At 4:21 PM -0400 9/25/05, David W. Fenton wrote:
Does anyone hear any significant differences between the two? I can
convince myself that I do, but it seems only psychological.
David --
I can hear a very minor difference, but shouldn't your reasoning
include your target audience?
That
When he's right, he's right.
The only thing I would add is that iTunes (the Mac version, at least)
includes Apple Lossless, a compression technology that allows full
WAV/AIFF quality at half the size. If space is really at a premium,
you could try that (provided it's included in iTunes for
David W. Fenton wrote:
I'm about to start creating a bunch of MP3 files that are recorded
from my sound card playing back MIDI files created from Finale files.
It seems to me when comparing these two files:
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA.mp3
Chuck Israels wrote:
David,
Yes, I can hear a small difference. I know because I expected (before
reading carefully) to hear the more compressed file first and noticed a
slight veiling in the second sample.
That said, I don't think it makes a whit of practical difference in
David McKay wrote:
Hi
I'd like to purchase an easy-to-use sound recording
program, and wonder if Finale list members could give
me some advice, please.
I purchased a copy of Cool Edit 2000 only 2 years ago,
but have twice had major computer crashes which have
left me without a record of my
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand how a rest in another layer will delay the 2nd
16th-note in the first layer by 1/32nd rest, which is the desired
result. I need the sound of 16th note, 32nd rest, 3 16th notes. I
don't know how that can be done without putting the
On 26 Sep 2005 at 4:09, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
At 4:21 PM -0400 9/25/05, David W. Fenton wrote:
Does anyone hear any significant differences between the two? I can
convince myself that I do, but it seems only psychological.
I can hear a very minor difference, but shouldn't your
On 26 Sep 2005 at 5:14, Darcy James Argue wrote:
The only thing I would add is that iTunes (the Mac version, at least)
includes Apple Lossless, a compression technology that allows full
WAV/AIFF quality at half the size. If space is really at a premium,
you could try that (provided it's
On 26 Sep 2005 at 6:09, dhbailey wrote:
I find a noticeable difference in the upper partials, especially in
the viola's sound. The 192 sounds a bit richer.
I'll have to listen for that.
In my own tests to determine best encoding rates, I have found such a
tiny change between 192 and
On 26 Sep 2005 at 6:14, dhbailey wrote:
If it's to be posted on a web-site, possibly posting 2 files: the 192
file and one encoded at an even lower rate so that dial-up users could
select which one they wanted to download.
As the MP3 file is only going to ever be used on the website (if I'm
On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:05 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 2005/09/25 / 04:21 PM wrote:
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA.mp3
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA1.mp3
I put them in a spectragraph, averaged between 230' and 330'.
On 26 Sep 2005 at 11:05, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 2005/09/25 / 04:21 PM wrote:
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA.mp3
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA1.mp3
I put them in a spectragraph, averaged between 230' and 330'.
On Sep 26, 2005, at 2:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
I actually haven't tried creating an MP3
with iTunes itself to see if it made a better MP3 -- I should try it
(though I'd miss batch conversion).
iTunes for Windows doesn't have batch conversion? Are you sure, as it
is a basic part of the
David W. Fenton / 2005/09/26 / 02:22 PM wrote:
an in that regard, it's superb -- MP3s
always sound significantly better played from iTunes than from any
other player I have. I wish I knew what iTunes was doing
It's all depends on decoder.
For example, iPod had never been able to playback MP3
On 26 Sep 2005 at 19:12, Ken Moore wrote:
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand how a rest in another layer will delay the 2nd
16th-note in the first layer by 1/32nd rest, which is the desired
result. I need the sound of 16th note, 32nd rest, 3 16th notes. I
On 26 Sep 2005, at 2:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
The difficulty with using the Apple
format is that none of my audio programs would probably be able to
use it directly to write CDs or make MP3s (other than iTunes itself).
Sure, but if you need to burn to CD, you can use iTunes to convert
On 26 Sep 2005 at 14:34, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sep 26, 2005, at 2:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
I actually haven't tried creating an MP3
with iTunes itself to see if it made a better MP3 -- I should try it
(though I'd miss batch conversion).
iTunes for Windows doesn't have
On 26 Sep 2005 at 15:40, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 26 Sep 2005, at 2:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
The difficulty with using the Apple
format is that none of my audio programs would probably be able to
use it directly to write CDs or make MP3s (other than iTunes
itself).
Sure, but
Hi David,
If you have Keep iTunes Music Folder Organized checked in your
iTunes preferences, iTunes audio files are stored in: iTunes Music/
Artist Name/Album Name
By default, converted files will have the same album name and artist
name as the source files, so they will be stored in the
Lee,
made me laugh, your post;-) ... at first, that is.
But after I'd gone through the rest of the post, I'm asking myself...
First, I just wanted to be helpful. While the difference between 128
and 192 mbs certainly doesn't matter with those crap sounds, anyone
calling himself (or herself)
At 04:14 PM 09/26/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
There's a mixer in iTunes? The version I have is 4,
I had 4.9 until recently. In the lower right corner of the main
iTunes window is an icon that looks like an equalizer. It opens the
equalizer. g
and I'm not about
to upgrade to 5, given that I
On 26 Sep 2005 at 16:15, Darcy James Argue wrote:
If you have Keep iTunes Music Folder Organized checked in your
iTunes preferences, iTunes audio files are stored in: iTunes Music/
Artist Name/Album Name
Ah. I'd *never* do it that way -- subfolders like that just don't
have anything to do
view this image http://www.svp-amd.cnet.ro/diverse/finale_repeat.jpg
I want to move repeat sign after first note. It's
possible?
Thanks,
Dragos.
Finale 2006, WinXP
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On 26 Sep 2005 at 22:29, Kurt Gnos wrote:
And, David, I must confirm Lee, you don't have much of a whim of
knowledge considering manners and modern sound technology and
certainly don't know what you don't know
You have completely missed the point.
You are more interested in telling me how
On 26 Sep 2005 at 16:42, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 04:14 PM 09/26/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
There's a mixer in iTunes? The version I have is 4,
I had 4.9 until recently. In the lower right corner of the main
iTunes window is an icon that looks like an equalizer. It opens the
equalizer.
On 26 Sep 2005 at 14:29, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:05 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 2005/09/25 / 04:21 PM wrote:
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA.mp3
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/MozartK581ArrA1.mp3
I put
On 27 Sep 2005 at 0:18, Dragos Oltean wrote:
view this image http://www.svp-amd.cnet.ro/diverse/finale_repeat.jpg
I want to move repeat sign after first note. It's possible?
Finale 2006, WinXP
Well, Finale 2006 is supposed to handle this for you with a plugin. I
believe it was reported
At 05:30 PM 09/26/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
Oy, it was a couple of weeks ago when it came out that there was a
storm of complaints in one of the lists I read, because people had
downloaded and installed it and it rendered their systems unbootable.
I do see a couple of mentions on the Apple
Yes, plug-ins - Mid-Measure Repeats. It' nice.
Thanks David.
- Original Message -
From: David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] move repeat sign
On 27 Sep 2005 at 0:18, Dragos Oltean wrote:
view this
David,
ok., I appologize... I didn't understand you, as well...;-)
and I appreciate the length of your answer - kind of being taken seriously...
but... until Finale 2006 you couldn't even set panorama to a sound.
And that's much in a midi file. I would recommend to export a midi
file from
On 9/26/05, Dragos Oltean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
view this image
http://www.svp-amd.cnet.ro/diverse/finale_repeat.jpg
I want to move repeat sign after first note. It's possible?
You'll have to add an extra measure, so that there's a barline in
between the first half and the last half of that
On 26 Sep 2005 at 17:40, David W. Fenton wrote:
Now I should try using iTunes to convert and seeing if *that* sounds
different!
OK, I've done that now. The file is (all on one line):
http://www.dfenton.com/Midi/MozartK581Arr/AAM-Mozart-
ClarinetQuintet192iTunes.mp3
I *think* I hear a
On 26 Sep 2005 at 23:54, Kurt Gnos wrote:
ok., I appologize... I didn't understand you, as well...;-)
and I appreciate the length of your answer - kind of being taken
seriously...
but... until Finale 2006 you couldn't even set panorama to a sound.
Panorama? Is that different from pan?
33 matches
Mail list logo
