The jpeg files that GIMP creates are perfectly valid. I think
the basic problem is that you are trying to use a camera as a
storage device, which is not its intended purpose. There are
some cameras that, when you take a picture, create a digital
watermark that the camera can use to tell if the
David Marrs wrote:
As for layer effects, well perhaps you should ask the users what it is
they get out of them. Who knows? You might learn something.
I think most of the developers already understand the value
of layer effects quite well. Let me try to summarize the current
situation. There
Sven wrote:
I can't remember if html files has been associated to crimson. May
be, but now aren't associated. I haved tried tipical solution:
unistall crimson, gimp, look for crimson association in the windows
register.
This is not at all about filetype association. GIMP help calls the
Cristian David wrote:
I downloaded the Picture Eastern Hemisphere 2048 by 2048 pixels
(7.1 MB TIFF) from
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/BlueMarble/ .
After this I tried to put another layer over the black part. But
what ever I tried, the black part of the picture covers it.
For people who would be interesting in learning a bit more about
this topic, it might be worth taking a look at the related help
docs,
http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch02s04s04.html
and
http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch04s03s05.html
Best,
-- Bill
__ __ __
Dana Silbera wrote:
In any case, the specific problem I'm getting is while colour balancing
of the final image, and each shift of the slider requires a bit over 20
seconds to complete the colour change over the image, which seems
slower than it should be. It's just a little difficult to
Gert Cuykens wrote:
is there somewhere a tool where you can type something like select
from 101*102 to 356*456
Well, you can open a script-fu console and use the gimp-rect-select
command (ugh). But no, there is no reasonable way to do it right
now.
Over the past few days I've coded up a
Sven wrote:
I don't know who's feeding you your information but
that person is highly misinformed since there are no vector layers.
If you want postscript or even pdf files using vectors instead of
bitmaps, you are looking at the wrong application. GIMP is an image
manipulation program for
I have been using GIMP for several years and just encountered a problem
that I had never seen before. I just bought a Canon Digital Rebel
(300D) and GIMP 2.0.0 is unable to open the JPEG files that it produces.
Most likely you are using a Linux distro (such as SuSE 9.1) that has
a buggy
MLF wrote:
In future versions of GIMP, I'd love to see a filter or series of
filters, that would help the user (especially the beginner) to turn
digital photos into 'hand-drawn' images. I realize that with some
talent and experience, a good GIMP user can already do this, but I am
just
Nick W wrote:
Right, thanks. I've worked out how to offset (only need the x offset)
but the clone tool has a cirle with a line through it? - looks like it
wont work for some reason?
If the clone tool cursor looks like that, it means you haven't
set the source to clone from: it can't copy
JCA wrote:
. . .
Most of the times, when I type some text in the text window, I get
nothing on the background, and not text layer is added.
. . .
This doesn't match any widely reported bug I know about. Of course
if you type black text on a black background, you won't see the
text, but
For what it's worth, Mozilla actually uses *Shift*-Ctrl-L
for Open Location, by default.
Best,
-- Bill
__ __ __ __
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
Calvin Spealman wrote:
If any of you have or know of any documentation,
perferably on the more recent versions of the format, it would be very much
appriciated.
You can still find the PhotoShop 6.0 SDK -- the last one that was
publically distributed -- at
Yemu wrote:
my question is: is it possible to have gimp in one window? like
in other graphic programs - not to mention photoshop or photo-paint. i found
something like regimp but this software is old now.
You might take a look at
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=3892
which is a plug-in
Matt wrote:
which is a plug-in called Windows Gimp Deweirdifyer. It is rather
deprecated by the GIMP developers because of the obnoxious name ...
How about calling it the Windows Gimp Unifier (if the Deweirdifyer name is
offensive and hinders its success.)
No offense :-)
I see that I may
I would like to re-integrate the Tool Option dialog but I didn't
succeeded.
How can I do this ?
See chapter 3.4 in the user manual (http://docs.gimp.org/en/).
Actually chapter 2.3.4.
We really need to come up with a better way of linking to
things in the Help docs :-).
Best,
--
Geoffrey wrote:
So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got some
digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi?? I selected to scale the
Sven Neumann wrote:
Aewyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But: running gimp, I got messages:
gimp-2.1:375: warning: can't find numbered character 160
uncountable.
I have never ever seen this message with any application. No idea what
could be causing this.
It's a font problem, somewhere a font
Adam Stein writes:
Many tools operate only on the selected region. It seems
Histogram is one that doesn't and that it always operates on the entire
image. Is there an easy way to have it operate only on a selected region?
I don't think so. It shouldn't be very hard to implement,
though,
Item: The EXIF Browser plug-in is not distributed with GIMP. (It may
be included in some packages, though.) It can be downloaded from the
GIMP Plugin Registry, at
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
Item: A digital camera image does not really have a true resolution.
Assigning one of
An update:
Thanks to Michael Schumacher I have been able to add a Windows
binary for the EXIF browser plug-in to the Registry:
exif-browser-bin.zip from
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
To install, just unzip it and place the unzipped version in
the plugins subdirectory of your personal
Niels van Bakel wrote:
How do you increase the line thickness of an object in an eps file? I
use the select tool to get the object I want to edit. I can use grow and
than fill the enlarged object. Is there a better way to do this?
The eps format is not really suitable for this sort of thing:
Adrian wrote:
I am scanning in some photos at a very large size. 23x35 inches, 300
dpi. The final output will be a poster of that size. In spite of my
best attempts there is always some dust someplace. I'm wondering if
there is an easy way to cover this without having to touch up each
Steve Crane wrote:
I am adapting a workflow from a Photoshop action and there is one step
that does haze removal with USM using radius 60, amount 0.30 and
threshold 1, that is extremely slow. I just timed it on a 94.4MB 4048x3040
photograph and it took 3 minutes, 50 seconds.
That sounds
Milos Prudek wrote:
I am guessing only but I'd say the tutorial forgets to mention that
the upper layer (the blurry one) needs to be set to Screen mode. I can
get a result that comes very close by following the tutorial and
changing the layer mode to Screen.
What can I say? That's exactly
Oskar Eyb wrote:
Hello,
the checkbox Save EXIF data is activated, but after saving the file
doesn't contain EXIF data any longer.
GIMP 2.0.3 Win32
Yes, you are right that it does not work: this is one of the
main reasons why Gimp 2.0.4 is going to be released very soon --
in the next few
Napoleon Ahiable writes:
I was trying to make a selection with a grey background colour
setting of R=127, G=127, and B=127. Trouble is i can not see the
outline of the shape whilst drawing an outline. It only appears
after i release the left mouse button [ . . . ] What can be done
about
Matthew Marshall wrote:
When I try to open jpeg images from my olympus stylus 400,
a box pops up saying:
Opening image file failed:
Plug-In could not open image
You didn't give enough information about your system for me to
be sure, but I bet you are seeing the bug described by the
Rick Pasotto wrote:
I have a fairly simple gif image that has various shades of
brown. I'd like to have the same image but with various shades
of grey instead. What would be the easiest way of doing this?
Is there an algorithmic way of converting the brown range to a
grey range? Given
Baard Ove Kopperud wrote:
A while back there was a question on this list wheter or not it
would be breaking any copyright to translate a PhotoShop-tutorial
about making a flame-effect to implement it under GIMP.
Unfortunately, I just re-installed my system, so I'm not sure where
the mails
Egon Brinken wrote:
How can I subtract one specific color from the picture layer, e.g. let the
uniform colored background be replaced by transparency?
The Color to Alpha filter does exactly what you want -- access it using
the menu path Filters - Colors - Color to Alpha.
Best,
-- Bill
Nem W Schlecht wrote:
Any update on this, Bill?
Thanks for the reminder. Okay, I have uploaded the code to the
Gimp Plug-In Registry, at:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4169
You should have a working gimptool-2.0 in order to install it.
Best,
-- Bill
__ __
Dynamic text is no longer needed, because the things it did are
now done by the regular text tool (and done a lot better, too!).
I don't know about the glow filter, but there are indeed some filters
that have not yet been ported from Gimp 1.2 to Gimp 2.0.
Best,
-- Bill
__
Well, the right place to ask is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- but a wild guess is that
it might help to run ldconfig, if you haven't done so.
Best,
-- Bill
__ __ __ __
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
For what it's worth, I went ahead and implemented a true variable blur filter,
by modifying the blur plug-in code from 2.0. I'll put the code in the plug-in
registry after a little bug-fixing, but anyway, I put together a comparison of
what you get with variable blurring versus what you get with
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Combining a blurred picture with an unblurred picture using layer mask
seems to work well for me. Of course it's not the same but it should
look reasonably similar.
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Just create an appropriate selection for the blur
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does not have the
ability to do this, although there are ways to fake something that looks sort of
like it. The easiest way to get it would be to modify the blur filter (found in
randomize.c in the plug-ins directory) so that the
38 matches
Mail list logo
