Its occurred to me that Barry, Jim and others are true children of the
TMO, per their style of response. When someone brings up points about
the TMO regarding oddness, mundane contradictions, distortion of
facts, distortion or confused logic, a classic TMO response is to
divert the focus off the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have a similar take on this, but have you looked at the
Shastras? Phew Also, Guru Dev extols not only the Shastras but
their author, holding him to have supernatural sight.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe the author of stuff about gods dwelling in cows hairs
anymore than myths about pixies or elves. Just hand-me-down folklore,
good for kids.
I don't think a strong scientific outlook on
.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
Yes, I have a similar take on this, but have you looked at the
Shastras? Phew Also, Guru Dev extols not only the Shastras
A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first
and honest people are screwed first.
-Chanakya the author of the Shastras, one with mystical insight
Give any insight into TMO business dealings?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
One who is in search of knowledge should give up the search of
pleasure and the one who is in search of pleasure should give up the
search of knowledge.
- Chanakya
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and
/kautilya1.html#Book%20III,%
20Chapter%2013
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
no_reply@ wrote:
One who is in search of knowledge should give up the search of
pleasure and the one who is in search of pleasure should give up the
search of knowledge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
they used to smuggle cash from country to country in tablas.
ANd the reason for doing this was...
Richer sound?
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/03/D8FHR5I00.html
Amsterdam 'No Toking' Signs Being Pilfered
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Preach on, Brother. I agree with everything said below. And do feel
like much of FFL has been hijacked and taken to an entirely different
tone and tenor from what it used to be.
...
And this latter group are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you. But perhaps we've rehashed the
basic themes over so much that all we're left with
is the seemingly endless nitpicking. Who knows. Maybe
we're all exhausted ;-)
Maybe we should shut FFL down for a year,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have produced a resource of a set
of webpages offering most of the known material of Guru Dev
http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/gurudev.htm
excellent site.
It would be interesting to hear some of
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've got a direction you think it would be
interesting to explore for a while, post away...
While always a good thing, over the years, posters of new directions
and deeper, well-thought-out posts have observed
I heard MMY say (or perhaps Charlie or Jerry say that MMY said) that
all faiths would come to SBS for blessings and instructions. And being
a sat-guru, world teacher, he could teach anyone in a way that was
consistent with their faith and would help them. Muslims, Christians,
Sikhs, Buddhists all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:54 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
And if we are to believe conventional wisdom (tales from MMY), SBS
gave MMY a path for householders -- world wide. Presumably this was
not the mainstream things he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly if he had declared the money when leaving Spain, as he
would have to do when leaving the USA, there might have been a
concern about having to pay a bribe to Spanish officials at that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes but when you use the current system you are ignoring the fact
that it is and will be adjusted based on the equinoctial point which
are used to determine the seasons. The current calendar, despite it's
problems is
blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah
etc.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean
Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I checked the last 50 or so Technology
arttices in the
NYTimes. And the last 50 or so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you use your name, coward?
It always amuses me when those proclaiming they are Atman, some even
proclaiming that they Atman are the same as the Atman in all, that
Atman is Brahman -- yet get really perterbed when
@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you use your name, coward?
It always amuses me when those proclaiming they are Atman, some even
proclaiming that they Atman are the same as the Atman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 10:08 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes but when you use the current system you are ignoring the fact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 11:45 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 10:08 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps I don't get it at all, but IMO VE is always about 365
revolutions of the Earth around its axis away from the previous
VE. Precession only affects on how the starry background of the Sun
looks like at VE, or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why don't you use your name, coward?
It always
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps I don't get it at all, but IMO VE is always
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 1/31/06 8:16 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. I don't get this hostility on the Internet thing.
A basic question: can you objectively identify hostility in another, a
stranger -- someone you have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Just wanna be sure Mother Divine gets, you know, properly
serviced.
Ha-ha, calling richard gere, calling richard gere!
He says to tell
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend you get a copy of Practical Astronomy with your
Pocket Calculator which you can get used real cheap. One of the
important concepts to grok in celestial mechanics is *frames of
reference*. For example,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is in two only superficially. Though in the same
spot, tropical view puts it in Aries, and sideral view puts it in
Pisces. I think thats where you are confusing your frames.
No, I'm just assuming Tropical.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See Vaj's post about frames of reference. Somehow
you've managed to confuse at least two different ones.
I believe Vaj is referring
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
Thanks. I will explore that. Indeed I may be missing something. Yet no
one has found any factual or logic flaws in the 8 points I listed, or
explained the cites I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
Thanks. I will explore that. Indeed I may be missing something. Yet no
one has found any factual or logic flaws in the 8 points I listed, or
explained the cites I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dare I mention leap years, leap centuries and leap seconds?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe you are using two different calculational reference
points, tropical and sideral, in the same single observation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:22 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
Well, it was jumping to another set of questions from the one being
discussed. We can only answer so many questions at a time, but here
goes:
1) vernal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In tropical right? Western astrologers are the ones tooting age of
acquarius
Thus, in sideral, sun at VE will always at cusp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is in two only superficially. Though
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is in two only superficially. Though
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You appear to think tropically that the position of the sun from year
to year at the time of the vernal equinox is different from the
day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You above clarified that in your view that both points of
reference are tropical. The obsevational reference is the same.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/31/06 11:39:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A two-party system is freaky...
So your suggestion is three party system, dictatorship, monarchy?
Multi party with IRV
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:24 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
If you agree to the general overall point (regardless of small
variations and simplifications) in each of the above 8 points, it
logically follows that you agree
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You above clarified that in your view
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/31/06 11:31:27 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is one reason the democrats will be very unlikely to take
control of
the House and Senate, the democratic base is too
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm *very* clear on is that spring doesn't end up
coming in September 13,000 years hence.
And of course you know you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said:
As I suggested earlier, the day-to-day position of
the sun in the Zodiac is an entirely different frame
of reference
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1795.html
Will the equinoxes and solstices switch places in
13,000 years because of the precession of the Earth's
rotation axis?
No, there will be no swapping of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good suggestions, but I don't know about Irv, though--nice guy, but not
really the party type. :)
Sal
IRV will rock your world, Sal. :)
On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
A two-party system is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How can vernal equinox possibly be in March when in Virgo?
Have you ever thought your train is moving, when
it's actually
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Some have made large cognitive errors in reading my posts and have
interpreted The VE will be in tropical Virgo in 13000 years
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sun's position at the time of the vernal equinox
can be in Virgo without its being September.
Really? And exactly how does that work? Its September when sun is in
(tropical) virgo today. Assuming we don't change
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The sun's position at the time of the vernal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:29 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
The basic point is understanding what precession of the equinox means.
And its impacts long run such as long run weather cycles, human
migration and civilization
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:32 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
That
you could create such a fix in the future does not change my basic
points.
No, just it does not make sense to refer to something as occurring in
some
Perhaps then you could post something of interest periodically.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. You should be happy...now that I've blasted you
for being stupid in public again,
And the first time was when?
When you sold out to a paranoid fantasies in public and got embarrased
when it wasn't true. Oh, such a
And the point of knowledge you are bringing out is?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh Barry, you are sooo special, you are so unique. You are so
magnifique. You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh Barry, you are sooo special, you are so unique. You are so
magnifique. You are so much better than those dumb americans. You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the author of an early software app which calculated a number of
obscure astro. variables for observers, Dr. Pete's observation are
close for an observer on earth--approx. 1 degree every 72 years. As
you probably
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
But whatever precession has to do with proper
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Perhaps you can shed some light on the following:
Peter claims that this precession changes the orientation of
buildings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
My main question still holds. Does the orientation of a building to
the sun really change at that rate? Like pyramids, 4000 yrs / 500 is
about 8 degrees. Has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I was not making that assumption. But I was making a
different false assumption based on my trying to piece things together
from different posts. I finally did some reading. I think I got now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...but what happens when the universe implodes back into a point
singularity?
Didn't that already happen this morning?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
What will change are the time of year the vernal equinox will occur
and the position of the sun relative to constellations
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I will bet you a quart of soma that in 13000
years the vernal
equinox will be in September. Lets meet then and
see.
No. The sun moves from its lowest point in the sky
relative to the earth to its
a year
when day and night lengths are equal and when the
sun rises at true east.
What parts of my definition do you disagree with?
--- doctor_gabby_savy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I will bet you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The vernal equinox is in September in 13000 years. Its not that
complex. If you are struggling with the September vernal equinox
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The vernal equinox is in September in 13000 years. Its not that
complex. If you are struggling with the September vernal equinox
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If you have a cogent argument as to why you believe it is not,
please post. (Just saying it is eternally in March
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been an astronomy buff for 38 years and am not
confused easily. I leave it to those who know little
about the subject to be confused.
Ok good. Glad to have your experience available.
So with your knowledge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
it's always around
March 20--and then work
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
it's always around
March 20--and then work
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If you have a cogent argument as to why
The graph on this link I beleive shows a long term
(1800-2200)declining trend of the date of the vernal equinox --
consistent with the explanation for such I provided earlier.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/VernalEquinox.html
Some other links that touch on and are consistent with a
http://www.space.com/spacewatch/050318_equinox.html
More support for Vernal Equinox slowly getting earlier.
While it's true that we've traditionally celebrated the beginning of
spring on March 21, astronomers and calendar manufacturers alike now
say that the spring season starts one day
The equinoxes are not fixed points on the celestial sphere but move
westward along the ecliptic, passing through all the constellations of
the zodiacin 26,000 years. This motion is called the precession of the
equinoxes. The vernal equinox is a reference point in the equatorial
coordinate system.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell him to go visit my namesake, the town of Zutphen.
Dirk von Zutphen came to this country in 1642.
The glory of genes and family trees is that we have (an oportunity)
to purify them. Some who come from small and/or
This post is pretty funny. If not sad. Its sounded so odd that such a
major bill could pass congress and be signed without any controversy
in the media. It a major Free Speech issue.
So I checked the last 50 or so Technology arttices in the NYTimes. And
the last 50 or so articles in the
, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This post is pretty funny. If not sad. Its sounded so odd that
such
a
major bill could pass congress and be signed without any
controversy
in the media. It a major Free Speech issue.
So I checked the last 50 or so Technology
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Declan McCullagh's article on CNET one caused a stir... for only a
few days as more legal savvy tech folks dug into the law and found
that is really only covers personal emails not forums or lists or
newsgroups. So unless
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I checked the last 50 or so Technology arttices in the
NYTimes. And the last 50 or so articles in the Washington
section
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The precession of the earth's axis causes the cardinal
directions to slowly shift about 1 degree every 72
years. In moves in a circle with an arc of approx 24
degrees completing one cycle every 26,000 years.
This
means
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The precession of the earth's axis causes the cardinal
directions to slowly shift about 1 degree every 72
years. In moves in a circle with an arc of approx 24
degrees completing one cycle every 26,000 years.
This
means
While untold scads women of women across the globe undoubtly mourn
(and wail unceasingly) at the passing of Peter's peter, and its
cremation in a sacred sandlewood pyre, the event makes sense.
As most conclude early in life, particularly the fairer sex, men's
ego's are contained in their peters.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It applies to private mails not lists, newsgroups, or forums. I
already mentioned in a reply to Paul post (which for some reason hasn't
arrived on the list even though that was over an hour ago and the other
sent at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It applies to private mails not lists, newsgroups, or forums. ...
if you read
the CNET article and scroll down to the comments you'll find that a)
Declan posted a link to the wrong section of the law and b) parsing the
http://cimg.163.com/sport/2006/1/27/200601270953319a927.jpg
As we speak, Marcos Baghdatis is up a set in the Austrailian Open
(tennis) finals, against uber alpha world champion Roger Federer.
Marcos was unseated -- quite a feat to get to the finals. A superfeat
if he beats Federer -- who is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you pulled your head
out long enough to actually read some of the things
printed about Mr. Creme by those in the larger
spiritual community, you'd know that he is regarded
almost universally at best as a joke, at worst as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My, the things people do to distract attention from
the fact they've made fools of themselves in public. :-)
Which time are you referring to? It happens a lot.
Unlike you, apparently, it doesn't bother me. I love to
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
