I'll email you off-list with another address you can use.
On 3/10/07, Robert Riebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Hall wrote:
You can email the to me, and I can help upload it for you. Only a few
I already mailed two zipped files to you, but got back: Illegal
attachment.
Robert
Hi guys. I don't have an antivirus program to double-check this with.
So I'm putting out a call to the developers to help verify this virus
report. Does anyone else find this virus with your AV software? Or is
this another false-positive?
-jh
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 20:26 +0300, Сергей wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:07 +0100, Robert Riebisch wrote:
Jim Hall wrote:
Hi Oleg. I can put this on ibiblio for you, if you like. Email me
off-list, and we'll figure out how you can get it to me.
Oleg already agreed, that I give Insight a new home at
http://www.bttr-software.de
Hi Oleg. I can put this on ibiblio for you, if you like. Email me
off-list, and we'll figure out how you can get it to me.
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 15:14 +0300, Oleg O.Chukaev wrote:
Insight debugger 1.20 is ready for release.
Major changes:
English documentation.
Some bugs fixed.
Short
Eric:
I cannot email you anymore. My emails bounce with a greylist error.
Email me off-list to tell me how I can reach you.
-jh
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:16 -0500, Gregory Pietsch wrote:
Although it's personally been a difficult month for me, I have triumphed
once again with a new version of FreeDOS Edlin, the one project without
which the entire FreeDOS project would be plunged into darkness. Version
2.9A reflects
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:40 -0500, Gregory Pietsch wrote:
Jim Hall wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:16 -0500, Gregory Pietsch wrote:
Although it's personally been a difficult month for me, I have triumphed
once again with a new version of FreeDOS Edlin, the one project without
which
://www.laaca-mirror.ic.cz/blocek.rar
source: http://www.laaca.borec.cz/soubory/wokna32.rar or
http://www.laaca-mirror.ic.cz/wokna32.rar
Původní zpráva
Od: Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Předmět: Re: [Freedos-devel] Blocek v1.1
Datum: 19.11.2006 16:09:57
If you are like me, you have used (or are using) the 4DOS command shell.
4DOS was my favorite DOS app. Back in the day, my DOS development
system was guaranteed to have at least one C compiler, a cool editor for
writing code, and a copy of 4DOS to make the command line easier to use.
I still run
I sent the following to Japheth about a week ago:
Have you contacted Paul Vojta vojta/@/math.berkeley.edu about your
improvements to DEBUG? Paul does respond to email (I emailed him
about a week ago, about something else) and I would prefer that Paul
be kept in the loop on changes to a
updates to FreeDOS 1.0 may not make FreeDOS 2.0.
Aitor
2006/10/29, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
E! I'd rather not go back to beta9 SP2 etc naming scheme. The
next FreeDOS should _not_ be a FreeDOS 1.0 SP1. The next FreeDOS is
indeed an incremental improvement with no major changes
:
It looks good, but I just wonder how to name the second bug-fix
release after the third release after FreeDOS 1.0, in that case you
are forced to something like 1.3.2...
Aitor
2006/11/2, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Using 2-digit subversions (1.01) looks too similar to 1.0.1 kind of
naming
Guys,
I fixed the problem with the FreeDOS Bugzilla where you were forced to
constantly login to make any updates. Silly me, when we moved the
www.freedos.org site to freedos.sourceforge.net, I also changed the
Bugzilla entry page (http://www.freedos.org/freedos/bugs/) to use
E! I'd rather not go back to beta9 SP2 etc naming scheme. The
next FreeDOS should _not_ be a FreeDOS 1.0 SP1. The next FreeDOS is
indeed an incremental improvement with no major changes (i.e. updated
packages, etc) then FreeDOS 1.1 would be acceptable. A larger jump in
functionality
Gregory Pietsch wrote:
There's a new version of FreeDOS Edlin, and it's on SourceForge! I've
been trying to get to Jim Hall for days to mirror this information on
FreeDOS's homepage, but I haven't been able to reach him.
Gregory Pietsch
Hi. I posted this earlier today. (2006-10-18
In case you haven't noticed, we seem to be having a problem with
www.freedos.org. This is hosted at SourceForge, so I'm in the process
of opening a ticket with them.
The site at freedos.sourceforge.net is working fine though, so please
use that until www.freedos.org is working.
Thanks,
-jh
Jim Hall wrote:
In case you haven't noticed, we seem to be having a problem with
www.freedos.org. This is hosted at SourceForge, so I'm in the process
of opening a ticket with them.
The site at freedos.sourceforge.net is working fine though, so please
use that until www.freedos.org
Frederic Logghe wrote:
Since several years, I'm using Turbo C on MS-DOS. Last week, my PC
crashed and I'm now planning to use FreeDOS. I just wonder if anyone
has positive experiences running Turbo C on FreeDOS?
Yup, I used to use TC1.01 on FreeDOS, ran completely fine. Then I
located my
Just wanted to send an update on the FreeDOS bugzilla, for those of you
who use it.
You're probably already aware of the problem of sending email. That's
why I put the warning in the big yellow box at
http://www.freedos.org/freedos/bugs/. One of the admins of
SourceForge gave me a hint that
Serghey Suvorov wrote:
Hi Jim,
to your notice:
the full variant (without wattcp) of 1.0 can be installed
in MS VirtPC.
The xBase presence is agreeable especially . There are
little comings which take an interest in
this best language.
Best regards, Serghey
Thanks for the feedback!
Imre Leber wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 09:45 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I tried Full Optimization and Unfragment Files only.
Imre:
Is DFRAG121.ZIP an official 1.2.1 release, something that I should
mirror on ibiblio? Or is this just an interim release, sort of try
this and see if this fixes your problem, and if it does I'll make it a
full release kind of thing?
Actually I was going to announce it
We're still getting hit pretty hard on the web site, although traffic
seems to be dropping. We're down to about 50MB/hour. To help bandwidth
issues, I've updated the stylesheets to be very light on the images -
the FreeDOS fish logo and the (mandatory) SF.net logo button remain, but
other
Imre Leber wrote:
Actually i am kind of convinced that in spite of everything going for
reactos, the only thing truely missing from that project is Jim Hall.
That's probably the reason why it doesn't seem to be moving anywhere fast.
Imre
??
--
This email message has been encrypted
JH ??
Imre mean, that FreeDOS powered by your leadership, :) and this is
missing in ReactOS.
:-)
--
This email message has been encrypted using the ROT-26 cipher.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
Blair Campbell wrote:
Here I am, I've spent about 5 hours slowly downloading the full version,
getting just a few K per second, and right before it gets done, you go and
replace it.
I'm sorry, but I made it quite clear in the announcemet that the full
ISOs were NOT ready yet. I
Just in case anyone is interested in the press coverage this is getting:
Heise Online was the first to post an article about us:
http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/77674
I also sent out something of a press announcement to a variety of news
outlets, and I've contacted
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
w00t1
This is a very important day. I want to send out my thanks to everyone
who has worked on the FreeDOS Project, to help bring us to the 1.0
release. That includes both current members
FYI: I have updated the FreeDOS web site with the 1.0 announcement. A
few pages have changed:
- the front page has been rearranged, and should now be friendlier to
new users. Let me know if the navigation is confusing; I tried to make
it so new users would know where to go, but still useful
Blair Campbell wrote:
Can someone please send this to me or tell me where this is uploaded
(if it is uploaded) within the next hour or I won't have time to
include it in 1.0.
I asked Diego to email it to me off-list, but I haven't seen it yet.
-jh
--
This email message has been
I asked Diego to email it to me off-list, but I haven't seen it yet.
-jh
I sent to you source and binaries yesterday.
Ah, my freedos.org mailbox sometimes rejects large attachments. I'll
email you again off-list with an email address you can use to send it to me.
-jh
--
This
Move 3.3a source and binaries are now available on ibiblio (thanks Diego!)
-jh
--
This email message has been encrypted using the ROT-26 cipher.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Imre Leber wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of defrag, defrag version 1.2. This
solves the bug found by Fritz Mueller, regarding disk corruption in the root
directory.
Version 1.1 should hereby no longer be used, as it corrupts disk data.
You can find it at:
Diego Rodriguez wrote:
Hi!
I want to announce that there is a new version of MOVE (3.3a) that
fixes the following problems:
* FreeDOS truename function doesn't remove trailing backslashes.
* FreeDOS cannot set attributes of a directory without clearing the
directory bit.
Previous MOVE
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
27-Авг-2006 17:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
I do have latest (second) edition of mem110.zip with conversion LF to
CRLF (latest file marked 2006/08/25). If you wish, I may resend it to you.
JH
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi all,
uploaded to http://www.freedos.org/mem/ you can now
find mem111.zip :-)... Unfortunately I lost parts of
the mem 1.10 sources in the course of creating 1.11,
so if you still have a copy, we could upload that
to freedos.org again. I have recreated the lost part
Eric Auer wrote:
Another point which is indeed bad style is that I have split
mem.c into mem.c and mem2.c - you can merge them again with very
little editing, but it would have been a lot better to split the
file properly / cleanly. For now, mem.c simply ends with a line
#include mem2.c, and
Jim Hall wrote:
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi all,
uploaded to http://www.freedos.org/mem/ you can now
find mem111.zip :-)... Unfortunately I lost parts of
the mem 1.10 sources in the course of creating 1.11,
so if you still have a copy, we could upload that
to freedos.org again. I have
I think you are referring to this mini-HOWTO:
http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=FdDocEn.Distribution
Yes, I agree that the source package should contain everything short of
the generated binaries. If there are dupe files, let them be
overwritten. This mini-HOWTO needs to be
PS: Jim, I don't know if you read my message from private mail: I was
just trying to ask you if you could allow or invite me to write to
you private messages from this account of mine (gmail). I say this as
I know your university seemed to have an ellaborate way of granting
access to you ;-)
I do have latest (second) edition of mem110.zip with conversion LF to
CRLF (latest file marked 2006/08/25). If you wish, I may resend it to you.
Email it to me off-list. I'll reply to you (off-list) with my work
(UofM) email address to use. My freedos.org account may fill up if you
(Prot3anThr3ad) wrote:
[Additional Comments] unsubscribe
Hi. To unsubscribe from Freedos-devel, get a password reminder, or
change your subscription options enter your subscription email address,
visit this page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
The
Blair Campbell wrote:
Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to
www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/
as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-source.zip
Enjoy
PS: They contain Eric's QB 4.0 compatibility fix.
Thanks, Blair!
The fdkernel.lsm file
I feel it's important to get 1.0 out there to draw a line in the sand,
that we're at least 1.0 quality. We can do what MS-DOS could do. Maybe
we have a few bugs, but (and maybe this is a sad fact) what 1.0
software doesn't have bugs? People expect it. But marking a 1.0
release means you can
Michael Devore wrote:
At 01:08 PM 8/18/2006 -0500, you wrote:
I feel it's important to get 1.0 out there to draw a line in the sand,
that we're at least 1.0 quality. We can do what MS-DOS could do. Maybe
we have a few bugs, but (and maybe this is a sad fact) what 1.0
software doesn't have
back
on the list.
-jh
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hi. Johnson was warned repeatedly and was told many times what people
didn't like about what he was doing. And Jim Hall gave him a warning
to take such discussions off list. When Johnson failed to take the
timely advice, and only then, he
Eric Auer wrote:
[...]
Okay, wow, that was a novel-length email reply, and a bit more than was
probably needed.
Guys, let's calm down on this point. In short, I welcome Johnson (and
any developer) back to the lists if he avoids trolling. I think he
understands that now. Let's let this
If it's related to the redirector, it may also date back to Jim Tabor,
who made the effort to add CDROM network redirector support to the
DOS-C kernel. IIRC, after Jim was kernel maintainer, it was John Price,
then Bart Oldeman. But Bart is also part of the DOSEmu peeps, so he may
have
...
http://www.devoresoftware.com/goof/beanfront.jpg
http://www.devoresoftware.com/goof/beanback.jpg
Dude, you are having waay too much with your label maker. :-)
--
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.
Imre Leber wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 12:36 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag
I want to test it - could you please post a URL, where I can download it?
Imre Leber wrote:
Is the website supposed to remain looking like it is.
It doesn't look very nice :-(
Imre
I'll be updating some content on the front page around the time we
release FreeDOS 1.0, but otherwise I was finished with the design.
What don't you like about the site? It's
Blair Campbell wrote:
Isn't glibc licensed under the Lesser GPL (LGPL) for this very reason?
But a commercial app still cannot _statically_ link to it in that
case; only dynamically.
Specifically, the GNU LGPL says this in its preamble:
For example, [..] If you link other code
Alain M. wrote:
Mark Bailey escreveu:
Isn't glibc licensed under the Lesser GPL (LGPL) for this very reason?
There is nowhere to be seen any licence for glibc, not even in it's
site. But even in LGPL it is a problem: you have to use the systems's
version and it brings many
...
1. users shouldn't use 8-bit characters in letters. This is not fix, this is
bad workaround.
2. SF should turn on 8-bit compatibility (I suggest, this is question of
only one line in config files).
3. Readers should use bugless servers and clients.
I think, (2) and (3) are right
Michael Devore wrote:
[...]
Heh, she. Has anyone seen a female within a mile/kilometer/furlong of
FreeDOS development? Too bad about the lack of them, though. We could use
a few.
My wife is sitting a few feet away from me as I write this. Does that
count? :-)
--
I'm sorry my
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
20-Июл-2006 12:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
Do you think, that distance allows/mean more rude behavior?! :) :(
J No, it means using Bugzilla for bug reports - if anything at all. :)
Strange.
All: Please don't make any further replies to this thread on the list.
This is nothing but a troll.
Earlier, I had given Johnson a warning off-list to stop his trolling,
but he chose to ignore that warning. I have removed him from the list.
-jh
--
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I
I feel very strongly that we must not have timeouts on the options when
you first boot. Eric gives a good example - it happened to me. I was
at work when I was testing the new CDROM (on Parallels on my iMac) and
happened to get a phone call. When I looked back at my session, I had
gotten an
And there remains issue with nested comments.
MD No issue; no nesting. Ergo, I'm not changing it. In reply, rather than
MD quoting boring old pre-ISO C compiler options, please instead trace
support
MD back to the far more enriching Magna Carta. King John of England's
I'm experimenting with fdfullws.iso at the moment. It looks good so
far, but I'm not done with the install yet. There is some menu cleanup
that we could do before 1.0 ... I'll do some more experimenting and see
if I can suggest something.
One thing I would recommend is that we not have a
Florian Xaver wrote:
Hi,
somebody sent me a skin for oZone, which looks like the skin of Windows
Vista. I would like to include it into the package. Would it be legal?
IANAL, but as long as you don't re-use copyrighted content (i.e. this
person didn't actually use graphics taken from
I also mirrored this release on ibiblio, and updated the LSM on the web
site. :-)
Blair Campbell wrote:
Just in time :-) (15 min left here)
On 7/14/06, Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ are the files
emmx211.zip, EMM386
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
9-Июл-2006 14:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AS alternatively can someone else send those (source+binary) to me?
Done.
I gather that Aitor was able to upload the files to ibiblio as they are
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
1. emm386.lsm file isn't updated (old version).
Fixed on www.freedos.org
-jh
--
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
No, sorry I have not received your off-list emails.
-jh
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
Jim, do you receive at last my private letters? I again receive
messages, that may letters delayed:
The original message was received at Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:52:27 +0400 (MSD)
from localhost
Blair Campbell wrote:
Just to let you know, due to lack of bugfixes in the graphical
installer, it cannot be included with 1.0, otherwise people would
blame us for releasing buggy software. The text installer works
pretty much everywhere and is much more stable.
Unless anyone releases a
?
-jh
Blair Campbell wrote:
well, if you know PASCAL, it might be possible to modify the graphical
installer, but otherwise, I would recommend a rewrite. The current
gui installer requires a slightly older than latest version of
FreePASCAL.
On 7/5/06, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Nope, I'm looking for a C library that helps draw the graphical elements
(windows, buttons, ...) like to build a graphical application. It needs
to be lightweight - this is going to fit on a boot disk. Embedded apps
like cash register displays, etc use something like this.
Along the lines of
I'm not married to the idea of a GUI installer. I'm just as happy to
update the text installer, but it has to look nice (again, this is the
first experience people have with FreeDOS.) So, I'll expand my call for
recommendations to include TUI toolkits.
-jh
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi Jim,
I
Thanks. I updated the Software List.
Florian Xaver wrote:
Hi!
Begin3
Title: Arachne WWW Browser and e-mail client
Version: 1.90
Entered-date: 2006-04-13
Description: Web browser and e-mail client for DOS.
Keywords: web, browser, arachne, e-mail, internet
Author:
Imre Leber wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby posting a long overdue version of defrag.
It has fixes regarding the interface.
The command line interface now actually works and there is now the status bar
is updated in move file fragments together mode.
Further more there is now a check on FAT32 and
Imre Leber wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of chkdsk.
This version now has a status indicator in surface scan mode and does not
stop the checking when a suspicious media descriptor was found.
You can find it at:
http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/chkdsk09.zip
This
Michael Devore wrote:
No, I'm sorry, this explanation doesn't quite do it to me. You are the
sole owner of the FreeDOS name. You can declare version 1.0, or 2.0.5 or
3.gizmo.woofdaddy at any time -- 1.0 release status doesn't and never did
need a committee. Just do it, give everybody on
Blair Campbell wrote:
I think that 1.0 pre1 is good to start with, as we want to be able to
work out distribution bugs before a final release (we don't want to
repeat SR2).
I'd rather we went for 1.0 instead of 1.0 pre1. I agree we should
verify the distribution, but I'd rather we not
Blair Campbell wrote:
Why is there a horrible joke on www.freedos.org??
FreeDOS is definitely NOT dead, and it IS close to 1.0.
In short, not dead.
Man, I did a really stupid thing with the web site. I've gotten so
much email on this that it's a lesson I won't soon forget.
The truth
Jim Hall wrote:
[...]
It's as though we're afraid of the 1.0 label, sort of asymptotically
approaching 1.0 but never really getting there.
A lot of people probably wonder why is '1.0' so important? I feel we
need to get 1.0 out there to draw a line in the sand, that we're at
least
Hi. I finally got around to mirroring this on the FreeDOS archive at
ibiblio. It's at:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/system/
Marcus Furlong wrote: (02 June)
Hi,
After looking for a GPL alternative to Norton's batch enhancer and not
finding one (if there is
Specifically, the // was introduced in the C99 spec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_programming_language#C99
Blair Campbell wrote:
Well, the latest C standard says that // is a valid C source code
comment, so...
On 6/13/06, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A slight commenr,
I'm sure many of you are members of SourceForge, so you probably already
got this email. But I thought I'd fwd this to the list anyway to make
sure everyone knew about the CVS change on SourceForge:
SourceForge.net Team wrote:
Greetings,
You are receiving this mail because you are a
Someone posted a openwatcom-complete.tar.bz2 file on ibiblio at
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/. This wasn't the
right location for it, so I've relocated it to
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/c/openwatcom/
and renamed the file to
On Saturday, 20 May, the data center that hosts the www.freedos.org web
site will be doing maintenance and upgrades on their UPS that requires
turning off all power for 4 hours. Between 8AM and noon (US/Central,
GMT-0600) on 20 May 2006, the www.freedos.org web site will be unavailable.
-jh
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 19:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
name in man' pages? For example: sed(1), dirent(3), etc.
RR That's a section number. 1 = Commands, 2 = System calls, ... see
RR
FYI: the datacenter where the www.freedos.org server is hosted will be
doing some maintenance on Friday morning, 17 March. This will last
until noon (GMT-0600, or US/Central). The web site may be unavailable
during that time.
-jh
--
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for
Is the webmaster who runs the http://freedos.gds.tuwien.ac.at/ web site
on this list? Hi. I noticed that your FreeDOS mirror site doesn't
display the styles correctly. Looks like you probably mirrored the
FreeDOS web site using a web crawler, rather than using the
This is a test, please ignore.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web.
data was converted successfully.
Please check out the new Bugzilla, and if you have any issues, please
email them to me (off-list). I'll make time over the next few days to
respond to any problems that get reported.
-jh
Jim Hall wrote:
Hi everyone.
Things aren't looking so great, and I
David O'Shea wrote:
Hi all,
How come all the URLs on the FreeDOS website are of the form
http://www.freedos.org/freedos/something? I assume it was not always
this way because fdos\doc\mem\bugs.txt refers to
http://www.freedos.org/bugs; which doesn't seem to exist anymore. It would
be nice if
- probably Saturday. I'll disable Bugzilla put up a
web page just before I do the final database dump, and will update links
and post a news item when the move is complete.
-jh
Jim Hall wrote:
Owen Rudge wrote:
Hi Jim,
Well, just to reiterate my offer from last year, if you need hosting
Jim Hall wrote:
Hi, all. I have a problem with the web site hosting. Unfortunately,
the person who is currently hosting the www.freedos.org web site can be
difficult to work with - and lately, VERY difficult. I'm somewhat
concerned that if things continue to sour with this guy, he might
Owen Rudge wrote:
Hi Jim,
Well, just to reiterate my offer from last year, if you need hosting for
Bugzilla or anything else, let me know and it can be sorted out. My
servers are not going to disappear any time soon. :-)
Owen, you so rock.
Hmm.. maybe this can become our Option #2, if
Rather than wait for that to happen,
Could you give some numbers about that hosting? Disk space, amount of
transfered data, sw requirements, and whatever.
I would like to study a solution around here...
That's one of the areas in which things have been difficult - stats.
The guy who
Markus Laire wrote:
Slashdot has an article Microsoft FAT Patent Upheld
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/11/0555252tid=155tid=109
The discussion also links to the page FAT File System Technology License
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp
Does anyone know if this is a
I started looking more into the patents in question, and I'm not really
concerned with respect to FreeDOS. The 3 patents listed on
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp are:
* U.S. Patent #5,579,517
Common name space for long and short filenames
* U.S. Patent #5,758,352
Common
Hi. I'm not sure who owns the mirror site at
http://mirrors.pmmf.hu/freedos/ but it appears to be down. I've removed
this site from our mirror list. I don't seem to have a contact email
address for this mirror site.
If you are the webmaster, please email me off-list to get re-added.
Hi from Italy.
www.freedos.org looks blank, empty
I'm very embarrassed by that. Sorry. Just before I signed off last
night (after sending my note) I tweaked the get-index script on
www.freedos.org, which constructs the front page every hour. It was a
minor change, so I didn't test it.
Webmasters will want to do a refresh of their FreeDOS.org web site
mirror. I just made a change to the css that will make your front page
look weird _unless_ you refresh.
I've also removed the FreeDOS News Bits section with a FreeDOS
Pressroom section. All the News Bits files have been
Will do.
(Expect it this weekend.)
Alain wrote:
Please send me that version prior to inserting into ibiblio so that I
can test if it has the same strange behaviour in XDEL.
--
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
Hi there,
I have incidentally visited the [EMAIL PROTECTED] page, and I've seen their new
redesign, I don't know since when it's there, but wow! It definitely
needed it, and it's cute now, at least to my eyes.
I noticed SF was down earlier this morning, when
Bart Oldeman wrote:
Hi Jim,
I think you confused SourceForge with SlashDot, although both sites
are owned by the same company.
D'oh! That was a big typo - I had just finished doing a bunch of stuff
on the SourceForge site, so that was still floating in my head when I
wrote my email. Yes,
Bart Oldeman wrote:
...
But there are really two seperate issues here:
1) is the thing mentioned in the yellow box on www.freedos.org about
SYS and FDXXMS. Well at least they mention it now (I can sleep well
as co-copyright holder of SYS I guess):
http://www.drdos.com/products/drdos81.htm
901 - 1000 of 1083 matches
Mail list logo
