Re: abort_nosubject=ask-no not working as expected

2001-12-17 Thread Marc Wilson

On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 10:29:55PM -0500, John P . Verel wrote:
 Does the abort_nosubject option work in 1.2.5?

Yes.

 My .muttrc entry is:
 
 set abort_nosubject=ask-no

That says always ask me what I want, make the default answer be 'no'.
It's a quadoption.

-- 
Marc Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




msg21655/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: utf-8 display problem index vs. pager

2001-12-17 Thread Stephan Seitz

Hi!

On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 04:00:03PM +0100, Cristian wrote
 browsers: w3m-m17n (with autoconversion from `any' other character set),
   lynx (works with UTF-8 and iso-8859-1, at least)

Strange, never w3m nor lynx can correctly display
http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/manga.html. But w3mmee does.

 editors:  emacs-20.7 (oc-patched) (only as X app, not with -nw), mined,
   nano (partially), pico (but not 'pine -F' -- weird!)

vim since 6.0.

 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS had a Mutt-UTF-8 patch for earlier Mutt 1.3.x at
 http://www.rano.org/mutt.html
 which now seems to be obsolete, though some people may still need his
 patched slang-1.4.4 (I use ncurses 5.2, so I don't need slang).

Do you have ncurses compiled with wide-char-support, and mutt is link
againts libncursesw.so.5.2?
The standard ncurses never really worked for me, but now Debian has
the slang-utf8 package in testing, so it works fine with mutt.

 OK folks, time to switch to UTF-8!

Hm, two problems exist until now:
German gpg messages aren't display correctly, so are html mails
(displayed with lynx, usr/bin/lynx -force_html -dump '%s').
w3mmee works (w3mmee %s), but links within the mail are lost.
Any hints?

Shade and sweet water!

Stephan

-- 
| Stephan Seitz   E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  WWW: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/|
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/pgp.html |



msg21656/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Quoting when replying

2001-12-17 Thread Thorsten Haude

Hi,

* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 20:12]:
We had an exchange on this one before, but the more I see it, the less
I like it.

It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
Linux had hit the scene (ca 1991, IIRC) and when the web was still a gleam
in Tim's eye (ca 1991, as I was corrected the last time I provided this
sort of response).  In the heat of many passionate arguments going back
and forth, with quoting sometimes ten levels deep, it was easy to lose
track of who said what when.  To set my comments apart from others'
I started using %_ (the common notation for a trailing space, just
like the From_ header).  I had, IIRC, already seen a few folks using |
and within a few years all manner of quoting (most commonly : :_ | |_ $
but occasionally % and %_ just like me) abounded.
As others have said, you cannot set your comments apart by using a
different quote sign.
As others have noticed, uniqueness is a Bad Thing in today's email
environment.
I can't really say what went on in Usenet when we were young, but I
can definitely say that your quote sign makes your mails harder to
read. Since you know this, you must should have a very good reason to
use it anyway. Please tell us.

I've simply kept it since then, and it's relatively unique and still
recognizable.
When I was young, I spent a lot of time in Fido. I prepended the quote
sign with the initials, just like discussed before.
This was only possible because I and 80% of everyone else used
Crosspoint, which not only knew how to display this thing, but could
also reliably reflow quotes, keeping everything neat even at the 10th
quoting level. (It was also made easier by compulsory clear names.)
This was very useful, since you could see with one look who wrote the
quote (not who quoted it). It was color-coded of course. Nobody had
any problems, because everyone either used Crosspoint or started using
it very soon, so it was accepted standard.

I don't use initials anymore, because most MUAs/editors would break.
You keep your bad habit even though you are fully aware that your
quoting style does the same. This without giving any reason but
personal tradition.

Your mails are as ineffective as outlooked mails with the answer
following the questions.

Hey, at least mine is easy to match with $quote_regexp!
I don't change my mutt.rc for individuals who are not me.

Thorsten
-- 
If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
- Sir Isaac Newton



fcc-save-hook

2001-12-17 Thread Munish Chopra

Hi,

I couldn't find too much helpful stuff through google or the archives,
so here goes...

I'm trying to construct a fcc-save-hook thingamajig that will save all
outgoing mail into a file, except for mail sent to certain lists etc.

Right now I have:

fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date +%d-%b-%Y`

...which sends all my outgoing mail to
~/Mail/sent-mail/sent-mail-[day-month-year]

Would it work if I added, for instance, these lines:

fcc-save-hook '~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
+sent-mail/sent-mail-hackers-`date +%d-%b-%Y`

fcc-save-hook '~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
+sent-mail/sent-mail-hackers-`date +%d-%b-%Y`

fcc-save-hook '~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
+sent-mail/sent-mail-current-`date +%d-%b-%Y`

Basically I just want all mail going to certain lists / people saved in
certain places, and everything else saved in some default place...

Thanks.

-- 
-Munish



Re: binding a key to forward mail

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Gary, et al --

Thanks again for the help with this.  I finally got it working properly!

...and then Gary Johnson said...
% On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:21:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%  
%  Hmmm...  push in the macro, you mean?  That's certainly an idea; thanks!
% 
% Yes, that's what I meant.  For example, I tried this just to see if it
% would work:
% 
% :macro pager G :push mail^Mgaryjohn^M^Mtest message^My
% 
% The third ^M is needed because I have askcc set.

Interestingly enough, I had to work it down to

  macro generic ,f enter-commandpush tag-prefixforward-messagesc

y

to get it to work.  Where the two ctrl-Ms are I had both enter and a
single ctrl-M but every time I'd run the macro I'd end up with

  To: scy

sitting on my screen; it's as though the first return gets swallowed.  It
also works with enterenter which also supports that [bizarre] theory.

Anyway, I'm a VERY happy camper :-)  Thanks again!


% 
% Gary
% 
% -- 
% Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
% http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21659/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: fcc-save-hook

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Munish --

...and then Munish Chopra said...
% 
% Hi,

Hello!


% 
% I couldn't find too much helpful stuff through google or the archives,
% so here goes...

At least you looked first; thanks! :-)


% 
% I'm trying to construct a fcc-save-hook thingamajig that will save all
% outgoing mail into a file, except for mail sent to certain lists etc.
% 
% Right now I have:
% 
% fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date +%d-%b-%Y`
% 
% ...which sends all my outgoing mail to
% ~/Mail/sent-mail/sent-mail-[day-month-year]

Man, that must play hell with your sorting :-)  Why not Y-M-D instead,
I wonder?


% 
% Would it work if I added, for instance, these lines:
% 
% fcc-save-hook '~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
% +sent-mail/sent-mail-hackers-`date +%d-%b-%Y`

Looks fine to me.  Why not just try it and see what you get?  You don't
even have to really send any email; just put the hooks in and then start
to send some mail and check the Fcc: value at the compose menu and then
abort the message and move on to the next test case (you, a friend, a 
possible regexp match like hackers@yourbox, and the lists themselves).


HTH  HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21660/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: fcc-save-hook

2001-12-17 Thread Munish Chopra

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:12:08AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
 % 
 % fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date +%d-%b-%Y`
 % 
 % ...which sends all my outgoing mail to
 % ~/Mail/sent-mail/sent-mail-[day-month-year]
 
 Man, that must play hell with your sorting :-)  Why not Y-M-D instead,
 I wonder?
 

Umm...yeah. That was just plain stupid. Thanks ;)

While I'm at it, is there some kind of hook for moving deleted mail
around? I know, I didn't check this time...so pointers are welcome!

-- 
-Munish



Re: fcc-save-hook

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Munish --

...and then Munish Chopra said...
% 
% On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:12:08AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%  % 
%  % fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date +%d-%b-%Y`
%  % 
%  % ...which sends all my outgoing mail to
%  % ~/Mail/sent-mail/sent-mail-[day-month-year]
%  
%  Man, that must play hell with your sorting :-)  Why not Y-M-D instead,
%  I wonder?
% 
% Umm...yeah. That was just plain stupid. Thanks ;)

No problem :-)  I notice that sort of thing, whether I *should* or not...


% 
% While I'm at it, is there some kind of hook for moving deleted mail
% around? I know, I didn't check this time...so pointers are welcome!

Um, how do you mean?  Once it's deleted, it's gone, so there isn't much
to move :-)  Do you mean moving mail that's flagged for deletion but has
not been purged?

Cedric Duval has a trash-folder patch that provides recycle-bin-like
recovery functionality that you might find interesting.

If that's not it, please elucidate.


% 
% -- 
% -Munish

HTH  HAND


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21662/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: abort_nosubject=ask-no not working as expected

2001-12-17 Thread John P . Verel

Thanks.  That works.

Nowif I could just figure out how to keep Mutt from putting double
quotes around my name in the from line?

John
On 12/16/01, 11:23:41PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 16, 2001, John P . Verel wrote:
  Does the abort_nosubject option work in 1.2.5?  My .muttrc entry is:
  
  set abort_nosubject=ask-no
  
  Based on the manual, I'd have thought that when I press y to send a
  message with no subject, I would not be prompted to abort or send.  Yet,
  I'm still asked.
  
  What am I missing?
 
 If you don't want to be asked, use:
 
 set abort_nosubject=no
 
 
 -Ken

-- 
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!



Re: Quoting when replying

2001-12-17 Thread Cedric Duval

Hi Thorsten, David, and all

% As others have said, you cannot set your comments apart by using a
% different quote sign.
% As others have noticed, uniqueness is a Bad Thing in today's email
% environment.

Well, the one and only argument of David is the uniqueness? Then let's
defeat it.

I suggest that everyone adds these two lines in his muttrc:

  send-hook .  'set indent_string= '
  send-hook '~x @sector13' 'set indent_string=% '

This way, for every discussion David is involved in, the uniqueness of
%  will disappear. Perhaps he will then change his mind...

PS: just kidding  ;)
PPS: oh my, I cannot believe I've used this awful indent_string!  :/
-- 
Cedric



Re: Quoting when replying, and whatnot...

2001-12-17 Thread tim lupfer

On Dec 17 at 01:39PM Thorsten Haude wrote:

 Hi,

 * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 20:12]:

could your attribution string be any more inane? I mean, come on, an
asterisk? they just aren't IN anymore. and brackets in conjunction
with a dating mechanism so unfamiliar and unamerican? that's CRAZY!
my entire morning has been ruined, thanks.

Seriously though, tolerance is a good thing, we don't need any
mutt-user-on-mutt-user violence for the outlook-run news media to
pick up on and make example of.

[...]

-- 
tim lupfer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
familiarity breeds contempt--and children.
 --mark twain



msg21665/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: fcc-save-hook

2001-12-17 Thread Munish Chopra

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:26:06AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
 
 % 
 % While I'm at it, is there some kind of hook for moving deleted mail
 % around? I know, I didn't check this time...so pointers are welcome!
 
 Um, how do you mean?  Once it's deleted, it's gone, so there isn't much
 to move :-)  Do you mean moving mail that's flagged for deletion but has
 not been purged?
 
 Cedric Duval has a trash-folder patch that provides recycle-bin-like
 recovery functionality that you might find interesting.
 
 If that's not it, please elucidate.
 

No, actually I think that's exactly what I meant. I'll look for it.
Thanks.

-- 
-Munish



Re: abort_nosubject=ask-no not working as expected

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

John --

...and then John P . Verel said...
% 
% Nowif I could just figure out how to keep Mutt from putting double
% quotes around my name in the from line?

You should have started a new thread ;-)

I'm afraid you're stuck with 'em until you remove the period from your
fullname.  IIRC it's part of the RFC spec, but I at least know that it's
come up on the list before.  I expect someone can provide you a pointer
to the authoritative reference, though :-)


% 
% John


HTH  HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21667/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: fcc-save-hook

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Munish --

...and then Munish Chopra said...
% 
% On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:26:06AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%  
%  Cedric Duval has a trash-folder patch that provides recycle-bin-like
%  recovery functionality that you might find interesting.
...
% 
% No, actually I think that's exactly what I meant. I'll look for it.

His site is

  http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/

and you can also find it at

  http://mutt.justpickone.org/mutt-build-cocktail

in the file listing.


% Thanks.

HTH!


% 
% -- 
% -Munish


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21668/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Quoting when replying

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Cedric, et al --

...and then Cedric Duval said...
% 
% Hi Thorsten, David, and all

Hello!


% 
% % As others have said, you cannot set your comments apart by using a
% % different quote sign.
% % As others have noticed, uniqueness is a Bad Thing in today's email
% % environment.
% 
% Well, the one and only argument of David is the uniqueness? Then let's
% defeat it.

Oh, now you've done it, buddy!


o/
/o 
o/
/o I suggest that everyone adds these two lines in his muttrc:
o/
/o 
o/
/o send-hook .  'set indent_string= '
o/
/o send-hook '~x @sector13' 'set indent_string=% '

Match *that* if you can!


o/
/o 
o/
/o This way, for every discussion David is involved in, the uniqueness of
o/
/o %  will disappear. Perhaps he will then change his mind...

No, I will see it as the grand unification of Good Quote Characters,
because I also happen to think that % is prettier than  anyway.


o/
/o 
o/
/o PS: just kidding  ;)

Same here :-)


o/
/o PPS: oh my, I cannot believe I've used this awful indent_string!  :/

Yeah, and who is this PPS guy who quotes with : anyway, and why are you
quoting him and his little brother PS here?


% -- 
% Cedric


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21669/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Changing file browser settings for Mail folder

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser

 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:27:48 +0100
 From: Balazs Javor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: MUTT Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Changing file browser settings for Mail folder
 
 Hi,
 
 I was trying to change the folder_format for just my
 ~/Mail folder where I store my mailboxes.

Hi Balazs,

have you received a reply to your question off-list perhaps?

-- 
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
3:28PM up 2:24, 7 users, load averages: 0.16, 0.07, 0.02



Re: Quoting when replying

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Thorsten, et al --

...and then Thorsten Haude said...
% 
% Hi,

Hello!


% 
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 20:12]:
% We had an exchange on this one before, but the more I see it, the less
% I like it.

Fair enough.


% 
% It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
...
% track of who said what when.  To set my comments apart from others'
% I started using %_ (the common notation for a trailing space, just
...
% As others have said, you cannot set your comments apart by using a
% different quote sign.

While others may have said it, and some may even believe it, I don't get
it.  It makes sense to me to have a mixture of indent chars in a
discussion, and it makes things clearer for me.  To each his own.


% As others have noticed, uniqueness is a Bad Thing in today's email
% environment.

Admitted -- but I also see room for flexibility and configuration
choices.  I mean, c'mon, LookOut! will even handle %_ gracefully (well,
as gracefully as it can handle anything)!


% I can't really say what went on in Usenet when we were young, but I
% can definitely say that your quote sign makes your mails harder to
% read. Since you know this, you must should have a very good reason to
% use it anyway. Please tell us.

Other than the fact that I just plain like the character and have no
great fondness for '', and the opinion that % is nicer anyway, I don't
have any other reasons.  At least, none of which I can think, and I
promise I'm *not* just trying to be stubborn.


% 
% I've simply kept it since then, and it's relatively unique and still
% recognizable.
% When I was young, I spent a lot of time in Fido. I prepended the quote
% sign with the initials, just like discussed before.

Yep.


% This was only possible because I and 80% of everyone else used
% Crosspoint, which not only knew how to display this thing, but could
% also reliably reflow quotes, keeping everything neat even at the 10th

Sounds lovely.


% quoting level. (It was also made easier by compulsory clear names.)
% This was very useful, since you could see with one look who wrote the
% quote (not who quoted it). It was color-coded of course. Nobody had

Sure.  That sounds like Rob's argument, though.


% any problems, because everyone either used Crosspoint or started using
% it very soon, so it was accepted standard.

Great!  I predict the same thing with %_ and mutt.  I look forward to the
time when 80% of everyone else will use mutt right along with us -- and
perhaps find the world a better place as well.


% 
% I don't use initials anymore, because most MUAs/editors would break.
% You keep your bad habit even though you are fully aware that your
% quoting style does the same. This without giving any reason but
% personal tradition.

There are a lot of things that I do purely out of personal tradition or
belief, and I'm not about to change that.  There are even things that
I do to incorporate the traditions or beliefs of others -- and I mean
in as simple a way as a writing style, without getting into the whole
arena of what might more typically be considered belief tolerance or
whatever politically correct name such things might have today.  In this
particular case I firmly believe that the proper tool -- mutt -- exists
and has the configuration capability to work *with* my particular style
and further believe that anyone else (particularly those already using
mutt) has the ability to choose whether or not to incorporate my practice.


% 
% Your mails are as ineffective as outlooked mails with the answer
% following the questions.

Oooh, that was way harsh.  

I understand ineffective to mean that any message I might have is
utterly lost -- something that I wouldn't even say about the upside-down
quoting of Outhouse -- and is just noise in the ether.  I'm sorry that
you feel that way.  Of course, you may not receive my condolences, given
the entirely ineffective method of their delivery.  Sorry about that, too
(begin endless loop about here).


% 
% Hey, at least mine is easy to match with $quote_regexp!
% I don't change my mutt.rc for individuals who are not me.

Fair enough.  There are probably a lot of variables that you don't
need, then.  Maybe I should petition to get % added to the default list
so that you will be able to read my mail.


% 
% Thorsten
% -- 
% If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
%   - Sir Isaac Newton


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21671/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Getting rid of quotes in name (new thread;)

2001-12-17 Thread John P Verel

Yep, losing the period did it.  Thanks, David

John
On 12/17/01, 09:13:56AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
 John --
 
 ...and then John P . Verel said...
 % 
 % Nowif I could just figure out how to keep Mutt from putting double
 % quotes around my name in the from line?
 
 You should have started a new thread ;-)
 
 I'm afraid you're stuck with 'em until you remove the period from your
 fullname.  IIRC it's part of the RFC spec, but I at least know that it's
 come up on the list before.  I expect someone can provide you a pointer
 to the authoritative reference, though :-)
 
 
 % 
 % John
 
 
 HTH  HAND
 
 :-D
 -- 
 David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
 (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
 (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
 



-- 
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!



mutt sample setup files (was: Email HowTo)

2001-12-17 Thread Sven Guckes

* Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 17:40]:
 On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
  what parts of mutt's documentation have you found lacking?
  What are your patterns of use of mutt, and did you have
  hard time setting it up the way you wanted, or was
  everything you needed obvious from the manual?
 Not really - here are some stuff I thought was lacking :
 - A verbose .rc file, like the one Sven Guckes has for vim
 Is there something like this for Mutt too?

see here..

http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/setup/mutt*
990 Nov 18  2000 mutt.color
   8670 Aug  1 19:22 mutt.color.body
   6603 Nov 12 07:32 mutt.color.header
  17864 Nov 12 07:42 mutt.color.header.agents
  11135 Aug  6 05:01 mutt.color.index
  29273 Nov 20 07:34 mutt.personal
   1530 Oct 12 18:43 mutt.pop
   5573 Apr 18  2000 mutt.rainbow
   3200 Nov 17  1999 mutt_like_pine
834 Nov  1 21:41 muttrc
  43104 Nov 11 23:54 muttrc.forall
   6812 Sep 18 10:59 muttrc.minimal

knock yourself out! :-)

Sven

-- 
Sven [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mutt-versions]  Latest versions:
MUTT http://www.mutt.org/  news:comp.mail.mutt  mutt-1.2.5   [000729]
MUTT http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/ mutt-1.3.24  [011130]
MUTT MUTT - *the* mailer for UNIX with color, threading, IMAP+MIME+PGP+POP



Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread Michael Wagner

On Sonntag, 16. Dez. 2001 at 12:12:12, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:

When you are sending mails to an lists address both the list and your
address are in the MFT header, when sending to an subscribed address
only the list address is in the MFT header.

Hello Nicolas,

this is not correct. When you only take the list command, mutt don't
generate a Mail-Followup-To header. With subscribe it will generate
it. When you don't want your adress in the Mail-Followup-To header,
you must have this in your .muttrc:

-snip---
set followup_to
unset metoo
-snip---

In the manual there is in the section 6.3.50. followup_to the
following explanation:

--snip--
Controls whether or not the Mail-Followup-To header field is generated
when sending mail.  When set, Mutt will generate this field when you
are replying to a known mailing list, specified with the ``subscribe''
or lists commands.
--snip--

Hth Michael

-- 
Registred Linux-User: 183712
GnuPG Key: B3F038DC 
GnuPG-fingerprint: 21A7 B384 6629 F320 8AFC  A2B5 4071 E5C3 B3F0 38DC



Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread Andreas Landmark

On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:28:09PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
 * Benjamin Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
  On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:53:27AM +0200, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
   subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   -clip-
   
   It can get long, huh? :-)
 
 Not when you generate it automatically.  I have about 4 lines for 45 lists :)
 
 The originator of this thread also does this, since his setup is based
 on the same stuff mine is :)
 
  I've never really understood the difference between using 'subscribe'
  and 'lists' to specify a mailing list. I've just looked in the manual
  and it does seems to have anything enlightening in it so, could
  someone perhaps clarify it for me?
 
 lists instructs mutt that a certain address is a mailing list, subscribe
 tells it you are actually *on* that mailing list; without subscribe, the
 Mail-Followup-To header is set so you get replies as well as the list,
 so you can track threads from messages you send to a list you're not on.
 

While we're on the subject of the difference of subscribe and lists, can
anybody tell me how to get the functionality of subscribe (I.E.
Mail-Followup-To set correctly), but still show the sender instead of
the listname in the From-field in the mailbox-index?

(I'm sure there is a dead-easy solution that I've missed in the manual)
-- 
Andreas D Landmark / noXtension
God is the tangential point between zero and infinity.
-- Alfred Jarry



Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser

 Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:36:49 +0100
 From: Andreas Landmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Mailing list replies
 
 While we're on the subject of the difference of subscribe and lists, can
 anybody tell me how to get the functionality of subscribe (I.E.
 Mail-Followup-To set correctly), but still show the sender instead of
 the listname in the From-field in the mailbox-index?
 
I guess you're looking for manual-6.html#index_format, specifically
the %F expando. (The default value of $index_format contains %L
instead, the list address -- you don't need to see it in the index
when all the trafic from the list ends up in this folder. :)

-- 
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
4:41PM up 3:36, 7 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.03, 0.00



Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread Ben Compton

On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:36:49PM +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote: 
 While we're on the subject of the difference of subscribe and lists, can
 anybody tell me how to get the functionality of subscribe (I.E.
 Mail-Followup-To set correctly), but still show the sender instead of
 the listname in the From-field in the mailbox-index?

use %F instead of %L in your index_format.

-ben



Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread René Clerc

* Andreas Landmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-12-2001 16:21]:

| While we're on the subject of the difference of subscribe and lists, can
| anybody tell me how to get the functionality of subscribe (I.E.
| Mail-Followup-To set correctly), but still show the sender instead of
| the listname in the From-field in the mailbox-index?
| 
| (I'm sure there is a dead-easy solution that I've missed in the manual)

There is ;)

check out $index_format:

by default, it contains %L (list-from); if you replace this by %F, it
will show the author name instead of the list name. Except, of course,
if the message is *from* you: in that case, it contains the recipient.

HTH,

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Definition of Atheism: a non-prophet organization.



msg21678/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Quoting when replying, and whatnot...

2001-12-17 Thread René Clerc

* tim lupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-12-2001 15:08]:

| On Dec 17 at 01:39PM Thorsten Haude wrote:
| 
|  Hi,
| 
|  * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 20:12]:
| 
| could your attribution string be any more inane? I mean, come on, an
| asterisk? they just aren't IN anymore. and brackets in conjunction
| with a dating mechanism so unfamiliar and unamerican? that's CRAZY!
| my entire morning has been ruined, thanks.

Sven, got something to say on this? ;)

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

No woman, no cry.
-Bob Marley 



msg21679/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread 2sheds

I have all my mail sorted in a number of mailboxes and when I change
from one to another (i.e. go to file browser and select needed mailbox)
cursor is always at the top. Is it possible to make it stay on the last
open file, not jump to the top?

-- 
Oleg Kourapov | Linux user #245698 http://counter.li.org
Moscow, RU| LFS user #1212 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
  --
Yesterday is a memory.
Tomorrow is the unknown.
Now is the knowing.
  --

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GTW d- s+: a-- C UL++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N++ o-- K++ w-- 
O M- V- PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP++ t 5++ X++ R tv- b+++ DI+ D 
G e* h! r y? 
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--



msg21680/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser

 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:13:08 +0300
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Mutt file browser question
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I have all my mail sorted in a number of mailboxes and when I change
 from one to another (i.e. go to file browser and select needed mailbox)
 cursor is always at the top. Is it possible to make it stay on the last
 open file, not jump to the top?

I would also love to know if this is possible... If it's not, what
are the chances of this feature getting implemented?

-- 
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
5:32PM up 4:27, 8 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00



Another command line question

2001-12-17 Thread Barney Wells

I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5.
A few weeks ago I asked about attaching files;

mutt -x -s testing -a test.file username /dev/null

This works great. Now I want to send text that is
not in a file. It is fields out of my database. 
I would like this to appear in the body of the e-mail
message. Here is an example:

mutt -x -s testing this is what I want to say username /dev/null

As you know this syntax does not work.
Thanks,
BW


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com



Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread Volker Moell

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have all my mail sorted in a number of mailboxes and when I change
 from one to another (i.e. go to file browser and select needed mailbox)
 cursor is always at the top. Is it possible to make it stay on the last
 open file, not jump to the top?

Try patch-1.3.23.bj.current_shortcut.1 at
http://home.worldonline.dk/~byrial/mutt/patches/
(It works with 1.2.14, too.)

   ^ -- refers to the current open mailbox if any

Maybe this is what you mean.

Greets,

-volker

-- 
  http://die-Moells.de/  *  http://Stama90.de/  *  http://ScriptDale.de/

One way to stop a runaway horse is to bet on him.



msg21683/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Another command line question

2001-12-17 Thread Lars Hecking

Barney Wells writes:
 I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5.
 A few weeks ago I asked about attaching files;
 
 mutt -x -s testing -a test.file username /dev/null
 
 This works great. Now I want to send text that is
 not in a file. It is fields out of my database. 
 I would like this to appear in the body of the e-mail
 message. Here is an example:
 
 mutt -x -s testing this is what I want to say username /dev/null
 
 As you know this syntax does not work.

 /command/to/extract/your/message/from/the/database | mutt -s testing username

 -x is not needed because mutt is not used interactively if used like above.




Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread Volker Moell

Volker Moell wrote:

 (It works with 1.2.14, too.)

Sorry, typo^2.
I certainly mean 1.3.24.

Greets,

-volker

-- 
  http://die-Moells.de/  *  http://Stama90.de/  *  http://ScriptDale.de/

fortune: cpu time/usefulness ratio too high -- core dumped.



msg21685/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread John P Verel

I have the following in my .muttrc:
folder-hook =mbox 'push odendl~Nenter

What it does when I open my mbox, sorts the entries by date, goes to the
last (bottom) one and then just shows new (unread) entries.  Perhaps
this will help you?

John
On 12/17/01, 07:13:08PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have all my mail sorted in a number of mailboxes and when I change
 from one to another (i.e. go to file browser and select needed mailbox)
 cursor is always at the top. Is it possible to make it stay on the last
 open file, not jump to the top?
 
 -- 
 Oleg Kourapov | Linux user #245698 http://counter.li.org
 Moscow, RU| LFS user #1212 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
   --
 Yesterday is a memory.
 Tomorrow is the unknown.
 Now is the knowing.
   --
 
 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
 Version: 3.12
 GTW d- s+: a-- C UL++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N++ o-- K++ w-- 
 O M- V- PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP++ t 5++ X++ R tv- b+++ DI+ D 
 G e* h! r y? 
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--



-- 
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!



Matching with ~h over IMAP

2001-12-17 Thread Ben Beuchler

I use spamassassin which tags suspected spam with a header that looks like
this:

X-Spam-Flag: YES

I'm using the '~h' pattern modifier to match messages with that header.
However, it appears that instead of just fetching the headers, mutt is
fetching the complete message for every message in my inbox in order to
match that pattern.  Is that correct?  Is it possible I have something
misconfigured?

-Ben

-- 
Ben Beuchler   There is no spoon.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-- The Matrix



auto_view problem

2001-12-17 Thread Roman Neuhauser

Hi there,

I started playing with auto_view, but stumbled upon a problem:

roman@roman ~  grep tar-gz /usr/local/etc/mime.types
application/x-tar-gztgz tar.gz
roman@roman ~  grep tar-gz ~/.mailcap
application/x-tar-gz; tar tzf -;copiousoutput

[-- Attachment #2: mutt-manual.html.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar-gz, Encoding: base64, Size: 96K --]

[-- application/x-tar-gz is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]

application/x-tar-gz; gunzip -c %s|tar tf -;copiousoutput

or

application/x-tar-gz; tar tzf -;copiousoutput

didn't help either. Interestingly enough, this works just fine:

image/*; anytopnm %s|pnmscale -xs 70 |ppmtopgm|pgmtopbm|pbmtoascii; \
copiousoutput

Any ideas what's wrong?

-- 
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
7:24PM up 6:19, 9 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.09, 0.05



Re: Quoting when replying, and whatnot...

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas Hurst

% tim lupfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 On Dec 17 at 01:39PM Thorsten Haude wrote:
 
  * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 20:12]:
 
 could your attribution string be any more inane? I mean, come on, an
 asterisk? they just aren't IN anymore.

How about @?  @'s always in :)

Oh, I know, % :)

btw, does attribution support optional entries, so when, for instance,
the person you're replying to only has an address field, only that's
shown, rather than * foo@bar (foo@bar) wrote: ?

 and brackets in conjunction with a dating mechanism so unfamiliar and
 unamerican?

MM/DD/YY is so braindead.  But then, what do you expect from a country
full of people who can't even spell colour :P

Anyway, I don't bother with the date, if you need information that
detailed, look up the thread, same rationalle for deeply nested quotes
who's attribution's been lost.  99% of the time, I doubt anyone cares.

 Seriously though, tolerance is a good thing, we don't need any
 mutt-user-on-mutt-user violence for the outlook-run news media to pick
 up on and make example of.

I guess we could all set our attribution lines to 'begin 666 ...' and
convince their clients the mail's corrupt binary data :)

-- 
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  http://www.aagh.net/



Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas Hurst

* John P Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 I have the following in my .muttrc: folder-hook =mbox 'push
 odendl~Nenter

 What it does when I open my mbox, sorts the entries by date, goes
 to the last (bottom) one and then just shows new (unread) entries.
 Perhaps this will help you?

I think he means the browser, not the message list (i.e.
'change-folder?').

I certainly think it could do with some enhancements; limit support (I
have quite a few mailboxes, so limiting to ones with just new messages
would be Good[tm]), colours etc.

-- 
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  http://www.aagh.net/



Re: utf-8 display problem index vs. pager

2001-12-17 Thread Cristian

Hi Stephan!

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:38:45AM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
 Strange, never w3m nor lynx can correctly display
 http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/manga.html. But w3mmee does.

Plain w3m had wide character support only the for Japanese character
sets Shift_JIS, EUC_JP, and ISO-2022-JP.

In order to view UTF-8, you need to get the w3m-m17n patch from
http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Ehsaka/w3m/

w3mmee is an independent patch for the same purpose.

Lynx has a setting for this. My ~/.lynxrc contains the line,
character_set=UNICODE (UTF-8)
Though I hardly use it now that there's w3m.

 vim since 6.0.

Accepts UTF-8 only if you set $LC_ALL correctly. My point was that all
the programs I listed worked fine after I just set $LANG.

 Do you have ncurses compiled with wide-char-support, and mutt is link
 againts libncursesw.so.5.2?
 The standard ncurses never really worked for me, but now Debian has
 the slang-utf8 package in testing, so it works fine with mutt.

I have ncurses compiled by SuSE for their distro v7.2. The Mutt I built
myself is linked against libncurses.so.5. I don't have libncursesw.so.5.2.

 Hm, two problems exist until now:
 German gpg messages aren't display correctly, 

Is this problem generally known? If not, please provide details.

Greetings from Saarbruecken,
Cristian

-- 

}{  Cristian Pietsch
}{  http://www.interling.de



msg21692/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: utf-8 display problem index vs. pager

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas E. Dickey

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Cristian wrote:

 Hi Stephan!

 On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:38:45AM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
  Strange, never w3m nor lynx can correctly display
  http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/manga.html. But w3mmee does.

 Plain w3m had wide character support only the for Japanese character
 sets Shift_JIS, EUC_JP, and ISO-2022-JP.

 In order to view UTF-8, you need to get the w3m-m17n patch from
 http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Ehsaka/w3m/

 w3mmee is an independent patch for the same purpose.

 Lynx has a setting for this. My ~/.lynxrc contains the line,
 character_set=UNICODE (UTF-8)
 Though I hardly use it now that there's w3m.

That works better with the libncursesw.  I added a few sample files for
UTF-8 as I was testing.  w3m itself doesn't do very well on those - you
must be referring to one of the patched w3m packages.  (I looked into
setting one up, but it seemed geared solely toward CJK support).

  Do you have ncurses compiled with wide-char-support, and mutt is link
  againts libncursesw.so.5.2?
  The standard ncurses never really worked for me, but now Debian has

It wasn't designed to do this (nor in fact is the standard slang package).

  the slang-utf8 package in testing, so it works fine with mutt.

 I have ncurses compiled by SuSE for their distro v7.2. The Mutt I built
 myself is linked against libncurses.so.5. I don't have libncursesw.so.5.2.

I don't think anyone is packaging it.  Debian may (it's mostly a matter of
people finding time).

-- 
T.E.Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net




Re: how to display messages on the last line

2001-12-17 Thread Bruno Postle

On Sun 16-Dec-2001 at 11:49:44PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
 * Gregor Zattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-12-2001 22:30]:
 
 | is there a way to display a message on the last line (below the status
 | bar if status_on_top=no)? 
 | 
 | I would like to display a message when a special hook gets triggered.
 
 Please give some more information what it is exactly what you want. I,
 for instance, have no idea whatsoever.

I assume the question is about hooks outputting text-strings in the line
where mutt-messages and errors appear.

It doesn't seem to be possible to do it properly - Here's a nasty macro
that hi-jacks a mutt variable to store and deliver the message:

macro generic F2 \
enter-command'set escape=Message from a macro'enter\
enter-command'set ?escape'enter \
'print a stupid message'

I suspect real text feedback from macros and hooks would be a handy
accessibility feature.

-- 
Bruno



Re: Mutt file browser question

2001-12-17 Thread 2sheds

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:53:57AM -0500, John P Verel wrote:
 I have the following in my .muttrc:
 folder-hook =mbox 'push odendl~Nenter
 
 What it does when I open my mbox, sorts the entries by date, goes to the
 last (bottom) one and then just shows new (unread) entries.  Perhaps
 this will help you?

Thanks for this suggestion, but this hook is rather for 'index' view, while
I was asking about 'browser'.

-- 
Oleg Kourapov | Linux user #245698 http://counter.li.org
Moscow, RU| LFS user #1212 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
  --
Yesterday is a memory.
Tomorrow is the unknown.
Now is the knowing.
  --

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GTW d- s+: a-- C UL++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N++ o-- K++ w-- 
O M- V- PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP++ t 5++ X++ R tv- b+++ DI+ D 
G e* h! r y? 
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--



msg21695/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mailing list replies

2001-12-17 Thread Benjamin Smith

On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:36:49PM +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
 While we're on the subject of the difference of subscribe and lists, can
 anybody tell me how to get the functionality of subscribe (I.E.
 Mail-Followup-To set correctly), but still show the sender instead of
 the listname in the From-field in the mailbox-index?

One useful (default) keybinding is @ which tells you the From: header
in the status bar.


 
 (I'm sure there is a dead-easy solution that I've missed in the manual)
 -- 
 Andreas D Landmark / noXtension
 God is the tangential point between zero and infinity.
   -- Alfred Jarry

-- 
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



msg21696/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: how to display messages on the last line

2001-12-17 Thread René Clerc

* Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-12-2001 22:18]:

| On Sun 16-Dec-2001 at 11:49:44PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
|  * Gregor Zattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-12-2001 22:30]:
|  
|  | is there a way to display a message on the last line (below the status
|  | bar if status_on_top=no)? 
|  | 
|  | I would like to display a message when a special hook gets triggered.
| 
| I assume the question is about hooks outputting text-strings in the line
| where mutt-messages and errors appear.

Don't know why I couldn't derive this myself; Gregor, you're post was
clear enough.

I checked with the source; it shouldn't be that hard to code. But all
depends on the exact features you want.

For clarity reasons: this was not an offer to implement it ;)

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Originality does not consist in saying what no one has ever said before,
but in saying exactly what you think yourself.
-James Stephens



msg21697/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Quoting when replying

2001-12-17 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:39:29AM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
 % Hi,
 
 Hello!

'sup?

 % As others have noticed, uniqueness is a Bad Thing in today's email
 % environment.
 
 Admitted -- but I also see room for flexibility and configuration
 choices.  I mean, c'mon, LookOut! will even handle %_ gracefully (well,
 as gracefully as it can handle anything)!

The only thing LookOut! handles gracefully is virus propagation :)

 % quoting level. (It was also made easier by compulsory clear names.)
 % This was very useful, since you could see with one look who wrote the
 % quote (not who quoted it). It was color-coded of course. Nobody had
 
 Sure.  That sounds like Rob's argument, though.

Just you wait! Soon, we'll all be using our unique quoting characters!
Everybody will have a different one!! MWAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!

;D

 % any problems, because everyone either used Crosspoint or started using
 % it very soon, so it was accepted standard.
 
 Great!  I predict the same thing with %_ and mutt.  I look forward to the
 time when 80% of everyone else will use mutt right along with us -- and
 perhaps find the world a better place as well.

I don't see that happening. Given most people's utter dependence on GUIs
(just look at Macs), I don't think mutt will ever get 80% of the MUA
market share. It may get to be 80% of _*nix_ users MUA of choice, but
unless *nix (Linux, BSD, whatever) gets really mainstream, it won't
happen.

 % Your mails are as ineffective as outlooked mails with the answer
 % following the questions.
 
 Oooh, that was way harsh.  

I didn't like that comment, either. It's a quote string! Get over it!

 Fair enough.  There are probably a lot of variables that you don't
 need, then.  Maybe I should petition to get % added to the default list
 so that you will be able to read my mail.

I'd sign that petition ;)

-- 
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The Windows NT workstations locked up every 2.58 minutes... The Linux
workstations [which replaced them] haven't had a problem.
-- Randy Kessell, SBC Communications Inc.



msg21698/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Quoting when replying

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas Hurst

* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:39:29AM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my
 inbox with:

  Great!  I predict the same thing with %_ and mutt.  I look forward
  to the time when 80% of everyone else will use mutt right along with
  us -- and perhaps find the world a better place as well.

 I don't see that happening. Given most people's utter dependence on
 GUIs (just look at Macs), I don't think mutt will ever get 80% of the
 MUA market share. It may get to be 80% of _*nix_ users MUA of choice,
 but unless *nix (Linux, BSD, whatever) gets really mainstream, it
 won't happen.

With Evolution?  No way.  The best we can hope (and push) for is to have
some good standards set out and implimented.

Personally I'm looking to get Mail-Followup-To supported in Microdot-II,
and probably Yam (both Amiga clients).

 I didn't like that comment, either. It's a quote string! Get over it!

I just hit F2 and they magically turn into ' ' :)

  Fair enough.  There are probably a lot of variables that you don't
  need, then.  Maybe I should petition to get % added to the default
  list so that you will be able to read my mail.

 I'd sign that petition ;)

Let's just get it set to a constant so evil users can't change it.  Oh,
and close source the part of the code containing it, and add anti-pirate
code to it.

-- 
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  http://www.aagh.net/



save all outgoing messages to Fcc _and_ =sent

2001-12-17 Thread Eric Smith

so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail
regardless of where is is fcc'ed?

a simple (mutt) solution?

-- 
Eric Smith



Re: save all outgoing messages to Fcc _and_ =sent

2001-12-17 Thread David T-G

Eric --

...and then Eric Smith said...
% 
% so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail
% regardless of where is is fcc'ed?
% 
% a simple (mutt) solution?

Why not just set sent=+sentmail or such?  Don't use the fcc function (or
hook it to the same place) since you want it all there.

If you want it together but yet separate, perhaps you could use something
like

  fcc-hook . =D.sent/%_%O

to save it in the original file name but under the D.sent directory under
your $MAIL dir...  (Oh, yeah -- the %_ ensures that the filename will be
lower case.)


% 
% -- 
% Eric Smith


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg21701/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: urlview and bound macro

2001-12-17 Thread Brian Clark

* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 18:40]:

  1.3.24i

[...]

 I'm using 1.3.23, perhaps this is a new bug?

 Also, I vaguely remember having trouble like this with 1.3.15i, but I
 can't remember any specifics or how I worked around it, sorry. 

It seems as though I've dug up the solution after many moons of
googling. Sorry for the really late reply; I want to get this in a few
archives.

The problem is that my Mutt (or maybe 1.3.24?) won't use pipes. I have
to use this:

macro index \Cb pipe-messageurlview\n
macro pager \Cb pipe-messageurlview\n

..instead of this:

macro index \Cb |urlview\n
macro pager \Cb |urlview\n

And that ^^^ is still in the manual:

http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.13

Maybe that should be replaced with my solution?

-- 
Brian Clark | Avoiding the general public since 1805!
Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8
Most people do not know how to behave in a massacre.




Re: save all outgoing messages to Fcc _and_ =sent

2001-12-17 Thread Thorsten Haude

Hi,

* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 02:17]:
(Oh, yeah -- the %_ ensures that the filename will be lower case.)
Huh?

Thorsten
-- 
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich.
- Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1