Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Larry wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Snip . . .
.
However all posts to the newsgroup are automatically forwarded/mirrored
to the mailing list and supposedly Google groups.
Snipped . . .
None of my occasional newsgroup posts have bounced. Shouldn't they, if
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Someone in Cuba, dainierlt (??), is subscribed to the SeaMonkey mailing
list ???
Seems to me if that were true, and be the cause of the bounce, wouldn't
all of us receive the bounces then?
I dunno. It's a puzzlement.
(Thanks for snipping the crosspost.)
--
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Someone in Cuba, dainierlt (??), is subscribed to the SeaMonkey mailing
list ???
Seems to me if that were true, and be the cause of the bounce, wouldn't
all of us receive the bounces then?
I dunno. It's a puzzlement.
(Thanks for
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Someone in Cuba, dainierlt (??), is subscribed to the SeaMonkey mailing
list ???
Seems to me if that were true, and be the cause of the bounce, wouldn't
all of us receive the bounces then?
I dunno. It's a
This is both a test to see if the spurious bounces problem has been repaired
and to ask this naive question about mozilla.test:
Has mozilla.test now become a general discussion, and blow off steam
newsgroup?
Just look at the last several days worth of postings there.
--
Rostyk
I took 1 st a href=http://goodfinance-blog.com;loans/a when I was 32 and
this aided my family very much. However, I need the sba loan also.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 10/26/2011 02:25 PM, HammondRosa22 wrote:
spam
http://www.projecthoneypot.org/ip_91.212.226.143
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
___
support-seamonkey
NoOp:
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
Yesterday i have set up a filter for this. Works. :)
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027.png (18 KB)
Hartmut
On 10/26/2011 04:39 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
Yesterday i have set up a filter for this. Works. :)
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027.png (18
NoOp:
I filter using the entire server (news.mozilla.org) for 91.212.226.
and that does indeed work.
I am using this rule:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027-b.png (16 KB)
Time will tell if modifications are needed. For a very long time i have
not used Filter Log and now observed,
On 10/26/2011 05:17 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
I filter using the entire server (news.mozilla.org) for 91.212.226.
and that does indeed work.
I am using this rule:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027-b.png (16 KB)
You'd be better served by filtering on:
UserIpAddress:
NoOp:
On 10/26/2011 05:17 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
For a very long time i have not used Filter Log and now observed,
that this log will only be updated after a restart of SM. Bug.
The log should be constantly updated, regardless of restart.
So it should be, but is not. I have asked for
On 11-10-26 7:03 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/26/2011 02:25 PM, HammondRosa22 wrote:
spam
http://www.projecthoneypot.org/ip_91.212.226.143
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
I can remove them after the
Dear km
km wrote:
... if i'm not mistakwn there is a seamonkey installation folder on my puter.
can i compress this folder and mail it to my friend and she could
unzip it and thus have a seamonkey with my settings on her puter???
is this possible???
You've asked this and similar questions
be in a far better position to help both you and him/her.
Philip Taylor
i HAD the impression that the question was more about sharing
than about installation. For example, to share usenet groups.
ASSUMING valid installations on both machines, I think the
subdirectory to share is i9s6998x.default
... if i'm not mistakwn there is a seamonkey installation folder on my
puter.
can i compress this folder and mail it to my friend and she could
unzip it and thus have a seamonkey with my settings on her puter???
is this possible???
km
--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible.
km wrote:
... if i'm not mistakwn there is a seamonkey installation folder on my
puter.
can i compress this folder and mail it to my friend and she could
unzip it and thus have a seamonkey with my settings on her puter???
is this possible???
km
This question was asked and answered elsewhere
if you dowvload sm and click on it to install
a series of menus appear. with yes/mo questions. if
you just press what does it do?
km
--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.
km wrote:
if you dowvload sm and click on it to install
a series of menus appear. with yes/mo questions. if
you just press what does it do?
...Installs SeaMonkey.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
I recently had an encounter with my virus scan on my Windows XP Pro SP3
computer. That problem has been resolved. I, however, lost all of
Bookmarks as a result of getting to where I am today. After some
searching, I found something that I don't remember seeing
before--Bookmark Backups.
Can anyone inform me on the version of Seamonkey that has the same
spell-checking code as FF 6 and TB 6 ?
The changed behaviour of the hyphen is essential for releasing a newer,
better Dutch spell checker for Seamonkey.
Thanks
___
support-seamonkey
WLS wrote:
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
My votes for Linux :)
Let people to use the OS they want/prefer !
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
My votes for Linux :)
Let people to use the OS they want/prefer !
I do let
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
My votes for Linux :)
Let people to use the OS
Keith Whaley wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
My votes for Linux :)
Let
Keith Whaley wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
WLS wrote:
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
My votes for Linux :)
Let
error message. So I installed Adobe Reader X, which restored my
ability to view PDFs within Seamonkey.
My question is how to reliably access to the Reader X toolbar. It
no longer appears by default when I open a PDF file. Sometimes I
can make it appear by clicking an Adobe icon that appears when
What shows about:addons for Adobe?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
chokito wrote:
What shows about:addons for Adobe?
about:plugins is a better option
--
SeaMonkey 2.3.2 (or as I call it 1.0.73) on openSUSE 11.3 Linux
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
WLS wrote:
chokito wrote:
What shows about:addons for Adobe?
about:plugins is a better option
Nothing Acrobat-related shows up in about:addons
About:plugins shows both my full Adobe Acrobat 9.4 and my new Reader X
installation.
___
BIll Spikowski wrote:
WLS wrote:
chokito wrote:
What shows about:addons for Adobe?
about:plugins is a better option
Nothing Acrobat-related shows up in about:addons
About:plugins shows both my full Adobe Acrobat 9.4 and my new Reader X
installation.
Try downloading PdfBrowser Plugin
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
BIll Spikowski wrote:
I think I have this solved -- I uninstalled Reader X altogether.
Now PDFs open in a browser tab with a useful toolbar (which
apparently is a part of Acrobat 9.4).
Thanks for all the help and suggestions!
Yes, I had a similar experience a few years back with earlier
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
Nope. Don't want to be learning a new system.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break
JeffM wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .
...or perhaps to Linux.
My votes for Linux :)
--
SeaMonkey 2.3.2 (or as I call it 1.0.73) on openSUSE 11.3 Linux
to view PDFs within
Seamonkey.
My question is how to reliably access to the Reader X toolbar. It no longer
appears by default when I open a PDF file. Sometimes I can make it appear by
clicking an Adobe icon that appears when I mouse-over a spot in the bottom of
the window, but other times it won't
restored my ability to view PDFs within
Seamonkey.
My question is how to reliably access to the Reader X toolbar. It no longer
appears by default when I open a PDF file. Sometimes I can make it appear by
clicking an Adobe icon that appears when I mouse-over a spot in the bottom of
the window
restored my ability to
view PDFs within Seamonkey.
My question is how to reliably access to the Reader X toolbar. It no
longer appears by default when I open a PDF file. Sometimes I can
make it appear by clicking an Adobe icon that appears when I
mouse-over a spot in the bottom of the window
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 31/08/2011 13:32, Walter told the world:
ME, too. I am running 2.0.14 because of all the negative comments of the
versions after that. I am running HP desktop, 6gb memory 750gb hard
drive, Windows 7. I know there has been a great
unfortunately is not now
working do to water damage from Hurricane Irene. Not sure when I will be
able to answer your question.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
unfortunately is not now
working do to water damage from Hurricane Irene. Not sure when I will be
able to answer your question.
Sorry to hear you got hit, Arnie.
Don't know your location, Arnie, but what was a hurricane doing up
around New York City in any case? Should be more in Jay's region
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 31/08/2011 13:32, Walter told the world:
ME, too. I am running 2.0.14 because of all the negative comments of the
versions after that. I am running HP desktop, 6gb memory 750gb hard
drive, Windows 7. I know there has been a great deal of be sure to do
Michael Gordon wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
I'm on a 64bit WIN 7 Ultimate system.
I just downloaded the SM 2.3.1 program binary from
www.seamonky-project.org and ran the installer exe.
(after a full backup of the profile and program folders)
The installer ran in a flash, and now I'm
Walter wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
I'm on a 64bit WIN 7 Ultimate system.
I just downloaded the SM 2.3.1 program binary from
www.seamonky-project.org and ran the installer exe.
(after a full backup of the profile and program folders)
The installer ran in a flash, and
Interviewed by CNN on 31/08/2011 13:32, Walter told the world:
ME, too. I am running 2.0.14 because of all the negative comments of the
versions after that. I am running HP desktop, 6gb memory 750gb hard
drive, Windows 7. I know there has been a great deal of be sure to do
this/that before
I'm on a 64bit WIN 7 Ultimate system.
I just downloaded the SM 2.3.1 program binary from
www.seamonky-project.org and ran the installer exe.
(after a full backup of the profile and program folders)
The installer ran in a flash, and now I'm supposedly
at SM 2.3.1
But I'm curious and just a bit
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
I'm on a 64bit WIN 7 Ultimate system.
I just downloaded the SM 2.3.1 program binary from
www.seamonky-project.org and ran the installer exe.
(after a full backup of the profile and program folders)
The installer ran in a flash, and now I'm supposedly
at SM 2.3.1
But I'm
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
I'm on a 64bit WIN 7 Ultimate system.
I just downloaded the SM 2.3.1 program binary from
www.seamonky-project.org and ran the installer exe.
(after a full backup of the profile and program folders)
Sounds like a good idea (backup), but should not have been necessary
to this thing called about:config. While
there, I observed 39 individual lines starting with the following:
print.printer_hp_deskjet_5550_series.print_...etc
Now my question: Should I remove these entries? If so, how do I make
this happen?
Windows XP Pro SP3//SeaMonkey 2.3
to this thing called about:config. While
there, I observed 39 individual lines starting with the following:
print.printer_hp_deskjet_5550_series.print_...etc
Now my question: Should I remove these entries? If so, how do I make
this happen?
Windows XP Pro SP3//SeaMonkey 2.3
My suggestion
Daniel wrote:
GrantH wrote:
I'm using the latest of both, but there are a number of things I
prefer on FF to how SM's browser works. I've not been able to find
(or possibly recognize) either an internal setting in SM to set FF as
my browser of choice (it *is* set as my default within FF, and I
GrantH wrote:
I'm using the latest of both, but there are a number of things I
prefer on FF to how SM's browser works. I've not been able to find
(or possibly recognize) either an internal setting in SM to set FF as
my browser of choice (it *is* set as my default within FF, and I have
*not* set
FF Preferences Advanced System settings...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
chokito wrote:
FF Preferences Advanced System settings...
Do I have to restart each application?
Just set FF as Default browser in Fx Preferences Advanced System
Defaults and links in SeaMonkey mail still open with the SeaMonkey browser.
___
chokito wrote:
FF Preferences Advanced System settings...
I think that the problem in inside SM who still start the SM browser
when double-clicking a link in an SM mail. You may change what you want
in FF, if SM still want to start SM browser he will do it anyway.
I'm using the latest of both, but there are a number of things I
prefer on FF to how SM's browser works. I've not been able to find
(or possibly recognize) either an internal setting in SM to set FF as
my browser of choice (it *is* set as my default within FF, and I have
*not* set SM as my
You must set the FF as default in FF preferences.
Edit Preferences Mail Newsgroups
You can then select Mail, News and Feeds as default application(s)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
chokito wrote:
You must set the FF as default in FF preferences.
Edit Preferences Mail Newsgroups
You can then select Mail, News and Feeds as default application(s)
He did not ask SM to be the default for Mail News and Feeds ...
He will just have FF as the default browser...
I think that
Interviewed by CNN on 18/07/2011 02:07, Bill Davidsen told the world:
From my view, in every release there are new features, improvements and
bugfixes haven't come to my attention. I like a model where eventually you
release something fully functional.
I'm not entirely clear on the meaning
to debate the validity of the Mozilla foundation or the Seamonkey team's
decisions. I mearly asked for clarification of a question and got great
answers from three users. So lets try not to drag this thread down into
a Seamonkey bashing thread.
-Hawker
Thanx for everyone's answers. That was very helpful.
Hawker
On 7/15/2011 12:47 PM, The digits of Jens Hatlak's hands composed the
following:
hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon?
There will be one but I cannot tell when.
I'm wondering
hundreds of messages serious
enough to be fixed than by the fact that there is not QA, after years of working
things becoming broken I assume user testing of beta versions is the only
testing there is.
As for your more specific question, why is it 2.2 instead of 2.1.1.?
Well, yes, the Seamonkey
Hey all, two questions.
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon? I'm wondering if I should install it or if I should wait for
2.2.1. I usually skip a X.0.0 release so I don't get the bad bugs (did
not do 2.0 until 2.0.4 I think).
2) I'm just curious
calls a chemspill release (and Seamonkey calls an oilspill)
-- a fix for a bug so serious it CANNOT wait for the next cycle. But
those are special cases, not to be considered in the normal release
schedule.
As for your more specific question, why is it 2.2 instead of 2.1.1.?
Well, yes
On 7/15/2011 9:41 AM, hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon? I'm wondering if I should install it or if I should wait for
2.2.1. I usually skip a X.0.0 release so I don't get the bad bugs (did
not do 2.0 until 2.0.4 I think).
There will be
hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon?
There will be one but I cannot tell when.
I'm wondering if I should install it or if I should wait for
2.2.1. I usually skip a X.0.0 release so I don't get the bad bugs (did
not do 2.0 until 2.0.4 I
Has anyone installed the FireFTP add-on from the link at:
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#fireftp ?
Hacked version 1.0.7 is listed as being compatible with
SM 2.0 and above and seems to install normally, but the
pull-down menu for adding accounts does not 'pull-down'.
--
Ed
W3BNR wrote:
Has anyone installed the FireFTP add-on from the link at:
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#fireftp ?
Hacked version 1.0.7 is listed as being compatible with
SM 2.0 and above and seems to install normally, but the
pull-down menu for adding accounts does not 'pull-down'.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/12/11 9:27 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:39 -0500, /cmcadams/:
* [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark
Manager.
* [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search
results within Bookmark
cmcadams wrote:
* [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark Manager.
As already said in this thread, the properties editing functionality
have been integrated into the main screen (lower part, collapsed by
default).
* [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from
cmcadams wrote:
Pre-2.1 SMs had a feature where you could specify a target folder for bookmarks
when
using the (Bookmarks - Bookmark this Page) pick list from SM's main screen.
Now such
bookmarks all seem to go to the end of Bookmarks Menu. Am I missing a setting,
somewhere?
I miss this
J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Pre-2.1 SMs had a feature where you could specify a target folder for
bookmarks when
using the (Bookmarks - Bookmark this Page) pick list from SM's main screen.
Now such
bookmarks all seem to go to the end of Bookmarks Menu. Am I missing a setting,
Been using 2.1 for several days and, all in all, looking good.
A couple of observations about bookmarks:
* [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark Manager.
* [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search results within
Bookmark Manager.
It would be
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:39 -0500, /cmcadams/:
* [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark
Manager.
* [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search
results within Bookmark Manager.
The bookmark properties are directly visible and editable in the
Bookmarks
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:39 -0500, /cmcadams/:
* [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark
Manager.
* [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search
results within Bookmark Manager.
The bookmark properties are directly visible and
On 6/12/11 9:27 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:39 -0500, /cmcadams/:
* [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark
Manager.
* [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search
results within Bookmark Manager.
The
emails since the backup were, of course, lost but we can retrieve
them if we need to. I have no idea what corrupted the profile. Since 2.1
is coming out next week I don't think I'll try to file a Bugzilla
report. My question is was the action I took the best way to recover
from the problem
the backup were, of course, lost but we can retrieve
them if we need to. I have no idea what corrupted the profile. Since 2.1
is coming out next week I don't think I'll try to file a Bugzilla
report. My question is was the action I took the best way to recover
from the problem or was there some other
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is SM 1.1.18, XP
or ? Maybe someone can direct me to the correct area. I am asking here
since I
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is SM 1.1.18, XP
or ? Maybe someone can direct me to the correct area. I am asking
cyberzen wrote:
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is SM 1.1.18, XP
or ? Maybe someone can direct me to the correct
Michael Gordon wrote:
cyberzen wrote:
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is SM 1.1.18, XP
or ? Maybe someone can
Michael Gordon wrote:
cyberzen wrote:
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is SM 1.1.18, XP
or ? Maybe someone can
On 04/28/2011 12:32 PM, Norvin wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
cyberzen wrote:
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is
Norvin a écrit :
Michael Gordon wrote:
cyberzen wrote:
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not sure if it is SM 1.1.18, XP
or ?
NoOp wrote:
On 04/28/2011 12:32 PM, Norvin wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
cyberzen wrote:
Norvin a écrit :
Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am
watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all
I get is a white screen and the sound. Not
a public reply when the original sender specified a private
Reply-To: address, or if he wants to force a private reply to a public
message.
In our OP's case, we have:
From: Mike li...@phivegills.com
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: General list question on replies
that if he wants to
force a public reply when the original sender specified a private
Reply-To: address, or if he wants to force a private reply to a public
message.
In our OP's case, we have:
From: Mike li...@phivegills.com
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: General list question on replies
, or if he wants to force a private reply to a public
message.
In our OP's case, we have:
From: Mike li...@phivegills.com
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: General list question on replies
There is no Reply-To: entry. Clearly, the OP did not specify one, and
neither did the list server. So
Mike wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
...
Alternatively, he can use SM's built-in newsgroup reader by subscribing
to mozilla.support.seamonkey on the server news.mozilla.org. This will
automatically direct all replies to the newsgroup with no effort at all
on his part. Additionally, he won't
When I reply to a message from the list, it only goes to the sender and
not the list. If I only want to reply to the list, do I need to
reply-all, manually remove the sender's email and then send? Or is there
a setting on the list page that I can set to achieve this? I've read
them but nothing
Mike wrote:
When I reply to a message from the list, it only goes to the sender and
not the list. If I only want to reply to the list, do I need to
reply-all, manually remove the sender's email and then send? Or is there
a setting on the list page that I can set to achieve this? I've read
them
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:51:57 -0700, /Michael Gordon/:
Mike wrote:
When I reply to a message from the list, it only goes to the
sender and not the list. If I only want to reply to the list, do
I need to reply-all, manually remove the sender's email and then
send? Or is there a setting on the
DoctorBill a écrit :
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally remembered today to ask here if SM 1.1
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally remembered today to ask here if SM 1.1 and/or SM 2.0 has such
a
On 4/15/11 5:09 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally remembered today to
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/15/11 5:09 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally
All:
Some PDF attachments open while others don't. If I save the PDF
attachments that don't open as a file in say /tmp and mail them to myself,
the will open just fine.
If I view the message source, I see:
--_=_NextPart_001_01CBF3F4.4C3AC9EB
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
Leslie Hartman wrote:
All:
Some PDF attachments open while others don't. If I save the PDF
attachments that don't open as a file in say /tmp and mail them to myself,
the will open just fine.
Have you tried the ViewSourceWith extension?
http://dafizilla.sourceforge.net/viewsourcewith/
--
Dave:
No I hadn't tried that, didn't know
that it existed.
Installed it today and gave it a try and
it worked.
The question is why doesn't it work? It seems
to work fine on the MAC's but not on the Linux workstation's.
At least not on Fedora 12 and Redhat EL5.5. Have
701 - 800 of 1165 matches
Mail list logo
