On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:01:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will
> > point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns,
> > including me, have provided l
Should be fine now.
-Yosh
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:41:49PM +0400, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> seems rsync service doesn't working.
>
> 9:57[zeus]:/sai2/ftp/pub/unix/libs/graphics>/usr/local/bin/rsync --delete -vaz
> --exclude users/ ftp.gimp.org::ftp/ /sai2/ftp/pub/unix/graphics/gim
Forwarding due to list troubles...
-Yosh
- Forwarded message from Ben Liblit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Liblit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: binaries available from the Cooperative Bug Isolation Project
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:09:29 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:11:03PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> lets take a different approach.
>
> when you don't have the money to pay for the flight to represent the
> gimp at a conference or whatever the event, you won't be volunteering.
> i was unable to fund a flight to las vegas to represen
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:00:51PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I
> consider important) back on track.
>
> LOCATION
>
> So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development,
> each of which has some + points and some - points.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:09:04PM +, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > standard libray versioning scheme is to set soname to
> > > lib. (library being named lib..
> > > on filesystem)
> >
> > Don't get confused by the numbers, libgimp-2.0 is the librar
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:30:26PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > since the major is not anymore unique (eg gimp-2.0.23 will provide
> > > libgimp-2.0.so.23 with the same majo
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:13:30PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Roger Leigh writes:
> > They both have to implement fork() using Windows calls though,
> > which can never be efficient.
>
> (Just rambling here:)
>
> I wonder, could the typical fork() immeditaly followed by exec() (in
> the chil
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 04:57:15PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> But I don't think the actual time it takes to run gcc is what annoys
> people most when building stuff that uses auto*/libtool on
> Windows. For me, the most annoying part is libtool. This shell-script
> is mind-bogglingly slow. Runni
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
>
> Since it talks specifically about GIMP python,
> which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time in gimp 1.3
> (no kidding --- I've been on gimp 1.2 with my python fu stuff so far),
> it is interesting to mention that
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:24:54PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> > > Since it talks specifically about GIMP python,
> > > which me, by chan
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Not at all. GTK+ lived in the GIMP source tree until it was
> capable of being a standalone project. Afterwards, its main
> developers were gimp developers. Unfortunately, several of them
> followed the path which GTK+ has become to go
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> >>The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project.
> >But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and
> >compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for
> >historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wan
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 06:59:57PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Porting GTK2 to Quartz could bring some improvements but it isn't a
> prerequisite for a good user experience of The GIMP on Mac OS X. The
> one thing that is a lot more important at the moment is to fix bug
> #102058:
>
> http://bu
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:58:33PM +0100, Branko Collin wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2003, at 21:47, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:18:11 +0100, "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On 30 Dec 2003, at 9:48, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
>
> >>> I think that the goal was to move to
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:20:56PM +0100, Hans Breuer wrote:
> Am 27.12.2003 um 09:39 schrieb Manish Singh:
> >I just checked in an POSIX shm tile transport implementation. I'd like
> >someone on OS X to test it, since I'm not 100% sure how POSIX
> >compliant OS X
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David G??mez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've scanned some jpeg images with a 24bit depth. Some of them are old
> > photographies in black&white that show 'bands' when are displayed on
> > a 16 bit depth display. After
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:41:46AM +0100, David Odin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as you may know, the files libgimp/gimpmisc.[ch] have been split into
> libgimp/gimppixelfetcher.[ch] and libgimp/gimpregioniterator.[ch]. Can
> you do the necessary changes to keep cvs history for these files? This
> i
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> [restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff]
>
> GSR - FR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
> > > [technical discussion :)]
> > > I think I already explained why
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:13:19AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it
> > > just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes.
>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:51:17PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:24:15AM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the bulk of the code in gimp that causes warnings is stuff like:
>
> > void foo (void **p);
> >
> >
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 11:46:35PM -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> The 1.3.2 of the sample plug-in (gimp-plugin-template) uses some
> features that are deprecated in the latest CVS version of the GIMP. It
> is also missing an argument to one function call. The attached patch
> allows t
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 02:08:47AM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> > > scrolling, currently there doesn't seem to be ANY way to assign ANY keys
> > > at all to scrolling http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 ]
> >
> > I might be wrong but shouldn't you be able to specify keys for
> > scrol
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:14:10PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> Simons agruments, however, smell a lot of "standard gimp extension
> language", because his goal is to have one language that is always pat
> of gimp, which would effectively be a standard. I don't think that's a
> bad idea at all
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:43:00PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Meanwhile I've profiled gnumeric while waiting for the scrollwheel
> action to catch up and indeed it seems that the scrolling causes a lot
> of activity both in GTK and the X server with the activity in the X
> server being mostly bli
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:35:04AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:35:08PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > currently, and go beyond that with a full gtk and gimp binding. The
> > same should be done for python (I have plans to d
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Oh sure, out of all the bindings, perl comes closest by far to full
> > coverage. But iirc it doesn't wrap libgimpcolor, libgimpma
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:14:30PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
> > > it is going to be a tough act to follow robin rowe and cinepaint.
> >
> > I know you are funny sometimes but we all know Robin reads this list and
> > such
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:11:02PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 14 Mar 2004 02:50:09 +0100
>
>Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Fink and Darwinports are simply not options for mainline OS X
>> users. Mac users w
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:21:04PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> > I'll add something on the wiki as soon as my Gimp.app
> > source forge project gets accepted and I can put in a
> > link to it.
> >
> hmm, do we need to add the upload
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> [stuff deleted]
> >
> > The only thing that struck me as missing was the work involved with
> > porting the plug-ins to the new API, but Rapha?l already poin
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > [stuff deleted
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:34:02AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > For scheme we could do something like this:
> > >
> > > (
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:55:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Great. Now, when you say it I remember Sven mentioning it in the past.
> But I guess that this new interface is not exported yet to any of
> the language bindings? Is that correct? Any plans when this API
> will become active?
It
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:39:23AM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
> It is utterly ridiculous that simply because I voiced concerns about and
> would like for the ability to have gimp scripts execute properly from the
> command line under Windows that you accuse me of "making the GIMP suck".
> The sugges
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:01:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
> should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
> based on any particular language but just consists of:
>
> gimp_foo -bar 3 -baz yellow
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > A PDB revamp is planned.
>
> How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb,
> which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard
> any c
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:32:08PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Manish Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:48 PM
>
>
>
> > FWIW, the suggestion was ill-researched. (foo image=bar) is s
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 05:57:04PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
>
> > If it's important to you, you'll do the 10 mins of research and critical
> > thinking needed.
>
> Apparantly you could research this a whole lot faster than I can, which
> isn't surprising since you work with gimp development almo
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:20:14PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > - Do a 2.2 release in about three months.
> >
> > I think that's unrealistically short at this stage. There are people
> > who have said that they want to do some concrete and long-s
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:22:23PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:19:09PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While on that subject, I'm wondering what a good way of representing
> > named parameters in scheme and perl would be.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > > What requirements would the new PDB have?
> >
> > There's a number of iss
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >Helps for what? If libpdb is not our PDB redesign, what is it then?
>
> What is it? Rock?
>
> I may be misunderstanding what it is, but I understood that libpdb was an
> extra
> layer between the existi
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, something has to generate those coords, and something has to update
> > the UI before painting is finished.
> >
> > I was asking m
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:27:04AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:48:59PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what would be a good way for perl to support both named and positional
> > stuff?
>
> It simply shouldn't. It s
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just sent a mail to a gimp.org alias, and it bounced with the
> following problem:
The gimp.org postmaster address is a much more appropriate place for this
sort of thing than the developer list. Next time, use the pr
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:44:51AM -0700, Robin Rowe wrote:
> Dave,
>
> > It seems like you're limiting refactoring to code re-use via
> > extraction to libraries.
>
> No, I'm using the same definition that Mat refers to:
>
> "Refactoring is a disciplined technique for restructuring an existing
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:11:49PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> > But it's pretty
> > clear that you never bother to do any research before posting.
>
>
>
> > You must
> > have some weird sort of logic goes on in
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:19:20PM -0400, Christopher Curtis wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >snipped out: the fact that clueless Robin completely missed the point that
> >there was plenty of refactoring done into GPL libraries, quite independent
> >
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:18:02PM +1000, Owen wrote:
> I just built 2.1.0 with --enable-python but there was no python on the menus.
>
> So I went and built 2.0.1 --enable-python and configure failed because I didn't have
> pygtk
>
> Installed that and rebuilt both. Python now shows in the men
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:28:07PM -0300, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm having problems compiling Gimp 2.0.1 on my Conectiva Linux 9 machine.
>
> The error is:
>
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../app
> -I/usr/local/gtk+/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/glib/include/g
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 06:15:03PM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote:
>
> While starting each plugin as a separate process has it's advantages, gdb
> interaction is certainly not one of them.
>
> For example, right now I bring the plugin dialog up, then look up in the
> process list for it, and attach
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:08:23PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> struct _GPConfig
> {
> guint32 version;
> guint32 tile_width;
> guint32 tile_height;
> gint32 shm_ID;
> gdouble gamma;
> gint8install_cmap;
> gint8show_tool_tips;
> gint32 min_colors;
> gint32 gd
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:12:46PM -0700, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> thanks Sven and Carol for your answers... I'll get back to you with more
> details about the GUI, as i'm working on an art project at the moment,
> but to answer some immediate queries:
>
> - I'm using Photoshop 7.0 - stra
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 12.11.2004, at 15:51, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >That allows you to stuff more RAM into your box but you can still only
> >give up to 4GB to a single process simply because you cannot handle
> >more than 4GB in a 32bit address space.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:22PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
> Manish Singh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel, Sven, gimp-developer
> >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> >...
> >t's a whole bunch of contort
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 12.11.2004, at 18:51, Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >>You can, but not using the typical APIs. This is pretty important
> >>for database stuff
>
> >Whose use case is very different than GIMP&
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If this could be done today, that would be a great solution
> > (imho).
>
> I wouldn't wait for this to happen if I was you. The news system
> hasn't been resurrected for several
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:20PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > The news was fixed last night. The contest will be worked on soon.
>
> In case you hadn't noticed, we're due a release next week. How
> soon is soon?
Today.
> &
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:37:00PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:20PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > > In case you hadn't noticed, we're due a release next week. How
> > > soon is soon?
> &g
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:04:04PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:37:00PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > > If you want to do the work of changing all the places that things
> > > have been said now, be my gues
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:34:04PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a false start, the GIMP Splash Contest is now officially
> open!
>
> The contest runs until next Sunday, Midnight. Splash screens
> should be the same size as jimmac's logo and have a pale band
> across the bottom ro
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:49:43PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:36:29 +0100
>
>Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> There could be plenty of other reasons why, of course. But it isn't
>> FUD for
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:51:00AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
>
> >> Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
> >
> > mozilla ./file
> >
> > => file not acesssible (permission denied, other user, inaccessibl
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:56:16AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 27.02.2005, at 01:19, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >>just curious, is it expected that configuration of a GIMP
> >>build will fail if configure cannot find a C++ compiler?
>
> >That question would better be asked on the autoconf list.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:44:47AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 26.02.2005, at 23:44, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >What's wrong with $(top_builddir)?
>
> Ho hum. That's a relative path as well, so instead of
> -I.. that would be -I$(top_builddir)/app which gets
> expanded to -I../../app . We could
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:53:37AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 27.02.2005, at 01:14, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >We would probably have to add this to all Makefile.am in the app
> >subdirs then?!
>
> Only to those containing sources which refer to automatically
> generated headers, about 3 or 4.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 03:07:01AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 27.02.2005, at 02:50, Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >We should do -I$(top_builddir)/app. This avoids needing to care about
> >how deep the directory is, in case the directory is moved elsewhere.
>
> But that&
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >GIMP 1.2 is not any longer supported (for quite a while already). Your
> >best bet is to update to GIMP 2.2. That will also give you the benefit
> >that you don't any longer need to run an X
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:35:42PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Sven Neumann wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >&
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:57:49PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> >Andrei Simion wrote:
> >
> >
> At gimp.org they don't have downloads for 2.2. If you say it works,
> this is good. But why they don't say the same on the web site.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>If you'
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:18:21AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> Jay Cox a ?crit :
> >On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:41 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> >> - Work on a framework to make plug-in settings saveable across
> >>sessions (this might be done now, is it?)
> >
> >Persistent parasites can
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manish Singh a ?crit :
> >There are also persistent parasites that can be attached to the app.
> >This is how the png plugin stores its default settings currently. They
> >are backed by /parasiterc
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> mentor someone on the shapes tool, we need a mentor for the plug-in
> system. There is a related resource distribution project for gDesklets
> in the bounties already - some coordination might be possible.
I can do that. Anyone doing
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:48:33AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Sunday 19 June 2005 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I need to compile the list of things that bother me about the
> > GTK+ file chooser and submit it to bugzilla someday. I know I'm
> > not the only one being bothered with it's d
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:30:02PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Some symbols (including save_d) are missing in the latest update of
> aalib
Yes, the debian maintainer made a bogus change:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315606
Downgrade aalib for now.
-Yosh
___
lude "ft2build.h"
> +
> #include
> #include
Your libwmf library is too old. Upgrade.
> the autodetection of python on MSYS is not too good:
> the "\"es need to be replaced with "/"es, so I added this to
Where did it screw up? You sure you are using a CV
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:40:37PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
> On 6/28/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Changing stuff outside of gimp should be considered last resort.
> >
> > > which is still not perfect: I modified python.m4
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:02:54AM +0200, lode leroy wrote:
> >> the autodetection of python on MSYS is not too good:
> >> the "\"es need to be replaced with "/"es, so I added this to
> >
> >Where did it screw up? You sure you are using a CVS snapshot with all
> >the relevant changes? The ChangeLog
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:20:29PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>You are deleting the images, aren't you?
> >>
> >>No, in all tutorials I read they return the image to be saved at the
> >>end of the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:58:35PM -0400, woc wrote:
> On 8/24/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perl probably has similar limitations, to a certain extent. Perl
> > handles text best -- binary data, it's best at simply passing... I
> > believe the term is ad verbatim or something.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:49:50PM -0400, woc wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can use Perl or Python to write a file format plugin. Script-fu is a
> > nonstarter, there's no way to register a load/save handler from a script
> &g
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:34:28PM -0400, woc wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the python bindings are disted with GIMP, though not on Windows.
> > This will change with GIMP 2.4 though.
> >
> > If you care about Window
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:56:12AM -0500, Lance Dockins wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >And if you ask, please describe your problems in detail. I
> >have left my crystal ball at home today so I really can't figure out
> >what "some missing key libraries at the end of the build" are.
> >
> I was
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:28:49PM +0200, lode leroy wrote:
> When installing Python from Python-2.4.1.msi,
> the headers are not in C:/Python24/include/python24
> but in C:/Python24/include.
Well, this is fixed differently in 2.3.4. I'm assuming you're using
something older and neglected to chang
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:45:56AM +1100, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
> >On 12/21/05, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>example images of too much cleaveage for a mailing list kthx. there are
> >>women on this list too
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This is just
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Axel Wernicke wrote:
>
> Am 11.02.2006 um 15:14 schrieb Scott:
> >I am sure I will eventually fix GIMP or come up with a work around, at
> >which point I will forward the info on for your consumption.
>
> so, may be we should kick this issue to GIMP-dev a
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:03PM +, John Cupitt wrote:
> > Of course, OpenDocument document structure (ZIP archive with multiply
> > files inside) could be followed.
>
> Yes, this sounds much more sensible.
As a concept, yes. Actually using ZIP is a stupid decision, and I wonder
what the ra
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:36:41PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:03PM +, John Cupitt wrote:
> > > > Of course, OpenDocument document structure (ZIP archive with multiply
> > > >
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:43:12AM +0100, Kleistereimer wrote:
> how to use gimp_path_get_points from a python plugin?
>
>
> here some samplecode:
>
> def somefunc(image):
>
> floatarray = []
> for i in range(100):
> floatarray.append(0.0)
>
> closed = 0
> count = 0
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
> >
> >-Yosh
>
> I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
> the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
>
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >> By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it
> would make the whole thing even more complicated.
> >
> > One line of scheme to call your python script won
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:10:54PM +0200, Zephyr wrote:
> Hello,
> I wanted to compile My Very Own GIMP From CVS (TM) and play with the
> code, explore it etc. As it should be just my playground, I don't want
> to install it system-wide and possibly endanger my stable GIMP 2.2.10
> installed from R
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:03:48AM +0200, Alex Fernandez wrote:
> >i cannot give any kind of
> >logical reason for it and probably you should do the right thing and
> >trash this suggestion of mine.
>
> Yes, it is the usual email pollution.
You're guilty of the same. Looking at the archives, you
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:36:09PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
> > another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
> > advantage of their
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:24:48AM +0200, Omar wrote:
> Omar a ?crit :
> >Alexandre Prokoudine a ?crit :
> >>On 10/20/06, gg wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >>>
> all other toolkits that have tear-off menus
> >>>
> >>>'still interested to know what "all t
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:35:03AM +0100, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > I don't think however that the gfig plug-in has
> > anything to do with this.
> It does insofar, as it binds unnecessary develop-
> er resources. I have been using the Gimp now for
> sev
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
