Re: Unix MBX format exports non-standard?

Another list member has helped me solve this problem. It appears that TB! saves the file in "Unix format", which I believe refers to the linefeeds used. By using TextPad and resaving in "PC format" (thus altering the linefeeds) the file exports perfectly with the GMail Loader. Thanks Jacob, for

Re: Unix MBX format exports non-standard?

Thursday, August 11, 2005, 10:44:47 PM, Robin wrote: RA> For emails without attachments, the Unix mailbox format should look RA> pretty much like what you see with "View Source", except that there RA> should be an additional line at the very beginning that starts with RA> "From " with NO colon fol

Unix MBX format exports non-standard?

Hello TBUDLers, I've been trying to transfer some of my mail to GMail using GML (GMail Loader). Having selected THREE messages in a TB! folder and selected "Save as..." and specified a Unix MBX format, I then point the GML at this file and here's what I get. --8<-- 1 Forwarded a

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Saturday, June 25, 2005, 7:50:18 PM, Roelof wrote: RO> You don't have to install TB again. RO> TB's registry entries are created by executing the program, so it RO> suffices to run TB after you've deleted its entries from the registry. Ah! Another snippet. See, when I was first trying to solve

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:50:28 PM, Alexander wrote: ASK> Given your criteria, no program is multiuser aware, because they all use ASK> their own set of settings for each user that logs on (IE, OE, Outlook, ASK> Opera, Firefox are all perfectly multi-user aware, and they are not when ASK> you loo

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Saturday, June 25, 2005, 4:32:42 AM, Alexander wrote: >> what does TB! do if you *do* install it under separate Windows users? ASK> Ehhh? How do you install a program twice? I take it you know the literal answer to your question but are wondering why one would do it. Further back in this thread

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Friday, June 24, 2005, 6:38:09 PM, I wrote: AJ> Perhaps TB! is not to blame but that old standby 'documentation'. Given AJ> there are no instructions on how to access from multiple Windows AJ> accounts, and the default advice on TBUDL is 'copy the registry AJ> entries', then the default configura

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Thursday, June 23, 2005, 8:03:21 PM, Roelof wrote: RO> Apparently, you're the only one using your computer. What when you're RO> using it with multiple people ech with their own preferences? No, I'm not. But I take your point. AJ>> After all, if I set up a new email AJ>> account, or create colo

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Friday, June 24, 2005, 4:27:57 PM, Jonathan wrote: JA> Am I right in assuming you have your mail directory stored under JA> TheBat! application directory (for example c:\Program Files\TheBat!\)? Nope. On a separate drive where I keep most of my data. JA> If that is the case, then the reason you

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Thursday, June 23, 2005, 3:33:58 AM, Alexander wrote: >> Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has >> with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If >> you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are >> a breeze and multi-

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 10:38:11 PM, Allie wrote: >> Given that TB! is clearly a multi-user application, wouldn't it be a >> good idea for them to support Windows' capability? AM> Well, it does. I get the feeling that you want what happens to TB!'s AM> configuration when logged into XP as user

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Thursday, June 23, 2005, 5:32:21 AM, Allie wrote: AM> The large apps will likely need a centralized system of configuration. Why? Take a look at J2EE. It has bucket loads of configuration and it is all done in properties files. Sure they are scattered a bit, but 'centralised' does not mean you

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 8:47:31 PM, Jeff wrote: >> Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has >> with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If >> you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are >> a breeze and multi-user

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 10:13:20 PM, Allie wrote: >> When logging on as a TB! group, accounts which are in the group but >> not in registry under "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\Users >> Depot" are removed from the group. This is a permanent removal. AM> By 'permanent removal', do you me

Ancient bug finally revealed!

Hello TBUDLers, I've had a few bitches and moans on here about my Number One Bug (apologies to Stephen King, but some days I just imagine Kathy Bates in my PC causing this mayhem with a sledgehammer). It's the one where my TB! groups keep losing accounts (and I keep losing hairs). Well, tonight

Re: Access to The Bat! (User account with limited rights, Windows XP Home)

Tuesday, June 7, 2005, 5:48:49 AM, Christian wrote: CF> I do not manage to run The Bat! as "User A" (Shortcut on Windows CF> Desctop exists). Every attempt ends up with this report: CF> Error during setup of working directory CF> C:\Documents...\Application data\All users\The Bat! Have you copied

Re: Is it worth upgrading to v3.5.25?

Friday, June 3, 2005, 8:12:22 PM, Robin wrote: RA> Now that v3.5.25 has been released, can anyone volunteer an opinion RA> about whether it is worth upgrading from v3.0.1.33? Are there any RA> significant bugs, issues or other annoyances still left in it? Well, it has fixed my Access Violation p

Re: Version 3.5 major bug!

Saturday, May 21, 2005, 1:16:08 AM, Stuart wrote: AJ>> Yes, that was me (aka ZKARJ). The other bug is #: SC> ^ SC>Maybe they thought with this name you were from another SC>planet. :) AJ>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2094

Re: Version 3.5 major bug!

Friday, May 20, 2005, 12:41:30 AM, Stuart wrote: SC> Sometimes persistence pays off. ;) Did you report the bugs on SC> BugTrack? What is the other bug you have? Yes, that was me (aka ZKARJ). The other bug is #2094: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2094 It's over a year old. The bug repo

Re: Version 3.5 major bug!

Thursday, May 19, 2005, 12:23:12 PM, Andrew wrote: AC> I'm afraid I've been guilty of changing the subject of a thread by AC> bringing this up in my original post, for which I apologise; I'm AC> rather a beginner in these things. Am I allowed to revert to the AC> original question raised by Allist

Re: Version 3.5 major bug!

Saturday, May 14, 2005, 8:01:28 PM, Alexander wrote: ASK> Hello Allister Jenks & everyone else, ASK> on 14-Mai-2005 at 09:08 you (Allister Jenks) wrote: >> If I log on as anything other than an administrator account I cannot >> create new emails. This includes reply a

Version 3.5 major bug!

Hello TBUDLers, Reported as #4639 ( https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4639 ). If I log on as anything other than an administrator account I cannot create new emails. This includes reply and forwarding. This is pretty serious! (Marck, Windows won't let TB! function properly. ;-) ) I d

Re: Threading

Friday, May 13, 2005, 10:51:10 PM, Marck wrote: AJ>> Surely, unless one has a large number of folders to filter out to, AJ>> then any of those target folders is also going to be relatively AJ>> high traffic? MDP> No folder is as "high traffic" as the inbox. None. every incoming MDP> message pause

Re: Threading

Friday, May 13, 2005, 9:18:44 PM, Marck wrote: MDP> Add a simple outbound mail filter to move sent mail straight to the MDP> Inbox. But here, I have to step into soapbox mode. It's not wise to MDP> use the inbox as a main storage folder - it is high traffic. I keep MDP> mine empty. Once you have a

Re: Alter/remove headers in received mail?

Thursday, May 12, 2005, 7:37:28 PM, Robin wrote: RA> On Thu 12 May 2005, 17:00:22 +1000, Allister Jenks wrote: >> How can I modify a received email's headers? RA> I use a manual filter that writes the email to a file in unix mailbox RA> format, opens my text editor and

Alter/remove headers in received mail?

Hello TBUDLers, I have PopFile marking my spam with a header which I then catch with a TB! filter and send the way of the trash. On the odd occasion where PopFile gives a false positive I simply drag the email back to the inbox. However, recently I wrote a new filter and while re-filtering the i

Re: Filtering issue

Friday, May 6, 2005, 6:58:42 PM, Allister wrote: AJ> Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 6:41:56 AM, MAU wrote: M>> You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list. AJ> See my response to MikeD - I strongly suspect this could well be a AJ> production problem! AJ> Mine is 3.01.13. Oh,

Re: Filtering issue

Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 3:55:16 AM, MikeD wrote: M3> One of the spam messages ended up in my "known" folder and I checked M3> my address book three times to be sure and neither the From nor the M3> To address appear in my address book. I've not seen that problem, but I do have a very similar one

Re: Was I dreaming...?

Thursday, May 5, 2005, 9:54:59 PM, Thomas wrote: AJ>> Thank goodness for that. Thunderbird is installed and in partial use AJ>> already. I updated bug 2094 (yes, it is that old) in the hopes it will AJ>> receive some attention. I'm not holding my breath. Status after 17 AJ>> months is "reviewe

Re: Filtering issue

Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 6:41:56 AM, MAU wrote: M> You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list. See my response to MikeD - I strongly suspect this could well be a production problem! Mine is 3.01.13. -- Cheers, Allister :flag-newzealand: New Zealand / Aotearoa _

Re: Was I dreaming...?

Monday, May 2, 2005, 7:12:20 AM, Marek wrote: MM> new version 3.5 with major changes in GUI will be released in May, we MM> have first Release Candidate actually. Thank goodness for that. Thunderbird is installed and in partial use already. I updated bug 2094 (yes, it is that old) in the hopes

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Monday, April 4, 2005, 2:12:15 PM, Paul wrote: PB> Have you asked the List about grouping? The list has helped me over PB> the years. Oh, yes! I had a gripe quite recently and many tried to help, but to no avail. -- Cheers, Allister :flag-newzealand: New Zealand / Aotearoa _

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Sunday, April 3, 2005, 10:57:11 AM, Alexander wrote: ASK> This perhaps leads to a meta discussion about the different types and ASK> motivations of free software, and it was not my intention to lead the ASK> discussion into that direction. Sheesh! All I did was recommend AVG on the basis that it

Re: Changes to the TB Lists

Saturday, April 2, 2005, 3:19:27 AM, Leif wrote: LG> From today forward, to remain a subscriber to our realm of goodness on LG> the TB lists, it'll cost you $5,000 per month. Note the quoted time and date! Due to the fact that I live on the "leading edge" of the world, I am now subject to a dast

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Friday, April 1, 2005, 10:05:22 PM, Jeff wrote: JG> Has anybody any recommendations for an effective A/V product that will JG> work unobtrusively in the background and check my incoming email? I recommend AVG. The best part is it is free! I've used it for years now with zero issues and it integ

Re: Good grief! The bug STILL exists

Thursday, March 10, 2005, 9:14:39 PM, MAU wrote: M> Hello Allister, >> Yes, it worked. M> Glad to hear that :-) So you'll be "unglad" to hear that today it has reverted to losing that last account again!!! I cannot fathom how it picked which account to ignore unless it is something to do with

Re: Good grief! The bug STILL exists

Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 11:20:22 PM, MAU wrote: M> Why don't you try something? First, backup all your TB data (mail M> directory. Then move your "groups.cfg" file top a different directory M> and start TB to see what happens. Inspired! Well, if I had put my own thinking cap on I *might* have

Re: Good grief! The bug STILL exists

Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 1:36:36 PM, MFPA wrote: M> After re-installing TB!, as long as I do not re-create the account M> I put into a group I am not locked out of the other accounts. As M> soon as I do, I have to enter a username to get into TB! and can M> only access that one account. This happ

Re: Good grief! The bug STILL exists

Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 2:08:09 AM, Gerard wrote: G> Wel this sounds like the data isn't written to file. G> But one question, how did you get you other email accounts in there? I wish I knew! Truth be told, I think it only became an issue once I got past about 6 accounts. From memory, one ti

Re: Good grief! The bug STILL exists

Tuesday, March 8, 2005, 8:48:56 AM, Robin wrote: RA> I'm not sure what you mean by "add the account to the group". If I did I RA> would try to reproduce your problem. Also to MFPA. I mean, sign on to TB! as an administrator and select "Options" and then "Network and Administration". On the grou

Good grief! The bug STILL exists

Hello TBUDLers, For the first time in ages, I added a new email account to TB! (I am changing ISPs). Blow me down if that old group bug isn't still there in version 3.0.1.33. I add the account to the group and all works fine - until I log off. Then it disappears. Between this and vapourware (V

Re: TB voyager : mobile solution...

Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 1:48:05 AM, Mica wrote: >> That's why God (or at least the fellows at Apple) invented the iPod. >> :-) MM> What's that, actually? Essentially, a hard-disk based portable audio player. It's something of a phenomenon lately... http://www.apple.com/ipod/ -- Cheers,

Re: TB voyager : mobile solution...

Monday, February 21, 2005, 6:35:25 AM, Alexander wrote: ASK> Flash memory is said to hold for about 100,000 write operations before it ASK> will start to fail. Depending on the number of mails you get & store on the ASK> stick, the flash memory will wear out pretty soon... That's why God (or at l

Re: Bat Voyager

Saturday, February 19, 2005, 8:53:01 AM, Marten wrote: >> Not the first time I did not receive an announcement email from >> RitLabs. MG> I must have got yours then - I got it twice! Same here, but that has been normal for recent emails from RIT. Best vapourware I've seen in ages. -- Cheers,

Re: hard code percent sign (i.e. %) in QT?

Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 5:09:35 PM, Greg wrote: GS> Anyway to hard code a percent sign (i.e. %) so it actually shows up in a GS> message derived from a quick template? Don't know for fact, but often something like %% should work. I.e. double-up the 'escape' character (% in this case). --

Re: The Bat! 3.01 Automatically Registered itself?

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 2:49:38 PM, Bob wrote: BM> I finally took the plunge and downloaded version 3.0.1.33 the other BM> day and paid my registration via CIFNET. My registration e-mail BM> arrived this morning and I viewed in from the Ticker. Immediately BM> after I got a pop-up window tha

Re: OT Time stamps [was Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)]

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 3:08:35 PM, Mary wrote: MB>>> I know you are on a large continent, also. AJ>> Umm. Nope. One timezone. MB> Well, but with the entire Pacific on either side. ;) Actually wrong again! (Sorry!) Pacific to the North, East and South, but the Tasman Sea to the West

Re: OT Time stamps [was Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)]

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 4:04:21 PM, Maria wrote: SC>> Wouldn't this be +1200, or are you on Daylight Saving Time. :) MCR> Yep, until the last Saturday of October. Than, it's back to GMT. That would be a very short period for daylight savings. It ends on the third Sunday in March and then g

Re: OT Time stamps [was Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)]

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 3:43:12 PM, Stuart wrote: MCR>> On 16 October 2004 at 14:52:03GMT +1300 (which was 02:52 where I live) SC> Wouldn't this be +1200, or are you on Daylight Saving Time. :) The standard time is indeed +1200. We started daylight saving on the first Sunday in October.

Re: OT Time stamps [was Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)]

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 3:28:59 PM, Maria wrote: MCR> NZ is the antipodes of Lisbon, where I live. How does it feel living MCR> upside down? :) .smelborp yna deciton t'nevah I Seriously though - if gravity weren't stronger than the centrifugal force, nobody would be right-side-up anyway! --

Re: OT Time stamps [was Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)]

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 12:17:37 PM, Mary wrote: MB> I know you are on a large continent, also. Umm. Nope. One timezone. http://www.tourism.org.nz/ You weren't thinking of Australia were you? -- Cheers, Allister :flag-newzealand: New Zealand / Aotearoa ___

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)

Saturday, October 9, 2004, 1:12:44 AM, Mica wrote: MM> Btw, is good to have local time also quoted, altho just a remark about MM> time zone(s) helps enough too. I've been absent from the list for a while and have just taken the time to read some posts - this being the first. I have to agree with

Re: I love BayesIT!

Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 12:56:34 PM, Michael wrote: MLW> No Bayes based filter will ever be 100% perfect. I believe, however, MLW> that BayesIT is a very good implementation of the Bayes calculations. It is such a shame, then, that it stuffs up many peoples' systems, including mine. If anyo

Summary of v3?

Hello TBUDLers, Having tired of reading the many-and-rambling threads on v3, would somebody who has had the time please summarise: 1) The issues/bugs 2) Any info from RIT about licensing issues I know many TBUDLers are unhappy with the affair (and some aren't), but has there been *any* response

Re: What is a natural email system?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 11:23:42 AM, Michael wrote: MLW> What makes The Bat a natural email system. Can someone please explain MLW> what this phrase means and why it is attached to The Bat? If you've used Outlook 2000, you will know it is decidely unnatural to use. TB! isn't. -- Cheers, A

Re: What defines a mailto?

Thursday, August 26, 2004, 7:48:26 PM, Maurice wrote: MS> Well, in all actuality, it isn't a 'mailto:' considering the string MS> 'mailto:' isn't part of it. Granted. But if I write... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...without specifying "mailto:"; at the front, TB! realises it is an email address and high

What defines a mailto?

Hello TBUDLers, Any idea why TB! does not recognise the following as a mailto: ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've changed the 1's and the alphabet part to disguise the real address (it's a mailing list confirmation). The = sign seems to replace the @ in my address, and may be the problem? -- Cheers, A

Re: Frayed threads?

Saturday, July 24, 2004, 12:06:11 AM, Allie wrote: AM> Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote: >> Oops! Sorry. Looks like a template to fix! AM> Bitten by the To: macro? :) AM> It's a lot better to create templates for the lists using address book AM> templates. Give the list addr

Re: Frayed threads?

Friday, July 23, 2004, 7:21:32 PM, Allister wrote: AJ> Hello TBOTers... Oops! Sorry. Looks like a template to fix! :confused: -- Cheers, Allister Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUD

Frayed threads?

Hello TBOTers, I know this isn't TBUDL, but it seems that threads are changing spots rather often. Specifically, my "Strange Ills for XP" thread is now discussing at least three topics (yes, ok, I started one of them maybe). Also the "Proposed TB! Help" thread Mary moved here has gone the same w

Re: The Bat! Help files

Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 6:58:18 PM, Roelof wrote: RO> Hallo Allister, RO> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:36:08 +1200GMT (13-7-2004, 8:36 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: AJ>> Perhaps the tag-line should change slightly. Replace 'natural' with AJ>> 'masochistic'. RO> You've lost me here. At the he

Re: The Bat! Help files, including help with outsourced files

Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 1:41:36 AM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff): MB> I got The Bat! for its safety. Retired, with plenty of time, and MB> somewhat paranoid, I look at each message separately on the Dispatcher MB> and decide there whether to delete or download. Perhaps a little too paranoid i

Re: The Bat! Help files

Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 4:36:47 AM, Roelof wrote (amongst other stuff): RO> Though I certainly wouldn't say that TB is the best documented program RO> ever, I certainly can't blame RitLabs too much for the online help. Who else is going to provide it? Or are there people on this list that know t

Re: The Bat! Help files, including help with outsourced files [was Re: BayesIt]

Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff): MB> In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The MB> Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be MB> obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have MB> the late

Re: Table formatting

Monday, July 5, 2004, 2:37:41 AM, Kevin wrote: KA> I understand what you are saying. My only point was that (1)TB is not KA> designed to be a graphic HTML editor. It has some basic tools and that KA> is it. (2) For fancier work, an external (not just MS Office KA> components) program will be neces

Re: Table formatting

Sunday, July 4, 2004, 10:33:11 AM, Kevin wrote: KA> The original poster was working with HTML anyway. At that point there KA> is no harm using an external application to copy a table in-line. Tens KA> of millions of people use it this way (including myself) without KA> difficulty. KA> What exactl

Re: Table formatting

Sunday, July 4, 2004, 4:19:03 AM, Kevin wrote: >> How can one change either the color of the table borders or the style >> (a single line instead of a double line). KA> you'll have to import something you created with another application KA> (i.e. Excel, Word, etc.) Ouch! That could be adding fu

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources - Solved!

Saturday, June 12, 2004, 3:21:08 AM, rich wrote: >>> Woho! Not only is it not hogging CPU, but it is running >>> *really* fast. Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou, thankyou, thankyou! rg> Was that "Process Explorer" product the one that pulled you out of the rg> fire? I guess it pretty much wa

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources - Solved!

Thursday, June 10, 2004, 10:43:07 PM, Allie wrote: AM> The Bayesit plugin directory should be in the TB! installation AM> directory. Have you tried moving that directory to another location AM> after exiting TB! and then restarting TB!? Woho! Not only is it not hogging CPU, but it is run

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources

Thursday, June 10, 2004, 6:18:38 PM, Allister wrote: AJ> Thursday, June 10, 2004, 4:31:54 AM, Thomas wrote: TF>> Hello Allister, TF>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:32:37 +1200 GMT (07/06/2004, 14:32 +0700 GMT), TF>> Allister Jenks wrote: AJ>>> Done. Problem remains. :-(

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources

Thursday, June 10, 2004, 4:31:54 AM, Thomas wrote: TF> Hello Allister, TF> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:32:37 +1200 GMT (07/06/2004, 14:32 +0700 GMT), TF> Allister Jenks wrote: AJ>> Done. Problem remains. :-( TF> Too bad. Does it happen only when purging&compressing on exit, o

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources

Sunday, June 6, 2004, 3:42:55 PM, Thomas wrote: AM>>> - a mailbase that is problematic will have TB! spending an AM>>> inordinately long time with it. AJ>> This is my current favourite. Despite my comments above, I originally AJ>> suspected the account I subsequently repaired. Maybe TB! is doin

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources

First of all, Thomas, Rich, Allie, Simon, thanks for the useful feedback. There are a few things I can look at now. This is precisely my beef with the Bug report - no feedback of any kind. Sunday, June 6, 2004, 3:55:48 AM, Allie wrote: AM> Interesting. I've never really ever had a problem with

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources

Saturday, June 5, 2004, 9:49:36 AM, Allister wrote: AJ> Saturday, June 5, 2004, 5:06:56 AM, Simon wrote: SM>> ...the CPU usage goes to 100%... SM>> ...and I have to kill TheBat from the Windows task manager. AJ> OK, attention all! How many times has this basic symptom been reported AJ> now? I

Re: Smileys? Mail Chat?? What's becoming of The Bat!?

Saturday, June 5, 2004, 10:50:29 AM, Martin wrote (in part): AJ>> Yes, but the inclusion of these features has diverted resource from more AJ>> functional and useful features, and from bug elimination. MW> For instance, the new emoticon feature was put together some weeks MW> ago "for personal us

Re: Smileys? Mail Chat?? What's becoming of The Bat!?

Saturday, June 5, 2004, 7:32:13 AM, Mark wrote: MP> Besides, you can disable both features completely if you wish. And MP> it isn't hard to do so. Yes, but the inclusion of these features has diverted resource from more functional and useful features, and from bug elimination. -- Cheers, Allis

Re: 2.11 consume all CPU resources

Saturday, June 5, 2004, 5:06:56 AM, Simon wrote: SM> ...the CPU usage goes to 100%... SM> ...and I have to kill TheBat from the Windows task manager. OK, attention all! How many times has this basic symptom been reported now? I had a bit of a rant on here recently about getting my bug report l

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Sunday, May 30, 2004, 2:17:43 AM, Martin wrote: MW> Since I'm on a promise from Leif MW> I thought I'd risk making MW> the point that the off-topic part of this thread was just 3 messages... Yes, the *first* three. And now Paul's makes 4. So, to send this thread complete

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Saturday, May 29, 2004, 5:07:59 PM, Thomas wrote: TF> No, that only mean it is appropriate for TBBETA and not for TBUDL. TF> After the release it will be appropriate here. Saved me saying it myself, thanks. I am not trying to leap all over people for this, but given the usual veracity of moderat

Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB! version

Saturday, May 29, 2004, 6:14:12 AM, Mary wrote: Surely this thread is: 1) OT 2) Beta related 3) A personal chit-chat referring to others of same ilk 4) Making some people wonder "What the hell are they talking about?" and therefore 5) Not appropriate for this list 6) Inappropriate for a moder

Re: Bug pressure?

Saturday, May 29, 2004, 3:54:38 AM, michael wrote: > I have been in Software QA for over 25 years. I just want to say that > a "bug" like you posted looks a great deal like a problem with your > computer. I totally agree that's what it could be. My point was that pretty much nothing had been sai

Bug pressure?

Hello TBUDLers, What does it take to get a bug looked at lately? I posted this bug https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002755 on March 31st and, apart from a 'similar to' and a 'still happening?' bugnote, there has been no communication that it is even being looked at

Re: Opening url with non-default browser

Monday, May 17, 2004, 10:19:09 AM, Martin wrote: MW>>> You forgot to mention the version of Windows you use... C>> Windows XP, Home Edition MW> In that case, you can create your own profile and change the default MW> applications for mail and Web browsing. Right click on the Start button MW> and

Re: anybody PLEASE

Thursday, May 6, 2004, 1:51:40 AM, Manfred wrote: ME> That's what I guessed. Strange thing is: when I display the same ME> message say in Becky I can read it perfectly, the same like seeing the ME> html part in IE itself. Only TheBAt uses the tiny fonts. ME> Normally these messages are from OE or

Backup/Restore for suspected corrupt account

Hello TBUDLers, Not so long ago (as I remember it) there was a discussion about recovering a corrupted mail account by means of renames and restores but I cannot, for the life of me, locate it in the archives. I have an account (my oldest one) which had been playing up on compresses and the like

Re: Ver 2.10 Unread Tab

Saturday, April 17, 2004, 7:49:50 PM, I wrote: AJ> From the 'Changes' doc that shows during install: AJ> Folder set tabs for viewing limited sets of AJ> folders like folders with unread messages, AJ> Virtual Folders and folders associated with a AJ> particular Colour Group ...however, I

Re: Ver 2.10 Unread Tab

Saturday, April 17, 2004, 2:56:55 PM, Munango-Keewati wrote: MK> Could someone explain to me the purpose of the Unread tab if all MK> messages--read, unread, parked, etc--are still displayed in the right MK> panel when that tab is selected? One would expect to see only unread MK> messages display

Re: POPFile (was Re:Bayesit plugin and filters executing order)

Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 11:41:56 PM, Adam wrote: AC> Now all I've got to do is find a way of getting TB to automatically AC> mark quarantined messages as Read. I was just thinking about this one - I personally think it is good they are left unread as it provides a visual prompt to empty the fol

Re: POPFile (was Re:Bayesit plugin and filters executing order)

Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 11:41:56 PM, Adam wrote: AC> I've simply turned off "Confirmation" and "Ask What to Do Next" in the AC> AVG Control Centre and virus laden emails are quietly sent to the AC> quarantine folder without bothering me at all. AC> Now all I've got to do is find a way of gettin

POPFile (was Re:Bayesit plugin and filters executing order)

Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:44:29 AM, dAniel wrote: dh> I for myself use POPFile, which uses the same approach (Bayesian), but dh> is a lot more useful, as it can have as many "buckets" as you want. Eg, dh> I have "spam", "english", "german", "admin" and "PGP". dh> Accuracy is 99.62% for 28293 ma

Re: Lotus Notes

Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 7:33:13 PM, Shahar wrote: >> Does anyone know of a way to import Lotus Notes .nsf (ver 4.5) files into >> TheBat or outlook so I can use the outlook import? S> Can it be done through a CSV ot TXT file ? S> What file formats Lotus can export to ? Good luck with that! I

TB! not ending?

Hello TBUDLers, I seem to have a new problem since installing 2.04.7 in that TB! appears to shut down when asked (the windows and system tray icon disappear), but I discovered that the task (thebat.exe) is still running and consuming a huge chunk of CPU. Anyone else getting this problem or is it

Re: Known filter special?

Monday, March 1, 2004, 1:22:12 PM, Urban wrote: U> Sunday, February 29, 2004, Allister Jenks wrote: >> Alas, this does not seem to be possible? U> Play on sound on incoming mail in the folder that $known$ filters to and U> set the $known$ filter to continue processing. Thanks Ur

Re: Filter as Junk?

Saturday, February 28, 2004, 10:43:15 AM, Allister wrote: AJ>>> I have one account which receives virtually nothing but spam - it's the AJ>>> account I use on websites when I have to. OK, so I know how to do all manner of things with email addresses *recorded on websites*. (And I know all those w

Known filter special?

Hello TBUDLers, Yes, I know it *is* special, but I had an idea that I wanted a sound to be played when something was filtered by it - i.e. some *real* email has arrived. Alas, this does not seem to be possible? -- Cheers, Allister Current vers

Re: TBUDL Current version?

Saturday, February 28, 2004, 8:12:31 PM, Clive wrote: >> Yes and no. The previous release was 2.04.03 and that is more >> logical to me. I'm calling this one 07 for now. CT> I'm with you on this, Marck. The lack of the leading zero in version CT> numbers is very confusing. Surely this is simply

Re[2]: Filter as Junk?

Saturday, February 28, 2004, 8:37:10 AM, Greg wrote: AJ>> I have one account which receives virtually nothing but spam - it's the AJ>> account I use on websites when I have to. GS> You might want to try some Java script for you email for protection. I actually meant I enter that one at other peo

Filter as Junk?

Hello tbudlers, I have one account which receives virtually nothing but spam - it's the account I use on websites when I have to. I just decided that an Inbox filter of 'Sender contains "@"' could be used to train BayesIt with rather less effort on my part (although it gets most of them already).

Re[2]: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 11:22:15 AM, Mark wrote: M> When I installed 2.04.4 over 2.01.3 the installation M> routine presented a default folder for install, which M> I assumed to be the current installation folder. M> However, the default folder presented was M> c:/program files/TheBat M> The 2

Re: SERIOUS problem!

Sunday, February 22, 2004, 4:00:22 PM, I wrote: AJ> Any problems I've had with TB! until now have been annoying. Today it AJ> seems to have *lost* emails! AJ> When collecting emails just now, it received all those waiting on the AJ> server (POP3) and then appeared to hang when logging off the se

  1   2   >