(http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
will work on the
Chromebook. Legacy is not browser based so it will not work under Chrome
OS. It is unlikely that Chromebooks will ever run a virtual machine in
which Windows might operate. The answer is NO to Windows based programs.
Ron Taylor
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http
on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
criticism.
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail
).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com
/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James
* sort correctly if right to left is set - at least for Western
locations.
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com
://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com
for anyone that wants to know my history
interests
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com
://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail
/LegacyFamilyTree) and on
our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages
I only added how they related to each other, but I'm going to go back
and add the common ancestor(s) as well.
Though I have a hard time stopping myself from looking for additional
work, in this case I asked because the couple in question were only
obvious to me because I encountered the husband
Alan said he does not want to share private information due to legal
and personal reasons, but would be willing to create a stripped down
database that can recreate the problem that only contains information
he'd be willing to share. Legacy has stated twice in this thread that
would not be good
to me,
and then everyone in my file has a connection to me (as I am the hub
person, so to speak) so people in my moms line get tagged as part of
my dads line.
Somehow the 4 color coding figures this out ok. How can I do it
myself for my tags?
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http
It works! Very detailed, I appreciate that. I think the trick was to
start with the oldest in the branch, and I was stuck on grandparents.
Thanks a bunch.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Is it just me that sees humor in comments basing advancements since
roughly 1995 in a thread about GPS?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages
@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on
our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils
indicating that it is missing, it will
renew the link for them all.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.ferguson.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: James Cook
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 7:14 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Missing multimedia files
Event
DOH! The strings wrapped They, should not be. In both cases one
space between the two sections.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:59 AM, James Cook jc1...@gmail.com wrote:
It does seem that Legacy includes the information you want in the file
already - as part of the TITLE attribute of the IMG
For #2, the best I can come up with is to go to the Assigned Sources
screen for each individual. From there, you can select the source in
the list on the top half, and then in the Output tab on the bottom
half, you can copy the entire citation.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on
our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
) the conversion from Source Writer
to GEDCOM is horrible. The more I share with 3rd parties, the more I
consider dropping Source Writer and going with the Basic system.
Thanks for your input... Chick
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:06 PM, James Cook jc1...@gmail.com wrote:
For #2, the best I can
:38 PM, James Cook jc1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not stopped using Source Writer. I'm a computer guy, not a
word smith, so I do like being prompted for the correct information
and having that information formatted correctly for me - at least
within Legacy and in reports produced by Legacy
Only one way to manage this (IMO):
- Do all work in Legacy.
- Replace online trees via Legacy upload periodically. (At ancestry
it's a delete, new upload)
If you must go from online to Legacy, then possibley...
- Find a GEDCOM diff tool (gotta be one of those right?)
- Download GEDCOM from your
://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com
I use Census events in marriage area for couples to limit the info I
need to past around. I like to look at the chronology and/or reports
and be able to tell if I've found them on all available census during
there lifetime. If you do not use a Census event, is it not an
important part of your
I source notes, but because they apply to the entire notes I use an
MLA notation on paragraphs to indicate which sources goes with what.
So a note I got from a book on Smiths might have a notation like
[Smith95]. Maybe a census would be [C1880]. I am not too formal with
my notations, just enough
/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old
Re: Where to put address, cemetery name, church name, etc.
I put them both in the Location and in the Address forms (behind the +
buttons as previous mentioned).
Why? That's the real question, right?
In the Location fields because of the flexibility it provides for
searches, reports, mapping
[[Father of John]]
Smith
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jane Sarles sarlesinsi...@gmail.com wrote:
When I have an ancestor, whose given name I do not know, but for whom I have
information to create and event, I should like to know what other people
use for a given name.
Legacy User Group
I use double brackets [[Father of John]] - these are called privacy
brackets (I think) in the help file. This gives you flexibility in
that you have options in reports settings to either include or exclude
private data, and I am pretty sure remove the brackets as well. I
usually do not include
Didn't see any replies, but I think LTools has a lineage worksheet
that will print between any two people - male or female. Dennis said
he's out for a month, but maybe somebody could confirm if this true.
Or go find Dennis in the other mail group.
Having said that, that will not answer the
Ah, you are right, that's what I was thinking of. Frustrating for sure!
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Gene Young n2...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
I believe you are
referring to the selection to expand/contract location names. This
apparently only acts on existing entries that Legacy has already
I was afraid that was going to be the answer.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Alan Pereira alanpere...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Just tried the Potential problems and all works fine for me.
Version 7.5.0.166 Windows 7 64 bit
Alan Pereira
-Original Message-
From: James Cook [mailto:jc1
That was my thought initially, but after a follow-up from the OPer, it
seems that when entering new locations (and I guess when geolocating),
Legacy now returns United States ALWAYS. So, if you are one who
prefers USA, you must manually change it every time. Not friendly at
all.
On Mon, Mar
Still doing it today, after Check Repair (3 images have been
renamed) and a reboot. I did do a backup before updating Legacy, but
when after the update it told me my file was not in the correct format
and had to be updated too. It warned me that doing so would make it
incompatible with prior
Just as a test, I opened the Sample.fdb file, and the Potential
Problems locks up on that one too.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:34 PM, James Cook jc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Still doing it today, after Check Repair (3 images have been
renamed) and a reboot. I did do a backup before updating Legacy
Further Experimentation...
If I click either the Create Problems List or the View Existing
Problems List the dang things locks up every time. However, if I
click the Preview button, I get a report back.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived
Thanks for checking. I've rebooted several times, turned off McAfee,
downloaded the update vs install from web. Nothing fixed it for me.
Have sent an emal to support.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
You could work out of the Dropbox folder, but I don't - no particular
reason. I just copy the files to dropbox occasionally. I wrote a
little script to automate the process.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Many, including myself, put this type of information in location
fields. The benefits of using location are:
- Work in the most amount of reports (or at least it seems so to me,
haven't actually done a complete study of where notes show up)
- Can geocode and map specific locations in the same
Your welcome. Glad to have helped.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Thank you James, yes it has helped a lot. Your para. 1) is also my
understanding.
2) is new to me, as I never used Ancestry in that way, and simply upload a
basic GEDCOM from
).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup
://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
--
James Cook
GED Utils, Ancestry Utils
http://loosestacks.blogspot.com/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http
Is the Master Source also copied, or is it a shared in the database? If
shared, you could use to produce the desired results.
The question then becomes why would one NOT want to go this route? IIRC,
the examples and videos make use of very generic master sources (Missouri
Birth Certs,
I have a marriage document (both the license and certificate all-in-one).
As a newbie, I've spent a few hours trying to figure out the best way to
enter the information. I went searching through the archives to see if I
could find various recipes you all use with maybe the pros and cons. I'm
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote:
James Cook wrote
I have a marriage document (both the license and certificate
all-in-one). ...
I haven't come across such a document before, so I can't speak from
actual experience, but I think I might source
What is intended to go in the description? Entering World War II or PFC
US Marine Corps doesn't look right in the generated sentence to me. For
the default template: [HeShe] served in the military [Desc]... I've entered
, US Marine Corps, in the Description filed so that it reads something
like
Of course. *BUT* Because the intended use is not apparent to me, I want to
get a better understanding before going and and making such changes. I
don't feel I have enough information and/or experience with Legacy to make
the determination as to when and if I should right now, and am looking for
I've pulled an image off of Ancestry.com. The image is noticeably
scanned from a bound book. In the case of something like public
records on ancestry, I've been using Ancestry as the source (as all I
get in that case is Ancestry's transcription of the original). In
this case though, I can see
-- Original Message --
From: James Cook jc1...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Advice on Sourcing of marriage record
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:47:04 -0600
I've pulled an image off of Ancestry.com. The image is noticeably
scanned from a bound book
I do agree with your assertions about the actual source and incidental
collections it can be found in. As such, I think you are suggesting
State Archives be listed as the primary source but include a snippet
about found at Ancestry. This is what I was trying before asking my
question, but wasn't
Bummer on the URLs. I have not considered this, but do see the risks
as you've said. The whole URL makes the citations really ugly though.
I'll have to think on this and see if I can address the issue but
keep cleaner (IMHO) citations.
Thanks
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Jim Walton
Right. I understand that, and it works very well.
Kristen has suggested an alternate template (online images), which
doesn't seem to include a ready made for adding the 'citing State
Archives...' Also, that template seems to me to prompt for input from
the original source (State Archives)
Ah, end results are very similar. Will have to play with both ideas
and see which one I like better.
Thanks add
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Kirsten Bowman vik...@rvi.net wrote:
James:
Under the example I sent earlier, the phrase citing State Archives could be
added on the Text/Comments
I'm going with the assumption it's just me, but I still have a few
questions about data entry in Legacy I hope to get a better
understanding on. It just doesn't make sense to me how some things
seem to be working. (FWIW, I'm using 7.4)
First, I've added photos to the birth, burial, and marriage
and drop within the same file. If this can be
done, please tell me how.
Thanks,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Lionel Carter
lionelcar...@freezone.co.uk wrote:
James Cook wrote:
Is there any way to copy and paste an event?
I think so. I regard a census as an event. This means
Holy Crap! It was right in front of me all along. I don't know how
many times I manually did this over the weekend. Anyway, thanks, I
just knew there had to be a way to do this.
So, how about getting the images from the super-events to show in my
reports? Or, if not that, how to add an extra
How very annoying! OK then, I will play with that this evening if I
get a chance. Do you have any tips on sentence structure for such
events?
jc
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:01 PM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:
This has been a problem for a long time and must be too difficult or
unimportant
Who in the world today is forced to download images, attachments, or
HTML? This can be controlled on the user's end, and anybody being
charged by the byte surely has taken care of this already.
Unfortunately, I don't think there is a way for these same users to
stop the bytes of worthless *text*
You can not control WHAT is downloaded.
I do everyday. All the stripping and filtering is done server side,
so no bandwidth to me.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
I can get the list of people I want by doing a Search - Find -
Detail Search and creating a list where the Burial place contains
Oklahoma. I need to print this list and include the cemetery name and
address. I do not see the option to select these details on the print
options.
How can I get the
As a newbie, I've not played with the surety, but this thread got me
interested enough to check it out, and see how it could be used to do what
is desired here. With a range of 0-4 only, it seems too limited to be made
to fit. Having the ability to use your own numbers system could be better.
I've decided I agree with you and Ron (not a surprise really) - Yes,
this is a very good example of why it's a good thing to do.
The other options listed in this thread only work today, manual work
is needed again tomorrow as new data has been added to the database.
Adopting this style of data
Going through the archives, I ran across a post about problems with
the 3-bar paste. I did not realize until I read through that, that
this button pastes to ALL EVENTS currently attached to the
individual!Now, I know I have sources attached to events
that do not belong. Please tell
I've been struggling through this same issue lately, and the level of
detail in this thread is very nice. Thank you all! I'm new, so take
this for what it is, but I've a few thoughts to add.
1) I disagree that this location boils down to simply personal
preference. At least the way I look at
I've struggled with this in the last couple of weeks too. Like you, I
was bitten by this failure of the software, and came to the archives
when I discovered I could not get my data back out once entered in as
I was prompted to by the program. I think Why? is the question of
the day.
But, to
Yes it is terrible and a lot of cleanup. There are way to many of
little gotchas like this that I cannot believe the software gets a
5-star rating on review sites. Sure it's a nice app, I can almost go
along with the best available (I've not tried them all), but I can
only give it a 5-stat once
I'm confused now. We've been talking about using the Location field
to hold detailed place information because the Address under the +
button on vital events doesn't work, or is at least so limiting that
it in practice, well, doesn't work. The purpose is that using the
Location can be counted on
.
CE
-Original Message-
From: James Cook [mailto:jc1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:12 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Help, how to cleanup the mess the 3-bar paste button
has made
Yes it is terrible and a lot of cleanup
to explore Event Addresses for creating the
report you mentioned. You can use it in addition to the Location.
CE
-Original Message-
From: James Cook [mailto:jc1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:38 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Locations
I wasn't arguing for changing it necessarily, but at least a warning
that 'Hey, are you sure this applies to the 15 events attached to John
Doe? would be nice. I've read the help, and there are times when I
wasn't ready to grasp what was written there until a later time. I'm
sure the first dozen
I started this 3-bar mess today, and all I've suggested is a warning
to the effect that Hey, are you sure this event applies all 15
pre-existing events. I don't think that is asking too much.
Other things I've been bitten by - adding photos to vital events,
adding address to vital events, adding
+1 to what Ron said.
I'll continue to use this button, as it is helpful, especially when
adding a new person to the database. But, you can bet that I'll skip
it, or at least use it with extreme care, should I be tempted to use
it again on somebody with existing events.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at
I'm talking about the tidbits of information handed down in legends,
sent in emails, or flow out of interviews? Things like Grandpa Moses
lived in a river boat on the river, or Great Aunt Sally dated Jesse
James, or whatever. The stuff that puts some life into all the facts
we collect. I've
Thanks all, good stuff so far.
Richard - Why no source, every story would have at least a personal
reference, even if that is you, right?
Dawn - I have not heard of TheJournal, but will check it out.
Rita - Yes, Note is obvious, but some cons is that all notes are
contained there with a big
around to splitters (custom events) vs
lumpers (Individual Notes) again.
Cheers,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
James Cook wrote
Jenny - I don't understand because one might have numerous notes, each
with a different Source, I indicate briefly
Thanks all.
After reading this, I think a mix of solutions will be required. I
can see how a custom event works well for smallish bits (paragraph or
two) of information, and how a separate write-up for larger (page or
two) stories may be necessary. For those larger write-ups done in a
word
+1
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jennifer Crockett
jcrock...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
In defence of Bob, I experienced the exactly the same sort of problems when I
tried to subscribe a couple of months ago. Eventually after doing nothing but
tearing my hair out, some sort of glitch
I'm fine with that, but not what I was asking. I can tell I'm not
being clear. I'll try again.
If I do a 3-page write up of my grandfathers WWII campaigns in Saipan,
I'm thinking it would be nice to slip this into something like a
Descendant Narrative right after or before his details. I don't
Yes I am leaning this way too. To me, in person, via email, via
Facebook, via IM, via handwritten letter and similar modes of
communication all boil down to a Personal Knowledge kind of source.
Most of this stuff I do not see the need nor do I have the desire to
maintain 100% of it in its
Well there's some ideas to explore, but doesn't sound as if anyone has
actually integrated Legacy reports with work processor documents.
Another 'suck it and see' I suppose.
Thanks all
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov.
Thanks, I will. I'm an OOO guy myself.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
James Cook wrote:
Well there's some ideas to explore, but doesn't sound as if anyone has
actually integrated Legacy reports with work processor documents.
Another 'suck
I like this idea, and plan to try it.
As with any conversation is evolves and takes different thought paths
through out. It does make it hard to follow sometimes, especially in
email form. I do think we have just about wrapped this one up though,
so I'll summarize what I think has been said.
It seems that the problems with being able to get back out the
information you enter into Legacy with regard to Addresses vs Location
is not limited to the report generators. After looking through the
archives, I gave the 3rd party tool GedView a test. I found that the
mapping inside Legacy and
reversal this time. Sometimes it seems the left
hand is unaware there's a right hand at Legacy headquarters.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
James Cook wrote:
It seems that the problems with being able to get back out the
information you enter
Sounds to me there are two different things being talked about here.
1) A custom General ToDo category. This could be attached to an
individual however. Then there are the todo's that have been added
via the Tools menu (I think) that are not attached to any individual.
Given that, if one were
I entered a problem ticket, and received some more info. on this...
Exporting using the Legacy format option does include MAP, LATI, and
LONG for places. So, my statement that getting the data back out is
wrong, and I stand corrected.
However, the way they come back out is via some sort of
Lisa, fair warning, it's a lot like the BORG around here - Resistance
Is Futile. You Will Be Assimilated!
I, like you, do not like that the only option we are given for Source
Details is to paste separate copies all around to every
individual/event. I did not grasp this point at first, and it
changed all and only
wanted to change the one, it easier to change it back (magic everyone
is fixed) and then make the one copy in the one spot I need it (all
done). Much less risk.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
James Cook wrote
Maybe an example
Go here:
http://www.familytreemaker.com/Support/PatchDetails.aspx
Look for Link To Existing Source-Citation
Best I can do.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:31:05 -0500, James Cook jc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there other genie
Legacy is somehow associating an individual with a Source Detail via
Id's in some table someplace, right?
The only difference I really see is that Legacy forces a copy of
Source Detail, so that each association has a brand new ID that ties
them together. If you read that info. I pointed to, FTM
Hmm... Seems a bit odd to me, but if that's how it is, you are right,
it would take a new table to make this happen. Would be worth while
IMO still.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:48:32 -0500, James Cook jc1...@gmail.com
After reading over the tagging feature in Legacy, it seems that is
intent is to help assemble groups of people for generating lists
and/or reports. It does mention that the tags could be named if you
wish, but no examples of why one might want to do so. I wondering in
what ways others have found
If all you want to do is see an individual and all associated events
on one screen, then perhaps bringing up the source citation window
will be of help. I believe the intent of the screen is for you to
determine what has and has not been sourced, but you get to see all
events and vitals for an
The 'Save the Current Book...' option is not working for me. What is
necessary to fix this? The save dialog comes up, asks me to save in
the Legacy - Books folder and saves a 1KB file. No matter what I do,
it's always a 1KB file, and if I choose the 'Load a Saved Book', no
matter which saved
I renamed the 'Books' folder as the first step. Made and saved some
reports. I can retrieve them ok now. I did nothing with the user
files. Thanks for the tips on this.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
In some cases, I have the same image attached to multiple individuals
and/or marriages. When I included a scrapbook in a book I'm creating
via the Publishing Center, this causes the same image to be included
multiple times. I do not want this behavior, besides the fact
duplicates make no sense
It's not only the same file name, it's the same file from the same location.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:42 PM, David C Abernathy
da...@schmeckabernathy.com wrote:
James,
Are there different files names for each of the different attached files?
Or are they ALL using the same file name?
Thanks,
Ok, thanks for the update. I found the rtf options, right there in
front of my face! Doh!
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Sherry/Support
she...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote:
At this time, if a picture is linked to a Familiy File to more than\
one individual, event, etc, it will show up in the
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
