prevented from escaping from Rossi's hotCat by the hermetic stainless
steel reactor enclosure acting as a Faraday cage. There will be no
propagating RF escaping from the Rossi's reactor vessel. There is only the
possibility of low frequency evanescent fields escaping.
Bob Higgins
On
m. The neutrons would just be killing everyone around the
reactor. Any few neutrons detected externally are definitely a useful clue
about internal reactions, but fortunately few neutrons are ever detected.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:57 AM, frobertcook wrote:
> A small diamete
oduce a coaxial
reactor vessel (as shown in the Penon report) and seal its ends.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> NMR is caused by the vibration of the non-zero spin vector of a nucleus.
> This vibrating nuclear spin produces a vibrating magnetic field.
>
>
I have posted the cross-section of the hotCat as I have surmised it to be
constructed. The active medium is entirely in a hermetically sealed
stainless coaxial tube arrangement. The reactor vessel itself IS the
Faraday cage. It is not a part of the test, it is a part of the hotCat.
Bob Higgins
none to escape the hotCat because
the reaction is in a Faraday cage. The RF that could penetrate would have
to be below 1 kHz.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Hoped for prediction – but unlikely due to technical limitations: evidence
> of the signat
-inflate, and Df/H would need something like 500keV. So, hydrinos
would find some ppm of re-inflation on the tail of the Boltzmann curve, but
the Df/H atoms would not. Long before you got to a 500keV collision, the
Df/H would fuse with its collision target.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:32
ld
statistically occur in some thermal collisions - at a much greater rate
than with H. Could such thermal collisions with a ubiquitous Df/H be
responsible for observed but unexplained spontaneous radioactive decay?
What other behaviors would be expected of a ubiquitous Df/H gas? What
would r
ith strong electronic coupling (though it is
mostly nearest neighbor coupling). This coupled structure is there to
begin with - it is not formed ad hoc just for fractionating.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> The almost intractable problem for explaining LENR
R. I think Rossi is pursuing a course needed to build a business - he
is right to try. But I believe that even if his patent is granted, it will
be useless in protecting his product.
I also agree that Rossi has failed to completely disclose his invention.
He is in a real catch-22.
Bob Higgins
O
all of
its mass in a radiant explosion. There may be no singularity inside the
event horizon - the physics inside does not obey our known laws, and in
some similarity to the nucleus of the atom, the nature of the inside of the
event horizon is nearly impossible to probe.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Sep 25,
s
occurring in the condensed matter prior to the condensed matter being
evaporated and turned into a plasma?
Bob Higgins
eing reported across the many experiments is due to a process other
than fusion or transmutation.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> Ø Your attempt to dismiss the Claytor tritium results as being "high
>
lists. You have lost your open mind.
Ni-H could well be different. We will just have to wait for more data.
Mizuno is just a good data point with its own flaws and insights.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> I’m sorry but that is not what Miles seems to
e.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2dzRreW14cWVlazg/edit?usp=sharing
Let me know if you have trouble accessing or viewing these .png image files.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
>
> I posted drawings o
Hi Eric,
Nice spreadsheet. I like how it captures a lot of considerations in one
place.
Have you considered adding the reactions that would include a delta in
atomic number of 2N? Seems like there were trends in experiment reports
showing transmutations by integer multiples of 2 in atomic numbe
ell as the
catalyzed Ni powder. He could have gone back to one of those other
chemistries to build the higher temperature hotCat.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
>
>
> About the H2 pressure and the mean free path of monoatomic hydrogen -- I'm
&
elies on radioactive
additives. Doesn't mean they wouldn't have an effect on the reaction, I
just don't think Rossi uses any.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
>
> Note that an alph
nterview with Sergio Focardi, the father of 'Ni-H Cold
Fusion'"; Radio Citta del Capo - Bologna - Italy.
You can get it off of my Google drive at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2VHhPQ0paM1dvME0/edit?usp=sharing
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Bob Higg
has).
Now you show me the reports and evidence that Rossi *does* use a
radioisotope in his system.
Time for dinner. :)
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> So many egregious errors ... so little time to correct them all...
>
> Bob Higgins: This business
in the process of the electron giving
up energy to enter the DDL state, that energy would have to be given to the
other electrons. That energy is so great as to completely ionize the atom
for small atomic number. I can't quite wrap my head around how this can
happen.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 1
as also reported this.
Nuclear effects are unquestionably being seen. What is not clear is the
balance between possible DDL transitions and nuclear effects.
Bob Higgins
Hi Jack,
That is unfortunate. We need to find a schematic for this spot welder or
open it up and create one. It could be the secondary is just grounded to
the ground pin. If so, we need to know how it is grounded. Ground loops,
when such high currents are involved, can ruin your test equipment
e
know that DDL cannot be responsible for the Pd-D data. It doesn't mean
that DDL is not a part of the puzzle, just not the whole puzzle. Maybe it
is a bigger part of the puzzle in Ni-H(D).
Jones, you are standing on a stool with only 1 leg - you have more juggling
to do to substantiate y
One more facet of the DDL connection is that chemically bound DDL molecules
are entirely possible - such as D^D and D^D^. Meulenberg proposes that
these "pico-molecules" will fuse in "10s of picoseconds". It is likely
that "pico-molecules" could form inside of Ed Storms' hydroton. These
pico-mol
Hi Jack,
I have created some diagrams to help communicate the setups that I am going
to describe. It on my Google drive at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2MTlIX1pwMC1PdHc/edit?usp=sharing
These setups presume that when you measure between the high current bars
and the pins of the
While Va'vra is recently trying to connect the 511 keV galactic signal with
DDL hydrogen, his theory about multi-photon DDL transitions is older. He
has been doing work with spark discharge in hydrogen and uses a large
cylindrical scintillator with an axial hole to look for coincident
detection of
enr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/power-measurement.png
>
> I won't be able to do 10 amps for calibration, but I can do anything up to
> 5 amps with my lab power supply.
>
> Best regards,
> Jack
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Bob Higgins
>
This is in part because Va'vra hypothesizes that it may be possible to
produce DDL transitions with multiple photons. If multiple photons are
involved, there is nothing to insure that all photon components would come
out in the same direction (like a laser). Hence, you would have to
integrate all
ion cross-section. It will readily pass through
containers.
- Most agree that if two DDL hydrogen isotope atoms form a DDL molecule,
they will fuse immediately (within 10's of picoseconds).
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> Jones--
>
>
You do not appear to know what you are talking about; except in one
respect: You are correct that it is Jack's experiment and his course of
action is absolutely his choice.
My inputs to this topic are terminated. I have no intention to
contributing to this becoming a flame like some of the other
It would appear that you are not qualified to say that "calorimetry using
water is a non-starter". First, in DI water there is no electrolyte added
(just the opposite) and there will be no current flowing through this water
being used to capture the heat and thermalize the UV. The DI water has no
but short pulse needed to create
a 5 joule ignition. I think there is no chance to verify a 5 joule
ignition with this spot welder setup.
Best case is to replicate what Mills has done with ~200 joule input and
with better calorimetry (for example, doing it with the electrodes under
water).
Bob H
icate what Mills has
done, which is with an input of about 200 joules.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
> You have a point.
>
> Though my view is, it may not be worth making these elaborate
> modifications. Are we striving for superaccuracy, or are we j
assailable -
it is meticulous work.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> Jumping over the precipice, you will need to use one of the big copper
> arms as a current shunt. Connect a lead across two points on one arm. Use
> another calibrated source to run X
someone is uncomfortable with doing this, they shouldn't try
it! Protect yourself!
Bob
On Aug 26, 2014 8:49 PM, "Eric Walker" wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
>
> If you embed the electrodes reasonably well into the water, you may be
>&
out from heat rise. You will need to
stir the water and measure the water in multiple points. You will need an
insulated container.
Either that, our you need to be good at telling stories about the big fish
that got away (is this Mills?).
BTW, I applaud your efforts.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Aug
may be a thermomagnetic heat pumping effect involved in the cooling effect
of the core.
Bob
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> From: Bob Higgins
>
> I am convinced of this connection: if one can document a cooling effect in
> a
> transformer core
Also see:
*http://www.rfcafe.com/references/radio-news/subminiature-magnetic-amplifiers-dec-1957-radio-tv-news.htm
<http://www.rfcafe.com/references/radio-news/subminiature-magnetic-amplifiers-dec-1957-radio-tv-news.htm>*
Bob
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> T
old the pin in place. This
levitation demonstration seems to be just spectacle and I cannot see how it
would be related to energy production.
Bob Higgins
here. It is just showing that the ferrite slab is permanently magnetized.
However, if a permanent magnet is used as a transformer core, I am not sure
what the result would be. It would certainly be nonlinear. In a passive
device reciprocity is not guaranteed if a DC magnetic field is present.
mechanics. So, I consider his method wrong.
Regards, Jerry"
Dr. Va'vra has a 2013 ArXiv paper (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.0833v3.pdf) -
I think it is a fascinating fit to this thread. If someone else already
cited this, I apologize for the duplication.
Bob Higgins
t NEVER all behavior). Physics LAWS are just rules of thumb
that have proved to be valid most of the time (perhaps all of the time in
our historical experience, but that does not make them inviolable).
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at
ng
photons.
But, the speculation was interesting.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Another wild thought on nuclear “faux-transmutation.”
>
>
>
> If a DDL can displace an inner electron of some elements (K or L shell)
> then the resultant
Bob,
Can you explain the reference to "13" that you made here? I am confused as
to the reference.
Thanks, Bob
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> Bob --
>
> If I understood the last paper from 13 the folks from Los Alamos wrote,
> commenting on the Kim rejection of the DDL t
beneficial. However, LENR at 1,000,000x
would be even better.
Bob Higgins
P.S.: Terry, Thank you for posting Vavra's presentation.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Sooner or later, CMNS will also pick up on a most important factoid about
> the DDL – which has
to be exposed without a
window or a good high pressure window needs to be found that will pass this
low energy range of photons that can withstand high H2 pressure.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
&
s with and without a magnet being present in the chamber.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
>
>
> That would be pretty cool. On occasion I've looked for the Piantelli
> anecdote, which I read somewhere, but I haven't succeeded yet in tracking
> it down.
>
obably best be tested by using a computer to evaluate the
solution space numerically without simplifying assumptions.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Bob Cook
>
>
>
> Jones, do you know what they said about the possible reactions in the
In the diagram in the TechCrunch article, they talk about fusing deuterium
and helium. A deuterium-deuterium fusion would produce copious neutrons
and is highly undesirable. They want charged particles to enable direct
conversion to electrical. The Wikipedia page says they have published
someth
in the
arc high enough for the disassociation he claims is required.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jack Cole wrote:
> Thanks Jones.
>
> Regarding Mills and titanium fuel. Anyone have a sense the degree to
> which he has specially prepared the particles with water
Jones, Do you have a reference for Naudts' paper? It would be interesting
to get Yeong Kim's take on this. Some time ago, he published a paper
refuting the existence of any stable f/H state.
Eigenvectors, in a linear system, are a complete basis for
expansion/description of any driven solution (
which could behave more like condensed matter - but that would just
be a guess. The simpler answer is that the f/H states are probably not the
explanation for the observation.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:51 PM,
ion mode and
also molecular fragmentation.
Thanks for stimulating me to take a closer look at QMS.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> The quadrapole mass spec RGA will have a front end ionizer to extract an
> ion
e one you propose.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> I have a few observations that are not being discussed here (and I may be
> missing something) from the slides from the MIT Colloquium.
>
> ·
cles "quantity"?) grew
across the experiment even though the gas total mass declined.
- The excess heat does seem to correlate with Mizuno's total gas
quantity curve and the M/e=2 curve which look similar.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> A
the conductor, it was
> ignore. That means that the energy output was underestimated because Qcond
> was not measured at all; only the temp rise in the calorimeter was
> considered.
>
> Also, the COP was 4+ based on this specific single explosion, Mills did
> not claim COP of 2.
&g
could easily have been closer to 1. This is an extremely difficult
modified calorimeter to calibrate. Perhaps when Mills makes the arc source
small enough to fit entirely in the calorimeter (except for some tiny
capacitor charging wires), it will be possible to get an accurate
measurement.
Bob
. Mills may be correct about the fractional
quantum states of hydrogen and they may be complicit in LENR. But he would
lose a lot of his patent value if the heat were proved to actually be
coming from LENR.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
> If I remember correctl
e stuck nucleon from starting to final position may be much
shorter than the period of an x-ray.
Bob
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
>
> When you speak of the plasma fusion output channels, I like to t
they
would also have been measured by the calorimeter. To escape the
calorimeter would require high energy x-rays and a lot of these would also
have been measured to a lesser efficiency.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
orionwo...@charter.ne
and I will believe a credible demo
when I see it reported. I won't believe speculation - but - cogent
speculation does deserve to be investigated.
LENR has been demonstrated at high currents. See the Santilli papers and
Kadeisvili's replication of his transmutation work.
Bob Higgins
That explanation is completely faulty. Did the visible spectrum escape the
calorimeter? If not, it was all converted to heat and should have been
measured.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> How about this...
>
> The calorimeter only measures the heat (infrared portion of th
re
to adequately account for the ejecta in the control vs. actual experiment.
Why is Mills suddenly able to claim a high COP?
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
orionwo...@charter.net> wrote:
> I certainly do not dispute the long lis
soliton-like, it may be indicating
that the vacuum is not linear at the scales of elementary particles. Once
the nonlinearity is invoked at that scale, there may be wave-to-wave
coupling.
Bob Higgins
I did not think I originated it, but I am convinced of it. This came up in
particular for the proposed shielding effect by WL. It is a similar issue.
Once the atom is excited with high energy to be released very quickly, it
is difficult for pretty much any de-excitation mechanism to be 100%
effe
The problem is that after the high energy gamma is created, it is not
plausible that 100% of the quanta are downshifted - some will fail in this
post-fusion downshifting and be released as high energy. Since 0% high
energy quanta are seen experimentally, the high energy quanta must not get
created
I believe Peter Hagelstein is excited about the Karabut result because he
believes that Karabut demonstrates high energy x-ray photons being
synthesized by a collective sum of much lower energy lattice phonons. If
it is possible for this up-conversion to occur, then it lends credibility
to his the
What I meant is that Rossi doesn't make is own starting (un-catalyzed) Ni
particles, he buys them. The Ni powder he buys is produced by the
manufacturer from precipitation of liquid nickel tetracarbonyl. The powder
produced by this process is just pure Ni having a high external surface
area in a
er would support the
formation of NAE as cracks as Ed Storms describes, and maybe even the
magnetic traps as described by Yeong Kim. I wrote a paper about this
processing. If you are interested, private email me and I will send you a
copy. It was posted to Vortex before.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Jul
grows" features
on the Ni.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> Rossi claims that he uses nano-nickel particles. I have no idea what
> the sintering and melting temperatures of those structures. We know that
> carbon nano structures have very good high tem
strictures of thermodynamics to embrace your scenario.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
>
>> I completely disagree Axil, the Mizuno endothermic (or Ahern endothermic)
>> observation is not at all catastrophic.
>>
>> You said:
&
the system, it seems plausible that such resonant structures could
absorb a significant amount of energy and elevate fractional state hydrogen
atoms to a state closer to ground state.
Bob Higgins
Jones,
I think you did not understand or agree with what I said previously in
bullet 4).
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> From: Bob Higgins
> Consider that the DDL state is regarded as being about 511
keV less than H in normal
ou say, if deuterium enrichment is found in analysis of Rossi's 6-month
test (don't know if they will be allowed to test for this), then it would
be a very insightful report.
I could easily have bungled this proposition. Please set me straight.
Bob Higgins
the hydrogen while not itself
shrinking.
I would like to hear your comments.
Bob Higgins
than 0.1, pretty much a non-starter from the beginning.
What is the motivation to do this experiment? Unless Mills can demonstrate
a much higher COP to optical photons, this will never be gainful.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at
I just received my copy of Ed's new book and I am reading it now. Too early
to review, but it is hard to stop reading.
On Jul 14, 2014 8:10 PM, "Kevin O'Malley" wrote:
> The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: / /An Examination of the
> Relationship between Observation and Explanation/ by
Dennis did not explicitly say that an H & D mix was required, but I believe
that his theory and his own experiments have led him to mostly use a 50:50
mix in his present experiments. He showed me a Ni based experiment that he
had setup, which he turned on while I was visiting. Before I left, his
I have moved west, and Dennis Cravens is just a couple miles away. I
visited him recently. In his lab he still has long term tests operating
with his spheres (of course, along with other experiments in progress). He
said that he charged a HydroStik and then froze it at dry ice temperature.
At t
mean that mu-metal had the
greatest LENR rate of the materials he tried.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Just when it looked like things were becoming clearer in LENR theory, they
> seem to have become more complicated. Ockham fails again – n
osely associated with Widom & Larsen. I have a great deal of respect
for his creativity and ingenuity.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> This patent is a huge surprise. Not only is the technique obvious, many
> other filings which relate to LENR have
I think it is much more likely that Rossi's reaction is positive feedback
when operating, is chaotic in nature (discontinuous), and requires a
temperature threshold for the reaction to work.
First, positive feedback - when the temperature is higher the reaction rate
is higher, causing the temperat
in my previous post.
Bob
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> These experiments are generally run with a small fixed charge of H2, which
> puts strict limits on the available energy from H2 burning or chemical
> energy in
ned with a mistake in H
enthalpy of a factor of 2.4 is off the mark by a huge factor (100's to 10's
of thousands) and the statement is wholly specious.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, one can state with certainty that burning hy
As an engineer, I would love to take on that product challenge. I am
moving to a "cold climate" area. Cold climate heat pumps still only
produce a COP of about 2-3 and have a lot of control to keep the exchanger
from becoming frozen (frequent defrost cycles). It is a split unit that
still needs
ino states. I look forward to reading his full
theory when he publishes it.
Bob
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bob Higgins wrote:
>
> One way to successively remove the energy in such a hydroton configuration
>> may be the
gt; coupling and maybe others unknown. Some of these may be controlled more or
> less by the local magnetic field which change the parameters of allowed
> transitions as exist in a quantum system with its quantum energy states,
> whatever they may be at any instant particular instant in ti
the fusion occurs. One way to
successively remove the energy in such a hydroton configuration may be the
progressive conversion to an ever more fractional state, and when Mills'
minimum size of 1/137 is reached, fusion occurs. The hydroton
configuration could provide the evanescent coupling need
know
unless he tells us.
I give Rossi credit for navigation as far as he has come in such difficult
waters. He still holds his secret (but with a tenuous grasp).
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, he did not understand how his device o
day's understanding of LENR*.
The real opportunity is writing patents on the multitude of apparatus that
will use LENR, that will provide a means of throttling the reaction, that
will make it more durable, or will make it safer.
It is really, really hard to build a company on a trade secret.
- Bob H
If true, that is one heck of a claim - they would be claiming an over-unity
COP of 443 (44300%).
I checked the math. 2797 SCF of H2 - IS - equivalent to 221.5 kWH.
What I think is probably wrong is the 500W input - it must be a typo. They
must mean 500kW input. This would put their COP to be 4
I can tell you from first hand experience that SEM analysis is MUCH harder
than it sounds. I have had access to a good, but not great SEM for
analysis of my powders. Features at the nanoscale simply were not
resolve-able with that SEM. Perhaps with the world's finest SEM, you might
be able to ge
be discern-able after modeling if real.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/GlumacReport2.pdf
>
> A tenth of a degree or less rise in temperature in the calorimeter.
> Everything extrapolated from that. LOL.
>
>
>
This is largely a problem with grid-tie solar inversion and the fact that
solar generation only happens during the day. As long as the utility
company has less PV inverted than the difference between their daytime and
nighttime loads, it is better for them to have the PV generation. Once the
PV g
LENR device to make it to market. Having a shipping product inside
another product is a sure track to a device patent. This could be the
finger removed from the dike.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> Swartz is credible! However, such a small effect is no
I thought the justifications for these mechanical over-unity machines came
from some kind of non-conservation during JERK (the derivative of
acceleration) and the machines were designed to produce jerk. Does anyone
else remember the justification based on non-conservation during jerk?
Perhaps dur
er of mass. As you start approaching the sources,
or are surrounded by them, the field will depend on the inverse square to
each of the sources. It becomes a distributed source calculation.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> There is no limit on the strength o
I want to
correlate these with emitted photons.
Unfortunately, I am on a temporary hold to get myself and my little lab
moved across the US to NM.
Bob
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Bob Higgins wrote:
>
> Rossi has stated that
effects.
So in this scenario, 100% efficient fractionating is possible.
Bob Higgins
I believe that some fractionation must be taking place, but not to phonons.
Phonons are contra-indicated by the experimental evidence. Phonons
dissipate rapidly to heat with a decay constant that is based on the
acoustic velocity. This means that the temperature will be extremely high
near the n
601 - 700 of 779 matches
Mail list logo
