Guy, if by "packaging rules" you mean the recycling of packaging, then I
suggest that you contact Raymond Communications, Inc. publisher of Recycling
Laws International in Riverdale, Maryland, USA.
Tel: (301) 345-1614
Fax: (301) 345-4768
mich...@raymond.com
www.raymond.com/recycle
Ric
the equivalency of an EU Type Examination Certificate.
Was this issue discussed at the Symposium? If so, can someone fill us all in
on the latest info.
Thanks,
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
According to the Basic standards, the criteria in the Generic standard takes
preceident over the criteria in the basic standard, so there really is no
conflict even though they do differ.
> --
> From: Bailin Ma[SMTP:b...@namg.us.anritsu.com]
> Reply To: Bailin Ma
> Sent:
should
be present as an aid to your customers.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Bennett, Neil[SMTP:benne...@genrad.co.uk]
> Reply To: Bennett, Ne
Rich, let me muddy the waters a bit. A power cord assembly requires three,
yes, three approvals. One each for the wire, the plug and the socket. The
HAR marking is just for the wire. An agency mark is required for the plug
and the socket. Also, from somewhere in my dark memory, I recall that the
HA
is about 5 years old, so I would be
interested in knowing if anything has changed.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: WOODS, RICHARD
> Sent:
George, do we really have a choice? What electrical inspector or OSHA
inspector is going to take on the personal responsibility of reviewing reams
of design and test data and pronounce compliance? Yes, they can, but why
should they?
> --
> From: geor...@lexmark.com[SMTP:geor...@lex
Does EN 60601-1-2:1993 cover EMC for implantable medical devices such as
pacemakers?
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send m
Is Argentina using IEC standards, perhaps with national deviations, or are
they using some other standards?
> --
> From: Tetsuya Hashimoto[SMTP:has...@a-pex.co.jp]
> Reply To: Tetsuya Hashimoto
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 10:51 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ie
companies require business to install and use only Listed equipment for the
fire and injury insurance covering that equipment to be valid. Can anyone
verify this?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sen
sed currents of
the three supplies. If you use three 200-240V supplies from phase-to-phase,
you will not have that problem. Again, dito these senarios with a higher
voltage 3-phase system.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessar
w you resolved this
interlock problem. Thanks in advance.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription,
The US Dept of Energy has promoted their "Energy Star" program that
specifies reduced power during non-use. Many areas of the US government now
require their PCs to be compliant.
> --
> From: Arthur Poolton (MEPCD)[SMTP:arth...@apricot.mee.com]
> Reply To: Arthur Poolton (MEPCD
A copy of Resolution 92 can be obtained (in Spanish) in the US from NIST,
(301) 975-4037.
> --
> From: s_doug...@ecrm.com[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
> Reply To: s_doug...@ecrm.com
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 1998 8:58 AM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject:
Try using the free translator at
http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com/cgi-bin/translate?
You will have to cut and paste several paragraphs at at time, and the syntax
of the results will be somewhat strange, but it will give you a feel for
what the documents are saying.
> --
> From:
A search of the IRAM site indicates that they have a certification agreement
with CSA. Would one our readers associated with CSA investigate this
agreement and report back to us?
> --
> From: s_doug...@ecrm.com[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
> Reply To: s_doug...@ecrm.com
> Sent:
obtained Listing for Class 2 devices and electrical inspectors have
never been a problem.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Grant, Tania (Tania)[SM
don't have a contact for a lab, let me know and I
can provide you with one.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Jan Mobers +31 40 273243
equipment.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Spencer,David[SMTP:david_spen...@wb.xerox.com]
> Reply To: Spencer,David
> Sent: Thursday, S
Attached is a document that I received from SABS in South Africa. It
explains the mandatory EMC and Safety requirements that are now in effect
for most equipment.
<>
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent th
NIS 81 is published by UKAS (was NAMAS). The UK contact is
Tel: 081-943 7140
Fax: 081-943 7134
> --
> From: sitar...@kodak.com[SMTP:sitar...@kodak.com]
> Reply To: sitar...@kodak.com
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 1998 9:05 AM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subje
for
floor mounted equipment, so the tests are run in true common mode including
the earth wire. The table top test excludes the earth wire.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic
lieve that your company has a "best in class" system? If so, how is
your company producing, controlling and printing product labels?
Thank you in advance for sharing this information.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessaril
In the US, the best source I have found is the British American Chamber of
Commerce. They will take your charge card order over the phone in $US and
BSI will drop ship the standard to you. Call (415) 296-86445
Mention my name and they will increase the price by 10%.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic
Sorry, the phone number is (415) 296-8645.
> --
> From: WOODS, RICHARD
> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 1998 1:13 PM
> To: 'emc-pstc'
> Subject: RE: EN60950
>
> In the US, the best source I have found is the British American Chamber of
Our chamber is grounded via the electrical conduit used with the mains
power. Never had a problem.
> --
> From: peterh...@aol.com[SMTP:peterh...@aol.com]
> Reply To: peterh...@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 1:56 AM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subjec
international recommendations. You should check with your national
authorities to see if there are legally required limits in your country.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic
You have to look to the standards for the answer. Since the Australian
standards follow CISPR, the standards require that you test at the nominal
voltage and frequency of the country. Australia's power system is 240V 50 Hz
(some areas in the outback can reach as high as 250V nominal). A retest of
t
2 dB was the required margin for initial acceptance to the VDE standard for
ITE. Of course, the VDE standards are no longer mandatory since the EMC
Directive came into effect. The "new" thinking today is to take measurement
uncertainty into consideration when determining a pass/fail criteria. For
e
Chris the approach you have mentioned is not too different than the one
adopted by ETSI. ETSI has adopted the "shared risk" approach to setting
limits. The standards specify the limits and the maximum allowed measurement
uncertainty. Any measured value up to and including the limit is acceptable
as
TVs and radios have a specified signal rejection. That is, they must
continue to operate with a specified minimum signal to noise ratio and a
specified minimum signal. That noise signal may be a spurious emission from
another product. That derived noise signal is projected to a certain
protection d
IEC 950 and its clones require basic insulation between earthed or unearthed
secondary hazardous voltage circuits and earthed conductive parts (Clause
2.2.6 and Table 0.1). Can someone please explain why basic rather than
operational insulation is required?
Let's take a simple example. Assume a h
n our cables over the ground plane and do not have a problem.
Our OATS is in on the edge of a woods with trees on two sides and water on
two sides. On the water sides, we have bushes to "hide" the site (required
by the building code). We have not noticed a problem.
Re how far way an object m
Hans, you raised a very good point that needs to be discussed - the need for
ferrites on the antenna cable. I have read articles indicating that adding
the ferrites when taking NSA measurements was the only way they could make
their site compliant. But I have also heard that the reason the ferrites
Regards,
Barry Ma
-
Original Text
From: "WOODS, RICHARD" , on 11/11/98 1:21 PM:
Consult C63.7, "Guide for Construction of Open-Area Test Sites. We
built
our
site according to the guidelines with two exceptions: we so
Only emissions compliance is required. You can find the complete set of EMC
rules at http://www.sma.gov.au/.
--
From: roger...@astec-asia.com [SMTP:roger...@astec-asia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 9:22 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: C
Does the Australian ITE emissions standard AS/NZS 3548 provide both Class A
and Class B limits?
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For h
Rich, et al; there is a fourth option and that is the one the originator was
referencing. When not following one of the three programs that Rich noted;
the inspectors require Certificates of Conformity from the molder for each
lot. The document must list the molder's name, the material used and the
Now, I am going to have to ask representatives of the agencies that are on
this mailing list to address these two issues.
Assuming the parts have not been inspected elsewhere, my experience has been
that when the inspector picks up a molded part, he must find the molder's
approved mark; or, if non
ANSI C63.7:1992, Guide for Construction of Open-Area Test Sites for
Performing Radiated Emissions Measurements. We used this guide when we built
our 10 m site and we had no problem in passing the site atttenuation test.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed
officials
who monitor the marketplace.
I have always heard rummors about New York (city or state?) and Chicago
having similar laws. Once you learn all about this, I suggest that you post
the results.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not
Since the UK law, as interpreted below by Nick, says that the DoC must be
signed by a resident of the EU, and since the DG who wrote the Directive has
stated that the DoC may be signed by a non-EU resident, is it now up to the
courts to decide who is right? What is the law in the EU regarding this
Volker, thank you for this useful information. You indicated that
the decisions are to be followed by all of the test houses, yet many of the
decisions appear to be accepted in only some countries. If all of the test
houses are expected to follow the decision, why are country exceptions
all
EN 55103-1:1997 (immunity) and EN55103-2:1997 (emissions) are the product
family standards for "audio, video, audio-visual and entertainment lighting
control apparatus for profession use." CISPR 13, 14 and 22 and are listed as
normative references.
--
From: Art Michael [SM
]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 1998 4:28 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; WOODS, RICHARD
Subject: RE: Questions on Plug Adapters
Richard,
It has been a few years now that for ITE, NRTLs do not require a
detachable type power supply cord to be shipped with
If you have UL Listing, then you must ship a power cord with each unit. The
cord shipped must be acceptable for the target country - i.e., have the
appropriate safety approval.
--
From: CRAIG HENSLEY [SMTP:hens...@iomega.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 3:2
Can someone point me to a web site that has information in English
concerning the German x-ray certification and marking information
required for monitors?
Section 725-27(a) of the US National Electrical Code requires that Class
1 conductors be in a "listed cable." Tray Cable is acceptable for Class
1 use, but it is not plenum rated. Is anyone aware of a Listed Class 1
cable that is plenum rated?
No complaint from me on the power cord, Matthias. You are correct. What is
TUV's official position on the colors of the internal primary wiring?
> --
> From: Matthias R. Heinze[SMTP:hei...@tuv.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 1998 11:40 AM
> To: WOOD
Jim, HD 384 does not cover the construction of equipment; rather it covers
the installation. So the colors specified are for building wiring and
flexible cables. The latter includes the mains flexible cable of equipment.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed
d on the market"
does not pertain solely to the very first unit of a production series.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Gail Birdsall[SMTP:gbi
The ac wiring color codes for the EU are specified in the HD 384 series
which are based upon the IEC 60364 series.. The HD series has been compiled
in one single BSI standard, BS 7671:1992/A1:1994/A2:1997. The color scheme
is specified in Chapter 51.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo
I too have had problems with TUV requiring brown/blue, so it became a
company standard from the inlet to the first component. UL and CSA had no
problem with this arangement.
> --
> From: s_doug...@ecrm.com[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
> Reply To: s_doug...@ecrm.com
> Sent:
be held in confidence.
Thanks, in advance.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
P.O Box 310700
Boca Raton, FL 33431-0700
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
comply with FCC part 68's requirements for network protection, and you must
also pass additional testing for the safety approval from the NRTL.
Good luck.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensor
Has anyone seen this document?
> --
> From: Paul Smith[SMTP:smi...@stranduk.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 1998 3:21 AM
> To: 'WOODS, RICHARD'
> Subject: RE: EN 55103-1 and -2
>
> Richard,
>
> I would hazard a guess at yes (sur
VFD - variable frequency drive. They are more efficient than mains powered
motors and are used in HVAC applications.
> --
> From: Matthias R. Heinze[SMTP:hei...@tuv.com]
> Reply To: Matthias R. Heinze
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 1998 3:51 PM
> To: Pryor McGinnis; emc-p
Thanks for your reply. In your opinion, If I am selling a CCTV camera for
security applications and for applications covered by these standards, must
I claim compliance to both sets of standards on my D of C?
> --
> From: Paul Smith[SMTP:smi...@stranduk.com]
> Reply To: Paul Sm
e expand on what "professional" covers?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
irements." Clause
> 7.2.2 specifies that test equipment be coupled directly to the power
> supply lines of the EUT. There are no restrictions that the power ports
> must be directly connected to the AC mains.
>
> Richard Woods
> Sensormatic Electronics
> wo...@sensormatic.com
> Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
> Sensormatic.
>
>
>
As noted in a previous posting, on June 8, 1998, the Council adopted EC
Common Position 39/98 that proposes a Directive on radio equipment and
telecommuniations terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their
conformity. This is my analysis of the proposed Directive as it relates to
radios.
The real issues are the sharpness of the waveform and ringing, i.e.,
harmonics.
An RC network on the output will suppress the harmonics on the signal trace.
In addition, power to the osc must be isolated with a ferrite bead and cap
to prevent contamination of the power bus.
> --
> From:
Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: lfresea...@aol.com[SMTP:lfresea...@aol.com]
> Reply To: lfresea...@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 1
lding at 600 MHz. Using these assumptions and
combining the two equations above, one is left with the equation L(cm) =
2.5/sqr(N). Now this is an equation the Mechanical Engineers and Designers
can live with.
Comments?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed b
"rules of thumb" for Mechicanical types?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
* The IEEE EMC Society publishes a periodical.
* Compliance Engineering (bi-monthly): Compliance Engineering, 70
Codman Hill Road, Boxborough, MA, 01719, USA (I believe they have a web
site)
* ITEM (yearly):R&B Enterprises, 20 Clipper Road, West Conhohocken, PA
19428-2721, USA
>
Let's take an example - a motor operated business machine that contains
digital logic. In my opinion, it must be judged under the generic emissions
standard because it produces both continuous and discontinuous interference.
The applicable sections of EN55022 and EN55014 must be met. The same would
.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Knighten, Jim[SMTP:knigh...@exchange.sandiegoca.ncr.com]
> Reply To: Knighten, Jim
> Sent: Tuesday, Jul
med and the suitability of
the plastics was not tested. So what the #$@% did UL do? Anyway, before you
incorporate a Recognized part into your design, obtain the Conditions of
Acceptability from the manufacturer.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the autho
cturer that has done
this, because I was the one that did it.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
The British code is BS 7671:1992, A1:1994 and A2 1997; also known as the IEE
Wiring Regulations, 16th Edition. The best part about this code, over the
CENELEC and IEC codes, is that it is available in one document.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the
As I recall from my college chemistry many years ago, the concentration
would be considered to be 100% unless an "X% isopropyle alcohol solution"
was specified.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represen
Lexmark seems to think that there is a market. They have a patent in this
area and have actively marketed the technology.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
>
I am attempting to keep up on the recycling and take back legislation by
subscribing to "Recycling Laws International" from Raymond Communications,
Inc. (301) 345-4237, www.raymond.com/recycle.
> --
> From: Tony Reynolds[SMTP:reyno...@pb.com]
> Reply To: Tony Reynolds
> Sent:
You should also research the possiblity that the retardants present a
problem with recycling.
> --
> From: Darrell Locke (MSMail)[SMTP:dlo...@advanced-input.com]
> Reply To: Darrell Locke (MSMail)
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 1998 5:40 PM
> To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.o
may test with any other source. It is now up to the user of your converter
to ensure that his total system complies with the conducted emissions
requirements.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic
in a riser
between floors then an "R" or "P" suffix is required. If the cable runs in a
air handling space (plenum) then the cable must have a "P" sufix.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessa
ucted emissions limits. Are my understandings correct?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
Can someone tell me how I can obtain English translations of the German vfg
regulations?
urnal. That is the grand plan.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: R. Heller[SMTP:rehel...@mmm.com]
> Reply To: R. Heller
> Sent: Tuesday, J
Could you be more specific about what is ment by "functional" and "security"
demands?
> --
> From: petter.gar...@enator.se[SMTP:petter.gar...@enator.se]
> Reply To: petter.gar...@enator.se
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 3:42 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject:
n
the device. Is it standard practice among monitor OEMs to "multiple list"
the private brand name on their required RoV documentation?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
My company is in need of a consultant to assist us in obtaining RoV (Germany
X-ray) approval of a monitor. Any suggestions?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
HP produces a very nice line of power supplies where you can program the
voltage, current and frequencies.
> --
> From: Richard Cass[SMTP:richard_c...@iris.scitex.com]
> Reply To: Richard Cass
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 1998 9:37 AM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>
I forgot to mention one very important study. The American Physical Society
(202-662-8700) published a statement in April 1995 concerning "Power Line
Fields and Public Health." You may be able to find this one on the web.
> --
> From: WOODS, RICHARD
> Sent:
m are reported to be magnitudes lower
than those that cause acute effects.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: chuck_p_olb...@waters.com[SMTP:chuck_p_olb
sthadter Landstrasse 1,
D-85764 Neuherberg. Tel: +49 89 31603 288; fax: +49 89 31603 289. Email:
matt...@bfs.de. I understand that Mr. Matthes speaks excellent English.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
95. I have not personally taken this course, but I
have taken another course offered by R&B and found it to be very good.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
>
If the safety instructions are required, then I would assume that you would
want the installer/user to read the instructions prior to the equipment
being installed/powered on. That mandates hard copy safety instructions.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed
My copy of the Equipment Safety Law has a revision date of 1980. Does anyone
have a later revision or can verify that the 1980 revision is the current
revision?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
F: Argue the notices with the orginal NRTL engineer or his manager.
> --
> From: geor...@lexmark.com[SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com]
> Reply To: geor...@lexmark.com
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 1998 4:14 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: NRTL Value
>
>
> H
on.
3) Regardless of the answer to 2), does Germany actually mandate legal
compliance with the GS requirements - i.e, is the Equipment Safety law of
1980 enforced? This question appears to still be unanswered.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author d
impede trade. To this latter group I ask the question, what is the legal
basis for this claim?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 1998 12:05 PM
> To: WOODS, RICHARD
> Cc: '@IEEE'
> Subject: RE: GS Requirements
>
> I believe everything you say is correct; however, if you read the first
> page
> of the EMC Directive (if you can get throught the Wheras'
is active. The CE mark denotes compliance with all relevant
Directives - that is all it denotes. Each state can still have laws that
affect the sale and use of equipment as long as the laws are not in conflict
with any Directives.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views
rds. Likewise there is no directive on EMF exposure. The
ENV 50166 series will eventually become the harmonized standards.
Again, all of this is moot if Germany has repealed the Equipment Safety Law
which I don't beleive they have.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.
human
exposure standards have changed. VDE 0848 parts 2 and 4 have been replaced
by ENV 50166-1 and ENV 50166-2. Any further information that anyone has in
this regard would be helpful, especially information on any transition
rules.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Kevin, it is my understanding that ETSI is to include CEPT recommendations
in their standards. The forward to an ETSI standard contains references to
the CEPT recommendations.
> --
> From: Kevin Harris[SMTP:harr...@dscltd.com]
> Reply To: Kevin Harris
> Sent: Friday, Ap
ht of 1.75
m. Where can I find a recognized standard method of measuring whole body
average exposure to a non-uniform magnetic field in the range where SAR is
the dominating effect?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
ed by those
States. The fathom, pint, fluid ounce, gill, ounce, pound, and therm may
be used where they were authorized prior to 21 April 1973 and until the
year 2000. This writer assumes that the only the United Kingdom and
Ireland allow these measurements today.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
601 - 700 of 759 matches
Mail list logo
