On 11:03 AM 2/6/2001 +1100, Les Grant wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 4 Feb 2001, at 22:26, Andrew Jenkins wrote:
I'd be interested to know if you find the same situation on your
system, ie, that it's more than just AvdSch.hlp.
I just tried the same experiment with the PCB editor - same
problem
On 02:06 PM 11/1/2001 -0500, Michael Reagan wrote:
At 07:27 PM 10/31/01 +0100, Peder K. Hellegaard wrote:
Hi everybody
I have been the reseller in Denmark for some now but recently I
received a
termination letter from Altium with only one month margin.
[...]
Obviously Altium has
On 04:59 PM 11/20/2001 -0800, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
according to Brian Livingston (Window Manager columnist from InfoWorld
who recommends against using XP) the hardware detection/protection is by
design very weak
he suggests that there will be hacks freely available shortly to defeat
this
On 09:13 PM 11/21/2001 +1000, Don Ingram wrote:
We vowed to stick with M$ to save having to deal with 'yet more different
software' but since our experience with dealing with Win2K server and M$'s
new direction in licensing we decided to have a look at Linux.
I think that readers may be confused
On 10:53 PM 12/3/2001 +0100, Christoph Brudy wrote:
Hello,
can somebody recommend a way to handle components that I want to appear
in the schematic, but are not mounted on the PCB (e.g. switches, lamps,
fuses ...).
For moderately complex system designs, I have generally created at least one
On 01:17 AM 1/26/2002 +1100, Graeme Zimmer wrote:
Hi,
I have run second P99SE processes all the time, same for P98 and
combinations of P98/P99SE/V2.8. Has never caused a crash yet, using either
NT4 or now W2K.
All our machines run Win2K with oodles of resources.
Running more than one
On 01:56 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many users will not want to have to convert all their libraries to include
3-D information
This is my point exactly. Some PCB designers have no interest in the 3D
world, so let's not create a proverbial white elephant inside of Protel.
Yes,
On 05:09 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr Lomax,
I don't believe that I missed your point at all, I just don't agree. There
is no such thing as a simple 3D model. If all you want is simple height,
you might want to follow Robi's advice and calculate the separations with a
pencil and
On 04:19 PM 2/8/2002 -0500, Michael Reagan wrote:
yea yea yea Acel was so damn good they went out of business. Dont get my
going slamming bit mapped crayola like Accel.
Well...not exactly. And obviously, the program had enough of a value that Protel
purchased the company, and appears to have,
On 09:25 AM 2/12/2002 -0500, Narinder Kumar wrote:
Is this 1986 or 1886.
I was using Protel Dos previous to Autotrax and Easytrax. In 1990 I
purchased Easytrax.
'86...a typo. Was that easytrax or Autotrax that you purchased? Easytrax was always,
TTBOMK, free.
aj
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Hey,
For those of you who, like me, were pleasantly surprised by Tony Karavidas's post on
the subject of NView, (and the long awaited dual-resolution feature) check with your
video card company for the latest drivers. NView is now available for download (at
least from Evga). Here, I assume
On 03:47 PM 2/20/2002 +1100, Ian Wilson wrote:
How do others interpret the following terms?
PCB (printed circuit board)
Printed circuit board, ie, FR4 or other base material(s), etched and/or plated with a
very thin layer of metal to form an electrical circuit. Specifically, one that has
On 01:40 PM 2/25/2002 -0500, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 10:00 AM 2/25/2002 +0100, Edi Im Hof wrote:
As far as I know, it's legally to downgrade. That means buy XP and install W2000.
Where does Mr. Im Hof get that idea? If Microsoft allows it in the XP license, yes,
of course it would be
Hi,
Just received an unsolicited advertisement (IMO spam) for PCB services from the
subj-title address. No reason, as I can see, expect for my inclusion into this group.
Curious, and concerned that another spammer is trying to use information gathered by
subscription into this group for
On 08:08 PM 3/22/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote:
That's a good question. I would bet Protel has something that reads DDBs and
puts all the files in a directory. Maybe someone there would like to chime
in???
As I remember from the early description of Phoenix's expected file storage systems,
On 09:08 PM 4/23/2002 -0400, Andrew Jenkins wrote like an idiot about plating:
I hate when I don't think...Too much coffee, too little sleep, and, well...I'll just
shut up now...
Skip the flames, I'm already flogging myself.
aj
I don't understand your comment. I didn't ask any questions
to have answered.
You said: ...Just what might have happened to you... Nothing happened to
me.
It was a clever attempt at a dig. See. Nyah...See?
aj1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message:
-Original Message-
From: Ben Uijtenhaak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 1.5 PCB Lib to Protel 99SE PCB Lib
Suresh,
I just managed to import an old AUTOTRAX library (last update
in 1994) into
an
-Original Message-
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
i had terrible problems with a generic geforce2 card using
the supplied
drivers with rats nest lines not disapearing when moving and
the 3d display
taking 3 mins to update on a simple board. However, after
-Original Message-
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
OK GREAT!
Can ANYBODY recommend a card that has dual screen capability
AND a PROPER OpenGL implemetation?
Exactly what does OpenGL have to do with proper performance of Protel?
aj
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
-Original Message-
From: Terry Creer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:32 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Autopan in PCB (99SE)
Hmmm, I think you had a bit more success than I, Tom. No go
unfortunately.
Strange, it didn't do it before on
-Original Message-
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 3D VIEW USING RADEON7000
Not at all. However, if Protel is using an aspect of OpenGL
that is not
common or often correctly
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Newberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:19 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: [PEDA] how to expend DIGEST mode
I switched my list prefs to DIGEST mode, but was annoyed to
discover that
the digest is a hierarchy of
-Original Message-
From: Brian Sherer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:03 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Protel / MSoft
My personal reservation to Altium's new pricing structure is that
both Microsoft and Protel have historically used a Toss
-Original Message-
From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I actually have been wondering for years where all the CPU
cycles go. Each
successive generation of software runs slower and slower...
irony meter on
Well, At the risk of upsetting our rich, oak-lined
On 11:30 AM 7/3/2002 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote:
On 10:27 AM 2/07/2002 -0400, Andrew Jenkins said:
Studies have shown time and time again that a pair of XMhz processors will
out-perform a single 1.5X processor in most real-world tasking environments.
Andrew,
Have you got references - I am
On 11:45 AM 7/5/2002 -0400, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
Buy this new cell phone - it has downloadable ring tunes and 3 new
interchangeable case colors! Woo hoo!
Buy this new car - it has state-of-the-art LED taillights and is all new for
this model year! Woo hoo!
Buy this new TV - it has 36
-Original Message-
From: Brian Sherer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Not quite.We provide a service, not manufacture a product. Our
clients set the target product functionality, and specify performance.
If the computer trade were based on a service model, I'm sure we'd
have much
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ingle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:53 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Fastest possible Protel system, price is not a
concern.
I would guess that your money on Protel would go the furthest
with a lower
cost
-Original Message-
From: Schmitt Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hey Folks ...
One uppon a time there was a Protel Eda Users Forum that was
a goof adress
for Protel related questions and answers where tip and tricks were
discussed.
Mr Schmitt would like to offer his wisdom,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
As far as the Zoom issue. It was obviously a design decision.
As such with user
interface decisions, some people will like it, and some
won't. If the majority
find the decision useable and can adapt to it in a
-Original Message-
From: Rene Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You're wrong. The NDA applies for afterwards too.
The NDA covers the NDA too, I guess.
The beta was a lot of tiring work, so let's forget about
the beta and focus on the release.
You do your
purchase
-Original Message-
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:59 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Re[2]: Not DXP or P99SE, but have you seen the
Cadence offer
Get ready to bend over for the maintenance fees on $26,000.
Hmmm,
-Original Message-
From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I don't think any of us can complain that Protel went the
extra mile and
offered SP5 and SP6 free.
Offered for free? How very nice. I feel really warm and fuzzy
IMO, offer for free, or any other tacitly
-Original Message-
From: Rene Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
AFAIR, 99SE was to first to have servicepacks.
2.8 was halfway working, the next year came 3.0.
The next year came 98, the next year came 99, then came
99SE and then the servicepacks. And I paid for every
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On 08:57 AM 1/08/2002 -0400, Andrew Jenkins said:
-Original Message-
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Get ready to bend over for the maintenance fees on $26,000.
Hmmm, send
-Original Message-
From: Danny Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
I wonder what conclusion we can draw from any potential
benefits of using a thick trace for a tricky trace, but
thinning it down when required to get through tight
spots?
I suppose that might depend on how one
-Original Message-
From: Frank Gilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 04:45 PM 8/15/2002 -0400, Matt Daggett wrote:
Also if anyone is thinking about installing Win2K SP3 better
real the EULA
very closely. I basically gives Bill the ability to
remotely install/remove
-Original Message-
From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
snippity-doo-dah
I use 1/5 of
the Protel tool
set but paid for all of itI don't want their
autorouter, their
PLD tools etc. So why should I have to pay for them? Most
likely, I will
have to pay
From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The guys who made this web site should convert their screen
shot .BMPs to .PNGs. I gave up after the first page in the
viewing of
their online manuals.
Looks really cheap...
At $195, that's an understatment...
aj
From: Mike Ingle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I purchased Auto-Trax from Protel along with The initial
windows schematic
software. Way back when they were in Santa Clara Ca.
Protel has always been an Aussie company, though they did have a
sales/support group here in the states.
aj
From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Wasn't AutoTrax the predecessor to Protel?
Yes. I was surprised to see that the name was being used. 'Suppose someone
will make issue. Didn't want to be the one. My understanding is that the
original code had been sold to a third party
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It's freeware for 15 or 30 days, right?
According to the author, it has no timebomb, therefore, it should not be
time-limited. I highly doubt that the authopr intends this product as
freeware, but instead I do get the feeling that he has
-Original Message-
From: Rob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Now that I know of the P L command, I went into the PCB
library editor to
create a component and the P L command does not exist!
There are no lines in the PCB editor. They're all polylines, or, in Protel
nomenclature,
Received same. now is deletia. AFAIK, the PEDA server filters out attachments, so it
must have been a direct attack.
Rick be warned, Your system appears to be infected.
aj
On 01:23 PM 11/29/2002 -0500, Phillip Stevens wrote:
---Phil
My e-mail program just quarantined an e-mail (It
On 05:32 PM 12/3/2002 -0800, JaMi Smith wrote:
AJ,
Not sure that anyone ever replied to this one.
Nope. Thanks for the reply. Yes, it would be nice if there was such a beast, but I
have a feeling that there isn't.
The reason I was interested is probably pretty obvious, but if not, it's simply
All,
When I grab an entity within the P99SE Schematic editor, specifically one such as a
wire or wire-end, I have a difficult time actually attaching my cursor to the entity,
unless I have magnified the local area to an often unacceptable zoom level.
For clarity's sake, suppose you have a
Not sure that formal instructions are really necessary. My own informal isntructions
might go something like this:
1. Bend leads just past neckdown to 90 degrees.
2. apply heatsink compound to screw tab (underside of TO-220)
3. Insert component.
4. Solder component.
5. Attach using screw/nut
John,
I did a quick check of the PEDA messages in my personal archive, and the only
reference I came up with indicates that you _may_ have inadvertently changed the port
type to ORCAD ports. Check and see if that is your problem. Other than that, I can't
really comment, as I've not seen the
Well, I'm not exactly sure, but I think I'm glad to have been of some help.
Makes a watchdog feel all warm and fuzzy...g
On 04:15 PM 12/15/2002 -0500, John Branthoover wrote:
I'm A Fool!!!,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/15/02 10:51 AM
...the only reference I came up with indicates that you _may_ have
On 04:22 PM 12/15/2002 -0500, John Branthoover wrote:
I'm A Fool!!!,
That was it. I thought that I had did a good look around for
something that was turned on that was not suppose to be. I guess that I
didn't. Thank you for setting me straight. Now mabe I can get some
work around here.
Ah...
Thanks for the explanation. Now that you mention it, I do remember something from a
thread or two on that very subject.
aj
On 10:41 PM 12/15/2002 +, Terry Harris wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:40:17 -0500, you wrote:
Just for curiosity's sake, do you know how OrCad ports got
On 09:24 AM 12/14/2002 -0800, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
what about the infamous runaway panning problem ?
is that finally nailed in DXP?
I would hold out on any evaluation of this particular feature until some time has
passed. As evidenced by the nearly half dozen previous attempts that Protel
It's at your end Jami. Probably a glitch in some new anti-viral scanner your MIS team
came up with. nada (no duplicates) here or at work.
On 12:25 PM 12/20/2002 -0800, JaMi Smith wrote:
Brad,
Thanks for the response.
It will be interesting to see if you get anything.
I have just received yet
On 11:01 AM 1/13/2003 -0600, Brad Velander wrote:
Andrew,
I was not advocating dumbing down
Chill, didn't mean any harm. Try this. It might be something of value...
http://support.intel.com/support/processors/tools/frequencyid/freqid.htm
r,
aj
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
