On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different. It is a
good development. Go Rossi Go.
It is just one more extravagant claim without one tiny shred of proof.
I wonder if the $10 refill includes the self destruct mechanism or if
that's perhaps an extra cost option.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi
January 12th, 2012 at 5:42 PM
Dear Hanz Jager:
The fact that NASA is trying to copy my work honours me. But their
theory is wrong. We will beat them, as well as all the other
Competitors with
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
If NASA's theory is wrong, how are they any form of competition? This
doesn't compute.
It does if they use the same method and get similar results,
You can reach the video from here: http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/
and it's headlined like this Feature Stories: NASA's Method for a Clean
Nuclear Energy For Your Power Operated Technology
This is, well... sort of weird. I wonder if anyone in NASA's PR department
or higher management has
PS: What does NASA have against buses?
http://i.imgur.com/PVMDi.jpg
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
I am sure this is all going to be really hard for her and the moletrap
people, the possibility of an energy breakthrough goes against their dark
age thinking. My advice to her and them is get used to it.
What
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
MaryYugo wrote:
“What do you think that video clip says of a technical or scientific
nature, if anything? It's just wishful thinking without data, isn't it?”
** **
What you fail to
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:20 AM, David ledin
mathematic.analy...@gmail.comwrote:
Dick Smith will give to the charity group $200,000 if Mr Bryce, a
member of the Australian Skeptics confirm e-cat work as claimed by
rossi.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown
cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific
practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but
I'm remain
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
He is probably too old and poor to survive the years of litigation it
would take to recover anything from his intellectual property – Especially
since new physics must first be proven before any explanation
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
One fact that is conveniently ignored by the ones casting suspicion on
Rossi, is that he obtained his $ to finance all his work on e-Cat by
selling his interest in the biofuel company, which IIRC, he was the
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Capture Drone Downed by Iranian SaucerI'm not joking. I'm quoting
Wired.com:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/01/iran-ufo-drone/
Why is it always a saucer? Someone, somewhere must have a surplus of cups
and
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure which Moller we're speaking of here.
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/mahg/index.htm
Woohoo! I was thinking of this one: http
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.thespaceshow.com/detail.asp?q=1685
It's an hour of audio! Maybe someone who listened to it all can summarize
what Storms had to say specifically about Rossi. Will there be a transcript
at some point?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:18 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect there will be nothing... nada...
zilch... that could possible result in even the slightest dent in this
skeptic's heavily fortified belief structure.
Nothing except an iron-clad,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
And the following point…
Those who argue that Rossi’s inability to produce/replicate his 30%
efficient thermoelectric technology was proof of a scam, have no clue what
they are talking about.
If Rossi
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi's device has been tested by experts such as Kullander.
Based on what he did and what he asked Rossi (or failed to ask Rossi),
Kullander lost his credentials as an expert. However, to his credit, he
asked for more
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Also -- as I pointed out -- the cold fusion motor would soon be cheaper,
as the technology matures.
It's really obvious: Rossi should sell the eCat on eBay! :-)
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Numbness/tingling in the fingers and toes could also be a sign of
peripheral neuropathy, often caused by diabetes.
Other signs of diabetes include excessive thirst and frequent urination
(probably from
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
There has been way too much chicken-counting here. Yet, since this is an
advocacy group - its mission is not to prejudge and chastise - and this
situation provide an inherent conflict in
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you are being silly.
Of course I am. I am pointing out that it's also silly to stand in a small
room shivering in overcoats in the presence of a machine claimed to make (I
forget the claim for that model)
Here is a perfect example of his tangential response style:
*Q: I understand that you have been negotiating with Home Depot? Have
they seen the Ecat yet? Has it been tested for them?
A: We are in discussion with many possible distributors. We will give
precise information when any deal will
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=836
Go down several messages, to the one that begins:
Every charge of a Hyperion reactor (assuming a single reactor kernel)
requires approx 10gr of
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it is not ridiculous. You are being ridiculous, negative, and silly.
Cut the crap. It is a perfectly legitimate question. The information
provided by Defkalion on Ni in response to this question is very useful.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The first thing they asked about the Fleischmann-Pons experiments was: Is
there enough palladium to do this? Fleischmann answered: No, there
isn't. He said that at MIT and many other places. I think he was right, as
I
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't guarantee what a typical law maker or influential industrialist
would ask first but I bet most of the thrust would be on does it work, has
it been independently tested
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi has a patent in Italy which is enforceable in the entire EU.
No. 0001387256
Rossi's patent is essentially worthless because it
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's really Hank Mills. He always posts there.
Hank Mills writes favorably and enthusiastically about every impossible,
incompetent or fraudulent free energy claim he can get his hands on and the
web site on which he
One of the more extravagant and incredible (on any basis) claims made by
Rossi on his blog is that he is tooling up to manufacture a million E-cats
during calendar year 2012. Comments on the moletrap forum noted that:
A million ECats. National Instruments stock must be going up, then. I'd
like
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:16 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
If in subsequent years Rossi eCats actually DO start rolling off the
shelves of stores like Home Depot I suspect MY will soon start
searching around for another group (preferably linked to a
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2012-01-05 18:38, Robert Leguillon wrote:
It seems that Rossi may have reaped the benefits associated with
promises of independent university testing, but that delivery of this
may never occur.
Sterling D.
Rossi seems to have trouble even keeping track of what he writes on his own
blog.
Here, the device has an output of 5 kW net:
1. Andrea Rossi
January 6th, 2012 at 12:10
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=10#comment-165106
Mr ” Tom Jones”:
Since you used (a
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
I suggest they start by asking him why he and Focardi are freezing their
buns off in a room in which a running fusion reactor is present, supposedly
making 10 to 15 kW of thermal energy
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
It's not a barn, it's a small room.
Where is this photo? The photo I have is in a warehouse sized room.
I linked the photo. I think it's the same location that Krivit described
-- a small room
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo asked a sensible question: Why are these people wearing
overcoats standing next to a 12 kW heater?
She then said:
This is sort of a trivial matter and can't be settled for sure without
cooperation from
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
She’s an insignificant troll… nothing more.
Was that a calculated statement? Your behavior is so intelligent and
dignified statement, Mark. You should be proud of it and of yourself.
Rossi-quoting wouldn't be complete without this rant which has a distinctly
paranoid flavor:
Andrea Rossi
1.
January 4th, 2012 at 9:52
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=10#comment-163127
Dear Jonatan:
First of all, congratulations: to be an engineer at 21
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
they take the example of thermo electric device that rossi fail to
industrialize correctly and demonstrate...
the story they tell about TE elements is quite interesting, giving details
about the failure causes
Meanwhile, Defkalion promises independent testing. When? Oh... soon!
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=831
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
Rossi views the mention of Petroldragon, a stupendously expensive and
environmentally disastrous failure,
That is an absurd exaggeration. A thing like that can be cleaned up
without much
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Meanwhile, Defkalion promises independent testing. When? Oh... soon!
They do not promise it. They hope to have it.
They are a privately held business. They do not owe
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure it was minor for you -- you don't live there.
There have been environmental cleanup and remediation projects within a
few miles of my house a lot bigger than
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is regrettable that things have been kept so confidential in cold
fusion. That is because of politics and the opposition. I am sorry that I
have to be so vague.
Politics and opposition is a bad theory when it comes
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
some IMHO interesting article to undestand Rossi's behavior...
1-
analysis about why rossi don't prove e-cat so well...
http://nickelpower.org/2012/01/03/why-should-rossi-prove-it/
this item raise my eyes:
No
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Energy Liberator
energylibera...@gmail.comwrote:
I wonder how long after the US certification, it will be for Rossi to get
certification for Europe and the rest of the World.
See, what I wonder is how long it will be before either Rossi or Defkalion
prove that
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:48 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Titled: What if Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) really works?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/What-if-Low-Energy-Nuclear-by-Christopher-Calder-120103-869.html
The article is filled with errors
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,
“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.”*
***
** **
Same old tired repetition, despite numerous requests that you avoid it.
You just never learn
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
MaryYugo states with such confidence,
“And while they were technically hands on, all the tests used Rossi's
gear and his questionable methods so they were not independent. Failure to
state that is
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Mary Yugo stated/asked,
“Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi
and Defkalion. You always seem to object to my response but not to the
inanity that spawned it. Why do you think
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Others have registered their skepticism, and I don’t chastise them because
they don’t do it hundreds of times a month!
A tiny bit of hyperbole perhaps? I respond to others so I only do it a
hundred times a month if they do it the same or
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/1/4 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
What opinion is that?
yours, with respect.
Hi Alan,
Sorry but I didn't understand the significance of the second comment and
link. Perhaps you can restate or expand
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
If LENR reactions are sufficiently branded as dangerous, they could
easily be banned from personal use.
They might actually be dangerous. I do not think
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
All the essential parts of the method for measuring power input and
enthalpy were provided entirely by Rossi. It's true that some
thermometers and in a few instances AC power meters were provided
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
And by the way, it's expensive.
It is much cheaper than inadvertently irradiating hundreds of thousands of
people.
What's wrong with ordinary radiation detectors? Or do you think animals
are used to verify that
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
And by the way, it's expensive.
It is much cheaper than inadvertently irradiating hundreds of thousands
of people.
What's wrong with ordinary radiation detectors?
You can measure
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As to what is politically expedient for Levi, he'd better think of
something. I suspect his career at U of Bologna is going to be curtailed
some time soon unless Rossi coughs up some miracle such as $500K and a
device
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
there's not much reason to doubt this could be true.
Interesting way to put it. I suppose it could be true. But there is
plenty of reason to doubt that it *is* true. We've been all over that
ground before. And
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
Therefore, putting aside the actual content of the talks (which could have
ended either positively or not), this news must in my opinion be regarded
as a good one, because the more people and entities get
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I think it would be possible to buy a stand alone space heater if the
nuclear issue does not get too much attention. I guess it might be
possible to purchase any safe stand alone product that does not require the
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Inconclusive blather.
The only thing you can do with inconclusive data -- like Rossi and
Defkalion's.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
He should publicly issue a challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him
to witness and monitor
their experiments.
If we learned nothing else from the experiences with Rossi, it should be
that witness and monitor isn't enough.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Mary Yugo will repent of her sins after a long pause and will become one
of the best proponents of cold fusion filling all of the forums with
glowing reports. Rossi will hire her as his spokeswoman since she can work
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it not happened? Gibbs doesn't seem in any way
reluctant to write in detail about LENR
Geez, folks. If your email address is open to the world, as it is on this
email list, you will get tons of spam. You should never post your email
address on the internet except in the form: maryyugo [at symbol] yahoo
[dot] com so that a human has to interpret it. And it is best, for
purposes
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we give away the freedom to use our real id, because of
some criminal spammer?
Unfortunately yes. It's not much freedom to lose. I suggest keeping your
real email address strictly private. There
in high places at the DoE or the APS choose to
remain ignorant of this subject. Like Mary Yugo and Robert Park, they have
made a decision to read nothing.
Actually, I've read more than I ever expected to about Rossi and Defkalion
and it was all unfortunately unconvincing.
Perhaps they want
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates with its sloppy operating systems is in part responsible for spam.
:-)
Don't be surpised, what people see as a viral attack is usually a
mean to make the computers of unaware users the worst spammers
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Add to that a scenario in which Defkalion has set up a large, expensive
fake laboratory staffed by genuine experts being paid to pretend they are
doing research. The whole notion is so implausible I can't imagine why
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:13 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
My particular part in this effort was that I was to prototype a
mass-marketable version of the PLATO network, which I did circa 1980. I
won't go into the details of that network except to say that the
contribution it
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
The people who have been there can estimate that by looking. They know
what laboratory equipment costs.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could hear from these people directly and see
photos of what they saw (within the
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I am trying to arrange that. It might help if you and others would stop
making outrageous, baseless, ignorant attacks against them. Generally
speaking, people are not inclined to share information when you accuse them
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't recall accusing anyone of anything. I raise possibilities which
should be very easy to knock down.
You do accuse people.
Cite it or don't say it. Who did I accuse and of what and where
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
**
On 11-12-28 08:40 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Unless I'm greatly mistaken, you've accused a number of people of failing
to exist.
The only allegation of non existence I've ever made is the non-existence of
a proper
Do we really know Obdenaker actually wrote the email attributed to him?
Has anyone checked with NASA's PR office or anyone else there? I think it
was just from a post by an anonymous poster in a fan/enthusiast web site
run by a guy only known as Ben.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Alberto De Souza
alberto.investi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a new member of the list, but I'm reading the posts since January. I'm
addicted...
If we have a large COP (10-100), I believe we can use thin film
thermogenerators
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
SNIPIt's been called fusion confusion. Look, Aussie Guy is anonymous,
what he writes is next to meaningless. Don't mix this up with the huge
corpus of work from hundreds of scientists around the world.
Hi Abd,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:07 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I
You already do...in Afghanistan. ;) What do you think was the real reason
for
fighting the Taliban (under whom Opium production nearly died out).
This isn't a good place for politics but I can't let something that stupid
get by.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
wrote:
I take you do not read what I have written on this subject?
I try but sometimes my email client hiccups. Last I remember, you had
sealed a deal with Rossi and getting a whatever-watt plant was just around
the
Here's what Rossi wrote today (good old Rossi -- always worth a laugh):
1. Andrea Rossi
December 26th, 2011 at 11:39
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=7#comment-157154
Dear Francesco Fiorenzani: I hope within 2012. We must have a production
of 1 million
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
With a small thermal excess power it's not trivial to close the loop in my
opinion.
Agreed it's not trivial. But I was addressing Aussie Guy who said his
devices have a COP of 5 in the range of watts and
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello group,
Have a read at this. I can't tell whether these emails are to be trusted
or not (personally I believe they're authentic), but it appears that some
individuals in the US Department of Energy
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:53 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Nobody ever closes the loop.
I think the majority of the Vort Collective understands the fact that Vorl
and MY believe most CF/LENR claims are nothing more than horse manure.
I
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
Nobody ever closes the loop.
That is incorrect. Many people have closed the loop, starting with
Fleischmann and Pons. In cold fusion jargon, closing the loop is called
running
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
On 11-12-26 02:57 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Try responding to a real argument: if the claim, as Aussie Guy made it,
is for a device with a COP of 5 over an input measured in watts, then why
not close the loop? What
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggest you stop guessing and read the literature.
I suggest you stop referring vaguely to some amorphous literature and
answer the question -- see below for a clarification.
Cells running heat after death have
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
hey figure that people who do not believe calorimetry would not believe
this demonstration either. They have a good point. If someone revealed a
device of this nature, Mary Yugo would surely say it must be fake
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest you stop guessing and read the literature.
I suggest you stop referring vaguely to some amorphous literature and
answer the question . . .
No can do. I learned
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:13 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
OK, I will wait further for the information. It is pretty important to me
to determine if it is at all possible for enough energy to be stored and
then released to achieve Rossi's results. A good model such as your
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Arata ran a small motor with one heated by a self-sustaining gas-loaded
cell.
Cool! Did anyone verify this or replicate it? And how long did it run and
at what output level?
Why is it that specific questions as to
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Better link:
http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/26/more-helpful-e-mails-from-the-doe/
An email to Mr. X? Hah! Now we know who Rossi's anonymous buyer is. It's
none other than Mr. X!!
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
MaryYugo asks:
“Why is it that specific questions as to power output and duration are, to
some cold fusion advocates, like sunshine to vampires?”
** **
And Mary, the same could be said for your
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
What no comment on this:
My change of mind was a direct result of talking with Dr. Dennis
Bushnell, the Chief Scientist for NASA Langley who has assured me that over
100 experiments worldwide indicate that LENR
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Why not call Mr. Opdenaker to confirm? His phone number and email are
listed.
I don't want to pester him by telephone but I am thinking of sending an
email. I'd rather someone from the press do it -- perhaps
http://i.imgur.com/YdetE.png
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/YdetE.png
That was a response by Aber0der to this Alsetalokin remark:
I'll buy a Mac when you can pour water in one end and make espresso with
the steam from the internal iEcat out the other end.
Here
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 5:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Mary,
I would like very much to work with your acquaintance to see how his
model compares to some of the in dept analysis I completed upon the October
6 test data.
I totally understand how his model must work and
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
They output greater than 1 watt with a COP greater than 5.
Thermal or electrical? And if they output 5x input at a watt level, it
should be almost trivial to run them on their own output. A long run
without any
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
I have allocated $100k to the cell replication project. I was ready to
spend $200k to buy a 100 kW E-Cat system. When Rossi is ready to provide
the detailed specifications for his 330 Ac kW E-Cat, we will again
1. Italo A. Albanese
December 23rd, 2011 at 7:46
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=39#comment-155669
Dear Andrea Rossi,
could you provide some more information about the e-cat heating your
factory? Power, cop, running time, temperatures? It would be
101 - 200 of 863 matches
Mail list logo
