I know this is old now, but I happened to see a real Canon FD-EOS adapter on
eBay tonight:
http://tinyurl.com/3cvyk2
New in the box, for only $699.
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin
Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, October 24,
Try taking the other small battery out as well (see page 35 of the manual)
and leave then out overnight.
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pattie
Anderson
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 2:42 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS
Probably because the link is missing the l that wrapped around to the next
line. Try this:
http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20071015_eflens.html
Or this:
http://tinyurl.com/25z2h5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Has anyone heard a price for this lens, or an explanation of why we had
to loose the 1/2 stop compared to the old 200mm f/1.8 L?
Mr. Bill
Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
Probably because the link is missing the l that wrapped around to the
next
line. Try this:
http://www.usa.canon.com
If you found a genuine Canon FD/EOS adapter on eBay, then you would have
paid several hundred dollars for it. Otherwise, it probably just has the
Canon name on it.
Here's a link to a picture of the real thing (with some additional
documentation) one on the MIR.com website (top picture) to compare
Yet another uninformed opinion, based completely on my own preferences, but
hey, at least I'm honest about it!
This is a particularly bad time to sell the 28-135mm since there are 40D
kits that include a new one and sell for only $200 more than just the
camera. Once the 18-55 IS becomes the kit
Kim, I think you'll find the 40D to be a quite capable camera, it was a big
upgrade for me from the 20Ds I was using.
As a long-time film user, your wide angle lens is probably a 20mm or longer,
and you'll want to consider how to remedy that with the 1.6x crop factor
digital body.
For a digital
Card size is a religious question I think, not a scientific one. On the one
hand, loss and/or damage is minimized by not having to swap cards in and out
of the camera, but there's that all your eggs in one basket mentality
against using small cards. On a 40D with a typical RAW file size of 12.5Mb,
Photography is art, so photographers are artists, right? So why should
everything have to be so utilitarian? It seems to me at least marginally
reasonable to want to extend that artistic endeavor to the equipment as
well. Who can browse here:
http://www.cameraleather.com/
without feeling a
Eau contrere! Women and black clothing are redundant words ;-)
Carolyn Segal takes this up in a report from the Modern Language Association,
Dressed to Impress (Chronicle of Higher Education, January 26). At a session
on `narratology' and melancholia she noticed that the woman next to her was
and I always
loved my all-black Motorola StarTac phone.
Mr. Bill
Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
Photography is art, so photographers are artists, right? So why
should
everything have to be so utilitarian? It seems to me at least
marginally
reasonable to want to extend that artistic endeavor
On 27/09/07, Tom Pfeiffer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Who can browse here:
http://www.cameraleather.com/
without feeling a little attracted to one of these little works of
art?
Pure porn!
BTW I know a guy who likes a little snake skin on his gear
http://www.cottysnaps.com
No first-hand experience, but a blower seems safe as long as you don't touch
the mirror:
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=009LtE
I'd say using ANYTHING on it, including Eclipse and a pec-pad, would be a
bad idea.
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the 28-70L is a fantastic lens, but I'd take the 17-35L as well.
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Haber
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 5:01 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS recommended lenses for trip?
Hi everyone--
I
All joking aside, we did have a print operator once at our Chicago office
who almost lost his arm from a paper cut from an IBM 3800 (which used the
LARGE rolls of paper and cut and stacked it into letter sized sheets.
You learned to stay away from the incoming paper path.
Tom P.
PS - You guys
!
Tom P.
PS - You also got paid overtime? Sheesh, THAT would have been nice.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 9:04 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS CF Cards and deletion
Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
The Next
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:53 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS CF Cards and deletion
Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
So you were one of those guys who came in, completely disassembled a
reader/punch all over the computer
In fact, I had a 2gb 80X Lexar card at the time that was in the serial
number range of the Bad ones, although I hadn't had any trouble with it.
When I called Lexar to see about returning it, they were happy to give me an
RMA number, but the technician told me that I could also just upgrade the
The Next Big Thing when I was a programmer was top down, structured
programming (COBOL and 370 Assembler).
Like Jane, I remember the days fondly, the nights not so fondly, and hardly
ever wish I still had a clue what goes on under the hood.
I was one of the lucky ones. We had terminals to do our
Actually, finding an IDE controller for an ISA card slot would be no easy
task, since virtually all hard drives in the days of the XT were either MFM,
RLL or SCSI (ESDI was too minor to count). By the time the 16 bit bus
appeared in '84, Compaq was using lots of Conner IDE drives in their 80286
Ken, are you familiar with the CF card testing done by Rob Galbraith? Here's
the link to his tests for the 1dMkII:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-6896
I've heard (but not tested) that 4Gb cards are inherently slower than 2Gb
cards, perhaps due to cluster sizes or other
Like Bill, I've used LOTS of generics from when I started with a D60 till
now with a 40D, all from eBay. I had ONE battery that didn't fit well when I
went from the 10D to the 20D, other than that all the generics have had
higher capacity and performed as well as or better than the Canon brand. I
Are you using microdrives or real flash memory? Flash memory is extremely
durable. My entire wallet of cards lived through the washing machine AND
dryer once without a single issue. My 4Gb microdrive was much less durable,
though. Plus I'd expect the lifecycle of the card interface to be quite a
Gerry, I think you'll have no problems with any of the Canon batteries
whether BP-511 or BP-511a or any of the generics. One battery that you can
NOT use in the 10D is the BP-514 because it doesn't have the ridge on its'
back between the two internal cells. It will fit fine in the later cameras
Why use a fast USB 2 or Firewire connection when you can make it take twice
as long via a cable? That takes all the fun out of it :)
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Gillooly
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:31 PM
To:
I don't know if it's conspicuous or not, since there's no history in the 5D
lineage to draw from. I suspect it still sells well, and that if it is updated
in the spring, we'll see something like the 20D--30D upgrade. That is, a
bigger LCD, newer DIGIC, little if any change in resolution, and a
Boy, is this a full service group or what!
Where were you yesterday when I was handing over cash for my new 40D. Oh, wait,
you said PROs :(
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mr. Bill
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:55 AM
To:
Try this one, it's Canon specific and very visual!
http://www.sweeting.org/mark/lenses/canon.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:59 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: EOS Angle of view.
Does
IME, if a lens has been sitting awhile, the contacts oxidize and the simple act
of mounting and unmounting it a couple of times cleans the contacts enough that
it works, if it doesn't, a typing eraser usually does! (It works for the flash
contacts that subtly corrode and leave you without
The EOS 5 has a plastic body, too :)
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Gillooly
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 11:36 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS (Fwd) 5D
Send me $1,100 and I'll send you an EOS 5D... ...efinitely an EOS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Parrott
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:23 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: X700 (No EOS)
Hey, a fellow former X700 user! That was also my camera of choice, and
was a really great piece in it's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Willem-Jan
Markerink
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:34 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: (Fwd) RE: EOS 1Ds on Vista
PS: Anyone a clue how to avoid this Hotmail idiocy, only allowing
HTML-formatting,
So are we going to continue to have this tit-for-tat or can we get back to
EOS photography? This thread is well past tiring to the me and likely others
who don't HAVE to be right or wrong or get in the last word.
Tom P.
PS - sorry for the top-posting.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
about
identical photographs of a deceased German leader, and names him by
name.
In EOS related content.my 1D mkIII is still on the first battery
charge, has taken at least 4000 pictures, and still claims to be over
30% capacity on the battery.
On 6/25/07, Tom Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Druy
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:31 AM
To: Eos@A1.Nl
Subject: EOS MkIII
I am surprised that there are no messages or threads about the new 1D
MkIII, which has apparently been shipping.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin
Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 7:10 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS A slightly silly query
Hi Peter,
On the other hand, the pixels density of the 30D and potentially
the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin
Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 5:31 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS A slightly silly query
Hi Peter,
No Austin. If you and I take an image and I use a 10MP sensor on
say a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mat
Hayashibara
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:28 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS RBP511/512 batteries
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:45:47 -0500
From: Steven Ralser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Jones
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 8:08 AM
To: eos
Subject: EOS 24-70mm IS
Hello Eosers,
Does anyone have a hunch (or even sold information!) about when the
proposed 24-70mm IS USM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of carla ruigh
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:40 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS 100-400 or 1.5x or 2x?
Hello all, perpetual lurker here. I have a EOS film and first generation
digital, d60. I have a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Eichhorn
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 10:30 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS 100-400 or 1.5x or 2x?
It appears that the extenders only work with L series lenses. Is
this correct, and if so,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Lin
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:13 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS Heathrow with a Pelican 1510
Seriously I am very close in pulling the trigger on this one, I saw an out
of town friend
Hmmm, since one of my replies actually showed up yesterday, maybe I'll get
lucky again. I know this is really old news now, but I seem to be plagued by
the same issues Ken had in getting mail to show up here.
Tomp
From: Tom Pfeiffer [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerard Maas
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:07 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS 5D High Speed Flash Sync Mode - potential bug
Hi all,
While doing some 'frozen flash' images I discovered some
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip
Pemberton
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 6:22 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS Fun at the park, 400D style
Well, seeing as everyone seems to be in a sharing mood... I thought I'd
share
some
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schlake
(William Colburn)
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EOS List Latency and Otters and gmail
I recently sent an email to the list of EOS Oh yea, pictures!.
It took me a while to find them, the ID I found was just big_is, but I did
find them. I have no prior experience with them, but I hope they are decent
if only because Canon's $100+ price tag for tripod rings has always been
outrageous. I have tried a couple of the third party tulip lens hoods and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne S
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 8:47 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS EF 135mm f/2L
At 11:17 PM 3/10/2007, you wrote:
The 24mm F1.4 is nice but not the sharpest. The 35mm F1.4L is amazing.
Hmmm, I got Bob's reply at 4:56AM (Hong Kong time) and your original message
an hour and 39 minutes later at 6:35AM.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Durling
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:31 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS test
Jimbo, you better not have started taking anything I say too seriously.
tomp
I used to use a photo specific sig for this group, but haven't had that
one for
awhile. As far as I know, sigs are the one place where you can link you
homepage
and say a little blurb about your business and
The annual PMA (Photo Marketing Association) show occurs, I believe, in
early March. New products are commonly introduced there, and often
announced
a week or two before the show. That's close enough that I would wait to
see
if anything is announced and if not, then I'd buy the 5D. Even
--
Jim Davis, Owner, Eastern Beaver Company:
http://easternbeaver.com/ Motorcycle Relay Kits,
Modulator Kits, Powerlet, Centech, Posi-Lock, Parts.
1988 K100RS SE ABS in Japan. 1991 ST1100 in America.
STOC#6327, IBMWR, KBMW
*
With all the hot mail flying about, I'm surprised no one took
PMA 07 is March 8-11 in Las Vegas, NV.
Just my luck, I have to be in Dallas that weekend :-(
And while the 5D price might go down the replacement price will be high
for a few months..
Bob
Well, hey, if you get any free time while you're here, we could go out and
get some shots
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Read
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:20 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS 5d - buy now or wait for new model?
Hi,
I'm fairly new here so perhaps this is a bit off-topic, but I've
actually
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James B.Davis
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:08 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS posts
Face it Ken, you're using Comcast for E-mail. You know just because you
use an
ISP to connect
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:36 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS protective filters
Bill Gillooly wrote:
Oh, no, you've got me started...
I never could figure out why when Canon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Gillooly
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 3:25 PM
To: Canon EOS Mailing List
Subject: EOS 16-35 vs. 17-35
As a USM upgrade to my venerable EF 20-35mm f/2.8L, I'm considering one
of the newer
Hmmmph, I never thought there was an Olympus camera big enough or heavy
enough to damage a floor :)
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Lawrence
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:07 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Lin
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:46 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS 20D calibration
That might work provided you haven't rolled the counter over already...
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dudeck
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:59 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS 20D calibration
Nobody has mentioned that the folder number, such as 154CANON, indicates
the
number of hundreds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Gillooly
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:36 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS 20D calibration
How do you find how what the total number of frames shot on an EOS 10D
and 20D???
Mr. Bill
I like my 19 LCD monitor as well (Dell Ultrasharp 1905). 1280x1024 is the
defacto resolution for 19, but for 20 monitors most except the very
cheapest are 1600x1200.
One nice feature is a monitor that pivots, so that if you're working on a
vertical image, you can fill the screen with it (the Dell
The 20Da has a CMOS sensor specially modified for Astrophotography.
Notice that since Canon's sensors became CMOS they are all made by Canon
This info is from http://www.dpreview.com
Bob
The 20Da has the same sensor as the 20D, only the low pass filter is
modified (also from
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Chandler
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 7:28 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS Blurry pics.
Sorry, I should have mentioned that by not focus properly I meant that
focus lock would occur but
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 3:11 PM
To: EOS list
Subject: Re: EOS Canon digital sensors
On 20/11/06, Tom Pfeiffer, discombobulated, unleashed:
In a humorous OT comment, I got one
Canon makes its' own sensors. Nikon doesn't make most of its' sensors, many
are Sony (D50/70/100/200) and a few have been Kodak.
You can look at reviews of specific models and they will generally identify
the semsor manufacturer. DPReview lists the sensor manufaturer in it's
specifications.
Tom
I think you're confusing the minimum aperture at which AF will work (f/8 on
the EOS 3 and 1 series bodies, f/5.6 on everything else), to the combination
(horizontal vertical) central AF spot that enabled lenses of f/2.8 or
faster to focus using that AF point much faster/more accurately. AFAIK,
The
boosters both had identical vertical controls, the battery pack did
not.
Not correct. The PB E1 has only the AE Lock button.
The PB E2 has AE Lock, FE lock and focus point selector. The
E2 also has it's own main dial by the vertical shutter
release. I'm pretty sure the E1
Well, you can buy a used 20D from BH for $819.
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Meier
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 1:08 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS Rebel XTi vs 30D
The problem is that currently I
can't
I've always stuck to center point focusing, even on the 35 point bodies like
the EOS 3 and 1V.
The few times I didn't set a new camera that way, it only took a few days to
lose shots and I would then go change it.
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Bob, I really think your issue with the Giottos might be sample quality. I
have the same head that I use on a pair of 3021 legs, and I've been very
pleased with it, although my largest lens is the 100-400. I didn't have it
when I still had the 300 2.8, but my gut feeling is that it would be ok
Harman, you left out the new F4:
F4: 550 USD
F4 IS: 1250 USD
F2.81150 USD
F2.8 IS 1550 USD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Harman Bajwa
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:58 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re:
I've noticed how heavy those circular polarizers are, wish they were as
light as the old linear ones..
;^)
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jane Waters
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:14 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re:
My opinion for a prime, the 35L without question.
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:33 PM
To: EOS list
Subject: EOS One Lens
Hello fellow EOSers,
Here's a question to get the list
Sounds like a good reason to get a CF Tripod :)
The LCx remotes are IR, so they would probably work ok through a clean, dry
car window.
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Reese
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 8:26 AM
To: EOS LIST
Bob, specs say:
Supports BP-511 / BP-511A / BP-512 / BP-514
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Turner
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:49 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS 5D + BP-511
Having a 10D and a G5, I have accumulated 6 x
I also use a Nova 5 as my everyday bag and I always use the
lens-pointing-down method, typically with a 17-40 or 28-135 lens attached.
With smaller lenses like these I don't think there is really any issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I beleive this grid screen fits all of the later Canon 1D digital models as
well as the original 1D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pattie Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:32 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS For sale: RS-60E3
The problem with the vertical grip is a known issue and Canon will fix it.
On an under-6 size field with small (7?) teams, you'll probably want about
200mm normally (~135mm on a 1.6 Crop body), but something wider for those
unexpected close ups, so the 28-135mm should be a decent lens. The
Yes:
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/eosfaq/ettl2.html
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Derek Seaman
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:59 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS 24-70/2.7L Distance Information?
Does anyone know if
. Maybe THAT
will help. I love this list; I tend to be a lurker, but a
read everything and learn a lot, even tho I've been in the
profession for 25 years and would rather die than not leave
the house with my 1Ds...
thanks for the input!
Jane
--- Tom Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
This is the first item I've recived with your name on it. Are you being
careful to trim the footer off the messages when you reply? Otherwise the
messages are blocked.
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jane Waters
Sent: Friday,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:33 AM
To: EOS list
Subject: EOS 70-200 Sharp
Can anyone point me to a web resource where side-by-side
testing of both the 70-200 L IS zooms in f/2.8 and f/4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:33 AM
To: EOS list
Subject: EOS 70-200 Sharp
Can anyone point me to a web resource where side-by-side
testing of both the 70-200 L IS zooms in f/2.8 and f/4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Moortgat
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 11:45 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS Battery problem in 5D
I waited to answer because I would see if it was as Malcolm wrote.
Indeed the battery
In my two decades of programming, this was the hardest part. :)
But that was long ago and far away.
tomp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schlake (William Colburn)
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:29 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Lin
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:43 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS: (off topic) renaming part of a file name
Not sure if I understand your question, but why don't you
use the old
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Eastwood
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:23 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: are all EOSs EOS?
ah yes ... them too ... won't fit onto any of my EOS film
bodies either. Now that I've got one
Ok, situation clear now.
Go buy some cheap (like these on eBay: http://tinyurl.com/m5epo)
non-electronic tubes and file the flange on the back piece. Use them only
for your Hartblei, not a big expenses, around $20-25.
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
They wouldn't work.
What kind of manual lens are you trying to use with the tubes?
tomp
-Original Message-
From: Stan Patz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:13 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EOS extension tubes
To
Yes the best thing about RAW is exposure control
after-the-fact, but to be honest I shoot JPEG 99% of the time
because my end result is a print from a printer that cannot
out-resolve the original.
Cheers,
Cotty
No argument here, I still shoot more JPG than RAW myself, it's
Not for long ;^)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of }
ponyboy {
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:17 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS printing RAW?
I believe you can print a RAW file directly without
conversion with Apple
I'm assuming this is a lens with some other mount other than EOS and that
you're using an adapter to match it to the front of your extension tube. If
so, you need to get an extension tube for that mount and fit it between the
adapter and lens and not use the EOS extension tubes. The switch you're
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 12:23 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS Comments
You guys are great but I must tell you that there is a rat
among us who forwarded comments
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J.A.C.MacNeill
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:12 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS printing RAW?
At the risk of looking like I don't have a clue, I have been
messing around with RAW images in Capture
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W S
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:47 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: RE: EOS Substitute lens hoods for 180 macro
OK, I figured out that part of the naming of the lens hoods
corresponds to their size.
Nah, I still use a Stofen, too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob Chandler
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:02 AM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: Re: EOS Diffusers
Hi
It'll be interesting to see the final results. I think I'm
the
Buy a spare original hood and cut it down to the size you want, or cut down
one of the rubber ones.
And I suppose we could argue that technically, the hood doesn't change the
working distance, it just fills part of it. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marco Gamba
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:54 PM
To: eos@a1.nl
Subject: EOS Wedding results!
Bad posting the last one pasting the links!!! :)
Ok tell me what do you think...
Some of the
In all fairness, the review you point to isn't a comparison between the
Canon and the Tamron, but between the Canon and a Zeiss.
There are plenty of comparisons between them on the net, however:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=36283
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
