Re: ports error (or warning) after cvsup

2007-01-31 Thread Eric Schuele
On 01/31/2007 18:15, Petre Bandac wrote: portversion -v | grep "<" [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port entries found .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.7000.8000.9000.1...

Re: ports error (or warning) after cvsup

2007-01-31 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
John Nielsen wrote: > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 19:15, Petre Bandac wrote: >> portversion -v | grep "<" >> [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb >> in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port entries >> found >> .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000 >> .6000...

Re: ports error (or warning) after cvsup

2007-01-31 Thread John Nielsen
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 19:15, Petre Bandac wrote: > portversion -v | grep "<" > [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb > in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port entries > found > .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000 >.6000.7000.8000..

ports error (or warning) after cvsup

2007-01-31 Thread Petre Bandac
portversion -v | grep "<" [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port entries found .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.7000.8000.9000.1.11000.12000.13000

problems with cvsup on cvsup2 server

2007-01-31 Thread Dino Vliet
Hi guys, look at this terrible error I got from portupgrade [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/dino]# portupgrade -n gnome-desktop ---> Session started at: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:22:24 +0100 [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port entries found .1000

Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
php5-cgi hasn't been a separate port for some time. Try "make config" in lang/php5. ~BAS On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Charlie McElfresh wrote: Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line ports-all in my cvs_sup

Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Roland Smith
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:20:03AM -0800, Charlie McElfresh wrote: > After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there > before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. Check out Freshports: http://www.freshports.org/commits.php This gives you an overview of recently chan

Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Jonathan Horne
> Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE > > In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line > > ports-all > > in my cvs_supfile > > After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there > before, notably php

Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Charlie McElfresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE > > In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line > > ports-all > > in my cvs_supfile > > After the update finished, I notic

CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Charlie McElfresh
Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line ports-all in my cvs_supfile After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. I'd appreciate being point

Re: cvsup file info needed please advise

2007-01-26 Thread Dak Ghatikachalam
On 1/27/07, Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > Hi world > > I am working on performing the kernel upgrade using cvsup , > > my file cvsup-standard file is looking like > > " > *default host=cvsup2.us.FreeBSD.org > *defau

Re: cvsup file info needed please advise

2007-01-26 Thread Joe Holden
Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: Hi world I am working on performing the kernel upgrade using cvsup , my file cvsup-standard file is looking like " *default host=cvsup2.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_1 *default delete use-rel-s

cvsup file info needed please advise

2007-01-26 Thread Dak Ghatikachalam
Hi world I am working on performing the kernel upgrade using cvsup , my file cvsup-standard file is looking like " *default host=cvsup2.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_1 *default delete use-rel-suffix *.default compress src-all

Re: 答复: cvsup failed

2007-01-18 Thread Guido Demmenie
On Jan 18, 2007, at 10:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like this: Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused ... i have change many

Re: cvsup failed

2007-01-18 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:52:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like > this: > > Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org > Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused > ... > > i have

Re: CVSup core dumping

2007-01-18 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 18), Firas Kraiem said: > The title says it all, when I try to run CVSup to update my ports > collection (6.2-RELEASE), I get a core dump error : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cvsup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile > Parsing supfile "/root/ports-supf

CVSup core dumping

2007-01-18 Thread Firas Kraiem
Hi to all of you The title says it all, when I try to run CVSup to update my ports collection (6.2-RELEASE), I get a core dump error : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cvsup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile Parsing supfile "/root/ports-supfile" Connecting to cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org Connected to cvsup.fr.F

Re: cvsup failed

2007-01-18 Thread Guido Demmenie
On Jan 18, 2007, at 10:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like this: Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused ... i have chang

cvsup failed

2007-01-18 Thread StevenZJXu
when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like this: Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused ... i have change many cvsup server , all of then result in then same, what should i do? Thanks

Re: Pulling a patch release using cvsup

2007-01-05 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-01-05 18:16, Josef Grosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to figure out how, using cvsup, to pull a specific patch > release. For example, FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p14. I've tried using the date > of a specific patch from /usr/src/UPDATING but that does

Pulling a patch release using cvsup

2007-01-05 Thread Josef Grosch
I'm trying to figure out how, using cvsup, to pull a specific patch release. For example, FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p14. I've tried using the date of a specific patch from /usr/src/UPDATING but that does not work. Josef -- Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD

Re: cvsup and amd64

2006-12-15 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Friday 15 December 2006 16:18, Old Ranger wrote: > On Friday 15 December 2006 18:04, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > > Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the > > amd64 architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC > > kernel file

Re: cvsup and amd64

2006-12-15 Thread Old Ranger
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:04, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the amd64 > architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC kernel file > through cvsup that is not compatible

RE: cvsup and amd64

2006-12-15 Thread Schmehl, Paul L
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Z. Wade Hampton Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:18 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: cvsup and amd64 Greetings to all, I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. I got a disk

Re: cvsup and amd64

2006-12-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:18:11PM -0700, Z. Wade Hampton wrote: > Greetings to all, > I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. > I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, and > installed 6.1 via FTP. > > Yesterday I ran cvsup

Re: cvsup and amd64

2006-12-14 Thread Jay Chandler
Z. Wade Hampton wrote: Greetings to all, I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, and installed 6.1 via FTP. Yesterday I ran cvsup successfully. Today I did "make buildworld" successfully.

cvsup and amd64

2006-12-14 Thread Z. Wade Hampton
Greetings to all, I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, and installed 6.1 via FTP. Yesterday I ran cvsup successfully. Today I did "make buildworld" successfully. Now, I have a little

Re: Local checkout performance - cvs vs cvsup

2006-11-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 11/25/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:25:45AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > I use cvsup to maintain a full local copy of the CVS > repo. I then use plain cvs to check out different branches > of src from it. The problem is while cvs

Re: Local checkout performance - cvs vs cvsup

2006-11-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:25:45AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > I use cvsup to maintain a full local copy of the CVS > repo. I then use plain cvs to check out different branches > of src from it. The problem is while cvsup only takes a > minute each time I run it, cvs takes severa

Local checkout performance - cvs vs cvsup

2006-11-24 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
I use cvsup to maintain a full local copy of the CVS repo. I then use plain cvs to check out different branches of src from it. The problem is while cvsup only takes a minute each time I run it, cvs takes several times more. I run cvsup with "-gs" and cvs with "-rR" flags.

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Eric Schuele
I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? I tried cvsup3.us.freebsd.org (the example you showed in your supfile), and it seemed fine; not just fast, but fully in synch with my usual cvsup host (although i

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
mailing list in case this was not known. >> >>> I have not changed anything on my end. Is there something going on >>> that I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to >>> interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? &g

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Saturday 18 November 2006 12:46, VeeJay wrote: > On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? > > Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST     or     cvsup should be Run FIRST? Check out this URL for more definitive information: Chapter 21 The Cutting

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Jonathan Horne
t;hubs" mailing list in case this was not known. > > > >> I have not changed anything on my end. Is there something going on > >> that I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to > >> interact with them? Is it related to the release, the

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Eric Schuele
? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? I tried cvsup3.us.freebsd.org (the example you showed in your supfile), and it seemed fine; not just fast, but fully in synch with my usual cvsup host (although it was busy enough that I had to try for a while before I got in). So whatever is going on

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Derek Ragona
cvsup to get the latest security updates, then do your rebuilds. At 11:46 AM 11/18/2006, VeeJay wrote: Hello On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? -- Thanks! BR / vj

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Armin Arh
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 06:46:56PM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? Most people do not need a custom Kernel, just some modules added at runtime. On What part of source do you intend to run cvsup? New Kernel should be run in order

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 11/18/06, VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? None if you don't want to update it. OTOH, if you want to do that, you should update

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Russell E. Meek
Quoting VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? -- Thanks! BR / vj ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org m

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
seem to have stopped updating. I've cc'd the "hubs" mailing list in case this was not known. cvsup-master.freebsd.org was down a few days ago, and also on Friday. On Friday it changed its IP address. All of these were scheduled, I believe, but it might have

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On November 18, 2006 6:46:56 PM +0100 VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? It won't do you any good to rebuild the kernel unles

Re: Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
VeeJay wrote: > Hello > > On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? > > Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? > If you want to update your system (base, not ports), you first have to run cvsup and then make buildwo

Fresh System: Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?

2006-11-18 Thread VeeJay
Hello On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first? Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST? -- Thanks! BR / vj ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? I tried cvsup3.us.freebsd.org (the example you showed in your supfile), and it seemed fine; not just fast, but fully in synch with my usual cvsup host (although it was busy enough that I had to try for a while before I got in). So whatev

Re: cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread ajm
. No source, no ports, no docs. > > I have not changed anything on my end. Is there something going on that > I am not aware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to > interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? > > I'm using RELENG_6.

cvsup problems....

2006-11-18 Thread Eric Schuele
ware of that is affecting the servers, or my ability to interact with them? Is it related to the release, the move, anything? I'm using RELENG_6. I use: cvsup -g -L 1 ${SUPFILE_DIR}/supfile And: *default host=cvsup3.us.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default rele

cvsup server resolution weirdness

2006-11-02 Thread Vince
Does anyone know why a) every so often i get "Name lookup failure for "cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org": Host name lookup failed" when i try to connect to cvsup.uk.freebsd.org and b) why even after i get the name resolved I get this output from a dig +trace on the servername [EMAIL PROTECTED] +trace cvsup.uk

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-31 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:24 -0800, Pete Slagle wrote: > Edit fastest_cvsup. It's just a Perl script -- it's simple to change it > to check whatever list of servers you want. Yeah but then I have to remember to fix it each time whenever it gets updated (which is currently what I've been doing). It

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-31 Thread Pete Slagle
James Long wrote: >> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:21:32 +1100 >> From: Alan Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ?? >> To: Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-31 Thread James Long
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:21:32 +1100 > From: Alan Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ?? > To: Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > &g

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Alan Garfield
y just manually override SUPHOST if it doesn't work. > > SUP_UPDATE=true > > SUPFILE=/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile > > SUP=/usr/local/bin/csup > > SUPFLAGS=-L 2 > > SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au` > > Neat - didn't know you could

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:30 +1100, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:21:32 +1100 > Alan Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au` > > change this to not get the last item, which I assume is #6 ? Nah it goes up to #7, and you'd have

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Juha Saarinen
, that's Planetmirror, isn't it? Have you tried contacting them? SUP_UPDATE=true SUPFILE=/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile SUP=/usr/local/bin/csup SUPFLAGS=-L 2 SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au` Neat - didn't know you could put it into make.conf like that

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:21:32 +1100 Alan Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au` change this to not get the last item, which I assume is #6 ? _ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "I was born not knowing and have had only a littl

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 10:42 +1100, Norberto Meijome wrote: > Hi all, > i'm trying to cvsup /usr/src from cvsup.au.freebsd.org, cvsup2.freebsd.org and > even 3. they are all rejecting my connections... > > Is it that I stink ;) or something else is going on? I also

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:44:35 -0800 "Jeff Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whats the error they reject with? $ sudo make update -- >>>

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Juha Saarinen
On 10/31/06, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, i'm trying to cvsup /usr/src from cvsup.au.freebsd.org, cvsup2.freebsd.org and even 3. they are all rejecting my connections... Is it that I stink ;) or something else is going on? Nah, they seem to h

Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Jeff Mohler
Whats the error they reject with? On 10/30/06, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, i'm trying to cvsup /usr/src from cvsup.au.freebsd.org, cvsup2.freebsd.org and even 3. they are all rejecting my connections... Is it that I stink ;) or something else is going

cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
Hi all, i'm trying to cvsup /usr/src from cvsup.au.freebsd.org, cvsup2.freebsd.org and even 3. they are all rejecting my connections... Is it that I stink ;) or something else is going on? cheers :) _ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Science Fiction...the on

csup vs. cvsup [was: Ports collection issue]

2006-10-27 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
[format recovered] On 27/10/2006 14:41, Andy Greenwood wrote: > On 10/27/06, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would recommend using csup instead of cvsup. >> It has fewer dependencies, is very lightweight and works very well >> if y

Re: cvsup

2006-10-26 Thread Jeff Mohler
eoghan wrote: >> > On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: >> > > eoghan wrote: >> > >> Hi >> > >> Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: >> > >> Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later >

Re: cvsup

2006-10-26 Thread Brian
Jeff Mohler wrote: hmm..Im running the latest code, but I dont see that file fastest_cvsup. On 10/25/06, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 25 October 2006 06:07, eoghan wrote: > On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > eoghan wrote: > >>

Re: cvsup

2006-10-26 Thread Lane
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 07:52, eoghan wrote: > Hi > Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: > Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later > So im using cvsup.FreeBSD.org > but have tried cvsup1.FreeBSD.org, cvsup2.FreeBSD.org and > cvsup3.FreeBSD.org

Re: cvsup

2006-10-26 Thread Jeff Mohler
hmm..Im running the latest code, but I dont see that file fastest_cvsup. On 10/25/06, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 25 October 2006 06:07, eoghan wrote: > On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hi > >> Tr

Re: cvsup

2006-10-25 Thread Brian
eoghan wrote: Hi Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later So im using cvsup.FreeBSD.org but have tried cvsup1.FreeBSD.org, cvsup2.FreeBSD.org and cvsup3.FreeBSD.org and get the same message... is there something wrong? Thanks

Re: cvsup

2006-10-25 Thread Kent Stewart
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 06:07, eoghan wrote: > On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hi > >> Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: > >> Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later > >> So i

Re: cvsup

2006-10-25 Thread Bill Moran
In response to eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hi > >> Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: > >> Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later > &

Re: cvsup

2006-10-25 Thread eoghan
On 25 Oct 2006, at 14:03, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: eoghan wrote: Hi Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later So im using cvsup.FreeBSD.org but have tried cvsup1.FreeBSD.org, cvsup2.FreeBSD.org and cvsup3.FreeBSD.org and get the

Re: cvsup

2006-10-25 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
eoghan wrote: Hi Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later So im using cvsup.FreeBSD.org but have tried cvsup1.FreeBSD.org, cvsup2.FreeBSD.org and cvsup3.FreeBSD.org and get the same message... is there something wrong? Thanks

cvsup

2006-10-25 Thread eoghan
Hi Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later So im using cvsup.FreeBSD.org but have tried cvsup1.FreeBSD.org, cvsup2.FreeBSD.org and cvsup3.FreeBSD.org and get the same message... is there something wrong? Thanks Eoghan

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: Well another cvsup won't solve the problem since php hasn't been patched yet. However if you're really sure you need and want this kind of port installed just set the environment variable DISABLE_VULNERABI

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > >> Well another cvsup won't solve the problem since php hasn't been patched >> yet. However if you're really sure you need and want this kind of port >>

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello, On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: Well another cvsup won't solve the problem since php hasn't been patched yet. However if you're really sure you need and want this kind of port installed just set the environment variable DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES. However - you

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > >> run portaudit -F >> it will update your database. >> btw. just a sidenote - if you have not done it - after a cvsup of the >> portstree you should also update your index (

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello, On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: run portaudit -F it will update your database. btw. just a sidenote - if you have not done it - after a cvsup of the portstree you should also update your index (dependencies etc) by running make index (takes long) or make fetchindex (fast

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hello, On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote: I just csup'ed my ports tree and ran make on python without any problem. portupgrade is a convenient tool but sometimes it fail for whatever reason, no idea in your case. I tried make as you suggest and: $ sudo make =

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Warren Liddell
5b-55e1-11db-a5ae-00508d6a62d >f.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. What does your cvsup file look like ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
2df.html> > > => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 run portaudit -F it will update your database. btw. just a sidenote - if you have not done it - after a cvsup of the portstree you should also update your index (dependencies etc) by running make

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello, On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote: I just csup'ed my ports tree and ran make on python without any problem. portupgrade is a convenient tool but sometimes it fail for whatever reason, no idea in your case. I tried make as you suggest and: $ sudo make ===> python-2.4.3_1 has k

Re: cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
tree by using cvsup and then I cd to the appropriate port and issue portupgarde. However, in both cases (php and python) I get an error. example pasted below: $ sudo portupgrade ---> Upgrading 'python-2.4.3' to 'python-2.4.3_1' (lang/python) ---> Buildi

cvsup and portupgrade

2006-10-08 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
cvsup and then I cd to the appropriate port and issue portupgarde. However, in both cases (php and python) I get an error. example pasted below: $ sudo portupgrade ---> Upgrading 'python-2.4.3' to 'python-2.4.3_1' (lang/python) ---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/py

Re: Error with CVSUP server

2006-10-06 Thread Josh Paetzel
net.au. cvsup.isp.net.au. 86400 IN A 202.1.117.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jpaetzel -> telnet cvsup2.au.freebsd.org 5999 Trying 202.1.117.1... Connected to cvsup.isp.net.au. Escape character is '^]'. OK 17 0 SNAP_16_1h CVSup server ready -- Th

Error with CVSUP server

2006-10-06 Thread Warren Liddell
is the cvsup2 server in australia down? As trying to connect i get a lookup failure ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Modifying cvsup-mirror port to mirror OpenBSD cvsup

2006-10-04 Thread stan
I'm trying to modify a machine that I was using to mirror the FreeBSD cvsup tree qith to do OpenBSD instead. The machine was originally set up using the cvsup-mirror port. I've changed /usr/local/etc/cvsup/config.sh to look like this: user="cvsup" group="cvsup" c

Adding an OpenBSD cvsup mirror to an existing FreeBSD cvsup mirror

2006-09-30 Thread stan
I'd like to be able to use my exsitig FreeBSD cvsup mirror, which I used the cvsup_mirror port to set up, to also mirror the cvsup tree for OpenBSD. Any sugestions as to how to do this? Looks like I need to clone (or modify) /usr/local/etc/cvsup/config.sh. I don't want to break the Fre

Re: cvsup between levels, single user issue

2006-09-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lowell Gilbert wrote: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I was going to attempt an in-place upgrade of a light load server running 5.3 to bring it to 6.1 RELEASE P6 (RELENG_6_1). I read in UPDATING that going between 5.x and 6.x requires single user mode which isn't an option on a remote machine

Re: cvsup between levels, single user issue

2006-09-19 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was going to attempt an in-place upgrade of a light load server > running 5.3 to bring it to 6.1 RELEASE P6 (RELENG_6_1). I read in > UPDATING that going between 5.x and 6.x requires single user mode > which isn't an option on a remote machine (though I can st

cvsup between levels, single user issue

2006-09-18 Thread Chris
I was going to attempt an in-place upgrade of a light load server running 5.3 to bring it to 6.1 RELEASE P6 (RELENG_6_1). I read in UPDATING that going between 5.x and 6.x requires single user mode which isn't an option on a remote machine (though I can stop sendmail, bind, popper etc manua

[CVSup]::[cvsup5.ru.freebsd.org]: No CVSROOT directory.

2006-09-16 Thread Alexey G . Khramkov
Hello. I've used cvsup application under NetBSD-CURRENT to get whole CVS repositories from NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD projects. The client software works with cvsup5.ru.freebsd.org mirror flawlessly (no errors or somthing strange). I have issue with OpenBSD server (cvsup.no.openbsd.org)

Re: Ports cvsup failure

2006-08-27 Thread Lowell Gilbert
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just set up a new cvsup server, using the cvsup-mirror port. I can use it > to update everything that I need but the ports collection. It fails like > this: > > Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" > Connecting to cvs

Ports cvsup failure

2006-08-26 Thread stan
I just set up a new cvsup server, using the cvsup-mirror port. I can use it to update everything that I need but the ports collection. It fails like this: Parsing supfile "ports-supfile" Connecting to cvsup.meadwestvaco.com Connected to cvsup.meadwestvaco.com Server software version:

Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??")

2006-08-22 Thread Garrett Cooper
is not familiar with the FBSD ports system. Just my opinion though. CVSUP isn't that difficult IMHO to learn, and is a better, more efficient way to download the ports Makefiles. In what way? For typical applications, lower bandwidth usage is supposedly an advantage

Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??")

2006-08-22 Thread Erik Trulsson
> >>> if he is not familiar with the FBSD ports system. Just my opinion > >>> though. > > > >>CVSUP isn't that difficult IMHO to learn, and is a better, more > >> efficient way to download the ports Makefiles. > > &

Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??")

2006-08-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Gerard Seibert wrote: > >>> IMHO, it might be a lot easier for him to use portsnap. Especially >>> if he is not familiar with the FBSD ports system. Just my opinion >>> tho

Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??")

2006-08-21 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gerard Seibert wrote: >> IMHO, it might be a lot easier for him to use portsnap. Especially >> if he is not familiar with the FBSD ports system. Just my opinion >> though. >CVSUP isn't that difficult I

Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??")

2006-08-21 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Monday 21 August 2006 15:02, Garrett Cooper wrote: >     CVSUP isn't that difficult IMHO to learn, and is a better, more > efficient way to download the ports Makefiles. It will take him all of > 10-20 minutes to configure if he reads the documentation and uses the > example f

[OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??")

2006-08-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
ers, checksums, and much more, for EVERY port is stored in the ports tree. Unless you update your ports tree, just deinstalling and reinstalling a port won't make it any newer. There are a few ways to update your ports tree. Chapter 4 of the handbook describes a few ways. Personally I like

Re: Portsnap && CVSup

2006-08-08 Thread Daniel Bye
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:22:11AM -0400, Anthony Agelastos wrote: > Hello all, > > I am wondering how well Portsnap plays with CVSup. As an example, > let's say that I accidentally deleted a Port folder (/usr/ports/print/ > hplip as an example), I assume the best way of br

Portsnap && CVSup

2006-08-08 Thread Anthony Agelastos
Hello all, I am wondering how well Portsnap plays with CVSup. As an example, let's say that I accidentally deleted a Port folder (/usr/ports/print/ hplip as an example), I assume the best way of bringing it back would be CVSup and not Portsnap. Is this thinking correct? After using

Re: trouble with cvsup

2006-08-03 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 03.08.2006 um 19:36 schrieb Jonathan Horne: Server warning: RCS file error in "/usr/local/etc/cvsup/prefixes/ FreeBSD.cvs/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/nfsmb/Makefile,v":1: "head" expected Looks like cvsup15.us.freebsd.org has some file corruption. Try using a di

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >