John Graves jh.gra...@verizon.net writes:
PS my LunaPro still works...I will need a source
for the PX625a cells though.
I've been buying them from this guy:
http://stores.ebay.com/BATTERY-MART
-tih
--
I don't believe that souls or bodies can be changed by incantation.
On 1/18/2011 2:12 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
It is the sole responsibility of the submitting photographer to obtain
a written release
from any _recognizable_ [emphasis mine] person in a submitted photo.
Don't you have a rule/law in your country whereas if you take a picture
of a person in
On 17 January 2011 22:08, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2011/_IR25429.jpg
For a successful outcome, Kermit needs to work harder on his
technique. Four out of ten
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 11-01-18 12:27 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
It was our turn for some decorative snow this morning. It was -20C
with almost no wind, and about 6-8 of super light'n'fluffy stuff
fell. I got about 50 shots in the back yard, of which this was one of
the best ...
I'll try a little brightening, Tim. Funny thing was I was shooting Av
and had added +2.5 stops of exposure comp already just to push up the
histogram! Rule of thumb for snow seems to be +1 to +1.5. But more
white will likely look fine.
Thanks!
-bmw
On 11-01-18 1:04 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
Oh,
On 17/1/11, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, it's you move!
Har! I wish I could!
I've just been talking to satellite dish and equipment suppliers and for
what I need to do they're talking numbers that make my eyes bleed. C.
40,000 GBP. Trying to get my client to buy it.
--
On 17/1/11, Jens, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyone here using Portrait Professional?
This is software, that's affordable, easy to use and quite impressive,
actually.
I guess it's not Come il fout or PC these days. Nevertheless software
like this may be quite commonly used, although rarely
Hey John, you just made my day - well thought through and well put too.
I don't have FB acct either - no need nor desire.
On 1/14/2011 10:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Yeah, you're right. I'm not really anti-social media. I have Flickr
YouTube and this mailing list. PDML is social media as far
On 17/1/11, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was our turn for some decorative snow this morning. It was -20C with
almost no wind, and about 6-8 of super light'n'fluffy stuff fell. I got
about 50 shots in the back yard, of which this was one of the best ...
http://goo.gl/cLnNB
K20D,
On 1/13/2011 4:10 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
It's pretty much 24/7 social media now. Actually left me with a question
and some doubts.
Q: In this 24/7 assault on Facebook et al, when do you actually make
time to take photographs?
...
And then there's Facebook. That's a problem in itself.
I'd
On 17/1/11, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81-svcgissc
with the darkside SX120 PS - sorry.
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:33 -0500, Tom Cakalic caka...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12220273size=lg
Gee, that's good! To fully appreCheers
Brian
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australiaciate it, though, I suspect I need to
Don't think so.
If it is published, you need autorization IMO.
2011/1/18 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
On 1/18/2011 2:12 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
It is the sole responsibility of the submitting photographer to obtain
a written release
from any _recognizable_ [emphasis mine] person in a
2011/1/18 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
I've a pic in there that shows faces... No problems this far.
Hmmm... It's a bit like driving without a license. No problems as long
as there are no problems.
I have a pic in there too, of two boys from Old Jerusalem playing with
a toy gun; shooting
What you say makes sense, but there is a major problem with such an
approach, as I see it, personally.
Consider that you made a photo of yourself on backdrop of Trafalgar
square and you want to publish it in your blog basically just to boast
that you were there and how good you looked. Now,
As far as I know we don't have a rule or law -- other than the first amendment
to the Constitution. -- that says you can take pictures of people in public.
But we have court precedents. You don't need model releases for pictures or
people taken in public unless they're used for profit in a
On 1/18/2011 2:58 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2011/1/18 Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com:
I've a pic in there that shows faces... No problems this far.
Hmmm... It's a bit like driving without a license. No problems as long
as there are no problems.
Well, no, it is not, unless you say that if a pic
You definitely don't need a model release for a picture taken in public and
published in a gallery , a newspaper or a magazine. Thousands of legal
precedents have affirmed that. Even the NY Times, which is hyper cautious
doesn't require that. I shot dozens of people for them at the dream
On 18/1/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, if you were to sell this picture, then you would be really taking
chances
If this is the case, then every freelance newspaper photographer would
be guilty.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
2011/1/18 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Hmmm... It's a bit like driving without a license. No problems as long
as there are no problems.
Well, no, it is not, unless you say that if a pic of mine is shown somewhere
on the net, it introduces a terrorist threat personally to me.
Traffic
I'm not sure about Israeli law, But if the photo were taken in the U.S., you
would be fine. If the boys parents found out, they could ask you to remove it.
But they couldn't force you to take it down, nor could they take legal action.
There's no debate on that.
Paul
On Jan 18, 2011, at 7:58
I missed that. wow. Don't worry though. At some point plastic
surgery will become common and people will actually look like that.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 17/1/11, Jens, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyone here using Portrait Professional?
This is
Someone with way too much time on their hands!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1347834/Da-Vinci-masterpiece-The-Last-Supper-recreated-laundry-fluff.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
stan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
We are about 9kms from the nearest spot shown on those maps, which is
Milton. The closest flooding to us was probably in Herston/Bowen Hills, but
there aren't any pics of it in this collection. My husband works in Bowen
Hills at the hospital which was our main cause for concern as our car was
The first amendment is a well good rule/law for me... I mean not me
personally, as I am not US citizen, but hmmm, well you surely understand
what I mean.
So, effectively, sand the awkward language I was stating the right thing.
It has to be determined (as in lawyer sense of the word) what is
Gee, did not think of them. Sorry. I stand correct. Thanks, Cotty (the
old and wise /wink wink/)
On 1/18/2011 3:10 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 18/1/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, if you were to sell this picture, then you would be really taking
chances
If this is the case,
I don't know about Israeli law either. Perchance it is time I found out.
On 1/18/2011 3:11 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm not sure about Israeli law, But if the photo were taken in the U.S., you
would be fine. If the boys parents found out, they could ask you to remove it.
But they couldn't
On Jan 18, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
The first amendment is a well good rule/law for me... I mean not me
personally, as I am not US citizen, but hmmm, well you surely understand what
I mean.
So, effectively, sand the awkward language I was stating the right thing.
It has
Gang,
I had a first go at time-lapse photography this morning. It was great
fun, but I never got even close to feeling on top of the process...
:-)
Does anyone know any rules of thumb to use for time-lapse photography,
like relationships between relative movement of subject in the frame
vs.
Oh. Understood... Well, jolly good.
On 1/18/2011 3:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 18, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
The first amendment is a well good rule/law for me... I mean not me
personally, as I am not US citizen, but hmmm, well you surely
understand what I mean.
So,
On 11-01-18 6:48 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/1/11, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was our turn for some decorative snow this morning. It was -20C with
almost no wind, and about 6-8 of super light'n'fluffy stuff fell. I got
about 50 shots in the back yard, of which this was one of the
2011/1/18 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
I missed that. wow. Don't worry though. At some point plastic
surgery will become common and people will actually look like that.
yeah and that is where they got the idea for I am Legend
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Both are very good pictures, Stig. I especially like that with the power
lines. Been trying to hunt 'em down myself. So far they manage to elude me.
Boris
On 1/12/2011 7:44 PM, SV Hovland wrote:
Both taken with K-5 and DA18-135/3,5-5,6. I really like this lens ☺ It’s small,
sharp and have
On 11-01-17 3:33 PM, Tom Cakalic wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12220273size=lg
A very fine shot, Tom. One of the best I've seen recently. (Too bad
photo.net doesn't let me view it a little bigger.)
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/15/2011 11:19 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Where do, or have, you hung out online to discuss photography, and/or
pentax gear? What are the different ones like? How worthwhile are
these different fora, and to whom?
95% - PDML, 4% - PentaxForums, 1% - The Online Photographer. I left
Russian
I have an old toaster.
How many slices of toast would I have to do
before I produced a 'Holy Image'?
10^5, 10^6, 10^7,...
If I started now would I be finished before Xmas?
Could I get rich if I sold the toast on ebay?
How about the toaster?
The possibilities are endless!
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue,
On 11-01-10 11:34 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Not much, actually, but for a few minutes on the weekend, it looked
quite wintry:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/01/it-snowed-in-new-toronto.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
I love the old-time look of this shot,
Sasha,
I surely like the first image. That of a landscape. Very nice tonal
gradations and colors.
I am not certain about the last one where a person is walking down a
path. They are in the middle and although their direction of travel is
evident, it does not cause immediate response as it
Oh, and surely neglected to mention that we don't need our PESOs and
GESOs to suffer from inflation. Life is hard as it is, you know /grin/.
On 1/16/2011 8:09 AM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
I like this new camera:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5359087128/
Actually, I work for part of the New York Times and while the newspaper
itself doesn't use model releases all the time - magazines and online
properties owned by NYT that aren't news outlets MUST have model releases.
Even newspapers have been successfully sued when photos are released with
Brilliant, Godfrey!
On 1/12/2011 10:03 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Picture Every So Often 2011 rolling ... for the 11th year! I posted
#s 001 and 002 already, you can get there by walking backwards with
the older button in the lightbox.
Frank, the series is plain superb. You ought to make a book out of it,
Blurb perhaps?
On 1/16/2011 1:35 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I think this is my favourite of the week:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_13.html
Here's the week's worth:
How about:
Holy hit?!
Or
Holy hat?!
On 1/18/2011 2:24 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Oops, I indeed missed the second link:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2011/_IR25364.jpg
(he's got a halo)
Thank you, Ann!
Igor
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Roshchin
Hi
On 1/18/2011 12:08 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Shooting at the Lone Star Championships (lindy hop/blues/charleston/
dance event, http://www.lonestarchampionships.com/ ) last weekend
I took this shot:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2011/_IR25429.jpg
Dance move, sorta comes to my mind...
On 18/1/11, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone know any rules of thumb to use for time-lapse photography,
like relationships between relative movement of subject in the frame
vs. picture frequency, etc.?
The only thing I would say is that your TV system is PAL, which is 25
fps.
On 18/1/11, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
I missed that. wow. Don't worry though. At some point plastic
surgery will become common and people will actually look like that.
If I had a body like that I'd play with it every day :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 18/1/11, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
Try a test - it's too fast for sunbathers, slow it down, go for a frame
every 30 seconds
d'oh!!!
Of course to 'slow it down' you decrease the length of time between
shots, so 'slowing down' from 1 frame every 12 seconds would of course
be shooting
On 18/1/11, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
Other subjects with little movement (cityscape?) might be too slow, so
try a frame every 5 secs etc.
see addended post.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
You would slow the frame rate by increasing the time between frames..right?
Jack
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Subject: Re: How to estimate picture frequency for time-lapse series?
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, January 18,
I would MUCH rather have the (free) Rolleicord than the moola,
personally. Of course so would the people who want to purchase it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
We went through this a couple of weeks ago, with some people taking a
while to catch on to the make your own part.
: )
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
It's a keeper, all right.
On 1/16/2011 6:31 AM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Hmmm, well, let's say I'd allow you to choose your own superlative in
this case... /grin/ Well done, Christine!
On 1/16/2011 4:52 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
A sentimental favorite this week--oh, and the Domke F-803 is so far
working out great!
http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
:-) Cheers,
On 18/1/11, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
You would slow the frame rate by increasing the time between frames..right?
Correct - my bad in the first post.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Elizabeth Masoner wrote:
Actually, I work for part of the New York Times and while the newspaper
itself doesn't use model releases all the time - magazines and online
properties owned by NYT that aren't news outlets MUST have model releases.
I work for The New
On 18/1/11, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
You would slow the frame rate by increasing the time between frames..right?
ACK - even I'm suffering by being discombobulated.
If you want to slow the viewed material down, you DECREASE the time
interval between still frames at the shoot - eg
On 11-01-17 11:00 AM, Jens wrote:
Anyone here using Portrait Professional?
This is software, that's affordable, easy to use and quite impressive, actually.
I guess it's not Come il fout or PC these days. Nevertheless software like
this may be quite commonly used, although rarely spoken of :-)
On 18/1/11, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you want to slow the viewed material down, you DECREASE the time
interval between still frames at the shoot - eg slowing down going from
say 1 frame every 12 seconds to 1 frame every 6 seconds.
To speed up the finished viewed material, you go
$1200 was the retail price floated in the pleased by the response
article that was posted earlier, so it makes sense that this will be
the initial price point. I think a grand was floated before that. So
the public's (and blogosphere's) collective drooling has probably cost
prospective owners a
On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
You would slow the frame rate by increasing the time between frames..right?
Jack
Yes, but if there's through-frame motion involved, it will also make the
finished product look somewhat ragged, and at some point, it becomes more of a
slide
On 18/1/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, but if there's through-frame motion involved, it will also make the
finished product look somewhat ragged, and at some point, it becomes
more of a slide show than time lapse photography.
Ahh, you guys are talking about viewing rate? I
Now that is motivation for medical science. ;-)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 18/1/11, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
I missed that. wow. Don't worry though. At some point plastic
surgery will become common and people will actually look
Wow. Unusual and very nice.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11-01-18 6:48 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/1/11, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was our turn for some decorative snow this morning. It was -20C with
almost no wind, and about
I've always (for about 7 years) why no one seems interested in a top
mounted LCD screen. I know they have the articulated kind, but that's
just not the same as a box with a screen on the top.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I would MUCH rather have the
On 18/01/2011 9:09 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-01-17 11:00 AM, Jens wrote:
Anyone here using Portrait Professional?
This is software, that's affordable, easy to use and quite
impressive, actually.
I guess it's not Come il fout or PC these days. Nevertheless
software like this may be quite
On 1/18/2011 1:49 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:46 AM, John Graves wrote:
In the FWIW department, Leica bayonet caps go on any which way. It is not a
REQUIREMENT that the Leica name be oriented correctly.
But fellow Leicaphiles WILL notice.
A bit like the correct way to
On 1/18/2011 3:52 AM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
John Gravesjh.gra...@verizon.net writes:
PS my LunaPro still works...I will need a source
for the PX625a cells though.
I've been buying them from this guy:
http://stores.ebay.com/BATTERY-MART
-tih
Now that it's been decided that it's
Simile fails me.
On 1/18/2011 8:17 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Someone with way too much time on their hands!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1347834/Da-Vinci-masterpiece-The-Last-Supper-recreated-laundry-fluff.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
stan
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be
2011/1/18 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Consider that you made a photo of yourself on backdrop of Trafalgar square
and you want to publish it in your blog basically just to boast that you
were there and how good you looked. Now, if what you say applies, you
/cannot/ publish it, unless you
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:55 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
the following are all the blogs of posters on this list with feeds that i
noticed/could find; some of the sites didn't really have obvious default
feeds, so i found feeds of recent photos or some such; if you subscribe to
As I said, for the newspaper they don't require it but I guarantee you they
do for their non-newspaper properties. The web property you write for is
part of the newspaper property and falls under the news umbrella.
You were photographing a news story - news stories are entirely different
than
Not under American, law or for that matter most places that draw their
legal systems originally from the British.
On 1/18/2011 7:51 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Don't think so.
If it is published, you need autorization IMO.
2011/1/18 Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com:
On 1/18/2011 2:12 AM, Ann
Yep, this man owns a lens, let me use it and it caused this:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTISTsubSection=126685subSubSection=11681436language=EN
Frankly, Boris, aren't you ashamed of yourself ?
:) :)
Mmm love that bokeh :)
Remember where this was taken Boris?
Best Regards,
2011/1/18 Elizabeth Masoner lizmaso...@bellsouth.net:
There are some exceptions based on photos taken in public places and at
public events. However, these are poorly defined in the law and judges are
notoriously inconsistent on rulings. Most judges take the side of the
person photographed
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Legally, you don't need a written release to publish a photo in a gallery. That
being said I believe I only have one portrait in the gallery, and I have a
release for that.
The sticky wicket
On 18/01/2011 10:01 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Now that it's been decided that it's alright to have mercury in Light
Bulbs when will we get our mercury batteries back?
Yeah, that's pretty funny actually.
Ceiling Voice says:
Did you know that compact florescent light bulbs contain mercury and as
I've always related to the idea that most people leads lives of quiet
desperation. Not everyone has an avenue for personal expression so
things like this leak out. She should buy a camera ;-)
BTW, right before I sent this out I noticed that things in the line
above was written as thongs. Given
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always (for about 7 years) why no one seems interested in a top
mounted LCD screen. I know they have the articulated kind, but that's
just not the same as a box with a screen on the top.
That would be
Yeah. Unfortunately last figure stated for Germany was 89% end up in
household trash. Mercury doesn't react into something harmless in
waste incinerators and cannot be filtered, it goes straight into the
food chain. Politics. You have to wonder.
Ecke
2011/1/18 William Robb
A quote from Timothy Allen:
Put simply, the shorter the interval between each frame, the more
slowly the action will move in your film. Using the shadows and
clouds example again – clouds will almost definitely tend to move much
faster through the sky than a shadow cast by the sun will move
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice. I like the colors. (not to push anything, of course . . .)
Thanks, Steve, glad you enjoyed. This one really needed colour...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a few moments to meander through your recent photo blog
postings, frank, as I'd fallen behind following your PESOs.
Excellent work, all of them! Thanks for sharing!
Thanks, Godfrey!
cheers,.
frank
--
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always (for about 7 years) why no one seems interested in a top
mounted LCD screen. I know they have the articulated kind, but that's
just not the same as a box with a screen on the top.
This was one attraction
Now I found 2 Nikon Film Bodies 1 with 50mm lens. I haven't done any
research yet but is this company still in business? ;)
The Rolleicord is a work of art or at least a marvel of engineering.Too
pretty or complex for me to take pictures with. Plus I'm a digital slave
these days. And the Sec
On 1/18/2011 12:41 PM, Don Guthrie wrote:
Now I found 2 Nikon Film Bodies 1 with 50mm lens. I haven't done any
research yet but is this company still in business? ;)
The Rolleicord is a work of art or at least a marvel of
engineering.Too pretty or complex for me to take pictures with. Plus
On 18/1/11, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Tim Allen recommends to decrease shutter speeds
to introduce some blur between the frames, but I imagined that the
optimal shutter speed for a given speed of subject movement would vary
with focal length as well...
With video, the shutter is
I've been brushing up on my Photoshop skills in preparation for the
upcoming semester by creating some promotional posters for PDML books
of the past and the exhibit in Chicago from last year. These were
designed to be 16 x 20 size prints, but were obviously never produced.
Book promo:
2011/1/18 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
On 18/1/11, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Tim Allen recommends to decrease shutter speeds
to introduce some blur between the frames, but I imagined that the
optimal shutter speed for a given speed of subject movement would vary
with focal length as
On 2011-01-17 23:41 , David Mann wrote:
On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:52 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
I mean, what is Oracle Corporation's forte? Database management, right?
Yes, and they're very good at it. Usability, however, is not their strong
point.
not to mention that OpenOffice was just a
I'm back upright again!
Jack
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Subject: Re: How to estimate picture frequency for time-lapse series?
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 7:03 AM
On 18/1/11, Jack Davis,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:05:27AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
As far as I know we don't have a rule or law -- other than the first
amendment to the Constitution. -- that says you can take pictures of people
in public. But we have court precedents. You don't need model releases for
If you wish to slow the ACTION down yes..OKAY, got it! ;)
Jack
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Subject: Re: How to estimate picture frequency for time-lapse series?
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 7:07 AM
On
On 18/01/2011 10:46 AM, eckinator wrote:
Yeah. Unfortunately last figure stated for Germany was 89% end up in
household trash. Mercury doesn't react into something harmless in
waste incinerators and cannot be filtered, it goes straight into the
food chain. Politics. You have to wonder.
Ecke
I
Only at sea level.
Jack
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Subject: Re: How to estimate picture frequency for time-lapse series?
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 7:10 AM
On 18/1/11, Cotty, discombobulated,
On 18/01/2011 11:41 AM, Don Guthrie wrote:
Now I found 2 Nikon Film Bodies 1 with 50mm lens. I haven't done any
research yet but is this company still in business? ;)
Which Nikons?
And yes, they are part of the Canikon cartel.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 18/1/11, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Since time-lapse is kinda fast-forward replay, would you concur with
Tim Allen in reducing shutter speed?
If by that you mean creating a bit of blur I would say yes.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
I've been brushing up on my Photoshop skills in preparation for the
upcoming semester by creating some promotional posters for PDML books
of the past and the exhibit in Chicago from last year. These were
designed to be
I've been brushing up on my Photoshop skills in preparation for the
upcoming semester by creating some promotional posters for PDML books
of the past and the exhibit in Chicago from last year. These were
designed to be 16 x 20 size prints, but were obviously never produced.
Book promo:
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Oops, I indeed missed the second link:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2011/_IR25364.jpg
(he's got a halo)
Thank you, Ann!
Igor
So my caption for that one is...
Ive got this little wireand clip at the back of my neck that I push
up and down with a remote
mike wilson wrote:
On 17 January 2011 22:08, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2011/_IR25429.jpg
For a successful outcome, Kermit needs to work harder on his
technique. Four out of ten
I like that caption the best :-)
ann
--
PDML
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
