Hi,
I use the same inputstream for a FOP configuration to PDF and one to
PostScript.
The inputstream contains a Euro sign (?).
In the PDF it is shown, in the PostScript it isn't printed.
Is this a known issue or did I configure something wrong?
--
Thanks for any and all help,
Geoffrey
Geoffrey wrote:
Hi,
I use the same inputstream for a FOP configuration to PDF and one to
PostScript.
The inputstream contains a Euro sign (?).
In the PDF it is shown, in the PostScript it isn't printed.
Is this a known issue or did I configure something wrong?
The most likely reason is that you
On 22.06.2004 11:18:27 Renzo Callant wrote:
Problem solved. I removed the check from PSStream.java.
I do wonder why this check was in the code.
I've explained, haven't I?
Can this be left out in a future release ?
Yes, I've just disabled it in CVS HEAD.
Jeremias Maerki
The Euro sign is not so old. It was hacked in a few years ago. Whether
you can produce the Euro sign depends on the font having the Euro glyph
available. If you generate a PostScript file from fonts.fo in FOP
0.20.5's examples/fo/basic directory I get the Euro sign when I view it
inside a recent
Hi all,
Im trying to render a PostScript file with
FOP.
But i get the following error :
[DEBUG] rendering areas to PostScript
[INFO] [1]
[DEBUG] Last page-sequence produced 1 pages.
[INFO] [2]
[ERROR] PostScript Command exceeded limit of 255 characters
Uh oh. My fault. You hit a bug. This happens in
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSStream.java. I think I read somewhere that a
single line of PostScript code shouldn't contain more than 256
characters. That's probably why I wrote that check. But unfortunately, I
can't find the reference anymore.
A work
Hello !
I modified PSRenderer and that functions!!!
Thank you very much!
-Message d'origine-
De : Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 13 janvier 2004 22:51
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: RE : renderer postscript : border painting
Salut Philippe
I haven't
Salut Philippe
I haven't had time, yet, to run the debugger, but I think it's pretty
obvious now what going wrong. If you look that PostScript file you sent
me in a text editor you can see that there is a line 1.0 1.0 1.0
setrgbcolor at the beginning of page 1 which is missing on page 2.
You can
FOP 0.20.5
in postscript generation I encounter an problem
it's a document with many tables, there are invisible
border
on the 1st page the border are invisible
it's OK,
but on the following pages, the border are painting !
known problem?
a solution?
Not a known problem (or I forgot about it). Please post a small sample
FO document that shows the problem. I may be able to point you to the
right place in PSRenderer.
On 09.01.2004 09:37:06 Philippe PITHON wrote:
FOP 0.20.5
in postscript generation I encounter an problem
it's a document
As a workaround you can use GhostScript to convert the PDF files to
PostScript. The EPS files will processed correctly this way.
On 03.12.2003 09:24:57 Krister Wicksell Eriksson wrote:
I'm trying to get the cid-fonts.fo example working with ps output but get the
error.
[WARNING] Only
thanx, works really fine! suse
- Original Message -
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: problem with postscript (landscape)
Hi suse
Check this out:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
hello @ all!
I've implemented the page-height and page-width in my stylesheet to produce
a postscript-file which orientation is landscape. but if I open it with
ghostview portrait is shown. is it a issue of fop or a bug of gs?
thanx suse
Hi suse
Check this out:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21307
This may do what you need.
On 17.09.2003 21:47:56 suse wrote:
I've implemented the page-height and page-width in my stylesheet to produce
a postscript-file which orientation is landscape. but if I open
I am having a problem where data put into the region-start of a document
does not get rendered using the postscript renderer (every other part of the
document seems fine). The same xml file/xsl-fo combo works for PDF output. I
require a formatted document to go straight to the printer (using Java
-Original Message-
From: Yeung, Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am having a problem where data put into the region-start of a document
does not get rendered using the postscript renderer (every other
snip/
Is this a limitation in the Postscript renderer?
snip/
PS Renderer
This currently documented as being unsupported.
Does anyone know if there are future plans to allow embedding of fonts with the
postscript
renderer, and if so when?
Thanx
Want to chat instantly with your online friends
Hi! Sorry for cross posting this subject to XSL-FO
Mailing List at YahooGroups.
Here is my question again:
We are having trouble getting a complete postscript
file out of FOP.
The text renders correctly but the symbol font used
for bullet-lists is not shown.
We are using hexcode #x2022; to get
We're going the opposite route. We generate a PDF from FO, then convert it
to postscript. We're using Neevia to automate the process.
-Original Message-
From: Claes Sandberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Symbol font
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A bugfix is in CVS now.
snip/
Thanks Jeremias, thats Excellent news.
Chris
_
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
happens because the DCTDecode
filter stops working after encountering the EOI marker. Because there is
still some data unprocessed and because of the way images are currently
written to PostScript this leads to an error.
I'm currently figuring out how best to solve this. I'm looking at the
code from
A bugfix is in CVS now.
On 01.07.2003 16:21:50 Chris Bowditch wrote:
I'm having trouble with Postscript generated by FOP 0.20.5rc3a. I have a
document containing some JPEG images. The postscript file is produced
without error with -d option specified. However, both Adobe Distiller
On 02.07.2003 11:06:35 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Thanks for the update Jeremias. I would be grateful if you could shed any
light on this.
One thing I dont understand is what is different about the JPEG files I am
using, compared to the ones you mentioned that you used in testing (in past
Hi All,
I'm having trouble with Postscript generated by FOP 0.20.5rc3a. I have a
document containing some JPEG images. The postscript file is produced
without error with -d option specified. However, both Adobe Distiller and
Ghostview fail to open the Posctscript. This is the output from
Could you send a sample fo and jpeg image?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JPEG images in Postscript
Hi All,
I'm having trouble with Postscript generated by FOP 0.20.5rc3a. I have
(out);
if (!(img instanceof JpegImage)) {
That makes the generated files a bit bigger, but at least they work.
On 01.07.2003 16:58:17 Chris Bowditch wrote:
thanks for your quick reply. I have attached the fo and two images to this
e-mail. Looking at the generated postscript
Most probably, yes. It's a bug that only surfaces with a handful of
files. That's probably the reason why it didn't come up before.
On 01.07.2003 17:23:38 Clay Leeds wrote:
On 7/1/2003 8:18 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Almost suspected itI believe it's a bug in the ASCII-85 encoder
which
Correction: I've just dropped my current ASCII85OutputStream in the
maintenance branch but the bug persists. There's must be another one.
Will investigate.
On 01.07.2003 17:18:20 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Almost suspected itI believe it's a bug in the ASCII-85 encoder
which I've fixed in the
Hi
all,
I've tried to insert
a multipage postscript document into a pdf-document(via external-graphic)
but the result looks not as expected (only one side was rendered and the
different pages are overdrawing each to the other).
I'm afraid that the
feature isn't implemented now
That's really a new use case, you know. And external-graphic is not
really suited to do that at all. Please tell us what exactly you need to
do. Are you trying to do some kind of PS2PDF/Distiller thing? Do you
want to append a few pages from a PostScript file to a PDF you're
generating with FOP? I
Hi Jeremias...
I use FOP among other things to create customer proofs for advertisements
sold by our system.
Now we've to implement selling of double-sided display ads (yellow pages
etc...).
The Advertisements are stored in postscript format (also the multipage ads).
Now the proof now
As I said, external-graphic is not suited to display multi-page images.
The behaviour of layouting multi-page images is not defined in the spec.
If the PostScript pages are the only content on a page and you use FOP
to basically print a header page only, then you could distill your PS
file to PDF
The last one sounds good...
Any other Idea (don't know whether it works):
I've tried to distill the postscript file by GhostScript and the result
looks good.
It creates a pdf site for each postcript page.
Can I append/insert the created pdf into the original one, created by FOP?
cu and ThanX
On 17.06.2003 13:47:58 Torsten Erler wrote:
The last one sounds good...
Any other Idea (don't know whether it works):
I've tried to distill the postscript file by GhostScript and the result
looks good.
It creates a pdf site for each postcript page.
Can I append/insert the created pdf
Ok Thanx Jeremias, U'r suggestions were very helpful for me.
cu Torsten
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 13:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: multipage postscript files
On 17.06.2003 13:47:58 Torsten Erler
Using Ghostscript you can merge 2 or more pdf files.
- Original Message -
From: Torsten Erler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: multipage postscript files
Ok Thanx Jeremias, U'r suggestions were very helpful for me.
cu Torsten
Really good and simple pointer (I haven't tried it with multiple input for
pdfwriter!)
ThanX it works ;)
-Original Message-
From: Leonid Kleiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 15:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: multipage postscript
could be related to the fact that it's
the only feature that uses PostScript Level 3 code which may not be
available on your printer. Does it work when you open the PostScript
file in GhostView?
No, it does not work either. And I'm pretty sure that the printer is
Level 3 capable, but I'm
suited as EPS or SVG anyway if you ask
me.
On 04.06.2003 14:34:35 Jan Bernhardt wrote:
I want to use the Postscript renderer for regular report printing.
Unfortunately there are a few glitches which keep from doing so: JPEGs (at
least the ones I tried) cause range errors and the Euro sign
Hi,
I want to use the Postscript renderer for regular report printing.
Unfortunately there are a few glitches which keep from doing so: JPEGs (at
least the ones I tried) cause range errors and the Euro sign doesn't print due
to wrong charset mapping.
The first problem can be resolved
. Help is always welcome.
The problem with character set encodings should be fixed in CVS.
Good to hear, I'm gonna check this out.
The problem with JPEG images could be related to the fact that it's
the only feature that uses PostScript Level 3 code which may not be
available on your printer
Hi there,
has anyone got an example on how
to implement PCL and/or Postcript printing
directly to a printer in a
servlet using FOP? Couldn´t find anything like it.
Thanks in advance for any
help
Normen
Hi there,
has anyone got an example on how to implement PCL and/or Postcript printing
directly to a printer in a servlet using FOP? Couldn´t find anything like
it.
Yepp
OutputStream out = null;
//IP-Stream Printing
if( iPPrinting)
{
Socket s = new Socket( printerName, printerPort );
Ethan,
I don't know if you monitor fop-dev but Zhong(George) Yi has sent a
bugfix and I've just applied it to CVS (maintenance branch). The thing
looks better now. You may want to try again.
On 09.05.2003 17:02:18 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I was able to reproduce the problem. So you are creating
:-(
I hope the next version of this IPP Client(v2) will be better :-)
Thank you for your help and suggestions.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
On 12.05.2003 14:06
.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
On 09.05.2003 18:26:11 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
fo:external-graphic src=someimage.png blah blah/
Does it have
I first tried to render an image into PDF with the PDFRenderer.
The image has text in it, the text was jumbled.
So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
Can anyone provide any advice ?
Thank you
was jumbled.
So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
Can anyone provide any advice ?
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
is jumbled and not
clear.
Any suggestions ?
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
What do you mean with I can't view the file in GhostView? Do you get
error messages or what's
am only using the Driver class to set the renderer by RENDER_*
??
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
What do you mean with I can't view the file in GhostView? Do
Send me the generated PS file (and FO) off-list. I'll have a look at it
in about 3 hours, when I'm back. Got to go now...
On 09.05.2003 13:04:48 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
There are no errors when I render the file.
When I call gv test.ps
to open ghost view, ghost view
to the FOTree.
I can include the code file.
Thank you
Ethan
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
Send me the generated PS file (and FO) off-list. I'll have a look
to render an image into PDF with the PDFRenderer.
The image has text in it, the text was jumbled.
So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
Can anyone provide any advice ?
Thank you
Ethan
the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
Can anyone provide any advice ?
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
the data in it, but the
image never apears ?
If I get an image, I will diff the files ??
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
I was able to reproduce the problem. So
hangs ??
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
I was able to reproduce the problem. So you are creating an XSL-FO
document and using an fo:instream-foreign-object with embedded
On 09.05.2003 17:07:29 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
Yes this is correct :-)
If I use fo:external-graphic, then I will have to write the SVG data
to a tmp file
then pass a URL to the fo:external-graphic to the tmp file ?
No, if the only element in your SVG in an image element
On 09.05.2003 18:00:34 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
I change my code to use
fo:external-graphic content-height=6in content-width=7in
src=url(/tmp/tmp.svg)/
No the process locks some where ??
Did you close your temporary file? Anyway, I don't think you will have
to write a
for printing, then format this data to some printer language, PDF,
PS, PCL.
Any ideas or help or advice ??
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
On 09.05.2003 18:00:34 Leet
On 09.05.2003 18:26:11 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
fo:external-graphic src=someimage.png blah blah/
Does it have to be a png ?
No. That was just an example.
I am creating the SVG with the SVGGraphics2D.
Not sure, but why don't you try to render directly with
Leet, Ethan C wrote:
I see the image I want, but the image's text is jumbled and not
clear.
Sounds like
http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#svg-text
I guess SVG wont render to PS.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 09.05.2003 21:29:18 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Leet, Ethan C wrote:
I see the image I want, but the image's text is jumbled and not
clear.
Sounds like
http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#svg-text
You could be right.
I guess SVG wont render to PS.
It does (to a certain degree) and
Sorry for the delay. I've looked up that private discussion with Claes
Bergsten. The theory is that that particular Xerox PDF RIP has a bug in
the PDF to PostScript conversion which causes the subsequent PostScript
RIP to choke on PDF XObjects (which are normally used to hold images).
You don't
Title: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
Hello,
We are developing an Enterprise Application in J2EE. Our client has request to print all the reports in pdf.
We used the Coccon/FOP framework for this. The pdf has been produced properly (it can be viewed perfectly
Sounds to me like the PostScript driver screws up. What does the PDF
look like in GhostScript? Maybe you could post a small example showing
this effect (original PDF (one page) and another PDF generated through
Distiller)?
On 14.02.2003 12:17:58 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
We are developing
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
hello,
Thanks for your reply.
Please see the attached two pdf files. The ghostscript gives the same output as the distilled one.
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Team Leader
Ok, you do realize that you've got a very, very, very ancient version of
FOP there (0.12.2)? We're at 0.20.5rc now. You should consider upgrading
Cocoon and FOP.
On 14.02.2003 14:57:34 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
Please see the attached two pdf files. The ghostscript gives the
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
what might be the changes I have to make If I upgrade Cocoon and FOP ?
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Team Leader
I can't tell for Cocoon, but for FOP this means adjusting your
stylesheets for XSL-FO recommendation. 0.12.2 will still be using an old
working draft of XSL-FO. Shouldn't be too much work.
On 14.02.2003 15:37:36 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
what might be the changes I have to make If I upgrade Cocoon
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
Hello,
Again. We have around 20 reports. So the change in FOp and Cocoon version will be a big one. Are you sure that the Postscript printing problem will be gone after upgrading the version ?
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Ahmed wrote:
Again. We have around 20 reports. So the change in FOp and Cocoon version
will be a big one. Are you sure that the Postscript printing problem will be
gone after upgrading the version ?
Jeremias Maerki
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
Thanks
the sample pdf of fop 0.12.0.2 doesnt print properly on the postscript printers but the fop 0.20rc samples works fine...:-)) Now got the clue of the problem..Thanks a lot
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Team
Patrick Branley wrote:
The RIP can accept a PDF file, which then im assuming converts it to
postscript before output.
If you open a PDF in Acrobat with distiller set up as a printer device you
can print a PDF to another PDF file. Using this process the new PDF file
will pass through the RIP
Victor Mote wrote:
be a short-term fix that wouldn't affect their workflow. Another
workaround
to explore is to output PostScript from PDF see if it works better.
Sorry, this should say output PostScript from FOP.
Victor Mote
The RIP can accept a PDF file, which then im assuming converts it to
postscript before output.
If you open a PDF in Acrobat with distiller set up as a printer device you
can print a PDF to another PDF file. Using this process the new PDF file
will pass through the RIP with no problems.
Patrick
their workflow and
we plan to
send a large number of files to them per year so this isn't a
viable option.
Hmmm. We're missing something here. When you say that your printer distilled
the file in Acrobat, where did the printer get the PostScript code to do
that job? Distiller is itself a PostScript
on dot-matrix printers?
A few times ago, you had carried out tests on dot-matrix...
did you progress?
-Message d'origine-
De : Mirko Sertic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 29 janvier 2003 15:26
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : AW: PS PostScript
Hello!
that sounds not so
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Branley
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2003 3:20 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Postscript Error when RIPing document created with FOP
Hi
I have PDF document created with FOP that I sent to Xerox Docucolor 2060
using a Scitex Spire RIP that failed
PROTECTED]'
Subject: Postscript Error when RIPing document created with FOP
Hi
I have PDF document created with FOP that I sent to Xerox Docucolor 2060
using a Scitex Spire RIP that failed with the following error:
Type DateTimeStage Message
Error Message Feb 05, 11.06.06
Hi Clay
I updated the Jar files to 0.20.4 and still no solution. I have yet to try
0.20.5rc.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Postscript Error when RIPing document created
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 05:12, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
You will have to go with the PDF renderer for now, I'm afraid.
OK.
Is there any other tool that can convert PDF to PostScript in Windows?
Win32 port of pdftops from the xpdf package perhaps:
http://sourceforge.net/project
On 31.01.2003 02:19:03 Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 05:12, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
Is there any other tool that can convert PDF to PostScript in Windows?
Win32 port of pdftops from the xpdf package perhaps:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id
if you're not having a lot of
time at your disposal. Granted, it would be cool if you added the
feature, but it's a lot of work, especially since the PostScript
renderer's character handling (encodings etc.) is not quite correct
right now. You will also have to rework that in order to get your
Unicode
On 29.01.2003 19:29:02 Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 14:41, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi
The Arial font you're talking about is TrueType, right? You can't use
TrueType fonts with the PostScript renderer, yet. The PostScript
renderer is not anywhere near the functionality
, you're getting a yes. :-) I've done this. I've produced PDF
converted it to PostScript using Acrobat Reader 4.05 on Unix (Linux and
Solaris). The generated PostScript can be easily parsed because it
follows the DSC conventions (Document Structuring Conventions, Specs at
Adobe in the PostScript
Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
Hi,
I need to use the PostScript renderer to produce documents with Unicode
text.
I can generate PDF with Korean text using Arial Unicode font from
Microsoft, but PostScript renderer only supports FOP's built in fonts.
Can I add Arial Unicode to the list of FOP fonts
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 14:43, Clay Leeds wrote:
Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
I need to use the PostScript renderer to produce documents with Unicode
text.
I can generate PDF with Korean text using Arial Unicode font from
Microsoft, but PostScript renderer only supports FOP's built in fonts
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 14:41, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi
The Arial font you're talking about is TrueType, right? You can't use
TrueType fonts with the PostScript renderer, yet. The PostScript
renderer is not anywhere near the functionality the PDF renderer offers.
I noticed that you
Hello:
I got an error when attempting to convert from postscript to pdf
that states the following:
Error in content height property value '50%':
org.apache.fop.fo.expr.PropertyException: No conversion defined
Error in content width property value '50
Zhong Yi wrote:
I am using Ghostview8.0 to preview the PS output.
It's seems PS output did not draw any shape or path
which has stroke attribute set to gray or lightgray.
Is this a FOP bug or Ghostview?
Well, try on another machine and some other tool to display
the result, preferably a PS
I am using Ghostview8.0 to preview the PS output.
It's seems PS output did not draw any shape or path
which has stroke attribute set to gray or lightgray.
Is this a FOP bug or Ghostview?
George
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful.
Sign! one problem solved, another comes!
I just found out stroke-dasharray not working in Postscript output. Any ways
to work around?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I have a question about FOP Postscript output. The SVG
graphics look very ugly in PS format. My question is
when will FOP address this issue? Is there any other
FO solution which give a quality PS output? I am in a
process of evaluating FOP for future project. The PDF
output looks cool but the PS
On 11.12.2002 02:45:30 Zhong Yi wrote:
I have a question about FOP Postscript output. The SVG
graphics look very ugly in PS format. My question is
when will FOP address this issue?
Nothing's planned. Nobody is currently working on the PostScript output
AFAIK. If anyone does any work on the PS
to generate SVG instead of PS? That would avoid any problems.
Having high-resolution TIFFs could also be a solution.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 14:54:08 +0100 Torsten Erler wrote:
Attached is a sample pdf file with one included postscsript-ad (Ad.ps).
The PDF uses the same font like the original postscript
Hi
all,
I create
pdf-documents with fop which have other postscript files inside.
Now when I print the
generated pdf, the fonts (specified in the postscript) are substituted by (I
think) Courier.
I've tried to embed
these fonts into the pdf. Now the content of the pdf uses this fonts
Attached is a sample pdf file with one included postscsript-ad (Ad.ps).
The PDF uses the same font like the original postscript file
(BellCentennial).
The postscript file is called in the generated fo-file as followed:
fo:block text-align=center
fo:external-graphic src=file:/c:/Ad.ps
find anything.
I was just mucking around with Ghostscript to see what it could do, and used
it to turn a FOP-produced postscript file into PDF. It came out in portrait
when it should have been landscape, and I can't work out how to stop this
happening.
If I make the PDF using FOP it comes out
Ghostscript to make an
uncompressed version. It seems to have worked fine.
So then I used Ghostscript to make a postscript version of the ok PDF and
compared it to FOP version that had all the problems, but there was no
difference in the commands that I could recognise, although there were
plenty
to make a postscript version of the ok PDF and
compared it to FOP version that had all the problems, but there was no
difference in the commands that I could recognise, although there were
plenty of differences amongst the gobbledegook below them - not very helpful
I'm afraid.
Cheers,
Jeremias
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
