I already was pointed out to this mail shortly after it appeared and
it's already fixed in SVN.
@Henning:
All shortcuts were working, like Ctrl-I or Ctrl-H. Only Alt-A
wasn't working anymore, which is fixed in svn now. Hope this improves
Gajim's usability for you.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Des
Henning Oschwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, thanks. A shortcut for "send file" would be awesome, in case
> there isn't already one which I'm not aware of.
I added shortcuts for *EVERY* button in the chat window and the GC
window now (see r9601).
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: P
Stephan Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I look at gajim, I see the following broken windows:
> - OSX integration
It's totally broken and I'm for reverting it and doing it from scratch.
> - OTR-Encryption
We can keep that in trunk and just remove the line that loads the OTR
module before
"Nikos Kouremenos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> test yes it's one important thing. but I was thinking more like
> attracting a dev or at least an occasional patcher. else ok you find
> bug, but who will try to fix it and test it and close the ticket if
> noone from the devs cannot test on the plat
I'd suggest that we branch in about 1 months and only add fixes to that
branch then. If we'd use Mercurial instead of SVN, things would be much
easier :/. A decentral VCS would be better anyway.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason for waiting another month?
Yes, it's not very useful to branch when it's not in a usable state.
ATM, we need too fix a lot to make it usable again, too much was
changed at once, for example the roster, session-centric, etc.
--
Jonathan
s
"Nikos Kouremenos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no svn is more than fine. centralization is good for managing
> software such as Gajim. Gajim is not Mozilla nor Apache
I *STRONGLY* disagree. Ever tried to work with SVN when you're in a
train with your laptop, without any WLAN? You're screwed then
Brendan Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using (and liking) git-svn with Gajim, but ideally it would be
> DVCS from end-to-end.
Git wouldn't be so good for Gajim since it doesn't run on all platforms
Gajim runs on (git lacks Windows support - yes, I know of Cygwin, but
that doesn't count s
"Jeffrey Ollie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried msysgit? I haven't tried it myself as I'm not a
> regular user of Windows.
Doesn't sound too comfortable either. For Mercurial, there's even
TortoiseHg which is as comfortable as TortoiseSvn :). And working with
terminal apps on Windows
"Nikos Kouremenos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracMercurial is experimental.
Officially, it's experimental, but it works quite well.
> Maybe if trac mercurial goes stable
> but I still wouldn't vote for it because it will make it a lot harder
> to manage releases.
Well, you know that you moved the time now? Was that intended? 22 GMT
is not 22 CEST :D.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Stephan Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about schedule regular meetings? Lets say every two weeks?
Once a month should be more than enough, we're not developing *THAT*
fast ;).
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gajim-dev
Brendan Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My suggestion: If you're in an encrypted chat but you haven't verified
> the identity, overlay a big red question mark on the encryption lock
> icon in the ChatControl and put a tooltip on it explaining the
> problem. Clicking on the question mark pops u
Yann Leboulanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about monday 30th June, 7pm GMT (9pm CEST) ?
I don't know yet if I got time there, but I'll try.
Anyway, I'd suggest we don't have specific dates, but instead we should
just start a conversation when enough developers are in the channel. So
we ca
Am 28.06.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Nikos Kouremenos:
that has problems.
Which do you see with that? IMO, it's bad to only discuss issues once
a month or so.
At least, it sucks for those who can't attend it - we would at least
need a detailed summary on the mailing liwst then.
--
Jonathan
___
"Damien Thébault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I even replaced the resolver in the gajim code by a small wrapper and
> it's working well.
> I'd like to test the case here, the only case where there is a problem
> for me is with a google talk account (doesn't seems to use the
> resolver, is this th
"Damien Thébault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, let's put this code somewhere now :)
> I'll maybe post the patch for gajim if someone is interested.
Feel free to post it here so it can be applied post-0.12.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a release branch in the SVN?
There is a tag. A branch will be done for beta.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
https://lists.
Hi!
I just wanted to ask if any of the developers (or users!) will be at
FrOSCon on the 23th and 24th in St. Augustin (near Bonn, Germany)? For
myself, there's a 99% chance that I'll be there :).
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
Yann Leboulanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed it is a problem, but one of our previous dev don't want to
> release under GPLv3+ (some of his code is still in Gajim: optparser)
Then we need to rewrite it. :/
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Am 03.10.2008 um 16:59 schrieb Robert C Corsaro:
Does anyone else experience the problem that when users are signed
on they are not sorted into the list, but put at the end? Is there
some option to change this? If I can help fix it, I'm a python dev
and would be happy to submit a patch.
As our strings in the installer are final now, we need them translated.
The installer offers the following languages:
* English (0 strings missing)
* French (2 strings missing)
* German (0 strings missing)
* Italian (11 strings missing)
* Spanish (11 strings missing)
* Russian (11 strings missing
Am 07.11.2008 um 19:57 schrieb Debarshi Ray:
I am just curious to know when can we expect to have the stable
release of 0.12? I decided not to update the Fedora package to 0.12
alpha since it looks like there will not be a stable release before
Fedora 10. If we are close to a stable release, I w
Am 08.11.2008 um 17:34 schrieb Yavor Doganov:
FWIW, the company I work for uses Gajim as the standard IM client and
there were no problems like the ones you mention under Debian (with
the official Debian package as it is).
If you don't believe me, look at the patches I committed to the idle
Am 12.11.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Yavor Doganov:
Furthermore, Yann maintains the `gajim' package in Debian, so if it's
really that bad, he ought to do something. This is going to be
supported at least for 2.5 years (roughly) more.
I guess that's a problem with the debian policy - they won't incl
Am 13.11.2008 um 14:12 schrieb Nikos Kouremenos:
Guys, GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free
software.
I guess that if you want to include newest patch for the old release
for deb package Yann won't have a problem accepting your backporting
patches ;)
Hm, yes, maybe I
Am 13.11.2008 um 08:11 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
I don't see why I would do that, no major bug was reported in debian
package. 0.12 has to be stabilized before it goes in a stable release.
No stability issues, yes, but silent message dropping, which you
hardly notice. The old problem with t
Am 13.11.2008 um 22:40 schrieb Matej Cepl:
Weird, Fedora has 0.11.4 and it works pretty well.
Then just send yourself a stanza that will create a traceback (there
were hundreds of them in 0.11.4, a simple file transfer that fails due
to FS full or something is enough) and look how many new
Am 24.11.2008 um 21:25 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Best Regards,
steve-e
Uhm, did I miss something?
Will comment on the rest later.
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@g
Asterix has already set up a test repo with hg, I checked it out via
ssh and everything seemed to work fine, even the test trac with
mercurial worked fine :). The only thing left is to map the old svn
revision IDs to the matching hg revision IDs.
Asterix said we'll switch after 0.12 :).
--
Jonat
Am 14.12.2008 um 00:48 schrieb Nikos Kouremenos:
not that I hack anymore on Gajim but I am always against DVCS and
their ideas and especially on projects with small amount of
contributors such as Gajim.
I strongly believe that SVN rocks and also for you to commit
upstream and keep it cent
Am 15.12.2008 um 14:46 schrieb Michal 'vorner' Vaner:
I'm not saying it is problem of usability, but of familiarity. I'm
able
to, for example, edit the history before I push my commits, if I make
mistake, with git. I do not think I can do this with hg. I do not
say I
can not do it. I just s
Am 16.12.2008 um 22:50 schrieb Yavor Doganov:
This is entirely inappropriate.
There is nothing wrong in a partially translated program; otherwise
msgfmt would consider untranslated/fuzzy messages a critical error.
Removing incomplete translations has only nefarious effects: It is an
insult to
elog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog
Thanks to Jonathan Schleifer, all patches are upstream.
With this update I'm dropping maintainership,
as I'm not really using gajim anymore, in favor of mcabber. Any
takers?
Besides 'make lib-depends-check' is telli
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> Jonathan Schleifer a écrit :
> > Here's a mail where OpenBSD states why they won't commit 0.12 into
> > their ports tree.
>
> Thanks for the news.
>
> > So much for "This is not a issue for users not using GPRS", Yann.
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> As it's not possiblt to have private mail, let's continue here.
>
> Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> >
> >> Jonathan Schleifer a écrit :
> > It's not. It's just that I want to show you
Am 21.12.2008 um 11:42 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
I won't put oil on fire, just to tell that after private dicussion,
there is indeed a problem with TCP timout, it lasts more than 10
minutes.
That is because Gajim doesn't call setsockopt().
So tests are needed to improve that. But 0.12.1 sh
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:07 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
You think more people are affected by this 30s timeout than by
filetranfer? Really? I think more people use FT than are on a slow
connection.
Yes, definitely. You don't send files all the time. Besides, which
problem with file transfers? I hav
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:36 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
I think you should read ticket, and test 0.12 branch. There is a
missing
import so sending file is just not possible.
Hm, maybe they're using trunk then. I'll have a look.
And please, stop saying that only a few people are affected by this
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:53 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
If one dev get all complaints and don't forward them to bug tracker, I
don't see how we could go forward ...
I told you I got bug reports, but you always insisted that only I got
the bug and the bug reports I received were bogus.
Have you ti
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> That's not another personal attack, no, of course.
How is stating that you said a personal attack?
> That said, I don't remeber having said that, and that doesn't prevent
> you to fix that.
You did it in the mail before. You said you only have heard from me
about the
Am 21.12.2008 um 14:16 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Where is it said that "[I] always insisted that only [you] got the bug
and the bug reports [you] received were bogus."
I never said you didn't got any complaints, just that *I* never got.
And
I never talked about the bugreports you got ... But m
Am 22.12.2008 um 00:12 schrieb Matej Cepl:
Get a mail client which complies with RFC 2369 -- just from the
top my head -- Thunderbird does with
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4455
This is not an option as I use different MUAs. Claws-Mail seems to
handle it like expected,
Am 13.01.2009 um 14:43 schrieb Serge Matveenko:
Here is the patch for gajim-0.11.4 for sources from Ubuntu Hardy repo.
Although patches are appreciated, please don't do them against a
codebase into which no new features have been added for 3 years :).
Please use 0.12.x or svn instead.
-
Am 27.01.2009 um 14:29 schrieb Yavor Doganov:
[I submitted this as a Trac ticket, but got "Submission rejected due
to potential spam" or similar.]
I believe Gajim is currently not distributable, as even an optional
dependency on python-openssl requires the license of Gajim to have the
(in)famou
Am 27.01.2009 um 14:48 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer:
d8289
Additionally, GPL explicitely allows "mere aggregation", so even our
Windows binaries are no
See also:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/
29c7588fbecproblem, as OpenSSL is a separate DLL which is
Am 27.01.2009 um 14:56 schrieb Yavor Doganov:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
We do not ship with py-OpenSSL.
We do not include any of the code from py-OpenSSL.
I never said you did.
Then I fail to see the problem.
I don't see where we are viol
Am 08.02.2009 um 14:55 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Hi all,
GSOC will arrive in the next monthes, so we can start thinking about
project we could propose.
So what new features would you like to see in Gajim ?
We can discuss that on Wednesday at the end of the meeting.
I think we should not int
Am 08.02.2009 um 14:55 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Hi all,
GSOC will arrive in the next monthes, so we can start thinking about
project we could propose.
So what new features would you like to see in Gajim ?
We can discuss that on Wednesday at the end of the meeting.
I think we should not int
Am 09.02.2009 um 07:04 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
codecs are handled by gstreamer, not sure we do a lot about that. I CC
to liori who may have ideas about that.
Ok, then another project would be to get all that running on Windows.
I'm not so sure how well gstreamer runs on Windows, a while ag
Yavor Doganov wrote:
> No. If a GPL'ed package incorporates files under GPL-compatible
> licenses (with or without modifications), it is perfectly OK to
> prepend the GPL license and copyright notice.
Only if the license under which the files are allows relicensing. BSDL
does not allow that. Yo
Am 15.02.2009 um 10:57 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Seems to be a nice tool. But this adds a dependance to Scons (and
remove
the dep to auto*)
Exactly. Plus, we'd need to rewrite everything that's build related -
again.
js told me he was trying to remove as much C and objc code from OSX
br
It's sad that you leave the team :(. You sure did a lot for Gajim and
you were definitely the "roster guy" :).
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/
A changelog would be nice.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> This will come when I'll have time and before real release
Ok.
> but it's funny that a dev do comments here.
Why that? Looking at a diff between 0.12.1 and 0.12.2 will result in a
rather long diff to review, so a changelog is nicer ;).
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
De
Am 14.05.2009 um 13:21 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
From now svn is no more used. I re-built mercurial repository from
start, and it's now perfectly similar to svn.
This is great news! Will have look at updating the OS X branch.
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Alessio Caiazza wrote:
> Doing so will be very simple to manage external MQ-patches' repo and
> forks.
You know, you can do that even without bitbucket. That's the point of
hg.
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gajim-devel ma
Hi!
The osx_newbuildsys branch has been there for way too long. It's time
to finally merge this into our default branch. Asterix already reviewed
the diff and seems to have no major objections anymore.
However, the branch uses a different build system because it was quite
troublesome to get autoc
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> I still have the same objections: using a build system that we cannot
> find in distributions
See audacious, conspire, etc. They include it in their distributions.
> that is used by 3 projects, which has no
> documentation,
The code should be pretty self-explaining.
Am 18.12.2009 um 13:16 schrieb Debarshi Ray:
People have been complaining about this in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544828
I must confess that I have been a bit busy with other projects to look
into this. Do you have any idea?
This is gtk related. gtk creates a segmen
Am 27.01.2010 um 10:09 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Hi all,
I'd like to do a meeting next week. It would be nice to talk about:
- 0.14 milestone (what to include (plugins?)
- What needs to be done to continue refactoring
- What each of us can / plan to do
- GSOC 2010
Any other ideas?
Is Monday ev
Am 27.01.2010 um 23:33 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
The latest Gajim in Debian Stable is 0.11.4. How old is that version?
Does it support STARTTLS? We've had reports of login problems with the
new server software at jabber.org (including disabling of port 5223).
It does, but it is horribly old a
Am 28.01.2010 um 08:10 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Gajim 0.11.4 is more than 2 years old and is not really maintained
anymore. But yes it's supposed to support STARTTLS. This idle thing is
not really a problem, it's quite impossible to reproduce it. But
that's
clearly not the problem Peter is d
Am 06.05.2010 um 13:46 schrieb Remigiusz Modrzejewski:
> Hi!
>
> It seems that development of the OS X branch is lagging behind.
Yes, I discontinued it, as I got tired of updating it all the time, as it was
stated that the branch is never going to get merged anyway.
Back when I started the bra
Am 12.04.2011 um 10:40 schrieb Zhihao Yuan:
> This is only on when there is no soundplayer (e.g., aplay, ossplay,
> esdplay...) found by gajim. Whenever you have one of them, my patch
> won't be executed.
When I have no soundplayer installed, it still might happen that I have other
applications
Am 23.05.2011 um 21:52 schrieb Zhihao Yuan:
> if the device is not in use,
> gajim only opens the device for 1 or 2 seconds.
Which is *EXACTLY* the problem. If I start my movie player and someone sends me
a message, I don't have any audio. Depending on how long the sounds is (4
seconds are nor
Am 24.05.2011 um 00:11 schrieb Zhihao Yuan:
> So? You mean an audio player that occupies the sound device for an
> hour is correctly but an IM software that borrows the device for
> seconds is incorrect?
Yes, I do. If my audio player is running, I want to listen to music, not get a
"Device is bu
Am 24.05.2011 um 19:45 schrieb Zhihao Yuan:
> I'm not sure whether you understand what Gajim does. If your audio
> player (the one only knows OSS) is running, gajim can not open the OSS
> device.
Exactly, so it opens the device for 3 - 4 seconds and I want to play an audio
file. My audio player
Am 25.05.2011 um 20:08 schrieb Zhihao Yuan:
> Which audio player you are using? It looks like it's forking itself to
> play the next file.
Why does that description sound to you like that at all? No, of course it does
not do that, why would it? It re-open's the device. Which is a pretty normal
Am 13.07.2011 um 11:46 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
> The only remaining change is ejabberd migration to the new server (that will
> be prosody) This will come next week.
+1 for that :). PEP works much better with Prosody.
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_
70 matches
Mail list logo
