Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

2016-09-19 Thread Alon Marx
Thank you ALL for clearing up this issue. To sum up the discussion (not going into too many details): >From legal stand point, if one uses python libraries they should be part of the community or confirming with the relevant licenses ( http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html).

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Eduardo Gonzalez
+1 to option 2. Regards On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 10:34 PM Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot) < vhosa...@cisco.com> wrote: > I vote for option 2. > > Regards, > Vikram Hosakote > IRC: vhosakot > > From: Ryan Hallisey > > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > I think there's some mileage in some further work on adding local LVM, > since things like striping/mirroring for performace can be done. We can > prototype it and get the numbers before even thinking about merging

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]freeze date and tricircle splitting

2016-09-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
This announcement should have been first to avoid any unnecessary work -; On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:51 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, as the Trio2o repository has been established, it's time for us to > discuss the freeze date and tagging(newton branch) for the last release

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]freeze date and tricircle splitting

2016-09-19 Thread joehuang
Hello, as the Trio2o repository has been established, it's time for us to discuss the freeze date and tagging(newton branch) for the last release of Tricircle with gateway function. The freeze date is the gate for patches to be merged before tagging(newton branch). If a patch can't finish

Re: [openstack-dev] Too many mails on announce list again :)

2016-09-19 Thread Steve Martinelli
I think bundling the puppet, ansible and oslo releases together would cut down on a considerable amount of traffic. Bundling or grouping new releases may not be the most accurate, but if it encourages the right folks to read the content instead of brushing it off, I think thats worth while. On

[openstack-dev] Too many mails on announce list again :)

2016-09-19 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi all, Last November, we discussed the OpenStack-announce list, defined its purpose more finely and moved some internal library announcements to -dev[1]. For reference, we describe the list as: """ Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the OpenStack Release Team

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Browser Support

2016-09-19 Thread Jason Rist
This page hasn't been updated for a while - does anyone know the latest? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Horizon/BrowserSupport Thanks, Jason -- Jason E. Rist Senior Software Engineer OpenStack User Interfaces Red Hat, Inc. openuc: +1.972.707.6408 mobile: +1.720.256.3933 Freenode: jrist

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE][kuryr] kuryr-lib

2016-09-19 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > Hi, > > We recently made the first release (0.1.0) of kuryr-lib on which no > project depends except openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. Now, kuryr-lib by > itself is not more than a base library and its release is only to > serve

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Bump swiftclient to 3.1.0

2016-09-19 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:09:49PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > We do not generally bump minimum versions for dependencies for bug > > fixes, especially for only one project. Does this validation bug affect > > other projects? Is python-swiftclient

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing firehose.openstack.org

2016-09-19 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:50:31AM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I wanted to announce the addition of a new infra service we started running > recently, the firehose. Running at firehose.openstack.org the firehose is an > MQTT based unified message bus for infra services. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc]a chance to meet all TCs for Tricircle big-tent application in Barcelona summit?

2016-09-19 Thread joehuang
Hi, Shinobu, Maybe you missed the thread for discussion on the patches, how do you think about the proposal? You can reply in the old thread. And it should be a topic in the weekly meeting agenda. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang(joehuang) From: Vega Cai [luckyveg...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 September

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Default devstack deployment config

2016-09-19 Thread Eric K
Thanks, Anusha! I agree with keeping both options, just using single proc as default. Added a bug on it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/congress/+bug/1624172 From: Anusha Ramineni Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] stable/newton branches

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Lingxian Kong's message of 2016-09-20 09:20:42 +1200: > Hi, Doug, Mistral didn't have a stable/newton branch, did we miss something? There was an issue creating that branch that I thought I resolved by hand, but apparently not all of the fix was pushed. I've taken care of it so the

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE][kuryr] kuryr-lib

2016-09-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/19/2016 03:43 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > Hi, > > We recently made the first release (0.1.0) of kuryr-lib on which no > project depends except openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. Now, kuryr-lib by > itself is not more than a base library and its release is only to > serve kuryr-libnetwork

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][mistral] mistral Newton RC1 available

2016-09-19 Thread Lingxian Kong
Thanks Dougal for reporting that, we are working on the issue. Cheers, Lingxian Kong (Larry) On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 16 September 2016 at 00:06, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> The release

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] stable/newton branches

2016-09-19 Thread Lingxian Kong
Hi, Doug, Mistral didn't have a stable/newton branch, did we miss something? I already sent msg in release team irc channel, ask here again in case you didn't see that :-) Cheers, Lingxian Kong (Larry) On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > All of the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

2016-09-19 Thread Loo, Ruby
Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 12 Sep 2016 and 16 Sep 2016) - Ironic: 186 bugs (-69) + 215 wishlist items (+2). 1 new (-40), 145 in

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #91

2016-09-19 Thread Iury Gregory
Hi Puppeteers, If you have any topic to add for this week, please use the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20160920 See you tomorrow =) 2016-09-12 13:23 GMT-03:00 Emilien Macchi : > Hi, > > Tomorrow we'll have our weekly meeting: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
I think there's some mileage in some further work on adding local LVM, since things like striping/mirroring for performace can be done. We can prototype it and get the numbers before even thinking about merging though - as additions to an already fully featured driver. these seem more worthwhile a

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] [puppet] Preparing TripleO agenda for Barcelona - action needed

2016-09-19 Thread Emilien Macchi
(adding puppet tag for cross project session). Let's continue to prepare TripleO sessions. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-tripleo For reminder, we have 2 fishbowls and 4 working rooms. I looked at the topic proposals and I started to organize some sessions. Some actions from you are

[openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE][kuryr] kuryr-lib

2016-09-19 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi, We recently made the first release (0.1.0) of kuryr-lib on which no project depends except openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. Now, kuryr-lib by itself is not more than a base library and its release is only to serve kuryr-libnetwork and kuryr-kubernetes. Now we are in the process of releasing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Template Generator

2016-09-19 Thread Ben Nemec
On 09/09/2016 10:28 AM, Liz Blanchard wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ben Nemec > wrote: On 08/10/2016 11:05 AM, Liz Blanchard wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ben Nemec

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
I vote for option 2. Regards, Vikram Hosakote IRC: vhosakot From: Ryan Hallisey > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Monday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] summit cross-project session

2016-09-19 Thread Armando M.
On 18 September 2016 at 11:46, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I want to confirm whether or not we're going to have a nova/neutron > cross-project fishbowl session in Barcelona, I think we are. Since Thierry > has the draft slots out I wanted to start looking at what time is

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
I disagree. Oracle Linux is well implemented and very well maintained by Paul Bourke and many other fine folks from Oracle. CentOS is derived from RHEL (changing trademarks and marketing fluff, not code). Regards -steve From: Dave Walker Reply-To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
+1 for option #2 with same commentary as prior relating to fedora. Regards -steve On 9/19/16, 10:44 AM, "Jeffrey Zhang" wrote: Kolla core reviewer team, Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including * Ubuntu * CentOS * RHEL *

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
+1 for option 2, unless some good Fedora folk appear in Kolla to maintain it in the future. In that case, we can always undo a deprecation within a cycle. Note the deprecation policy states that we do not remove functionality for 1 cycle after having released it for stable deliverables. Even

[openstack-dev] [release][ptl] stable/newton branches

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
All of the cycle-with-milestone projects have tagged a first release candidate and had their stable/newton branches created. Most of the intermediary projects also have had their stable/newton branches created. If you have a project that has not yet had a branch created, and you are ready to

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
yup, +1 on deprecation On 19 September 2016 at 13:58, Ryan Hallisey wrote: > option 2 > > Thanks > -Ryan > > - Original Message - > From: "Mauricio Lima" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Ryan Hallisey
option 2 Thanks -Ryan - Original Message - From: "Mauricio Lima" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 2:21:51 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla]

Re: [openstack-dev] [band] OpenStack Summit - Barcelona - musicians please raise your hands

2016-09-19 Thread Amrith Kumar
Thanks Neil, sounds like we’ll have a couple of others (who’ve replied privately and not to the ML) bringing instruments as well. I have heard so far from: Three guitars One flute/sax Thanks, -amrith From: Neil Jerram [mailto:n...@tigera.io] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 2:36 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > + [sahara] because they are primary consumer of the BDD. > > John, > Thanks for the answer. My comments are inline. > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny, > http://blog.e0ne.info/ > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:41 PM, John

[openstack-dev] [release][searchlight] searchlight Newton RC1 available

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, The release candidate for searchlight for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/searchlight/searchlight-1.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] [band] OpenStack Summit - Barcelona - musicians please raise your hands

2016-09-19 Thread Neil Jerram
I will be happy to bring my clarinet. Neil On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:37 PM Colette Alexander < colettealexan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: > > So, would y'all musicians who plan to bring your gear to Barcelona > please start

Re: [openstack-dev] Singing in Barcelona

2016-09-19 Thread Neil Jerram
Being reminded by the band thread, I thought I should remind about this too... On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:56 PM Neil Jerram wrote: > I know it's crazy, but I've talked with a few people in Vancouver, Tokyo > and Austin about the idea of getting a singing group together during a

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Matt Borland Searchlight UI Core Nomination

2016-09-19 Thread Aulino, Rick
+1 for Matt being a core. Great job Matt! +1 for creating a new searchlight-ui core team that is more than the union of the Searchlight/Horizon core teams. -- Rick Aulino -Original Message- From: Tripp, Travis S Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:13 AM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
Option 2 2016-09-19 14:56 GMT-03:00 Christian Berendt : > Thanks for moving this forward. > > > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:40, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > > > 1. Kolla needs support fedora( if so, we need some guys to set up the > > gate and fix

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
Option 2 2016-09-19 14:55 GMT-03:00 Christian Berendt : > Thanks for moving this forward. > > > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:44, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > > > Please vote: > > > > 1. Kolla needs support Debian( if so, we need some guys to set up

[openstack-dev] [release][tripleo] tripleo Newton RC1 available

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, The release candidate for tripleo for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the RC1 source code tarballs at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/instack-undercloud/instack-undercloud-5.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Bump swiftclient to 3.1.0

2016-09-19 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Sep 19 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We do not generally bump minimum versions for dependencies for bug > fixes, especially for only one project. Does this validation bug affect > other projects? Is python-swiftclient 2.2.0 (the current minimum) > fundamentally broken for all projects? It

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Brian Haley
Congrats Ihar! -Brian On 09/17/2016 12:40 PM, Armando M. wrote: Hi folks, I would like to propose Ihar to become a member of the Neutron drivers team [1]. Ihar wide knowledge of the Neutron codebase, and his longstanding duties as stable core, downstream package whisperer, release and oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
+ [sahara] because they are primary consumer of the BDD. John, Thanks for the answer. My comments are inline. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:41 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Ivan

[openstack-dev] [release][designate] designate Newton RC1 available

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, The release candidate for designate for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/designate/designate-3.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin,

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Christian Berendt
Thanks for moving this forward. > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:44, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > Please vote: > > 1. Kolla needs support Debian( if so, we need some guys to set up the > gate and fix all the issues ASAP in O cycle) > 2. Kolla should deprecate Debian support +1 on

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Matt Borland Searchlight UI Core Nomination

2016-09-19 Thread McLellan, Steven
+1 - I'm fine with an additional group for ui cores. On 9/19/16, 12:13 PM, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: >Hello! > >I am nominating Matt Borland for Searchlight UI core. Matt has been >working on searchlight UI since we started it and he is the primary >author of the angular

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Christian Berendt
Thanks for moving this forward. > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:40, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > 1. Kolla needs support fedora( if so, we need some guys to set up the > gate and fix all the issues ASAP in O cycle) > 2. Kolla should deprecate fedora support +1 on option 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][LBaaS v2]Quota Update for LBaaS v2 Members

2016-09-19 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi Reedip, As you noted with the linked bug, we have noticed some inconsistencies in the neutron-lbaas quota implementation as we are working on implementing quotas native in the Octavia API. The neutron-lbaas code does support a quota for members, but as you have observed I don't see it in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Dave Walker
On 19 September 2016 at 18:40, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Kolla core reviewer team, > > Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including > > * Ubuntu > * CentOS > * RHEL > * Fedora > * Debian > * OracleLinux > > But only Ubuntu, CentOS, and OracleLinux are widely used

[openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
Kolla core reviewer team, Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including * Ubuntu * CentOS * RHEL * Fedora * Debian * OracleLinux But only Ubuntu, CentOS, and OracleLinux are widely used and we have robust gate to ensure the quality. For Debian, Kolla hasn't any test for it and nobody

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
Voting is open for 7 days until September 27st, 2016. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Kolla core reviewer team, > > Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including > > * Ubuntu > * CentOS > * RHEL > * Fedora > * Debian > * OracleLinux > > But

[openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
Kolla core reviewer team, Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including * Ubuntu * CentOS * RHEL * Fedora * Debian * OracleLinux But only Ubuntu, CentOS, and OracleLinux are widely used and we have robust gate to ensure the quality. For fedora, Kolla hasn't any test for it and nobody

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] let's talk (development) environment deployment tooling and workflows

2016-09-19 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Alex, Firstly, thanks for this detailed feedback - it's very helpful to have someone with a fresh perspective look at the day-1 experience for TripleO, and while some of what follows are "know issues", it's great to get some perspective on them, as well as ideas re how we might improve things.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] ListField in Horizon

2016-09-19 Thread Timur Sufiev
Hi, Janki What do you mean by ListField? A list of arbitrary tags? List of numbers? List of predefined values that you can choose from? Options may vary widely depending on your particular needs. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:32 PM Janki Chhatbar wrote: > Hi > > I am working

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] Matt Borland Searchlight UI Core Nomination

2016-09-19 Thread Tripp, Travis S
Hello!   I am nominating Matt Borland for Searchlight UI core. Matt has been working on searchlight UI since we started it and he is the primary author of the angular registration framework in Horizon which Searchlight depends upon. Matt has the second most searchlight UI commits in Newton [0],

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] ListField in Horizon

2016-09-19 Thread Janki Chhatbar
Hi Timur Thanks for your response. I need to input data like this: mapping = ['K1': 'v1', 'k2': 'v2'] If mapping: Check if v1 and v2 stored in server. Change to dictionary This is then passed on to the server as a dictionary. I have few questions: 1. I found about MultipleChoiceField.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Newton release, neutron-lib and decomposed projects

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Gary Kotton's message of 2016-09-18 05:16:54 +: > Hi, > At the moment I am a little confused and need some help please: > > 1. Will we be creating release candidates for Networking-l2gw, > Networking-sfc and Tap-as-a-service. These projects have tons of deprecation >

[openstack-dev] [user-committee][scientific-wg][api][UX] Results Presentation: Managing OpenStack Quotas within Production Environments

2016-09-19 Thread Danielle Mundle
(Apologies for cross-posting) The OpenStack UX team will be giving a presentation this Wednesday, 9/21 that summarizes results from a series of interviews intended to understand how operators manage quotas at scale as well as the pain points associated with that process. The study was conducted

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Useful tool for easier viewing of IRC logs online

2016-09-19 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Very nice, thanks! Only change I'll suggest is to allow it to be enabled by default :) Ramy From: Bashmakov, Alexander [mailto:alexander.bashma...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 2:26 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Bump swiftclient to 3.1.0

2016-09-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/19/2016 11:31 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've sent a request to bump swiftclient to 3.1.0 for Newton, and IIRC > this repository might be frozen so I'm sending this mail to bring > attention. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372618/ Is this an FFE for that? This would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] Project Navigator - Maturity Metrics

2016-09-19 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Shamail September 19, 2016 at 11:32 AM On Sep 19, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Gordon, Thanks for brining this to our attention. We pull data from many different sources for the Navigator. Most of the attributions for that

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Bump swiftclient to 3.1.0

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Julien Danjou's message of 2016-09-19 18:31:51 +0200: > Hi, > > I've sent a request to bump swiftclient to 3.1.0 for Newton, and IIRC > this repository might be frozen so I'm sending this mail to bring > attention. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372618/ > > Cheers, We do

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][congress][searchlight] projects in danger of being left out of newton

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Tim Hinrichs's message of 2016-09-19 15:46:47 +: > Congress tagged RC1 on Friday. Yep, we missed a manual step of the process and didn't record that. Sorry for the confusion. Doug > > Tim > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:52 AM Nikhil Komawar > wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] Project Navigator - Maturity Metrics

2016-09-19 Thread Shamail
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > > Gordon, > > Thanks for brining this to our attention. We pull data from many different > sources for the Navigator. Most of the attributions for that data can be > found under "Tag Details" or various "?" modal

[openstack-dev] [requirements] Bump swiftclient to 3.1.0

2016-09-19 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi, I've sent a request to bump swiftclient to 3.1.0 for Newton, and IIRC this repository might be frozen so I'm sending this mail to bring attention. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372618/ Cheers, -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */ signature.asc

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc]a chance to meet all TCs for Tricircle big-tent application in Barcelona summit?

2016-09-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:22 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, all TCs, > > Understand that you will be quite busy in Barcelona summit, all TCs will be > shown in the Barcelona summit, and meet together(usually, I assumed). So is > it possible to have a chance to meet all TCs

[openstack-dev] [Product] Project Navigator - Maturity Metrics

2016-09-19 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Gordon, Thanks for brining this to our attention. We pull data from many different sources for the Navigator. Most of the attributions for that data can be found under "Tag Details" or various "?" modal links on the page. For PTLs, we grab that data from the following:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
Congrats! Ihar. From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 9:41 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team Hi folks, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to theneutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Nate Johnston
I made the same assumption! Congrats Ihar! --N. On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:33:06PM +, John Davidge wrote: > Honestly, I had assumed Ihar was on the Drivers team already :) > > A great addition to the team, and much deserved! > > From: Paul Michali

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] API interactions meeting

2016-09-19 Thread Ildiko Vancsa
Hi All, This is a friendly reminder that the next meeting of our series is in less than 50 minutes, at 1700UTC on #openstack-meeting-cp. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Das, Anindita
Congratulations Ihar !! From: "Armando M." Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 11:40 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][congress][searchlight] projects in danger of being left out of newton

2016-09-19 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Congress tagged RC1 on Friday. Tim On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:52 AM Nikhil Komawar wrote: > I think searchlight went right ahead into 1.0.0 so, I doubt if we will > have rc1. (this is just initial info, I will defer the details to the > project lead). > > > > On 9/19/16

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing firehose.openstack.org

2016-09-19 Thread Thierry Carrez
Matthew Treinish wrote: > I wanted to announce the addition of a new infra service we started running > recently, the firehose. Running at firehose.openstack.org the firehose is an > MQTT based unified message bus for infra services. [...] Awesome work! Now I just need to find a good excuse to

[openstack-dev] [release][watcher] watcher Newton RC1 available

2016-09-19 Thread Antoine Cabot
Hello everyone, The release candidate for Watcher for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/watcher/python-watcher-0.30.0.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin,

[openstack-dev] [api] API Usability study at Barcelona Summit

2016-09-19 Thread Kruithof Jr, Pieter
Hi Folks, I was planning to run a usability study on behalf of the API working group at the Barcelona summit. The plan is to have operators complete a set of common tasks, such as adjusting quotas, using the projects APIs. Chris, Were you still able to act as my contact? I’ve created an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Barcelona Design Summit track layout

2016-09-19 Thread Thierry Carrez
Vitaly Gridnev wrote: > As we discussed during the last meeting, we agreed that 6wr + cm is > absolutely enough for sahara. So, we can release one working room for > other projects (for example Wed, 3:05 to 3:45) OK done! Thanks. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Barcelona Design Summit track layout

2016-09-19 Thread Thierry Carrez
Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Antoine Cabot > wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Thierry Carrez >> wrote: >>> Emilien Macchi wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Thierry Carrez

[openstack-dev] Announcing firehose.openstack.org

2016-09-19 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi Everyone, I wanted to announce the addition of a new infra service we started running recently, the firehose. Running at firehose.openstack.org the firehose is an MQTT based unified message bus for infra services. The concept behind is it that there are a lot of infra services many of which

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][congress][searchlight] projects in danger of being left out of newton

2016-09-19 Thread Nikhil Komawar
I think searchlight went right ahead into 1.0.0 so, I doubt if we will have rc1. (this is just initial info, I will defer the details to the project lead). On 9/19/16 9:55 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We have not had RC1 tags for congress or searchlight, and the project > leads aren't responding

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] *ExtraConfig, backwards compatibility & deprecation

2016-09-19 Thread Giulio Fidente
On 09/19/2016 01:25 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:32:07PM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 09/14/2016 05:59 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 09/14/2016 02:31 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: Related to this is the future of all of the per-role customization interfaces. I'm thinking

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Henry Fourie
+1 From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 9:41 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team Hi folks, I would like to propose Ihar to become a member of

[openstack-dev] [release][congress][searchlight] projects in danger of being left out of newton

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
We have not had RC1 tags for congress or searchlight, and the project leads aren't responding on IRC. These projects are at risk of being left out of the newton release. Someone from the core teams for these projects should get in touch with the release team as soon as possible to let us know your

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Branching of stable/newton

2016-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-09-18 16:08:04 +0200: > Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > Release team, > > > > At one point Doug had indicated all projects would automatically branch > > on tagging of rc1. I notice in git no Kolla stable/newton branch > > exists. Fwiw this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to the neutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Morales, Victor
This achievement reflects the constant effort you makes in OpenStack, kudos Ihar From: "Armando M." Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 11:40 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi team, > > We did some performance tests [1] for LVM and BDD drivers. All tests were > executed on real hardware with OpenStack Mitaka release. Unfortunately, we > didn't have enough time to execute all tests and

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]tempest test case for force detach volume

2016-09-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
Writing a sensible test for this api is rather tricky, since it is intended to clean up one very specific error condition, and has few guarantees about the state it leaves the system in. It is provided as a tool to allow the system administrator to clean up certain faults and situations without

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Should we discuss the use cases of force volume detach in the Tricircle

2016-09-19 Thread D'Angelo, Scott
Please keep in mind that Nova keeps some volume state in the BlockDeviceMapping table. Without changes to Nova, a force_detach function is not complete. I am interested in this use case, as are other Cinder developers. Please feel free to contact me in IRC with questions as "scottda". Scott

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to theneutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread John Davidge
Honestly, I had assumed Ihar was on the Drivers team already :) A great addition to the team, and much deserved! From: Paul Michali > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]tempest test case for force detach volume

2016-09-19 Thread D'Angelo, Scott
The cinder team would welcome submission of any missing Tempest test cases. I'm not certain of the history of the os-force_detach API, but you could write tests for them and they would be reviewed. Scott D'Angelo From: joehuang Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] Project Navigator - Maturity Metrics

2016-09-19 Thread gordon chung
is this updated with a script or manually? i just took a quick look at this and some of the projects have a different information between the high-level "all projects" view and the detailed individual project view. this was something that was brought up a months ago so i assume it hasn't been

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Barcelona Design Summit track layout

2016-09-19 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Antoine Cabot wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Thierry Carrez >>> wrote: 1. If you have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] *ExtraConfig, backwards compatibility & deprecation

2016-09-19 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:32:07PM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 09/14/2016 05:59 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > > On 09/14/2016 02:31 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > Related to this is the future of all of the per-role customization > > > interfaces. I'm thinking these don't really make sense to

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] resigning from Tempest core

2016-09-19 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi Marc, Thanks for your good work on Tempest all these years. I know you are still contributing to other areas of OpenStack so that's good for the project as a whole. Cheers, Jordan On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Koderer, Marc wrote: > Hi folks, > > as already mentioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-19 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Ruijing, In a nutshell, the guide would be 0) install vanilla Centos 7 1) install fuel-release package (it configures necessary yum repos) wget

[openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi team, We did some performance tests [1] for LVM and BDD drivers. All tests were executed on real hardware with OpenStack Mitaka release. Unfortunately, we didn't have enough time to execute all tests and compare results. We used Sahara/Hadoop cluster with TestDFSIO and others tests. All tests

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Is there a way to change plugin html dynamically?

2016-09-19 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
Hi Peter, there are two ways I see today to have done what you want to: First, you can change [0] and add some fields to store second netapp device. In this case you'll need to change puppet manifests logic to use new fields - according to current state, it's a bunch of code double or you'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

2016-09-19 Thread Daly, Louise M
Thanks Liping! Yes we are using the kuryr ipam driver in the PoC code, otherwise we have to manage the IP addresses manually. We chose IPVlan mostly due to the hardware limitation of the mac addresses on the NIC (i.e. No. of virtual devices created on a master exceeds the mac capacity and puts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to theneutron-drivers team

2016-09-19 Thread Paul Michali
Congratulations Ihar! Great addition to the Drivers team. On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:52 AM Vikram Choudhary < vikram.choudh...@huawei.com> wrote: > Congrats Ihar! > > > > *From:* reedip banerjee [mailto:reedi...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* 19 September 2016 14:08 > > > *To:* OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

2016-09-19 Thread Liping Mao (limao)
Thanks for your reply, your poc is cool, Louise! You already can use --ipam-driver=kuryr to use kuryr-ipam to do this in your poc code? BTW, any reason you choose ipvlan, but not macvlan. Regards, Liping Mao From: , Louise M > Reply-To:

[openstack-dev] [qa] resigning from Tempest core

2016-09-19 Thread Koderer, Marc
Hi folks, as already mentioned during the current code sprint: I am currently lacking time for reviews and code contributions. I think it better to step back and let other’s in that are more active. Thanks for all the support and it was really fun the past 3 years working with you! Regards

  1   2   >