The problem is we're trying to use latest SVN checkouts and keep
updating it.
I'm using my own install scripts, just wraps a direct SVN checkout. I
tried eggs, but it installs RB to somewhere like
[/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_r1537-py2.5.egg/
reviewboard]
This path change
Hi,
I just got the same error after upgrading post-review. What I found out is
that the subprocess.stdout that is read for the diff command contains a
newline (\n) right after the second filename in the diff header. Kind of
weird...
No fix or explanation found yet.
Regards,
Florian
2008/10/16 J
Hi,
I use git internally and want to use RB to review code changes before
submitting to our repo.
We have a central repository which holds the main code. Developers
pull from this repo and work with their local checkouts. After hacking
their internal repos, when the code is in a consistent shape
Syntax highlighting should be on by default once you turn it on system-wide.
If not, we need to figure out a fix.
Are you using mod_python? What happens if you set it and then restart the
server? Does it stick?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Wed, Oct 15, 20
Hi,
I've got a question about how djblets.siteconfig handles changes in
the settings.py and settings_local.py files.
After upgrading to r1537 (and introducing djblets.siteconfig), as I
understand, a SiteConfiguration object has been created (and stored in
the db) that reflects the existing state
I was wondering what all the events that cause an email trigger. My
guess would be:
1.)When a review goes "live" (to everyone who is on the review)
2.)When a review gets closed ("set submitted")
3.)Anytime a review is published by any of the reviewers
4.)When a diff is updated
5.)More:?
(Can you
Getting error "ImportError at /r/new/ pysvn was built against newer
(svn, apr, etc.) libraries then the ones installed on this system. /
usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysvn/_pysvn_2_5.so: undefined symbol:
_ZN2Py19PythonExtensionBase12rich_compareERKNS_6ObjectEi" after adding
Repository.
Pl he
Can you show me the output of post-review --debug? (Be sure to strip out
sensitive info).
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After a decent amount of monkeying around this afternoon, I've
We'll look into a solution for this.
We know we need to be able to give users an alternate directory for media
installation, so that you can have multiple instances with their own
"uploaded" directories. This will at leas take that part out of the egg
directory.
I'm trying to figure out the best
Also, it'd be helpful to find out what we're actually seeing from the
Perforce server as soon as we attempt to fetch it.
If you turn on logging, do you see any "Fetch file ..." log statements? They
should show the patch and the revision.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware
In the diff viewer, for new files, only one version of the file is
show (because only 1 exists). I would like our code reviews to be more
about reviewing a file in a given state, not simply a diff. Is there
anyway to create your diff so that the diff viewer will only show a
single version of the f
It just hit me too, that you can just click the "expand changes" link in the
diff viewer header, there's nothing stopping you from reviewing parts that
didn't change, we do it all the time... just make sure to hit that link,
otherwise the comments that are in old sections won't be displayed
--Chri
There are two ways to do this:
1. if you manually diff your current file against a file that doesn't exist
(there may be a flag you need to set on your diff program), it will generate
a diff against a new file, then you just need to adjust the diff header to
make it right... we've got a simple scr
We send emails on 1, 3 and 4. There's an open bug about 2, but no
immediate ETA for fixing it.
-David
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:01 AM, fts1050 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was wondering what all the events that cause an email trigger. My
> guess would be:
>
> 1.)When a review goes "live" (to
Thanks for the response, any thoughts on why those emails only work
sometimes? Has anyone else had this issue besides me?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:37 PM, David Trowbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> We send emails on 1, 3 and 4. There's an open bug about 2, but no
> immediate ETA for fixing it
Thanks! I actually used revision range and it worked out well. It
thinks it's a new file which is exactly what I wanted. I suspect that
sometimes I will want to see the diff, but its nice to have the
flexibility to do both.
Thanks for the feedback!
On Oct 16, 1:22 pm, "Jeff Andros" <[EMAIL PROTE
Ok, strange. It works now, but I didn't do anything. (the box is not
under my control so a restart my have occurred without me having to do
it). However, in the admin interface, it still appears unset. Also,
for new profiles, I always have to set it manually (which I am not
sure if that is intenti
We saw some settings weirdness like that in a new installation. I'm trying
to figure it out, but I'm not sure yet.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:47 AM, fts1050 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, strange. It works now, but I didn't d
No worries. I'll keep my eyes peeled for updates, I'm sure you guys will get
a fix soon. By the way, I am really impressed with this tool. We evaluated
Crucible first and decided to pass as there were too many quirks and
annoyances for the price they were asking. Both your tool and theirs have
some
We've been running reviewboard now internally for 6 months or so now,
and I was going to create a new server for a much wider audience.
I made the mistake of trying to both upgrade to the latest version,
plus moving to a new machine.
I got the server set up rather easily (I thought) . I've been
You need to upgrade your perforce API on the server to 07.3 or 08.1
-David
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We've been running reviewboard now internally for 6 months or so now,
> and I was going to create a new server for a much wider audience.
>
> I made th
We are running out of an SVN checkout as well.
Maybe that is the reason my upgrade doesn't work - I was following the
instructions on the wiki to set up a new machine, and have been having
significant issues.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
If a user clicks Expand Changes, we remember that for future diffs. So,
users only need to ever do it once. There's no global setting for this, but
I suppose it could be added if someone wanted to write a patch.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Thu, Oct 16, 20
Thanks for the kind words :) It's really nice to hear feedback like this,
and certainly encourages us to continue working hard on the product.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Nancy Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> No worries.
They should work every time. I'm not sure why it would only be part of the
time. Do some operations work and others don't, or is it more sporadic than
that?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Nancy Bennett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
This is probably a small design flaw. We're populating these settings in the
SiteConfiguration entry in the database with whatever was in settings.py,
settings_local.py or Django's default settings file, but that gives users no
way to override in settings_local.py.
Since we are populating it, we'r
What distro is this? It sounds like you're just going to need a pysvn
compiled on that system against your current Python.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Getting error "ImportError at /r/new/
Hi.
First, Review Board doesn't ever submit code. We leave that up to the
developers, as there's just too many issues with Review Board handling this
across different repository types.
Second, the rest of that should work fine, with the exception that
post-review (the tool you'd want to use for u
I spent far too much time searching the discussions and source before
I realized that git was actually supported, but not in post-review. Is
there any reason that post-review doesn't support (non svn) git other
than that you haven't gotten to it yet? I'd like to add support. I was
able to upload a
No reason except we haven't gotten to it yet. We've been quite busy with the
VMware Workstation 6.5 release for the past year or so and trying to juggle
Review Board fixes and the 1.0 release in the meantime. It's been hard to
get to a lot of things.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROT
Actually i am new to reviewboard installation.I followed up the
documentation provided by reviewboard.
Below are the steps i have installed reviewboard.
1.First i installed python2.5.1 in my linux pc
2.Installed Django1.0
3.Then i installed PIL and Patchutils
4.Then i installed pysvn and build it.
31 matches
Mail list logo
