RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

Hi there There are some drawbacks to clusters: 1) They are more difficult to administer 2) Memory fragmentation 3) Extra steps when setting up a front end/ back end configuration 4) Cannot support SRS 5) MS now only recommends Active/ Passive (Some PSS techs have gone as far as saying Active/

RE: Virus with XP

Hi there This is a known virus - Symantec has a removal tool for this. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus with XP My home computer (window XP) was infected with

RE: Error I had not seen before

Hi there Make sure you have both a host and lmhost on the boxes. I did this and the messages disappeared. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error I had not

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

NewsGator which integrates with Outlook -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes Hi Martin Can you tell me how you did this? I just downloaded a RSS newsreader and I

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

Hi Martin Can you tell me how you did this? I just downloaded a RSS newsreader and I don't know how to get it to work with MS.. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

If it helps, we use Postini. Not too expensive while fighting off viruses and spam. It's work a look. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight

RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS

Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange Russell -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS If brute force isn't working for you, chances are, you aren't

RE: Routing Goups query

If you can't send from the box, try running WinRoute and see information that provides... Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing Goups query It's not

RE: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail)

There are two that I like: Singlefin Postini Both seem to work rather well. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

Hi there I have used Frontbridge - good but pricey. Singlefin is good and much less expensive - but small. We're testing Postini right now. My opinion - Singlefin, then Postini. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04,

RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server too much

Hi Joe There are a couple of questions I have: 1) There is a server that is attached to that message. If you have more than one Exchange server, are you sure you have the right server (it's happened to me here)? 2) Is this a remote user or a local user (I'm assuming a local user, but again,

RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server too much

and everything is pointing to the gig card on the server. The 10/100 does not seem to be used at all. ??? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server too

RE: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet?

Here also. We went round and round, and I finally took the attitude, I can tell you what are the pros and cons, and my recommendation. However, you do pay me, so I will do as you ask. Ultimately, the PHB decided to allow OOF to the internet. When I went on vacation for two weeks, guess what I

RE: Clustering Exchange 2000

Hi there As a person that has a cluster exchange, let me comment: 1) You cannot run the SRS service on a cluster. 2) Microsoft highly recommends an Active - Passive setup 3) There are extra steps needed to get a front end/ back configuration to work properly 4) The cluster is much more

RE: Mailbox Hacked

Hi there Yes, this is possible. RFC2821 - SMTP does not require authentication. However, here are some of the tip-offs: Every time I have seen this done, you get the SMTP address in the from field rather than a name Check the header of the email. That will tell you where everything came from

RE: Possible hardware issue?

Hi there Could this possibly be a DNS issue? The only reason I say this is because you're saying that if you move the people to a different server, the problem goes away. Could there be something in a HOST or LMHOST file jacking things up?? HTH Russell -Original Message- From:

RE: wear a cup if you plan on posting questions

Hi there When I first joined this group, I made this very same mistake (asking a question that was clearly in a Q article). Yes, I was slightly insulted. Then I realized something... I WAS BEING LAZY. By making sure that I look everywhere and put in the work myself before I ask a question,

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

WHAA All the guys that I have spoken to at PSS try and keep you away from a cluster. Here is what Microsoft recommends... Active Passive, and the cluster should do nothing else but Exchange (I know, everyone knows it - but it bears repeating). I have a cluster here (currently

RE: ADC connector for 5.5 - WAYYY OT

Hi All I'd like to make a change to Ed's famous line. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems to You're so darn stupid there is no computer powerful enough to fix you Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5

Hi all I have an unusual problem. When I access Outlook Web Access from my home machine, I can see all my emails. I can open my emails. However, if I try to reply to my emails, I hit the reply button and the window that normally allows me to reply never appears. I can type a new email, I just

RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5

the OWA part, my bad. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 What version of OWA and IE? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: DL Question

ROTFL!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DL Question It goes to email heaven Timmy. - Original Message - From: Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: Clustering Exchange

Oh Boy (Time to get on my soap box)... Reasons not to have an exchange cluster: Clustering is generally expensive Clustering is more complex than two servers Front end\ Back end configurations are more complicated Exchange cluster nodes cannot be domain controllers Exchange cluster nodes

RE: Antivirus software for exchange.

Hi there I've used NAI's Groupshield with great success. However, I wouldn't recommend Webshield. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

Hi there I have the same issue here. People have PST files that are well over a gig, and we had one person go over the 2 gig limit. No matter what we tell them, they insist that they need a mailbox over a gig. I limit them to a max of 300 megs, no matter how much crying they do. I just don't

RE: VPN breaks Outlook . Now: Mongo Netbios

This is easy Shut down your firewall, your proxy and run a straight T1 into the building. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook . Now: Mongo

RE: RBL's

OOppsss I was told it was relay black list. Sorry for the misinformation. Russell -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, if you mean I convinced you that an

RE: RBL's

Relay Black List -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Viruses via email

Hi there New York Life insurance. Thanks -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus

RE: OWA 2000 login prompt

I'm curious - why do you ask if any of the public folders are on a cluster? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards;watrust.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt No, None of the public

RE: E2K question

Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular

RE: E2K question

Wait a second If this is a test question, let us know next time. If you pulled this off a Microsoft test, you're in violation of the non disclosure you signed. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:08

RE: E2K question

Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto

RE: E2K question

. Disabling might be appropriate after the root problem were resolved. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks

RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering

Hi there I have an active\active E2k box and there is only one thing I like about it - it looks good on a resume. Here is why I am not happy with clustering Exchange: If you have a problem with email, you need to see if you have a cluster issue or Exchange issue before you can start to look

RE: SMTP connector statistics in E2k

FINALLY There is someone in the world that can truly appreciate how I feel when most users call me!! THANK YOU CTHULHU JONES!! Russell PS - Did you see the new stuffed Christmas Cthulhu yet?? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2

We're using Groupshield here with no issues. Webshield, however uugghhh Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee for the

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2

From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:40:43 -0400 We're using Groupshield here with no issues. Webshield, however uugghhh Thanks Russell

RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly

, September 30, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly The only one I've seen so far had a double extension, .HTM.SCR. -Peter -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 14:00 To: Exchange

RE: Exchange HELL

-Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange HELL I would bring up another Exchange 2000 server and move all of the mailboxes to it then blast this server and reinstall it

RE: Exchange HELL

Hi there Where are your log files? Has anyone successfully backed this machine up lately? HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange HELL I would bring up

RE: Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000 on different domains (helpl!)

Hi there One of our other divisions actually did this - they told me they used a tool from a company called NetIQ. Don't know the exact tool they used. If you need the exact name of the tool, email me offlist and I'll contact them to get all the details... HTH Russell -Original

RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly

Hello Can you tell me what extensions the virus uses?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Roger Haxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I've had two come in here so far.

RE: Message rejected

Hi All I know I'm opening myself up to getting flamed here, but I have to ask What is Friggin Lyris? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message

RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)

Hi there Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be used as a relay. Just an FYI Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Am I still a

RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)

: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Yea it can. I almost got caught in that once. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:45 PM

Mac personal folders corrupt

Hi everyone I have a user that has a MAC, using Outlook with a personal folder. The personal folder has become corrupt. I know there is a tool for fixing the file in a PC environment, but does any know about a sucvh a tool for a MAC OS?? Thanks Russell

RE: Mac personal folders corrupt

Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mac personal folders corrupt Hi everyone I have a user that has a MAC, using Outlook with a personal folder. The personal folder has become corrupt. I know

RE: IMC issues

Hi there This brings up a question I have along the same topic I see a few hundred of these on a daily basis. I can't tell you the topics because we're in mixed company. I always go in and delete them, thinking that these will take up resources trying to send out mail that will never be

RE: IMC issues

to spend your time. g M - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: IMC issues Hi there This brings up a question I have along the same topic I see a few hundred

RE: KLEZ or Sleaze

Interesting I've been seeing the same thing. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject

RE: Front-End DC

Hi there If the Front End server is in same site, make sure that it is in the same subnet. If it FE server is not in the same subnet, then you need to specify the subnet in sites and services. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: CHILD DOMAIN

Hi there Is this a mixed site?? I had a similar problem when someone installed a new site connector and set the cost to 1. I set the cost to 10, stopped and started the MTA and SMTP and I found all my outbound mail, and it was all sent. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From:

RE: OWA

Ohh This is getting too good!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Wait, Jennifer! You don't understand! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp

Outlook question

Hi everyone I have an unusual request that I cannot find an answer to. Here is my question: I have two SMTP addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to set a rule in Outlook (both 2000 and XP) that says if an email comes in for [EMAIL PROTECTED], send the email to folder a.

RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups

Hi there If I'm reading you correctly, this sounds like you should be looking at the SRS service. The reason the SRS exists is so that the 5.5 servers can see the 2000 servers. Quick things to look at: Is SRS running? Is this a regular or cluster server? Hope this points you in the right

RE: Bad Media

Hi Mike Boy, do you bring back some BAD memories for me. Look at this - with BE 8.6, what revision are you running? When I upgraded to 3878, some of my problem disappeared. Also, look at the tapes in question in BE - are you recording allot of hard errors or soft errors? Another thing you

RE: Where is everyone?

Wonderful Long Island, NY here... ...back to lurking -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm?

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

Hi there I don't know if this was mentioned (I came in late on this), but there are two things you should look at: 1) Is your Anti virus the culprit?? You may want to check processes in your task list. 2) Is someone relaying off your server?? Crank up the logging on the SMTP connector and see

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To:

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

Hi there I don't know if this was mentioned (I came in late on this), but there are two things you should look at: 1) Is your Anti virus the culprit?? You may want to check processes in your task list. 2) Is someone relaying off your server?? Crank up the logging on the SMTP connector and see

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To:

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

Hi there I don't know if this was mentioned (I came in late on this), but there are two things you should look at: 1) Is your Anti virus the culprit?? You may want to check processes in your task list. 2) Is someone relaying off your server?? Crank up the logging on the SMTP connector and see

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To:

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

Hi there I don't know if this was mentioned (I came in late on this), but there are two things you should look at: 1) Is your Anti virus the culprit?? You may want to check processes in your task list. 2) Is someone relaying off your server?? Crank up the logging on the SMTP connector and see

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To:

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

Hi there I don't know if this was mentioned (I came in late on this), but there are two things you should look at: 1) Is your Anti virus the culprit?? You may want to check processes in your task list. 2) Is someone relaying off your server?? Crank up the logging on the SMTP connector and see

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To:

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To:

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

Hi there I don't know if this was mentioned (I came in late on this), but there are two things you should look at: 1) Is your Anti virus the culprit?? You may want to check processes in your task list. 2) Is someone relaying off your server?? Crank up the logging on the SMTP connector and see

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Hi there I agree. Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a delete key on the keyboard. I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning. But the day your boss comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're on, it's worth it's weight in

RE: Exchange client problem

Hi there I know that when I create a new user, I get the error that tells me the users is not found. It does take about 15 minutes for everything to replicate. If I move a user from 5.5, it could take longer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Blank messages

Hi there I actually ran into this problem, and here is how I found out about it and fixed it: See if you can print any of these emails. If you can't see them, but you can print them out, then there is a problem with HTML emails. Here's the kicker: Outlook pulls HTML in from IE. I had one

RE: ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync

Hi there Take it from me... domains are not security zones. A domain admin from one domain can break his E2K and negatively affect your E2K. We are currently moving towards a single forest model with multiple domains, and I am so sorry we are. You have no idea how much time I've spent trying

RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley

Hi there I also mentioned to him that he is GREATLY missed on this newsgroup (as would anyone else be). Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley

RE: Can't patch Outlook View execution hole on OL2000 IE6

Hi there Usually, if the people are using a preview pane, this will happen. Have the people stop using preview panes, if that's possible. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Curious about Klez in Exchange

Hi there We were seeing about 20 to 40 a day. Since we're blocking all exes, pifs, bats, scrs, etc. there have been no problems. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Virus Question - slightly OT

Hooray!! Someone with my mentality!!! Typical phone call with this new virus: User: I got an email that says (insert something stupid or vulgar). Should I open it? Me: It doesn't sound work related. Does it have an attachment? User: Yes Me: Delete it User: Why? It might be something from my

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact

Hi there The problem is really not the virus itself (that gets stripped), but the stupid script that open Windows media player. I have my machine (Windows 2K, IE 6) fully patched and it still happens!! What a pain in the butt!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic

W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player

Hi all My boss was asking a question I'm not too sure about. If the virus is being stripped, how is it able to open Windows Media Player?? I can't seem to find an answer with either McAfee or Symantec. Thanks Russell _ List

RE: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player try the virus removal tool on his PC !!! -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM

RE: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player

windows media player According to the new edition of Woody's Office Watch IE 6 can have this vulnerability if you run Win 98 or upgraded to IE6 with minimal option. Jim -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange

RE: Offline Address Book filename

Hi there Are you talking about on the client machine (.PAB) or on the server (Folders\system folders\offline address book)?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Greatlakes, Reebdnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

FW: Offline Address Book filename - CORRECTION!!

OOPPSSS Offline address book = .OAB, Not .PAB -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:28 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Offline Address Book filename Hi there Are you talking about on the client machine (.PAB) or on the server

RE: BE 8.6

Hi Dan I know this sounds simple, but did you upgrade from BE 8.5? If so, the remote agent is different. Maybe try to reinstall the remote agent on the exchange server. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002

RE: Whatever happened to Ed?

Hi there I see him on the E2k board. Too bad he left. I agree that sometimes he could be rough, but he taught me a valuable lesson I'll never forget - look for yourself first, then ask. When I did this, his answers were polite and right on the money. Thanks Russell -Original

RE: Prep

OOh Tough crowd today. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep list suicide. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Delay Outgoing Mail

Question - What does PHB mean?? (Putting on flame retardant suit - this isn't the care-bears list ;)) Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail You

RE: Your membership on exchange has been put on hold

Hi there McAfee is the problem - why doesn't that surprise me in the least!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your membership on exchange has been put on hold

Corrupt Offline address book system folder - Help??

Hi everyone I have a problem that I can't find the answer to in either Technet or Knowledge Base. Here's the problem: About a month ago, my PDC crashed (Ex. 5.5, sp4, NT 4.0, Sp 6a). We were able to get the PDC running again. However, I just discovered that people cannot download the offline

RE: Corrupt Offline address book system folder - Help??

. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Corrupt Offline address book system folder - Help?? Importance: High Hi everyone I have a problem that I can't find the answer to in either Technet

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server

Hi Just out of curiosity, is there anything in the event viewer? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server I am running Exchage Server 5.5 SP4 on

RE: E2k Clustering

Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2k Clustering Hi there According to the MS whitepaper, here are the limits for active / active: After

RE: E2k Clustering

to provide you with high reliability failover. Active/Active is going to cause grief. Let me turn the tables, why do you think that Active/Active is better than Active/Passive? Ed -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:38 AM

RE: E2k Clustering

. This could not be done reliably on an Active/Active cluster. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: E2k Clustering Subject: RE: E2k Clustering Hi there Let me start

RE: E2K and IIS Lockdown tool

Hi there I have done it and so far I've had no problems. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K and IIS Lockdown tool Hello, I know that in the past that it was

RE: Mcafee e500

Hi there I don't know about Webshield on an E2K box, but I had problems with Webshield allowing relaying off my 5.5 box in the DMZ. I was on Spamcop and ORDB. After I removed Webshield, the problem was fixed. Once I called NAI, they told me that is the way the product is designed!! You need

RE: Best way to restrict routign\relaying in Exchange 5.5 (feedba ck please)

Hi there There is an article put out by SANS and Windows 2000 Exchange and Outlook administrator. I know these are on line for you to read. If I had the URLs handy, I would send them to you. Actually, here is a good one, although not the one I was looking for.

RE: XP on 2000 Network

Hi there I actually have XP professional at home, and I get the same thing (only username and password box). The way that I get in all the time is: domain\username password Hope this helps Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Cooking.com Replies?

Hi there Actually, this looks like glorified spam!! Pretty cute move, eh?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cooking.com Replies? Right. This is the

  1   2   >