Very weird because mail.local which is used for mbox delivery adds the line unconditionally.How did you update ?Le 8 août 2019 00:30, Michael Warmuth-Uhl a écrit :Hello,
since my yesterday's update to OpenBSD 6.5 (from 6.3 via 6.4),
smtpd does create invalid mbox entries for one of my mailboxe
are as follow:
smtp limit max-mails = max number of mails per session
smtp limit max-rcpt = max number of recipient per transaction
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org patreon: https://www.patreon.com/gilles
m
>
>
> AFAICS the syntax follows the man page, so why does it complain?
> I don't see it. Every helpful hint is highly appreciated.
>
you're using an auth label but this requires a secure transport.
from smtpd.conf(5):
The label corresponds to an entry in a cred
You have to send a mail to misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org from the e-mail address you want to unsubscribe.You can't unsubscribe other addresses.If you need help, contact me off listLe 6 août 2019 11:30, Harald Dunkel a écrit :Hi folks,
https://www.opensmtpd.org/list.html doesn't tell how to uns
have updated our website front page to provide the tarball and signature
as direct links.
Alternatively, you can grab the release from our github mirror under the
tag opensmtpd-6.4.2p1:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/tree/opensmtpd-6.4.2p1
--
Gilles Chehade
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 08:37:54PM +, L??vai, D??niel wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> Did you by any chance have time to look at #926? It there something wrong
> with my setup or is this a kind of a regression?
> Thanks for any info on this!
>
Nope, if I had you would know ;-)
craft logs to ease creation of dashboards,
I suck at actaully creating these dashboards.
If there are a few people around with ELK knowledge, it would be nice to
give me some help in showcasing what can be achieved with this feature.
--
Gilles Ch
other intrusive/ugly
> workaround, is there any way I could force a CA for those connections?
>
Your expectations are also mine.
Please open an issue on our bug tracker, I'll have a look at it shortly
as I recently did work in that area a
ng unusual !
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.orgpatreon: https://www.patreon.com/gilles
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On 7/23/19 11:58 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Hello people,
> >
> > The portable branch of OpenSMTPD should build with OpenSSL again as long
> > as your system is using >= 1.1.x
th LibreSSL and OpenSSL with same code as far as I know. I will get
into this when time allows but until then ECDSA server certificate is
only supported with LibreSSL.
OpenSMTPD portable has been built and tested with Ubuntu only, please do
provide fe
out 1- and 2-, because it means we
are now VERY VERY VERY sysadmin friendly when it comes to monitoring and
alerting: pushing useful metrics to elasticsearch has become trivial. It
is likely I'll release a filter-elastic if there is interest.
St
ho were still trying to avoid LibreSSL through local patches,
but once we've switched to libtls, work can start to create a version
of libtls that works with OpenSSL, this will keep most complexity out
of OpenSMTPD and make us work again with OpenSSL without hacks.
Ch
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 04:57:51PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> helo,
>
> this is just a question out of curiosity
>
> I know plenty of people use the lmtp action to deliver mail through LMTP
> and I'm genuinely curious: what is your use-case ?
>
> Why do you del
helo,
this is just a question out of curiosity
I know plenty of people use the lmtp action to deliver mail through LMTP
and I'm genuinely curious: what is your use-case ?
Why do you deliver to LMTP ?
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
opportunistic tls, so it'll do tls no-verify
but will fallback to plaintext if no tls is available.
tls no-verify won't hard fail if certificate is invalid, but it won't go
to plaintext either.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
authenticated user to be a "local" user, so if you
read my blog post with that perspective, it makes sense.
Nowadays, authenticated users and local users are considered differently
so you need to match 'auth' to catch authenticated users.
> Thank you for any suggestions you m
t;
> smtp-out: Server certificate verification failed on session 3ba547f4f7b77d56c
>
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
nothing
no-verify only means that if certificate does not validate, connection
will be dropped, the log will still be visible.
--
Gilles Chehade
x27;t find anything on opensmtpd.org. Or
> should I just check the source code of already existing filters as example?
>
the filter API is not yet documented, i'm working on it at the moment.
if you plan on working on filters, you should join our IRC channel or be
prepared to fac
D will not advertise AUTH over plaintext channels.
it is not an SMTP limitation, it is a decision we made years ago and you
will not have a work-around for this.
there's no excuse in 2019 to allow AUTH over plaintext :-)
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 06:54:02AM +, mabi wrote:
> ? Original Message ?
> On Sunday, June 30, 2019 1:46 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > I'm currently working on bringing a filter-rspamd to life, see:
> >
> > https:/
nice but I don't understand how it works.I'm looking
> forward to have something native with opensmtpd, spam is a pain.
>
I don't understand what you mean by "native".
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org
rds seems to work flawlessly, except for
> unexplained Proofpoint blocks.
>
These happen even to the best of us.
> Hope you all are having a wonderful day.
>
Enjoy your stay around,
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:54:36AM +0200, Pierre-Edouard wrote:
>
> Le 26/05/2019 ?? 17:22, Gilles Chehade a ??crit??:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:53:46AM +0200, Pierre-Edouard wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > > I a
re still able to send me
> mail :(
>
> Any ideas ?
>
the 'from rdns' criteria will fail to match if the client doesn't have a
reverse dns, so a way to catch them would be:
match !from rdns regex '^.*$' [...]
i'll have a look at how to
Recipient ok
RCPT TO:
250 2.1.5 Destination address valid: Recipient ok
RCPT TO:
250 2.1.5 Destination address valid: Recipient ok
RCPT TO:
250 2.1.5 Destination address valid: Recipient ok
RCPT TO:
250 2.1.5 Destination address valid: Recipient ok
^C
I think your issues isn't with Ope
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 04:52:39PM +0200, David Flatz wrote:
> Gilles Chehade (2019-05-19 14:31+0200):
> > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 12:16:40PM +0200, David Flatz wrote:
> > > Gilles Chehade (2019-05-19 10:39+0200):
> > > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:24:07AM +0200, Gill
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 12:16:40PM +0200, David Flatz wrote:
> Gilles Chehade (2019-05-19 10:39+0200):
> > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:24:07AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 02:55:05PM +0200, David Flatz wrote:
> > > > Delivery to doveco
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:24:07AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 02:55:05PM +0200, David Flatz wrote:
> > Hello everybody
> >
>
> Hello,
>
>
> > Delivery to dovecot works pretty good for normal mails locally with sendmail
> > an
to dovecot) or add a domain?
>
> Thanks again and have a great weekend!
>
Yup, the fix will be committed to -current today
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You re
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 02:13:46PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
Hi,
> I understand that ssl support is a highly complex issue, making it
> necessary to focus and to get rid of the cruft.
>
> It would be a pity if opensmtpd becomes "OpenBSD-only", thoug
.
If you have diffs that allow OpenSMTPD to build with latest LibreSSL and
latest stock OpenSSL (no weird enable/disable configure flags) and which
only achieve so through use of common APIs, I'll accept them happily.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpO
ing EMails.
>
without your configuration it's hard to determine what's wrong
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
> > ab
> > [1] - https://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-6.5/smtpd.conf
> > [2] - https://man.openbsd.org/smtpd.conf
> > [3] - https://www.openbsd.org/65.html
> > -|-|-|-|-|-|-|--
> >
>
>
IP address for mail with correct rDNS and fc-rDNS
- setup the mta to support TLS (if needed, not the case on OpenSMTPD)
- setup the mta to use a EHLO name matching DNS for the IP
- setup SPF
- setup DKIM
That would be my very very very very minimum requirements.
--
Gilles Chehade
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>
> > On 6 Feb 2019, at 17:24, Mischa wrote:
> >
> >> On 6 Feb 2019, at 15:38, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:42:19AM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >>> Hi
th from any mail-from "@opensmtpd.org" reject
there are other ways too
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:35:56PM +0100, Tor Houghton wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:40:20PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > You should really avoid using mlmmj from the config or aliases file.
> >
> > You can easily plug mlmmj from .forward files which is
in action "mlmmj"
> >
> >
>
You should really avoid using mlmmj from the config or aliases file.
You can easily plug mlmmj from .forward files which is much safer.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:23:23PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > On 29 Jan 2019, at 16:20, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:10:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >> Hi Gilles,
> >>
> >>> well, providing the full session log from conne
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:10:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> > well, providing the full session log from connect to disconnect without
> > altering it would be a good start to troubleshoot.
>
> Yeah... not really going to happen on public mailinglist. :/
>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:41:17PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>
> > On 29 Jan 2019, at 12:30, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:08:41PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
>
ost=46-23-xx-yy.domain1.nl
> Jan 18 15:56:13 mx1 smtpd[36743]: 00a1b263550db3c7 smtp failed-command
> command="RCPT TO:" result="550 Invalid recipient"
> Jan 18 15:56:13 mx1 smtpd[36743]: 00a1b263550db3c7 smtp disconnected
> reason=disconnect
>
>
#x27;t really help to figure it out though.
>
yes :-/
the problem is that the SMTP engine expects an SMTP session, and instead
it receives a blob which violates the protocol and likely contains a new
line that triggers pipeline violation mechan
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 01:11:44AM +0100, Eric Elena wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:08:02 +0100 Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > I may sound a bit harsh, but starting a thread with "this is my last try
> > or I'll switch" (as if it actually matters) right before telling som
t want to be "that asshole", although it seems I've succeeded again -
> sorry.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to reply. Now I'm going to go check that mail
> server a 7,000,000th time, this time to see what MTA is actually *running*,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 02:56:10PM +0300, Tevfik Ceydeliler wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there anu way to add diclaimer?? into?? mail by using smtpd?
>
Not yet possible easily, no
Will be doable with the next release
--
Gilles Chehade @poo
you actually tried _nothing_ then blaming the
code improvements for a use-case that could have never worked because it
not only uses the wrong _documented_ mechanism but also because the code
to make your use-case work has never existed, kinds of irritates me.
I don't get royalties on s
cope, it can only expand it.
What you are describing has never existed in smtpd, there's never been
code to translate sender addresses and there's a good reason for that:
it not considered doable before the grammar change...
But sure, blame it on the grammar.
> (If anyone cares, the bad
t;relay_incoming" relay host smtp://127.0.0.1:10025
>
> match for local action "lmtp-local"
> match tag DKIM_CHECKED from any for domain action "lmtp-local"
> match tag DKIM for any action "relay"
> match from any for domain action &qu
sion established a connection then attempted TLS
negotiation. this worked fine, the MTA session played out until it hit a
TLS error that caused it to drop connection. TLS was opportunistic so it
connected again but without TLS.
The only "issue" in this log is that th
dy@public.domain -> andy@imap3.private
>
this will appear in Received lines though
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Doable with OpenSMTPD using multiple actions and using the rcpt-to matching
criteria, however it feels kind of hackish to do it at that level.
Basically you would create one action per dovecot shard, then one match per
shard with an rcpt-to criteria pointing to a table containing the recipients
charge of handling delivery for all virtual users.
This option is not usable with the mbox delivery method.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You recei
uoting the man page:
[!] from src address |
Specify that session may only originate from string or
list table address which can be a specific address or a
subnet expressed in CIDR-notation.
you're using an older versi
nSMTPD builtin.
it was fixed three days ago in -current.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
T
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 01:30:09PM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Bonjour Monsieur Gilles,
>
> > To reject a session based only on reporting events, you should subscribe
> > to the relevant events in order to gather the info you want, then to one
> > filter event to actual
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:06:02PM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Bonjour Monsieur Gilles,
>
> Merci beaucoup for your exhaustive explanations.
>
> > > 1) What is the difference between the "report" and "filter" prefixes?
> > > My current
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 07:23:50PM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Bonjour Monsieur Gilles,
>
> To start with, Merci Beaucoup for all the effort and patience.
>
> I think there might an inadvertent interchanging of the comments
> in your blog post titled "more o
omain regex [...]
etc...
You can read more about it from my blog where I wrote an article talking
about filters two days ago and a smaller article today about regex.
Code has been synchronized in github already.
--
Gilles Chehade
initated the connection:
$ spamdb | grep -E '^(GREY|WHITE)\|' | cut -d\| -f1,2
Do not spam misc@ with that output, send it directly to me.
Thanks !
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https:/
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Monsieur Gilles,
>
[...]
> > This will result in smtpd replacing the welcome banner with the message,
> > then dropping the client connection if they don't have a reverse DNS and
> > a matching forward
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:13:11AM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
Hi,
> Thank you for your elaborate response.
>
> > if someone steps up to do the work, I will happily welcome the FAQ again
> > but it needs to be someone who commits to that work, not someo
you're running stable you will always be up to date with patches.
> > On 20 Dec 2018, at 6:38 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 02:52:19PM +1100, Antonino Sidoti wrote:
> >> HI,
> >>
> >> I am on OpenBSD 6.4 and
t; On 17 Dec 2018, at 3:15 am, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:11:23AM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> >> Hi Gilles,
> >>
> >> Stupid question but did these minor fixes come via a syspatch or do I need
> >> to download and
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:05:52AM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 06:39:59PM +, mabi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was wondering where did the FAQ section on the opensmtpd.org website
> > > disappear
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:11:23AM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> Stupid question but did these minor fixes come via a syspatch or do I need
> to download and compile the tarball?
>
If you're on OpenBSD 6.4 and run syspatch, you will be fine.
> On Sun,
rectly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@o
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:56:35PM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Gilles,
>
> I've got some time on my hands for the next few weeks. I could work on it
> if you'd like.
>
Again it's not a matter of working on it but commiting to maintain it on
the long run.
The
a rework of the FAQ as far as I know.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail t
then
forgotten, otherwise this means additional work for me.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubsc
m infected home computers, which is most
of the non legitimate trafic coming to my box.
The code will be part of next release in April, until then you will have
to use code from OpenBSD -current or github's master or portable branch.
Thought I'd share this with you,
Che
that will actually have their filters
evolve as we make changes to the API.
I wrote a python binding in less than 100 lines of code and will provide
it for testing, maybe some of you want to write the same kind of binding
for other popular languages, let me know.
--
Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:10:15AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> adding misc@opensmtpd.org...
>
diff ok with me !
> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 04:05:49 +
> From: su...@nimmagadda.net
> To: Gilles Chehade
> Cc: Cristiano Costa , misc@opensmtpd.org
> Subject:
avelled to the party capital. So you wait/spool
> > in London until Edinburgh airport is receiving traffic. Then then you
> > get the next flight to your final destination & Hogmanay for 3 days.
>
> Thank you for the excellent analogy.
>
> I will now never forge
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:53:20AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> [...]
> > > ascii_load_bounce_type(enum bounce_type *dest, char *buf)
> > > {
> > > if (strcasecmp(buf, "error") == 0)
> > > -
?
>
That's not possible.
If you have only 1 public IP address, how is the server supposed to know
which domain it should print on the banner when a client connects ?
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org t
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:10:13PM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:22:14AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> > > Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:11:29PM -0200, Cristian
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:22:14AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:11:29PM -0200, Cristiano Costa wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Recently, we have updated our external MTA to u
; >Thus, 'Action: error' in this DSN is non-compliant. It should be
> > 'Action: failed'. You may wish to report this to the opensmtpd developers."
>
> So maybe you would like to patch opensmtpd too.
>
option:
> -negation TAG tables {
> +negation TAGGED tables {
> struct table *t = $3;
>
> if (rule->flag_tag) {
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscr
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Stefan Bagdohn wrote:
> Dear Gilles,
>
> You are a genius! I have no idea why this did not work out in the last weeks
> when I tried to get it up and running.
> Now I ended up with:
>
A genius, that's unlikely, but glad that i
..@example.com. So it was relayed afterwards by the first rule.
>
> Any hint how this could be done in the new grammar? I have no idea how to
> implement the old-style => catchall.
>
grammar set aside, it's done the exact same way.
--
Gilles Chehade
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 01:05:56PM +0100, Fran??ois wrote:
> Thanks Gilles for your quick answer.
>
> Based on your recommendations, I have now only this 3 match rules :
>
> match from any mail-from for any reject
> match auth from local action relayer
> match auth from
e authenticated users which come
from your machine or from others:
match auth from local [...]
match auth from any [...]
Your new ruleset should have one or two additional match rules I guess.
Also, while at it, it is now also possible to match non-network sessions
wi
d.in/yGqkv7
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
>
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org t
at direction but reloading not being very
important in my mind it might take time, if someone wanted to work on it
i'd help with getting started though ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/po
ept [...] deliver to mbox
action bleh mbox
match [...] action bleh
You write your rules the same way, they are evaluated in the same order,
there are a few minor keyword changes but quite frankly I don't see what
is so complex.
Anyways, the change was mandatory to move forward so th
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 09:11:22AM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2018 8:24 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > There seems to be something wrong with your mail encoding, the diff is
> > barely readable for me, spaces are replaced with '?' :-/
&
nsion of an alias.
before 6.4, this resulted in "Recipient rejected" with no indication the
reason was in the expansion, so now the recipient is rejected but we let
the postmaster know this had to do with an expansion problem.
--
Gilles Chehade
.
>
> Not sure if there's a better way to accomplish this though.
>
that's the correct way of handling it in my opinion
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
Yo
s already quite long, it means that you have more
trust in the reliability of your secondary MX than your primary MX and
this essentially means your setup is wrong.
if you still want to do that, you should consider also looking at the
bounce warn-interval option so at the very least y
; +?? ?? "sendfd proc exec id inet unix", NULL) == -1)
> ?? err(1, "pledge");
>
> event_dispatch();
>
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc
ck in grammar then
passing it to the mda when when the Junk case is very isolated and can
be covered with a couple strcasecmp() calls.
If X-Spam-Flag had been part of the junk test in mail.maildir.c, would
this diff still had been written ? to cover which case ?
Gilles
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:02:
ou used something like:
$ openssl s_client -host 50.55.65.87 -port 587
instead of:
$ openssl s_client -host 50.55.65.87 -port 587 -starttls smtp
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/po
rs that are not production critical and which have
backup MX in case they're down, we encourage you to run master branch on
OpenBSD and portable branch on other systems, to run bleeding edge code.
This is what runs on the OpenSMTPD mailing list machine, so they are not
too unstable :-)
Cheers,
ping me
so we can talk.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: mis
ar.gz
https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-extras-6.4.0.sum.sig
Cheers,
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
tarball and signature file:
https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-6.4.0p2.tar.gz
https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-6.4.0p2.sum.sig
The website will catch up on download links soon.
Enjoy !
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 06:35:45AM -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:01:08 +0100, Gilles Chehade
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 04:01:12PM -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My conf is basically
> >
201 - 300 of 1306 matches
Mail list logo
