Michał Borsuk schrieb:
Without getting too much into the linguistic issues, I'd support the
Swedish railway=historic_path for anything further than stillgelegt
(English abandoned?), that is either with track, or without, but not
yet turned into a bike path (or anything similar).
But let's
On 31 July 2010 10:06, Heiko Jacobs heiko.jac...@gmx.de wrote:
Michał Borsuk schrieb:
Without getting too much into the linguistic issues, I'd support the
Swedish railway=historic_path for anything further than stillgelegt
(English abandoned?), that is either with track, or without, but not
I would love to see GTFS data imported into OSM, especially the SF data if
you can convince them to change the license.
I think the street= tag is a good idea.
I'm unsure of the bearing tag. If we know which street the stop is on and
where the stop is the direction the bus is going follows from
On 31 July 2010 14:19, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Saturday 31 July 2010 10:06:23 Heiko Jacobs wrote:
It seems, that no one else will comment here?
I think you don't get much comment because most mappers are too busy with
mapping stuff that is still there.
If we don't have some
Michał Borsuk schrieb:
I agree with your arguments. Then former?
former is a little bit non-specific.
A disused or abandoned railway may also be called former
Disappeared cannot be used, because it implies that the railway just
rolled itself and went home for Feierabend. Or a UFO took it one
On 31 July 2010 15:13, Heiko Jacobs heiko.jac...@gmx.de wrote:
Michał Borsuk schrieb:
I agree with your arguments. Then former?
former is a little bit non-specific.
A disused or abandoned railway may also be called former
It's already called disused or abandoned.
I don't like
Cartinus schrieb:
I'm interested in railways too, so I find that interesting. Railways are
relative sparse, so it won't clutter the map much.
... and with the suitable tag it won't clutter the rendered slippy map
I don't like gaps. ;-)
A former railway between Ittersbach and Pforzheim I could
On 31 July 2010 16:18, Heiko Jacobs heiko.jac...@gmx.de wrote:
A former railway between Ittersbach and Pforzheim I could map
90% because there are enough traces (gravel, embankments, cuttings,
bridges, ...) but 10% are levveled for farmland or residential
ares including buildings. But the
Michał Borsuk schrieb:
May I ask why bother? OSM is not a historic map, am I right?. What use
do I have of the information that once here there was a railway when
there are no traces, nothing to be found, nothing to be feared?
There are a lot of things inside OSM that for my opinion are
On Saturday 31 July 2010 20:58:59 Heiko Jacobs wrote:
Heiko Jacobs schrieb:
...
Sometimes the traces of a railway are very virtual:
...
Sometimes no trace exist anymore
...
For this I'm searching a word ...
If you don't map it, then you don't need the word - that is why you
On 29.07.2010 09:00, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:43:28 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Ljudi s OSM liste pitaju gdje je OSM atttibucija? Što da im odgovorim?
Samo nađi nekoga s laserskim printerom, otprintajte na naljepnicu OSM
atribuciju, izrežeš i naljepiš. Gotovo za 10
1. The help newbie is a link to the (translated) Beginners guide.
2. I have put the potential sources on a separate page.
3. A lot of municipals have a broke link, what do i do with that?
Op 30-jul-2010, om 17:49 heeft Ben Laenen het volgende geschreven:
Ivo De Broeck wrote:
Hi,
I am a
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:27:43 John F. Eldredge wrote:
I have to admit that I am bad about not bothering to enter a comment,
particularly if all I have been doing is fixing the alignment of streets to
better conform to the Yahoo aerial view.
snip
Don't forget, the Yahoo! aerials might not be
James Livingston lists at sunsetutopia.com writes:
For casual editing, I'm not sure what I could put in that would be useful.
Often
I start off adding some street numbers I've collected, and then trace those
houses from nearmap, and then start tracing a creek, and then start doing
something when
Both the police and ambulance service spend a lot of their time on
non-emergency items as do hospitals, doctors, etc. If you want to write an
app that lists the police under an emergencies menu/button then go ahead
but you don't need to change the OSM data to do it.
Kevin
On 30 July 2010
Am 30.07.2010 13:18, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
To them, I say: Yes, you're right, it can be a pain sometimes, but if
you practice it for a while, it will be an easy routine.
I'm doing this day by day while doing software development - but there
it has a much higher value: Very often you can't
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 12:55:28 pm Ed Avis wrote:
For casual editing, I'm not sure what I could put in that would be useful.
Often I start off adding some street numbers I've collected, and then
trace those houses from nearmap, and then start tracing a creek, and then
start doing something
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Liz wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Dear all,
we've had the changeset feature for quite a while now and I believe
it is very helpful in a number of ways.
I thought I'd have a look at the documentation provided for the
documentation called
2010/7/31 Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com:
Both the police and ambulance service spend a lot of their time on
non-emergency items as do hospitals, doctors, etc. If you want to write an
app that lists the police under an emergencies menu/button then go ahead
but you don't need to change the OSM
On 31/07/2010 10:05, Ulf Lamping wrote:
There are people who actively watch out their area what changes there.
That's fine and valueable. But IMHO it's *their job* to make sense of
the changes, not the mappers job.
What a selfish attitude for a supposedly co-operative project.
It may be
Am 31.07.2010 11:19, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
If that can be solved introducing meaningful new name spaces like
emergency, which could give easy way to filter emergency items, why
not? What is cost of this?
1) Changing it in wiki - one day tops
2) Changing it in db - mass convertation, doable
On 31 July 2010 19:24, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
I don't understand your attitude at all: it hardly takes a moment to add a
helpful comment, but many minutes or hours to make the change itself. It is
hardly a burden.
You gave a very simplistic comment example, how about
Am 31.07.2010 11:24, schrieb David Earl:
On 31/07/2010 10:05, Ulf Lamping wrote:
There are people who actively watch out their area what changes there.
That's fine and valueable. But IMHO it's *their job* to make sense of
the changes, not the mappers job.
What a selfish attitude for a
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:24 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
I'm in the group who think that changeset comments are waste of time
because:
- you may have vandalism with nice comments (and good edits with crappy
comments)
- this is an habit comming from software development and
On 31/07/2010 10:50, John Smith wrote:
On 31 July 2010 19:24, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
I don't understand your attitude at all: it hardly takes a moment to add a
helpful comment, but many minutes or hours to make the change itself. It is
hardly a burden.
You gave a very
On 31 July 2010 20:17, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
And you are selfish to be making demands that some deem
unreasonable... see I can twist logic just as much as you can...
___
On 31 July 2010 20:17, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
Oh and I'm still waiting for the comment example based on people that
make a lot more edits than a simply changing the direction a one way
street runs...
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 03:53:19 pm John Smith wrote:
On 31 July 2010 20:17, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
Oh and I'm still waiting for the comment example based on people that
make a lot more edits than a simply
Am 31.07.2010 12:17, schrieb David Earl:
On 31/07/2010 10:50, John Smith wrote:
Frankly I'd rather spend my time mapping than telling everyone to the
nth degree what my life story about why I made a change.
sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
Calling someone selfish when
On 30/07/2010 09:40, Ed Avis wrote:
problem with 100Kb then I'd be inclined to blame your browser.
Which browser do you use? (I use Firefox 3.7 on Windows, with no http proxy
server configured.)
Are you sure? I didn't think it had been released yet.
3.6.8 for me (There's a Beta v4
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
We have regularly professionals coming and asking to this community to work
like professionals with good comments and sourcing.
Sourcing might be the only meaningfull comment I could see. This is the only
important information
On 31/07/2010 11:52, Pieren wrote:
Sourcing might be the only meaningfull comment I could see. This is the
only important information that cannot be retrieved by software and is
required to justify some actions e.g. features displacements. We should
better replace 'comment' by 'source' in the
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Total time 6 minutes
Hundreds of hours, yeah right.
What you have given is an absolute minimum time for someone who
already understands to actually edit the files. You've skipped
research, testing and deployment.
The
Hi John,
On Samstag, 31. Juli 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 31 July 2010 20:17, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
Oh and I'm still waiting for the comment example based on people that
make a lot more edits than a simply
2010/7/31 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Am 31.07.2010 11:19, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
If that can be solved introducing meaningful new name spaces like
emergency, which could give easy way to filter emergency items, why
not? What is cost of this?
1) Changing it in wiki - one day
Hi Ulf,
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Calling someone selfish when he spends his spare time mapping stuff and
adds that to OSM is simply bullshit.
I, too, find your attitude funny. You spend an hour doing edits, then
cannot be bothered to spend a minute to think of a good changeset
comment. Instead,
On 31 July 2010 22:05, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
That is indeed selfish, because you're saying that your time is more
valuable than theirs.
And you are saying their time is more valuable than the person
contributing the data, this is going no where fast, people have their
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
On 31/07/2010 11:52, Pieren wrote:
Sourcing might be the only meaningfull comment I could see. This is the
only important information that cannot be retrieved by software and is
required to justify some actions e.g.
On Saturday 31 July 2010 11:17:16 Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
josm will not upload a changeset if the comments field is blank - but it
prefills the comment field with the last comment, which is worse than
blank. At the same time mercurial and subversion from the command line will
not permit a
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
You spend an hour doing edits, then
cannot be bothered to spend a minute to think of a good changeset
comment.
so how do *you* summarise adding POIs and side streets and putting in maxspeed
along a hundred km of highway?
because i just put in the
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
You spend an hour doing edits, then
cannot be bothered to spend a minute to think of a good changeset
comment.
so how do *you* summarise adding POIs and side streets and putting in
On Saturday 31 July 2010 14:00:40 Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Teaching each and every mapper out there that the tag has changed and
they should no longer use the old one (not every mapper uses presets).
And they never never never read wiki, or follow OSM news?
Actually if this thread was not
Work out why it doesn't appear (5 min - your patch is actually very
slightly wrong btw, can you spot your mistake?)
Spotted my friday afternoon coding did you. Glad to see someones on the ball!!
However the above is just for fun - lets replace my original statement
with 'a lot of time' and
Liz,
Liz wrote:
so how do *you* summarise adding POIs and side streets and putting in maxspeed
along a hundred km of highway?
because i just put in the name of where i have been, that's all.
and that is glaringly obvious from the bounding box
I believe that the changeset comment should be
On 31 July 2010 22:47, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Sounds sensible to me, I'm busy tracing new nearmap imagery.
With extremely useful changeset comments? :)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 31 July 2010 22:53, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
pick from anywhere between nobody's gonna read this anyway to if you want
That's sad because, as I pointed out, if you get into the habit of writing
good changeset comments then the additional work this causes is going to be
On 31 July 2010 23:25, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
No. Equally valuable. But they are more. Only one person makes the edits,
but more than one person look at the edits.
Sure, if on average more than one person views the changeset
information, is this really happening though?
All
Well, in my area at least (Nashville, TN, USA), the aerial images seem pretty
well aligned with the actual street locations. The corrections I am speaking
of tend to be needed only here and there, not overall. Much of the street
location info on the OSM map in my area originated in the TIGER
On 31 July 2010 21:09, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
You can see the what but never the why.
Most changesets seem to summerise what they did not why they did it,
the only why that you could get from a changeset is from any source
tags as someone else pointed out, however there
One thing I found unfortunate is that when we switched to API 0.6 to
support changeset comments we also limited the length of values to 255
characters.
So because of that you end up with really long run-on sentences
like that to describe large changes making it hard to write them and
to
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
John,
John Smith wrote:
On 31 July 2010 22:05, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
That is indeed selfish, because you're saying that your time is more
valuable than theirs.
And you are saying their time is
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Can the maintainers of JOSM please get rid of the silly feature that
makes changeset comments manditory? It results in a lot of garbage like
the ..., some mapping, fixed stuff, or none of your business
examples which Frederik cited.
It's a two-sided thing.
Ulf Lamping wrote:
There are people who actively watch out their area what changes there.
That's fine and valueable. But IMHO it's *their job* to make sense of
the changes, not the mappers job.
[...]
Don't be fooled; the small changeset comment that you enter when
uploading stuff *will* be
Currently I'm cleaning up in Ottawa, I have over 8,000 errors to clean
up left and recently I've probably cleaned at least a couple of
thousand errors so far. Things like incorrect street names, where I
have a CANVEC source that helps enormously, connecting streets up so
you can run routing
On 1 August 2010 02:18, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I could imagine dropping the mandatory changeset comment, but when left
empty, display a pop-up that explains why changeset comments are important
and ask the user to reconsider. (Indeed that dialog could be shown whenever
the
john whelan wrote:
Currently I'm cleaning up in Ottawa, I have over 8,000 errors to clean
up left and recently I've probably cleaned at least a couple of
thousand errors so far. Things like incorrect street names, where I
have a CANVEC source that helps enormously, connecting streets up so
As pointed out, you only have 255 characters. No one is suggesting a
book needs to be written. There is a difference between useful and
exhaustive. All we are asking for is useful comments. Cleaning up
validator problems in Ottowa using a CANVEC source or pull the
reference to CANVEC out into a
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I could imagine dropping the mandatory changeset comment, but when left
empty, display a pop-up that explains why changeset comments are
important and ask the user to reconsider. (Indeed that dialog could be
shown whenever the changeset comment is less than 15 characters
Hi,
Tobias Knerr wrote:
I believe that people will only provide truly useful changeset comments
if they do so voluntarily.
But at least one person in this thread has said something along the
lines oh I didn't know these were so important actually. *That* is
surely something that could have
On 31-7-2010 18:49, Toby Murray wrote:
If you are in an area with more than a few active mappers I can
*guarantee* you that at least one other person is looking at your
changeset comments. I live in the middle of nowhere Kansas and I know
at least one other person is watching the area.
Even
John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com writes:
Frankly I'd rather spend my time mapping than telling everyone to the
nth degree what my life story about why I made a change.
Steady on. Nobody says you should repeat in the comment what is already clear
from the changes made. That would be
Another way to look at it is that it's your own time you are saving.
If another mapper has a question about your changes and they have to contact
you and you need to reply, that uses a lot more time than a quick explanation
attached to the change when it was uploaded.
Certainly doing so takes a
Liz edodd at billiau.net writes:
so how do *you* summarise adding POIs and side streets and putting in maxspeed
along a hundred km of highway?
because i just put in the name of where i have been, that's all.
I'd also mention how I found the data - spotted from the car window as I drove
past,
john whelan jwhelan0112 at gmail.com writes:
Currently I'm cleaning up in Ottawa, I have over 8,000 errors to clean
up left and recently I've probably cleaned at least a couple of
thousand errors so far. Things like incorrect street names, where I
have a CANVEC source that helps enormously,
Dave F. davefox at madasafish.com writes:
I use Firefox 3.7 on Windows,
Are you sure?
You're right - it's 3.6.3. I have seen the same problem with other Firefox
versions and with Google Chrome, however.
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
___
talk
On 31-7-2010 19:54, Ed Avis wrote:
I do something similar cleaning the data using the http://keepright.ipax.at/
data checker, primarily fixing junctions so the map is routable. Ordinarily
I'll just write 'fixed junctions' as the comment. Only if I think there is
some potential doubt or
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Only the 'why'
not the 'what' needs to be stated. That normally shouldn't be more than
one
sentence.
You are two, with David Earl saying that. But that's a big difference with
what Frederik and others are saying. They want
Total trivia. Ever wonder where the most dense mapping in the OSM is?
There are a few candidates:
Paris is impressive:
http://osm.org/go/0BOd2jSc
But if you look at how it's built, a lot of points are shared in
relations (as it should be, but not winning the most dense award)
In Germany
On 1 August 2010 03:43, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Another way to look at it is that it's your own time you are saving.
If another mapper has a question about your changes and they have to contact
you and you need to reply, that uses a lot more time than a quick explanation
attached to
Wow that is impressive. Although they could have saved themselves a
little time by using highway=turning_circle for all those cul-de-sacs
and not having to render a perfect circle by hand :)
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, John Harvey j...@johnharveyphoto.com wrote:
Total trivia. Ever wonder
Hi,
The area in Berlin you're referring to is 'The Memorial to the Murdered
Jews of Europe [...] the central place for remembrance and a place of
warning.'
http://www.visitberlin.de/english/sightseeing/e_si_sehenswuerdigkeiten-details.php?code=16440
There are quite a few photos on the site
John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com writes:
If another mapper has a question about your changes and they have to contact
you and you need to reply, that uses a lot more time than a quick explanation
attached to the change when it was uploaded.
I can count using my fingers and toes the
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
About the 'why', I can already tell you :- if someone displaces 20 nodes, the
'why' is because this person things that his source is more accurate than the
previous contribution. The 'why' is a more accurate source.
Indeed - and all that's needed is to mention
On 1 August 2010 04:39, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Agreed. I think the comment should say 'why' not 'what', and if the change is
derived from something other than ground survey, cite the source used. It
shouldn't take more than a few seconds.
I generally always use source=* (and
Lennard ldp at xs4all.nl writes:
I do something similar cleaning the data using the http://keepright.ipax.at/
data checker, primarily fixing junctions so the map is routable. Ordinarily
I'll just write 'fixed junctions' as the comment.
'fixed junctions based on keepright reports'
I would put
Many are very simple, St instead of Street, doesn't sound much but it
stops some search and other tools. Multiple imports each with
different defaults, some forgot the street name, many didn't import
where an existing street was, OK but combine that with up to 200
meters out probably drawn in
Ed,
I hear your point about commenting on the why not the what. I
agree that the why is important. But personally I try to add the
what and the where as well:
'Adjusted road positions based on GPS traces'
There's your why and what already; I'd probably say adjusted road
positions in
My favourite of the day Fair Oaks Crescent / Beechcliffe Street for
a street name, its actually two streets that have been linked
together, so break them apart and name them correctly.
Cheerio John
On 31 July 2010 12:46, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
john whelan wrote:
Currently
John,
impressive looking maps indeed... but:
My vote for most point dense is part of Bakersfield, California:
If you look at the duplicate node map then it's no surprise they are
point dense - if you have two copies of each that's not hard:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Agreed. I think the comment should say 'why' not 'what'
What does that mean?
What: made a road into a dual carriageway
Why: ???
I assume you don't want an explanation of my vision of my role in the universe.
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Cartinus wrote:
And nobody puts
all Key: and Tag: pages in his wiki watchlist.
Use one of the feeds (eg RSS) and it is easy.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Ed Avis wrote:
Another way to look at it is that it's your own time you are saving.
If another mapper has a question about your changes and they have to
contact you and you need to reply, that uses a lot more time than a quick
explanation attached to the change when it was
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Ed Avis wrote:
Liz edodd at billiau.net writes:
so how do *you* summarise adding POIs and side streets and putting in
maxspeed along a hundred km of highway?
because i just put in the name of where i have been, that's all.
I'd also mention how I found the data -
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Agreed. I think the comment should say 'why' not 'what'
What does that mean?
What: made a road into a dual carriageway
Why: ???
I assume you don't want an
On 31/07/2010 20:43, Frederik Ramm wrote:
If you look at the duplicate node map then it's no surprise they are
point dense - if you have two copies of each that's not hard:
My Lord, take a look at France. Any idea what happened there?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 31 July 2010 10:36, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Then it doesn't help at all - what if ODbL 1.1 says that you can freely
relicense to CC-Zero? And if you think that can't happen, go look at the GNU
Free Documentation Licence 1.3 and Wikipedia. That kind of legal hijinks
This is exactly my point and gets back to another thread from a few weeks
back regarding tagging schools and the sometimes multiple uses that each
building can have (ie after hours classes, church groups on a weekend etc
etc). From memory I believe that discussion was resolved by tagging
start/end
Acredito que não haja uma tag específica, uma vez que o projeto nasceu na
Inglaterra e lá todas as ruas são mão inglesa :)
Se quiser ser específico, creio que você possa usar a tag note=mão
inglesa.
[]s
Em 31 de julho de 2010 15:05, Rafael Gassner rafael.gass...@gmail.comescreveu:
Oi Pessoal,
Hallo Liste,
bin gerade dabei Dörfer zu mappen. Um die Orte auf der Karte besser
einzugrenzen, möchte ich ein place=village area zeichnen. Luftbilder
geht leider nicht. Yahoo hat eine zu schlechte Auflösung. Gibt es noch
andere Quellen? Wurden nicht mal place auf der OSM Karte in größeren
Am 30.07.2010 um 08:17 schrieb Guenther Meyer:
Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010, 23:44:33 schrieb steffterra:
Nunja. da gehts ja um die aktuell etablierten Autobahnspuren, die
bei jeder
baulichen Trennung ja auch so gezeichnet werden sollten. Oder habe
ich
etwas übersehen?
inklusive
Am 30.07.2010 um 08:27 schrieb Guenther Meyer:
Für die Umsetzung müssen natürlich alle an einem Strang ziehen.
+1
Abwärtskompatibilität bleibt ja dennoch erhalten.
lassen wir uns ueberraschen. ich denke das koennte bei deinem Modell
interessant werden.
Man muesste mal ausprobieren, was
Hierzu ein paar Links:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gemeindegrenze
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Germany/Grenzen
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Grenze_zeichnen
--
View this message in context:
Hi !
in der letzten Zeit habe ich mich ausgiebig mit der Erfassung von
Landuse beschäftigt. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen das viele Grünflächen
(schreibe bewußt nicht Weide oder Wiese) mit landuse = farmland
definiert haben.
Wenn ich jetzt im Wiki bei landuse = meadow [1] nachlese dann steht da
moin,
Am 31.07.2010 13:28, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Ist die Wiese vielleicht nur zur Heugewinnung und es dürfen keine Kühe
Co dort laufen oder wie ist das zu verstehen.
richtig, eine Wiese wird gemäht (heute wohl mehr zur Silagegewinnung),
eine Weide wird vom Vieh beweidet.
VG
Jörk
Am Samstag 31 Juli 2010, 09:25:54 schrieb steffterra:
Beim Renderer ist es so: der alte Renderer zeigt nur den datenway, da
dieser eine Straßenklassifizierung hat. Die Richtungsways werden gar
nicht gerendert, da der highway-tag fehlt.
wenn ich dich richtig verstehe, koennen die zusaetzlichen
OT: geht's bitte auch ohne HTML?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am Samstag 31 Juli 2010, 09:38:45 schrieb steffterra:
der Editor kennt die Referenzrichtung des Weges, und kann sein
backward Tag
danach ausrichten und entsprechend anzeigen.
Wie das in der Realitaet aussieht, weiss sowieso nur der User.
Die Problem ist doch, dass der user es irgendwo
Hallo,
Wo ist die Verbindung von Josm zu Landsat geblieben.??
.mfg
Rolf
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Wenn ich jetzt im Wiki bei landuse = meadow [1] nachlese dann steht da
Wiese ohne Gehölzer
... aber so (Wiese) auch nur in der deutschen Version
Wenn ich mir nun aber den Eintrag für landuse = farmland ansehe sind auf
den Bild mehrere Gründlandflächen abgebildet und
hike39 glaubte zu wissen:
Am 28.07.2010 03:39, schrieb Florian Gross:
Johann H. Addicks glaubte zu wissen:
Hallo, entsinne mich, dass das Plugin Piclayer früher einmal eine
Funktion hatte, um geladene Bilder nicht nur zu zoomen und zu drehen,
sondern auch zu verschieben (Icon mit blauen
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
