Re: [Gajim-devel] changes in message_window.glade

2008-05-08 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
I already was pointed out to this mail shortly after it appeared and it's already fixed in SVN. @Henning: All shortcuts were working, like Ctrl-I or Ctrl-H. Only Alt-A wasn't working anymore, which is fixed in svn now. Hope this improves Gajim's usability for you. -- Jonathan signature.asc

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fixing Broken Windows

2008-05-25 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Stephan Erb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I look at gajim, I see the following broken windows: - OSX integration It's totally broken and I'm for reverting it and doing it from scratch. - OTR-Encryption We can keep that in trunk and just remove the line that loads the OTR module before

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fixing Broken Windows

2008-05-28 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Nikos Kouremenos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test yes it's one important thing. but I was thinking more like attracting a dev or at least an occasional patcher. else ok you find bug, but who will try to fix it and test it and close the ticket if noone from the devs cannot test on the platform?

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fixing Broken Windows

2008-05-29 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
I'd suggest that we branch in about 1 months and only add fixes to that branch then. If we'd use Mercurial instead of SVN, things would be much easier :/. A decentral VCS would be better anyway. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fixing Broken Windows

2008-05-29 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Nikos Kouremenos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no svn is more than fine. centralization is good for managing software such as Gajim. Gajim is not Mozilla nor Apache I *STRONGLY* disagree. Ever tried to work with SVN when you're in a train with your laptop, without any WLAN? You're screwed then.

Re: [Gajim-devel] DVCS [was: Re: Fixing Broken Windows]

2008-05-30 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Jeffrey Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried msysgit? I haven't tried it myself as I'm not a regular user of Windows. Doesn't sound too comfortable either. For Mercurial, there's even TortoiseHg which is as comfortable as TortoiseSvn :). And working with terminal apps on Windows is

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fixing Broken Windows

2008-06-05 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Well, you know that you moved the time now? Was that intended? 22 GMT is not 22 CEST :D. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel

Re: [Gajim-devel] Regular Meetings

2008-06-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Stephan Erb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about schedule regular meetings? Lets say every two weeks? Once a month should be more than enough, we're not developing *THAT* fast ;). -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel

Re: [Gajim-devel] Crypto authentication UI

2008-06-13 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Brendan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My suggestion: If you're in an encrypted chat but you haven't verified the identity, overlay a big red question mark on the encryption lock icon in the ChatControl and put a tooltip on it explaining the problem. Clicking on the question mark pops up a

Re: [Gajim-devel] dev-meeting

2008-06-28 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about monday 30th June, 7pm GMT (9pm CEST) ? I don't know yet if I got time there, but I'll try. Anyway, I'd suggest we don't have specific dates, but instead we should just start a conversation when enough developers are in the channel. So we can

Re: [Gajim-devel] dev-meeting

2008-06-28 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 28.06.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Nikos Kouremenos: that has problems. Which do you see with that? IMO, it's bad to only discuss issues once a month or so. At least, it sucks for those who can't attend it - we would at least need a detailed summary on the mailing liwst then. -- Jonathan

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Damien Thébault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I even replaced the resolver in the gajim code by a small wrapper and it's working well. I'd like to test the case here, the only case where there is a problem for me is with a google talk account (doesn't seems to use the resolver, is this the

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Damien Thébault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, let's put this code somewhere now :) I'll maybe post the patch for gajim if someone is interested. Feel free to post it here so it can be applied post-0.12. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Gajim-devel] 0.12-alpha version

2008-08-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Torsten Bronger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a release branch in the SVN? There is a tag. A branch will be done for beta. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org

[Gajim-devel] Any developers (or users) at FrOSCon?

2008-08-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Hi! I just wanted to ask if any of the developers (or users!) will be at FrOSCon on the 23th and 24th in St. Augustin (near Bonn, Germany)? For myself, there's a 99% chance that I'll be there :). -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Gajim-devel] Some licensing issues with 0.12-alpha

2008-08-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed it is a problem, but one of our previous dev don't want to release under GPLv3+ (some of his code is still in Gajim: optparser) Then we need to rewrite it. :/ -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Gajim-devel] Refactoring common/contacts.py

2008-11-24 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 24.11.2008 um 21:25 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: Best Regards, steve-e Uhm, did I miss something? Will comment on the rest later. -- Jonathan PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gajim-devel mailing list

Re: [Gajim-devel] Switch Gajim source repository to DVCS

2008-12-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.12.2008 um 14:46 schrieb Michal 'vorner' Vaner: I'm not saying it is problem of usability, but of familiarity. I'm able to, for example, edit the history before I push my commits, if I make mistake, with git. I do not think I can do this with hg. I do not say I can not do it. I just

Re: [Gajim-devel] [commit-gajim] r10863 - branches/gajim_0.12/po

2008-12-16 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 16.12.2008 um 22:50 schrieb Yavor Doganov: This is entirely inappropriate. There is nothing wrong in a partially translated program; otherwise msgfmt would consider untranslated/fuzzy messages a critical error. Removing incomplete translations has only nefarious effects: It is an insult to

[Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-19 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
the version 0.12 of Gajim is released. Changelog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog Thanks to Jonathan Schleifer, all patches are upstream. With this update I'm dropping maintainership, as I'm not really using gajim anymore, in favor of mcabber. Any takers? Besides 'make lib-depends

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-19 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: As it's not possiblt to have private mail, let's continue here. Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: Jonathan Schleifer a écrit : It's not. It's just that I want to show you that it's not true

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:07 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: You think more people are affected by this 30s timeout than by filetranfer? Really? I think more people use FT than are on a slow connection. Yes, definitely. You don't send files all the time. Besides, which problem with file transfers? I

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:53 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: If one dev get all complaints and don't forward them to bug tracker, I don't see how we could go forward ... I told you I got bug reports, but you always insisted that only I got the bug and the bug reports I received were bogus. Have you

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: That's not another personal attack, no, of course. How is stating that you said a personal attack? That said, I don't remeber having said that, and that doesn't prevent you to fix that. You did it in the mail before. You said you only have heard

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 21.12.2008 um 14:16 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: Where is it said that [I] always insisted that only [you] got the bug and the bug reports [you] received were bogus. I never said you didn't got any complaints, just that *I* never got. And I never talked about the bugreports you got ... But

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 22.12.2008 um 00:12 schrieb Matej Cepl: Get a mail client which complies with RFC 2369 -- just from the top my head -- Thunderbird does with https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4455 This is not an option as I use different MUAs. Claws-Mail seems to handle it like expected,

Re: [Gajim-devel] group windows by contacts groups

2009-01-13 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 13.01.2009 um 14:43 schrieb Serge Matveenko: Here is the patch for gajim-0.11.4 for sources from Ubuntu Hardy repo. Although patches are appreciated, please don't do them against a codebase into which no new features have been added for 3 years :). Please use 0.12.x or svn instead.

Re: [Gajim-devel] Licence incompatibility -- GPL and OpenSSL

2009-01-27 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 27.01.2009 um 14:29 schrieb Yavor Doganov: [I submitted this as a Trac ticket, but got Submission rejected due to potential spam or similar.] I believe Gajim is currently not distributable, as even an optional dependency on python-openssl requires the license of Gajim to have the (in)famous

Re: [Gajim-devel] Licence incompatibility -- GPL and OpenSSL

2009-01-27 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 27.01.2009 um 14:48 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: d8289 Additionally, GPL explicitely allows mere aggregation, so even our Windows binaries are no See also: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/ 29c7588fbecproblem, as OpenSSL is a separate DLL which is loaded at runtime

Re: [Gajim-devel] Licence incompatibility -- GPL and OpenSSL

2009-01-27 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 27.01.2009 um 14:56 schrieb Yavor Doganov: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: We do not ship with py-OpenSSL. We do not include any of the code from py-OpenSSL. I never said you did. Then I fail to see the problem. I don't see where we are violating

Re: [Gajim-devel] GSOC

2009-02-08 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 08.02.2009 um 14:55 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: Hi all, GSOC will arrive in the next monthes, so we can start thinking about project we could propose. So what new features would you like to see in Gajim ? We can discuss that on Wednesday at the end of the meeting. I think we should not

Re: [Gajim-devel] GSOC

2009-02-08 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 08.02.2009 um 14:55 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: Hi all, GSOC will arrive in the next monthes, so we can start thinking about project we could propose. So what new features would you like to see in Gajim ? We can discuss that on Wednesday at the end of the meeting. I think we should not

Re: [Gajim-devel] GSOC

2009-02-09 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 09.02.2009 um 07:04 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: codecs are handled by gstreamer, not sure we do a lot about that. I CC to liori who may have ideas about that. Ok, then another project would be to get all that running on Windows. I'm not so sure how well gstreamer runs on Windows, a while

Re: [Gajim-devel] Build system for Gajim

2009-02-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.02.2009 um 10:57 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: Seems to be a nice tool. But this adds a dependance to Scons (and remove the dep to auto*) Exactly. Plus, we'd need to rewrite everything that's build related - again. js told me he was trying to remove as much C and objc code from OSX

Re: [Gajim-devel] Leaving the team

2009-02-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
It's sad that you leave the team :(. You sure did a lot for Gajim and you were definitely the roster guy :). -- Jonathan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org

Re: [Gajim-devel] Gajim 0.12.2-alpha1

2009-05-02 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
A changelog would be nice. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel

Re: [Gajim-devel] Gajim 0.12.2-alpha1

2009-05-02 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: This will come when I'll have time and before real release Ok. but it's funny that a dev do comments here. Why that? Looking at a diff between 0.12.1 and 0.12.2 will result in a rather long diff to review, so a changelog is nicer ;). -- Jonathan

Re: [Gajim-devel] mercurial repository

2009-05-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 14.05.2009 um 13:21 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: From now svn is no more used. I re-built mercurial repository from start, and it's now perfectly similar to svn. This is great news! Will have look at updating the OS X branch. -- Jonathan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht

Re: [Gajim-devel] please mirror to bitbucket

2009-06-08 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Alessio Caiazza nol...@abisso.org wrote: Doing so will be very simple to manage external MQ-patches' repo and forks. You know, you can do that even without bitbucket. That's the point of hg. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[Gajim-devel] Merging the osx_newbuildsys branch

2009-07-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Hi! The osx_newbuildsys branch has been there for way too long. It's time to finally merge this into our default branch. Asterix already reviewed the diff and seems to have no major objections anymore. However, the branch uses a different build system because it was quite troublesome to get

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fatal error in IA__gtk_accel_groups_activate in gajim.py

2009-12-18 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 18.12.2009 um 13:16 schrieb Debarshi Ray: People have been complaining about this in Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544828 I must confess that I have been a bit busy with other projects to look into this. Do you have any idea? This is gtk related. gtk creates a

Re: [Gajim-devel] 0.11.4

2010-01-27 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 27.01.2010 um 23:33 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: The latest Gajim in Debian Stable is 0.11.4. How old is that version? Does it support STARTTLS? We've had reports of login problems with the new server software at jabber.org (including disabling of port 5223). It does, but it is horribly old

Re: [Gajim-devel] State of Gajim in OS X?

2010-05-06 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 06.05.2010 um 13:46 schrieb Remigiusz Modrzejewski: Hi! It seems that development of the OS X branch is lagging behind. Yes, I discontinued it, as I got tired of updating it all the time, as it was stated that the branch is never going to get merged anyway. Back when I started the

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fallback to OSS when no soundplayer found

2011-05-23 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 23.05.2011 um 21:52 schrieb Zhihao Yuan: if the device is not in use, gajim only opens the device for 1 or 2 seconds. Which is *EXACTLY* the problem. If I start my movie player and someone sends me a message, I don't have any audio. Depending on how long the sounds is (4 seconds are

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fallback to OSS when no soundplayer found

2011-05-24 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 24.05.2011 um 00:11 schrieb Zhihao Yuan: So? You mean an audio player that occupies the sound device for an hour is correctly but an IM software that borrows the device for seconds is incorrect? Yes, I do. If my audio player is running, I want to listen to music, not get a Device is busy

Re: [Gajim-devel] Fallback to OSS when no soundplayer found

2011-05-25 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 24.05.2011 um 19:45 schrieb Zhihao Yuan: I'm not sure whether you understand what Gajim does. If your audio player (the one only knows OSS) is running, gajim can not open the OSS device. Exactly, so it opens the device for 3 - 4 seconds and I want to play an audio file. My audio player

Re: [Gajim-devel] server migration

2011-07-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 13.07.2011 um 11:46 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: The only remaining change is ejabberd migration to the new server (that will be prosody) This will come next week. +1 for that :). PEP works much better with Prosody. -- Jonathan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht