Hi Doug,
Been retired for a while now, but FCC Part 18 applies to ISM products (the I
being Industrial). And being Industrial, Class A emissions would likely apply.
Enjoying the AZ sun. Hope this helps.
Ron Pickard
Sent from my smartphone
On Mar 7, 2022, 10:09 AM, at 10:09 AM, Doug Nix
.
I still kind of miss it as it kept me very busy with long nights, but my head
was truly full of mush at the end & I'm glad I'm out now.
Great friday question (made me reminisce).
Ron Pickard
Sent from my smartphone
On Jun 25, 2021, 10:05 PM, at 10:05 PM, Douglas E Powell
wrote:
ance was with product variations found during factory
inspections due to part availability issues and manufacturer ingenuity (loved
working those variation notices).
Enjoying retirement & best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my smartphone
On Jun 25, 2021, 10:59 AM, at 10:59 AM, Douglas E Powell
wro
contact Ulrich Schmidt directly if interested.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
My name is Ulrich and I’m a Staffing Consultant for Intel. I am sourcing for
the position JR0030496 Internet of Things Product Regulatory Engineer. Please
check the following link for further details: http
Many times on this forum it has been determined that B + B does not always =
B. Test to make sure and then declare victory if the results are B.
Best regards,
Ron Wellman
From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:charles.gra...@dish.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 1:50 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
Take a look at 47 CFR 15.103 to see if your device is exempt first.
Best regards,
Ron Wellman
From: Michael Loerzer [mailto:loerzer_mob...@globalnorm.de]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 2:45 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] US EMC req. for EN 61010-1/EN 61326-1 equipment
United States laws are codified in the United States Code (USC). The Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) is the implementation of the laws in the USC.
Ron
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 7:38 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES
What version of S2 does your Customer want you to use? The current version is
SEMI S2-0715 and it does not have a strain relief requirement. Neither does
S2-0706. SEMI S22-0715 does. Paragraph 17.7.3 in S22 references the strain
relief test in paragraph 22.7.
Ron Wellman
From: Doug
I believe you mean clause 22.7 from SEMI S22? SEMI S2 does not have a
requirement for strain relief. Besides, I am wondering why you are using SEMI
S22? SEMI S22 was created to be a reference document for SEMI S2.
I also agree with the other responses, use an appliance inlet.
Ron
Take a look at Table 250.122 in the National Electrical Code.
Best regards,
Ron Wellman
From: McDiarmid, Ralph [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] size of protective bonding
Yes we have the latest copy.
Thanks
Ron
From: Ron Pickard (RPQ) [mailto:rpick...@rpqconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 11:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC on final product
Additionally, you should have a copy of the current reports associated with
those
box have a
web address printed on it to direct the end user to our D of C?
Also, if the D of C is NOT physically in the shipping box, how does the country
customs inspector know if we meet the required EU LVD requirements?
Thanks
Ron Baugh
This electronic message
A German acquaintance of mine calls them EMC vitamins.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: Bob LaFrance [mailto:b...@creare.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:09 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Ferrite Cores on cables and possible reduction
I
.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Brian Oconnell
oconne...@tamuracorp.com /divdivDate:09/11/2014 1:48 PM (GMT-07:00)
/divdivTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG /divdivSubject: Re: [PSES] weird
stuff in agency agreement form
regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Gary McInturff
gary.mcintu...@esterline.com /divdivDate:08/13/2014 2:25 PM (GMT-07:00)
/divdivTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG /divdivSubject: [PSES] Changes to
verified equipment /divdiv
/divI
Yeah, that's pretty funny. I thought everyone was hibernating.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Scott Douglas
sdoug...@radiusnorth.net /divdivDate:07/10/2014 12:04 AM (GMT-07:00)
/divdivTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Thank you to all that responded. I should've known that that photo was web
linkable.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 10:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Old photo?
If you do
to those interested.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc
is not at all clear on that point). That doesn't seem
practical as most of these eval boards will likely be operated in an
engineering lab type of environment being used by engineers.
Well, that's my 2 cents (2 pence in EU). Comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
, does anyone have an official reference for that ruling? Also, how
widespread is this sort of thing in other countries?
I would like to know of any experiences or knowledge anyone has on this.
Please let me know.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
it.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc
anything like that out there,
commercially available or not.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion
,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Bill Owsley
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:02 PM
To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; 'EMC-PSTC'
Subject: Re: a CAB person and my Python
And some of them are voters too!!!
Tonight at the grocery store, $50 back from
I've followed this thread and am concerned that such an action would constitute
and introduce a significant barrier to trade, which is contrary to the intent
of the scheme of the new approach directives, is it not?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
Original
Edition 2, which
is supposed to be published early next year?
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Richard Nute
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:45 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
Cc: Thomas M Burke
Hi Rich,
Adding one more question to Brian's list.
I know this may be a bit rhetorical, but do you have an idea when the IECEE
will align the CB Scheme to IEC62368 Ed 2, including the TRFs?
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Android phone
Original message
From: Brian
anyway).
IHTH.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Derby
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:43 AM
To: 'itl-emc user group'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC IC
Hi Sudhakar,
Yes, but how would you plan to keep that impact hammer in calibration. Note
that the 50mm steel ball essentially maintains its calibration unless it is
damaged.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org
that your iPhone 5 will likely use any of the above frequency bands
depending on your wireless connection quality at any given time. IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Derek Walton
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 5:16 PM
To: Larry
test report.
Regarding Korea, I will have to bow to others more experienced with the new
KCC requirements.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of McInturff,
Gary
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 6:26 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
of an experienced
independent regulatory consultant, please let me know that, too. It will be
much appreciated as well.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
mailto:rpick...@rpqconsulting.com rpick...@rpqconsulting.com
http://www.rpqconsulting.com/ www.rpqconsulting.com
Hi Ilan,
Please check again as it is showing now. They may have updated it just after
your email was sent.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 1:42 AM
To: oconne
in that list:
EN 50581:2012, Technical documentation for the assessment of electrical and
electronic products with respect to the restriction of hazardous substances
Best regards,
Ron
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Joe Randolph [mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 12:43 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] POE creepage clearances
Hi Ian:
I think the short answer to your question is that under 60950 there are no
requirements
Hi Ralph,
Thanks for pointing that out, but I didn't think I had to mention that since
Ian had already noted it being +12Vdc.
Best regards,
Ron
From: ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com
[mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
Hi Tom,
That symbol is a China RoHS marking found in document SJ/T11364-2006 issued by
the MII where the specifications for that symbol are given. This symbol's
intent is to indicate a product to be environmentally friendly.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Tom Smith [mailto:tsm
? :-)
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:55 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Testing EUT
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA489140AA0@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Wed, 31 Oct 2012
To all,
FYI. Revised harmonized standards lists for the EMC and RTTE directives were
just published today in the OJ. Here's the link:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:321:SOM:EN:HTML
Best regards,
Ron
the recast RoHS Directive.
Accessory items such as you've described may or may not have other EU
directives applicable to them.
Comments?
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Mark Schmidt [mailto:mark.schm...@dornerworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 8:59 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
in the
USA or in the UK. Please advise.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: Ron Pickard RPQ [mailto:rpick...@rpqconsulting.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 5:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: EN 1300 accredited test labs?
Hello,
This may
,
Ron Pickard
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable
FYI, in today's OJ, a new LVD harmonized standards
listhttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:245:SOM:EN:HTML was
posted.
Best regards,
Ron
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
To all,
FYI. The EU's recast WEEE Directive (2012/19/EU) was published in the OJ on
24-Jul. The link to it is
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:197:0038:0071:EN:PDF.
Best regards,
Ron
Hi Scott,
As for this and the RoHS directives being a matching pair and from a cursory
review, it appears that these two directives are now autonomous.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:29 AM
To: Ron Pickard; EMC-PSTC (EMC-PSTC
Hi Scott,
That's not always the case. I've had experience with auto-ranging 120/240V
products where no voltage selector switch was needed.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Aldous, Scott [mailto:scott.ald...@aei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:59 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES
I believe you are reading that correctly as EU directive 2006/66/EC pertains to
batteries and accumulators, which is a RoHS-like directive that has its own
marking requirement.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, June
echoed by more than one
individual knowledgeable with this.
IHTH.
If anyone else has anything to contribute or has more inside information on
this, please let us know.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron
(Please note my new email address, rpick...@equinoxpayments.com)
From: Mark
standard effectivity for a
presumption of conformity. I use those lists as a means to keep products up to
date regulatorily (sp?) speaking. And, keeping test reports and the DofC up to
date keeps existing and prospective customers happy.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: McInturff, Gary
not been
modernized to align with current product safety standards, but it is still
something that we have to do to satisfy our Customers.
Best regards,
Ron
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Kunde, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:32 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
, approach with caution.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:29 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] e-standard.org The cheapest standards in the world
Does anyone have experience with the subject standards vendor
pertain to your
product. Please note that Kuwait is a GCC/GSO member.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Gartman, Richard [mailto:rgart...@ti.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:28 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Kuwait regulations
Panel
Hi Moshe,
That would likely be IEEE 1725, which is a CTIA/PTCRB requirement for mobile
cellular type phones.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Blackberry
From: Moshe Henig [mailto:moshe.he...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:59 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC
outlined below. Please
also find my comments below.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:00 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] receiving/approval processes under fire
Hi Brian,
I have to repeat Rich's sentiment below, Good luck. Hopefully, he/she will
have had some positive compliance exposure before the breaking in.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Oconnell
Sent: Thursday
has not made it clear if this device is also or will be
also put on the market or put into service for end user use. If it is, then
Martin has no choice but to comply with the EMC directive (CE mark this device)
regardless of its intended application. Martin, please advise.
Best regards,
Ron
, does the new EESS requirements
apply to B2B products, or not? Would then the ACMA marking requirements still
only apply to non-household products without EESS concern? Please advise.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron
(Please note my new email address, rpick...@equinoxpayments.com
efficiency. Please note that this is a
very brief answer to your question.
Also, please note that the ACMA is imposing new requirements effective
1-Jul-2012 that were discussed at length very recently on this forum.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
(Please note my new email address, rpick...@equinoxpayments.com
German is still at Austest, tell him I said hi.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Martin
Garwood
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:14 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] ACMA labelling
, but there will probably never
be full harmonization as Australia and New Zealand are independent sovereign
states.
I hope this brief reply answered your question.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick
Williams
Sent: Thursday
are found at
http://www.acma.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WEB/STANDARD/1001/pc=PC_1756. I would
hope that the ACMA will offer artwork-ready graphics of the RCM mark soon like
they have for the C-tick and A-tick marks.
Best regards,
Ron
(Please note my new email address, rpick...@equinoxpayments.com
Yup, you can tell it's Friday, alright.
Great quote from Dark Helmet, in the age where raspberries are weapons and air
is canned.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 12:21 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
mandatory in 2008, thus superseding the
voluntary Energy Star requirements for EPS. Refer to Section 301 for EPS.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Mcburney,
Ian
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:17 AM
To: emc-p
appear that the commencement would be
contingent on the EESS and the database becoming active. Although the ACMA
will probably announce it, do you have an idea when that database will become
active?
Best regards,
Ron
From: Kevin Richardson [mailto:kevin.richard...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday
formhttp://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib310117/c01-application_for_permission_to_use_regulatory_marks.pdf
available online.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 3:46 PM
-160 Environmental Conditions and Test
Procedures for Airborne Equipment.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Steve O'Steen [mailto:steve.ost...@acstestlab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:03 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Transient and Surge Test per ISO7637-2
All,
I
to be
updated to include this directive along with a due diligent establishment of
conformity.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: iun...@servomex.com [mailto:iun...@servomex.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:39 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS - an EU view
Group
, the balance of your product would likely still need to comply.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 9:38 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS - an EU view
If you have a product who's category falls
that the average consumer has no idea about such things,
hence the need for the seemingly ubiquitous universal input nowadays and
especially for consumer products (my opinion).
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: Friday, January
.
Best regards,
Ron
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Andrew
Robbins
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 9:45 AM
To: John Cotman; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] I'm at a loss on lasers
Lasers sold in the US must be registered with the FDA. Sold
requirements. So, those higher ESD thresholds are quite likely not
regulatory requirements, but if anyone knows if the ESD requirements from IEC
60601-1-2, 3rd Edition, please let us know. You might want to verify these
thresholds from your customer.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: McInturff, Gary
Forwarding from Dave Osborn. Find below some ESD developments associated with
IEC 60601-1-2, 3rd and 4th Editions.
Dave, thanks for that info.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Osborn, Dave [mailto:dave.osb...@philips.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:51 AM
To: Ron Pickard; McInturff, Gary
Subject
I refer you to what Rich Nute posted.
From: Tyra, John [mailto:john_t...@bose.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 9:24 AM
To: 'Ron Wellman'; 'peterh...@aol.com'; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: RE: Mandatory NRTL certification
As I mentioned in my previous posts the laws in 16
the equipment!)
Most NRTLs are accepted by most retailers and
most medical facilities.
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ron Wellman
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:49 PM
To: peterh...@aol.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE
the
risks of not having NRTL listing, it will be easier to manage.
Best regards,
Ron Wellman
From: Tyra, John [mailto:john_t...@bose.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 6:34 AM
To: 'Ron Wellman'; 'peterh...@aol.com'; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: RE: Mandatory NRTL certification
For Consumer products I see your point, but what about test, measurement,
and laboratory equipment? These products are usually sold business to
business and it's really up to the Customer to decide if NRTL is required
for the sale.
Best regards,
Ron Wellman
From: Tyra, John [mailto:john_t
Companies
require third party approvals as a condition of sale. Therefore, unless you
want to be reactive to Customer sales I would make sure your Marketing
people understand the risk of losing a sale if your product is not
certified/listed by an NRTL.
Best regards,
Ron Wellman
From: emc-p
(fictional anyway):
Things are only impossible until they're not. Jean-Luc Picard (Star Trek)
Best regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:47 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Experts and Wisdom
) and possibly recommend any along with experiences they've had
with them (pro or con).
If agreeable, I will tabulate the feedback and provide it back to the group.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron
-
This message is from
regards,
Ron
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable
I think this one fits nicely.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Sent from my Blackberry
From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 01:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Scott GRIGGS [mailto:griggs_sc...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:08 AM
To: Ron Pickard; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements for batteries in Mobile Phones
Hi Ron,
Peter M had pointed out that regulatory requirements vary
.
And, IATA requirements are indeed mandatory and can generally be satisfied with
successful UN T1-T8 testing.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Safety
for UL and/or CCS in any way.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:charles.gra...@echostar.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] NOM-121 approved labs
Peter – Just for my clarification.
Are you saying that UL can do wireless
a safety report, I believe it’s a good idea to include one anyway, but
that’s a preference and not a requirement.
Dan,
I hope you can now answer your friend’s questions.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
and as always, I stand to be corrected
where needed. Comments?
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim Robson
Sent
to step up and put down some green to buy it. It may very
well be cheaper in the long run.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:45 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
they relate to components. From that,
you might get the reasoning of Turkish Customs.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of peter
/ ) is as it reports an “unknown www server” error
when attempting access? I am guessing that their web server is currently
disabled for the moment. Or, is the web address different?
Please advise. I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick
that a definitive text should be referenced (or copied
verbatim) instead of creating separate and different requirements per
directive. But, since this situation has existed for many years now, it's
unlikely to be corrected any time soon.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com
From
) available to you.
Also I believe that the LPS marking is an accepted industry practice, not a
regulatory requirement. If anyone disagrees with this, please provide a
compelling argument.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
(or not), and work with your NRTL CB NCB to
determine what you need to do to make the new power supply acceptable for your
product. Your product’s safety reports will likely need to be updated to
reflect the new power supply anyway.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick
to “harmonized standards”,
not present in the current directive. Will there be a harmonized standards
list such as is already in place for other various directives? Does anyone at
present know what those harmonized standards will be?
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ
Hi Ed,
It’s nice to hear from you again. See my comments following your questions
below. Let me know if you agree or not or have additional questions. I’m
hoping others will chime in and give their opinions, too. If not, that’s ok,
too.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
question in a nutshell and hope that the above has adequately answered
your question. And, if anyone cares to interject, add or correct the above in
any way, please do.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
From
Hi Anders,
You should be able to find what you’re looking for on Ghana’s National
Communication Authority (NCA) website at http://www.nca.org.gh/index.asp.
Ghana’s Ministry of Communication’s website might also be useful at
http://www.moc.gov.gh/.
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
, counsel(or), legal
eagle, ambulance chaser, etc, etc. Therefore, the above is not legal advice
and should not be considered as such. If it was, I would be charging you at
least $500/hr (with a retainer).
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
From
their own HAC requirements? If you know
of any, what are those requirements?
I look forward to your reply(ies).
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion
Hi Grace,
Then for the sake of consistency, does the BSMI also confirm 3m distance is
acceptable per CNS13438, or not? Just curious.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Intermec Technologies
Cedar Rapids, IA
(319) 369-3142
ron.pick...@intermec.com
….
Also, I have appreciated your contributions to this list and hope you continue
to do so.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
From: Grace Lin [mailto:graceli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11
Hi Ed,
Google spherical cow and you'll be enlightened. And given the concept,
I'm quite sure the term could find its way into a status report or two.
:-)
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Price,
Edward
Sent
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
