Looks like 61819058 is the arxiv report.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can access them by going here:
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
And then searching on the dependent patents in turn:
61818553
61819058
61821914
flogged at the uspto.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks like 61819058 is the arxiv report.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can access them by going here:
http://portal.uspto.gov
61818553 looks like the december report (2012?)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
61821914 looks like subset of the published patent app.
So, I don't see anything signficantly new here, but there might be some
details lurking in the deltas
Looks like there are three related patents filed last year in May. I
wonder when we'll seem them pop up. Also, why did this patent show up
already? It was only filed in april of this year.
*Application Number**Filing Date**Patent Number*61818553May 2, 201361819058May
3, 201361821914May 10,
/init_events/Track_One.jsp
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks like there are three related patents filed last year in May. I
wonder when we'll seem them pop up. Also, why did this patent show up
already? It was only filed in april of this year
Jones, that's mostly true. It depends on what they're specifically
claiming though. with patents the devil is in the details.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The USPTO has an 18 month embargo on publication, which is* optional* and
not required - and
wherein the interior of the sealed vessel
is not preloaded with a pressurized gas when in an initial state before
activation of the heating element.
I am sure a POSITA could replicate that.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jones, that's mostly true
yeah, i'm a huge source of typos
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
. . . interior of the sealed vessel is not preloaded with a pressurized
gas when in an initial state before activation of the heating
Jones you need to look at the claims. The abstract / background / etc are
just context.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You say potato, I say potato…
But the main implications which stands out on first read – if we try to
interpret what is being
The COP etc is meaningless without replication or at the very worst - third
party verification.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan,
The report notes that they ignored the energy needed to heat the steam
beyond 100C and also underestimated the flow by
Interesting posts on e-cat world lately. It's a good point. If coal is
so cheap, than a cop of 3:1 for electricity - thermal isn't going to cut
it.
They're are going to need to be able to power the cat by coal itself or gas
and get a 3:1 thermal - thermal ratio.
, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Interesting posts on e-cat world lately. It's a good point. If coal is
so cheap, than a cop of 3:1 for electricity - thermal isn't going to cut
it.
They're are going to need to be able to power the cat by coal itself or
gas
home market here.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Interesting posts on e-cat world lately. It's a good point. If coal is
so cheap, than a cop of 3:1 for electricity - thermal isn't going to cut
it.
They're are going to need
of snow. I could really use a nice COP=3 heater. In cold weather
climates, even cold weather optimized heat pumps don't operate with a COP
over 3. There would be a nice home market here.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Interesting
that will
consume 1/3 of the gas to cover that base.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
For sure, but it isn't interesting to take electrical and do a 3:1 COP on
it. what's interesting is to take coal or gas and do a 3:1 COP on it.
But I
http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/28/news/economy/russia-oil-price-100-dollars-budget/
It's interesting to see that Russia's economy is based largely on oil.
If LENR+ were to be replicated in a credible way tomorrow, for example, in
some sort of device that didn't require external power to continue
Your theory kind of relies on Levi and Crew being frauds and liars...
Because Rossi wouldn't trust them to be incompetent.
Conspiracies of that nature just don't work except in the minds of nutjobs.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Vorticians…
We
, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Your theory kind of relies on Levi and Crew being frauds and liars...
Because Rossi wouldn't trust them to be incompetent.
Conspiracies of that nature just don't work except in the minds of nutjobs.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene
Yeah, well, obviously Tom Darden wants to get there first then so his
investment pays off. Why lie and say he doesn't care? It seems like
such a blatantly false statement.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
lol! Nice try, Jed.I applaud your contortions.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, well, obviously Tom Darden wants to get there first then so his
investment pays off.
Why is that obvious
sentiments.
Not putting selfish interest first is not that extraordinary, nor does it
mean there are no selfish interests.
But in the current climate it does seem extraordinary given the greed
present.
Yes, it is refreshing. Almost quaint.
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote
http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all
I was re-reading this, and I strongly agree with one of the comments.
“I don’t care who gets there first, how it happens,” he says. “I just want
to see it happen.”
The statement is
I don't care who gets there first. Not sure how you can possibly
interpret that any other way. Obviously he wants to be first otherwise
he'd give away the IP.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Blaze Spinnaker
*http://www.bizjournals.com
Or at the very least, he'd trust / take a chance that the patent office
will give him a patent.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't care who gets there first. Not sure how you can possibly
interpret that any other way. Obviously he
One thing I don't hear a lot of people discussing is the FUD generated by
cold fusion and hot fusion.
Industries are investing billions of dollars trying to make solar work.
Something that works today and is actually trying to solve global warming
and dangerous pollution.
Companies like Lockheed
Why would you want inflation adjusted? It works in your favor :)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:16 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course not. When suckers make bets like this with me I generally at
least demand treasury rates but Bruce was so spontaneous I didn't want to
spoil
http://www.3news.co.nz/world/scientist-claims-to-have-mastered-cold-fusion-2014101510
Sadly, terribly terribly ignorant.
Can they say hell on tv in Australia?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.3news.co.nz/world/scientist-claims-to-have-mastered-cold-fusion-2014101510
Sadly, terribly terribly ignorant.
Oh sorry, new zealand tv.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can they say hell on tv in Australia?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.3news.co.nz/world/scientist-claims-to-have-mastered
Did anyone pursue a share placement with Hydro Fusion? I had been thinking
about it but didn't sign the NDA that they sent me.
Amusingly, HydroFusion has no names on its website so that's obviously a
rather huge flag.
yeah, i sent out that correction... Just sayin'
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
wrote:
New Zealand is a different country from Australia.
Just saying.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www
They specifically say in the report the coils are the dark areas. I doubt
they're lying about that.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* ChemE Stewart
If you zoom in very closely on the hot reactor photos you can see the the
dark lines are of
Anyone following this?
http://forum.keshefoundation.org/forum/keshe-official/34787-breakthrough-in-the-world-of-science
It looks like they got up to 62T off of 10w of energy. They are live
streaming the entire thing.
interesting.
Interesting analysis, Jones. I agree there is a scenario such that the
current fuel he has is economically prohibitive which would be motivation
for him to mess with the results.
Another scenario is he simply doesn't want other people to replicate his
work just yet and is using these guys for
2. Mistake. This seems unlikely given the magnitude of the effect. On the
other hand mass spectroscopy is a difficult art. The people at Mitsubishi
and the National Synchrotron lab both saw pronounced isotopic shifts in
Iwamura's samples. The people at the NRL looked at those samples and saw
https://www.google.se/trends/explore?hl=en-GB#q=%22E-Cat%22date=11%2F2010%2050mcmpt=q
Sweden and Italy are the top two. Spike is similar to may report for 2013
Care to share where you saw this?
The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20 PM of 24 February 2014 by Andrea
Rossi who gradually
brought it to the power level requested by us. Rossi later intervened to
switch off the dummy, and in the
following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge
..that he had to do the ash extraction himself, why would have leave it in
the hands of the third party for so long? What keeps them from simply
cutting it apart and figuring out what's inside themselves?
If he felt he could trust them not to do that, why not trust them with
instructions on how
with tools so I guess it was
just an easy thing to do and the testers thought that they could monitor
it quite enough still to avoid cheating.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
..that he had to do the ash extraction himself, why would have
then, risking getting caught.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to
handle a lab saw?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
was very bizarre..
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to
handle a lab saw?
They did not compromise the integrity of anything
Darden knows what's inside the ecat. He has complete,
unfettered access. The same can not be said for Levi.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
*Our* company.
Exciting times!
He's not relying on some
:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I read somewhere that 70% of all papers are not able to be replicated. Or
something crazy like that.
Where did you read that, and what sort of papers did it refer to? I
believe I have read that studies in sociology have poor replication
Why would you say Levi knows what's in the cell? They specifically say
they don't know in the report.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't find Levi to be credible! I'm enthusiastic too and want to
believe, but Levi was a very poor choice
Michael Nelson, Alternate Discipline Leader for SLS Propulsion at NASA’s
Propulsion Research and Development Laboratory, notes, “I was impressed
with the work that was done to insure the measurements claiming a 3.2 to
3.6 COP were accurate. Aside from the fact that this could not have been
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/10/tom-darden-of-industrial-heat-comments-on-e-cat-test/
Of all the ones that I wanted to hear, was this. Tom Darden is not
speaking based on this report. He's obviously intimately familar with the
ecat, the 1mw install, and all the
is to make industrial heat and
industrial heat is made by coal… We don’t think any energy should be made
by coal, so that’s why I’m doing this. This could be a way to eliminate the
use of coal.”
*Our* company.
Exciting times!
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
Transmutation is a huge part of lenr. Spawar has published patents all
over it. I'm sure it's why the Nasa scientist is excited about it,
because he's seen it before and know it's likely true to a point.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
The Isotopic
transmutation years ago and everyone
chasing that empirical/theoretical dead-end. I hope people keep that in
mind before irrational exuberance sets in over this data. It's only the
beginning, not the destination.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com
.
Therefore, a need currently exists for a reproducible method and
corresponding system that can generate particles.
Sounds like transmutation to me...
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://coldfusionnow.org/transmutation-of-nuclear-waste-lenr-spawar
be harnessed. David Nagel is not quite as optimistic
as they are that industrial scale transmutation is possible, as you might
have known from his recent ICCF talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83DLfW2epzc
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote
Brad, I think part of the problem was control. When you use the hot cat
to actually heat something I suspect it messes with the ability to control
the reaction. The best they can do is let it radiate, which is why the
thermal cameras.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Brad Lowe
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/probability-is-now-45/
Based on http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
Exciting times!
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/probability-now-20
Mind blowing.This is a B.F.D.
Exciting times!!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Elforsks CEO: Let's move on with research on LENR
http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
google translation of swedish:
Elforsk takes now the
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2824558/infrastructure-management/could-ultra-cheap-clean-energy-be-just-around-the-corner-the-return-of-rossi-and-the-e-cat.html
Our good friend mark gibbs! Click on it! Many times!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2824558/infrastructure-management/could-ultra-cheap-clean-energy-be-just-around-the-corner-the-return-of-rossi-and-the-e
Good stuff, Harry,
Question - how do we know where they cut is representative of the fuel that
was injected? Maybe what they analyzed was primer.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:46 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The cranks served a purpose. It's always useful to have a sanity check.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Motl actually said that! Amazing. Quote:
One encouraging thing --
And for anyone who wants to suggest random anonymous internet posters are
responsible for the general censorship of Cold Fusion Please.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
The cranks served a purpose. It's always useful to have a sanity check
at 3:29 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/probability-is-now-27/
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28
Pomp makes a point though... the whole document is meaningless compared to
the ash measurement. Who cares about heat / input / blah blah lbah if
we're doing transumation without radiation.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems to be as Beaudette
point in the progress of humanity and all that we know.
I'm not betting my life though. There's a possibility, not that slim,
that he might actually have done it.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pomp makes a point though... the whole document
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I have to admit that it would be trivially easy for an apprentice magician
to construct a container into which you insert (say) white powder as fuel
and later on
straightforward. He either switched it out or he didn't. He's either a
liar or he isn't. It's pretty simple..
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm betting he's a fraud, simply because the probability of him doing
, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jed, it doesn't matter. If the ash is a fraud, Rossi is a fraud. Plain
and simple. I'm not interesting in debating the other aspects of the
experiment because of the complexities involved in calorimetry
Another possibility is that someone switched out the ash on Rossi to
discredit him However, I would have assumed that Rossi would have
complained about that immediately on his blog
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Blaze sed:
Jed, perhaps someone is trying to discredit Rossi and thought this was the
best way to do so.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
Here
http://www.xprize.org/terms-and-conditions
Which term specifically? Wall of text..
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex,
I am not sure if anybody talked about the terms and conditions
that is located at the ...very bottom of the
, claims they have rights in
Your Content or if Your Content otherwise violates the law.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.xprize.org/terms-and-conditions
Which term specifically? Wall
I don't get it. Isn't this just electrical charges dissipating into the
moisturized air? It's just the electricity radiating outwards.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
How about following Randy's lead. Why not use a small solar panel and
Awwwh. :(
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
This is a non story. Rossi has never claimed electricity. He claims
excess heat. Converting heat into electricity is hard to do at the
efficiencies he needs to be competitive.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Gasp..He is loosing me!
Courtesy
Yeah, sad how all the choral is dying in Kauai. Could have something to
do with all the sunscreen tourists slop on though.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:26 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Below is a link to a great video from our study on the Kauai Coral
Reef disease. Terry
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2014/07/02/dean-kamen-thinks-his-new-stirling-engine-could-power-the-world/?utm_campaign=techtwittersfutm_source=twitterutm_medium=social
With the Beacon 10, says Kamen, “you don’t have to feel guilty heating up
the pool.” That’s because of the highly
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/probability-is-now-27/
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry berry.joh
a negative.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as probability in reality.
I see..
On Sun, Jun
They could have decided they just wanted to put some time and space between
the swedish radio thing and their report.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
E-Cat world reporting another delay from the TIP testers... early autumn
Soon we will probably know a
http://www.theverge.com/2014/6/19/5824336/google-s-quantum-computer-just-flunked-its-first-big-test
The d-wave is a lot similar to Rossi. Basically devices being built
privately with no known science to explain why they do what they do .. and
lots of skeptics.
.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Going to start publishing updates on this blog
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/ rather than this mailing list.
Rossi is now at 30%
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote
I guess what your'e really saying is that God Does Not Play Dice.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing
Well, the great about BLP is that they make Rossi look credible.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com wrote:
The game changer is not Rossi but Black Light Power’s SunCell technology
which is now taking shape. Readers of Vo have been put off by seemingly
wild
In the macroscopic world, probabilities do not exist in the same sense
that atoms exist, or energy, or states of matter.
I suspect Schrodinger's cat would disagree with this statement. The
microscopic significantly influences the macroscopic world.
The eCat is a perfect example of this.
, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
In the macroscopic world, probabilities do not exist in the same sense
that atoms exist, or energy, or states of matter.
I suspect Schrodinger's cat would disagree with this statement. The
microscopic significantly
sit up and take notice simply because Rossi ain't a fraud,
as the common notion suggests.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another possibility is IH may have decided they don't want the world
competing with them, so they gave the researchers
Yeah, crazy stuff. I'm increasing the % here of Rossi being real to 40%
though on the account of the scientists speaking out. They sound confident.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
The oddest thing about this new affair it is that ecat's report
A reasonable point. They may report high, uncontrollable COP. The
isotopic analysis should stlll be be interesting though, if they actually
did it.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, crazy stuff
Unless they've already submitted a patent app for them.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Furthermore, pursuant to the new US patent laws, any technical tidbits
that these builders release to the public cannot be protected by patent.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at
scenario, but in reality it's just competitive with optimal Geothermal.
In this scenario, I consider the eCat not to have lived up to its promises
which is why my estimate is around 35%.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Decreasing the probability
perhaps with Rocket Fuel in the best
case scenario, but in reality it's just competitive with optimal Geothermal.
In this scenario, I consider the eCat not to have lived up to its promises
which is why my estimate is around 35%.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna
wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Start shorting any of the alt energy plays.
The challenge with short selling is when to start? Immediately? A few
weeks or months after news of cold fusion is starting to spread? (Note
that rumors
to establish?
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric, take a look at this:
http://www.google.ca/trends/explore#q=lenr%2C%20andrea%20rossi%2C%20e-catcmpt=q
If we decide the report is fully credible and those graphs make
historical highs, I think
Are you here to make a buck on fellow vorticians?
Yes, but I'd like to think everyone here can share in the wealth if they
were paying attention. Certainly they deserve it.
Some people though, I guesss, for whatever bizarre reasons I'll never
understand - profoundly believe they don't deserve
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
If we decide the report is fully credible and those graphs make historical
highs, I think that's a good time to short.
I'm less
Here's a possible portfolio so far:
FSLR Put Options (2 years): 60%
XOM Put Options (2 years): 20%
CPST: 10%
CYPW: 10%
Entry will occur on a combination of google trends and when these equities
make coordinated movements that aren't influenced by other factors such as
general market conditions.
and sterling
type devices.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a possible portfolio so far:
FSLR Put Options (2 years): 60%
XOM Put Options (2 years): 20%
CPST: 10%
CYPW: 10%
Entry will occur on a combination of google trends and when
% CYPW , and 20% whatever else presents itself as an opportunity such as
publicly traded companies that sell desalination plants.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a possible portfolio so far:
FSLR Put Options (2 years): 60%
XOM Put
I'm going to use this subject thread for ideas I have for my eCat Porfolio.
Basically investment opportunities which will profit if the report comes
out to be a full throated vindication of Rossi.
HydroFusion - interesting, but very very weird. You'd think he'd ask for
money AFTER the report
This is not actually a cold fusion scenario. These are top-notch
scientists doing excellent, if difficult, work.
Yeah, there is a special place in hell reserved for this guy. Everyone
should post a comment on his blog.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Danny Ross Lunsford
Or you can email him: joel.achenb...@washpost.com
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
This is not actually a cold fusion scenario. These are top-notch
scientists doing excellent, if difficult, work.
Yeah, there is a special place in hell
Hat tip to e-catworld. They've been doing some very strong investigative
reporting on eCat lately.
http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi-e-cat-hydro-fusion-cashing-in-before-the-collapse/
I have no idea what to make of this, TBH.
I agree though, why didn't Mats wait for the report?
Maybe he
201 - 300 of 666 matches
Mail list logo
