Dave is correct. I do this for any device that I require to use in any
sort of "service" fashion. All my PCs and all my internet addressable
devices. Especially the Flex. Not my phones, but most everything else.
Works great. My PCs and so on still use DHCP (very convenient) and yet I
can
Most older PCs will still run Windows 10. If you can get Windows 7 onto
it, you can get the free upgrade to 10 and your IEEE card is probably still
supported.
If all else fails, you can run that computer "headless" (look into
something called "TightVNC" to run your old machine remotely from a
Excellent!
In addition, anyone interested in this should reach out to the larger
non-Flex community. As I recall, several devices (Softrock, etc.) operated
with PowerSDR as well. There are also several receive only devices out
there these days that run off of other open source SDR software. It
Fred. another thing you might try is another engine. If you don't already
have it, you could try Fldigi, which is (as I recall) a free download. you
need to obtain a special XML file for the Flex to configure it (just google
for it). But, it is otherwise a relatively straightforward exercise.
Use what you wish, but I have done very well with inexpensive computer
speakers. Use the type that have a headphone input that cuts off the
speakers (usually available even on the cheapest ones). I use inexpensive
headphones also. Flex allows me to equalize however I like anyway.
WO7R
On
I don't see the problem here. We got years of upgrades that _no other ham
radio received whatsoever_.
You really can't expect life time dancing lessons for one low fee. No
hardware/software product in any market works like that. I spent decades
in the software business and I never saw that
Only if you need a firmware change. Without looking at the code, this
should not ordinarily be hard. Remember, too, that the software supported
many brands of radios, including receive-only rigs like the softrocks. So,
a lot of the firmware clearly behaves like most firmware -- it does things
Free means nothing if nobody does the maintenance/enhancements.
The question has always been who will do this?
I really think this is not very likely to come from Flex; they have bet big
on the 6000 series and have moved their resources (very predominantly if
not entirely) to that platform. If
I have been getting random garbled transmit on RTTY only. Regular SSB and
RTTY seem fine.
v 2.7.2 Power SDR
4.13 VAC
I am pretty convinced this is software.
Larry WO7R
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Dave Gomberg da...@sfwcf.com wrote:
Ooops, I lied. This morning the problem is back
I also recommend WSJT-X instead of WSJT.
There is still difficulty setting up VAC (I finally, after some help here
and some struggles, got the interrupt parameters right) but I would suggest
that WSJT-X itself is easier and somehow more forgiving. It also dispenses
with the manual port number
-radio.biz] On Behalf Of
Larry
Loen
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 5:06 PM
To: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] VAC decides to force a few parameters and just like
that, JT65 and JT9 stop working
I had taken a while to stumble through the instructions ofr getting JT65
and JT9 going
I had taken a while to stumble through the instructions ofr getting JT65
and JT9 going. But, a couple weeks back, I had finally done so.
Yesterday, it stopped working. The reason seems to be, no matter what I
do, it has somehow re-defaulted everything and it won't let me change
anything, even
OK, a while back, I discovered that there is a satisfactory solution for
the basic power up / power down of the Flex 6300.
Now the question is, exactly what do I need for a complete solution?
I presume that having it internet addressable simplifies things, but
exactly what is needed for the
The one thing not 100 per cent clear is whether you can skip from version 1
to version (say) 4. I presume one can, it's the most consistent way to
read what they say, but the policy I read doesn't say so outright.
Larry WO7R
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Patrick Greenlee
I'm interested and concerned about the ability to run the 6000 series
remotely.
For reasons I won't bore you with, lack of a really good remote power
on/off capability -- such as Elecraft unquestionably has for 6300 scale
money -- may be a deal breaker for this long time Flex owner as far as the
Thanks, Matthew. The real question here is not that part of it, but power
control. I don't want to leave the radios on all the time and (in fact) I
want to be able to sequence the power on sequence however I require it to
be done, now or in the future.
With the Flex 5000, particularly it's
Larry WO7R (ex WO0Z)
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base:
FireBrick wrote:
Spent 3 hours calling the TX5C on 30 rtty last night
Big pileup, calls I've never seen before in any DX pile or contest.
This morning they came on again, and I was able to use the panadaptor to spot
what I thought was a station he worked.
Dragged the blue vfob there and
Don wrote:
I am using the 5000A and I inserted the key into the key jack of the
5000A. It is a stereo 1/4 for the iambic key. The problem I am
experiencing is in iambic mode it is very erratic to the point it is
unusable. Per the manual I have primary set to 5000, secondary set to
cat,
Another big win for the Flex 5000.
I was in the big 80 meter Ducie pileup, not scoring, but hearing both
ends of at least the US QSOs (using dual receive, naturally, but it
_was_ a 25 KHz split).
Then, the spot came up for TI9. Ran over to 40 and snagged _it_ on the
second call (I'd worked
So, after composing the last note, I decided to try 40m SSB for Ducie.
Some South American talking right on his frequency, but it doesn't matter.
Second call.
This rig is _hot_.
Larry Wo0Z
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
Jim, W4ATK wrote:
I regularly use VCOM and VAC with MixW and PowerSDR. I have had no trouble
with any of the various versions of Power SDR with either my SDR-1000 or my
Flex-5000A.
MixW is set as follows:
CAT - Kenwood
Model - All Kenwoods
PTT and CAT Interface
COM5 @19200, 8 bits,
OK, so we're supposed to be suffering from the sunspot minimum and
there's no DX to be had.
Really? In what for me is pretty casual operating, I did manage to make
DXCC with the Flex 5000. I know I'm not the first -- some of the
contesters on this list have managed it in a weekend near as I
Jim Rogers, W4ATK wrote:
Hi Neal,
When I am using MixW, the shift key swaps the macro buttons, so all the
buttons go blank. Sometimes they stay that way. Otherwise releasing the
shift key puts everything back again. Just a little bothersome when you are
typing to see the macros
FireBrick wrote:
I can't transmit with a dial freg of 3.500.560 cw
Unless my math is wrong...
I should be able to work the guys in the contest at that freq.
(couple of good DX multipliers there)
That's not that close to the edge.
I have to move dial to 3.500.760 before the PWSDR will put
Thanks to one and all who had me check out the cable. It was indeed the
cable.
Removing the covers on the rig is covered in a knowledge base article I
was pointed at. Once done, I had to get one of those star type
screwdrivers and after that, a cautious remove of the fan on the bottom
I am also having trouble with PTT, but exclusively on phone.
This is with my shiny new Heil Microphone purchased from Flex. I have
never gotten SSB (or AM) to work with my Flex 5000 -- the microphone was
purchased to get it going.
At first I thought the Mic might have a problem.
So, I took
The easiest way to hook up both is to run different versions of the
PowerSDR software.
That's what I did.
For instance, why not run 1.10.2 for the SDR 1000 and 1.10.3 for the
Flex 5000?
It's easy and workable without a lot of complexity. You give up a
little bit on the one running
Phil LaMarche wrote:
Also wanted to mention that I am taking audio out of the back to a 100 watt
amplifier and then to good bookcase speakers mounted on the wall and pointed
down at me. Just wonderful audio and easy listening and absolutely no
fatigue.
Thank you Flex.
Phil
That's a
FireBrick wrote:
I'm chasing C52C on 17 rtty right now.
I've often chased dx stations operating split
But I think this is the first time I was able to copy both sides of the
split at the same time.
Wonderful.
But, as you relate, MultiRX isn't usually compatible with RTTY. I find
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am planning to use the F5K remotely. I have the DLI ethernet power switch but
the blue button must be pushed to turn it on and off. Is there a way around
it?
Thanks,
Art W8IKN
__
This has been a
As of right now, I am thoroughly broken on RTTY. I think it is because
we implemented some fixes to make RTTY contesters happy.
1.10.2 worked fairly well, but actually was partly broken for PSK. I
didn't run it long enough to sort it all out, but I could make it work
without too much fuss.
Eric Wachsmann wrote:
From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 4:15 PM
To: Eric Wachsmann; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Definition of F5K control interface, MIDI, FWC
class,API?
Is there a
FireBrick wrote:
But I swear the sound channels are reversed.
I was trying to listen split, and finally did the Audio Balance test.
But I left sound is in right earphone and vice versa.
Anybody else expericing this is do I have a setting wrong?
SDR5Ka svn1652
Listening on a Heil
Harold Aaron wrote:
Hi folks. Today I managed to get WriteLog behaving with the Flex-5000. I
believe Mark, NU6X mentioned earlier that click tuning a RTTY signal tunes
to center frequency, not the Mark frequency. Confirmed that today and was
wondering if there is any prognosis for a fix in
I don't see a bug report for this, but don't want to submit one until I
am more certain.
Sometimes, when keying on 1.10.2 and CW (actual key) I am getting a
sticky effect where the element repeats until I tap the keys. I
suppose there's a small chance the key itself is defective (though I
After some suitable clowning around with the new rig, I cracked the
Burundi DXpedition on 40 meters just now (still using the HF2V).
An all time new one for me. The new amplifier hookup/setup helped even
though I wasn't running a full KW or anything of the sort. More like
150 watts maybe.
Need to brag a tiny bit.
Got my Flex 5000A running with newly purchased VAC.
Physical setup was a dream.
The only headache was, turning on CW via MixW caused some weird
side-effect, killed CW functionality via the CWX or standard key. Once
I shut that off, so that MixW was RTTY only, all was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This process in how orders are prioritize seems bizarre to me.
Compared to, say, the iPhone, I'm extremely happy with how the whole 5K
thing was handled.
I got a loyalty discount for ordering early (instead of getting
hammered with a higher price) and I got my
A lot of people, from time to time, express concern about open source.
There is no reason to express such concerns and the record that _already
exists_ proves it.
Compare, for instance, the PowerSDR console to, say, MixW. MixW is a
nice piece of software I use every single day, just like
Rob Dennison wrote:
Service? Who wants to pay a bunch for service.
If it is done right, I do. One reason I've bought two radios so far.
Larry Wo0Z
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Bob Tracy wrote:
That is by design. I'd rather have it that way than coming back up in the
phone band and have split set to the CW previous frequency.
Bob K5KDN
-Original Message-
I agree with the design. Nothing worse than powering off the rig,
switching antennas, turning the
FlexRadio KB Admin wrote:
Please refer to the KB article on how to pick a Firewire host controller,
Selecting High Performance Firewire Cards for FlexRadio Transceivers
http://kb.flex-radio.com/article.aspx?id=10250
-Tim
FRS KB Administrator
That link in the article to the Syba product
Tim Ellison wrote:
In actualality, the recently added enhancement #1114 submitted by Mark,
NU6X really needs to be modified to request FSK mode support in PowerSDR
rather than modifying the behavior of DIGIu and DIGIl modes, which is
essentially correct for ASFK. I think this would satisfy all
Tim Ellison wrote:
Neil, your prediction will, unfortunately probably come true.
Your concern was debated before the FlexWire physical connector was
selected. In the end, the decision was made to use a 9-pin d-sub
connector (that is used for serial connections, but not exclusively),
but
Jim Lux wrote:
[snip]
I think FedExKinkos has pricing that's kind of out of whack here. (And
it's well nigh impossible to figure out what the price is.. it's
certainly NOT on their website anywhere)
Jim
What I'm trying to point out, here, is that out of whack is no
surprise. And,
Bob McGwier wrote:
Brian:
What is happening is MixW is changing the radio's mode from DigU to USB
and you have VAC enable in digital modes checked in your setup box.
This is VERY aggravating. We need Bob to make a change to CAT: If we
are in DigU and we are told to go to USB, we lie
Skip K3CC wrote:
Guys I can't let this go by,
Can we all avoid this particular discussion _here_?
There's plenty of other forums available to cover this.
Have a heart, I only got so much e-mail space from my ISP!
Larry WO0Z
___
FlexRadio
John P Basilotto W5GI wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Basilotto W5GI
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:51 PM
To: Reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] (no subject)
Importance: High
There are currently no pictures available of the 5000. We expect to
Those of you who used to read my blogs on the forums know that I
update folks on my progress with the SDR from time to time.
Today, I crossed a long awaited threshhold. I worked DXCC on 30
meters. In my customary fashion, this was not done with a great tower,
Yagi, and (of course) on 30
Larry Menzel wrote:
Hello, fellas.
New user here, and I'm interested in setting my Flex up for CW keying.
The manual suggest connecting the key to a serial port for lowest latency,
which I'm looking for, of course,
Can someone please instruct me how to interface my paddle or keyer to the
As to the question of laptops, the cited machine is probably OK.
I have an aging Celeron laptop at 1.5 GHz which works marginally well
for SDR use with the Extigy soundcard.
I did not buy it for SDR useage either, but it manages to do the job
when I ask it to. Just. There are occassional
With at least the 1.8.0 level, there's a little glitch I've noticed that
might also be related to another recent thread.
Sometimes, when I've just turned the rig on, I find the receive is
attenuated an extra 20 dB or so somehow. It actually looks, visually,
like a good deal, because the noise
Frank Mayer wrote:
Larry,
I have noticed the same thing here on and off. It seems to be some
kind of issue in the communications line (Parallel port of SDR-1000 to
the computer). Not everybody seems be experiencing it. My switching
the preamp positions also will bring the receive back
I have also used this board. I haven't used all of the options on it,
but I have already gotten great value from it.
Great for HFers.
Larry WO0Z
Mike Naruta wrote:
Wally, I really like the Poor Man's UCB that
I received from you. It it a very nice solution
for connecting to the SDR-1000.
Paull wrote:
I believe that this has been hinted at over the years, but forgive please
for asking the obvious...How about a software defined calibrator built
into sdr code?
I do not understand the need to purchase an external calibration source when
all the required components/functions
Jerry Flanders wrote:
At 07:34 PM 2/2/2007, FireBrick wrote:
...
My Dell 3.2 mHz machine has one com port (presently used to control my
antenna rotor).
...
Questions:
1: I would need the USB to Parallel Adapter Y/N
Consider adding a card to give you serial/paralel ports. Maybe
Bill W5WVO wrote:
I've been reading this board for a few weeks now, trying to decide if this is
way I want to go for a new transceiver. I plan to use it with transverters
primarily for VHF CW/SSB, but also on HF CW/SSB. Maybe digital modes later.
Receive dynamic range is of the highest
Mark Amos wrote:
The Flex-Radio, on the other hand, was pretty much unuseable when the
transmitter amp were running. It saw every dit from that transmitter out to
dozens of KHz's away - spurs popping up and drowning out even S9+ stations.
I've never operated in a high RF environment before, so
Alan NV8A wrote:
A while back I tried PowerSDR 1.6.2 on my old 850MHz PIII notebook with
512MB RAM and an Extigy Sound device and ran it with the sample .WAV
files. It seemed pretty good and I started thinking about possibly
getting an SDR-1000 or its successor, although I was warned that that
Larry W8ER wrote:
I change frequently from AM to SSB. The amplifier is tuned differently
with each mode. I use an Ameritron AL-80B. On SSB I tune to about 1 KW
output and that takes about 60 watts of drive. On AM I tune for a max of
about 600 watts and that takes drive of about 40 watts (150
Philip Theis wrote:
I used the SDR-1000 in last weekends contest and was very disappointed in
the operation of the Virtual Serial Cable. It was constantly losing it's
connection between the logging software and the SDR.
The most I have had to do in a long time is bring up Setup on the SDR
Brief moment of bragging (and thanks).
Just got the Burkina Faso DXpedition on 30 meters with PSK31 on MixW
2.16 and 1.8.0.
It was the first time I'd tried digital with 1.8.0 and I got the DX just
before he shut down on that frequency and mode. The new power limits
may well have made the
Jim Lux wrote:
At 06:41 AM 1/7/2007, K0MV wrote:
Those of you who have Tivo boxes will recognize this.
The feature is a continuous recording of the last 5 minutes of the
received signal. You can rewind and go back to see if you copied that
DX callsign correctly, or maybe try a narrower
John wrote:
You can run 40 watts continuous power as measured by a Bird Wattmeter. I
recommend you use an external accurate meeting to determine actual power
output. The SDR built-in meter is not very accurate at lower power settings.
John P. Basilotto
Marketing/Sales/Product Manager
FlexRadio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CQ Flexers.
We need your input to help new Flexers reach optimum performance as soon as
possible.
This is probably a good moment to mention an interesting finding based on
my operating experiences.
I have taken advantage of 1.8.0 to customize the width of all of
Jim Lux wrote:
At 04:00 PM 1/2/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
On 1/2/07, James Courtier-Dutton
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Microsoft Word's equation editor, reviewing, and cross
referencing capabilities a lot, and open office is incompatible for
some reason. I
The other, not quite so obvious alternative to Linux would be to support
XP, only, for as long as we can.
This is not as strange an idea as it looks. It may be that we aren't
the only ones unwilling or unable to enter this brave new world of
optimizing everything for the record industry.
Brian Kassel wrote:
Hi Jim:
Thanks for the note. Let's see if I can describe to you what I
see. After even a short transmission of, say, 5 seconds, running
something like 5W, the frequency of the received PSK-31 signal slowly
moves to the left on the waterfall display of my MixW program
is required
than the typical 20 or 22A capacity version.
Brian K7RE
Larry Loen wrote:
Well, thanks for trying. Sorry it wasn't a magic bullet for you. It
was worth a shot anyway.
Larry WO0Z
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex
Year's end leads to reflection and mine makes me want to say thank
you to all who participate in making this product better. Especially
as not a few of the changes that came into the product were things that
I specifically asked for and have now received. And more changes that I
should
ChasW3KC wrote:
To my mind a barefoot SDR is the one watt rig.
Is that a reasonable assumption?
I wonder because working DX is, of course, quite a bit
easier at the 100 watt level.
73 Chas W3KC
If it was one watt, I'd have said QRP.
Traditionally, 100 watts is barefoot.
And, yes, 100
John Sweeney wrote:
One thing I have noticed after owning the SDR-1000 for 3 months , I receive
much better than my getting out on transmit. Not unusual at all to copy
the other station rock solid, no problems, but they say heavy QRM or QRN/
QSB, rough copy. (they are also using about
Double Da!!
There is way too much attention paid to S meters. I'm glad that ours is
accurate (or, more properly, can be made so), but unless you're trying
to do a serious scientific experiment in propagation, which requires
calibrated S meters _on both ends_ just for starters, it doesn't mean
Robert McGwier wrote:
Frank and I are at GnuRadio Hackfest. I doubt anyone who knows us would
categorize us as anything but techno-geeks. We are constantly looking
at the lastest technology (we are about to have an OFDM system running
in GnuRadio for example) that could be of benefit to
Jim Lux wrote:
I see three scrubbed messages (one apparently, but not really, from
me) that have a subject of price.
There was apparently a .zip file attached.
Larry and Guiseppe also seem to have been spoofed as well.
I'm not sure what all happened on my end. My ISP filtered the messages
A.R.S. - W5AMI wrote:
It seems like I've seen some discussion on this before, but I could
not find it in the archives.
Once in a while when I power up my SDR, the X2 will activate the key
line to my AMP or external TX, etc. I have no idea why it would do
this.
I have had similar symptoms,
Jim, W4ATK wrote:
I upped my sound card smaple rate on PowerSDR to 96000 for CW.
Everything
worked fine on CW and PSK31. But, there is an intermittent problem that
frequently occurs. When running PSK31, the waterfall on MixW will
occassionaly disply 1/2 spectrum width and MixW quits
Eric Wachsmann wrote:
No license issues. We just have it tucked away. You can find it at the
following link (for now):
http://flex-radio.com/Download/Software%20Download/Software%20Archive/SDR1.6
.1%20Source.zip
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
Thanks!!
Larry WO0Z
Larry Taft wrote:
Namesake,
I squint at my PMUCB and pronounce: With the board plugged into the
SDR-1000 the LED is up, the PTT from the foot sw is left connector
toward the BNC RF output jack, amp output is middle and mute from
elsewhere is right toward the parallel connector. This is
Willi Reppel wrote:
Jeff,
One possible cure to avoid said jiggling and twisting of the plugs is to
drill larger holes into the backplate of the SDR1000 enclosure. The
relatively small holes may prevent certain types of male plugs to reach the
bottom of the female connectors. Gold-plated plugs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dan,
The Janus board (hpsdr.org) has a jumper selectable 15dB attenuator fitted to
its input so the board can be used with an existing SDR1000. The attenuator
can be taken out of circuit and the input connected directly to the A/D
converter on the card for optimum
Jim Lux wrote:
At 07:48 PM 9/24/2006, Larry Loen wrote:
David Ackrill wrote:
Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
I've thought long and hard about this note.
I believe the main issue here is simple -- while the software has
improved by leaps and bounds, we have only the most modest changes
Gerald Capodieci wrote:
I strongly suggest we get the software be settled before the hardware
is touched.
IMHO, no, if Flex wants to go in a direction anything like this, the
software team needs to understand exactly what this is going to be as
soon as possible.
If it is as I suggest it,
David Ackrill wrote:
Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
I agree with the issue of the complaint, but not the tone.
73, Guy K2AV.
I'm sorry if my tone seems abrasive, I admit that I tend to state my
opinions and point of view in few words.
Tha fact is, I want to like the SDR1000 and,
J. Crit Harley, MD, C.Ht. wrote:
2. The parallel port connection is not working at all. Some setting
must be wrong.
* I did connect up my printer and it printed a perfect test page.
* Computer says my printer is on LPT3and the I/O are DF00, DF07
and DE00, DE07.
A.R.S. - W5AMI wrote:
I think if you can get the parallel port working properly, your
problems will go away. If your new port is LPT3, the address needs to
be 3BC, not 378. Change that in PowerSDR before turning on the rig.
You might even change it, exit PowerSDR, then start it back up. Also
Rick Markey, KN3C wrote:
An excellent question. As a lurker and SDR wannabe, I've been following
the reflector for some time. Granted, the reflector is for the discussion
of problems, but for someone considering the purchase of an SDR, it is easy
to draw the conclusion that the software is
Rick Markey, KN3C wrote:
[snip]
Is
there a release of software that allows the system to be as reliable as an
off-the-shelf box, ignoring the performance issue for the moment. It
doesn't seem to make sense to have a high performance radio if it doesn't
work reliably.
de Rick, KN3C
I
Anyone else hearing what I'm hearing? It really does sound different to
me, at least.
Did something else change? Shapes of the skirts on the filters?
Default noise blanking settings? I have long simply taken the
defaults on all this stuff and it never did me wrong.
I used 1.4.5 for a
Just trying out SVN 665 (thanks W5AMI for the zip).
I've turned conservative of late, sticking to the official releases
only. I've simply let all the recent betas kind of wash over me,
undiscovered.
Wow.
A great deal of what I had been asking for has been implemented
(particularly the
With a bit of a heavy heart, I've decided NOT to take the SDR with me on
this year's vacation / DXpedition.
The shacks I'm going to are fully equipped. What with instant changes
to the airline regulations these days, especially right now, I'm just
not going to risk being told I have to put my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like bootleg to me. I won't buy a pre-loaded system unless it
comes with the original media.
73,
Dan KB5MY/6 DM13nc
The only thing that is critical, on Windows, is if it has a certificate
of originality. That is to say, a sticker with the unique code and
John Basilotto W5GI wrote:
I need to clarify Flex's position.
A mic preamp is not required to operate the SDR1000-there is sufficient gain
included in the software to run just about any low level microphone. We
have not done a good job of documenting the various procedures to achieve
the
Tim Ellison wrote:
Larry,
I understand your reasoning and the materials list below is a good one,
but let's be a little more real world in the pricing and required
components. The box actually has to run the PowerSDR software to be
functional. This would be, as I assume, a second box dedicated
Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio wrote:
Alan,
A notebook 1GHz+ with the Extigy will work. However, it will not have
the same dynamic range as our recommended cards provide. In short, the
legacy cards (Extigy, MP3+, Santa Cruz, Audigy 2 ZS) will work in terms
of being able to receive and transmit.
Sami Aintila wrote:
Peter,
I am seeing all kinds of nasty crud around DC, and so are many other
SDR-1000 users. On some systems - maybe with some sound cards - maybe
with better grounding - the problem is not very prominent. But for
optimal (receiver) performance it's always safer to operate at
khmlist wrote:
Hi!
When I started v1.6.1 for the first time a DOS windows run some
calibration for several min before any other screen. What was that? Have
not seen that before. Could not see anything in the release rev. about it.
rgds Kjell la6xj
It is called FFT Wisdom and optimizes the
inspections wrote:
[snip]
Seems the SDR1000k isnt a good enough radio ? I'm sure the hardware
guys would take exception to the need for a new radio to make it
useable ??
How many of us need full qsk anyway?? my CW would be classed as good by
any measure but I still make contacts that
Dan Hammill wrote:
[snip]
I am also patiently waiting for the UCB project to spring back to life, for
I also have a strong desire to build a 50 thru 1296 (or higher) contest
setup based on a SDR-1000 IF. No use in buying more transverters if the
control hardware isn't available - nor do I
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
