One thing I can add to McKubre's report that he left open is a response
from Dr. Parkhomov to MFMP when asked about the power input to the heater
coil.
Dr. AP:
*Standard 50Hz AC [*presumably variable voltage*] with no other frequency
stimulation/wave chopping was used*
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at
When analyzing the Parkhomov image, one thing you should note is that he
wound his reactor with a Ni-Cr (type-c) ribbon wire (not round) having a
width of about 2.5mm and a gap of 0.5mm.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jones--
I observed
Dave,
Try this: http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue120/russian.html
Bob
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:31 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I am having difficulty finding a copy of the report by Dr. McKubre for
some reason and wonder if someone would post a direct link.
. It is worth additional experiments and data taking, all
of which will require good seal technology.
MFMP is beginning to get feedback from Dr. Parkhomov.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
CB Sites--
Check out the following for LiAlH4
Parkhomov starts with a 10mm OD alumina tube with a 5mm ID bore (so the
wall of the tube is 2.5mm thick). He plugs both ends with an alumina rod
and cement with the fuel inside. He hasn't said what cement he uses to
hermetically seal the plugs in the tubing, but he does say that it is a
hard
Parkhomov's alumina tube has a wall thickness of 2.5mm and then he has 4-8
mm of alumina cement on top of that. I don't think any 3.6keV photons, if
produced in the reaction, would make it though that mass at a measurable
level above background. Parkhomov uses an SI-8B pancake tube with a large
Having worked with STM in the past, I can tell you they are a high quality,
high volume IC design and manufacturing company. I believe their primary
interest is for self-powered ICs. I believe they are interested in LENR at
a micron scale as block to put on future ICs for electrical power.
guidance.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Parkhomov starts with a 10mm OD alumina tube with a 5mm ID bore (so the
wall of the tube is 2.5mm thick). He plugs both ends with an alumina rod
and cement with the fuel inside. He hasn't said what cement
, Jan 1, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The first attempt did use a Cotronics Resbond 919, I think. These
alumina cements are not hermetic. That's why glass frit seals are being
examined - they are hermetic.
Ceramics, including aluminas, that are proton conductors are intentionally
doped in the grains with metals designed to provide a chemical transport of
hydrogen ions through the body, primarily at the grain boundaries (as I
understand it). The CoorsTek AD-998 alumina is not designed for proton
before the high pressure formed.
With this long alumina test tube (closed one end), it is possible to heat
one end hot to form the seal while the small charge of fuel is kept cool in
a water bath at the other end. This may be the next trial at sealing.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:24
See inline below ...
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø I think the heater is a heater; and Kanthal as the heater wire
has nothing to do with it. We now believe that Rossi may have used a SiC
heater element and that also has
See inline below ...
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø JB: Then you are mistaken. The purity is immaterial – the
porosity is everything. Of course, if MFMP used a fused tube then that is
another design flaw.
Ø BH
, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
What puzzles me the most is why such a small amount of nickel is not
completely vaporized by an emission of that much heat. Again, this
suggests
See inline below ...
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø None of these substrates are porous.
That may not be true for even the specialty material CoorsTek 998, but
clearly 96% is porous and in fact anything less than 100
live on youtube.
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on analysis of Lugano and Parkhomov work, excess heat begins at
about 950C. The MFMP dogbone core was measured to be over 1200C and no
excess heat was found.
As I said, I have a feeling that is too hot. I think
Ryan cemented a type-B platinum thermocouple though the center of the
plug. So he had actual data on the core temperature which got to about
1200C. The thermocouple at the surface only reported getting to about 850C
at the same time. Parkhomov measured his temperature in between - on the
end
from the plug in a bunch. The next focus will be on the seal.
Bob Higgins
to ask
what cement he used to seal his reactor. We are also looking at ways to
test the seals that we make.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, Replication fails. They had the dog bone so hot the steel
are right, it is very nice of them - AND - Bob is a good negotiator.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I though that MFMP was buying that camera. Maybe its just good customer
service.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bob
which should be noted.
This is not a trivial question - when errors are exponentially multiplied
by a fourth power.
*From:* Jones Beene
BTW – does anyone know the model # of the Optris camera used in Lugano ?
*From:* Bob Higgins
The original plan was to buy an Optris camera
The color of the MFMP dogbone and the Lugano hotCat are more complicated
than what you would expect from blackbody radiation. Both devices had
internal heaters at higher temperature than the surface of the ribbed
ceramic convection tube. At visible wavelengths alumina transmits a good
percentage
, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
These effects conspire to make a simply taken picture taken nearly
worthless in determination of temperature for this style of device.
How about the color as perceived
jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
Because of the porosity of the alumina, the ceramic is a reddening (low
pass) filter, so the light from the much hotter internal heater coils will
be reddened as it is transmitted. . . .
Ryan had a follow-up comment
Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø Being opaque, it means that the Optris camera was NOT measuring the
higher internal temperature of the hotCat reaction core or heater coil, but
just the surface.
Bob, wait a second … just today - in an earlier post you said (correctly
for
the important tests when the camera is available.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø The alumina transmission cuts off between 3-4 microns… So, unless the
Optris has an unexpected sensitivity to light shorter than 6 microns
objective was not replication of the original Patterson
Cell, but to learn from them what can be applied to other Ni-H LENR.
I have every reason to believe the original Patterson Cell results were
true and correct.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
The Motorola deal fell through because Patterson wanted to retain more
control of his technology . . .
He was a fool. He told me he wanted a 100% market share. I said
As I recall, the deal was $10M, spread over various milestones of
development.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
If it makes any difference, Jed confided in me this whole story when it
happened. I found it appalling. Patterson wanted the $1M from
Brightness depends on how much light is in the visible range. What is
happening is that as the device gets hotter, a greater percentage of the
light falls in the visible range, AND, a greater total amount of radiative
energy is being emitted. Both are going on at the same time. It gets
bright
Hello fellow Vorts,
MFMP is now hosting a live Google Hangouts meeting to discuss the dogbone
project - status and plans. If you wish, you may attend using this live
link:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYdjGS1897WJvyn7F-lecxcv214L2xLgKrIcX8F2Wx7hZSPlbw
Bob Higgins
Just so my answer is not mistaken, let me say that the MFMP replica will be
exactly the same size as the Lugano hotCat. It will have convection fins
on the outside of the convection tube just like the Lugano hotCat.
Ryan Hunt of HUG has made excellent progress in casting the convection
surface
the heaters fail.
The other stuff (hotCat heater type) is interesting, but completely
irrelevant to the Lugano test results or to our replica dummy test.
Bob Higgins
The main heater coil will be completely encased in alumina to keep away the
air (O2). It looks like we will insert the inner coil inside the alumina
heater tube and then will use alumina cement to close off the ends from
air, so the only air that it is exposed to is that which is in the volume
-ray), which would not
have been absorbed immediately at the source. This would have allowed the
core to remain cooler than the resistively heated experiment now in
progress at MFMP.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø
Jones,
I don't know where you have gotten this data, but I am working with MFMP on
this and have not seen any such data. There are 2 heaters being
developed. One will model the coil that was used to heat the internal
reactants - this is what the Lugano team applied electrical power to to
heat
in the Lugano hotCat was not capable of delivering over about 1kW
of input heat. So if the hotCat was really putting out over 2.5kW of heat
to get it to 1400C, then there was definitely substantial gain. We will
know in January.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jones Beene jone
My mentor used to tell me: The best things are invented by those who don't
know it can't be done.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
Beside what you say, there is some common error.
This is to imagine that education can help people be more
Look about half-way down this CNN article:
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1187686?ref=feeds%2Fnewsiest
Bob
is gray.
B-type uses platinum for one of the wires, making it quite expensive. Note
the long lead lengths of the wires in the photo.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
From
, not in electrical
production. It is 28F here this morning and we just had our first dusting
of snow. I could really use a nice COP=3 heater. In cold weather
climates, even cold weather optimized heat pumps don't operate with a COP
over 3. There would be a nice home market here.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Nov 5
be a nice home market here.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Interesting posts on e-cat world lately. It's a good point. If coal
is so cheap, than a cop of 3:1 for electricity - thermal isn't going to
cut it.
They're are going
temperature controller from eBay.
Bob Higgins
From the other pictures, it is pretty clear that Rossi is using a sheathed
k-type thermocouple with the hotCat. Because this thermocouple is not
rated to operate at the temperatures that the reactor convection tube was
supposedly operating, it appears that Rossi had placed (by design) the
as a check of his math; and I suspect there is an error in his
math or in how he has setup his model.
Bob Higgins
Since MFMP is building a replica of the IH reactor as shown in the Lugano
test, one of the proposals I have made is to begin with a single-phase
dummy reactor for primary purpose of gaining data on the temperature /
convection behavior. I propose that the heater be capable of driving the
alumina
will cause the voltage to be averaged and the resulting voltage sample will
be an average voltage (RMS is explicitly NOT needed). Here are the
equations. I hope I got them right this time and I hope the image gets
through to Vortex (it is small).
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Bob Higgins
drive change with their
step up in power. That appears to be a strong indication of core gain
that should not be present when in the dummy mode.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 28, 2014 10:04 am
Subject
What you say, Dave, is entirely true and always pragmatically wrong. Most
DAQ systems do not sample simultaneously and have an input capacitance that
provides averaging. Thus, you will always be reading average current
between samples and average voltage. Computing power from average current
I have no first hand knowledge one way or the other [this was not my
assertion]. I believe Dr. McKubre to be an outstanding researcher and have
no reason to believe this escaped his attention. Even if it did, it would
only be a minor error and does not alter conclusions.
It will make a
I hate to say this, but what you say is absolutely wrong. You could only
do as you describe if the voltage being averaged is the RMS voltage. You
cannot take the average voltage and multiply it by the average current to
get average power. For example, suppose that the voltage was
and assess the impact of
the AC on the measurement of power.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, a watt meter, not a volt meter. Yes, you can, and the instrument
makers do. All high-quality, high-powered wattmeters use calorimetry
could use a spectrum analyzer. If you have high
frequency components that can create errors, you get an instrument that
samples with a shorter period.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote
waveform additions.
If you have reservations about what I have stated I strongly suggest that
you put together a Spice model. That will prove that what I am saying is
right on target.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l
its
attachment to the inside of the tube, and it was there was random junk slag
from the reactions. So the ash cannot be said to have evolved from the
input powder, which itself was not the active fuel.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be
wrote
uptake than the Ni by itself. Once the Li is a thin
alloy film on the Ni particle surfaces which are catalyzed to produce a
LENR reaction, the Li may then be a participant in the LENR in condensed
matter form as opposed to being a participant in vapor phase form.
Bob Higgins
eric.wal...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, October 18, 2014 8:23 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]: Gettering in the Lugano IH reactor
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Once the Li is a thin alloy film on the Ni particle surfaces which
that the
tubercle nano-surface was still in place after days of 1400C operation. Any
ideas?
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
As someone who has first hand experience working with micro-scale
carbonyl Ni powder, and treating these powders
of the reactor sustain a temperature of
1420C if the nickel particles are cooler that that temperature.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The left side (in Figure 1) 45-50mm of the reactor are much cooler than
the heated core between the insulated
to the experiment and see the effects of the
changes.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Bob--
Thanks for that clarification about the melting of small Ni particles.
Are there any compounds or alloys of Ni that would not melt or sinter below
to keep them from sintering into a solid bulk at 500C. What
I do is sugar-coat (with Fe2O3 nanopowder) the particles and this keeps
them totally sintering together.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg
. These are
not active themselves, just a marker of the thermochemical processing. I
have seen these myself. These do not melt like nanoscale features.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Higgins: Even these 4-10 micron scale nickel particles will sinter
into a porous mass
support a magnetic field enhancement.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You are close to my thinking. However,what the micro particles produce is
not x-rays but coherent magnetism at extreme strength.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg
Tubercles is a nebulous description. You could call those features
tubercles, but I do not. They are not tubes at all. I have seen tubes
(hence my belief that I saw tubercles in my powder and they were at
larger scale (pictures are in my paper). Only Rossi can say which he
intended as
are the main objections to a SPP modality?
Jones
*From:* Bob Higgins
… Think about it like a microwave oven (only x-rays instead of
microwaves). The oven walls don't initially get hot. The food inside gets
hot from the microwave absorbtion and the IR from the food then heats up
the walls
Note that the Figure 12 of the Lugano report does not say when the photos
were taken. It only says during the test. The pictures could have been
taken while the device was in dummy test mode, while the device was heating
up, while the device was cooling down. The report does not say what
at 9:27 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Note that the Figure 12 of the Lugano report does not say when the
photos were taken. It only says during the test. The pictures could
have been taken while the device was in dummy test mode, while the device
was heating up, while
It is not clear from the report exactly how much ash was extracted from the
reactor. In the SEM of the 2 ash particles on page 45 in Appendix 3,
particle 2 is silica - known to be in the grain boundaries of alumina. In
96% alumina, there are 4% of other oxides and and in 99.8% alumina, there
are
I believe a book has been written about this. It was handed out at
ILENR-12 at William Mary College. It may have been written by Bob Pike.
I posited that many of the minerals found at plate boundaries were created
via LENR as I recall.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:07 AM, David Roberson
radiating tube. They serve no other function. The wires don't go through
these and they do not seal the ends. They are just supports.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I believe
I believe the ends are completely sealed with a compound like the Vitcast
1400 INS-H. I also think the space between the inner and radiating tube is
probably filled with this same compound. You don't want air flowing in
there in case there are cracks in the alumina adhesive put over the heater
Dave, that was my first thought too, but in going over the construction of
the heater coils, it turned out to be a pain to deal with the heater wire
cross-overs. You would not do this just because you were planning to
connect the array to a 3-phase supply. You could simply have an array of
3N,
a proper wires configuration to close the
rotating magnetic field formed by the 3 phases current.
Arnaud
--
*From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* jeudi 16 octobre 2014 17:05
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Engineering
that each resistor wire is terminated into a single
external wire and I fail to see why that would be difficult to do. My
visualization might be impaired!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 12:41 pm
). In this configuration the
Ni and Li plasma can’t get out of the confinement and the 3 phases give
also a rotation to this field. But I’m not an expert in magnetic
confinement and how to achieve it.
--
*From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* jeudi 16 octobre
supply needed to reproduce the eCat
effect? The cold eCat don’t use a 3phases power supply but Rossi could have
used magnet inside the cold eCat (Samarium cobalt magnet).
--
*From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* jeudi 16 octobre 2014 22:31
One thing we can be pretty sure of is that any Ni in this reactor at
1300-1400C will have no nano-features. The nano-scale portions melt at
about half the temperature of the bulk material. So what would happen is
that if there was Ni with nano-scale features, these features would melt
before the
encapsulated with a
high alumina cement. Maybe the ends are terminated in inconel for
interconnection.
Bob Higgins
a...@well.com wrote:
I now think the general structure is more like this :
http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/hotcat_141014_1_010.png
See http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_hotcat_oct2014_141014b.php in my other
thread for details
--
*From: *Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg
I believe the ends, between the central tube and the outer 2 cm hot tube,
are filled in with a refractory cement. In fact, that whole space, and
maybe not the ends could be filled in to help improve the thermal
conductivity. Most importantly it should keep out the air that could
oxidize the
I believe that Ni particles will not work once melted - just intuition,
because I don't buy the neutron stripping yet. If we take a leap of faith
and say that the central reactor core alumina tube is coated with particles
sintered to its inside (like a catalytic converter for example), we don't
temperature insulated mounting system?
- Why do we think the 3-phase drive is used?
- What else?
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
1% lithium in 1g fuel, so 0.01g, boils at 1342°C. At 1 bar,1342°C would
fill about 180mL volume
to the walls of the reactor vessel. What was tested
as ash is likely inert or random left-over inert slag in the reactor.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Recall that the bulk results show 57% Li-6 enrichment, vs. 92% surface
enrichment. I
. This powder
probably has sintered itself to the inside of the inner alumina tube, where
there will be direct thermally conductive contact - almost like a thick
film paste on a substrate.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:21 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Bob
added.
I can imagine Rossi essentially thick film coating his active Ni powder
onto the inside of the central alumina tube as part of creating the
reactor. Perhaps this would also include an alpha alumina washcoat that
would render the alumina impermeable to hydrogen.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Oct 14
for this too.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Sorry – but this reactor is made of alumina – which is a proton conductor.
Beta alumina is among the best proton conducting ceramics but you would
never use any form of alumina if you wanted
The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe. It
appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
powder I have been working with. The LiAlH4 means that Rossi is using a
hydride supplying only H2 and not D.
Bob Higgins
) to help excite his
reaction. Yet, since there is mention that the reaction will continue in
the OFF mode (but they didn't use that), it is clear that these excitations
are not required to sustain the reaction.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote
transmutation is probably less probable than what Norman Cook proposes.
Rossi apparently raves about Norman's theory.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Er,
s/Ni68/Ni62/g
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson [mailto:vortex-h
be nano-scale and
still operate at a temperature that would otherwise sinter powders of that
scale. I don't think the zeolite itself otherwise contributes to the LENR.
I would be happy to have someone with greater chemical background
straighten me out if these understandings are wrong.
Bob Higgins
Sorry about your caffeine deficit, but 10g of Ni doesn't cost more than a
barrel of oil. A kilogram of Ni powder I use was sent to me as a sample.
No one would sample 100 barrels of oil. Ni is cheap.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
IOW 10 grams of nickel
sinter into larger particles at high temperature (600C). If
nano-Ni was found to be required, it will be painful to make something work
at high temperature for long periods. Nano-Ni might be OK for hand warmers.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote
uses this technique to expose nano features after partial
sintering by oxidation/reduction with a final step of reduction. I start
with larger particles, add nano-Fe2O3, and then go through stages of
thermal oxidation and reduction.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:01 PM, mix...@bigpond.com
catalysts for the hotCat as
part of getting it up to higher temperature. Then he added his mouse to
improve the COP. I think the mouse was a first stage using his original
recipe (likening Rossi to Colonel Sanders :) ).
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:59 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote
for photon
transaction.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Bob, Eric
Actually – if you remember from TP1, the Swedes did test the powder with
XRF.
They did not report any UV signature. They should have if Mills reaction
is involved as you
, the catalyst will still absorb and re-emit the input photon or
fluoresce in longer wavelengths. What you would really like to see is
photons going into the catalyst and no energy coming out at the same or
longer wavelength. This is an exceedingly hard test to make with
unequivocal results.
Bob
the theories describing f/H
say there can be no direct photon transactions. If the theory is wrong,
then there is no basis for f/H states to begin with and you have no story
at all for where the 55 eV came from.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From
reactor vessel (as shown in the Penon report) and seal its ends.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
NMR is caused by the vibration of the non-zero spin vector of a nucleus.
This vibrating nuclear spin produces a vibrating magnetic field.
The point
be killing everyone around the
reactor. Any few neutrons detected externally are definitely a useful clue
about internal reactions, but fortunately few neutrons are ever detected.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:57 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
A small diameter membrane to allow
be prevented from escaping from Rossi's hotCat by the hermetic stainless
steel reactor enclosure acting as a Faraday cage. There will be no
propagating RF escaping from the Rossi's reactor vessel. There is only the
possibility of low frequency evanescent fields escaping.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 3
501 - 600 of 777 matches
Mail list logo
