On 03/02/2011 15:51, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> There are no more unallocated unicast IPv4 /8s in the IANA IPv4 Address Space
> Registry.
Now may be an excellent moment for a rousing rendition of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
Paul.
On 15/04/2011 11:34, Adrian Kennard wrote:
> Thomas Mangin wrote:
>>> I recall having to translate Thomas's IX talk in Cannes so that the
>>> French
>>> people could understand it..
>>
>> Is today some kind of French bashing day for you blokes in the UK ? :)
>> Or is it everyday in here ?
>
> I th
lock on TPB or anything else; something has been done and the
general population can see that something has been done.
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
On 13/02/2013 11:40, David Wilkinson wrote:
I think the unsubscribe link is broken as well since it claims it would be
unsubscribing supp...@communigator.co.uk, I would have expected it to be the
uknof mailing list email address.
We could unsubscribe them too, as a public service...
Paul.
kTalk) - India (BSNL).txt> <28.03-UK (BT) - India
(BSNL).txt> <31.03-India (BSNL) - UK (BT).txt>
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Paul Thornton
reach.com <http://s1.dma.dxb.ixreach.com>
(91.196.184.67) 158.645 ms 159.185 ms 159.498 ms
FYI most routes are now back albeit on alternative paths so there
shouldn't be much ongoing issue to the region..
Steve
On 2 April 2013 12:57, Paul Thornton mailto:p...@prt.org>>
wrote:
Co-inc
On 18/04/2013 22:14, Debbie Casey wrote:
Dear Keith and co,
Great venue, topical speakers and very well organised.
Thank you very much.
Add to that mhanks to all who made yesterday possible - the new venue
worked out well (after we'd debugged their connectivity).
Paul.
Forwarded from the outages list as this may have more relevance for
those of us on this side of the Atlantic. Apologies for HTML and/or
attachments/links to L3 website - this is how it was posted to outages,
and without it the formatting goes wrong.
Another datapoint in the "when groups of In
Forwarded from the outages list as this may have more relevance for
those of us on this side of the Atlantic.
Another datapoint in the "when groups of Internet techies meet up and
socialise, bad stuff happens nearby" experiment :-)
Paul.
Original Message
Subject:Re
Hi
As Simon said on NANOG, in the UK it is rare that a normal office
building would have that sort of connectivity available to tenants.
Typically, if a landlord / managing agents want to offer Internet
connection to their clients, they will do something like get 100M from a
provider and spl
g
and technical mailing lists, "I'm not interested, thanks" does not
work.
Maybe you can pay someone some money and never hear from them again.
Wrong List :)
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
/100/1000
(regardless of the speed of the fibre input SFP).
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
Ebay which may be another option for you.
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
On 20/01/2014 13:52, Emma Frost wrote:
Well the bill for the VAT is £20,820. I believe the retail value of the
equipment was given as approx $170k. Is there some kind of limit for how
much a donation can be worth?
Unfortunately the donation aspect is irrelevant to HMRC.
You've imported $170k w
Hi folks,
Does anyone know if AS1299 support a BGP blackhole community? They
don't seem to publish one but I'm wondering if it is an undocumented
feature ... if so, can some kind person share with me please?
Thanks
--
Paul.
On 24/03/2014 16:35, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 24/03/2014 16:31, Paul Thornton wrote:
Does anyone know if AS1299 support a BGP blackhole community? They don't
seem to publish one but I'm wondering if it is an undocumented feature ...
if so, can some kind person share with me please?
27;ve all had times where we've had to put them
in the network somewhere. Be prepared to blame a media converter first
without much evidence if you're going to use it.
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
Hi all,
A bit of a long shot, but...
We have a 40KVA APC Symmetra here at our office which hasn't been
working properly for a while, and it has finally decided that enough is
enough and it doesn't want to work at all. A UPS that drops the load as
soon as the mains power fails is of limited u
Nat
https://nat.ms
+44 7531 750292
On 4 Jun 2014 07:52, "Paul Thornton" mailto:p...@prt.org>>
wrote:
Hi all,
A bit of a long shot, but...
We have a 40KVA APC Symmetra here at our office which hasn't been
working properly for a while, and it has finally decid
On 04/06/2014 13:10, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Personally, I like the analog ones. :-)
http://www.inovasolutions.com/network-clocks/
-Bill
We have one of the ontime analogue ones here - bonus points for doing
NTP over IPv6 too.
Paul
On 04/06/2014 13:37, James Bensley wrote:
On 4 June 2014 13:23, wand...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I need someone with actual bandwidth in Bournemouth as opposed to hauling
back to another POP.
No one has "actual bandwidth" (what ever that may be) in Bournemouth,
no C4L or Virgin, they are going to b
IIRC, the root cause was/is the fact that a dialer is always 'up' even
if PPP has failed.
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
Hi folks,
Yes, I know, I'm asking about VM - so all bets are off. However...
We've just had a 'BOS Technical Support Analyst' at VM come back on a
customer's open fault with the following statement:
"Also a lot of our customers are not aware that you bandwidth is not
bio-directional. For e
Hi
If anyone has contact details for someone who has enable on routers in
AS8419 can they let me have it please? Getting past the helpdesk droids
proving troublesome mid-outage.
Thanks,
Paul.
On 13/02/2015 14:42, Peter Knapp wrote:
So you asked them, they said only blackhole and you thought "I know I'll ask
everyone on a forum if their response was a lie"
Really?
It isn't unreasonable. Perhaps I'd phrase it "I know, I'll ask everyone
on a forum if they have any further inside in
Afternoon folks,
I'm trying to map a PPP username in the Cisco AAA Session MIB to the
virtual-access interface in the Interfaces MIB. And not really getting
anywhere.
What I'm trying to do is do a real-time mapping of PPP username to the
dynamic virtual-access interface's ifIndex - so when
Hi,
On 20/04/2015 13:06, Sandy Breeze wrote:
Hi Paul,
For scaling reasons I thought it was advisable to restrict SNMP access to
virtual-interfaces (and disable full VAI creation). But if you have it
enabled anyway, don¹t you have access to: casnVaiIfIndex?
The casnVaiIfIndex entry for all of t
On 12/06/2015 12:11, Chris Russell wrote:
On 12/06/2015 12:06, Giles Coochey wrote:
So How widespread have the Level3 issues been this morning?
Wide. Also looks like Telecom Malaysia announcing the majority of the
DFZ may not be helping...
DFZ is a mess, but is slowly improving...
Repor
Morning,
On 14/09/2015 09:08, William Waites wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:57:28 +0100, James Bensley said:
> The media companies (seeing as they seem to be exclusivly US
> based in my experiance) have no legal leg to stand on and no
> proof. I'm not going to offend my customer
On 14/09/2015 15:16, Mark Stokes wrote:
Who needs cheap transit when peering clearly is the way to go.
You don't have the entire routing table @LINX yet :)
Paul.
Evening folks,
I found myself troubleshooting an odd problem Thursday and Friday (not
helped at all by Sheffield's hospitality over the previous two nights) -
several employees of a customer have all had issues in the past few
months getting VPNs connected reliably. A colleague was on-site at
On 04/11/2015 08:42, James Bensley wrote:
On 31 Oct 2015 13:17, "Neil J. McRae" mailto:n...@domino.org>> wrote:
>
> +1 - you can filter ASes but someone can still send a crazy as path
with valid ASes and cause you chaos.
>
> Neil.
>
> Sent from my iPad
Are you suggesting that people shoul
Morning folks,
I'm sure those involved are busy firefighting, but the JANET DoS attack
seems to have ratcheted up a gear today, or certainly the end user
impact has.
The site I'm currently at seems to have external connectivity but 90%
loss on DNS. Does anyone know if they are filtering udp
Evening all
We've recently brought up a new L2TP connection with a provider, but an
initial test line that's just been installed isn't working. In testing
the L2TP part worked fine between us, and we successfully authenticated
test logins from them.
I'm not even seeing any action at all on
Hi
On 22/01/2016 21:18, James Bensley wrote:
It kind of depends on what you are seeing;
On the CPE are you seeing the line in sync? Assuming you are, are you
seeing authentication requests from the BRAS node? Again I assume yes.
Line in sync, no PPP. No auth requests at all seen at our end.
Hi,
On 21/03/2016 16:16, Gareth Bryan wrote:
Hi All,
Just looking for output from a 3356 session in Manchester for any of our
prefixes (e.g 62.121.0.0/19)
A customer of mine has 3356 transit in Manchester, but is default-only
so table contents aren't really that valid.
I can help in the o
Hi All,
Apologies for hitting both lists at once. I'm somewhat concerned that
cross-posting will cause a massive disturbance in the force. Or the
routing table. Or both...
Thanks for the numerous notifications both via E-mail and social media
in the past few weeks.
No, I don't have a com
Hi all
We have a customer who needs 50M or 100M from Jersey back to London or
Manchester. I know when I last looked into pricing like this, the
answer was "lots".
Does anyone here have a PoP on the island who can do a pseudowire back
to the mainland?
Ta
Paul.
Thanks to everyone for the contact details / tips etc. received both on
and off-list. I've passed them over to the relevant people to follow up.
--
Paul Thornton
On 26/07/2016 12:57, Clarke, Adam (IT Enterprise Services) wrote:
Hi,
I’m after a list of ISPs that are in the Spring Park (Corsham) Ark Data
Centre.
I have a customer requirement that needs a 100Mbps transit feed fairly
urgently.
Is there a list somewhere of current providers in the fac
On 28/07/2016 08:51, David Simmons wrote:
Surely the funniest thing we have ever heard is BT not having single POP
diversity?
At the risk of being flamed, we all know that's clearly not the case.
And no, Neil has not paid me to say that :)
I'm sure there are a lot of clueful folks at BT who
Hi folks,
I have been doing some work with a small ISP customer around sourcing
off-net DDoS scrubbing to protect one of their downstream access
customers. I don't really have a feel for the ballpark pricing for this
kind of service though.
We've been quoted around £20/meg/month[1] of scrub
Afternoon folks,
I'm locked into something of a battle of wills with the RIPE NCC at the
moment, trying to establish a new LIR. This is something I've done for
UK companies plenty of times in the past with no problems at all.
Apparently, they now[1] reject certificates of registration that a
Hi Nigel,
Thanks for offering.
On 02/09/2016 13:25, Nigel Titley wrote:
On 02/09/16 12:37, Paul Civati wrote:
On 2 Sep 2016, at 12:27, Paul Thornton wrote:
Does anyone know what, precisely, one needs to get from Companies House to
satisfy this new bit of Dutch bureacracy? I can'
On 02/09/2016 17:24, Nigel Titley wrote:
Paul
I've already kicked off a request to find out what's happening. I
suspect it's a simple misunderstanding of some sort, that's what these
things usually boil down to. They can't possibly really want what you
think they do.
Indeed, I'd hope that they
On 02/09/2016 17:25, Nigel Titley wrote:
On 02/09/16 15:15, Neil J. McRae wrote:
It's RIPE NCC - what did you expect? An organisation that is sensible and
efficient? - or one that creates regulation and things to check for zero value?
Rather like a certain large telco ;-)
Oooh. Handb
Afternoon folks,
On 02/09/2016 17:03, Paul Thornton wrote:
I would be keen to understand why there has been a change - and more
importantly, what supposed problem this solution is meant to fix.
Involving Athina in a ticket around the simple task of establishing an
LIR seems overkill, but that
On 19/09/2016 21:57, Gavin Henry wrote:
Evening all,
If anyone knows either of these, tell them to go away!
Personally, I'd quite like to interpret "go away" as "expunged from the
Internet permanently". I've just added them to our relay blacklist.
Anybody else had 3 emails from them today
Hi all
ICANN have postponed the change to the DNSSEC KSK - it was scheduled for
11 October (to nicely coincide with the LoNAP AGM).
Full details here:
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-09-27-en
Paul.
Hi Keith,
On 28/09/2017 19:16, Keith Mitchell wrote:
On 09/28/2017 02:02 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:
ICANN have postponed the change to the DNSSEC KSK - it was scheduled for
11 October (to nicely coincide with the LoNAP AGM).
Full details here:
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-09-27
Afternoon all,
We have a bunch of xDSL lines with wholesale provider A, all of which
are delivered by BTW (no unbundling).
We're migrating them in chunks to wholesale provider B. Provider B has
LLU for ADSL and uses BTW for FTTC.
As a result, B can provide us with FTTC anywhere and ADSL wh
On 07/10/2017 12:38, Mike Reed wrote:
What's the incompatible product? It sounds like they are doing a cease
and re-provide..
I (possibly naively) assumed that the incompatible product was the
existing ADSL service. All of the FTTC lines we've migrated using the
same method have come across
A followup on this...
On 07/10/2017 12:28, Paul Thornton wrote:
When we try that, B says there is an incompatible product on the line
and they can't do anything about that. We need to talk to A to get it
removed. Great, but due to the glacial speeds at which this stuff
happens
On 25/10/2017 06:57, Simon Lockhart wrote:
Anyone with access to the Openreach tools can check this. Look also at ADSL
checkers which tell you which cabinet you're connected to (I think the BTW
one does). If it doesn't list a cabinet (PCP) number, then it's an EO line.
Thanks, I'd forgotten t
On 30/11/2017 11:33, Charl Tintinger wrote:
Hi,
Getting some quotes in the market for IPv4 address space.
Pricing seems to be circa £10 per IP now for /19 type size.
I have assisted in several purchases of IPv4 space for customers in the
last 12 months. I have come to a couple of conclusion
On 14/03/2018 18:48, Tom Hill wrote:
On 14/03/18 18:12, John Bourke wrote:
Does anyone know a broker with /21 of PI space for sale ? I can’t find any at
the moment ...
What's wrong with PA space?
There are currently 25x /21s offered for transfer on the RIPE transfer
listing service:
https:
rewall that can then be applied to
both customer and peer interfaces.
This could, of course, be scripted but I'm wondering if there isn't some
kind of magic that we can use to get the router to do it natively.
Thanks
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
Hi all
Does anyone have a sales contact at Dell for networking kit -
specifically (if it matters) S4100-ON series boxes? I just need to get
some indicative pricing and availability info, but would rather avoid
the generic Dell sales number if there is a better option.
Thanks
Paul.
On 04/03/2019 15:28, Paul Thornton wrote:
Hi all
Does anyone have a sales contact at Dell for networking kit -
specifically (if it matters) S4100-ON series boxes? I just need to
get some indicative pricing and availability info, but would rather
avoid the generic Dell sales number if there
Morning everyone,
Does anyone here in .ac.uk. land use Windows Server 2016 NPS for inbound
proxied RADIUS requests for their roaming Eduroam users?
I'm trying to deal with the fact that NPS doesn't handle anonymous outer
identities, the Eduroam support site has a FAQ entry for this with a
fi
Hi all,
We have an existing UK connectivity customer who has gained a new office
in Dublin.
Who do I talk to in Ireland who can provide a local tail to this office,
and backhaul it to hand off to us in a Manchester DC? Not high speed -
100M will be OK.
Eircom seem to have a Manchester PoP
are not working as they should. I've been grappling
with this for some time now and really want it sorted!
Any assistance would be very gratefully received.
Thanks,
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
y Street, Manchester M3 3JE
*From:* uknof on behalf of Paul
Thornton
*Sent:* Friday, October 4, 2019 12:18:25 PM
*To:* uk...@uknof.org.uk
*Subject:* [uknof] Talktalk wholesale xDSL radius session steering
Hi all,
Does anyone out there (a) have TTB
On 20/02/2020 11:57, Tom Bird wrote:
Morning,
Given the RFC for this is something like 20 years old now, but I still
see /30s being used by just about everyone, is there still a good
reason for this?
Prevention of customer confusion, mainly.
Where we control the CPE as a managed device, wh
thing? The only other times I've been involved with this has been for
very large orders where the OEM brands the product on behalf of the ISP
who is going to be using the router.
Ta,
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
Thanks for all of the replies folks.
I have a number of promising leads - it looks like our plan is to do the
sticky plastic swap for now, but handy to learn about people who can do
the metalwork if we want to go down that route.
Paul.
On 26/05/2020 14:39, Paul Bone wrote:
ISP A, for example, started up 2-3 years ago and received their /22
from RIPE but now, through growth they need more to service new
customers. They now have to pay a lot of money (in relative terms) to
obtain more IPv4 addresses. To pay for these IP addr
On 28/05/2020 16:16, Wojciech Lesiak wrote:
I am really surprised as I just did an upgrade
from 500Mbit to 1Gb.
It sounds to me like they are still limiting it to 500M somewhere.
I would be *very* surprised if any leased lines from any UK providers
behaved like the BTNet person told you (perh
Hi all,
Is there anyone here who is using Openreach's Dark Fibre X? Interested
to hear of experiences, pitfalls, overall how easy the process is etc.
Thanks
Paul.
On 18/09/2020 09:46, James Blessing wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 08:46, Paul Thornton <mailto:p...@prt.org>> wrote:
Is there anyone here who is using Openreach's Dark Fibre X? Interested
to hear of experiences, pitfalls, overall how easy the process is etc.
So, I&
On 20/09/2020 17:04, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
I'm curious about the technical feedback.. single ended testing.. I
presume that means a loop at the far end then running a test on each
strand at the near end.. what artefacts would not be found?
(Noting that since they have to go to both ends to del
On 20/09/2020 16:02, I wrote:
I'm due to speak to our OR Solutions Manager tomorrow to get the whole
"Hey Mr CP, here's this product you can use" experience, and then
determine if it actually helps us more than hinders us. One can never
be certain...
Having now had that conversation, and
Hi all,
As usual, I'm trying to do something a bit odd.
Does anyone know of a DHCPv4 relay daemon that accepts requests from
downstream clients on the normal DHCP port, and forwards to a DHCP
server on an alternate port; and the reverse for replies?
For example, client sends out DISCOVER on
On 10/06/2022 14:36, Paul Mansfield wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 14:26, Paul Thornton wrote:
Does anyone know of a DHCPv4 relay daemon that accepts requests from
Thanks for the suggestions folks.
Can't really use another box as there's already a router in place -
convenient
On 11/06/2022 14:43, Matthew Newton wrote:
I thought we could do this in FreeRADIUS, but it seems not - only the
relay server could be set. Have put together a short patch[0] which
allows it to be changed. Maybe that helps?
After spending a couple of weeks being distracted by other unrelated
On 14/08/2023 22:54, Adrian Bolster wrote:
Hi,
Please would someone from Disney+ contact me off list? I believe we
have a geo-location issue…
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but good luck with that. Disney+
are IMO the worst of the content providers for dealing with geoloc
issues and
76 matches
Mail list logo
