--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My favorite was the lingum out of the mouth trick. He wasn't even
> trying on that one and everyone seemed so pleased with what he
did.
> Plus it was about a 10 on the gaydar scale!
I love watching the cro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 8/7/06 4:32 PM, Paul Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for well
> > over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true believer'.
> > But, I am
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] [was Re: Number of people learning TM ] Vaj's trap
on 8/7/06 6:41 PM, Paul Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I completely agree that if Sai Baba has made the abuses of power he
is accused of, then he deserves to be exposed. I have long sought
good clo
Quite, the expression on his face was what was taking my attention
too.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My favorite was the lingum out of the mouth trick. He wasn't even
> trying on that one and everyone seemed so pleased with what he di
My favorite was the lingum out of the mouth trick. He wasn't even
trying on that one and everyone seemed so pleased with what he did.
Plus it was about a 10 on the gaydar scale!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I completely agree that if Sai Baba
I completely agree that if Sai Baba has made the abuses of power he
is accused of, then he deserves to be exposed. I have long sought
good close-up footage of Sai handing out vibhuti, and today I have
been able to study a variety of video clips, and I am very glad for
this opportunity. Many tha
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] [was Re: Number of people learning TM ] Vaj's trap
on 8/7/06 6:03 PM, Paul Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not enter the suspicion of a conspiracy theory lightly, but
whilst trying to contact one of the women I found my email to her
being answer
A red flag for "spin" goes up, perhaps undjusifiably so, for
statements like " already known for their involvement in trying to
bring about the public ridicule of another prominent Indian."
On the surface, he sounds like quite the rogue. On second thought, do
all prominent indians deserve shieldin
I do not enter the suspicion of a conspiracy theory lightly, but
whilst trying to contact one of the women I found my email to her
being answered by someone already known for their involvement in
trying to bring about the public ridicule of another prominent Indian.
--- In FairfieldLife@yaho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ... and the stories have sounded no more clear as time has gone
> on.
To me, and this is not universal, I knew or was on courses with most
of the people in SS. To me, most were credible as people. Different
than say,
I'd be happy to revise my opinion, I am not attached one way or the
other on this subject.
Same with 'where did the TM teaching come from?', I don't have a
fixed outcome in mind for that either, though I suspect that MMY's
teachings were fairly predictably Hindu, until he got close to the
USA
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] [was Re: Number of people learning TM ] Vaj's trap
on 8/7/06 4:32 PM, Paul Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for well
over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true believer'.
B
I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for well
over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true believer'.
But, I am a firm believer about one thing at least and that is in
using proper methodology for the purposes of detection work.
The whole sex scandal story abo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > Or even by those who insist that their new belief
> > > system be well supported,
>
> People insist that others support their own personal belief systems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > > I've been told that the TBers have ruined the list. I guess no-one
> > likes to hear their NEW
> > > belief-system challenged by people who embrace
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:
> >
> > I assume Wiki would not rely on your impressions either. Since they
> > are um "piss-poor".
>
> True enough. Wikipedia requires some kind of citation for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
> wrote:
> > >
> > But perhaps Peter is correct when he
> > > suggested the problem lies in the fact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
wrote:
> >
> But perhaps Peter is correct when he
> > suggested the problem lies in the fact that the core topics about
>> TM
> > & MMY have already been dealt with,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> During the period prior to the arrival of 'TBers' from Alt.Med I
> personally preferred the level of intelligent discussions here at
> FFL. Since that time things have tended to get more 'in your face'
> (as they t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > > I usually just sa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > > I usually just say what I have to say and that's it. If there's
> > > some enjoyable or wor
During the period prior to the arrival of 'TBers' from Alt.Med I
personally preferred the level of intelligent discussions here at
FFL. Since that time things have tended to get more 'in your face'
(as they tended to be at alt.med), an attitude that militates against
confortable casual exchange
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> As aside, nothing to do with Vaj, but following up the last point
> about the impropriety of diagnosing over the internet, I wonder if
> that includes diagnosing other people's motives and states of mind.
> That wo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > I usually just say what I have to say and that's it. If there's
> > some enjoyable or worthwhile correspondence after a comment, I'll
> > add some, if I feel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, new.morning wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed himself
> >> to, and cannot now se
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I usually just say what I have to say and that's it. If there's
> some enjoyable or worthwhile correspondence after a comment, I'll
> add some, if I feel it's constructive. Otherwise I don't bother,
> esp. since this list ha
On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed himself to, and cannot now see the falsity of. Why do I say this? Simply because of his inability to respond w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
wrote:
> > In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed
himself
> > to, and cannot now see the falsity of.
> >
> > Why do I say this? Simply becau
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed himself
> to, and cannot now see the falsity of.
>
> Why do I say this? Simply because of his inability to respond when
> his postings are criticized. Inste
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >It's also sad that some people are still "burning a candle"
> > >for it all. There will a
30 matches
Mail list logo
