could proceed further with making it work ?
Thanks in advance,
PiBa-NL
on what might need to change, what to
test or how i could proceed further with making it work ?
Thanks in advance,
PiBa-NL
HAproxy should in step 4 somehow get the SYN-ack
packet, im not sure if it should listen/bind on all local IP's or if the
traffic should get passed back to a HAProxy port by using for example a
NAT rule.?.
PiBa-NL
Op 17-4-2013 21:21, Baptiste schreef:
Hi,
In order to work in transparent proxy
1260,sackOK,TS
val 145638 ecr 92963], length 0
Those last three packets should not go towards the browser pc..
Op 17-4-2013 21:55, PiBa-NL schreef:
Hi Baptiste,
Thanks for your reply, i understand that the traffic must pass through
the router/HAProxy box, and for that part i can confirm
to remove the encryption and then be able to use
'http' mode processing.
|bind :443 ssl crt /etc/haproxy/site.pem
|
-PiBa-NL
Op 24-4-2013 18:35, Bryan Talbot schreef:
Since the traffic passing through your port 443 is presumably
encrypted, by design, the proxy can't do anything
/server
*set weight
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#9-set%20weight*backend/serverweight[%]
But i think it wont allow you to add new servers.. Nor change the
loadbalancing algorithm.
Greets PiBa-NL
Op 24-4-2013 20:15, Dave Ariens schreef:
Hi subs,
I've looked around
:
-use send-proxy and accept-proxy for the connection between HAProxyB and
HAProxyA
PiBa-NL
Op 25-4-2013 19:29, Wei Kong schreef:
Hi,
We have an haproxy (A)in front of ngnix and it has been working great
and we can get the client ip without any problem
HAProxy A - Nginx
Recently we added
IP_FREEBIND 15
#endif /* !IP_FREEBIND */
Op 26-4-2013 8:33, Willy Tarreau schreef:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:55:23AM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi All / Developers,
Seams i have tranparent proxying working now on FreeBSD 8.3 with
HAProxy1.5dev18 + small modification.
Needed to add a firewall
to make these changes. Is this the way to go?
Thanks for reviewing my proposed changes sofar.
PiBa-NL
Op 26-4-2013 22:40, Willy Tarreau schreef:
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:26:33PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
throwing in my two cents here, based on a few uneducated guesses reading
Hi Willy,
Ill give it a try and send the patch as an attachment, though im not
100% comfortable with the code. I think i can do it.
Will take me a few days though..
Thanks sofar.
Op 26-4-2013 23:12, Willy Tarreau schreef:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:03:00PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi Willy
/haproxy.git ..)
-FreeBSD IP_BINDANY diff -urN.patch generated with diff -urN (against
the 'port source')
I hope one of them can be used by you.
Please take a look and comment if something is amiss.
Greetings
PiBa-NL
Op 26-4-2013 23:40, PiBa-NL schreef:
Hi Willy,
Ill give it a try and send the patch
Hi Chriss,
That seams possible already.?.
If you have the configuration for SSL offloading configured already all
you need to add is the ssl option to your backend servers.
--
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#5.2
--
*ssl
For the better/cleaner fix this one should be usable [2]:
http://marc.info/?l=haproxym=136707895800761w=2 , which is what i
would like to get committed to the main HAProxy source tree.
@Willy could you take a look at the patch attached to that mail [2] ?
Greets,
PiBa-NL
Op 2-5-2013 5:13, ZeN
can help better. But hope
this helps in the 'debugging' a bit :).
Also i found it usefull to start haproxy with the -d -V parameters to
show on-screen what happens (told me it couldnt bind to a nonlocal ip at
first tries..).
Greets
PiBa-NL
Hi Willy,
Could you please let me know what your findings are about the proposed
patch?
Does it need some more work, is it implemented wrongly, or would it help
if i send my current haproxy.cfg file?
If i need to change something please let me know, thanks.
Thanks for your time,
PiBa-NL
Op
i
configured the 'ipfw' firewall/nat to make it work.
p.s.
Ive spotted a issue in my patch with the IPv6 part where i forgot about
the OpenBSD part (SOL_SOCKET SO_BINDANY) should probably be added
there also.
PiBa-NL
Op 8-5-2013 20:18, Willy Tarreau schreef:
Hi,
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07
Hi Willy,
Thanks the patches look good, and when applied separately all compile
without issues on FreeBSD. (Except when using the USE_LINUX_TPROXY flag,
but that shouldn't be used on FreeBSD anyway.)
And transparent proxying works correctly on FreeBSD as was expected.
Ive included a
Hi Joe,
Sounds like you need the 'ssl' option for your backend server.
This option enables SSL ciphering on outgoing connections to the server.
Just below the source option:
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#5-source
(#5-ssl goes to wrong part of the help.. for
a request to
http://haproxy/jboss/index.html to http://jbossserver/index.html , is
that indeed what you want/expect? im not sure thats actually possible..
(also thinking about links send in a response would not point to the
subfolder.)
greets PiBa-NL
Op 19-6-2013 23:26, Lukas Tribus schreef:
Hi
if there
is a good workaround / secondary up to date repository.
PiBa-NL
Op 22-6-2013 1:22, Lukas Tribus schreef:
Hi!
When trying to clone the repository it always seems to fail. (there have
been more reports of this in emails/irc of other users..)
Also it seams to take ages before it fails..
I'm using
required settings (config if it changes) when
you manage to get it working.
Greetings PiBa-NL
Op 9-7-2013 12:55, jinge schreef:
Hi,all!
We use haproxy and FreeBSD for our cache system. And we want to use
the transparent option
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#4-option
that
still contains the problem you currently experience?
Greets PiBa-NL
Op 11-7-2013 14:38, Baptiste schreef:
So the problem might be in the way you compiled HAProxy or you have
configured your OS.
Unfortunately, I can't help on FreeBSD :'(
Baptiste
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:55 AM, jinge altman87
If this can actually work, i currently do not know.. My only FreeBSD 9
pf knowledge is from reading its manual. So cant help with that.
If you do manage to get the divert-to working please do share it with us.
Greets PiBa-NL
Op 12-7-2013 7:37, jinge schreef:
Hi PiBa-NL,
I just follow your
(or is that some higher HAproxy logic/failsafe im missing?)
Greets PiBa-NL
Haven't tried that one recently, but found
http://master.formilux.org/git/people/willy/haproxy.git to be a bit
faster and at least completing the clone without an error. Maybe it helps.
Greets PiBa-NL
Pawel schreef op 28-11-2013 4:33:
On Nov 27, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Charles Strahan
Simon Drake schreef op 27-12-2013 17:07:
/
/
/Would it be possible to post an example showing the correct haproxy
config to use with the agent-check.
/
/By the way I saw the mailing list post recently about the changes to
the agent-check, using state and percentage, and I think that the
for others.
Greets PiBa-NL
Lukas Tribus schreef op 3-1-2014 22:41:
Hi,
Hello ,
Many thanks for your replay. This thing is more stranger i downloaded and
compiled serverl versions of HAproxy 1.5.x.x and the result was alwase the
same
I experimented with following versions
At first i testing
be made for some final bug fix
checks...
Greets PiBa-NL
Find below part of the 1.5dev20 release mail from Willy as the
mailinglist archives are not containing this.. (followed a day later by
dev21 to fix a small but annoying issue):
I expect to release 1.5-final around January and mostly
Hi,
While reading about stickyness its seems like there are quite a few options.
*TCP*
1- balance source
2- stick on src
*SSL*
3- stick on payload_lv(43,1) if clienthello
*HTTP/SSLoffloading*
4- cookie cookie
5- stick on req.cook(cookie)
6- appsession cookie
But while the last 3 options can all
2000 rise 2 fall 3 minconn 0 maxconn 0
on-marked-down shutdown-sessions
On 27 December 2013 22:44, PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com wrote:
Simon Drake schreef op 27-12-2013 17:07:
Would it be possible to post an example showing the correct haproxy config
to use with the agent-check.
By the way
Ok seems my trouble came from using balancestatic-rr.
Actually when using the unix socket to set a weight to 50% it tells:
Backend is using a static LB algorithm and only accepts weights '0%'
and '100%'.
So that explains my issue.
Abd the manual states Each server is used in
When using the backens with port 443 do you have the ssl keyword on
the server line?
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#5.2-ssl
Also can you share your complete (anonimized) haproxy configuration file?
Kobus Bensch schreef op 13-1-2014 12:27:
A few more observations:
to see if servers are
properly checked as 'up' by haproxy.
Greets PiBa-NL
Florian Engelmann schreef op 16-1-2014 12:29:
Hi,
I got two configurations the should do the same. One is based on a
frontend/backend layout the second does it with just listen. The
listen configuratiuon is working
= -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DFREEBSD_PORTS
OPTIONS = USE_GETADDRINFO=1 USE_ZLIB=1 USE_OPENSSL=1 USE_STATIC_PCRE=1
Did i do something wrong, or can you give it a test.? Thanks.
Thanks for the great product!
Greets PiBa-NL
.
I knew that the comma didn't need escaping but started to try it anyway
because it didn't seem to work, and so started to have a few doubts..
Sorry for the noise and thanks, again.
PiBa-NL
Thierry FOURNIER schreef op 17-1-2014 11:25:
Hi,
First, you must not escape the comma character
on the same machine and then
testing? Or is 1 running production and the other is under a
test.domain.name? Maybe the backend sends a different reply if the
request Host header is different..?
Greets PiBa-NL
Florian Engelmann schreef op 17-1-2014 13:43:
Hi PiBa-NL,
Found a a minor difference
can automate that, and if not at least put a
warning note that this kind of rule must be added for it to work properly.
Can you confirm this indeed solves the issue?
Thanks PiBa-NL
Magnus Thomé schreef op 18-1-2014 9:32:
Last night during a couple of hours I took the time to read through
.
As for the current 'workaround', you can probably make an alias with all
ip's you want to affect and use that in the floating-rule. I haven't
tested it but cant think of a reason why that wouldn't work..
Greets PiBa-NL
Magnus Thomé schreef op 19-1-2014 9:45:
Yee!
THANK YOU!!!
Works
just4hapr...@t-online.de schreef op 20-1-2014 20:59:
server backend_server_1 server_ip:1 check-ssl
server backend_server_2 server_ip:1 check-ssl
Try it like this:
server backend_server_1 server_ip:1 check check-ssl
server backend_server_2 server_ip:1 check
100 expire 60s
stick on src
server www01 127.0.0.1 check observe layer7
server www02 127.0.0.2 check observe layer7
server www03 127.0.0.3 check observe layer7
Greets PiBa-NL
Michael Johnson - MJ schreef op 21-1-2014 21:57:
Is there a way to limit the number of sticky connections
Im not 100% sure but if i remember something i read correctly it was
like using a stick on dst stick-table.
That way the sticktable will make sure all traffic go's to a single
server, and only when it fails another server will be put in the
sticktable that will only have 1 entry.
You might
ok found it again in the part about Automatic failover without failback
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2014/01/17/emulating-activepassing-application-clustering-with-haproxy/
PiBa-NL schreef op 30-1-2014 19:14:
Im not 100% sure but if i remember something i read correctly it was
like using a stick
This should (i expect) work with any number of backup servers, as long
as you only need 1 active.
Ryan O'Hara schreef op 30-1-2014 19:34:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:14:30PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
Im not 100% sure but if i remember something i read correctly it was
like using a stick on dst
I think this is the issue in the mode http frontend:
req_ssl_hello_type : integer (deprecated)
this will not work with bind lines having the ssl
Patrick Hemmer schreef op 14-2-2014 22:34:
You haven't told it to use SSL when talking to the servers listening
on :4443. By default haproxy is
programs/scripts/tools to also keep
historical/cumulative data for haproxy and can share their experience
with it?
Greets PiBa-NL
Andreas Mock schreef op 28-2-2014 16:33:
Hi all,
the list is normally really responsive. In this case nobody
gave an answer. So, I don't know whether my question
, and seen a previous question
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/11942 which seems to
have gone without a final solution as well.
So the question is, is this possible or might there be some issues in
'converting' the checks?
Thanks for your time.
Greets PiBa-NL
Baptiste schreef op 28-2
sense, just not for 'textual' protocols.
Thanks for investigating.
PiBa-NL
Willy Tarreau schreef op 4-3-2014 17:28:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 04:51:56PM +0100, Thierry FOURNIER wrote:
The match bin get the configuration string 474554 and convert it as
the binary sequence GET. The match str get
About 3 and 4 i have no clue..
Greets
PiBa-NL
k simon schreef op 20-3-2014 16:12:
Hi,lists,
I tested dev22 on FreeBSD 10-stable recently, and found:
1. ipfw fwd works well with dev22+tproxy. It's have a nice guide in
the /usr/local/share/examples.
But pf's divert-to and divert-reply can't
is
handled.
Greets PiBa-NL
is
handled.
Greets PiBa-NL
to send the requests to the
proper backend. The purpose would be to minimize the load on haproxy
itself, while maximizing supported clients (XP and older mobile devices).
Thanks in advance.
PiBa-NL
global
daemon
gid80
ssl-server-verify none
tune.ssl.default-dh-param 1024
maximizing supported clients (XP and older mobile devices).
Thanks in advance.
PiBa-NL
global
daemon
gid80
ssl-server-verify none
tune.ssl.default-dh-param 1024
chroot/tmp/haproxy_chroot
defaults
timeout connect3
timeout server
work i would add a listen section for stats to
check if haproxy does 'see' the servers are 'up'.
Greets PiBa-NL
Fraj KALLEL schreef op 27-8-2014 18:05:
hello,
i use postfix 2.11 and haproxy 1.5 for setting up cluster smtp.
above is my configuration and the cluster doesn't work.
have you any
something wrong, is the blog outdated, or was a bug
introduced somewhere?
If more information perhaps -vv or full config is needed let me know,
thanks for any reply.
p.s. did anyone get my other emails a while back? [1]
Kind regards,
PiBa-NL
[0]
http://blog.haproxy.com/2013/04/26/wordpress
Baptiste schreef op 7-9-2014 17:13:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:55 PM, PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
Thanks that fixes my issue indeed with the following:
tcp-request inspect-delay 10s
tcp-request content track-sc1 base32+src if METH_GET wp_login
tcp
Zebra schreef op 16-9-2014 2:58:
Hi,all
I configure one back-end using tcp mode,and I want to ssh the
server(s) behind the back-end just for testing. So I used check-ssl to
enable ssl check.
backend ssh_servers
mode tcp
server server2 192.168.10.95:22 check-ssl check
Zebra schreef op 16-9-2014 3:08:
Hi,all
I configure the backend with one server and want to make the health
check for it using tcp.And the configuration as below.
backend httpservers
option tcp-check
This actually makes it perform tests on a higher layer: Perform health
checks using
.
Zebra schreef op 16-9-2014 3:53:
Hi, PiBa-NL
Thank you for your reply .
But I used tcpdump and find the check only try to make one tcp
three-way handshake and even the packet for tcp ACK will not send.
This is the result :
root@ubuntuforhaproxy:/home# tcpdump -lnvvvXei eth0 tcp port 22
Hi Dennis,
option tcp-check that requires more send/expect options to actually perform
L7 checks.
For a simple L4 check remove the line completely or add : tcp-check connect
You might also want to look at option httpchk. Which is more friendly for basic
http checks.
Greets PiBa-NL
Dennis
Take a look at 'non-stick' and or 'on-marked-up
shutdown-backup-sessions' they might help with your issue.
Another option could be to remove the backup server from your config,
and serve the static page with 'errorfile 503
/etc/haproxy/errorfiles/503sorry.http'.
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
[PATCH] DOC: httplog does not support 'no'
Modified: doc/configuration.txt
doc/configuration.txt | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index aa6baab..5dc3afa 100644
--- a/doc/configuration.txt
+++
Yosef Amir schreef op 1-1-2015 om 13:57:
Hi ,
I have servers that listen for plain IMAP on port 143 and servers that
listen for IMAP SSL on port 443.
I have successfully tested HAProxy for tcp-check proxying to IMAP
servers listen on port 143 .
I don’t know how to configure the option
Nick Couchman schreef op 6-2-2015 om 23:52:
It's hard to figure out exactly how to phrase what I'm trying to do, but I essentially
need a configuration for HAProxy where I can pin the load-balancing of one
front-end port to another one, so that both go to the same back-end port. Here's what
Thing to check, what happens to concurrent connection requests?
My guess is with 10 concurrent requests it might take up to 20
seconds(worst case for 10 connections) for some requests instead of the
expected max 2..
Thierry FOURNIER schreef op 18-6-2015 om 19:35:
Hi,
You can do this with
Jun 2015 20:27:07 +0200
PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com wrote:
Thing to check, what happens to concurrent connection requests?
My guess is with 10 concurrent requests it might take up to 20
seconds(worst case for 10 connections) for some requests instead of the
expected max 2..
Note that we don't
()
end
Thierry FOURNIER schreef op 19-6-2015 om 14:22:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 02:05:50 +0200
PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm sure i am abusing lua for completely wrong thing here.
But i do not understand why the result isn't at least consistent..
Ive got a Pinguïns.jpg
Hi guys,
I'm sure i am abusing lua for completely wrong thing here.
But i do not understand why the result isn't at least consistent..
Ive got a Pinguïns.jpg of 759kB (Default Windows 7 example image)..
And have the configuration listed below.
When requesting the image from a browser the top of
16, 2015 at 4:39 PM, PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com
mailto:piba.nl@gmail.com wrote:
Which does not prevent the backend from using mode http as the
defaults section sets.
CJ Ess schreef op 16-6-2015 om 22:36:
mode tcp is already present in mainfrontend definition below
Which does not prevent the backend from using mode http as the defaults
section sets.
CJ Ess schreef op 16-6-2015 om 22:36:
mode tcp is already present in mainfrontend definition below the
bind statement
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:05 PM, PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com
mailto:piba.nl
Matthew Cox schreef op 15-6-2015 om 20:05:
Hello,
I've been trying to diagnose an odd issue with HAProxy (1.5.x)
statistics and SSL. I'm seeing clients having problems with the SSL
negotiation. When digging with openssl, there seems to be a clear text
http 1.x response which causes the
CJ Ess schreef op 15-6-2015 om 20:52:
This one has me stumped - I'm trying to proxy SMTP connections however
I'm getting an HTTP response when I try to connect to port 25 (even
though I've done mode tcp).
This is the smallest subset that reproduced the problem - I can make
this work by doing
Hi,
Ive found some inconsistencies in the documentation, patch attached.
Could you take a look and merge it? Thanks.
Regards,
PiBa-NL
From 007f377f637dbafc47cb77f6650e4df55e08b608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pieter Baauw piba.nl@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:26:24 +0200
Subject
Hi Guys,
Patch attached to correct the mailer warning text to show the right
names to the user.
Regards,
PiBa-NL
From aa2cccdf5e95d2850692ec8189fc9ed20a586575 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pieter Baauw piba.nl@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:45:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MINOR
bump?
Doorgestuurd bericht
Onderwerp: request for comment - [PATCH] MEDIUM: mailer: retry sending
a mail up to 3 times
Datum: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:08:41 +0200
Van:PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com
Aan:HAproxy Mailing Lists haproxy@formilux.org
Hi guys,
Ive created
I believe you need 1.6-dev3 for that:
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.6.html#5.2-sni
Jim Gronowski schreef op 23-7-2015 om 23:20:
I’m trying to do health checks on a site that is served with SNI – so
going directly to the IP generates a 404 – the backend server is
Hi Willy,
Please check attached patch to solve not being able to send a mail to a
exchange server as discussed in previous mail thread.
http://marc.info/?l=haproxym=143708032708431w=2
Is it correct like this?
Thanks for the great software :).
Regards,
Pieter
From
It looks to me as if the dot is send in the wrong place.
Attached patch would fix that.
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
the character sequence CRLF.CRLF ends the mail text.
Could you guy's take a look?
mlist schreef op 15-7-2015 om 14:23:
At the end of each smtp session, we see a packet
Hi Thierry, haproxy-list,
Op 19-10-2015 om 11:24 schreef thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:31:42 +0200
PiBa-NL <piba.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Op 18-10-2015 om 21:37 schreef thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 00:07:13 +0200
PiBa-NL &l
for the more native English
speaking/writing people.
I haven't tried to check it myself, but didn't see it in either of the
documents how often is a function from core.register_task called? Or
should it contain a loop+sleep ? Perhaps a small example could be added?
Regards
PiBa-NL
HAProxy
b.t.w. if sole purpose of the frontend is to echo the ip back to the client.
You should probably also check the 'use-service' applet syntax, i dont
know if that could be faster for your purpose.
Then another thing to check would be if you want to use the tcp or http
service mode. A TCP service
Hi List, Willy,
Attached some small example fixes, spelling correction.
Hope its ok like this :).
Regards,
PiBa-NL
From fdecc44b9bf94bfaceb9d0335ea3a185e575cd86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pieter Baauw <piba.nl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 16:38:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] DOC: l
Forgot to include list, sorry.
Op 8-11-2015 om 17:33 schreef PiBa-NL:
Hi Ben, Willy, Simon,
Ben, thanks for the review.
Hoping 'release pressure' has cleared for Willy i'm resending the
patch now, with with your comments incorporated.
CC, to Simon as maintainer of mailers part so he can
Forgot to include list, sorry. And then the attachment dropped of..
Resending.
Op 8-11-2015 om 17:33 schreef PiBa-NL:
Hi Ben, Willy, Simon,
Ben, thanks for the review.
Hoping 'release pressure' has cleared for Willy i'm resending the
patch now, with with your comments incorporated.
CC
Hi Willy,
Op 16-11-2015 om 7:20 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:13:50AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
-but check->conn->flags & 0xFF is a bit of s guess from observing the
flags when it could connect but the server did not respond
properly.. is there a other
Hi Willy,
Op 15-11-2015 om 8:48 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Pieter,
I'm just seeing this part in your description while merging
the patch :
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:19:21PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
HOWEVER.
-i have not checked for memoryleaks, sockets not being closed properly
(i dont know how
onfig:
frontend tcp-echo
bind 127.0.2.1:1610
timeout client 1
mode tcp
tcp-request content lua.tcp-echo
Testing this with ab frequently hangs and times out even at tiny loads
(10 requests with concurrency 3).
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015, 10:19, PiBa-NL <piba.nl..
Op 2-11-2015 om 10:03 schreef Thierry FOURNIER:
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:22:14 +0100
PiBa-NL <piba.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thierry, haproxy-list,
Hi Pieter,
Hi Thierry,
I've created another possibly interesting lua script, and it works :)
(mostly). (on my test machine..)
When i
as i could tell. Anyway less warnings is better.
include/common/mini-clist.h:114:9: warning: 'LIST_PREV' macro redefined
#define LIST_PREV(lh, pt, el) (LIST_ELEM((lh)->p, pt, el))
Second patch i confirm fixes the core dump.
Thanks as always!
Regards,
PiBa-NL
Thierry
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 20:50
Hi Thierry, haproxy-list,
I've created another possibly interesting lua script, and it works :)
(mostly). (on my test machine..)
When i visit the 192.168.0.120:9003 website i always see the 'Hello
World' page. So in that regard this is usable, it is left to the browser
to send the request
Hi Thierry,
Op 18-10-2015 om 21:37 schreef thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 00:07:13 +0200
PiBa-NL <piba.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi haproxy list,
For testing purposes i am trying to 'modify' a response of a webserver
but only having limited success. Is this su
Hi All,
Op 7-10-2015 om 0:31 schreef PiBa-NL:
Hi Thierry,
Op 6-10-2015 om 9:47 schreef Thierry FOURNIER:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:04:08 +0200
PiBa-NL <piba.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Hi Pieter,
With or without "option http-server-close" does not seem to make any
di
Hi Willy,
Op 12-10-2015 om 7:28 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:22:48AM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
#1 0x00417388 in buffer_slow_realign (buf=0x7d3c90) at
src/buffer.c:166
block1 = -3306
block2 = 0
I'm puzzled by this above, no block
hod embbed a limitation: if some servers are declared in the
backend, the "option http-server-close" forbid the keepalive between
haproxy and the serveur.
Can you test with this option ?
Thierry
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:00:45 +0200
Cyril Bonté <cyril.bo...@free.fr> wrote
Hi Willy,
Op 12-10-2015 om 23:06 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:29:05PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
Been running some more tests with the information that req->buf->i
should be >= 0.
What i find is that after 1 request i already see rqh=-103 , it s
Hi Thierry,
Op 6-10-2015 om 9:47 schreef Thierry FOURNIER:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:04:08 +0200
PiBa-NL <piba.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Hi Pieter,
With or without "option http-server-close" does not seem to make any
difference.
Sure, it is only an answer to the
ported
the issue..)
Anyway i burned some more hours on both your and my side than was
probably needed.
One more issue gone :)
Thanks for the support!
PiBa-NL
Technically its possible bind the stats socked on a tcp port iirc, do
make sure to either bind it on 127.0.0.1 or firewall it properly.
I have no clue if those admin tools can use tcp connection to perform
their administration tasks..
Op 18-11-2015 om 17:03 schreef Pavlos Parissis:
On
Hi guys,
Hoping someone can shed some light on what i might be doing wrong?
Or is there something in FreeBSD that might be causing the trouble with
the new resolvers options?
Thanks in advance.
PiBa-NL
haproxy -f /var/haproxy.cfg -d
[ALERT] 248/222758 (22942) : SSLv3 support requested
Op 7-9-2015 om 23:06 schreef Baptiste:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:12 PM, PiBa-NL <piba.nl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Remi and Baptiste / haproxy users,
Thanks for the quick fix for socket issues.
Haproxy now starts succesfull and sends some DNS requests successfully.
However the google b
forget to add the patch "get_addr_len(>addr)" Remi
created ;) its not yet in todays list of dns patches. But maybe im just
a bit to eager now :) .
Keep up the good work!
Thanks.
PiBa-NL
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo
