note that
the current RoHS Directive (2002/95/EC) is now in a state of transition to the
recast RoHS Directive
(2011/65/EUhttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:174:0088:0110:EN:PDF),
which will
...@ieee.orgmailto:emc-p...@ieee.org
[mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]mailto:[mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ron
Pickard
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:18 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] RoHS - an EU view
To all,
In addition
Kevin et al,
In my experience over the years, 120-240V indicates a universal input whereby
the power supply is intended to operate at any voltage within that boundary
(with tolerancing of course). And, 120/240V indicates that a power supply is
intended to operate at only those 2 voltages(again
Hi Gary,
I cannot find any 3rd Edition of IEC 61000-4-2 as published or in development
on the IEC website under SC 77B I believe (if anyone knows differently, please
let us know). As such, you might want to validate the 3rd Edition requirement
from your customer.
Also, most regulatory-based
Forwarding from Dave Osborn. Find below some ESD developments associated with
IEC 60601-1-2, 3rd and 4th Editions.
Dave, thanks for that info.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Osborn, Dave [mailto:dave.osb...@philips.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:51 AM
To: Ron Pickard; McInturff, Gary
Subject
From my archives:
I look to the future because that's where I'm going to spend the rest of my
life. - George Burns
'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all
doubt. - Abraham Lincoln
You don't get anything clean without getting something else dirty. - Cecil
Happy New Year to all of you and I hope that this new year finds itself to be
rewarding an prosperous for us all.
And embarking into the new year, I will be looking into ways to improve my
compliance folder and record archival and retrieval system. At this point in
time I do not as yet know if
The IEC has just published the FDIS of IEC 62474 ed1 under its Safety
classification, which is now out for vote until 3-Feb-2012.
From this standard's introduction:
---
The electrotechnical industry tracks and declares specific
I think this one fits nicely.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Blackberry
From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 01:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Scott GRIGGS [mailto:griggs_sc...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:08 AM
To: Ron Pickard; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements for batteries in Mobile Phones
Hi Ron,
Peter M had pointed out that regulatory requirements vary
Hi Charile,
What does typical mean for this battery? Please note that certification
requirements for that battery will vary a bit with the actual device
application and the construction of that battery.
For the USA, please note that UL 1642 pertains mostly to individual battery
cells. UL 2054
Hi Chuck,
Yes UL/CCS has TCB and EU NB status and possibly others. CCS (Compliance
Certification Services) was purchased by UL around the beginning of 2010. NIST
reports their accreditations at http://ts.nist.gov/standards/scopes/2000650.htm.
DISCLAIMER: Information only. This is not a plug for
to “harmonized standards”,
not present in the current directive. Will there be a harmonized standards
list such as is already in place for other various directives? Does anyone at
present know what those harmonized standards will be?
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ
Hi Ed,
It’s nice to hear from you again. See my comments following your questions
below. Let me know if you agree or not or have additional questions. I’m
hoping others will chime in and give their opinions, too. If not, that’s ok,
too.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
this information.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
www.rpqconsulting.com http://www.rpqconsulting.com/
www.linkedin.com/in/RonPickard
From: emc-p
with the PTA get any
updated info. Please note that that market was recently deregulated, but
licenses might still be quite expensive. However, you may know this already.
I’m not sure I answered your question, but IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451
,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
www.rpqconsulting.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Goedderz, Jim
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 5:47 AM
To: emc-p
,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
7372 West Luke Avenue
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
www.rpqconsulting.com http://www.rpqconsulting.com/
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian
O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday
Hi Rich,
You might also want to visit www.ccc-us.com/index.html, which is in English
and provides a lot of useful CCC information.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
7372 West Luke Avenue
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick
Hi Craig,
Your friend will need to look at ETSI EN 300330.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
7372 West Luke Avenue
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
www.rpqconsulting.com
From: emc-p
regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
7372 West Luke Avenue
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
www.rpqconsulting.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
david.cole...@selex-comms.com
Sent
product description to
formulate a sound response.
Comments?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
7372 West Luke Avenue
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
www.rpqconsulting.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
reason. Also, I find any email that has no title, no message and
had an attachment
(identifiable or not) highly suspicious and immediately delete it.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
of any options that might be available until formal CCC approval is
granted.
I look forward to your replies.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http
://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet
insmt-gst.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/h_sf01375e.html
EMCAB:
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet
insmt-gst.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/h_sf06081e.html
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
Hi Gary,
Don't worry too much about it. After all, I've been there and done that, too.
Misinterpretation is
indeed only one of many common human elements, or is that ailments. :-)
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
different skin effect
characteristics. And actually,
the skin effect values from Clayton's book do match with the values I've
obtained here. I'm not at
all sure why you think they are the same.
However, I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
reasons for their
positions. Please advise. (BTW, I'm not trying to be contentious. I'm just
trying to know their
reasoning)
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
Hi John et al,
Why not at 240V? That way the ACA's requirement in Australia is satisfied and
the test voltage is
still within 230V tolerances.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
memories of that stuff.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
pauljsmi...@cs.com
To all,
I'm not sure if this message was received and/or distributed by the listerver,
but here it is again.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
From: tkrze...@genius.org.br [mailto:tkrze...@genius.org.br]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 6:21 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Check list for PCB Layout
Hi everybody,
I would like to create a check list in order to help designers
/tools/clientlists/certs.cfm
Anyone have any others?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
JWiseman@printron
of any?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
rpick...@hypercom.com
,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line
David et al,
I've checked further and found the teldir site has changed to the following:
http://www.infobel.com/teldir/default.asp
Maybe that's why their servers were always busy. Who knows.
Anyway, IHTH you more.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
telephone
company sites. Unfortunately, this site is currently experiencing technical
difficulties, at
present. But, when its working, it does work well.
http://www.teldir.com/eng/
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
evaluated to
either standard.
Comments?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
drcuthb...@micron.com
recognize)
and I'm sure that more have been added since then.
As for the C symbol, I have have no idea. However, let's wait and see if any
of our learned
colleagues might know.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
Bob,
Clause 6.2 of EN 300386 states The artificial network to be used is the one
described in CISPR 16-1
[1], clause 5:
- 0,15 MHz to 30 MHz: (50 ohms // 50 µH).
Also if you wish, you can download this standard for free from ETSI's website.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick
3m.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
owner-emc-pstc@majordo
Hill, ISBN 0-07-134418-7
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
owner-emc-pstc@majordo
members to be aware of such messages and to use caution when presented with
such a message AND to
keep their anti-virus software up-to-date.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
EMC-PSTC Administrator
email: emc-p...@hypercom.com
tel: +602-504-4966
fax: +602-504-4711
to
reduce crosstalk. In general, use a series termination located next to the
output pin. Also, almost
always avoid trace branches for clock traces. Its also important to keep
everything well decoupled.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
