'JESINTERFACE:EVEL 2'
They spelled 'EVIL' wrong, didn't they?
--
Tom Schmidt
(I'm still working on EVIL1)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:17:33 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 10:23:17 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
You should be using 'JESINTERFACE:EVEL 2'
They spelled 'EVIL' wrong, didn't they?
Mr. Knievel might disagree. :-)
So you need to be a daredevil to want
and not much
in terms of Oracle skill sets either. Nothing to bother writing home about
anyway.
If any company is considering a move from z/OS and DB2 to SQL Server or Oracle
I
would truly want to know about it.
--
Tom Schmidt
require the cracker to physically possess something
presumably uniquely identifiable. (Like a physical key but usually
electronic.)
It isn't so much that good guys are getting harder to find as it is that bad
guys are getting a little bit sneakier.
--
Tom Schmidt
is the TXSeries product,
circa 1998.
(Does Rich run it as a unix daemon on his z/OS 1.7 system, maybe?!??)
Meanwhile, we have a CICS 2.1.2 region up under a z/OS 1.8 system here. (It
will not die.)
--
Tom Schmidt
if it was ALWAYS working from the viewpoint
of recovery.
--
Tom Schmidt
(That last paragraph should provoke some fun discussion.)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
, but there is another path that works... for me
and for Cwi, too. (Once might be lucky but more than once in a row is
repeatable.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
of defining a fresh CFRM at the DR site; I dispute the
widely held belief that there is no other option.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.)
--
Tom Schmidt
(DB2 should then rebuild in the new structure in the new CF.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
Report: HP to buy EDS for $12-13 billion (possibly to be announced as early as
tomorrow?)
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9942051-7.html
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
the trick!
--
Tom Schmidt
(We had a similar issue with our shiny new z10 on Sunday morning and all we
needed to
do was force the structures that did NOT contain the (PND) suffix in the
display. Presto!)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
customize that
field. I won't be surprised if many on this list are unaware of it.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
any compelling reason why customers would want to have to
maintain such a value. (Customers don't see other customers' dumps so they
don't have the need.)
Perhaps some ISVs use the license key values to accomplish Todd's goal?
--
Tom Schmidt
On Sun, 4 May 2008 15:39:47 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 16:23 -0500 on 05/03/2008, Tom Schmidt wrote about Re: SVC99:
I suspect that the problem your program is having has less to do
with the SYSDSN enqueue that S99WTDSN was designed to cope with, and
more to do with the SYSVSAM enqueue
enqueue that Catalog management and VSAM use for proper serialization during
the
catalog compression processes. I do not recall any user control over that
SYSVSAM
intersect via SVC99.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN
the bandwidth to support NDM eating
half an engine; if the bottleneck is in the pipe then they won't necessarily
see
ugly CPU consumption.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
of a contract issue with the creative programmer and not
so much a technical contest?
We all read post here to both seek share our knowledge, don't we? Or
have I completely misunderstood ibm-main's purpose?
--
Tom Schmidt
with a camera (or continuous video) to capture the
data for post-processing by OCR software. (I do something very similar with
my genealogy hobby... not terribly difficult or expensive if you are
determined.)
--
Tom Schmidt
(BTW, I know of a company nearby that has a policy prohibiting
on the screen. Many TN3270 packages may even provide sample code with
the distribution.
Either you trust your programmer's ethics or you shouldn't provide access to
the treasured source. There is no in between.
--
Tom Schmidt
Enterprise Technology Architect
(425) 707-
Great news! One (more) Jedi returned from the Death Star of Bellevue.
(Now if we could just get the Wookies to stop writing code for Tivoli...)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN
this recent attachment
was the first but it certainly is (happily) infrequent here.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
that specific city of its largest
employer!
That would be worth losing a few winks pondering.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
for this specific case, use L'FILTER as the CLC length
so
it is computed as assembly time.
--
Tom Schmidt
(Did anyone in the State of Washington take offense to that?)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
without travel
requirements.
Us (old mainframers) grew up knowing how to preserve our knowledge and
pass it along. Anyone claiming the contrary is woefully uninformed.
--
Tom Schmidt
(Me a skeptic? You'll never be able to prove
David,
Could you clarify whether you perform the concatenation just once per run, or
am I understanding that you perform multiple concatenations during each run?
--
Tom Schmidt
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:13:58 -0500, David Eisenberg wrote:
The entry that was filling up was actually
Subject: SYSAFF card
If you do not use a SYSAFF card thereby taking the default of SYSAFF=ANY
will a job run only on the LPAR that it is submitted from? Can it ever
run on an LPAR other than the one submitted without a SYSAFF card?
TIA
Bill Johnson
--
Tom Schmidt
large amounts of data in operations like searching, sorting, and indexing, so
that the host application need not even access most of the data.
--
Tom Schmidt
(I apologize for the on-topic post here -- I'm sure other regular posters will
generate enough noise to bury it in practically no time
Tom Schmidt wrote:
See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
(I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the
rest of us may be happy now.)
Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than byte
represents an abberation for our standards (plus more difficulty with
external security mandates). TEP's requirement for 1.4.2 is at odds with other
IBM software that requires 1.5, but that's another matter; my desktop has to
support 2 Java vendors and that's at least one too many.
--
Tom
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:33:01 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:31:04 -0500, Arthur T. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Schmidt) wrote:
The z10 LSPR data is now available too.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/lspr/
Yes, and it looks like they are using a new femtofont
with the
physical manipulation of single atoms - to be able to fit oodles of
atomic-sized
lines onto a single sheet of paper for the 2013 version of LSPR?? We'll see.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?
infotype=ANsubtype=CAhtmlfid=897/ENUS108-154appname=USN
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
support
larger 'big page' sizes... even AIX allows for much bigger pages, doesn't it?
(ISTR 16MB)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
. AutoIPL
capability is
intended to help you achieve faster failure data capture and recovery after
system
failures.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:05:16 +1000, Shane wrote:
Nice green stripe.
Big page only 1 Meg. Interesting.
...
anything else of interest ??? ... :0)
Hmm... is it interesting that it doesn't do Windows Server (yet)?
--
Tom Schmidt
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:37:02 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Subject: Re: System z10 announcement (in English)
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:05:16 +1000, Shane wrote:
Nice green stripe.
Big page only 1 Meg. Interesting.
...
anything else
, John?
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
510T of shared storage is not enough. :-)
Yeahbut... what happened to 'Grande' in the naming scheme?
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
! I won't be able to get much sleep tonight!
Thanks!
--
Tom Schmidt
(The new phone books are here, the new phone books are here!)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
(I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the rest of us may be
happy now.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Not necessarily so -- all NDAs are not created (or maintained) equally.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
might want to ask your question again AFTER next Tuesday, Feb. 26th,
since a 'z10' has not been announced just yet. (Rumored heavily, sure, but
not announced.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
.
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
- Original Message
From: Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:42:32 PM
Subject: Re: Z10 coupling link
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:04:19 -0600, Paul Meier wrote:
Does anyone have any idea
mindset.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
-The-Shelf (software in this case; it can also apply to
hardware...
and even to people.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:20:22 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
The z9EC model number is 2097.
No, it isn't. The z9EC model number is 2094; the z9BC number is 2096.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
might be that the HE washers use very little
SOA(P). Yes,
the are environmentally friendly - very green (low water, lower power, low
detergent)
but isn't IBM Global trying to sell mostly SOAP services?)
--
Tom Schmidt
(Nope, no NDA... just speculation
says (or said)
that his
presentation would be announced prior to the session. (I read that as
confirmation that the
announcement would be sometime prior to 11am on 26Feb.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
then?)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
on SIE. I
ordered my
copy online maybe 12 years ago or so and I was told by IBM that they actually
swiped a
copy of someone's desk in POK to be able to fulfill my order. (Sorry about
that,
whomever it was! I still have the pub even though it is pretty long in the
tooth now.)
--
Tom
to come out of a wait state
when it is waiting) so it would run just as hot when it was idle as otherwise.
(Unless there is special code to account for machine perspiration?)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
) early VM/XA days it was true that VM
put itself
into a tiny loop while it waited for work. The loop was in a unique-to-VM PSW
key so that
the hardware monitor (the speedometer) could tell the difference between work
and wait.
Or am I the only person who remembers that?
--
Tom Schmidt
it to
be
late, I just want it to be born after all this time.)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
?
Oh, that makes sense -- the new PTF instruction must mean:
Play The Flute
(or Play The Fiddle?)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
...so are you going to jump from z/OS 1.4 to 1.9 ? Or 1.8?
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
.
Why not end your constant ranting and submit a requirement to IBM Marketing
or SHARE (or your favorite other user group, if any) so that you are using the
official channels and NOT wasting everyone's bandwidth on ibm-main???
Seriously!
--
Tom Schmidt
Lynn has answered that question a while ago. Check the archives. (His or
ibm-main's)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
- without Darren -
is borderline blasphemy!
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
here before.
Happy New Year
And the same to you!
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
John,
Two words: resource groups.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
is more than a single engine, so adjust your calculations accordingly.
(We have a 6-way and were off by a factor of 6 until we adjusted; then it hit
spot-on and worked nicely since then.)
Sorry to see your sysplex disappear over this... ;)
--
Tom Schmidt
referenced appear to be a fit for our
issues. (Time will tell, of course.) The APARs have been rolled back to z/OS
1.8 at least.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
into the wild
before now.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
guess people are happy writing data to storage, using FTP to ship it from
storage to storage via sockets, then reading it back into a program. ALL that
FTP I/O is unnecessary overhead.
Without BP, to paraphrase Popeye the Sailor, Well SLOW me down!
--
Tom Schmidt
of successful
small mainframe developers today on the fingers of my third hand... and I only
have two hands.
:(
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
?)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
what is (and is not) happening.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
Angel,
And did you then check for the system exits that I mentioned?
--
Tom Schmidt
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:02:00 -0500, Angel Tamayo wrote:
Thanks for your responses.
I have access to the old system in other LPAR and the displays of the
command D IKJTSO,SEND are exactly the same
buffer
coherency and integrity. It does what it says it does without hurting
transaction throughput.
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello All,
Is there anyone willing to speak of using IBM's BatchPipes with a IP socket
stage which they are (or were) using to connect LPAR-to-LPAR via
hipersockets?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN
.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
and then you ought to be good to go.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(What ever happened to Bala and Ziggy, anyway?)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
'0800'.
Check your hex arithmetic: The first address above the line should be
x'0100'.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:25:45 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:13:24 -0600, Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:54:58 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
The hightest address below the line is x'00FF'.
The first address above the line is x'0800'.
Check your hex arithmetic
?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
of the mainframe.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(Think of all the processing cycles that were sold by all competing camps
performing the code page transformations.)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
not allow for DASD-only, I suppose.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:28:24 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
The book says you can.
Doh!! Thanks, John!
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
(on an annual basis) several years ago, but all of
that may well have changed in the past decade or so. (Your manager and his
manager had to sign for you to get access (annually) then, too.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM
that, what with the Hollywood writer's strike looming.)
Alternatively, with material like yours (above) you could maybe replace Dave
Barry (since he, too, retired from his syndicate a few years ago).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
to this rant out there and to
them I apologize for my statements and wish them much luck.
Yeah, me too.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(Don't let my e-mail address fool you - I kept it for convenience; I'm a
practicing sysprog at a z9 customer site
invite security failures.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
and unleash us from the
3390 geometry tyranny. Though I'll probably sprout wings fly before I see
any more 3390 relief under z/OS, I suppose.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
for
it to respond.
(We do it with a sandbox system and it is pretty pokey when the other LPARs
are guzzling MIPS. Still, it all works but at an HO-scale. Just not the way to
run a real railroad.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
that it is safe (but not
necessarily required) to issue the STOP command to the source TSO address
space now.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(The difference between authorized or not is whether or not the + prefixes
the WTO in the display; you'll learn which right after the 1st WTO
any APF or non-APF command processor
on the system where I had no write access to their APF libraries.
That's why it was a joke.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
management problems by technical means,
the overall satisfaction rate isn't as high as most folks might expect.
Maybe it would help us help you if you could describe your problem a little
better?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
understood how TSO's command processors work and a quick
understanding of PCF's working storage it can be a matter of minutes before
you can build a working prototype to bypass PCF. (At least it was for me
about 20 years ago.) I would not recommend it on that basis.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:53:05 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Tom Schmidt wrote:
PCF was a joke as far as 'TSO security' was concerned.
As long as you understood how TSO's command processors work and a
quick understanding of PCF's working storage it can be a matter
had logged on TSO while the date was 1 year behind couldn't log on.
That was me, and a few of the programmers and the operator.
Eric,
Nobody died as a result of the operator error, right? ;)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
are looking from the perspective of a higher-level language such as C
(although I might otherwise argue that point) then you can use BPXDYN
service to switch both member name and dataset name.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:24:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:24:19 -0500, Tom Schmidt wrote:
z/OS has the venerable OPEN-J service that might be what you are looking
for
here. Check the z/OS publications for the OPEN macro's TYPE=J operand.
Those fixated on performance
this trick.
All you need to do is stop looping through the open/close once the open fails.
(You ought to provide for error recovery if the open fails anyway so that might
not be asking too much.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
within a single space is
that the default ALET value (0) in both the source and target specifications;
the primary space is just a special case that works well in their example.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN
.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
to a z/9-BC
and he posted it back in (or around) February. (Thanks, as always, Jim!)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
insurnace company (or two).
We would all like IBM to be all things to all customers... but what are the
odds
of that working out equally well for all?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(Some people would complain even if you planned on hanging them with a silk
rope
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
